Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Golden Tilefish Fishery; 2018 and Projected 2019-2020 Specifications, 51578-51581 [2017-24135]
Download as PDF
51578
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Connecticut, and Rhode Island at
41°18′16.249″ N. lat., 71°54′28.477″ W.
long. and proceeds southeast to
37°22′32.75″ N. lat. and the intersection
point with the outward boundary of the
EEZ. The southern boundary of the
northern zone extends from the North
Carolina and South Carolina state
border, along a line extending in a
direction of 135°34′55″ from true north
beginning at 33°51′07.9″ N. lat.,
78°32′32.6″ W. long. to the intersection
point with the outward boundary of the
EEZ.
Regulations at 50 CFR 622.388(d)(1)(i)
require NMFS to close the commercial
sector for Atlantic Spanish mackerel in
the northern zone when the commercial
quota is reached, or is projected to be
reached, by filing a notification to that
effect with the Office of the Federal
Register. NMFS has determined the
revised commercial quota of 762,670 lb
(345,941 kg) for Atlantic Spanish
mackerel in the northern zone will be
reached by November 7, 2017.
Accordingly, the commercial sector for
Atlantic Spanish mackerel in the
northern zone is closed effective at
12:01 a.m., local time, November 7,
2017, through February 28, 2018, the
end of the current fishing year.
During the commercial closure, a
person on board a vessel that has been
issued a valid Federal permit to harvest
Atlantic Spanish mackerel may
continue to retain this species in the
northern zone under the recreational
bag and possession limits specified in
50 CFR 622.382(a)(1)(iii) and (a)(2), as
long as the recreational sector for
Atlantic Spanish mackerel is open (50
CFR 622.384(e)(1)).
Also during the closure, Atlantic
Spanish mackerel from the closed zone,
including those harvested under the bag
and possession limits, may not be
purchased or sold. This prohibition
does not apply to Atlantic Spanish
mackerel from the closed zone that were
harvested, landed ashore, and sold prior
to the closure and were held in cold
storage by a dealer or processor (50 CFR
622.384(e)(2)).
Classification
The RA for the NMFS Southeast
Region has determined this temporary
rule is necessary for the conservation
and management of Atlantic Spanish
mackerel and is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws.
This action is taken under 50 CFR
622.8, 622.384(e), and 622.388(d)(1)(i)
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
These measures are exempt from the
procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
Act, because the temporary rule is
issued without opportunity for prior
notice and opportunity for comment.
This action responds to the best
scientific information available. The
Assistant Administrator for NOAA
Fisheries (AA) finds good cause to
waive the requirements to provide prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment pursuant to the authority set
forth at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such
procedures are unnecessary and
contrary to the public interest. Such
procedures are unnecessary because the
rule implementing the commercial
quota and the associated AM has
already been subject to notice and
public comment, and all that remains is
to notify the public of the closure.
Additionally, allowing prior notice and
opportunity for public comment is
contrary to the public interest because
of the need to immediately implement
this action to protect the Atlantic
Spanish mackerel stock, because the
capacity of the fishing fleet allows for
rapid harvest of the commercial quota.
Prior notice and opportunity for public
comment would require time and could
potentially result in a harvest well in
excess of the established commercial
quota.
For the aforementioned reasons, the
AA also finds good cause to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness of this
action under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 2, 2017.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–24220 Filed 11–2–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 170717675–7999–02]
RIN 0648–XF571
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Golden Tilefish Fishery; 2018
and Projected 2019–2020
Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues final
specifications for the 2018 commercial
golden tilefish fishery and projected
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
specifications for 2019 and 2020. This
action establishes allowable harvest
levels and other management measures
to prevent overfishing while allowing
optimum yield, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
the Tilefish Fishery Management Plan.
It is also intended to inform the public
of these specifications for the 2018
fishing year and projected specifications
for 2019–2020.
DATES: Effective November 2, 2017
through October 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of these
specifications, including the
Environmental Assessment, Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analyses, and other
supporting documents for the action, are
available upon request from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N.
