Medical Devices; Exemption From Premarket Notification; Class II Devices; Autosomal Recessive Carrier Screening Gene Mutation Detection System, 51567-51570 [2017-24162]
Download as PDF
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
range of age and educational levels and
have no prior experience with the test
or its manufacturer. These factors shall
be well defined in the inclusion and
exclusion criteria.
(ii) All sources of bias must be
predefined and accounted for in the
study results with regard to both
responders and non-responders.
(iii) The testing must follow a format
where users have limited time to
complete the studies (such as an onsite
survey format and a one-time visit with
a cap on the maximum amount of time
that a participant has to complete the
tests).
(iv) Users must be randomly assigned
to study arms. Test reports in the user
comprehension study given to users
must define the target condition being
tested and related symptoms, explain
the intended use and limitations of the
test, explain the relevant ethnicities in
regard to the variant tested, explain
genetic health risks and relevance to the
user’s ethnicity, and assess participants’
ability to understand the following
comprehension concepts: The test’s
limitations, purpose, appropriate action,
test results, and other factors that may
have an impact on the test results.
(v) Study participants must be
¨
untrained, be naıve to the test subject of
the study, and be provided the labeling
prior to the start of the user
comprehension study.
(vi) The user comprehension study
must meet the predefined primary
endpoint criteria, including a minimum
of a 90 percent or greater overall
comprehension rate (i.e., selection of the
correct answer) for each comprehension
concept. Other acceptance criteria may
be acceptable depending on the concept
being tested. Meeting or exceeding this
overall comprehension rate
demonstrates that the materials
presented to the user are adequate for
over-the-counter use.
(vii) The analysis of the user
comprehension results must include
results regarding reports that are
provided for each gene/variant/ethnicity
tested, statistical methods used to
analyze all data sets, and completion
rate, non-responder rate, and reasons for
nonresponse/data exclusion. A
summary table of comprehension rates
regarding comprehension concepts (e.g.,
purpose of test, test results, test
limitations, ethnicity relevance for the
test results, etc.) for each study report
must be included.
(4) The intended use of the device
must not include the following
indications for use:
(i) Prenatal testing;
(ii) Determining predisposition for
cancer where the result of the test may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
lead to prophylactic screening,
confirmatory procedures, or treatments
that may incur morbidity or mortality to
the patient;
(iii) Assessing the presence of genetic
variants that impact the metabolism,
exposure, response, risk of adverse
events, dosing, or mechanisms of
prescription or over-the-counter
medications; or
(iv) Assessing the presence of
deterministic autosomal dominant
variants.
Dated: November 1, 2017.
Lauren Silvis,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2017–24159 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–3455]
Medical Devices; Exemption From
Premarket Notification; Class II
Devices; Autosomal Recessive Carrier
Screening Gene Mutation Detection
System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
publishing an order to exempt
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection systems from
the premarket notification requirements,
subject to certain limitations. This
exemption from 510(k), subject to
certain limitations, is immediately in
effect for autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection
systems. This exemption will decrease
regulatory burdens on the medical
device industry and will eliminate
private costs and expenditures required
to comply with certain Federal
regulations. FDA is also amending the
codified language for the autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene
mutation detection system devices
classification regulation to reflect this
final determination.
DATES: This order is effective November
7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Tjoe, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4550, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5866.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51567
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Background
Section 510(k) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and the implementing
regulations, 21 CFR part 807 subpart E,
require persons who intend to market a
device to submit and obtain FDA
clearance of a premarket notification
(510(k)) containing information that
allows FDA to determine whether the
new device is ‘‘substantially equivalent’’
within the meaning of section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a
legally marketed device that does not
require premarket approval.
On December 13, 2016, the 21st
Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 114–255)
(Cures Act) was signed into law. Section
3054 of the Cures Act amended section
510(m) of the FD&C Act. As amended,
section 510(m)(2) provides that, 1
calendar day after the date of
publication of the final list under
paragraph (1)(B), FDA may exempt a
class II device from the requirement to
submit a report under section 510(k) of
the FD&C Act, upon its own initiative or
a petition of an interested person, if
FDA determines that a 510(k) is not
necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. This section requires FDA
to publish in the Federal Register a
notice of intent to exempt a device, or
of the petition, and to provide a 60calendar-day comment period. Within
120 days of publication of such notice,
FDA must publish an order in the
Federal Register that sets forth its final
determination regarding the exemption
of the device that was the subject of the
notice. If FDA fails to respond to a
petition under this section within 180
days of receiving it, the petition shall be
deemed granted.
