Annual Stress Test-Technical and Conforming Changes, 49764-49767 [2017-23353]
Download as PDF
49764
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 207
Friday, October 27, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 46
[Docket ID. OCC–2017–0021]
RIN 1557–AD85
Annual Stress Test—Technical and
Conforming Changes
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC) is inviting
comment on a proposed rule that would
make several revisions to its stress
testing rule. The proposed rule would
change the range of possible ‘‘as-of’’
dates used in the global market shock
component to conform to changes
recently made by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board) to its stress testing
regulations. The proposed rule would
also change the transition process for
covered institutions with $50 billion or
more in assets. Under the proposed rule,
a covered institution that becomes an
over $50 billion covered institution, as
that term is defined in the OCC stress
testing regulation, before September 30
would become subject to the
requirements applicable to an over $50
billion covered institution beginning on
January 1 of the second calendar year
after the covered institution becomes an
over $50 billion covered institution, and
a covered institution that becomes an
over $50 billion covered institution after
September 30 would become subject to
the requirements applicable to an over
$50 billion covered institution
beginning on January 1 of the third
calendar year after the covered
institution becomes an over $50 billion
covered institution. The proposed rule
would also make certain technical
changes to clarify the requirements of
the OCC’s stress testing regulation.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 26, 2017.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
You may submit comments
to the OCC by any of the methods set
forth below. Because paper mail in the
Washington, DC area and at the OCC is
subject to delay, commenters are
encouraged to submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or email, if possible. Please use the title
‘‘Annual Stress Test—Technical and
Conforming Changes’’ to facilitate the
organization and distribution of the
comments. You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal—
‘‘Regulations.gov’’: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘Docket ID
OCC–2017–0021’’ in the Search Box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on ‘‘Comment
Now’’ to submit public comments.
• Click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab on the
Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for submitting
public comments.
• Email: regs.comments@
occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘Docket
ID OCC–2017–0021’’ in your comment.
In general, the OCC will enter all
comments received into the docket and
publish them on the Regulations.gov
Web site without change, including any
business or personal information that
you provide such as name and address
information, email addresses, or phone
numbers. Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
rulemaking action by any of the
following methods:
• Viewing Comments Electronically:
Go to www.regulations.gov. Enter
‘‘Docket ID OCC–2017–0021’’ in the
Search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ on the right side
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the screen. Comments and supporting
materials can be viewed and filtered by
clicking on ‘‘View all documents and
comments in this docket’’ and then
using the filtering tools on the left side
of the screen.
• Click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab on the
Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov.
The docket may be viewed after the
close of the comment period in the same
manner as during the comment period.
• Viewing Comments Personally: You
may personally inspect and photocopy
comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20219. For
security reasons, the OCC requires that
visitors make an appointment to inspect
comments. You may do so by calling
(202) 649–6700 or, for persons who are
deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202)
649–5597. Upon arrival, visitors will be
required to present valid governmentissued photo identification and submit
to security screening in order to inspect
and photocopy comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hein Bogaard, Lead Economic Expert,
International Analysis and Banking
Condition, (202) 649–5450; Andrew
Tschirhart, Financial Analyst, Large
Bank Supervision, (202) 649–6210; Kari
Falkenborg, Senior Financial Analyst,
Midsize and Community Bank
Supervision, (312) 917–5000; Henry
Barkhausen, Counsel, or Ron
Shimabukuro, Senior Counsel,
Legislative and Regulatory Activities
Division, (202) 649–5490; for persons
who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY,
(202) 649–5597.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act 1 (‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’) requires two
types of stress tests. Section 165(i)(1)
requires the Board to conduct annual
stress tests of holding companies with
$50 billion or more in assets
(‘‘supervisory stress tests’’). Section
165(i)(2) requires the federal banking
agencies to issue regulations requiring
financial companies with more than $10
billion in assets to conduct annual stress
tests themselves (‘‘company-run stress
tests’’). In October 2012, the OCC, the
Board, and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation issued final rules
1 Public
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
27OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
implementing the company-run stress
tests.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires that the
OCC and other federal primary financial
regulatory agencies issue consistent and
comparable regulations to implement
the statutory stress testing requirement.
