Merchant Marine Act and Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fishing Vessel, Fishing Facility and Individual Fishing Quota and Harvesting Rights Lending Program Regulations, 50363-50366 [2017-23570]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 4333–15–C
References Cited
A complete list of references cited in
this document is available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2016–0086 and
upon request from the Montana
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this document
are the staff members of the Montana
Ecological Services Field Office.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: September 28, 2017.
James W. Kurth,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–23579 Filed 10–30–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 253
[Docket No. 170404355–7355–01]
RIN 0648–BG80
Merchant Marine Act and MagnusonStevens Act Provisions; Fishing
Vessel, Fishing Facility and Individual
Fishing Quota and Harvesting Rights
Lending Program Regulations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS’ Fisheries Finance
Program (FFP) provides long-term
financing to the commercial fishing and
aquaculture industries for fishing
vessels, fisheries facilities, aquaculture
facilities, and certain designated
individual fishing quota (IFQ). Section
302 of the Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114–120) included
new authority to finance the purchase of
harvesting rights in a fishery that is
federally managed under a limited
access system. The FFP proposes to add
a new section to the existing FFP
regulations to implement this statutory
change. The net effect of this proposed
change to the regulations will be to
provide additional authority for the
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 30, 2017
Jkt 244001
program to lend, while leaving the
original IFQ authority to Fishery
Management Councils to use as needed.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in
writing on or before November 30, 2017,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2017–0064,
by any one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170064, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Paul Marx, Chief, Financial
Services Division, NMFS, Attn: F/MB5,
1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to paul.marx@
noaa.gov and by email to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)
395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Marx, at 301–427–8771 or via email at
paul.marx@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
authority of Chapter 537 of Title 46 of
the United States Code, 46 U.S.C. 53701,
et seq., the FFP may provide long-term
financing to the commercial fishing and
aquaculture industries for fishing
vessels, fisheries facilities, aquaculture
facilities, and certain designated
individual fishing quota (IFQs). Section
302 of the Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114–120) amended
Chapter 537, providing the FFP with the
authority to finance the purchase of
harvesting rights in a fishery that is
federally managed under a limited
access system. This amendment is
codified at 46 U.S.C. 53702(b)(4)(B).
This action would modify the existing
Program regulations to reflect this
statutory change. The net effect of this
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50363
change will be to provide additional
authority for the program to lend, while
leaving the original IFQ authority to
Fishery Management Councils (FMCs)
to use as needed.
Existing IFQ Loan Authority
46 U.S.C. 53706 authorizes the FFP to
finance or refinance the purchase of
individual fishing quotas in accordance
with section 303(d)(4) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA), now codified
at 16 U.S.C. 1853a(g). Under this
provision of the MSA, an FMC may
submit, and NMFS may approve and
implement, a loan program to aid in (1)
the acquisition of IFQ by fishermen who
fish from ‘‘small vessels,’’ and (2) the
first time purchase of IFQ by ‘‘entry
level fishermen.’’ Therefore, under this
authority, the FFP cannot initiate or
implement a lending program to finance
or refinance the purchase of IFQ until
the appropriate FMC submits a request
to NMFS and provides guidance for the
requisite criteria.
NMFS currently administers two loan
programs pursuant to the existing IFQ
authority: The Northwest Halibut/
Sablefish and Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Crab IFQ loan programs. NMFS
anticipates no effects to either of these
existing loan programs as a result of this
proposed action.
New Loan Authority
The new authority provided by Public
Law 114–120 broadens the FFP’s
existing authority, and authorizes the
Program to finance the purchase of
harvesting rights in a fishery that is
federally managed under a limited
access system. NMFS will interpret
‘‘limited access system’’ in accordance
with section 3(27) of the MSA for
purposes of this authority. The MSA
defines ‘‘limited access system’’ as ‘‘a
system that limits participation in a
fishery to those satisfying certain
eligibility criteria or requirements
contained in a fishery management plan
or associated regulation.’’ 16 U.S.C.
1802(27). Such definition includes, but
is not limited to, IFQ fisheries.