II. Criteria for Exemption
There are a number of factors FDA
may consider to determine whether a
510(k) is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of a class II device. These
factors are discussed in the January 21,
1998, Federal Register notice (63 FR
3142) and subsequently in the guidance
the Agency issued on February 19, 1998,
entitled ‘‘Procedures for Class II Device
Exemptions from Premarket
Notification, Guidance for Industry and
CDRH Staff’’ (referred to herein as the
Class II 510(k) Exemption Guidance)
(Ref. 1).
III. Device Description
On February 19, 2015, FDA
completed its review of a De Novo
request for classification of the 23andMe
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
51568
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Personal Genome Service (PGS) Carrier
Screening Test for Bloom syndrome.
FDA classified the 23andMe PGS Carrier
Screening Test for Bloom syndrome,
and substantially equivalent devices of
this generic type, into class II (special
controls) under the generic name
‘‘Autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system.’’ This
type of device is a qualitative in vitro
molecular diagnostic system used for
genotyping of clinically relevant
variants in genomic DNA isolated from
human specimens intended for
prescription use or over-the-counter
(OTC) use. The device is intended for
autosomal recessive disease carrier
screening in adults of reproductive age.
The device is not intended for copy
number variation, cytogenetic, or
biochemical testing.
FDA believes that De Novo
classification will enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovation, in part
by reducing regulatory burdens. When
FDA classifies a device into class I or II
via the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for determining
substantial equivalence for future
devices within that type (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or a premarket
approval application in order to market
a substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
In the Federal Register of October 27,
2015 (80 FR 65774), FDA published a
notice (‘‘October 2015 notice’’)
announcing its intent to exempt
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system devices
from premarket notification
requirements, subject to certain
limitations, and provided opportunity
for interested persons to submit
comments by November 27, 2015. After
reviewing comments received
(summarized in section IV), FDA is now
providing its final determination for
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system devices
by exempting this type of device from
premarket notification requirements,
subject to certain limitations as
identified in this notice. FDA is also
amending the codified language for the
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system devices
classification regulation to reflect this
final determination. Persons with
pending 510(k) submissions for devices
that are now exempt from premarket
notification, subject to the limitations,
should withdraw their submissions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
IV. Comments on the Proposed
Exemption and FDA Response
In response to the October 2015 notice
announcing FDA’s intent to exempt
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system devices
from premarket notification
requirements, FDA received
submissions from three commenters—a
device industry manufacturer, a
professional organization, and a health
care organization—supporting an
exemption from premarket notification
for this type of device.
To make it easier to identify
comments and our responses, the word
‘‘Comment’’ and a comment number
appear in parentheses before each
comment’s description, and the word
‘‘Response’’ in parentheses precedes
each response. Similar comments are
grouped together under the same
number. Specific issues raised by the
comments and the Agency’s responses
follow.
(Comment 1) Two commenters
requested that FDA clarify that the list
of autosomal recessive carrier diseases
included in the October 2015 notice is
not exhaustive or expand the list of
diseases and conditions covered by the
exemption to include all diseases and
conditions described in the scientific
literature as inherited in an autosomal
recessive manner. One commenter
further requested that FDA clarify that
the determination of the applicability of
§ 866.5940 (21 CFR 866.5940) should be
based upon scientific and clinical
literature as to the autosomal recessive
nature of the disease or condition.
(Response) The diseases and
conditions listed in table 1 of the
October 2015 notice were based upon a
limited review of the scientific and
clinical literature at that time. After
consideration of the public comments,
FDA agrees that the autosomal recessive
diseases and conditions listed in that
table should be treated as illustrative,
and not an exhaustive list. Based on
FDA’s review of current scientific and
clinical literature, FDA would not
consider screening for autosomal
recessive carrier status by detection of
clinically relevant gene mutations
associated with a large variety of
diseases and conditions, in addition to
those listed in table 1 of the October
2015 notice, to constitute a different
intended use from that of a legally
marketed device in the generic type
under § 866.5940 for purposes of § 866.9
(21 CFR 866.9). Because FDA agrees that
the list of diseases and conditions
provided in the October 2015 notice is
not comprehensive, and that
applicability of § 866.5940 should be
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
based upon scientific and clinical
literature as to the autosomal recessive
nature of a particular disease or
condition, we are not providing a
revised list in this final order.
(Comment 2) One commenter
requested clarification that § 866.5940
applies to OTC carrier detection devices
for the determination of carrier status by
detection of clinically relevant gene
mutations associated with cystic
fibrosis.
