Airworthiness Directives; Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Turboshaft Engines, 51170-51172 [2017-23606]
Download as PDF
51170
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 212
Friday, November 3, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR 890
RIN: 3206–AN33
Federal Employees Health Benefits
(FEHB) Program: FEHB Employee
Premium Contributions for Employees
in Leave Without Pay or Other Nonpay
Status
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The United States Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) is
withdrawing a previously published
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
that would have amended the Federal
Employees Health Benefits (FEHB)
regulations at 5 CFR part 890 to provide
flexibility to agencies regarding
payment for FEHB coverage for
employees entering leave without pay
(LWOP) or any other type of nonpay
status, except when nonpay is as a
result of a lapse of appropriations. The
regulation also would have affected
employees who have insufficient pay to
cover their premium contribution, and
certain categories of employees were
exempt.
DATES: OPM is withdrawing the
proposed rule published August 30,
2016 (81 FR 59518) as of November 3,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Elam, Program Analyst at (202) 606–
0004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
30, 2016, OPM published an NPRM (81
FR 59518) that would complement the
FEHB Modification of Eligibility final
regulation (79 FR 62325, published on
October 17, 2014) which allows
generally for certain temporary,
intermittent and seasonal employees to
enroll in the FEHB Program if they are
expected to work at least 130 hours per
month for at least 90 days. In the NPRM,
OPM recognized that the expansion of
eligibility for FEHB coverage may
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 02, 2017
Jkt 244001
impact an agency’s budget due to the
required FEHB Government health
benefit contributions for newly eligible
employees who elect to participate in
FEHB coverage and go into LWOP or
other nonpay status based on the
intermittent nature of the work
performed. The NPRM would have
provided flexibility to agencies
regarding payment for FEHB coverage
for employees entering leave without
pay (LWOP) or any other type of nonpay
status, except when nonpay is as a
result of a lapse of appropriations.
OPM received comments from Federal
employees, Federal agencies, a Federal
shared service provider, and unions
representing Federal employees. The
majority of commenters objected to the
regulation based on concerns that the
rule would place an undue financial
burden on Federal employees on LWOP
or other nonpay status and would make
it difficult for these employees to
maintain health insurance. OPM also
received comments about the impact of
the rule on Permanent Seasonal
Employees (PSEs). The commenters
stated that PSEs are placed in nonpay
status annually and there is a reasonable
expectation that these employees will
return to employment and repay the
unpaid premiums that have been
incurred as a debt.
In reviewing these objections, OPM
attempted to determine whether the
potential cost savings from this
proposed rulemaking outweighs the
negative impact asserted by
commenters. To estimate cost savings,
OPM requested the current amount of
unrecoverable premium debt from
employees on LWOP and nonpay status
from several agencies with large
numbers of temporary, seasonal and
intermittent employees. However, these
agencies were generally unable to
provide this data. Agencies do not have
reliable data on unrecoverable FEHB
debt because, due to constantly
changing circumstances, these amounts
are difficult to track. OPM did obtain
one estimate of unpaid FEHB debt or
FEHB debt in default for all employees
on seasonal and intermittent Schedules
in LWOP or insufficient pay for one
agency for FY2016. The agency reported
that total FEHB debt incurred by the
agency for these employees was
$1,068,065, but that only $48,797 of this
total debt remained unpaid by
employees once they returned to pay (or
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sufficient pay) status. Further, there are
debt collection mechanisms in place to
recover the remaining $48,797.
Agencies must already comply with
the Debt Collection Improvement Act
(DCIA) of 1996 (DCIA) to collect
delinquent debt, including FEHB debt.
Therefore, appropriate actions are being
taken for the collection of FEHB debt for
employees entering leave without pay
(LWOP) or any other type of nonpay
status. OPM determined that the
potential cost savings from this
proposed rulemaking does not outweigh
the potential negative impact of the
undue financial burden or risk of losing
health insurance on certain Federal
employees.