The new authority provided by Public
Law 114–120 does not require FMCs to
initiate a request to establish a loan
program in a fishery that is federally
managed under a limited access system
in order for the FFP to provide financing
in such a fishery. However, under the
MSA, FMCs are primarily responsible
for developing fishery management
plans (FMPs) for fisheries within their
authority that require conservation and
management. It is possible that the
availability of fisheries loans may have
unanticipated effects on the
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
50364
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Proposed Rules
achievement of FMP goals and
objectives. Therefore, NMFS believes it
appropriate to allow the FMCs to
comment on the potential or actual
effect of a loan program for harvesting
rights in fisheries under their authority.
An FMC may provide an explanation to
NMFS at any time, in writing, why the
potential or continuing availability of
financing for harvesting rights in a
fishery under its authority would harm
the achievement of the goals and
objectives of the FMP applicable to the
fishery. If NMFS accepts the Council’s
reasoning, harvesting rights loans would
not be provided, or would cease to be
provided, in that fishery. In such a
scenario, NMFS would publish a notice
in the Federal Register notifying the
public that new loans will not be made
in that fishery. If there were already
loan applications under consideration,
the exceptional circumstances would
justify NMFS returning any loan fees
submitted with loan applications. The
opportunity for FMC input will help
ensure that loans made by the FFP do
not undermine or conflict with the goals
and objectives of specific FMPs.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Extent of Financing
Section 302 of the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2015 imposes no
limitations on the extent of financing to
be provided by the FFP for the purchase
of harvesting rights. However, it does
reserve $59 million of direct loan
authority for historical uses, defined at
46 U.S.C. 53701(8). Thus, NMFS
anticipates that the balance of annual
direct loan authority—currently $41
million—may be available to finance or
refinance the purchase of harvesting
rights in federally managed fisheries
under a limited access system. This
action will allow NMFS to fully use the
program’s loan authority either for
historical purposes or any authorized
new purposes should it be determined
that demand or lack of demand in either
area would result in unused loan
authority.
Proposed Harvesting Rights Lending
Lending for harvesting rights would
follow existing FFP lending procedures
and guidelines. Borrowers must be U.S.
citizens or entities eligible to document
a vessel for coastwise trade under 46
U.S.C. 50501, meet all general FFP
requirements, and meet all requirements
to hold the harvesting rights under the
applicable FMP at the time of loan
closing. The FFP may require additional
lending conditions and security terms
such as loan guarantees or security
interests in other collateral to bring
credit risk to acceptable levels.
Affiliated businesses, the borrower’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 30, 2017
Jkt 244001
principals or majority shareholders,
persons or entities with a financial
interest in the borrower, or any
individuals holding community
property rights may also be required to
provide a guaranty.
In addition, all loan applicants are
subject to background and credit
investigations, which may include, but
are not limited to, reviews for
unresolved fishing violations, criminal
background checks, delinquent debt
investigations, and credit reports. Like
other FFP loan programs, lending for
harvesting rights is subject to a statutory
loan limit of up to 80 percent of the
actual cost of the transaction, set as the
purchase price or, in the case of
refinancing, the current market value.
The FFP retains sole discretion to
determine the transaction’s actual cost
or current market value.
Harvesting rights loan amounts can
carry up to a 25-year term and can be
used to either purchase new rights or
refinance the debt associated with the
prior purchase(s) of harvesting rights. In
addition to maintaining a 20 percent
minimum equity stake, borrowers
refinancing existing debt will only
receive the lesser of the outstanding
amount of debt to be refinanced or 80
percent of the current market value of
the harvesting right.
If a borrower seeking refinancing fails
to have the requisite 20 percent equity
stake (measured as the difference
between the current market value of the
primary collateral and the amount of the
loan), that borrower will need to pay
down debt to meet the required level. In
addition, under FFP standards,
borrowers are only eligible for
refinancing if their initial purchase
would have been eligible for financing.
The program will refinance harvesting
rights acquired prior to this regulation if
the buyer’s original purchase would
have been eligible for FFP financing
under the terms of this action.
Prospective borrowers may apply for
a loan through any of the NOAA
Fisheries Service regional FFP offices
(St. Petersburg, FL; Gloucester, MA;
Seattle, WA). They must pay the
appropriate application fee, set by 46
U.S.C. 53713(b) as one-half of one
percent of the loan amount requested,
which is made up of two parts. Half is
the ‘‘filing fee,’’ and is nonrefundable
when the FFP officially accepts the
application. The other half, known as
the ‘‘commitment fee,’’ becomes
nonrefundable when the FFP executes
and mails an Approval-in-Principle
(AIP) letter to the applicant. The FFP
may refund the commitment fee if the
FFP declines the application or the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
application is withdrawn prior to the
issuance of an AIP letter.
