Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Assessing Client Factors Associated With Detectable HIV Viral Loads; and Models of Care and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, 52309-52311 [2017-24491]
Download as PDF
52309
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 217 / Monday, November 13, 2017 / Notices
needed to review instructions; to
develop, acquire, install and utilize
technology and systems for the purpose
of collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information; to search
data sources; to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. The total annual burden
hours estimated for this ICR are
summarized in the table below.
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Form name
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total
responses
Total burden
hours
In-class evaluations .............................................................
Mail/Telephone surveys .......................................................
Focus groups .......................................................................
40,000
12,000
250
1
1
1
40,000
12,000
250
.05
.25
1.5
2,000
3,000
375
Total ..............................................................................
52,250
........................
52,250
........................
5,375
HRSA specifically requests comments
on (1) the necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions, (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
Amy McNulty,
Acting Director, Division of the Executive
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2017–24492 Filed 11–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Public Comment
Request; Assessing Client Factors
Associated With Detectable HIV Viral
Loads; and Models of Care and the
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
HRSA has submitted an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. Comments
submitted during the first public review
of this ICR will be provided to OMB.
OMB will accept further comments from
the public during the review and
approval period.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 09, 2017
Jkt 244001
Comments on this ICR should be
received no later than December 13,
2017.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
including the ICR Title, to the desk
officer for HRSA, either by email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the clearance requests
submitted to OMB for review, email Lisa
Wright-Solomon, the HRSA Information
Collection Clearance Officer at
paperwork@hrsa.gov or call (301) 443–
1984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Collection Request Title:
Assessing Client Factors Associated
with Detectable HIV Viral Loads and
Models of Care and the Ryan White
HIV/AIDS Program.
OMB No.: 0906–xxxx—NEW.
Abstract: The Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program (RWHAP), first authorized by
the U.S. Congress in 1990, is
administered by HRSA’s HIV/AIDS
Bureau (HAB). The RWHAP provides
medical services, treatment, and/or
support services to 533,036 clients in
2015; 97.0 percent of these clients were
living with HIV. This information
collection request covers two distinct
evaluation studies with RWHAP
provider sites that will share
components of data collection
instruments through shared variables.
Sharing data collection instruments will
minimize burden for RWHAP provider
sites collecting this data and will
increase the sample size for data
analysis thus resulting in more robust
data and greater generalizability of
results.
The first evaluation study, Assessing
Client Factors Associated with
Detectable HIV Viral Loads, will explore
individuals’ specific facilitators and
barriers to achieving and sustaining
viral suppression. Early and effective
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
treatment for HIV has been shown to
greatly reduce associated morbidity and
mortality, and prevents transmission of
HIV. In spite of the known benefit of
treatment, many individuals remain out
of care or access care only
intermittently; the CDC estimated that
in 2013, approximately 45 percent of
people living with HIV (PLWH) in the
United States were not virally
suppressed, indicating a significant gap
in the percentage of PLWH who are
being successfully engaged and retained
in care. In spite of the increased
attention on retention in care and the
overarching goal of viral suppression,
little data exist regarding the specific
individual factors that are associated
with sub-optimal viral suppression.
Such information is valuable for
targeting programs to reach populations
that are currently not achieving HIV
viral suppression.
The second evaluation study, Models
of Care and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program, seeks to answer the critical
questions of what individual and
system-wide factors, including the
models of care employed among
RWHAP provider sites, contribute to
better health outcomes for PLWH. While
advances in treatment have improved
survival in patients with HIV, longer
lives are associated with increased
prevalence of adverse effects of HIV
infection and therapeutic complications,
concurrent with medical conditions
related to aging processes that would
occur in the absence of HIV. These longterm complications amplify chronic
disease management as a major issue for
the HIV population and a challenge for
the delivery of effective health care. Yet
little is known about how the method of
health services delivery (the ‘‘model of
care’’) contributes to better health
outcomes, including HIV-related
outcomes. For example, does it make a
difference if a patient receives HIV care
from a primary care provider, a
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
52310
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 217 / Monday, November 13, 2017 / Notices
specialist, or from a care team that
includes both? Understanding the most
effective models of care is important for
HIV specialists, primary care
physicians, and other clinicians who
care for PLWH as they design and
coordinate a full array of primary care
and support services for their patients.