In order to fulfill this requirement and
minimize regulatory burden, the OCC
has worked to ensure that its stress
testing regulation remains consistent
and comparable to the regulations
enacted by other regulatory agencies,
including the Board.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. New Range of Possible As-Of Dates
for Trading and Counterparty Scenario
Component
Under 12 CFR 46.5(c) the OCC may
require a covered institution with
significant trading activities to include
trading and counterparty components in
its adverse and severely adverse
scenarios. The trading and counterparty
position data to be used in this
component is as of a date between
January 1 and March 1 of a calendar
year. On February 3, 2017 the Board
issued a final rule that extended this
range to run from October 1 of the
calendar year preceding the year of the
stress test to March 1 of the calendar
year of the stress test.2 The proposed
rule would make the same change to the
OCC’s stress testing regulation.
Extending this range would increase the
OCC’s flexibility to choose an
appropriate as-of date. The OCC
continues to coordinate its stress testing
program with the Board in order to
minimize regulatory burden.
B. New Applicability Transition and
Terminology for Covered Institutions
With $50 Billion or More in Assets
The proposed rule would change the
term ‘‘over $50 billion covered
institution’’ to ‘‘$50 billion or over
covered institution.’’ The change would
not alter the scope of this defined term
and would not change the substantive
requirements of the regulation. The new
defined term would be a more precise
description of the entities included
within this category, which includes all
national banks and federal savings
associations ‘‘with average total
consolidated assets . . . that are not less
than $50 billion.’’ 3 While the proposed
rule would change the defined term
‘‘over $50 billion covered institution’’ to
‘‘$50 billion or over covered
institution,’’ this supplementary
information section will continue to use
the defined term ‘‘over $50 billion
2 82
3 12
FR 9308 (February 3, 2017).
CFR 46.2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
covered institution’’ since that is the
term used in the current regulatory text.
The proposed rule would also change
the transition process for covered
institutions that become an ‘‘over $50
billion covered institution.’’ On
February 3, 2017, the Board issued a
final rule that provides additional time
for bank holding companies that cross
the $50 billion asset threshold close to
the April 5 submission date.4 The
proposed rule would make a parallel
amendment to the OCC’s stress testing
regulation. Under the proposed rule, a
national bank or federal savings
association that becomes an over $50
billion covered institution in the fourth
quarter of a calendar year 5 would not be
subject to the stress testing requirements
applicable to over $50 billion covered
institutions until the third year after it
crosses the asset threshold. For
example, if a national bank or federal
savings association became an over $50
billion covered institution on September
15, 2017, the institution would be
expected to comply with the
requirements applicable to over $50
billion covered institutions beginning in
2019 and file the OCC DFAST–14A in
April 2019. If a national bank or federal
savings association became an over $50
billion covered institution on October
15, 2017, the institution would be
required to comply with the stress
testing requirements applicable to over
$50 billion covered institutions
beginning in 2020 and file the OCC
DFAST–14A in April 2020.
The stress testing timeline and
transition process for national banks or
federal savings associations which
become $10 to $50 billion covered
institutions remains unchanged. A
national bank or federal savings
association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution on or before
March 31 of a given year would be
required to conduct its first stress test in
the next calendar year. For example, a
national bank or federal savings
association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution as of March
31, 2017 would be required to conduct
its first stress test in the stress testing
cycle beginning January 1, 2018. A
national bank or federal savings
association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution after March
31 of a given year would be required to
conduct its first stress test in the second
calendar year after the date the national
4 82
FR 9308 (February 3, 2017).
institution becomes an over $50 billion
covered institution when its average total
consolidated assets, as reported on the covered
institution’s Call Reports, for the four most recent
consecutive quarters, equals $50 billion or more. 12
CFR 46.3(a).
5 An
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49765
bank or federal savings association
becomes a covered institution. For
example, a national bank or federal
savings association that becomes a $10
to $50 billion covered institution on
June 30, 2017 would be required to
conduct its first stress test in the stress
testing cycle beginning January 1, 2019.
C. Remove Obsolete Transition
Language
In 2014 the OCC, in coordination with
the Board and Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, shifted the dates
of the annual stress testing cycle by
approximately three months.6 The
OCC’s stress testing regulation
continues to include transition language
to facilitate this schedule shift. The
transition to the new schedule is now
complete, and the proposed rule would
remove this obsolete transition
language.
III. Request for Comment
The OCC requests comment on all
aspects of the proposal.