Summary and Explanation of Proposed
Regulatory Changes
This proposed action would add the
following section, as explained here.
Harvesting Rights Loans (253.31)
This new section provides regulatory
provisions specific to the harvesting
rights loans. At the time a borrower
submits an application, he or she must
satisfy the criteria listed in this new
section in order to be eligible to receive
financing under the program. The
borrower must comply with any
limitations on the quantity of harvesting
rights that may be owned by one holder,
as specified in the applicable FMP and
implementing regulations. The FFP will
not finance harvesting rights in excess
of ownership limitations.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under
the authority of, and is consistent with,
Chapter 537 of Title 46 of the United
States Code and the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, as amended. The NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with Chapter
537 of Title 46 of the U.S. Code, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended,
and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
In addition to public comment about
the proposed rule’s substance, NMFS
also seeks public comment on any
ambiguity or unnecessary complexity
from the language used in this proposed
rule.
NEPA
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that this rule qualifies to be
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review. This action is consistent
with categories of activities identified in
CE G7 of the Companion Manual for
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6A,
and we have not identified any
extraordinary circumstances that would
preclude this categorical exclusion.
NMFS is accepting comments and
information during the public comment
period for the proposed rule relevant to
our preliminary categorical exclusion
determination.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other relevant Federal rules.
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
This proposed rule contains
collections-of-information subject to the
PRA, which have been approved by
OMB under control number 0648–0012.
The application requirements contained
in these rules have been approved under
OMB control number 0648–0012. Public
reporting burden for placing an
application for FFP financing is
estimated to average eight hours per
response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)
395–7285.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., requires that,
‘‘[w]henever an agency is required by
section 553 of this title [5 USCS § 553],
or any other law, to publish general
notice of proposed rulemaking for any
proposed rule, or publishes a notice of
proposed rulemaking for an
interpretative rule involving the internal
revenue laws of the United States, the
agency shall prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. Such analysis shall
describe the impact of the proposed rule
on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
However, where an agency can certify
‘‘that the rule will not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities’’
then an agency need not undertake a
full regulatory flexibility analysis. 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
Participation in the FFP is entirely
voluntary. This action imposes no
mandatory requirements on any
business. Once final, this proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 30, 2017
Jkt 244001
will implement programs authorized by
law. Specifically, these rules enact
regulatory additions to create a new
lending purpose authorized by Section
302 of the Coast Guard Authorization
Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114–120) and will
be implemented in accordance with 50
CFR part 253, subpart B. This action
will create new § 253.31.
As defined by NMFS for RFA
purposes, this rule may affect small
fishing entities that have annual
revenues of $11.0 million or less,
including, but not limited to, vessel
owners, vessel operators, individual
fishermen, small corporations, and
others engaged in commercial fishing
activities regulated by NOAA.
Borrowers under this authority may also
include large businesses. Notably,
because the FFP is a voluntary program
that provides loans to qualified
borrowers, non-borrowers—large or
small—would not be regulated by this
rule.
Although the FFP requires certain
supporting documentation during the
life of a loan, the requirements do not
impose unusual burdens when
compared to the burdens imposed by
other lenders. Moreover, because the
basic need for financing would continue
to exist without the FFP, the individuals
seeking financing would still need to
comply with similar, if not identical,
requirements imposed by another
lender. Records required to participate
in the FFP are usually within the
normal records already maintained by
fishermen. It should take fewer than
eight hours per application to meet
these requirements.
The information required from
borrowers, such as income tax returns,
insurance policies, permits, licenses,
etc., is already available to them.
Depending on circumstances, the FFP
may require other supporting
documents, including financial
statements, property descriptions, and
other documents that can be acquired at
reasonable cost if they are not already
available.
FFP lending is a source of long-term,
fixed rate capital financing and imposes
no regulatory requirements on anyone
other than those applying for loans. FFP
borrowers make a voluntary decision to
use the available lending.