Withdrawal of this NPRM (81 FR
59518, August 30, 2016) does not
preclude the agency from issuing future
rulemakings on this issue, nor does it
commit the agency to any course of
action in the future.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Kathleen McGettigan,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2017–23956 Filed 11–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–63–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0838; Product
Identifier 2017–NE–33–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Safran
Helicopter Engines, S.A., Turboshaft
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Arriel
2E turboshaft engines. This proposed
AD was prompted by reports of
ruptured front support pins on the
accessory gearbox front support. This
proposed AD would require
replacement of the accessory gearbox
front support. We are proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
51171
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
We must receive comments on
this NPRM by December 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Safran
Helicopter Engines, S.A., 40220 Tarnos,
France; phone: (33) 05 59 74 40 00; fax:
(33) 05 59 74 45 15. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Engine
and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0838; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
238–7754; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
robert.green@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2017–0838; Product Identifier 2017–
NE–33–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM
because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.
2016–0235, dated November 24, 2016
(referred to hereinafter as ‘‘the MCAI’’),
to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Some cases were reported of ruptured front
support pins on ARRIEL 1E2 engines. That
condition, if not detected and corrected,
could lead to the loss of the load path
integrity of the engine front support.
´
Consequently, Turbomeca issued Mandatory
Service Bulletin (MSB) 292 72 0842 to
provide instructions for the inspection of the
pins and front support replacement, and
EASA issued AD 2015–0064 (later revised) to
require those actions. Since EASA AD 2015–
0064R1 was issued, SAFRAN Helicopter
Engines developed a new pin design, in order
to increase the mechanical strength of the
pin, through modification TU380, for
ARRIEL 1E2 engines. Although no cases of
front support pin rupture have been reported
on ARRIEL 2E engines, since the ARRIEL 1E2
and 2E type designs have the same front
support, SAFRAN Helicopter Engines
decided to also apply this new pin design on
ARRIEL 2E engines through modification
TU197. To address this potential unsafe
condition, SAFRAN Helicopter Engines
decided, as precautionary measure, to replace
the front support on ARRIEL 2E engines, and
published MSB 292 72 2197 to provide
instructions for in-service front support
replacement. For the reasons described
above, this AD requires modification of the
affected engines by replacement of each premod TU197 front support.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0838.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Safran Helicopter
Engines, S.A., Mandatory Service
Bulletin (MSB) No. 292 72 2197,
Version A, dated September 15, 2016.
The MSB describes procedures for
replacement of the accessory gearbox
front support. This service information
is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of France, and is
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with the European
Community, EASA has notified us of
the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the
same type design. This proposed AD
would require for replacement of the
accessory gearbox front support.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 28 engines installed on aircraft of
U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Action
Labor cost
Front support replacement ..............................
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .............
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 02, 2017
Jkt 244001
Parts cost
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$19,731
Cost per
product
$19,901
Cost on U.S.
operators
$557,228
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
51172
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch,
Policy and Innovation Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Type
Certificate previously held by
Turbomeca, S.A): Docket No. FAA–
2017–0838; Product Identifier 2017–NE–
33–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December
18, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Safran Helicopter
Engines S.A. Arriel 2E turboshaft engines
with front support, part number 0 292 11 715
0, installed (pre-mod TU 197 configuration).
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 8300, Accessory Gearboxes.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
ruptured front support pins on the accessory
gearbox front support. We are issuing this AD
to prevent failure of a front support, loss of
engine thrust control and reduced control of
the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Before the accessory gearbox and
transmission shaft module (Module 01)
accumulates 1,600 engine operating hours
since new, or within 80 engine operating
hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, replace the front
support with a part eligible for installation.
(h) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, a part eligible
for installation is a Module 01 with a premod TU 197 front support, that has not
accumulated more than 1,680 engine
operating hours since new; or a Module 01
with a post-mod TU 197 front support.