IV. Regulatory Analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the OCC
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, an
information collection unless the
information collection displays a valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This notice of
proposed rulemaking amends 12 CFR
part 46, which has an approved
information collection under the PRA
(OMB Control No. 1557–0319). The
amendments proposed today do not
introduce any new collections of
information, nor do they amend 12 CFR
part 46 in a way that modifies the
collection of information that OMB has
approved. Therefore, this proposal does
not require a PRA submission to OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires generally
that, in connection with a notice of
proposed rulemaking, an agency prepare
and make available for public comment
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the impact of a proposed
rule on small entities. However, the
regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise
required under the RFA is not required
if an agency certifies that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
(defined in regulations promulgated by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) to include banking organizations
6 79
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
FR 71630 (December 3, 2014).
27OCP1
49766
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
with total assets of less than or equal to
$500 million) and publishes its
certification and a brief explanatory
statement in the Federal Register
together with the rule.
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION above, the proposed
changes will only affect institutions
with more than $10 billion in total
assets. Therefore, the rule will not affect
any small entities. As such, pursuant to
section 605(b) of the RFA, the OCC
certifies that this proposal would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because no small national banks or
federal savings associations would be
affected by the proposal. Accordingly,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The OCC has analyzed the proposed
rule under the factors in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532). Under this analysis, the
OCC considered whether the proposed
rule includes a federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation). The
OCC has determined that this proposed
rule will not result in expenditures by
state, local, and tribal governments, or
the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. Accordingly, this
proposal is not subject to section 202 of
the UMRA.
Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Riegle Community Development
and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (RCDRIA) requires that each
federal banking agency, in determining
the effective date and administrative
compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other
requirements on insured depository
institutions, consider, consistent with
principles of safety and soundness and
the public interest, any administrative
burdens that such regulations would
place on depository institutions,
including small depository institutions,
and customers of depository
institutions, as well as the benefits of
such regulations. In addition, new
regulations and amendments to
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosures, or other new
requirements on insured depository
institutions generally must take effect
on the first day of a calendar quarter
that begins on or after the date on which
the regulations are published in final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
form.7 The proposed rule would not
impose additional reporting, disclosure,
or other requirements; therefore the
requirements of the RCDRIA do not
apply.
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act requires the federal banking
agencies to use plain language in all
proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. The OCC has sought to
present the proposed rule in a simple
and straightforward manner, and invites
comment on the use of plain language.
For example:
• Has the OCC organized the material
to suit your needs? If not, how could the
OCC present the proposed rule more
clearly?
• Are the requirements in the
proposed rule clearly stated? If not, how
could the proposed rule be more clearly
stated?
• Do the regulations contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear? If
so, which language requires
clarification?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the regulation
easier to understand? If so, what
changes would achieve that?
• Is this section format adequate? If
not, which of the sections should be
changed and how?
• What other changes can the OCC
incorporate to make the regulation
easier to understand?
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 46
Banking, Banks, Capital, Disclosures,
National banks, Recordkeeping, Risk,
Savings associations, Stress test.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the OCC proposes to amend
12 CFR part 46 as follows:
PART 46—ANNUAL STRESS TEST
1. The authority citation for part 46
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a; 1463(a)(2);
5365(i)(2); and 5412(b)(2)(B).
PART 46—[Amended]
2. Remove the phrase ‘‘over $50
billion covered institution’’ and add the
phrase ‘‘$50 billion or over covered
institution’’ in its place wherever it
appears.
■ 3. Section 46.2 is amended by
removing the definition of ‘‘over $50
billion covered institution’’ and adding
■
7 12
PO 00000
U.S.C. 4802.
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the definition for ‘‘$50 billion or over
covered institution’’ in its place:
§ 46.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
$50 billion or over covered institution
means a national bank or Federal
savings association with average total
consolidated assets, calculated as
required under this part, that are not
less than $50 billion.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 46.3 is amended by:
■ a. Removing paragraph (b);
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (c)
through (e) as paragraphs (b) through
(d), respectively; and
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (b) and (c).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 46.3
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Covered institutions that become
subject to stress testing requirements. A
national bank or Federal savings
association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution on or before
March 31 of a given year shall conduct
its first annual stress test under this part
in the next calendar year after the date
the national bank or Federal savings
association becomes a $10 to $50 billion
covered institution, unless that time is
extended by the OCC in writing. A
national bank or Federal savings
association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution after March
31 of a given year shall conduct its first
annual stress test under this part in the
second calendar year after the calendar
year in which the national bank or
Federal savings association becomes a
$10 to $50 billion covered institution,
unless that time is extended by the OCC
in writing.