These loan programs will only have
positive impacts on borrowers. Because
participation is voluntary and requires
effort and the outlay of an application
fee, borrowers for harvesting rights
financing are assumed to have made a
determination that using FFP financing
provides a benefit, such that the FFP’s
long-term, fixed rate financing provides
only a positive economic impact.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50365
Importantly, the FFP does not regulate
or manage the affairs of its borrowers,
and the regulations impose no
additional compliance, operating or
other fees or costs on small entities
other than a financing relationship
would require.
As a result of this certification, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been
prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 253
Aquaculture, Community
development groups, Direct lending,
Financial assistance, Fisheries, Fishing,
Individual fishing quota, harvesting
rights (privileges).
Dated: October 25, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 253, subpart B, as follows:
PART 253—FISHERIES ASSISTANCE
PROGRAMS
Subpart B—Fisheries Finance Program
1. The authority citation for part 253
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53701 and 16 U.S.C.
4101 et seq.
2. Section 253.31 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 253.31
Harvesting rights loans.
(a) Specific definitions. For the
purposes of this section, the following
definitions apply:
(1) Harvesting right(s) means any
privilege to harvest fish in a fishery that
is federally managed under a limited
access system.
(2) Limited access system has the
same meaning given to that term in
section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (16 U.S.C. 1802).
(3) [Reserved]
(b) Loan Requirements and
Limitations. These loan requirements
and limitations apply to individuals or
entities who seek to finance or refinance
the acquisition of harvesting rights.
(1) The borrower must meet all
regulatory and statutory requirements to
hold the harvesting rights at the time
any such loan or refinancing loan would
close.
(2) NMFS will accept and consider
the input of a Regional Fishery
Management Council at any time
regarding the availability of loans in a
fishery under the Council’s authority.
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
50366
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(i) The Council may submit an
explanation to NMFS, in writing, as to
why the availability of financing for
harvesting rights in a fishery would
harm the achievement of the goals and
objectives of the Fishery Management
Plan applicable to the fishery. If NMFS
accepts the Council’s reasoning,
harvesting rights loans will not be
provided, or will cease to be provided,
in that fishery.
(ii) If NMFS determines that
harvesting rights loans will not be
provided in a fishery, NMFS will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
notifying the public that new loans will
not be made in that fishery.
(iii) In such a scenario, pending
applications will be returned and loan
fees returned as exceptional
circumstances justify the action.
(3) The harvesting rights to be
financed must be issued in a manner in
which they can be individually
identified such that a valid and specific
security interest can be recorded. This
determination shall be solely made by
the Program.
(c) Refinancing. (1) The Program may
refinance any existing debts associated
with harvesting rights a borrower
currently holds, provided that:
(i) The harvesting rights being
refinanced would have been eligible for
Program financing at the time the
borrower purchased them, if Program
financing had been available,
(ii) The borrower meets all other
applicable lending requirements, and
(iii) The refinancing is in an amount
up to 80 percent of the harvesting rights’
current market value, as determined at
the sole discretion of the Program, and
subject to the limitation that the
Program will not disburse any amount
that exceeds the outstanding principal
balance, plus accrued interest (if any), of
the existing harvesting rights’ debt being
refinanced or its fair market value,
whichever is less.
(2) In the event that the current
market value of harvesting rights and
principal loan balance do not meet the
80 percent requirement in paragraph
(1)(iii) of this section, borrowers seeking
refinancing may be required to provide
additional down payment.
(d) Maturity. Loan maturity may not
exceed 25 years, but may be shorter
depending on credit and other
considerations.
(e) Repayment. Repayment will be by
equal quarterly installments of principal
and interest.
(f) Security. Although harvesting
right(s) will be the primary collateral for
a loan, the Program may require
additional security pledges to maintain
the priority of the Program’s security
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 30, 2017
Jkt 244001
interest. The Program, at its option, may
also require all parties with significant
ownership interests to personally
guarantee loan repayment for any
borrower that is a corporation,
partnership, or other entity, including
collateral to secure the guarantees. Some
projects may require additional security,
collateral, or credit enhancement as
determined, in the sole discretion, by
the Program.
(g) Program credit standards.
Harvesting rights loans, regardless of
purpose, are subject to all Program
general credit standards and
requirements. Collateral, guarantee and
other requirements may be adjusted to
individual credit risks.