State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The
specifications document is also
accessible via the Internet at: https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Hanson, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The golden tilefish fishery is managed
by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council under the Tilefish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP), which
outlines the Council’s process for
establishing annual specifications.
Regulations implementing the Tilefish
FMP appear at 50 CFR part 648,
subparts A and N, which require the
Council to recommend acceptable
biological catch (ABC), annual catch
limit (ACL), annual catch target (ACT),
total allowable landings (TAL), and
other management measures, for up to
three years at a time. On September 7,
2017, NMFS proposed 2018–2020
specifications for the golden tilefish
fishery (82 FR 42266) based on Council
recommendations, and accepted public
comment through September 22, 2017.
Additional background information
regarding the development of these
specifications was provided in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
Final Specifications
This action implements the approved
ABCs, catch limits, and quota limits for
the commercial golden tilefish fishery
for the 2018 fishing year (Table 1), and
projects specifications for fishing years
2019 and 2020 (Table 2), as outlined in
the proposed rule. By providing
projected quotas for 2019 and 2020,
NMFS hopes to assist fishery
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
participants in planning ahead. The
Council will review these specifications
annually, and NMFS will provide notice
prior to each fishing year to announce
any necessary changes for 2019 and
2020. These specifications are
approximately 14 percent lower than
the 2017 ABC and overall commercial
quota to ensure overfishing does not
occur. For more information on the
Council’s recommendations and
decisionmaking process, please see the
proposed rule (82 FR 42266).
As explained in the proposed rule, the
Mid-Atlantic Council developed these
specifications in parallel with
Framework Adjustment 2 to the Tilefish
FMP. Framework 2 would revise how
assumed discards are deducted in the
specifications setting process, and the
Council developed these specifications
based on that new method. However,
implementation of Framework 2 was
delayed, and a proposed rule to
implement Framework 2 is pending.
Because the revision to the specification
process has not been finalized, this
action implements the 2018 golden
tilefish specifications based on current
51579
regulations. For clarity, we also provide
details of how the 2018 specifications
would be changed under the process
proposed by Framework 2 (Table 1). If
Framework 2 is implemented as
proposed, the 2018 specifications would
be adjusted accordingly during the
fishing year. This would result in a
slight decrease in the incidental TAL
and a slight increase to the IFQ TAL and
by extension to individual IFQ
allocations. The proposed 2019 and
2020 specifications in Table 2 anticipate
the implementation of Framework 2.
TABLE 1—2018 GOLDEN TILEFISH SPECIFICATIONS AS IMPLEMENTED BY THIS ACTION, AND POTENTIAL REVISIONS UNDER
TILEFISH FRAMEWORK ADJUSTMENT 2
As implemented
million lb
Overfishing Limit ..............................................................................................
ABC ..................................................................................................................
ACL ..................................................................................................................
IFQ ACT ...........................................................................................................
Incidental ACT .................................................................................................
TAL ..................................................................................................................
IFQ TAL ...........................................................................................................
Incidental TAL ..................................................................................................
Under framework 2
mt
2.332
1.636
1.636
NA
NA
1.627
1.546
0.081
million lb
1,058
742
742
NA
NA
738
701
37
mt
2.332
1.636
1.636
1.554
0.082
NA
1.554
0.072
1,058
742
742
705
37
NA
705
33
TABLE 2—PROPOSED 2019 AND 2020 GOLDEN TILEFISH SPECIFICATIONS
2019
million lb
Overfishing Limit ..............................................................................................
ABC ..................................................................................................................
ACL ..................................................................................................................
IFQ ACT ...........................................................................................................
Incidental ACT .................................................................................................
IFQ TAL ...........................................................................................................
Incidental TAL ..................................................................................................