(Response) In the October 2015
notice, FDA stated ‘‘[a] gene mutation
detection system indicated for the
determination of carrier status by
detection of clinically relevant gene
mutations associated with Cystic
Fibrosis is not 510(k)-exempt since it is
a class II device subject to premarket
notification and special controls under
21 CFR 866.5900—Cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator
(CFTR) gene mutation detection
system.’’ Similarly, in the final order
announcing the classification of an
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system into
class II (80 FR 65626, October 27, 2015),
FDA stated ‘‘A gene mutation detection
system indicated for the determination
of carrier status by detection of
clinically relevant gene mutations
associated with cystic fibrosis is
separately classified under 21 CFR
866.5900—Cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator
(CFTR) gene mutation detection system
(class II, special controls), and is thus
not included in the de novo
classification.’’
However, after considering the
comments regarding this exemption
action, and after reviewing the devices
that are classified as CTFR gene
mutation detection systems under
§ 866.5900 (21 CFR 866.5900), FDA is
now clarifying that an OTC gene
mutation detection system indicated for
the determination of autosomal
recessive carrier status by detection of
clinically relevant gene mutations
associated with cystic fibrosis (‘‘OTC
Cystic Fibrosis carrier screening test’’) is
included within the scope of the
classification regulation for an
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system
(§ 866.5940) and this exemption action.
At the time FDA classified a CFTR
gene mutation detection system under
§ 866.5900, we were not aware of any
OTC Cystic Fibrosis carrier screening
tests, and it was not our intent at the
time to classify this test for OTC use. We
also note that, to date, the only Cystic
Fibrosis carrier screening tests that have
been cleared by FDA under § 866.5900
are for prescription use only. Finally,
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
FDA does not believe that the special
controls under § 866.5900(b) would
reasonably assure the safety and
effectiveness of OTC Cystic Fibrosis
carrier screening tests, as such special
controls were developed to be
applicable to prescription use only tests.
For example, when classifying a CFTR
gene mutation detection system into
class II, FDA determined that the special
controls under § 866.5900(b), in
conjunction with general controls,
provided a reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
One risk to health that FDA identified
was that ‘‘errors in interpretation of
results may lead to improper clinical
recommendations and medical patient
management.’’ The special controls
concerning generation of test results,
interpretation of test results, and
precautions for interpretation of the test
results were developed only for
prescription use only tests with health
care providers in mind (see Section 6—
Device Description; Test Results/
Reporting, Section 10—Labeling;
Interpretation of Results, and Section
10—Labeling; Precautions for
interpretations of the ‘‘Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: CFTR
Gene Mutation Detection Systems’’
(October 26, 2005) (Ref. 2).
Therefore, FDA is clarifying that with
regard to gene mutation detection
systems indicated for the determination
of carrier status by detection of
clinically relevant gene mutations
associated with cystic fibrosis, the
classification regulation § 866.5900 is
only applicable to prescription use only
tests. FDA is further clarifying that we
would not consider a gene mutation
detection system indicated for use as an
OTC device for the determination of
carrier status by detection of clinically
relevant gene mutations associated with
cystic fibrosis to constitute a different
intended use from that of a legally
marketed device in the generic type
§ 866.5940 for purposes of § 866.9(a). As
such, OTC Cystic Fibrosis carrier
screening tests are within the scope of
the classification regulation for an
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system
(§ 866.5940) and are included within the
scope of this action.
(Comment 3) One commenter
requested that the exemption be
expanded to include carrier screening
for X-linked conditions. The commenter
further requested that the exemption be
expanded to allow for the reporting of
diagnostic results.
(Response) The October 2015 notice
and this final order concern the
exemption from premarket notification
of autosomal recessive carrier screening
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
gene mutation detection systems in the
generic type § 866.5940. Devices within
the scope of the § 866.5940 regulation
for autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection systems are
intended for autosomal recessive carrier
screening in adults of reproductive age.
The requested indications for carrier
screening for X-linked conditions and
for reporting of diagnostic results are
outside the scope of the § 866.5940
regulation. As this final order concerns
only exemption of devices within the
§ 866.5940 regulation, the request to
expand the exemption to include carrier
screening for X-linked conditions or for
the reporting of diagnostic results is
outside the scope of this action.
(Comment 4) The three commenters
were generally supportive of the
regulation and special controls
established for the device type,
including for the special controls that
relate to genetic counseling (e.g.,
§ 866.5940(b)(1) and (b)(4)(iii)(A)). Two
commenters requested FDA provide
additional recommendations that relate
to the special control requirements
related to genetic counseling.