(c) Ceasing to be a covered institution
or changing categories. (1) A covered
institution shall remain subject to the
stress test requirements based on its
applicable category, as defined in § 46.2,
unless and until total consolidated
assets of the covered institution falls
below the relevant size threshold for
each of four consecutive quarters as
reported by the covered institution’s
most recent Call Reports. The
calculation shall be effective on the ‘‘as
of’’ date of the fourth consecutive Call
Report.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, a national bank or
Federal savings association that
becomes a $50 billion or over covered
institution, whether by migrating from
being a $10 to $50 billion covered
institution or by directly becoming a
$50 billion or over covered institution,
after September 30 of a calendar year
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
must comply with the requirements
applicable to a $50 billion or over
covered institution beginning on
January 1 of the third calendar year after
the national bank or Federal savings
association becomes a $50 billion or
over covered institution, unless that
time is extended by the OCC in writing.
A national bank or Federal savings
association that becomes a $50 billion or
over covered institution on or before
September 30 of a calendar year must
comply with the requirements
applicable to a $50 billion or over
covered institution beginning on
January 1 of the second calendar year
after the national bank or Federal
savings association becomes a $50
billion or over covered institution,
unless that time is extended by the OCC
in writing.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise § 46.5 to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 46.5
Annual stress test.
Each covered institution must
conduct the annual stress test under this
part subject to the following
requirements:
(a) Financial data. A covered
institution must use financial data as of
December 31 of the previous calendar
year.
(b) Scenarios provided by the OCC. In
conducting the stress test under this
part, each covered institution must use
the scenarios provided by the OCC. The
scenarios provided by the OCC will
reflect a minimum of three sets of
economic and financial conditions,
including baseline, adverse, and
severely adverse scenarios. The OCC
will provide a description of the
scenarios required to be used by each
covered institution no later than
February 15 of that calendar year.
(c) Significant trading activities. The
OCC may require a covered institution
with significant trading activities, as
determined by the OCC, to include
trading and counterparty components in
its adverse and severely adverse
scenarios. The trading and counterparty
position data to be used in this
component will be as of a date between
October 1 of the previous calendar year
and March 1 of that calendar year in
which the stress test is performed, and
the OCC will communicate a
description of the component to the
covered institution no later than March
1 of that calendar year.
(d) Use of stress test results. The board
of directors and senior management of
each covered institution must consider
the results of the stress tests conducted
under this section in the normal course
of business, including but not limited to
the covered institution’s capital
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
planning, assessment of capital
adequacy, and risk management
practices.
■ 6. Section 46.7 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
§ 46.7 Reports to the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency and the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
(a) $10 to $50 billion covered
institution. A $10 to $50 billion covered
institution must report to the OCC and
to the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, on or before July 31,
the results of the stress test in the
manner and form specified by the OCC.
(b) $50 billion or over covered
institution. A $50 billion or over
covered institution must report to the
OCC and to the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System, on or before
April 5, the results of the stress test in
the manner and form specified by the
OCC.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Section 46.8 is amended by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 46.8
Publication of disclosures.
(a) Publication date. (1) $50 billion or
over covered institution. A $50 billion
or over covered institution must publish
a summary of the results of its annual
stress test in the period starting June 15
and ending July 15 provided:
(i) Unless the OCC determines
otherwise, if the $50 billion or over
covered institution is a consolidated
subsidiary of a bank holding company
or savings and loan holding company
subject to supervisory stress tests
conducted by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System pursuant to
12 CFR part 252, then within the June
15 to July 15 period such covered
institution may not publish the required
summary of its annual stress test earlier
than the date that the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System publishes the supervisory stress
test results of the covered bank’s parent
holding company.
(ii) If the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System publishes the
supervisory stress test results of the
covered institution’s parent holding
company prior to June 15, then such
covered institution may publish its
stress test results prior to June 15, but
no later than July 15, through actual
publication by the covered institution or
through publication by the parent
holding company pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section.
(2) $10 to $50 billion covered
institution. A $10 to $50 billion covered
institution must publish a summary of
the results of its annual stress test in the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49767
period starting October 15 and ending
October 31.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 19, 2017.