As in previous years, no golden
tilefish quota has been allocated for
research set-aside. All other
management measures in the golden
tilefish fishery will remain unchanged
for the 2018–2020 fishing years. The
incidental trip limit will stay 500 lb
(226.8 kg) (live weight), and the
recreational catch limit will remain
eight fish per-angler, per-trip. Annual
IFQ allocations will be issued to
individual quota shareholders in midOctober, before the November 1 start of
the fishing year.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
The public comment period for the
proposed rule ended on September 22,
2017. Five comments were received
from the public on this rule.
Comment 1: Three commenters wrote
in support of this action and the
reduction in quotas. They mentioned
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
mt
2.421
1.636
1.636
1.554
0.082
1.554
0.072
the importance of preemptive measures
to preserve fish populations and
ecosystems from overfishing while
maintaining sustainable fishing
practices.
Response 1: NMFS agrees. It is
important to use the best available
science to maintain healthy fish stocks
and sustainable fishing practices. The
Council’s risk policy was applied to the
most recent assessment outputs in the
development of these specifications
consistent with National Standard 2 and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This
resulted in a recommended reduction in
quota even though golden tilefish are
not currently overfished or experiencing
overfishing.
Comment 2: One commenter
questioned the necessity of quota
reductions when overfishing is not
occurring, and requested more
PO 00000
2020
million lb
1,098
742
742
705
37
705
33
2.291
1.636
1.636
1.554
0.082
1.554
0.072
mt
1,039
742
742
705
37
705
33
information about Tilefish Framework
Adjustment 2.
Response 2: As explained in the
proposed rule and the response to
Comment 1, catch limits and quotas are
being reduced a result of the application
of the Council’s risk policy to the best
available science to prevent overfishing
from occurring in the golden tilefish
fishery. The commenter is correct, the
golden tilefish stock is not considered
overfished or subject to overfishing; but
this action is working to maintain that
status into the future. Framework
Adjustment 2 is currently in
development through a separate
rulemaking process, and does have more
background information on the topics in
question. The proposed rule is expected
to publish in October; however, in the
interim, more information can be found
on the Council Web site at https://
www.mafmc.org/tilefish/.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
51580
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Comment 3: The commenter
recommended a more drastic cut in
quotas and claimed widespread
corruption and collusion between
NMFS and the commercial fishing
industry for unregulated profit.
Response 3: The commenter
presented no rationale or evidence
supporting the claims. The most recent
assessment determined that the golden
tilefish stock is neither overfished, nor
subject to overfishing. The Council’s
recommended quotas were set below the
overfishing limit from the stock
assessment in order to account for any
scientific uncertainty. NMFS used the
best scientific information available and
is approving specifications for the
golden tilefish fishery that are
consistent with the FMP, all applicable
legal requirements, and the
recommendations of the Council.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Changes From the Proposed Rule
As explained above, the proposed rule
anticipated the implementation of
Framework 2 before these specifications
were finalized. Because that has not
happened, the specifications must be
implemented under current regulations,
but will be adjusted when Framework 2
is finalized near the end of December
2017.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this final rule is consistent with the
Tilefish FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 because
this action contains no implementing
regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate,
conflict, or overlap with any existing
Federal rules.
This action does not contain a
collection of information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness period for
this rule, to ensure that the final
specifications are in place as close to the
start of the 2018 golden tilefish fishing
year as possible, which began on
November 1, 2017. A delay in
effectiveness past the start of the 2018
fishing year would be contrary to the
public interest, as it could create
confusion, added burden, and potential
economic harm to the commercial
golden tilefish industry. If new
specifications are not effective on that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
date, the regulations at § 648.292(a) state
the current harvest quotas would
automatically continue into the new
fishing year. Therefore, NMFS would be
required to issue initial IFQ permits
using the 2017 quota amount, and then
reissue those permits using the lower
2018 quota implemented by this rule
after the start of the fishing year.
Representatives of the commercial
golden tilefish industry have been active
participants in the Council’s
development of these specifications,
and are anticipating the 2018 quota
amount implemented by this action.