These primary care and support services
have a direct impact on HIV viral
suppression, which in turn improves
life expectancy and quality of life and
prevents HIV transmission.
The two studies inform each other in
that the degree to which clients achieve
and sustain viral suppression may be
attributed partly to the model of care
practiced at their clinic. Likewise, the
degree to which its clients have
achieved viral suppression may drive a
clinic to practice a particular model of
care. The two studies will collect
several identical data elements through
their individual collection instruments,
allowing data to be aggregated across the
two studies. The aggregation of data
across the two studies will minimize
burden for RWHAP provider sites
collecting this data and will increase the
sample size for data analysis thus
resulting in more robust data and greater
generalizability of results.
A 60-day Federal Register Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
May 18, 2017 (Volume 82, page 22838)
which solicited comments on this data
collection. Four comments were
received that focused on how facilities
will be selected for participation and the
importance of adequate nutrition for
PLWH.
Need and Proposed Use of the
Information: The Assessing Client
Factors Associated with Detectable HIV
Viral Loads study will identify
characteristics of RWHAP clients and
health facilities that are associated with
the ability to achieve and sustain an
undetectable viral load as compared to
the characteristics that are associated
with sub-optimal viral suppression.
This study will enable the development
of better targeted services for improved
viral suppression rates. The Models of
Care and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program study will compare HIV and
primary health outcomes across various
models of care to determine which are
most effective in responding to HIV to
improve health outcomes for people
living with HIV and to prevent HIV
transmissions. The results from this
study will enable improvements or
redesigns of effective delivery of HIV
care among Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program providers, which will in turn
improve HIV clinical outcomes such as
viral suppression.
In both studies, an analysis of the
perceptions of providers and clients will
further support the understanding of the
impact of individual and system-wide
factors on achieving health outcomes.
The two studies will share data to
inform both studies’ objectives, allow
for a larger sample size from which to
generalize conclusions, and reduce the
overall burden of response on RWHAP
providers and clients. The objectives of
both studies will be achieved through
collection of the following data:
• RWHAP client records
abstraction—Medical chart and
administrative records (e.g., service
utilization and health outcomes data);
• RWHAP provider interviews—Site
staff interviewees (in person);
• RWHAP client focus groups
(Models of Care study sites only)—
Clients at selected clinics that represent
a given model of care;
• RWHAP client surveys (HIV Viral
Suppression study sites only)—Clients
with detectable and undetectable viral
load at each clinic; and
• RWHAP client semi-structured
interviews (HIV Viral Suppression study
sites only)—Clients with detectable and
undetectable viral load.
These studies will build upon and
complement HAB’s study focusing on
RWHAP outcomes within the context of
the changing health care landscape; and
will use the RWHAP site survey and
chart abstraction instruments that were
submitted as part of that study. The data
will be collected by a HRSA contractor.
Likely Respondents: RWHAP
Administrators, RWHAP Service
Providers, and RWHAP Clients.
Burden Statement: Burden in this
context means the time expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose or provide the information
requested. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; to
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purpose
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information; to search
data sources; to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. The total annual burden
hours estimated for this ICR are
summarized in the table below. Both
research studies are included in the
table, with burden proportional to the
number of RWHAP provider sites from
which each study will collect data: 25
distinct facilities for Assessing Client
Factors Associated with Detectable HIV
Viral Loads and 50 distinct facilities for
Models of Care and the Ryan White
HIV/AIDS Program. The table below
provides the level of burden inclusive of
both studies.
Total Estimated Annualized Burden—
Hours.
12A—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Type of respondent
Form name
RWHAP Site Administrators
(Private Sector).
RWHAP Service Providers
(Private Sector).
RWHAP Service Providers
(Private Sector).
RWHAP Clients (Individual/
Household).
RWHAP Clients (Individual/
Household).
RWHAP Clients (Individual/
Household).