Keith A. Noreika,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2017–23353 Filed 10–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2017–0043]
16 CFR Part 1112
CPSC Acceptance of Third Party
Laboratories: Revision to the Notice of
Requirements for Prohibitions of
Children’s Toys and Child Care
Articles Containing Specified
Phthalates
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) would update the
existing notice of requirements (NOR)
for prohibitions of children’s toys and
child care articles containing specified
phthalates that provide the criteria and
process for Commission acceptance of
accreditation pursuant to the Consumer
Product Safety Act (CPSA). The
proposed NOR would revise the current
NOR to be consistent with the final
phthalates rule, which is published
elsewhere in this same issue of the
Federal Register and will be codified in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
DATES: Submit comments by January 10,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2017–
0043, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through
www.regulations.gov. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49764-49767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23353]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 49764]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 46
[Docket ID. OCC-2017-0021]
RIN 1557-AD85
Annual Stress Test--Technical and Conforming Changes
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is
inviting comment on a proposed rule that would make several revisions
to its stress testing rule. The proposed rule would change the range of
possible ``as-of'' dates used in the global market shock component to
conform to changes recently made by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) to its stress testing regulations. The
proposed rule would also change the transition process for covered
institutions with $50 billion or more in assets. Under the proposed
rule, a covered institution that becomes an over $50 billion covered
institution, as that term is defined in the OCC stress testing
regulation, before September 30 would become subject to the
requirements applicable to an over $50 billion covered institution
beginning on January 1 of the second calendar year after the covered
institution becomes an over $50 billion covered institution, and a
covered institution that becomes an over $50 billion covered
institution after September 30 would become subject to the requirements
applicable to an over $50 billion covered institution beginning on
January 1 of the third calendar year after the covered institution
becomes an over $50 billion covered institution. The proposed rule
would also make certain technical changes to clarify the requirements
of the OCC's stress testing regulation.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the OCC by any of the methods set
forth below. Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the
OCC is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible. Please
use the title ``Annual Stress Test--Technical and Conforming Changes''
to facilitate the organization and distribution of the comments. You
may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal--``Regulations.gov'': Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2017-0021'' in the Search
Box and click ``Search.'' Click on ``Comment Now'' to submit public
comments.
Click on the ``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page
to get information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
submitting public comments.
Email: [email protected].
Mail: Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW., Suite
3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW., Suite 3E-218,
Washington, DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465-4326.
Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and
``Docket ID OCC-2017-0021'' in your comment. In general, the OCC will
enter all comments received into the docket and publish them on the
Regulations.gov Web site without change, including any business or
personal information that you provide such as name and address
information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received,
including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the
public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any
information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to
this rulemaking action by any of the following methods:
Viewing Comments Electronically: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2017-0021'' in the Search
box and click ``Search.'' Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the right
side of the screen. Comments and supporting materials can be viewed and
filtered by clicking on ``View all documents and comments in this
docket'' and then using the filtering tools on the left side of the
screen.
Click on the ``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page
to get information on using Regulations.gov. The docket may be viewed
after the close of the comment period in the same manner as during the
comment period.
Viewing Comments Personally: You may personally inspect
and photocopy comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC
20219. For security reasons, the OCC requires that visitors make an
appointment to inspect comments. You may do so by calling (202) 649-
6700 or, for persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-
5597. Upon arrival, visitors will be required to present valid
government-issued photo identification and submit to security screening
in order to inspect and photocopy comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hein Bogaard, Lead Economic Expert,
International Analysis and Banking Condition, (202) 649-5450; Andrew
Tschirhart, Financial Analyst, Large Bank Supervision, (202) 649-6210;
Kari Falkenborg, Senior Financial Analyst, Midsize and Community Bank
Supervision, (312) 917-5000; Henry Barkhausen, Counsel, or Ron
Shimabukuro, Senior Counsel, Legislative and Regulatory Activities
Division, (202) 649-5490; for persons who are deaf or hearing impaired,
TTY, (202) 649-5597.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act \1\ (``Dodd-Frank Act'') requires two types of stress
tests. Section 165(i)(1) requires the Board to conduct annual stress
tests of holding companies with $50 billion or more in assets
(``supervisory stress tests''). Section 165(i)(2) requires the federal
banking agencies to issue regulations requiring financial companies
with more than $10 billion in assets to conduct annual stress tests
themselves (``company-run stress tests''). In October 2012, the OCC,
the Board, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued final
rules
[[Page 49765]]
implementing the company-run stress tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dodd-Frank Act requires that the OCC and other federal primary
financial regulatory agencies issue consistent and comparable
regulations to implement the statutory stress testing requirement. In
order to fulfill this requirement and minimize regulatory burden, the
OCC has worked to ensure that its stress testing regulation remains
consistent and comparable to the regulations enacted by other
regulatory agencies, including the Board.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
A. New Range of Possible As-Of Dates for Trading and Counterparty
Scenario Component
Under 12 CFR 46.5(c) the OCC may require a covered institution with
significant trading activities to include trading and counterparty
components in its adverse and severely adverse scenarios. The trading
and counterparty position data to be used in this component is as of a
date between January 1 and March 1 of a calendar year. On February 3,
2017 the Board issued a final rule that extended this range to run from
October 1 of the calendar year preceding the year of the stress test to
March 1 of the calendar year of the stress test.\2\ The proposed rule
would make the same change to the OCC's stress testing regulation.