(Response) FDA appreciates the
comments supporting the regulation and
special controls established for the
device type. FDA believes that the class
II special controls established for the
device type, along with the applicable
general controls, provides reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device type. FDA notes that while
the comments received did not propose
specific amendments to the special
control requirements, such discussion is
outside the scope of the October 2015
notice and this final order, which
concerns the exemption from premarket
notification of autosomal recessive
carrier screening gene mutation
detection systems in the generic type
§ 866.5940.
V. Exemption for Autosomal Recessive
Carrier Screening Gene Mutation
Detection System Devices
FDA has assessed the need for 510(k)
clearance for this type of device by
considering the factors discussed in the
January 21, 1998, Federal Register
notice (63 FR 3142) and subsequently in
the Class II 510(k) Exemption Guidance,
as previously discussed in the October
2015 notice, and has determined they
weigh in favor of 510(k) exemption,
subject to certain limitations discussed
later in this order. Therefore, for the
reasons set forth in the Federal Register
of October 27, 2015, and as informed by
the comments received and FDA’s
understanding and experience with
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene detection systems, FDA has
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51569
determined that premarket notification
is not necessary to assure the safety and
effectiveness of autosomal recessive
carrier screening gene detection
systems, so long as the limitations on
exemption described later in this
document are not met.
VI. Limitations on Exemption
This exemption from 510(k) for an
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system applies
only to those devices that have existing
or reasonably foreseeable characteristics
of commercially distributed devices
within that generic type, or, in the case
of in vitro diagnostic devices, for which
a misdiagnosis, as a result of using the
device, would not be associated with
high morbidity or mortality. Therefore,
a manufacturer of an autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene
mutation detection system would still
be required to submit a premarket
notification to FDA before introducing a
device or delivering it for introduction
into commercial distribution when the
device meets any of the conditions
described in § 866.9, except § 866.9(c)(2)
to the extent it may include an
autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene mutation detection system, for the
reasons explained in the October 2015
notice.
Specifically, an autosomal recessive
carrier screening gene mutation
detection system is not exempt from the
premarket notification requirement if
such device: (1) Has an intended use
that is different from the intended use
of a legally marketed device in that
generic type; e.g., the device is intended
for a different medical purpose, or the
device is intended for lay use where the
former intended use was by health care
professionals only; or (2) operates using
a different fundamental scientific
technology than that used by a legally
marketed device in that generic type;
e.g., a surgical instrument cuts tissue
with a laser beam rather than with a
sharpened metal blade, or an in vitro
diagnostic device detects or identifies
infectious agents by using a DNA probe
or nucleic acid hybridization or
amplification technology rather than
culture or immunoassay technology; or
(3) is an in vitro device that is intended:
for use in the diagnosis, monitoring or
screening of neoplastic diseases with
the exception of immunohistochemical
devices; for measuring an analyte which
serves as a surrogate marker for
screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of
life threatening diseases, such as
acquired immune deficiency syndrome
(AIDS), chronic or active hepatitis,
tuberculosis, or myocardial infarction,
or to monitor therapy; for assessing the
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
51570
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
risk of cardiovascular diseases; for use
in diabetes management; for identifying
or inferring the identity of a
microorganism directly from clinical
material; for detection of antibodies to
microorganisms other than
immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG assays
when the results are not qualitative, or
are used to determine immunity, or the
assay is intended for use in matrices
other than serum or plasma; for
noninvasive testing; or for near-patient
testing (point of care).
Exemption from the requirement of
premarket notification does not exempt
a device from other applicable
regulatory controls under the FD&C Act,
including the applicable general and
special controls. Indeed, FDA’s decision
to grant 510(k) exemption for these
devices is based, in part, on the special
controls, in combination with general
controls, providing sufficiently rigorous
mitigations for the risks identified for
this generic type.
This exemption from 510(k), subject
to the limitations described above, is
immediately in effect for autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene
mutation detection systems. This
exemption will decrease regulatory
burdens on the medical device industry
and will eliminate private costs and
expenditures required to comply with
Federal regulation. Specifically,
regulated industry will no longer have
to invest time and resources in
premarket notifications, including
preparation of documents and data for
submission to FDA, payment of user
fees associated with 510(k) submissions,
and responding to questions and
requests for additional information from
FDA during 510(k) review for devices in
this exempted type.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.34(b) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR part 807, subpart, E have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120 and the collections of
information in 21 CFR parts 801 and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
809 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0485.