Medical Records Sample
Selection Guide *.
Provider Interview Guide
(HIV Viral Suppression).
Provider Interview Guide
(Models of Care).
Focus Groups Guide ..........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total
responses
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total
burden hours
75
1
75
1
75
125
1
125
2
250
250
1
250
2
500
240
1
240
1.5
360
Client Survey ......................
500
1
500
0.5
250
Client Semi-Structured
Interview.
150
1
150
0.5
75
18:38 Nov 09, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 217 / Monday, November 13, 2017 / Notices
52311
12A—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Type of respondent
Total .............................
Number of
respondents
Form name
.............................................
1,340
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total
responses
........................
1,340
........................
Total
burden hours
1,510
* The medical records sample selection instrument has been previously submitted as part of the RWHAP Outcomes Study proposed data collection project.
HRSA specifically requests comments
on (1) the necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions, (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection\burden.
In the Summary section, correct to
read: The effective date of the renewed
charter is October 29, 2017.
Amy McNulty,
Acting Director, Division of Executive
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2017–24490 Filed 11–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Amy McNulty,
Acting Director, Division of the Executive
Secretariat.
Health Resources and Services
Administration
[FR Doc. 2017–24491 Filed 11–9–17; 8:45 am]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Public Comment
Request; Be The Match® Patient
Services Survey, OMB No. 0906–
0004—Revision
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Advisory Committee on Rural
Health and Human Services; Notice of
Correction
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Health Resources and Services
Administration
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
HRSA has submitted an Information
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Health and Human Services (HHS).
review and approval. Comments
submitted during the first public review
ACTION: Notice; correction.
of this ICR will be provided to OMB.
OMB will accept further comments from
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and
the public during the review and
Services Administration published a
approval period.
notice in the Federal Register, FR 2017–
DATES: Comments on this ICR should be
23562 (October 31, 2017), announcing
received no later than December 13,
the charter renewal of the National
2017.
Advisory Committee on Rural Health
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
and Human Services (NACRHHS).
including the ICR Title, to the desk
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul officer for HRSA, either by email to
Moore, Designated Federal Officer,
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
NACRHHS, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
fax to 202–395–5806.
Room 17W41C, Rockville, Maryland
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
20857, telephone (301) 443–0835, fax
request a copy of the clearance requests
(301) 443–2803 or by email at pmoore2@ submitted to OMB for review, email Lisa
hrsa.gov.
Wright-Solomon, the HRSA Information
Collection Clearance Officer at
Correction
paperwork@hrsa.gov or call (301) 443–
1984.
In the Federal Register, FR 2017–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
23562 (October 31, 2017), please make
Information Collection Request Title:
the following correction:
Be The Match® Patient Services Survey.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 09, 2017
Jkt 244001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB No.: 0906–0004—Revision.
Abstract: The National Marrow Donor
Program®/Be The Match® is a HRSA
contractor dedicated to helping patients
and families get the support and
information they need to learn about
their disease and treatment options,
prepare for a blood stem cell transplant,
and thrive after a transplant procedure.
The information and resources provided
help individuals navigate the bone
marrow or cord blood transplant
process. Participant feedback is
essential to understand the needs for
transplant support services and
educational information across a diverse
population. This information is used to
determine the helpfulness of existing
services and resources. Feedback is also
used to identify areas for improvement
and develop future programs.
Need and Proposed Use of the
Information: Barriers to access to bone
marrow or cord blood transplant related
care and educational information are
multi-factorial. Feedback from
participants is essential to understand
the changing needs for services and
information as well as to demonstrate
the effectiveness of existing services.
The primary use for information
gathered through the survey is to
determine helpfulness of participants’
initial contact with Be The Match®
Patient Services Coordinators (PSC) and
to identify areas for improvement in the
delivery of services. In addition,
stakeholders use this evaluation data to
make program and resource allocation
decisions.
The survey includes the following
items to measure: (1) Reason for
contacting Be The Match®, (2) if the PSC
was able to answer questions and easy
to understand, (3) if the contact helped
the participant to feel better prepared to
discuss transplant with their care team,
(4) increase in awareness of available
resources, (5) timeliness of response,
and (6) overall satisfaction.