[FR Doc. 2017–23570 Filed 10–30–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 170817773–7905–1]
RIN 0648–BG81
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Highly Migratory Fisheries; California
Drift Gillnet Fishery; Implementation of
a Federal Limited Entry Drift Gillnet
Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is proposing
regulations under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA) to implement a March 2017
recommendation by the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) to
amend the Fishery Management Plan for
U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species (HMS FMP). The
proposed rule would bring the State of
California’s limited entry (LE) drift
gillnet (DGN) permit program under
MSA authority. All current California
DGN permit holders would be eligible to
apply for, and receive, a Federal DGN
permit, and no additional DGN permits
would be created. The proposed rule is
administrative in nature and is not
anticipated to result in increased
activity, effort, or capacity in the
fishery.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
and supporting documents must be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submitted in writing on or before
December 15, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2017–0052, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170052, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Lyle Enriquez, NMFS West Coast
Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the
identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2017–0052’’
in the comments.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure they are received,
documented, and considered by NMFS.
Comments sent by any other method, to
any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period, may not be considered. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to the West Coast
Regional Office and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)
395–5806.
Copies of the draft Regulatory Impact
Review and other supporting documents
are available via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA–
NMFS–2017–0052 or by contacting the
Regional Administrator, Barry Thom,
NMFS West Coast Region, 1201 NE
Lloyd Blvd., Portland, OR 97232–2182,
or RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@
noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyle
Enriquez, NMFS, West Coast Region,
562–980–4025, or Lyle.Enriquez@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The HMS
FMP was prepared by the Council and
is implemented under the authority of
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50363-50366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 253
[Docket No. 170404355-7355-01]
RIN 0648-BG80
Merchant Marine Act and Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fishing
Vessel, Fishing Facility and Individual Fishing Quota and Harvesting
Rights Lending Program Regulations
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS' Fisheries Finance Program (FFP) provides long-term
financing to the commercial fishing and aquaculture industries for
fishing vessels, fisheries facilities, aquaculture facilities, and
certain designated individual fishing quota (IFQ). Section 302 of the
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-120) included new
authority to finance the purchase of harvesting rights in a fishery
that is federally managed under a limited access system. The FFP
proposes to add a new section to the existing FFP regulations to
implement this statutory change. The net effect of this proposed change
to the regulations will be to provide additional authority for the
program to lend, while leaving the original IFQ authority to Fishery
Management Councils to use as needed.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing on or before November 30,
2017,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2017-0064,
by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0064, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Paul Marx, Chief, Financial Services Division, NMFS,
Attn: F/MB5, 1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to [email protected] and by email to
[email protected] or fax to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Marx, at 301-427-8771 or via
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of Chapter 537 of Title
46 of the United States Code, 46 U.S.C. 53701, et seq., the FFP may
provide long-term financing to the commercial fishing and aquaculture
industries for fishing vessels, fisheries facilities, aquaculture
facilities, and certain designated individual fishing quota (IFQs).
Section 302 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-
120) amended Chapter 537, providing the FFP with the authority to
finance the purchase of harvesting rights in a fishery that is
federally managed under a limited access system. This amendment is
codified at 46 U.S.C. 53702(b)(4)(B). This action would modify the
existing Program regulations to reflect this statutory change. The net
effect of this change will be to provide additional authority for the
program to lend, while leaving the original IFQ authority to Fishery
Management Councils (FMCs) to use as needed.
Existing IFQ Loan Authority
46 U.S.C. 53706 authorizes the FFP to finance or refinance the
purchase of individual fishing quotas in accordance with section
303(d)(4) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA), now codified at 16 U.S.C. 1853a(g). Under this provision of
the MSA, an FMC may submit, and NMFS may approve and implement, a loan
program to aid in (1) the acquisition of IFQ by fishermen who fish from
``small vessels,'' and (2) the first time purchase of IFQ by ``entry
level fishermen.'' Therefore, under this authority, the FFP cannot
initiate or implement a lending program to finance or refinance the
purchase of IFQ until the appropriate FMC submits a request to NMFS and
provides guidance for the requisite criteria.
NMFS currently administers two loan programs pursuant to the
existing IFQ authority: The Northwest Halibut/Sablefish and Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Crab IFQ loan programs. NMFS anticipates no
effects to either of these existing loan programs as a result of this
proposed action.
