National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Residual Risk and Technology Review, 55339-55340 [2017-25169]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules Band Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). If permission is granted, persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or designated representative and proceed as directed while within the zone. (4) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 11 p.m. on December 31, 2017 through 1 a.m. on January 1, 2018. Dated: November 15, 2017. L.P. Harrison, Jr., Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region. [FR Doc. 2017–25125 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 60 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9971–03– OAR] RIN 2060–AS92 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Residual Risk and Technology Review I. Background II. Purpose of the NODA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data availability. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing this notice of data availability (NODA) in support of the proposed rule titled ‘‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Residual Risk and Technology Review,’’ which was published on September 21, 2017. In this document, the EPA is soliciting public comment on information added to the docket (EPA–HQ–OAR–2016– 0442) on November 3, 2017. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 4, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2016–0442, at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:16 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243–04), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541– 1103; fax number: (919) 541–4991; and email address: storey.brian@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Organization of This Document. The information presented in this document is organized as follows: I. Background On September 21, 2017, the EPA proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry to address the results of the residual risk and technology review (RTR) in accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The proposed rule indicated that the EPA found risks due to emissions of air toxics to be acceptable from this source category, and identified no costeffective controls under the technology review to achieve further emissions reductions. In addition, the proposed rule included amendments to correct and clarify rule testing and monitoring provisions. In support of the proposed rule, the EPA posted over 160 documents to the docket to allow the public to provide comment on the rule and on documents used to develop the rule, in accordance with section 307(d) of the CAA. The subject matter of these docketed items included various correspondence with stakeholders, summary of meeting minutes, and technical memoranda related to the risk assessment and technology review process. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 55339 II. Purpose of the NODA On November 1, 2017, the EPA became aware that two memoranda prepared to support the September 21, 2017, proposed rule were inadvertently omitted from the docket. The subject of the two memoranda are ‘‘Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source Category,’’ and ‘‘Technology Review for the Portland Cement Production Source Category.’’ The purpose of the memorandum with the subject title of ‘‘Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source Category’’ is to document the technical approach and rationale used to develop the risk modeling input data used to perform the residual risk assessment, pursuant to section 112(f) of the CAA. It includes discussions of the methods used to develop a list of facilities subject to the source category; the development of actual, acute, and allowable emissions datasets; and discussions of how stack parameter data and stack locations were derived. The memorandum was actually included in the docket as Appendix 1 of the document, ‘‘Residual Risk Assessment for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source Category in Support of the September 2017 Risk and Technology Review Proposed Rule.’’ This document was posted to the docket prior to publication of the proposed rule as Docket Item No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2016– 0442–0153. However, we also intended to include this memorandum as a standalone document. The purpose of the memorandum with the subject title of ‘‘Technology Review for the Portland Cement Production Source Category’’ is to provide a summary of the methods used to determine what, if any, new developments in practices, processes, and control technologies exist for the Portland Cement Manufacturing source category to support our proposed determination regarding whether revisions to the rule are warranted under section 112(d)(6) of the CAA. The information provided by this memorandum was summarized in the preamble of the September 21, 2017, proposed rule. The EPA recognizes the importance of these two documents, and posted both documents to the docket on November 3, 2017. The docket item numbers are EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442–0188 for ‘‘Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source Category’’ and EPA–HQ–OAR–2016– 0442–0189 for ‘‘Technology Review for E:\FR\FM\21NOP1.SGM 21NOP1 55340 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules the Portland Cement Production Source Category.’’ We are issuing this NODA to provide notice and ensure that parties have an opportunity to submit comments on these documents for a period of 30 days after their insertion in the docket. Although the public comment period for the proposed rule is scheduled to close on November 21, 2017, the public will be allowed to submit their comments, as well as provide comments on the proposed conclusions the EPA reached when it relied on these documents to propose the RTR rulemaking, for a period of 30 days, as required by the CAA. The comment period for the two aforementioned documents added to the docket was opened on November 3, 2017, and will close on December 4, 2017. Dated: November 14, 2017. Stephen Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. [FR Doc. 2017–25169 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management 43 CFR Part 8360 [17X LLAKF0000 L12200000.AL0000 LXSS002L0000] Proposed Supplementary Rules for Public Lands Managed by the Eastern Interior Field Office at the Fairbanks District Office Administrative Site, Fairbanks, Alaska Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Proposed supplementary rules. AGENCY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing supplementary rules for all BLMadministered lands within the Fairbanks District Office administrative site. These proposed supplementary rules are necessary to enhance the safety of visitors, protect natural resources, improve recreation experiences and opportunities, and protect public health. DATES: Interested parties may submit written comments regarding the proposed supplementary rules until January 22, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by mail, electronic mail, or handdelivery. Mail or Hand Delivery: Jeanie Cole, Fairbanks District Office, 222 University Avenue, Fairbanks, AK 99709. asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:16 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 Electronic mail: EasternInterior@ blm.gov (include ‘‘proposed supplementary rules’’ in the subject line). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanie Cole, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, Fairbanks District Office, 222 University Avenue, Fairbanks AK 99709, 907–474–2200, j05cole@blm.gov. People who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above individual. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Comment Procedures You may mail, email, or hand-deliver comments to Jeanie Cole at the addresses listed above (See ADDRESSES). Written comments on the proposed supplementary rules should be specific and confined to issues pertinent to the proposed rules, and should explain the reason for any recommended change. Where possible, comments should reference the specific section or paragraph of the proposal that the commenter is addressing. The BLM is not obligated to consider or include in the Administrative Record for the final supplementary rules, comments delivered to an address other than those listed above (See ADDRESSES) or comments that the BLM receives after the close of the comment period (See DATES), unless they are postmarked or electronically dated before the deadline. Comments, including names, street addresses, and other contact information for respondents, will be available for public review at the Fairbanks District Office listed in ADDRESSES during regular business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays). Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your comment— including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask the BLM in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. II. Background The Fairbanks District Office is located in a densely-developed, mixed residential/commercial area of Fairbanks, Alaska, on BLM-managed public lands within the Eastern Interior Field Office on the south bank of the Chena River. In addition to visiting the office, the public often uses the open PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 space adjacent to the office building to picnic, walk dogs, or access the Chena River. Visitors encounter inconsistent rules regarding appropriate conduct at the Fairbanks District Office administrative site. This inconsistency hampers the BLM’s ability to provide a safe visitor experience and minimize conflicts among users. The BLM is proposing these supplementary rules to establish a consistent set of rules for the Fairbanks District Office administrative site. Lack of BLM rules for the management of this administrative site prevents BLM Law Enforcement Rangers from enforcing prohibited acts that compromise public health and safety, such as open fires in proximity to office buildings, overnight/long-term occupancy, unattended domestic animals, and unattended vehicles and skateboarding. The highly urbanized nature of the Fairbanks District Office and its location in Class C–E airspace on final approach to Fairbanks International Airport, as well as the adjacent State Division of ForestryInteragency Fire helipad, make some uses of public lands inappropriate, for example, operating aerial drones which currently prohibits drone operation over or immediately adjacent to neighboring Forestry helipads (14 CFR 107.43). In addition, enforcing State laws and/or Borough ordinances is administratively more difficult for BLM Law Enforcement Rangers than enforcing established BLM rules. The BLM is proposing to establish these supplementary rules under the authority of 43 CFR 8365.1–6, which authorizes BLM State Directors to establish supplementary rules for the protection of persons, property, and public lands and resources. There are currently no existing supplementary rules for the Fairbanks District Office administrative site. The administrative site is all property and lands encompassed within the land parcel owned/managed by the BLM at North Star Borough, legal address 222 University Avenue, Fairbanks, AK 99709, described as: Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska T. 1 S., R. 1 W., Sec. 7, lots 63 and 69. The area described here aggregates 11.41 acres. You may obtain a map of the Fairbanks District Office administrative site in Fairbanks, Alaska, by contacting the office (see ADDRESSES) or by accessing the following Web site: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-frontoffice/eplanning/projectSummary.do? methodName=renderDefaultProject Summary&projectId=71962. E:\FR\FM\21NOP1.SGM 21NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55339-55340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25169]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442; FRL-9971-03-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS92