Extending this range would increase the OCC's flexibility to choose an
appropriate as-of date. The OCC continues to coordinate its stress
testing program with the Board in order to minimize regulatory burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 82 FR 9308 (February 3, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. New Applicability Transition and Terminology for Covered
Institutions With $50 Billion or More in Assets
The proposed rule would change the term ``over $50 billion covered
institution'' to ``$50 billion or over covered institution.'' The
change would not alter the scope of this defined term and would not
change the substantive requirements of the regulation. The new defined
term would be a more precise description of the entities included
within this category, which includes all national banks and federal
savings associations ``with average total consolidated assets . . .
that are not less than $50 billion.'' \3\ While the proposed rule would
change the defined term ``over $50 billion covered institution'' to
``$50 billion or over covered institution,'' this supplementary
information section will continue to use the defined term ``over $50
billion covered institution'' since that is the term used in the
current regulatory text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 12 CFR 46.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule would also change the transition process for
covered institutions that become an ``over $50 billion covered
institution.'' On February 3, 2017, the Board issued a final rule that
provides additional time for bank holding companies that cross the $50
billion asset threshold close to the April 5 submission date.\4\ The
proposed rule would make a parallel amendment to the OCC's stress
testing regulation. Under the proposed rule, a national bank or federal
savings association that becomes an over $50 billion covered
institution in the fourth quarter of a calendar year \5\ would not be
subject to the stress testing requirements applicable to over $50
billion covered institutions until the third year after it crosses the
asset threshold. For example, if a national bank or federal savings
association became an over $50 billion covered institution on September
15, 2017, the institution would be expected to comply with the
requirements applicable to over $50 billion covered institutions
beginning in 2019 and file the OCC DFAST-14A in April 2019. If a
national bank or federal savings association became an over $50 billion
covered institution on October 15, 2017, the institution would be
required to comply with the stress testing requirements applicable to
over $50 billion covered institutions beginning in 2020 and file the
OCC DFAST-14A in April 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 82 FR 9308 (February 3, 2017).
\5\ An institution becomes an over $50 billion covered
institution when its average total consolidated assets, as reported
on the covered institution's Call Reports, for the four most recent
consecutive quarters, equals $50 billion or more. 12 CFR 46.3(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The stress testing timeline and transition process for national
banks or federal savings associations which become $10 to $50 billion
covered institutions remains unchanged. A national bank or federal
savings association that becomes a $10 to $50 billion covered
institution on or before March 31 of a given year would be required to
conduct its first stress test in the next calendar year. For example, a
national bank or federal savings association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution as of March 31, 2017 would be required to
conduct its first stress test in the stress testing cycle beginning
January 1, 2018. A national bank or federal savings association that
becomes a $10 to $50 billion covered institution after March 31 of a
given year would be required to conduct its first stress test in the
second calendar year after the date the national bank or federal
savings association becomes a covered institution. For example, a
national bank or federal savings association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution on June 30, 2017 would be required to
conduct its first stress test in the stress testing cycle beginning
January 1, 2019.
