Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above the Division Level; Guidance for Industry and Review Staff; Availability, 51419-51420 [2017-24096]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices
‘‘outcomes’’ and ‘‘outputs’’ if I don’t know
what they mean to you? Or are they the same
meaning to you and it’s just a change in the
words that are going to be used?
Response: ANA’s intent is to provide
more universally accepted terminology,
especially for evaluation requirements
and criteria. Definitions and examples
of all new terms will be provided in
each of the FY 2018 FOAs. Any new
terminology will be addressed in
Section I. Program Description of the
FOA. ANA will explain each term and
include examples of each. Definitions
will be included in the appendix of each
FOA.
B. ANA Administrative Policy
Regarding Prioritized Funding for
Local, Community-Based, Native
American Organizations as Described
in the August 14, 2017, NOPC (82 FR
37861)
ANA has edited the description of
this policy since it was published in the
Federal Register, to further clarify the
requirements for non-local, national,
and regional organizations. If approved,
ANA intends to include this policy in
all FY 2018 FOAs as stated below:
Prioritized Funding for Communitybased Native American Organizations:
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
ANA reserves the right to prioritize
funding to community-based Native
American organizations serving their local
communities and populations. Applications
from non-local, national, and regional
organizations that propose projects to serve
multiple communities, or to be performed in
a different geographic location, must clearly
demonstrate that the need for the project was
originated by the each community being
served, and that the community and/or tribal
government supports the proposed project.
They must also describe how each
community was selected, identify and
describe the intended beneficiaries,
demonstrate community involvement in the
development of the project, and discuss a
community-based delivery strategy for the
project. The proposed project goals,
objectives, and outcomes must address goals
of the community being served. National and
regional organizations must describe their
membership, and define how the
organization operates. The type of
community to be served will determine the
type of documentation necessary to support
the project.
C. Additional Information Regarding
Project Start Dates for Language
Preservation and Maintenance, and
Native Language Esther Martinez
Immersion Grants
Through continued discussions with
ANA grantees and stakeholders, ANA
has determined that moving the start
date from August 1 to July 1 for projects
funded under the Native Language
Preservation and Maintenance and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
Native Language Esther Martinez
Immersion programs will align reporting
requirements to reduce the number of
required federal financial reports,
thereby reducing the reporting burden
for grantees. In addition, an earlier start
date will provide projects with
additional time for planning and start
up prior to the start of the school year,
which marks the beginning of
instruction for many Native Language
projects. Therefore, ANA intends to
implement a July 1 start date for all
projects funded under the Native
Language Preservation and Maintenance
and Native Language Esther Martinez
Immersion FOAs for FY 2018.
D. Application Period Notification
ANA would like to notify potential
applicants that the open application
period to respond to FOAs has been
updated to a minimum of 60 days to
support the timely award of new grants.
E. Funding Opportunity
Announcements
For information on the types of
projects funded by ANA, please refer to
ANA’s Web site for information on our
program areas and FOAs: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ana. Prepublication information on ANA’s FOAs
will be available at https://
www.grants.gov/web/grants/searchgrants.html by clicking on ‘Forecasted’’
under Opportunity Status and
‘‘Administration for Children and
Families—ANA [HHS–ACF–ANA]’’ on
the left side of the page. Synopses and
application forms will be available on
www.Grants.gov.
Stacey Ecoffey,
Acting Commissioner, Administration for
Native American, ACF, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Native American
Affairs, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–24124 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–0221]
Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor
Appeals Above the Division Level;
Guidance for Industry and Review
Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
announcing the availability of a
guidance for industry and review staff
entitled ‘‘Formal Dispute Resolution:
Sponsor Appeals Above the Division
Level.’’ This guidance provides
recommendations for industry and
review staff on the procedures in the
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER) and the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) for
resolving scientific and/or medical
disputes between CDER or CBER and
sponsors that cannot be resolved at the
division level. This guidance describes
the formal dispute resolution
procedures for sponsors that wish to
appeal a scientific and/or medical issue
to the office or center level and provides
a structured process for resolving
disputes. This guidance finalizes the
revised draft guidance entitled ‘‘Formal
Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the
Division Level’’ issued September 9,
2015, and replaces the guidance of the
same name issued February 2000.