Proposed changes to the survey
instrument include updated references
to the survey title and staff titles.
Changes to the questions include minor
changes to question one, changes to the
instructions for questions three and
four, and minor rewording of question
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52309-52311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24491]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Assessing Client Factors
Associated With Detectable HIV Viral Loads; and Models of Care and the
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department
of Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, HRSA
has submitted an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Comments submitted
during the first public review of this ICR will be provided to OMB. OMB
will accept further comments from the public during the review and
approval period.
DATES: Comments on this ICR should be received no later than December
13, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, including the ICR Title, to the desk
officer for HRSA, either by email to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202-395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request a copy of the clearance
requests submitted to OMB for review, email Lisa Wright-Solomon, the
HRSA Information Collection Clearance Officer at paperwork@hrsa.gov or
call (301) 443-1984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Collection Request Title: Assessing Client Factors
Associated with Detectable HIV Viral Loads and Models of Care and the
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program.
OMB No.: 0906-xxxx--NEW.
Abstract: The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP), first authorized
by the U.S. Congress in 1990, is administered by HRSA's HIV/AIDS Bureau
(HAB). The RWHAP provides medical services, treatment, and/or support
services to 533,036 clients in 2015; 97.0 percent of these clients were
living with HIV. This information collection request covers two
distinct evaluation studies with RWHAP provider sites that will share
components of data collection instruments through shared variables.
Sharing data collection instruments will minimize burden for RWHAP
provider sites collecting this data and will increase the sample size
for data analysis thus resulting in more robust data and greater
generalizability of results.
The first evaluation study, Assessing Client Factors Associated
with Detectable HIV Viral Loads, will explore individuals' specific
facilitators and barriers to achieving and sustaining viral
suppression. Early and effective treatment for HIV has been shown to
greatly reduce associated morbidity and mortality, and prevents
transmission of HIV. In spite of the known benefit of treatment, many
individuals remain out of care or access care only intermittently; the
CDC estimated that in 2013, approximately 45 percent of people living
with HIV (PLWH) in the United States were not virally suppressed,
indicating a significant gap in the percentage of PLWH who are being
successfully engaged and retained in care. In spite of the increased
attention on retention in care and the overarching goal of viral
suppression, little data exist regarding the specific individual
factors that are associated with sub-optimal viral suppression. Such
information is valuable for targeting programs to reach populations
that are currently not achieving HIV viral suppression.
The second evaluation study, Models of Care and the Ryan White HIV/
AIDS Program, seeks to answer the critical questions of what individual
and system-wide factors, including the models of care employed among
RWHAP provider sites, contribute to better health outcomes for PLWH.
While advances in treatment have improved survival in patients with
HIV, longer lives are associated with increased prevalence of adverse
effects of HIV infection and therapeutic complications, concurrent with
medical conditions related to aging processes that would occur in the
absence of HIV. These long-term complications amplify chronic disease
management as a major issue for the HIV population and a challenge for
the delivery of effective health care. Yet little is known about how
the method of health services delivery (the ``model of care'')
contributes to better health outcomes, including HIV-related outcomes.
For example, does it make a difference if a patient receives HIV care
from a primary care provider, a
[[Page 52310]]
specialist, or from a care team that includes both? Understanding the
most effective models of care is important for HIV specialists, primary
care physicians, and other clinicians who care for PLWH as they design
and coordinate a full array of primary care and support services for
their patients. These primary care and support services have a direct
impact on HIV viral suppression, which in turn improves life expectancy
and quality of life and prevents HIV transmission.
The two studies inform each other in that the degree to which
clients achieve and sustain viral suppression may be attributed partly
to the model of care practiced at their clinic. Likewise, the degree to
which its clients have achieved viral suppression may drive a clinic to
practice a particular model of care. The two studies will collect
several identical data elements through their individual collection
instruments, allowing data to be aggregated across the two studies. The
aggregation of data across the two studies will minimize burden for
RWHAP provider sites collecting this data and will increase the sample
size for data analysis thus resulting in more robust data and greater
generalizability of results.