New Loan Authority
The new authority provided by Public Law 114-120 broadens the FFP's
existing authority, and authorizes the Program to finance the purchase
of harvesting rights in a fishery that is federally managed under a
limited access system. NMFS will interpret ``limited access system'' in
accordance with section 3(27) of the MSA for purposes of this
authority. The MSA defines ``limited access system'' as ``a system that
limits participation in a fishery to those satisfying certain
eligibility criteria or requirements contained in a fishery management
plan or associated regulation.'' 16 U.S.C. 1802(27). Such definition
includes, but is not limited to, IFQ fisheries.
The new authority provided by Public Law 114-120 does not require
FMCs to initiate a request to establish a loan program in a fishery
that is federally managed under a limited access system in order for
the FFP to provide financing in such a fishery. However, under the MSA,
FMCs are primarily responsible for developing fishery management plans
(FMPs) for fisheries within their authority that require conservation
and management. It is possible that the availability of fisheries loans
may have unanticipated effects on the
[[Page 50364]]
achievement of FMP goals and objectives. Therefore, NMFS believes it
appropriate to allow the FMCs to comment on the potential or actual
effect of a loan program for harvesting rights in fisheries under their
authority. An FMC may provide an explanation to NMFS at any time, in
writing, why the potential or continuing availability of financing for
harvesting rights in a fishery under its authority would harm the
achievement of the goals and objectives of the FMP applicable to the
fishery. If NMFS accepts the Council's reasoning, harvesting rights
loans would not be provided, or would cease to be provided, in that
fishery. In such a scenario, NMFS would publish a notice in the Federal
Register notifying the public that new loans will not be made in that
fishery. If there were already loan applications under consideration,
the exceptional circumstances would justify NMFS returning any loan
fees submitted with loan applications. The opportunity for FMC input
will help ensure that loans made by the FFP do not undermine or
conflict with the goals and objectives of specific FMPs.
Extent of Financing
Section 302 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 imposes no
limitations on the extent of financing to be provided by the FFP for
the purchase of harvesting rights. However, it does reserve $59 million
of direct loan authority for historical uses, defined at 46 U.S.C.
53701(8). Thus, NMFS anticipates that the balance of annual direct loan
authority--currently $41 million--may be available to finance or
refinance the purchase of harvesting rights in federally managed
fisheries under a limited access system. This action will allow NMFS to
fully use the program's loan authority either for historical purposes
or any authorized new purposes should it be determined that demand or
lack of demand in either area would result in unused loan authority.
Proposed Harvesting Rights Lending
Lending for harvesting rights would follow existing FFP lending
procedures and guidelines. Borrowers must be U.S. citizens or entities
eligible to document a vessel for coastwise trade under 46 U.S.C.
50501, meet all general FFP requirements, and meet all requirements to
hold the harvesting rights under the applicable FMP at the time of loan
closing. The FFP may require additional lending conditions and security
terms such as loan guarantees or security interests in other collateral
to bring credit risk to acceptable levels. Affiliated businesses, the
borrower's principals or majority shareholders, persons or entities
with a financial interest in the borrower, or any individuals holding
community property rights may also be required to provide a guaranty.
In addition, all loan applicants are subject to background and
credit investigations, which may include, but are not limited to,
reviews for unresolved fishing violations, criminal background checks,
delinquent debt investigations, and credit reports. Like other FFP loan
programs, lending for harvesting rights is subject to a statutory loan
limit of up to 80 percent of the actual cost of the transaction, set as
the purchase price or, in the case of refinancing, the current market
value. The FFP retains sole discretion to determine the transaction's
actual cost or current market value.
Harvesting rights loan amounts can carry up to a 25-year term and
can be used to either purchase new rights or refinance the debt
associated with the prior purchase(s) of harvesting rights. In addition
to maintaining a 20 percent minimum equity stake, borrowers refinancing
existing debt will only receive the lesser of the outstanding amount of
debt to be refinanced or 80 percent of the current market value of the
harvesting right.
If a borrower seeking refinancing fails to have the requisite 20
percent equity stake (measured as the difference between the current
market value of the primary collateral and the amount of the loan),
that borrower will need to pay down debt to meet the required level. In
addition, under FFP standards, borrowers are only eligible for
refinancing if their initial purchase would have been eligible for
financing. The program will refinance harvesting rights acquired prior
to this regulation if the buyer's original purchase would have been
eligible for FFP financing under the terms of this action.
