Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds Definition, 50811-50814 [2017-23468]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
50811
EPA-APPROVED MINNESOTA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS—Continued
Name of nonregulatory
SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
sulfur dioxide (SO2)
NAAQS.
Statewide ...................
6/12/2014 and 5/26/
2016.
11/2/2017, [insert
Federal Register
citation].
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS.
Statewide ...................
6/12/2014 and 5/26/
2016.
11/2/2017, [insert
Federal Register
citation].
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0323; FRL–9970–17–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile
Organic Compounds Definition
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Direct final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
submission as a revision to the Illinois
state implementation plan (SIP) for
ozone. The revision, submitted on May
30, 2017, incorporates changes to the
Illinois Administrative Code (IAC)
definition of volatile organic material,
otherwise known as volatile organic
compound (VOC). The revision removes
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements related to the use of tbutyl acetate (also known as tertiary
butyl acetate) as a VOC, and is in
response to an EPA rulemaking that
occurred in 2016. Illinois also added
information to provide clarity to the list
of compounds excluded from the
definition of VOC.
nlaroche on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Nov 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
EPA approved date
This direct final rule will be
effective January 2, 2018, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
December 4, 2017. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2017–0323 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section. For the
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2017–23461 Filed 11–1–17; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
State submittal date/
effective date
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
These actions address the following CAA
elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We
have not taken action on (D)(i)(I) or the
visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). We will address these requirements in a separate
action. EPA has disapproved the elements
related to the prevention of significant deterioration, specifically as they pertain to
section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and
(J); however, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules
for this purpose.
These actions address the following CAA
elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are
not taking action on (D)(i)(I) or the visibility
portion of (D)(i)(II). We will address these
requirements in a separate action. EPA
has disapproved the elements related to
the prevention of significant deterioration,
specifically as they pertain to section
110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J); however, Minnesota continues to implement
the Federally promulgated rules for this
purpose.
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–3031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What did Illinois submit?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
revision?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this
action?
The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the
regulation of VOC for various purposes.
Section 302(s) of the CAA specifies that
EPA has the authority to define the
meaning of ‘‘VOC,’’ and what
compounds shall be treated as VOC for
regulatory purposes.
Tropospheric ozone, commonly
known as smog, is formed when VOC
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
50812
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
nlaroche on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
and nitrogen oxides react in the
atmosphere in the presence of sunlight.
Because of the harmful effects of ozone,
EPA and state governments limit the
amount of VOC that can be released into
the atmosphere.
EPA uses the reactivity of ethane as
the threshold for determining whether a
compound makes a negligible
contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation. Compounds that are less
reactive than, or equally reactive to,
ethane under certain assumed
conditions may be deemed negligibly
reactive and, therefore, suitable for
exemption by EPA from the regulatory
definition of VOC. EPA lists compounds
it has determined to be negligibly
reactive in its regulations as being
excluded from the regulatory definition
of VOC in 40 CFR 51.100(s). See 81 FR
9339 (February 25, 2016).
Illinois’ SIP includes a definition of
VOC at 35 IAC Part 211, Subpart B,
Section 7150 (35 IAC 211.7150), which
conforms to EPA’s regulatory definition
of VOC. Subsection (a) of 35 IAC
211.7150 includes a list of compounds
excluded from the regulatory definition
of VOC, which reflect the compounds
EPA has excluded in 40 CFR 51.100(s)
on the basis that they make a negligible
contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation.
II. What did Illinois submit?
On May 30, 2017, Illinois submitted,
as a SIP revision, a change to the
definition of VOC at 35 IAC 211.7150 in
response to an EPA rulemaking in 2016
that updated an existing exemption for
the compound tertiary butyl acetate.
Illinois also submitted corrections to
chemical names and revisions to
chemical identifiers included in the list
of excluded compounds at 35 IAC
211.7150(a).
