Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Charter/Headboat Permit Commercial Sale Provision, 49773-49780 [2017-23277]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(e)(2) and will be subject to the ELD
requirements when compliance
becomes mandatory. Each time a
production driver operates a CMV for a
different studio or production company
the motor carrier and the driver must
reconcile the driver’s HOS record for the
past week. At present, cooperation
between production companies, various
Teamsters locals, and drivers can reduce
the burden of this detailed
reconciliation. And under the current
rules, drivers themselves can manage
the necessary paper RODS, carry them
to each new CMV, and transfer paper
copies to each new motor carrier as
needed. When a roadside inspection
occurs, a driver can produce paper
RODS for review by the enforcement
official.
MPAA contends that the lack of
interoperability among ELD platforms
developed by various manufacturers
means that motion picture company
drivers will not be able to transfer HOS
data from one carrier or vehicle to other
carriers or vehicles. A driver who is
required to use an ELD may operate a
CMV that has one operating system
installed on the truck. When the driver
transfers to operating for another studio
or production company, that company
may use a different ELD operating
system for its vehicles. The HOS data
cannot automatically be transferred
from the first company’s vehicle to the
second company’s system unless both
ELD devices are on the same platform.
MPAA believes that requiring
production company drivers to record
their HOS using incompatible ELD
platforms would prevent them from
implementing more efficient or effective
operations that would maintain a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level achieved without the requested
exemption. Allowing production
company drivers to continue using
paper RODS to record their HOS data
will not jeopardize operational safety or
increase fatigue-related crashes.
MPAA states that Congress and
FMCSA already recognized the minimal
safety concerns presented by motion
picture production drivers due to the
limited numbers of hours and miles
they operate CMVs and the availability
of frequent and extended periods of off
duty time throughout the workday. As
a result production drivers are already
exempted from the typical HOS driving
and on duty time limits as long as they
operate within a 100 air-mile radius of
the location where the driver reports to
and is released from work.
Because production drivers operate
CMVs so few miles and hours per day,
motion picture production companies
have driver and vehicle out-of-service
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
rates that are substantially below the
national averages for carriers in general.
Until such time as all ELD platforms are
fully interoperable, motion picture
production drivers should be allowed to
continue recording their HOS data using
paper RODS.
A copy of MPAA’s application for
exemption is available for review in the
docket for this notice.
Issued on: October 23, 2017.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–23404 Filed 10–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 170901859–7999–01]
RIN 0648–BH19
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Charter/Headboat Permit Commercial
Sale Provision
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
make HMS Charter/Headboat permits a
non-commercial category and create a
separate regulatory provision for the
commercial sale of Atlantic highly
migratory species (HMS) by HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders.
Currently, all vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit could be
categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel and subject to United States Coast
Guard (USCG) commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements if they also
possess a state commercial sale permit,
regardless of whether the permit holder
engages or intends to engage in
commercial fishing. Under the proposed
rule, HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would be prohibited from
selling Atlantic tunas or swordfish
unless they obtain a ‘‘commercial sale’’
endorsement for their permit. This
proposed rule would clarify which HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels are
properly categorized as commercial
fishing vessels. This action would be
administrative in nature and would not
affect fishing practices or result in any
significant environmental or economic
impacts.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49773
This proposed rule has a 15-day
comment period. The abbreviated
comment period is necessary to
implement any management changes
before January 1, 2018 to ensure all
HMS charter/headboat vessels are
appropriately categorized as commercial
or non-commercial upon initial
application or renewal of 2018 HMS
Charter/Headboat permits. We do not
anticipate the proposal to be
controversial or to generate significant
public comment and believe that a 15day comment period will be sufficient
to attract any substantive public input.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by November 13, 2017. An
operator-assisted, public conference call
and webinar will be held on November
1, 2017, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
EST.
ADDRESSES: The conference call
information is phone number 1 (888)
664–9965; participant passcode
5355311. Participants are strongly
encouraged to log/dial in fifteen
minutes prior to the meeting. NMFS
will show a brief presentation via
webinar followed by an opportunity for
public comment. To join the webinar go
to: https://noaaevents2.webex.com/noaa
events2/onstage/g.php?MTID=efb2b4e
48c0c4b75f50900b90743b7a18, event
password: noaa. Participants that have
not used WebEx before will be
prompted to download and run a plugin program that will enable them to
view the webinar.
You may submit comments on this
document, identified by NOAA–NMFS–
2017–0124, by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170124, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Margo Schulze-Haugen, NMFS/SF1,
1315 East-West Highway, National
Marine Fisheries Service, SSMC3, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
49774
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
this proposed rule may be submitted to
the HMS Management Division by email
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or
fax to (202) 395–7285.