Issuing two sets of IFQ allocations based
on different quota amounts in a short
period of time would cause unnecessary
confusion and paperwork for the
commercial golden tilefish industry. If
IFQ shareholders fished or leased their
initial allocation in the interim, they
could be responsible for a quota overage
once the new 2018 quotas became
effective. Under the regulations, such an
overage would need to be paid back in
the following fishing year, which would
decrease fishing opportunities in 2019.
Because the Council did not submit
these specifications recommendations
and the accompanying environmental
assessment until early July, NMFS was
unable to prepare this action early
enough to allow for both an appropriate
public comment period and full delay in
effectiveness period. As noted above,
the commercial tilefish industry has
been a participant in the Council’s
process of developing these
specifications and is anticipating these
measures. Therefore, there is good cause
to implement these quota specifications
on November 2, 2017.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) included in this final
rule was prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
604(a), and incorporates the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA)
and a summary of analyses completed to
support the action. A public copy of the
environmental assessment/IRFA is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). The preamble to the
proposed rule included a detailed
summary of the analyses contained in
the IRFA, and that discussion is not
repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public in Response to the
IRFA, a Summary of the Agency’s
Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the
Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
The comments NMFS received did
not raise specific issues regarding the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
economic analyses summarized in the
IRFA. Refer to the ‘‘Comments and
Responses’’ section of this preamble for
more detail. No changes to the proposed
rule were required to be made as a result
of public comment.
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities To Which the Rule Would
Apply
This final rule affects small entities
engaged in commercial fishing
operations with Federal golden tilefish
permits. For the purposes of the
regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA)
analysis, the ownership entities (or
firms), not the individual vessels, are
considered to be the regulated entities.
Because of this, some vessels with
golden tilefish permits may be
considered to be part of the same firm
because they may have the same
owners. In terms of RFA, a business
primarily engaged in commercial fishing
is classified as a small business if it has
combined annual receipts not in excess
of $11 million, for all its affiliated
operations worldwide. The current
ownership data set used for this analysis
is based on calendar year 2016 (the most
recent complete year available) and
contains average gross sales associated
with those permits for calendar years
2014 through 2016. According to the
commercial ownership database, 148
affiliate firms landed golden tilefish
during the 2014–2016 period, with 145
of those business affiliates categorized
as small, and 3 as large businesses.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final
rule.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
Specification of commercial quota is
constrained by the conservation
objectives set forth in the FMP and
implemented at 50 CFR part 648 under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. The 2018–2020 catch limits and
quotas contained in this final rule are 14
percent lower than those currently in
place for 2017. However, this is the
result of the Council’s risk policy,
which requires a formulaic buffer
between the OFL and ABC that, in turn,
lowers the TAL and quotas. Therefore,
these lower catch levels in 2018 and
projected for 2019 and 2020 are
consistent with the best available
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
scientific information, the Council’s
tolerance for overfishing risk, and are
intended to prevent overfishing from
occurring.
As described in the proposed rule for
this action, two other alternatives to the
approved these specifications were
considered. The status quo
specifications (Alternative 2) were not
consistent with the Council’s risk
policy. Alternative 3 would have had a
comparable quota decrease over the
three years with the approved
specifications (Alternative 1), but
fluctuating quotas and catch limits year
to year. This was not selected because
it did not support the annual
consistency of quota/landings that the
tilefish industry considers important to
maintaining price and supply stability
in this fishery.
All affected IFQ shareholders will
receive decreases in their tilefish 2018
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:04 Nov 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
IFQ allocations in comparison to their
respective tilefish 2017 IFQ allocations.