C. Remove Obsolete Transition Language
In 2014 the OCC, in coordination with the Board and Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, shifted the dates of the annual stress testing
cycle by approximately three months.\6\ The OCC's stress testing
regulation continues to include transition language to facilitate this
schedule shift. The transition to the new schedule is now complete, and
the proposed rule would remove this obsolete transition language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 79 FR 71630 (December 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Request for Comment
The OCC requests comment on all aspects of the proposal.
IV. Regulatory Analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the
OCC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless the information collection
displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
This notice of proposed rulemaking amends 12 CFR part 46, which has an
approved information collection under the PRA (OMB Control No. 1557-
0319). The amendments proposed today do not introduce any new
collections of information, nor do they amend 12 CFR part 46 in a way
that modifies the collection of information that OMB has approved.
Therefore, this proposal does not require a PRA submission to OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires generally that, in connection with a notice of proposed
rulemaking, an agency prepare and make available for public comment an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the impact of a
proposed rule on small entities. However, the regulatory flexibility
analysis otherwise required under the RFA is not required if an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities (defined in regulations
promulgated by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to include
banking organizations
[[Page 49766]]
with total assets of less than or equal to $500 million) and publishes
its certification and a brief explanatory statement in the Federal
Register together with the rule.
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION above, the proposed
changes will only affect institutions with more than $10 billion in
total assets. Therefore, the rule will not affect any small entities.
As such, pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA, the OCC certifies that
this proposal would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because no small national banks or
federal savings associations would be affected by the proposal.
Accordingly, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The OCC has analyzed the proposed rule under the factors in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532). Under this
analysis, the OCC considered whether the proposed rule includes a
federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). The
OCC has determined that this proposed rule will not result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, or the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Accordingly, this
proposal is not subject to section 202 of the UMRA.
Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (RCDRIA) requires that each federal banking agency, in determining
the effective date and administrative compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other
requirements on insured depository institutions, consider, consistent
with principles of safety and soundness and the public interest, any
administrative burdens that such regulations would place on depository
institutions, including small depository institutions, and customers of
depository institutions, as well as the benefits of such regulations.
In addition, new regulations and amendments to regulations that impose
additional reporting, disclosures, or other new requirements on insured
depository institutions generally must take effect on the first day of
a calendar quarter that begins on or after the date on which the
regulations are published in final form.\7\ The proposed rule would not
impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other requirements;
therefore the requirements of the RCDRIA do not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 12 U.S.C. 4802.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires the federal
banking agencies to use plain language in all proposed and final rules
published after January 1, 2000. The OCC has sought to present the
proposed rule in a simple and straightforward manner, and invites
comment on the use of plain language. For example:
Has the OCC organized the material to suit your needs? If
not, how could the OCC present the proposed rule more clearly?
Are the requirements in the proposed rule clearly stated?
If not, how could the proposed rule be more clearly stated?
Do the regulations contain technical language or jargon
that is not clear? If so, which language requires clarification?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the regulation easier to
understand? If so, what changes would achieve that?
Is this section format adequate? If not, which of the
sections should be changed and how?
What other changes can the OCC incorporate to make the
regulation easier to understand?
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 46
Banking, Banks, Capital, Disclosures, National banks,
Recordkeeping, Risk, Savings associations, Stress test.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the OCC proposes to
amend 12 CFR part 46 as follows:
PART 46--ANNUAL STRESS TEST
0
1. The authority citation for part 46 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a; 1463(a)(2); 5365(i)(2); and
5412(b)(2)(B).
PART 46--[Amended]
0
2. Remove the phrase ``over $50 billion covered institution'' and add
the phrase ``$50 billion or over covered institution'' in its place
wherever it appears.
0
3. Section 46.2 is amended by removing the definition of ``over $50
billion covered institution'' and adding the definition for ``$50
billion or over covered institution'' in its place:
Sec. 46.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
$50 billion or over covered institution means a national bank or
Federal savings association with average total consolidated assets,
calculated as required under this part, that are not less than $50
billion.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 46.3 is amended by:
0
a. Removing paragraph (b);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (c) through (e) as paragraphs (b) through
(d), respectively; and
0
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraphs (b) and (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 46.3 Applicability.