(i) Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, you may
not install a pre-mod TU 197 front support
on any engine with a post-mod TU 197 front
support installed.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, FAA, ECO Branch, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ECO Branch, send it to
the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You may email
your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 02, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–238–
7754; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
robert.green@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2016–0235,
dated November 24, 2016, for more
information. You may examine the MCAI in
the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA–2017–0838.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
October 24, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–23606 Filed 11–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0906; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–039–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005–12–
16, for all Fokker Services B.V. Model
F28 Mark 0100 airplanes. AD 2005–12–
16 requires an inspection to determine
the part number of the passenger service
unit (PSU) panels for the PSU
modification status, and corrective
actions if applicable. Since we issued
AD 2005–12–16, we have determined
that the required modification actions
might not have been implemented
correctly. This proposed AD would
require an inspection of the PSU panels
and the PSU panel/airplane interface
connectors for discrepancies, and
corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD would also remove
airplanes from the applicability. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 18,
2017.
SUMMARY:
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51170-51172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23606]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0838; Product Identifier 2017-NE-33-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A.,
Turboshaft Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Arriel 2E turboshaft engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports of ruptured front support pins on
the accessory gearbox front support. This proposed AD would require
replacement of the accessory gearbox front support. We are proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
[[Page 51171]]
DATES: We must receive comments on this NPRM by December 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: (33) 05
59 74 40 00; fax: (33) 05 59 74 45 15. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0838; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, ECO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-
238-7754; fax: 781-238-7199; email: robert.green@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0838;
Product Identifier 2017-NE-33-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No. 2016-0235, dated November 24, 2016 (referred to hereinafter as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Some cases were reported of ruptured front support pins on
ARRIEL 1E2 engines. That condition, if not detected and corrected,
could lead to the loss of the load path integrity of the engine
front support. Consequently, Turbom[eacute]ca issued Mandatory
Service Bulletin (MSB) 292 72 0842 to provide instructions for the
inspection of the pins and front support replacement, and EASA
issued AD 2015-0064 (later revised) to require those actions. Since
EASA AD 2015-0064R1 was issued, SAFRAN Helicopter Engines developed
a new pin design, in order to increase the mechanical strength of
the pin, through modification TU380, for ARRIEL 1E2 engines.
Although no cases of front support pin rupture have been reported on
ARRIEL 2E engines, since the ARRIEL 1E2 and 2E type designs have the
same front support, SAFRAN Helicopter Engines decided to also apply
this new pin design on ARRIEL 2E engines through modification TU197.
To address this potential unsafe condition, SAFRAN Helicopter
Engines decided, as precautionary measure, to replace the front
support on ARRIEL 2E engines, and published MSB 292 72 2197 to
provide instructions for in-service front support replacement. For
the reasons described above, this AD requires modification of the
affected engines by replacement of each pre-mod TU197 front support.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0838.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Mandatory Service
Bulletin (MSB) No. 292 72 2197, Version A, dated September 15, 2016.
The MSB describes procedures for replacement of the accessory gearbox
front support. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of France,
and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the European Community, EASA has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design. This proposed AD would require for
replacement of the accessory gearbox front support.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 28 engines installed on
aircraft of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Front support replacement............. 2 work-hours x $85 per $19,731 $19,901 $557,228
hour = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for
[[Page 51172]]
safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A. (Type Certificate previously held by
Turbomeca, S.A): Docket No. FAA-2017-0838; Product Identifier 2017-
NE-33-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December 18, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Safran Helicopter Engines S.A. Arriel 2E
turboshaft engines with front support, part number 0 292 11 715 0,
installed (pre-mod TU 197 configuration).
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 8300, Accessory
Gearboxes.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of ruptured front support pins
on the accessory gearbox front support. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of a front support, loss of engine thrust control
and reduced control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
Before the accessory gearbox and transmission shaft module
(Module 01) accumulates 1,600 engine operating hours since new, or
within 80 engine operating hours after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later, replace the front support with a part
eligible for installation.
(h) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, a part eligible for installation is
a Module 01 with a pre-mod TU 197 front support, that has not
accumulated more than 1,680 engine operating hours since new; or a
Module 01 with a post-mod TU 197 front support.
(i) Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, you may not install a pre-
mod TU 197 front support on any engine with a post-mod TU 197 front
support installed.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, FAA, ECO Branch, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ECO Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Robert Green,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7754; fax: 781-238-7199; email:
robert.green@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2016-0235, dated November 24, 2016,
for more information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA-2017-0838.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 24, 2017.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-23606 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P