IX. References
Dated: November 1, 2017.
Lauren Silvis,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2017–24162 Filed 11–6–17; 8:45 am]
The following references are on
display in the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES) and are available
for viewing by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday; they are also available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses, as of the date
this document publishes in the Federal
Register, but Web sites are subject to
change over time.
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
1. FDA Guidance, ‘‘Procedures for Class II
Device Exemptions from Premarket
Notification, Guidance for Industry and
CDRH Staff,’’ February 19, 1998,
available at https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/UCM080199.pdf.
2. FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
‘‘Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: CFTR Gene Mutation
Detection Systems,’’ October 26, 2005,
available at: https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/ucm071104.pdf.
Rule on Attorney-Client Privilege for
Trials Before the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 866
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. In § 866.5940, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
■
§ 866.5940 Autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection system.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter
subject to the limitations in § 866.9,
except § 866.9(c)(2). Autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene
mutation detection system must comply
with the following special controls:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
37 CFR Part 42
[Docket No. PTO–P–2016–0029]
RIN 0651–AD10
Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office, U.S. Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule on attorneyclient privilege amends the existing
rules relating to the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (Office or
USPTO) trial practice for inter partes
review, post-grant review, the
transitional program for covered
business method patents, and derivation
proceedings that implemented
provisions of the Leahy-Smith America
Invents Act (‘‘AIA’’) providing for trials
before the Office.
DATES: This rule is effective on
December 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Elliott, Attorney Advisor, by
telephone at (571) 272–7024 or by email
at edward.elliott@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary: Purpose: This
final rule clarifies situations where
privilege is recognized for
communications between clients and
their domestic or foreign patent
attorneys and patent agents.
SUMMARY:
Background
In February 2015, the USPTO held a
roundtable and solicited comments on
attorney-client privilege issues. See
Notice of Roundtable and Request for
Comments on Domestic and
International Issues Related to
Privileged Communications Between
Patent Practitioners and Their Clients,
80 FR 3953 (Jan. 26, 2015). As part of
that process, the USPTO requested
comments on whether communications
between patent applicants or owners
with their U.S. patent agents or foreign
patent practitioners should be
recognized as privileged to the same
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51567-51570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24162]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-3455]
Medical Devices; Exemption From Premarket Notification; Class II
Devices; Autosomal Recessive Carrier Screening Gene Mutation Detection
System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is publishing
an order to exempt autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation
detection systems from the premarket notification requirements, subject
to certain limitations. This exemption from 510(k), subject to certain
limitations, is immediately in effect for autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection systems. This exemption will decrease
regulatory burdens on the medical device industry and will eliminate
private costs and expenditures required to comply with certain Federal
regulations. FDA is also amending the codified language for the
autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection system
devices classification regulation to reflect this final determination.
DATES: This order is effective November 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Tjoe, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4550, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5866.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Background
Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and the implementing regulations, 21 CFR
part 807 subpart E, require persons who intend to market a device to
submit and obtain FDA clearance of a premarket notification (510(k))
containing information that allows FDA to determine whether the new
device is ``substantially equivalent'' within the meaning of section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a legally marketed device
that does not require premarket approval.
On December 13, 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 114-255)
(Cures Act) was signed into law. Section 3054 of the Cures Act amended
section 510(m) of the FD&C Act. As amended, section 510(m)(2) provides
that, 1 calendar day after the date of publication of the final list
under paragraph (1)(B), FDA may exempt a class II device from the
requirement to submit a report under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act,
upon its own initiative or a petition of an interested person, if FDA
determines that a 510(k) is not necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. This section
requires FDA to publish in the Federal Register a notice of intent to
exempt a device, or of the petition, and to provide a 60-calendar-day
comment period. Within 120 days of publication of such notice, FDA must
publish an order in the Federal Register that sets forth its final
determination regarding the exemption of the device that was the
subject of the notice. If FDA fails to respond to a petition under this
section within 180 days of receiving it, the petition shall be deemed
granted.
II. Criteria for Exemption
There are a number of factors FDA may consider to determine whether
a 510(k) is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of a class II device. These factors are discussed in the
January 21, 1998, Federal Register notice (63 FR 3142) and subsequently
in the guidance the Agency issued on February 19, 1998, entitled
``Procedures for Class II Device Exemptions from Premarket
Notification, Guidance for Industry and CDRH Staff'' (referred to
herein as the Class II 510(k) Exemption Guidance) (Ref. 1).
