Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements for Municipal Waste Combustors, 51350-51351 [2017-24116]
Download as PDF
51350
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Regional haze, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 24, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Accordingly, the amendments to 40
CFR 52.1520 published in the Federal
Register on September 6, 2017 (82 FR
42037), on page 42040 are withdrawn
effective November 6, 2017.
■
[FR Doc. 2017–24113 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0484; FRL–9970–28–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Continuous Opacity
Monitoring Requirements for Municipal
Waste Combustors
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
of Maryland’s Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 111(d)/129 State Plan for
municipal waste combustors (MWCs).
The revisions contain Maryland’s
amendments to Regulations .07 and .08
under the Code of Maryland Regulations
(COMAR) 26.11.08. These amendments
update the MWC references to opacity
compliance. The Maryland Department
of the Environment (MDE)’s
discontinued Technical Memorandum
(TM 90–01) is no longer applicable and
the regulations now refer to COMAR
26.11.31, which codifies quality
assurance (QA) and quality control (QC)
procedures for continuous opacity
monitors (COMs). EPA is approving this
revision to remove TM 90–01 from
Maryland’s CAA section 111(d)/129
State Plan in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
5, 2018 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by December 6, 2017. If EPA receives
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2017–0484 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
aquino.marcos@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Linn, (215) 814–5273, or by email
at linn.emily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 10, 2016, the State of
Maryland submitted a formal revision
(MD Submittal #16–05) to its CAA
section 111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs.
The revisions contain Maryland’s
amendments to COMAR 26.11.08.08,
‘‘Requirements for an Existing Large
MWC with a Capacity Greater Than 250
Tons Per Day.’’ These amendments
update the MWC references to opacity
compliance previously made by MDE.
MDE’s discontinued technical
memorandum which previously
addressed QA/QC procedures for COMs,
TM 90–01, is no longer state effective
and the Maryland regulations therefore
now refer to COMAR 26.11.31, which
codifies similar QA and QC procedures
for COMs.1 In a state rulemaking action,
1 EPA previously approved Maryland’s State Plan
for large MWCs on April 8, 2008 (see 73 FR 18970).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
MDE also revised the title of COMAR
26.11.08.07, ‘‘Requirements for
Municipal Waste Combustors with a
Capacity of 35 tons or greater per day
and less than or equal to 250 Tons Per
Day,’’ to clarify that the state regulation
applies to small MWCs. However, this
clarification to the title of COMAR
26.11.08.07 is a minor administrative
change and is not part of this action.
The text of 26.11.08.07 remains
unchanged, and thus the requirements
for MWCs remain unchanged. EPA is
approving this revision to remove TM
90–01 from Maryland’s 111(d)/129 State
Plan for MWCs in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA as the changes
are administrative in nature.
II. Summary of CAA Section 111(d)/129
State Plan Revision and EPA Analysis
EPA has reviewed Maryland’s
submittal to revise its CAA section
111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs in the
context of the requirements of 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Eb. These amendments
are largely administrative in nature. In
this action, EPA is finalizing its
determination that the submitted
revision meets the above-cited
requirements. EPA is revising 40 CFR
part 62, subpart V (§ 62.5110 and
§ 61.5112) to reflect this approval.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the May 10, 2016
Maryland CAA section 111(d)/129 State
Plan revision submittal as a revision to
Maryland’s CAA section 111(d)/129
State Plan for MWCs. EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because
EPA views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of this Federal Register,
EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to
approve the 111(d)/129 State Plan
revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective on January 5,
2018 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comment by December
6, 2017. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time.
In addition, EPA previously approved, as a revision
to the Maryland state implementation plan, the
regulatory requirements for QA/QC controls for
COMs in COMAR 26.11.31. 81 FR 78048 (November
7, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a
state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing Section 111(d)/129 plan
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this
context, in the absence of a prior
existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
Section 111(d)/129 plan submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
EPA, when it reviews a Section 111(d)/
129 plan submission, to use VCS in
place of a Section 111(d)/129 plan
submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus,
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
51351
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 18, 2017.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 62 is amended as
follows:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. Section 62.5110 is amended by
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 62.5110
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) On May 10, 2016, Maryland
submitted a revised State Plan and
related COMAR 26.11.08.08
amendments.
■ 3. Section 62.5112 is amended by
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
§ 62.5112
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 5, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register, rather than file
an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking action. This action
approving Maryland’s revisions to their
111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
*
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Effective date.