Prospective borrowers may apply for a loan through any of the NOAA
Fisheries Service regional FFP offices (St. Petersburg, FL; Gloucester,
MA; Seattle, WA). They must pay the appropriate application fee, set by
46 U.S.C. 53713(b) as one-half of one percent of the loan amount
requested, which is made up of two parts. Half is the ``filing fee,''
and is nonrefundable when the FFP officially accepts the application.
The other half, known as the ``commitment fee,'' becomes nonrefundable
when the FFP executes and mails an Approval-in-Principle (AIP) letter
to the applicant. The FFP may refund the commitment fee if the FFP
declines the application or the application is withdrawn prior to the
issuance of an AIP letter.
Summary and Explanation of Proposed Regulatory Changes
This proposed action would add the following section, as explained
here.
Harvesting Rights Loans (253.31)
This new section provides regulatory provisions specific to the
harvesting rights loans. At the time a borrower submits an application,
he or she must satisfy the criteria listed in this new section in order
to be eligible to receive financing under the program. The borrower
must comply with any limitations on the quantity of harvesting rights
that may be owned by one holder, as specified in the applicable FMP and
implementing regulations. The FFP will not finance harvesting rights in
excess of ownership limitations.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of, and is
consistent with, Chapter 537 of Title 46 of the United States Code and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended. The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with Chapter 537
of Title 46 of the U.S. Code, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended, and
other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public
comment.
In addition to public comment about the proposed rule's substance,
NMFS also seeks public comment on any ambiguity or unnecessary
complexity from the language used in this proposed rule.
NEPA
NMFS has preliminarily determined that this rule qualifies to be
categorically excluded from further NEPA review. This action is
consistent with categories of activities identified in CE G7 of the
Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-6A, and we have not
identified any extraordinary circumstances that would preclude this
categorical exclusion. NMFS is accepting comments and information
during the public comment period for the proposed rule relevant to our
preliminary categorical exclusion determination.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other relevant Federal rules.
[[Page 50365]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
This proposed rule contains collections-of-information subject to
the PRA, which have been approved by OMB under control number 0648-
0012. The application requirements contained in these rules have been
approved under OMB control number 0648-0012. Public reporting burden
for placing an application for FFP financing is estimated to average
eight hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect
of this data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden,
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to [email protected] or
fax to (202) 395-7285.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
requires that, ``[w]henever an agency is required by section 553 of
this title [5 USCS Sec. 553], or any other law, to publish general
notice of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule, or publishes a
notice of proposed rulemaking for an interpretative rule involving the
internal revenue laws of the United States, the agency shall prepare
and make available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis. Such analysis shall describe the impact of the proposed rule
on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603(a). However, where an agency can
certify ``that the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities'' then an
agency need not undertake a full regulatory flexibility analysis. 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
Participation in the FFP is entirely voluntary. This action imposes
no mandatory requirements on any business. Once final, this proposed
rule will implement programs authorized by law. Specifically, these
rules enact regulatory additions to create a new lending purpose
authorized by Section 302 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015
(Pub. L. 114-120) and will be implemented in accordance with 50 CFR
part 253, subpart B. This action will create new Sec. 253.31.
As defined by NMFS for RFA purposes, this rule may affect small
fishing entities that have annual revenues of $11.0 million or less,
including, but not limited to, vessel owners, vessel operators,
individual fishermen, small corporations, and others engaged in
commercial fishing activities regulated by NOAA. Borrowers under this
authority may also include large businesses. Notably, because the FFP
is a voluntary program that provides loans to qualified borrowers, non-
borrowers--large or small--would not be regulated by this rule.
Although the FFP requires certain supporting documentation during
the life of a loan, the requirements do not impose unusual burdens when
compared to the burdens imposed by other lenders. Moreover, because the
basic need for financing would continue to exist without the FFP, the
individuals seeking financing would still need to comply with similar,
if not identical, requirements imposed by another lender. Records
required to participate in the FFP are usually within the normal
records already maintained by fishermen. It should take fewer than
eight hours per application to meet these requirements.
The information required from borrowers, such as income tax
returns, insurance policies, permits, licenses, etc., is already
available to them. Depending on circumstances, the FFP may require
other supporting documents, including financial statements, property
descriptions, and other documents that can be acquired at reasonable
cost if they are not already available.