III. Device Description
On February 19, 2015, FDA completed its review of a De Novo request
for classification of the 23andMe
[[Page 51568]]
Personal Genome Service (PGS) Carrier Screening Test for Bloom
syndrome. FDA classified the 23andMe PGS Carrier Screening Test for
Bloom syndrome, and substantially equivalent devices of this generic
type, into class II (special controls) under the generic name
``Autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection
system.'' This type of device is a qualitative in vitro molecular
diagnostic system used for genotyping of clinically relevant variants
in genomic DNA isolated from human specimens intended for prescription
use or over-the-counter (OTC) use. The device is intended for autosomal
recessive disease carrier screening in adults of reproductive age. The
device is not intended for copy number variation, cytogenetic, or
biochemical testing.
FDA believes that De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for determining
substantial equivalence for future devices within that type (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other device sponsors do not
have to submit a De Novo request or a premarket approval application in
order to market a substantially equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can
use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their
device.
In the Federal Register of October 27, 2015 (80 FR 65774), FDA
published a notice (``October 2015 notice'') announcing its intent to
exempt autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection
system devices from premarket notification requirements, subject to
certain limitations, and provided opportunity for interested persons to
submit comments by November 27, 2015. After reviewing comments received
(summarized in section IV), FDA is now providing its final
determination for autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation
detection system devices by exempting this type of device from
premarket notification requirements, subject to certain limitations as
identified in this notice. FDA is also amending the codified language
for the autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection
system devices classification regulation to reflect this final
determination. Persons with pending 510(k) submissions for devices that
are now exempt from premarket notification, subject to the limitations,
should withdraw their submissions.
IV. Comments on the Proposed Exemption and FDA Response
In response to the October 2015 notice announcing FDA's intent to
exempt autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection
system devices from premarket notification requirements, FDA received
submissions from three commenters--a device industry manufacturer, a
professional organization, and a health care organization--supporting
an exemption from premarket notification for this type of device.
To make it easier to identify comments and our responses, the word
``Comment'' and a comment number appear in parentheses before each
comment's description, and the word ``Response'' in parentheses
precedes each response. Similar comments are grouped together under the
same number. Specific issues raised by the comments and the Agency's
responses follow.
(Comment 1) Two commenters requested that FDA clarify that the list
of autosomal recessive carrier diseases included in the October 2015
notice is not exhaustive or expand the list of diseases and conditions
covered by the exemption to include all diseases and conditions
described in the scientific literature as inherited in an autosomal
recessive manner. One commenter further requested that FDA clarify that
the determination of the applicability of Sec. 866.5940 (21 CFR
866.5940) should be based upon scientific and clinical literature as to
the autosomal recessive nature of the disease or condition.
(Response) The diseases and conditions listed in table 1 of the
October 2015 notice were based upon a limited review of the scientific
and clinical literature at that time. After consideration of the public
comments, FDA agrees that the autosomal recessive diseases and
conditions listed in that table should be treated as illustrative, and
not an exhaustive list. Based on FDA's review of current scientific and
clinical literature, FDA would not consider screening for autosomal
recessive carrier status by detection of clinically relevant gene
mutations associated with a large variety of diseases and conditions,
in addition to those listed in table 1 of the October 2015 notice, to
constitute a different intended use from that of a legally marketed
device in the generic type under Sec. 866.5940 for purposes of Sec.
866.9 (21 CFR 866.9). Because FDA agrees that the list of diseases and
conditions provided in the October 2015 notice is not comprehensive,
and that applicability of Sec. 866.5940 should be based upon
scientific and clinical literature as to the autosomal recessive nature
of a particular disease or condition, we are not providing a revised
list in this final order.
(Comment 2) One commenter requested clarification that Sec.
866.5940 applies to OTC carrier detection devices for the determination
of carrier status by detection of clinically relevant gene mutations
associated with cystic fibrosis.
(Response) In the October 2015 notice, FDA stated ``[a] gene
mutation detection system indicated for the determination of carrier
status by detection of clinically relevant gene mutations associated
with Cystic Fibrosis is not 510(k)-exempt since it is a class II device
subject to premarket notification and special controls under 21 CFR
866.5900--Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)
gene mutation detection system.'' Similarly, in the final order
announcing the classification of an autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection system into class II (80 FR 65626,
October 27, 2015), FDA stated ``A gene mutation detection system
indicated for the determination of carrier status by detection of
clinically relevant gene mutations associated with cystic fibrosis is
separately classified under 21 CFR 866.5900--Cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation detection
system (class II, special controls), and is thus not included in the de
novo classification.''