*
*
*
*
(c) The plan revision is effective
January 5, 2018.
[FR Doc. 2017–24116 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0362; FRL–9969–99]
Formaldehyde, Polymer With 1,3Benzenediol, 2-Methyloxirane and
Oxirane, Ethers With Polyethylene
Glycol Mono-Me Ether; Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of formaldehyde,
polymer with 1,3-benzenediol, 2methyloxirane and oxirane, ethers with
polyethylene glycol mono-Me ether
(CAS Reg. No. 1998118–31–2) when
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51350-51351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24116]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0484; FRL-9970-28-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements for Municipal
Waste Combustors
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the State of Maryland's Clean Air
Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 State Plan for municipal waste combustors
(MWCs). The revisions contain Maryland's amendments to Regulations .07
and .08 under the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.11.08. These
amendments update the MWC references to opacity compliance. The
Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)'s discontinued Technical
Memorandum (TM 90-01) is no longer applicable and the regulations now
refer to COMAR 26.11.31, which codifies quality assurance (QA) and
quality control (QC) procedures for continuous opacity monitors (COMs).
EPA is approving this revision to remove TM 90-01 from Maryland's CAA
section 111(d)/129 State Plan in accordance with the requirements of
the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 5, 2018 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by December 6,
2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2017-0484 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
aquino.marcos@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Linn, (215) 814-5273, or by
email at linn.emily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 10, 2016, the State of Maryland submitted a formal revision
(MD Submittal #16-05) to its CAA section 111(d)/129 State Plan for
MWCs. The revisions contain Maryland's amendments to COMAR 26.11.08.08,
``Requirements for an Existing Large MWC with a Capacity Greater Than
250 Tons Per Day.'' These amendments update the MWC references to
opacity compliance previously made by MDE. MDE's discontinued technical
memorandum which previously addressed QA/QC procedures for COMs, TM 90-
01, is no longer state effective and the Maryland regulations therefore
now refer to COMAR 26.11.31, which codifies similar QA and QC
procedures for COMs.\1\ In a state rulemaking action, MDE also revised
the title of COMAR 26.11.08.07, ``Requirements for Municipal Waste
Combustors with a Capacity of 35 tons or greater per day and less than
or equal to 250 Tons Per Day,'' to clarify that the state regulation
applies to small MWCs. However, this clarification to the title of
COMAR 26.11.08.07 is a minor administrative change and is not part of
this action. The text of 26.11.08.07 remains unchanged, and thus the
requirements for MWCs remain unchanged. EPA is approving this revision
to remove TM 90-01 from Maryland's 111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs in
accordance with the requirements of the CAA as the changes are
administrative in nature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA previously approved Maryland's State Plan for large MWCs
on April 8, 2008 (see 73 FR 18970). In addition, EPA previously
approved, as a revision to the Maryland state implementation plan,
the regulatory requirements for QA/QC controls for COMs in COMAR
26.11.31. 81 FR 78048 (November 7, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of CAA Section 111(d)/129 State Plan Revision and EPA
Analysis
EPA has reviewed Maryland's submittal to revise its CAA section
111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs in the context of the requirements of 40
CFR part 60, subpart Eb. These amendments are largely administrative in
nature. In this action, EPA is finalizing its determination that the
submitted revision meets the above-cited requirements. EPA is revising
40 CFR part 62, subpart V (Sec. 62.5110 and Sec. 61.5112) to reflect
this approval.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the May 10, 2016 Maryland CAA section 111(d)/129
State Plan revision submittal as a revision to Maryland's CAA section
111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs. EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment
and anticipates no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of this Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the 111(d)/129 State Plan
revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective on
January 5, 2018 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse
comment by December 6, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.
[[Page 51351]]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). This
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal requirement, and
does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing Section 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission
for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable
law for EPA, when it reviews a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission, to
use VCS in place of a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 5, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action. This action approving Maryland's revisions to their
111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 18, 2017.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR part 62 is amended
as follows:
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. Section 62.5110 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 62.5110 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) On May 10, 2016, Maryland submitted a revised State Plan and
related COMAR 26.11.08.08 amendments.
0
3. Section 62.5112 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 62.5112 Effective date.
* * * * *
(c) The plan revision is effective January 5, 2018.
[FR Doc. 2017-24116 Filed 11-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P