The Illinois SIP currently excludes
tertiary butyl acetate for purposes of
VOC emissions limitations or VOC
content requirements. However, the
Illinois SIP includes the compound as a
VOC for purposes of all recordkeeping,
emissions reporting, photochemical
dispersion modeling and inventory
requirements which apply to VOC. See
35 IAC 211.7150(e); 69 FR 69298
(November 29, 2004).
In response to an EPA rulemaking in
2016 (discussed further below), Illinois
is revising its SIP to remove the
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements related to the
use of t-butyl acetate as a VOC by
deleting subsection (e) of 35 IAC
211.7150.
Additionally, Illinois amended the list
of excluded compounds by adding the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Nov 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
International Union of Pure and
Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) names 1
and CAS registry numbers, 2 and
presenting common names
parenthetically.3 Illinois made these
changes to eliminate confusion and
make it easier to identify specific
excluded compounds in 35 IAC
211.7150(a).
For example, tertiary butyl acetate
bears the IUPAC name ‘‘1,1-dimethyl
ethyl acetic acid ester’’ and CAS number
540–88–5. EPA lists this compound as
‘‘t-butyl acetate’’ in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1).
Illinois continues to identify the
compound as tertiary butyl acetate, and
parenthetically added the IUPAC name
and CAS number in 35 IAC
211.7150(a).4
Finally, Illinois made an
administrative change by deleting the
words ‘‘of this Section’’ in 35 IAC
211.7150(d), which discusses
appropriate testing methods and
includes a reference to subsection (b) of
35 IAC 211.7150.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
revision?
Effective April 25, 2016, EPA
amended the regulatory definition of
VOC to remove applicable
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements for the
compound tertiary butyl acetate. (81 FR
9339).
EPA had previously excluded tertiary
butyl acetate from the definition of VOC
for purposes of VOC emissions
limitations and VOC content
requirements on the basis that it makes
a negligible contribution to tropospheric
ozone formation. However, EPA
continued to define tertiary butyl
acetate as a VOC for purposes of all
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements that apply to
VOC. See 69 FR 69298 (November 29,
2004). Tertiary butyl acetate was the
only compound that was excluded from
the VOC definition for purposes of
emission controls but still considered a
1 IUPAC has developed a recognized system of
nomenclature for chemical compounds.
2 Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) numbers are
developed by the American Chemical Society. CAS
numbers are in widespread use, and provide clarity
because a single CAS number identifies only one
chemical isomer.
3 In Table 6 of Attachment 7 to Illinois’ submittal,
Illinois lists the chemical compounds excluded
from the definition of VOC, using the designations
by EPA, IUPAC names, CAS numbers, and
commonly used alternative names for each.
4 EPA continues to include the CAS number to
further identify compounds when adopting an
exclusion from the definition of VOC. See 81 FR
9339 (February 25, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VOC for purposes of recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
In 2016, EPA removed the
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements related to tertiary butyl
acetate as a VOC in response to a
petition. In removing these
requirements, EPA stated that the
primary objective of the recordkeeping
and reporting requirements for tertiary
butyl acetate was to address the
cumulative impacts of ‘‘negligibly
reactive’’ compounds, and had
suggested that future exempt
compounds may also be subject to such
requirements. However, these
requirements had not been included in
any other proposed or final VOC
exemptions since the tertiary butyl
acetate rule in 2004. EPA found that
having high quality data on tertiary
butyl acetate emissions alone is unlikely
to be very useful in assessing the
cumulative impacts of negligibly
reactive compounds on ozone
formation, and therefore the
requirements were not achieving their
primary objective to inform more
accurate photochemical modeling in
support of SIP submissions.
EPA concluded that there was no
evidence that tertiary butyl acetate was
being used at levels that would cause
concern for ozone formation.