However, after considering the comments regarding this exemption
action, and after reviewing the devices that are classified as CTFR
gene mutation detection systems under Sec. 866.5900 (21 CFR 866.5900),
FDA is now clarifying that an OTC gene mutation detection system
indicated for the determination of autosomal recessive carrier status
by detection of clinically relevant gene mutations associated with
cystic fibrosis (``OTC Cystic Fibrosis carrier screening test'') is
included within the scope of the classification regulation for an
autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection system
(Sec. 866.5940) and this exemption action.
At the time FDA classified a CFTR gene mutation detection system
under Sec. 866.5900, we were not aware of any OTC Cystic Fibrosis
carrier screening tests, and it was not our intent at the time to
classify this test for OTC use. We also note that, to date, the only
Cystic Fibrosis carrier screening tests that have been cleared by FDA
under Sec. 866.5900 are for prescription use only. Finally,
[[Page 51569]]
FDA does not believe that the special controls under Sec. 866.5900(b)
would reasonably assure the safety and effectiveness of OTC Cystic
Fibrosis carrier screening tests, as such special controls were
developed to be applicable to prescription use only tests. For example,
when classifying a CFTR gene mutation detection system into class II,
FDA determined that the special controls under Sec. 866.5900(b), in
conjunction with general controls, provided a reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of the device. One risk to health that FDA
identified was that ``errors in interpretation of results may lead to
improper clinical recommendations and medical patient management.'' The
special controls concerning generation of test results, interpretation
of test results, and precautions for interpretation of the test results
were developed only for prescription use only tests with health care
providers in mind (see Section 6--Device Description; Test Results/
Reporting, Section 10--Labeling; Interpretation of Results, and Section
10--Labeling; Precautions for interpretations of the ``Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: CFTR Gene Mutation Detection Systems''
(October 26, 2005) (Ref. 2).
Therefore, FDA is clarifying that with regard to gene mutation
detection systems indicated for the determination of carrier status by
detection of clinically relevant gene mutations associated with cystic
fibrosis, the classification regulation Sec. 866.5900 is only
applicable to prescription use only tests. FDA is further clarifying
that we would not consider a gene mutation detection system indicated
for use as an OTC device for the determination of carrier status by
detection of clinically relevant gene mutations associated with cystic
fibrosis to constitute a different intended use from that of a legally
marketed device in the generic type Sec. 866.5940 for purposes of
Sec. 866.9(a). As such, OTC Cystic Fibrosis carrier screening tests
are within the scope of the classification regulation for an autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection system (Sec.
866.5940) and are included within the scope of this action.
(Comment 3) One commenter requested that the exemption be expanded
to include carrier screening for X-linked conditions. The commenter
further requested that the exemption be expanded to allow for the
reporting of diagnostic results.
(Response) The October 2015 notice and this final order concern the
exemption from premarket notification of autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection systems in the generic type Sec.
866.5940. Devices within the scope of the Sec. 866.5940 regulation for
autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection systems
are intended for autosomal recessive carrier screening in adults of
reproductive age. The requested indications for carrier screening for
X-linked conditions and for reporting of diagnostic results are outside
the scope of the Sec. 866.5940 regulation. As this final order
concerns only exemption of devices within the Sec. 866.5940
regulation, the request to expand the exemption to include carrier
screening for X-linked conditions or for the reporting of diagnostic
results is outside the scope of this action.
(Comment 4) The three commenters were generally supportive of the
regulation and special controls established for the device type,
including for the special controls that relate to genetic counseling
(e.g., Sec. 866.5940(b)(1) and (b)(4)(iii)(A)). Two commenters
requested FDA provide additional recommendations that relate to the
special control requirements related to genetic counseling.
(Response) FDA appreciates the comments supporting the regulation
and special controls established for the device type. FDA believes that
the class II special controls established for the device type, along
with the applicable general controls, provides reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of the device type. FDA notes that while
the comments received did not propose specific amendments to the
special control requirements, such discussion is outside the scope of
the October 2015 notice and this final order, which concerns the
exemption from premarket notification of autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection systems in the generic type Sec.
866.5940.