FFP lending is a source of long-term, fixed rate capital financing
and imposes no regulatory requirements on anyone other than those
applying for loans. FFP borrowers make a voluntary decision to use the
available lending.
These loan programs will only have positive impacts on borrowers.
Because participation is voluntary and requires effort and the outlay
of an application fee, borrowers for harvesting rights financing are
assumed to have made a determination that using FFP financing provides
a benefit, such that the FFP's long-term, fixed rate financing provides
only a positive economic impact. Importantly, the FFP does not regulate
or manage the affairs of its borrowers, and the regulations impose no
additional compliance, operating or other fees or costs on small
entities other than a financing relationship would require.
As a result of this certification, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 253
Aquaculture, Community development groups, Direct lending,
Financial assistance, Fisheries, Fishing, Individual fishing quota,
harvesting rights (privileges).
Dated: October 25, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend
50 CFR part 253, subpart B, as follows:
PART 253--FISHERIES ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Subpart B--Fisheries Finance Program
0
1. The authority citation for part 253 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53701 and 16 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.
0
2. Section 253.31 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 253.31 Harvesting rights loans.
(a) Specific definitions. For the purposes of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(1) Harvesting right(s) means any privilege to harvest fish in a
fishery that is federally managed under a limited access system.
(2) Limited access system has the same meaning given to that term
in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802).
(3) [Reserved]
(b) Loan Requirements and Limitations. These loan requirements and
limitations apply to individuals or entities who seek to finance or
refinance the acquisition of harvesting rights.
(1) The borrower must meet all regulatory and statutory
requirements to hold the harvesting rights at the time any such loan or
refinancing loan would close.
(2) NMFS will accept and consider the input of a Regional Fishery
Management Council at any time regarding the availability of loans in a
fishery under the Council's authority.
[[Page 50366]]
(i) The Council may submit an explanation to NMFS, in writing, as
to why the availability of financing for harvesting rights in a fishery
would harm the achievement of the goals and objectives of the Fishery
Management Plan applicable to the fishery. If NMFS accepts the
Council's reasoning, harvesting rights loans will not be provided, or
will cease to be provided, in that fishery.
(ii) If NMFS determines that harvesting rights loans will not be
provided in a fishery, NMFS will publish a notice in the Federal
Register notifying the public that new loans will not be made in that
fishery.
(iii) In such a scenario, pending applications will be returned and
loan fees returned as exceptional circumstances justify the action.
(3) The harvesting rights to be financed must be issued in a manner
in which they can be individually identified such that a valid and
specific security interest can be recorded. This determination shall be
solely made by the Program.
(c) Refinancing. (1) The Program may refinance any existing debts
associated with harvesting rights a borrower currently holds, provided
that:
(i) The harvesting rights being refinanced would have been eligible
for Program financing at the time the borrower purchased them, if
Program financing had been available,
(ii) The borrower meets all other applicable lending requirements,
and
(iii) The refinancing is in an amount up to 80 percent of the
harvesting rights' current market value, as determined at the sole
discretion of the Program, and subject to the limitation that the
Program will not disburse any amount that exceeds the outstanding
principal balance, plus accrued interest (if any), of the existing
harvesting rights' debt being refinanced or its fair market value,
whichever is less.
(2) In the event that the current market value of harvesting rights
and principal loan balance do not meet the 80 percent requirement in
paragraph (1)(iii) of this section, borrowers seeking refinancing may
be required to provide additional down payment.
(d) Maturity. Loan maturity may not exceed 25 years, but may be
shorter depending on credit and other considerations.
(e) Repayment. Repayment will be by equal quarterly installments of
principal and interest.
(f) Security. Although harvesting right(s) will be the primary
collateral for a loan, the Program may require additional security
pledges to maintain the priority of the Program's security interest.
The Program, at its option, may also require all parties with
significant ownership interests to personally guarantee loan repayment
for any borrower that is a corporation, partnership, or other entity,
including collateral to secure the guarantees. Some projects may
require additional security, collateral, or credit enhancement as
determined, in the sole discretion, by the Program.
(g) Program credit standards. Harvesting rights loans, regardless
of purpose, are subject to all Program general credit standards and
requirements. Collateral, guarantee and other requirements may be
adjusted to individual credit risks.
[FR Doc. 2017-23570 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P