Additionally, the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, which were
unique among all VOC-exempt
compounds, were of limited utility
because they did not provide sufficient
information to judge the cumulative
impacts of exempted compounds, and
because the data had not been
consistently collected and reported by
states. As a result, EPA amended 40 CFR
51.100(s)(5) by removing the
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements for tertiary butyl
acetate as a VOC. This action did not
affect the existing exclusion of tertiary
butyl acetate from the regulatory
definition of VOC for purposes of
emission limits and control
requirements found in 40 CFR
51.100(s)(1). 81 FR 9339 (February 25,
2016).
Illinois’ SIP revision is consistent
with EPA’s action amending the
definition of VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5)
to exclude recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for tertiary butyl acetate.
Additionally, this revision did not affect
the existing exclusion of this compound
from the regulatory definition of VOC
for purposes of emission limits and
control requirements in 35 IAC
211.7150(a).
Furthermore, Illinois’ addition of
IUPAC names and CAS registry
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
numbers to the list of excluded
compounds in 35 IAC 211.7150(a) is
consistent with the Illinois SIP. Illinois
has kept the EPA designated names of
the compounds in the list, and added
information that may make it easier to
identify compounds that are excluded
from regulation as VOCs. These changes
do not interfere with the Federal listing
of excluded compounds, and provide
more specific chemical composition,
structural, and isomeric identification
information.
nlaroche on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to 35 IAC
211.7150 contained in the May 30, 2017,
submittal into the Illinois SIP. We are
publishing this action without prior
proposal because we view this as a
noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
state plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective January 2, 2018 without further
notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by December
4, 2017. If we receive such comments,
we will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. If we do not receive any
comments, this action will be effective
January 2, 2018.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of the Illinois Regulations
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. EPA has made,
and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Nov 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
State implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.5
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
5 62
PO 00000
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50813
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 2, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
50814
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.720, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended under ‘‘Part 211:
Definitions and General Provisions’’,
‘‘Subpart B: Definitions’’ by revising the
entry for 211.7150 ‘‘Volatile Organic
Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic
Compound (VOC)’’ to read as follows:
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.720
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
*
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED ILLINOIS REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
Illinois citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Comments
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions
*
*
*
*
Subpart B: Definitions
*
*
*
211.7150 ......................................
*
*
*
Volatile Organic Material (VOM)
Or Volatile Organic Compound
(VOC).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–23468 Filed 11–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0638; FRL–9969–93–
Region 3]
Determination of Attainment by the
Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone
Standard; Philadelphia-WilmingtonAtlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making a final
determination that the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MDDE marginal ozone nonattainment area
(the Philadelphia Area) has attained the
2008 ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) by the July 20, 2016
attainment date. This final
determination is based on complete,
nlaroche on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Nov 01, 2017
*
Jkt 244001
1/23/2017
*
11/2/2017, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
certified, and quality assured ambient
air quality monitoring data for the
Philadelphia Area for the 2013–2015
monitoring period. The effect of this
determination of attainment (DOA) is
that the Philadelphia Area will not be
bumped up or reclassified as a moderate
nonattainment area. The determination
of attainment is not equivalent to a
redesignation, and the States in the
Philadelphia Area must still meet the
statutory requirements for redesignation
in order to be redesignated to
attainment. This determination is also
not a clean data determination. This
action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 4, 2017.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0638. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 18, 2017 (82 FR 18268), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Philadelphia
Area. The Philadelphia Area consists of
Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery
and Philadelphia Counties in
Pennsylvania; Atlantic, Burlington,
Camden, Cape May, Cumberland,
Gloucester, Mercer, Ocean and Salem
Counties in New Jersey; Cecil County,
Maryland; and New Castle County in
Delaware. See 40 CFR 81.331, 81.339,
81.321, and 81.308. In the NPR, EPA
proposed to determine, in accordance
with its statutory obligations under
section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA and the
relevant regulatory provisions (40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50811-50814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23468]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0323; FRL-9970-17-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds
Definition
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
submission as a revision to the Illinois state implementation plan
(SIP) for ozone. The revision, submitted on May 30, 2017, incorporates
changes to the Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) definition of
volatile organic material, otherwise known as volatile organic compound
(VOC). The revision removes recordkeeping and reporting requirements
related to the use of t-butyl acetate (also known as tertiary butyl
acetate) as a VOC, and is in response to an EPA rulemaking that
occurred in 2016. Illinois also added information to provide clarity to
the list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective January 2, 2018, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by December 4, 2017. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2017-0323 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3031, hatten.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What did Illinois submit?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the regulation of VOC for various
purposes. Section 302(s) of the CAA specifies that EPA has the
authority to define the meaning of ``VOC,'' and what compounds shall be
treated as VOC for regulatory purposes.