V. Exemption for Autosomal Recessive Carrier Screening Gene Mutation
Detection System Devices
FDA has assessed the need for 510(k) clearance for this type of
device by considering the factors discussed in the January 21, 1998,
Federal Register notice (63 FR 3142) and subsequently in the Class II
510(k) Exemption Guidance, as previously discussed in the October 2015
notice, and has determined they weigh in favor of 510(k) exemption,
subject to certain limitations discussed later in this order.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the Federal Register of October
27, 2015, and as informed by the comments received and FDA's
understanding and experience with autosomal recessive carrier screening
gene detection systems, FDA has determined that premarket notification
is not necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene detection systems, so long as the
limitations on exemption described later in this document are not met.
VI. Limitations on Exemption
This exemption from 510(k) for an autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection system applies only to those devices
that have existing or reasonably foreseeable characteristics of
commercially distributed devices within that generic type, or, in the
case of in vitro diagnostic devices, for which a misdiagnosis, as a
result of using the device, would not be associated with high morbidity
or mortality. Therefore, a manufacturer of an autosomal recessive
carrier screening gene mutation detection system would still be
required to submit a premarket notification to FDA before introducing a
device or delivering it for introduction into commercial distribution
when the device meets any of the conditions described in Sec. 866.9,
except Sec. 866.9(c)(2) to the extent it may include an autosomal
recessive carrier screening gene mutation detection system, for the
reasons explained in the October 2015 notice.
Specifically, an autosomal recessive carrier screening gene
mutation detection system is not exempt from the premarket notification
requirement if such device: (1) Has an intended use that is different
from the intended use of a legally marketed device in that generic
type; e.g., the device is intended for a different medical purpose, or
the device is intended for lay use where the former intended use was by
health care professionals only; or (2) operates using a different
fundamental scientific technology than that used by a legally marketed
device in that generic type; e.g., a surgical instrument cuts tissue
with a laser beam rather than with a sharpened metal blade, or an in
vitro diagnostic device detects or identifies infectious agents by
using a DNA probe or nucleic acid hybridization or amplification
technology rather than culture or immunoassay technology; or (3) is an
in vitro device that is intended: for use in the diagnosis, monitoring
or screening of neoplastic diseases with the exception of
immunohistochemical devices; for measuring an analyte which serves as a
surrogate marker for screening, diagnosis, or monitoring of life
threatening diseases, such as acquired immune deficiency syndrome
(AIDS), chronic or active hepatitis, tuberculosis, or myocardial
infarction, or to monitor therapy; for assessing the
[[Page 51570]]
risk of cardiovascular diseases; for use in diabetes management; for
identifying or inferring the identity of a microorganism directly from
clinical material; for detection of antibodies to microorganisms other
than immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG assays when the results are not
qualitative, or are used to determine immunity, or the assay is
intended for use in matrices other than serum or plasma; for
noninvasive testing; or for near-patient testing (point of care).
Exemption from the requirement of premarket notification does not
exempt a device from other applicable regulatory controls under the
FD&C Act, including the applicable general and special controls.
Indeed, FDA's decision to grant 510(k) exemption for these devices is
based, in part, on the special controls, in combination with general
controls, providing sufficiently rigorous mitigations for the risks
identified for this generic type.
This exemption from 510(k), subject to the limitations described
above, is immediately in effect for autosomal recessive carrier
screening gene mutation detection systems. This exemption will decrease
regulatory burdens on the medical device industry and will eliminate
private costs and expenditures required to comply with Federal
regulation. Specifically, regulated industry will no longer have to
invest time and resources in premarket notifications, including
preparation of documents and data for submission to FDA, payment of
user fees associated with 510(k) submissions, and responding to
questions and requests for additional information from FDA during
510(k) review for devices in this exempted type.
VII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 807, subpart, E have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0120 and the collections of
information in 21 CFR parts 801 and 809 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0485.
IX. References
The following references are on display in the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES) and are available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the Web site addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over time.
1. FDA Guidance, ``Procedures for Class II Device Exemptions from
Premarket Notification, Guidance for Industry and CDRH Staff,''
February 19, 1998, available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM080199.pdf.
2. FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff ``Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: CFTR Gene Mutation Detection Systems,''
October 26, 2005, available at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071104.pdf.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
866 is amended as follows:
PART 866--IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 866 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. In Sec. 866.5940, revise paragraph (b) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 866.5940 Autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation
detection system.
* * * * *
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is
exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part
807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in Sec. 866.9, except
Sec. 866.9(c)(2). Autosomal recessive carrier screening gene mutation
detection system must comply with the following special controls:
* * * * *
Dated: November 1, 2017.
Lauren Silvis,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2017-24162 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P