However, the magnitude of the decrease
varies depending on the shareholder’s
relative percentage of the total IFQ
quota. Shareholders may also seek
leases to offset individual quota
decreases. NMFS does not anticipate
this decrease will create a significant
impact on the entities affected by this
action.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
51581
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as small entity
compliance guide was prepared and
will be sent to all holders of Federal
permits issued for the golden tilefish
fishery. In addition, copies of this final
rule and guide (i.e., permit holder letter)
are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and at the following Web
site: www.greateratlantic.fisheries.
noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 1, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–24135 Filed 11–2–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51578-51581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24135]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 170717675-7999-02]
RIN 0648-XF571
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Golden Tilefish
Fishery; 2018 and Projected 2019-2020 Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues final specifications for the 2018 commercial
golden tilefish fishery and projected specifications for 2019 and 2020.
This action establishes allowable harvest levels and other management
measures to prevent overfishing while allowing optimum yield,
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and the Tilefish Fishery Management Plan. It is also
intended to inform the public of these specifications for the 2018
fishing year and projected specifications for 2019-2020.
DATES: Effective November 2, 2017 through October 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of these specifications, including the Environmental
Assessment, Regulatory Flexibility Act Analyses, and other supporting
documents for the action, are available upon request from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
The specifications document is also accessible via the Internet at:
https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Hanson, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281-9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The golden tilefish fishery is managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council under the Tilefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP),
which outlines the Council's process for establishing annual
specifications. Regulations implementing the Tilefish FMP appear at 50
CFR part 648, subparts A and N, which require the Council to recommend
acceptable biological catch (ABC), annual catch limit (ACL), annual
catch target (ACT), total allowable landings (TAL), and other
management measures, for up to three years at a time. On September 7,
2017, NMFS proposed 2018-2020 specifications for the golden tilefish
fishery (82 FR 42266) based on Council recommendations, and accepted
public comment through September 22, 2017. Additional background
information regarding the development of these specifications was
provided in the proposed rule and is not repeated here.
Final Specifications
This action implements the approved ABCs, catch limits, and quota
limits for the commercial golden tilefish fishery for the 2018 fishing
year (Table 1), and projects specifications for fishing years 2019 and
2020 (Table 2), as outlined in the proposed rule. By providing
projected quotas for 2019 and 2020, NMFS hopes to assist fishery
[[Page 51579]]
participants in planning ahead. The Council will review these
specifications annually, and NMFS will provide notice prior to each
fishing year to announce any necessary changes for 2019 and 2020. These
specifications are approximately 14 percent lower than the 2017 ABC and
overall commercial quota to ensure overfishing does not occur. For more
information on the Council's recommendations and decisionmaking
process, please see the proposed rule (82 FR 42266).
As explained in the proposed rule, the Mid-Atlantic Council
developed these specifications in parallel with Framework Adjustment 2
to the Tilefish FMP. Framework 2 would revise how assumed discards are
deducted in the specifications setting process, and the Council
developed these specifications based on that new method. However,
implementation of Framework 2 was delayed, and a proposed rule to
implement Framework 2 is pending. Because the revision to the
specification process has not been finalized, this action implements
the 2018 golden tilefish specifications based on current regulations.
For clarity, we also provide details of how the 2018 specifications
would be changed under the process proposed by Framework 2 (Table 1).
If Framework 2 is implemented as proposed, the 2018 specifications
would be adjusted accordingly during the fishing year. This would
result in a slight decrease in the incidental TAL and a slight increase
to the IFQ TAL and by extension to individual IFQ allocations. The
proposed 2019 and 2020 specifications in Table 2 anticipate the
implementation of Framework 2.
Table 1--2018 Golden Tilefish Specifications as Implemented by This Action, and Potential Revisions Under
Tilefish Framework Adjustment 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As implemented Under framework 2
---------------------------------------------------------------
million lb mt million lb mt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overfishing Limit............................... 2.332 1,058 2.332 1,058
ABC............................................. 1.636 742 1.636 742
ACL............................................. 1.636 742 1.636 742
IFQ ACT......................................... NA NA 1.554 705
Incidental ACT.................................. NA NA 0.082 37
TAL............................................. 1.627 738 NA NA
IFQ TAL......................................... 1.546 701 1.554 705
Incidental TAL.................................. 0.081 37 0.072 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Proposed 2019 and 2020 Golden Tilefish Specifications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 2020
---------------------------------------------------------------
million lb mt million lb mt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overfishing Limit............................... 2.421 1,098 2.291 1,039
ABC............................................. 1.636 742 1.636 742
ACL............................................. 1.636 742 1.636 742
IFQ ACT......................................... 1.554 705 1.554 705
Incidental ACT.................................. 0.082 37 0.082 37
IFQ TAL......................................... 1.554 705 1.554 705
Incidental TAL.................................. 0.072 33 0.072 33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As in previous years, no golden tilefish quota has been allocated
for research set-aside. All other management measures in the golden
tilefish fishery will remain unchanged for the 2018-2020 fishing years.