Tropospheric ozone, commonly known as smog, is formed when VOC
[[Page 50812]]
and nitrogen oxides react in the atmosphere in the presence of
sunlight. Because of the harmful effects of ozone, EPA and state
governments limit the amount of VOC that can be released into the
atmosphere.
EPA uses the reactivity of ethane as the threshold for determining
whether a compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric
ozone formation. Compounds that are less reactive than, or equally
reactive to, ethane under certain assumed conditions may be deemed
negligibly reactive and, therefore, suitable for exemption by EPA from
the regulatory definition of VOC. EPA lists compounds it has determined
to be negligibly reactive in its regulations as being excluded from the
regulatory definition of VOC in 40 CFR 51.100(s). See 81 FR 9339
(February 25, 2016).
Illinois' SIP includes a definition of VOC at 35 IAC Part 211,
Subpart B, Section 7150 (35 IAC 211.7150), which conforms to EPA's
regulatory definition of VOC. Subsection (a) of 35 IAC 211.7150
includes a list of compounds excluded from the regulatory definition of
VOC, which reflect the compounds EPA has excluded in 40 CFR 51.100(s)
on the basis that they make a negligible contribution to tropospheric
ozone formation.
II. What did Illinois submit?
On May 30, 2017, Illinois submitted, as a SIP revision, a change to
the definition of VOC at 35 IAC 211.7150 in response to an EPA
rulemaking in 2016 that updated an existing exemption for the compound
tertiary butyl acetate. Illinois also submitted corrections to chemical
names and revisions to chemical identifiers included in the list of
excluded compounds at 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
The Illinois SIP currently excludes tertiary butyl acetate for
purposes of VOC emissions limitations or VOC content requirements.
However, the Illinois SIP includes the compound as a VOC for purposes
of all recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion
modeling and inventory requirements which apply to VOC. See 35 IAC
211.7150(e); 69 FR 69298 (November 29, 2004).
In response to an EPA rulemaking in 2016 (discussed further below),
Illinois is revising its SIP to remove the recordkeeping, emissions
reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements
related to the use of t-butyl acetate as a VOC by deleting subsection
(e) of 35 IAC 211.7150.
Additionally, Illinois amended the list of excluded compounds by
adding the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)
names \1\ and CAS registry numbers, \2\ and presenting common names
parenthetically.\3\ Illinois made these changes to eliminate confusion
and make it easier to identify specific excluded compounds in 35 IAC
211.7150(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ IUPAC has developed a recognized system of nomenclature for
chemical compounds.
\2\ Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) numbers are developed by the
American Chemical Society. CAS numbers are in widespread use, and
provide clarity because a single CAS number identifies only one
chemical isomer.
\3\ In Table 6 of Attachment 7 to Illinois' submittal, Illinois
lists the chemical compounds excluded from the definition of VOC,
using the designations by EPA, IUPAC names, CAS numbers, and
commonly used alternative names for each.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, tertiary butyl acetate bears the IUPAC name ``1,1-
dimethyl ethyl acetic acid ester'' and CAS number 540-88-5. EPA lists
this compound as ``t-butyl acetate'' in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). Illinois
continues to identify the compound as tertiary butyl acetate, and
parenthetically added the IUPAC name and CAS number in 35 IAC
211.7150(a).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ EPA continues to include the CAS number to further identify
compounds when adopting an exclusion from the definition of VOC. See
81 FR 9339 (February 25, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, Illinois made an administrative change by deleting the
words ``of this Section'' in 35 IAC 211.7150(d), which discusses
appropriate testing methods and includes a reference to subsection (b)
of 35 IAC 211.7150.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision?