A 60-day Federal Register Notice was published in the Federal
Register on May 18, 2017 (Volume 82, page 22838) which solicited
comments on this data collection. Four comments were received that
focused on how facilities will be selected for participation and the
importance of adequate nutrition for PLWH.
Need and Proposed Use of the Information: The Assessing Client
Factors Associated with Detectable HIV Viral Loads study will identify
characteristics of RWHAP clients and health facilities that are
associated with the ability to achieve and sustain an undetectable
viral load as compared to the characteristics that are associated with
sub-optimal viral suppression. This study will enable the development
of better targeted services for improved viral suppression rates. The
Models of Care and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program study will compare
HIV and primary health outcomes across various models of care to
determine which are most effective in responding to HIV to improve
health outcomes for people living with HIV and to prevent HIV
transmissions. The results from this study will enable improvements or
redesigns of effective delivery of HIV care among Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program providers, which will in turn improve HIV clinical outcomes
such as viral suppression.
In both studies, an analysis of the perceptions of providers and
clients will further support the understanding of the impact of
individual and system-wide factors on achieving health outcomes. The
two studies will share data to inform both studies' objectives, allow
for a larger sample size from which to generalize conclusions, and
reduce the overall burden of response on RWHAP providers and clients.
The objectives of both studies will be achieved through collection of
the following data:
RWHAP client records abstraction--Medical chart and
administrative records (e.g., service utilization and health outcomes
data);
RWHAP provider interviews--Site staff interviewees (in
person);
RWHAP client focus groups (Models of Care study sites
only)--Clients at selected clinics that represent a given model of
care;
RWHAP client surveys (HIV Viral Suppression study sites
only)--Clients with detectable and undetectable viral load at each
clinic; and
RWHAP client semi-structured interviews (HIV Viral
Suppression study sites only)--Clients with detectable and undetectable
viral load.
These studies will build upon and complement HAB's study focusing
on RWHAP outcomes within the context of the changing health care
landscape; and will use the RWHAP site survey and chart abstraction
instruments that were submitted as part of that study. The data will be
collected by a HRSA contractor.
Likely Respondents: RWHAP Administrators, RWHAP Service Providers,
and RWHAP Clients.
Burden Statement: Burden in this context means the time expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide the
information requested. This includes the time needed to review
instructions; to develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information; to search data sources; to complete and
review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise
disclose the information. The total annual burden hours estimated for
this ICR are summarized in the table below. Both research studies are
included in the table, with burden proportional to the number of RWHAP
provider sites from which each study will collect data: 25 distinct
facilities for Assessing Client Factors Associated with Detectable HIV
Viral Loads and 50 distinct facilities for Models of Care and the Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program. The table below provides the level of burden
inclusive of both studies.
Total Estimated Annualized Burden--Hours.
12A--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondent Form name Number of responses per Total per response Total burden
respondents respondent responses (in hours) hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RWHAP Site Administrators (Private Sector) Medical Records Sample 75 1 75 1 75
Selection Guide *.
RWHAP Service Providers (Private Sector).. Provider Interview Guide 125 1 125 2 250
(HIV Viral Suppression).
RWHAP Service Providers (Private Sector).. Provider Interview Guide 250 1 250 2 500
(Models of Care).
RWHAP Clients (Individual/Household)...... Focus Groups Guide.......... 240 1 240 1.5 360
RWHAP Clients (Individual/Household)...... Client Survey............... 500 1 500 0.5 250
RWHAP Clients (Individual/Household)...... Client Semi-Structured 150 1 150 0.5 75
Interview.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52311]]
Total................................. ............................ 1,340 .............. 1,340 .............. 1,510
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The medical records sample selection instrument has been previously submitted as part of the RWHAP Outcomes Study proposed data collection project.
HRSA specifically requests comments on (1) the necessity and
utility of the proposed information collection for the proper
performance of the agency's functions, (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected, and (4) the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection\burden.
Amy McNulty,
Acting Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2017-24491 Filed 11-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P