The incidental trip limit will stay 500 lb (226.8 kg) (live weight),
and the recreational catch limit will remain eight fish per-angler,
per-trip. Annual IFQ allocations will be issued to individual quota
shareholders in mid-October, before the November 1 start of the fishing
year.
Comments and Responses
The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on September
22, 2017. Five comments were received from the public on this rule.
Comment 1: Three commenters wrote in support of this action and the
reduction in quotas. They mentioned the importance of preemptive
measures to preserve fish populations and ecosystems from overfishing
while maintaining sustainable fishing practices.
Response 1: NMFS agrees. It is important to use the best available
science to maintain healthy fish stocks and sustainable fishing
practices. The Council's risk policy was applied to the most recent
assessment outputs in the development of these specifications
consistent with National Standard 2 and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This
resulted in a recommended reduction in quota even though golden
tilefish are not currently overfished or experiencing overfishing.
Comment 2: One commenter questioned the necessity of quota
reductions when overfishing is not occurring, and requested more
information about Tilefish Framework Adjustment 2.
Response 2: As explained in the proposed rule and the response to
Comment 1, catch limits and quotas are being reduced a result of the
application of the Council's risk policy to the best available science
to prevent overfishing from occurring in the golden tilefish fishery.
The commenter is correct, the golden tilefish stock is not considered
overfished or subject to overfishing; but this action is working to
maintain that status into the future. Framework Adjustment 2 is
currently in development through a separate rulemaking process, and
does have more background information on the topics in question. The
proposed rule is expected to publish in October; however, in the
interim, more information can be found on the Council Web site at
https://www.mafmc.org/tilefish/.
[[Page 51580]]
Comment 3: The commenter recommended a more drastic cut in quotas
and claimed widespread corruption and collusion between NMFS and the
commercial fishing industry for unregulated profit.
Response 3: The commenter presented no rationale or evidence
supporting the claims. The most recent assessment determined that the
golden tilefish stock is neither overfished, nor subject to
overfishing. The Council's recommended quotas were set below the
overfishing limit from the stock assessment in order to account for any
scientific uncertainty. NMFS used the best scientific information
available and is approving specifications for the golden tilefish
fishery that are consistent with the FMP, all applicable legal
requirements, and the recommendations of the Council.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
As explained above, the proposed rule anticipated the
implementation of Framework 2 before these specifications were
finalized. Because that has not happened, the specifications must be
implemented under current regulations, but will be adjusted when
Framework 2 is finalized near the end of December 2017.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final rule is
consistent with the Tilefish FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866
because this action contains no implementing regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate, conflict, or overlap with any
existing Federal rules.
This action does not contain a collection of information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
period for this rule, to ensure that the final specifications are in
place as close to the start of the 2018 golden tilefish fishing year as
possible, which began on November 1, 2017. A delay in effectiveness
past the start of the 2018 fishing year would be contrary to the public
interest, as it could create confusion, added burden, and potential
economic harm to the commercial golden tilefish industry. If new
specifications are not effective on that date, the regulations at Sec.