Effective April 25, 2016, EPA amended the regulatory definition of
VOC to remove applicable recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements for the
compound tertiary butyl acetate. (81 FR 9339).
EPA had previously excluded tertiary butyl acetate from the
definition of VOC for purposes of VOC emissions limitations and VOC
content requirements on the basis that it makes a negligible
contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. However, EPA continued to
define tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC for purposes of all
recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling
and inventory requirements that apply to VOC. See 69 FR 69298 (November
29, 2004). Tertiary butyl acetate was the only compound that was
excluded from the VOC definition for purposes of emission controls but
still considered a VOC for purposes of recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
In 2016, EPA removed the recordkeeping and reporting requirements
related to tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC in response to a petition.
In removing these requirements, EPA stated that the primary objective
of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for tertiary butyl
acetate was to address the cumulative impacts of ``negligibly
reactive'' compounds, and had suggested that future exempt compounds
may also be subject to such requirements. However, these requirements
had not been included in any other proposed or final VOC exemptions
since the tertiary butyl acetate rule in 2004. EPA found that having
high quality data on tertiary butyl acetate emissions alone is unlikely
to be very useful in assessing the cumulative impacts of negligibly
reactive compounds on ozone formation, and therefore the requirements
were not achieving their primary objective to inform more accurate
photochemical modeling in support of SIP submissions.
EPA concluded that there was no evidence that tertiary butyl
acetate was being used at levels that would cause concern for ozone
formation. Additionally, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
which were unique among all VOC-exempt compounds, were of limited
utility because they did not provide sufficient information to judge
the cumulative impacts of exempted compounds, and because the data had
not been consistently collected and reported by states. As a result,
EPA amended 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) by removing the recordkeeping,
emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory
requirements for tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC. This action did not
affect the existing exclusion of tertiary butyl acetate from the
regulatory definition of VOC for purposes of emission limits and
control requirements found in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). 81 FR 9339 (February
25, 2016).
Illinois' SIP revision is consistent with EPA's action amending the
definition of VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) to exclude recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for tertiary butyl acetate. Additionally, this
revision did not affect the existing exclusion of this compound from
the regulatory definition of VOC for purposes of emission limits and
control requirements in 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
Furthermore, Illinois' addition of IUPAC names and CAS registry
[[Page 50813]]
numbers to the list of excluded compounds in 35 IAC 211.7150(a) is
consistent with the Illinois SIP. Illinois has kept the EPA designated
names of the compounds in the list, and added information that may make
it easier to identify compounds that are excluded from regulation as
VOCs. These changes do not interfere with the Federal listing of
excluded compounds, and provide more specific chemical composition,
structural, and isomeric identification information.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to 35 IAC 211.7150 contained in the May
30, 2017, submittal into the Illinois SIP. We are publishing this
action without prior proposal because we view this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However,
in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the state plan if relevant adverse written comments are filed.
This rule will be effective January 2, 2018 without further notice
unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by December 4,
2017. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action before
the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not receive any
comments, this action will be effective January 2, 2018.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Illinois
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director
of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 2, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
[[Page 50814]]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.720, the table in paragraph (c) is amended under ``Part
211: Definitions and General Provisions'', ``Subpart B: Definitions''
by revising the entry for 211.7150 ``Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.720 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Illinois Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Illinois citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Comments
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart B: Definitions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
211.7150....................... Volatile Organic 1/23/2017 11/2/2017, ............................
Material (VOM) [insert Federal
Or Volatile Register
Organic Compound citation].
(VOC).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-23468 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P