DATES: The announcement of the
guidance is published in the Federal
Register on November 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either
electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
SUMMARY:
51419
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
51420
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2013–D–0221 for ‘‘Formal Dispute
Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above the
Division Level; Guidance for Industry
and Review Staff; Availability.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Nov 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CDR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single
copies of this guidance to the Division
of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, or the Office of Communication,
Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label
to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Khushboo Sharma, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6486,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–0700; or, Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
240–402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry and review staff
entitled ‘‘Formal Dispute Resolution:
Sponsor Appeals Above the Division
Level.’’ During the course of review of
an investigational new drug application,
new drug application, biologics license
application, or abbreviated new drug
application, a wide variety of important
scientific and/or medical issues are
considered that are central to product
development. Sometimes, a sponsor
may disagree with the Agency on a
matter, and a dispute arises. Because
these disputes often involve complex
scientific and/or medical matters, it is
critical to have procedures in place to
help ensure open and prompt
discussion. The procedures and policies
described in this guidance are intended
to promote rapid and fair resolution of
scientific and/or medical disputes
between a sponsor and CDER or CBER.
This guidance finalizes the revised
draft guidance entitled ‘‘Formal Dispute
Resolution: Appeals Above the Division
Level’’ issued September 9, 2015, and
replaces the guidance of the same name
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
issued February 2000. Based on the
docket comments for the revised draft
guidance, FDA made clarifications to
this guidance. The guidance was also
clarified to reflect that it describes the
formal dispute resolution procedures
only for sponsors that wish to appeal a
scientific and/or medical issue
regarding their applications regulated by
CDER or CBER and does not apply to
other individuals or entities. In
addition, the guidance was updated to
reflect the changes under the 2017
reauthorization of the Generic Drug User
Fee Amendments of 2012 (GDUFA)
regarding timelines for reviewing
disputes involving drug applications
covered by GDUFA.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on formal dispute
resolution requests for appeals above
the division level. It does not establish
any rights for any person and is not
binding on FDA or the public. You can
use an alternative approach if it satisfies
the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations. This guidance
is not subject to Executive Order 12866.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in this guidance have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0430. This guidance
finalizes a revision of an earlier version
of the guidance. This version contains
no additional information collections;
therefore, it continues to be covered
under OMB control number 0910–0430.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain the guidance at https://
www.fda.gov/drugs/
guidancecompliance
regulatoryinformation/guidances/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/
biologicsbloodvaccines/
guidancecompliance
regulatoryinformation/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 31, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning,
Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017–24096 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51419-51420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24096]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0221]
Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above the Division
Level; Guidance for Industry and Review Staff; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a guidance for industry and review staff entitled
``Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above the Division
Level.'' This guidance provides recommendations for industry and review
staff on the procedures in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) for
resolving scientific and/or medical disputes between CDER or CBER and
sponsors that cannot be resolved at the division level. This guidance
describes the formal dispute resolution procedures for sponsors that
wish to appeal a scientific and/or medical issue to the office or
center level and provides a structured process for resolving disputes.
This guidance finalizes the revised draft guidance entitled ``Formal
Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level'' issued September
9, 2015, and replaces the guidance of the same name issued February
2000.
DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on November 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
[[Page 51420]]
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2013-D-0221 for ``Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above
the Division Level; Guidance for Industry and Review Staff;
Availability.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CDR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Khushboo Sharma, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6486, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-0700; or, Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry and
review staff entitled ``Formal Dispute Resolution: Sponsor Appeals
Above the Division Level.'' During the course of review of an
investigational new drug application, new drug application, biologics
license application, or abbreviated new drug application, a wide
variety of important scientific and/or medical issues are considered
that are central to product development. Sometimes, a sponsor may
disagree with the Agency on a matter, and a dispute arises. Because
these disputes often involve complex scientific and/or medical matters,
it is critical to have procedures in place to help ensure open and
prompt discussion. The procedures and policies described in this
guidance are intended to promote rapid and fair resolution of
scientific and/or medical disputes between a sponsor and CDER or CBER.
This guidance finalizes the revised draft guidance entitled
``Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level'' issued
September 9, 2015, and replaces the guidance of the same name issued
February 2000. Based on the docket comments for the revised draft
guidance, FDA made clarifications to this guidance. The guidance was
also clarified to reflect that it describes the formal dispute
resolution procedures only for sponsors that wish to appeal a
scientific and/or medical issue regarding their applications regulated
by CDER or CBER and does not apply to other individuals or entities. In
addition, the guidance was updated to reflect the changes under the
2017 reauthorization of the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012
(GDUFA) regarding timelines for reviewing disputes involving drug
applications covered by GDUFA.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on formal dispute resolution requests for
appeals above the division level. It does not establish any rights for
any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive
Order 12866.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information in this guidance have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0430. This guidance finalizes a
revision of an earlier version of the guidance. This version contains
no additional information collections; therefore, it continues to be
covered under OMB control number 0910-0430.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/default.htm, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 31, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-24096 Filed 11-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P