* * * * *
(b) Covered institutions that become subject to stress testing
requirements. A national bank or Federal savings association that
becomes a $10 to $50 billion covered institution on or before March 31
of a given year shall conduct its first annual stress test under this
part in the next calendar year after the date the national bank or
Federal savings association becomes a $10 to $50 billion covered
institution, unless that time is extended by the OCC in writing. A
national bank or Federal savings association that becomes a $10 to $50
billion covered institution after March 31 of a given year shall
conduct its first annual stress test under this part in the second
calendar year after the calendar year in which the national bank or
Federal savings association becomes a $10 to $50 billion covered
institution, unless that time is extended by the OCC in writing.
(c) Ceasing to be a covered institution or changing categories. (1)
A covered institution shall remain subject to the stress test
requirements based on its applicable category, as defined in Sec.
46.2, unless and until total consolidated assets of the covered
institution falls below the relevant size threshold for each of four
consecutive quarters as reported by the covered institution's most
recent Call Reports. The calculation shall be effective on the ``as
of'' date of the fourth consecutive Call Report.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a national
bank or Federal savings association that becomes a $50 billion or over
covered institution, whether by migrating from being a $10 to $50
billion covered institution or by directly becoming a $50 billion or
over covered institution, after September 30 of a calendar year
[[Page 49767]]
must comply with the requirements applicable to a $50 billion or over
covered institution beginning on January 1 of the third calendar year
after the national bank or Federal savings association becomes a $50
billion or over covered institution, unless that time is extended by
the OCC in writing. A national bank or Federal savings association that
becomes a $50 billion or over covered institution on or before
September 30 of a calendar year must comply with the requirements
applicable to a $50 billion or over covered institution beginning on
January 1 of the second calendar year after the national bank or
Federal savings association becomes a $50 billion or over covered
institution, unless that time is extended by the OCC in writing.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 46.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 46.5 Annual stress test.
Each covered institution must conduct the annual stress test under
this part subject to the following requirements:
(a) Financial data. A covered institution must use financial data
as of December 31 of the previous calendar year.
(b) Scenarios provided by the OCC. In conducting the stress test
under this part, each covered institution must use the scenarios
provided by the OCC. The scenarios provided by the OCC will reflect a
minimum of three sets of economic and financial conditions, including
baseline, adverse, and severely adverse scenarios. The OCC will provide
a description of the scenarios required to be used by each covered
institution no later than February 15 of that calendar year.
(c) Significant trading activities. The OCC may require a covered
institution with significant trading activities, as determined by the
OCC, to include trading and counterparty components in its adverse and
severely adverse scenarios. The trading and counterparty position data
to be used in this component will be as of a date between October 1 of
the previous calendar year and March 1 of that calendar year in which
the stress test is performed, and the OCC will communicate a
description of the component to the covered institution no later than
March 1 of that calendar year.
(d) Use of stress test results. The board of directors and senior
management of each covered institution must consider the results of the
stress tests conducted under this section in the normal course of
business, including but not limited to the covered institution's
capital planning, assessment of capital adequacy, and risk management
practices.
0
6. Section 46.7 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:
Sec. 46.7 Reports to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
(a) $10 to $50 billion covered institution. A $10 to $50 billion
covered institution must report to the OCC and to the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, on or before July 31, the
results of the stress test in the manner and form specified by the OCC.
(b) $50 billion or over covered institution. A $50 billion or over
covered institution must report to the OCC and to the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, on or before April 5, the
results of the stress test in the manner and form specified by the OCC.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 46.8 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 46.8 Publication of disclosures.
(a) Publication date. (1) $50 billion or over covered institution.
A $50 billion or over covered institution must publish a summary of the
results of its annual stress test in the period starting June 15 and
ending July 15 provided:
(i) Unless the OCC determines otherwise, if the $50 billion or over
covered institution is a consolidated subsidiary of a bank holding
company or savings and loan holding company subject to supervisory
stress tests conducted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System pursuant to 12 CFR part 252, then within the June 15 to July 15
period such covered institution may not publish the required summary of
its annual stress test earlier than the date that the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System publishes the supervisory
stress test results of the covered bank's parent holding company.
(ii) If the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
publishes the supervisory stress test results of the covered
institution's parent holding company prior to June 15, then such
covered institution may publish its stress test results prior to June
15, but no later than July 15, through actual publication by the
covered institution or through publication by the parent holding
company pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) $10 to $50 billion covered institution. A $10 to $50 billion
covered institution must publish a summary of the results of its annual
stress test in the period starting October 15 and ending October 31.
* * * * *
Dated: October 19, 2017.
Keith A. Noreika,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2017-23353 Filed 10-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P