648.292(a) state the current harvest quotas would automatically
continue into the new fishing year. Therefore, NMFS would be required
to issue initial IFQ permits using the 2017 quota amount, and then
reissue those permits using the lower 2018 quota implemented by this
rule after the start of the fishing year. Representatives of the
commercial golden tilefish industry have been active participants in
the Council's development of these specifications, and are anticipating
the 2018 quota amount implemented by this action. Issuing two sets of
IFQ allocations based on different quota amounts in a short period of
time would cause unnecessary confusion and paperwork for the commercial
golden tilefish industry. If IFQ shareholders fished or leased their
initial allocation in the interim, they could be responsible for a
quota overage once the new 2018 quotas became effective. Under the
regulations, such an overage would need to be paid back in the
following fishing year, which would decrease fishing opportunities in
2019.
Because the Council did not submit these specifications
recommendations and the accompanying environmental assessment until
early July, NMFS was unable to prepare this action early enough to
allow for both an appropriate public comment period and full delay in
effectiveness period. As noted above, the commercial tilefish industry
has been a participant in the Council's process of developing these
specifications and is anticipating these measures. Therefore, there is
good cause to implement these quota specifications on November 2, 2017.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) included in this
final rule was prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a), and incorporates
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a summary of
analyses completed to support the action. A public copy of the
environmental assessment/IRFA is available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). The preamble to the proposed rule included a detailed
summary of the analyses contained in the IRFA, and that discussion is
not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
The comments NMFS received did not raise specific issues regarding
the economic analyses summarized in the IRFA. Refer to the ``Comments
and Responses'' section of this preamble for more detail. No changes to
the proposed rule were required to be made as a result of public
comment.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
This final rule affects small entities engaged in commercial
fishing operations with Federal golden tilefish permits. For the
purposes of the regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA) analysis, the
ownership entities (or firms), not the individual vessels, are
considered to be the regulated entities. Because of this, some vessels
with golden tilefish permits may be considered to be part of the same
firm because they may have the same owners. In terms of RFA, a business
primarily engaged in commercial fishing is classified as a small
business if it has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11
million, for all its affiliated operations worldwide. The current
ownership data set used for this analysis is based on calendar year
2016 (the most recent complete year available) and contains average
gross sales associated with those permits for calendar years 2014
through 2016. According to the commercial ownership database, 148
affiliate firms landed golden tilefish during the 2014-2016 period,
with 145 of those business affiliates categorized as small, and 3 as
large businesses.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final rule.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes
Specification of commercial quota is constrained by the
conservation objectives set forth in the FMP and implemented at 50 CFR
part 648 under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The 2018-2020
catch limits and quotas contained in this final rule are 14 percent
lower than those currently in place for 2017. However, this is the
result of the Council's risk policy, which requires a formulaic buffer
between the OFL and ABC that, in turn, lowers the TAL and quotas.
Therefore, these lower catch levels in 2018 and projected for 2019 and
2020 are consistent with the best available
[[Page 51581]]
scientific information, the Council's tolerance for overfishing risk,
and are intended to prevent overfishing from occurring.
As described in the proposed rule for this action, two other
alternatives to the approved these specifications were considered. The
status quo specifications (Alternative 2) were not consistent with the
Council's risk policy. Alternative 3 would have had a comparable quota
decrease over the three years with the approved specifications
(Alternative 1), but fluctuating quotas and catch limits year to year.
This was not selected because it did not support the annual consistency
of quota/landings that the tilefish industry considers important to
maintaining price and supply stability in this fishery.
All affected IFQ shareholders will receive decreases in their
tilefish 2018 IFQ allocations in comparison to their respective
tilefish 2017 IFQ allocations. However, the magnitude of the decrease
varies depending on the shareholder's relative percentage of the total
IFQ quota. Shareholders may also seek leases to offset individual quota
decreases. NMFS does not anticipate this decrease will create a
significant impact on the entities affected by this action.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as
small entity compliance guide was prepared and will be sent to all
holders of Federal permits issued for the golden tilefish fishery. In
addition, copies of this final rule and guide (i.e., permit holder
letter) are available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and at the following
Web site: www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 1, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24135 Filed 11-2-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P