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the 
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Residual Risk and Technology 
Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing this 
notice of data availability (NODA) in support of the proposed rule 
titled ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From 
the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Residual Risk and 
Technology Review,'' which was published on September 21, 2017. In this 
document, the EPA is soliciting public comment on information added to 
the docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442) on November 3, 2017.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 4, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0442, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and 
Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and 
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle 
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax 
number: (919) 541-4991; and email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Organization of This Document. The information presented in this 
document is organized as follows:

I. Background
II. Purpose of the NODA

I. Background

    On September 21, 2017, the EPA proposed amendments to the National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland 
Cement Manufacturing Industry to address the results of the residual 
risk and technology review (RTR) in accordance with section 112 of the 
Clean Air Act (CAA). The proposed rule indicated that the EPA found 
risks due to emissions of air toxics to be acceptable from this source 
category, and identified no cost-effective controls under the 
technology review to achieve further emissions reductions. In addition, 
the proposed rule included amendments to correct and clarify rule 
testing and monitoring provisions. In support of the proposed rule, the 
EPA posted over 160 documents to the docket to allow the public to 
provide comment on the rule and on documents used to develop the rule, 
in accordance with section 307(d) of the CAA. The subject matter of 
these docketed items included various correspondence with stakeholders, 
summary of meeting minutes, and technical memoranda related to the risk 
assessment and technology review process.

II. Purpose of the NODA

    On November 1, 2017, the EPA became aware that two memoranda 
prepared to support the September 21, 2017, proposed rule were 
inadvertently omitted from the docket. The subject of the two memoranda 
are ``Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland 
Cement Manufacturing Source Category,'' and ``Technology Review for the 
Portland Cement Production Source Category.''
    The purpose of the memorandum with the subject title of 
``Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland Cement 
Manufacturing Source Category'' is to document the technical approach 
and rationale used to develop the risk modeling input data used to 
perform the residual risk assessment, pursuant to section 112(f) of the 
CAA. It includes discussions of the methods used to develop a list of 
facilities subject to the source category; the development of actual, 
acute, and allowable emissions datasets; and discussions of how stack 
parameter data and stack locations were derived. The memorandum was 
actually included in the docket as Appendix 1 of the document, 
``Residual Risk Assessment for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source 
Category in Support of the September 2017 Risk and Technology Review 
Proposed Rule.'' This document was posted to the docket prior to 
publication of the proposed rule as Docket Item No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-
0442-0153. However, we also intended to include this memorandum as a 
stand-alone document.
    The purpose of the memorandum with the subject title of 
``Technology Review for the Portland Cement Production Source 
Category'' is to provide a summary of the methods used to determine 
what, if any, new developments in practices, processes, and control 
technologies exist for the Portland Cement Manufacturing source 
category to support our proposed determination regarding whether 
revisions to the rule are warranted under section 112(d)(6) of the CAA. 
The information provided by this memorandum was summarized in the 
preamble of the September 21, 2017, proposed rule.
    The EPA recognizes the importance of these two documents, and 
posted both documents to the docket on November 3, 2017. The docket 
item numbers are EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442-0188 for ``Development of the RTR 
Risk Modeling Dataset for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Source 
Category'' and EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442-0189 for ``Technology Review for

[[Page 55340]]

the Portland Cement Production Source Category.''
    We are issuing this NODA to provide notice and ensure that parties 
have an opportunity to submit comments on these documents for a period 
of 30 days after their insertion in the docket. Although the public 
comment period for the proposed rule is scheduled to close on November 
21, 2017, the public will be allowed to submit their comments, as well 
as provide comments on the proposed conclusions the EPA reached when it 
relied on these documents to propose the RTR rulemaking, for a period 
of 30 days, as required by the CAA. The comment period for the two 
aforementioned documents added to the docket was opened on November 3, 
2017, and will close on December 4, 2017.

    Dated: November 14, 2017.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017-25169 Filed 11-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P