Presentation materials and copies of
the supporting documents—including
the 2006 Consolidated HMS Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) and its
amendments and associated
documents—are available from the HMS
Management Division Web site at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/ or by
contacting Dianne Stephan by phone at
978–281–9260.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dianne Stephan or Tobey Curtis by
phone at 978–281–9260, or Steve
Durkee by phone at 202–670–6637.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
Atlantic HMS regulations at 50 CFR
635.4(b) require that charter/headboat
vessels (i.e., vessels taking fee-paying
passengers) used to fish for, take, retain,
or possess Atlantic HMS, must obtain an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. In
addition to carrying paying passengers,
the permit also allows charter/headboat
fishermen to diversify their operations
by fishing commercially for Atlantic
tunas and swordfish. They may also sell
sharks if they have a commercial shark
permit in addition to the Charter/
Headboat permit. Relatively few permit
holders use the commercial sale
provision. From 2012–2016, an annual
average of only seven percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders sold
any tuna or swordfish.
Legislation and United States Coast
Guard (USCG) commercial fishing
vessel safety policies and regulatory
interpretation may result in an
increased compliance burden for HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels.
Commercial fishing vessel safety
provisions contained in the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2010 (CGAA) and
the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 were the
subject of a Marine Safety Information
Bulletin (MSIB 12–15) issued by the
USCG on October 20, 2015. MSIB 12–15
clarified that the law would require
mandatory dockside safety exams to a
broader population of commercial
fishing vessels. As clarified in the
notice, that broader community
included HMS Charter/Headboat vessels
that were authorized by the permit to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
sell fish commercially (e.g., all Charter/
Headboat vessels) who also possessed a
state commercial sale permit. The
mandatory safety exam includes a check
for required commercial fishing vessel
safety equipment such as life rafts,
emergency beacons, and survival suits,
and other requirements found in 46 CFR
part 28. Outfitting a vessel with these
items comes at a substantial cost.
Mandatory dockside safety exams for
vessels operating beyond three nautical
miles from the baseline under this
program began October 15, 2015.
The mandatory safety requirements
have been difficult to enforce pending a
more effective way to identify which
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
engage in commercial fishing and are
therefore subject to the requirements.
After receiving questions about
applicability from NMFS and the
regulated community, on July 10, 2017,
the USCG issued Marine Safety
Information Bulletin (MSIB 008–17) in
an attempt to clarify the applicability of
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements for vessels with HMS
permits, including HMS Charter/
Headboat permits. USCG regulations at
46 CFR 28.50 define a commercial
fishing vessel as a vessel that
commercially engages in the catching,
taking, or harvesting of fish, or an
activity that can reasonably be expected
to result in the catching, taking, or
harvesting of fish. According to the
MSIB 008–17, if an individual has an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit (which
allows commercial sale) and a state
permit to sell catch, the vessel is
considered subject to commercial
fishing vessel safety regulations.
Many HMS Charter/Headboat
operators that neither sell, nor intend to
sell, their catch but hold a permit to sell
have thus found that the USCG policy
identifies their operations as a
‘‘commercial fishing vessel,’’ and
requires them to adhere to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. For example, even small
charter vessels (i.e., less than 20 feet in
length) operating in the warm waters of
the Gulf of Mexico and with no intent
to sell HMS, may be required under the
USCG regulations to carry an inflatable
life raft that can cost approximately
$1,750. In addition to the cost burden,
a vessel of this size has minimal space
to store such gear. These smaller HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels
were previously subject to the USCG
safety regulations for uninspected
passenger vessels of less than 100 gross
tons and carrying six or less passengers,
which are less extensive and less costly.
In late 2016 and early 2017, NMFS
and the USCG staff informally discussed
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
how to more effectively categorize HMS
charter/headboat vessels under USCG
regulations. On October 6, 2017, the
USCG formally reviewed this proposed
rule and concurred with the approach to
provide clarity on the applicability on
their requirements. The HMS Advisory
Panel discussed this issue at length at
its May and September 2017 meetings.
Many HMS Advisory Panel members,
including commercial, recreational, and
council/state representatives, supported
creating a separate regulatory provision
for charter/headboat vessels that intend
to sell HMS and to thus specify that
other such vessels were not engaged in
commercial sale and not subject to
expensive USCG commercial vessel
compliance obligations. Panel members
stated that creating a separate sale
provision would support more
appropriate application and
enforcement of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements in the
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat fishery,
and would better clarify for permit
holders which USCG regulations apply
to their vessels and fishing operations.
Proposed Action
This rule proposes to create a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement on the
existing HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under the proposed rule, HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders would be
prohibited from selling any catch of
HMS unless they first obtain a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement on their
permit. Only those HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders with the
endorsement would be permitted to sell
Atlantic tunas or swordfish or sharks if
they also have the additionally required
commercial shark permit.
This proposed rule clarifies that any
HMS Charter/Headboat vessel that
selects this commercial sale
endorsement would be categorized as a
commercial fishing vessel under USCG
criteria, and therefore subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Those vessels issued an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit without
a ‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement
would not be categorized as a
commercial fishing vessel and would
not be subject to the USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements. HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders with
the commercial sale endorsement
selling a tuna or swordfish must adhere
to the applicable Atlantic Tunas General
Category or General Commercial
Swordfish permit possession limits and
restrictions, and the landings would be
applied against the appropriate
commercial quota. HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders that sell or
intend to sell sharks must also obtain
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
the commercial sale endorsement on
their permit as well as a commercial
shark permit. This proposed rule would
only change the permit category under
which certain vessels are fishing. It
would not affect quotas, gear types, or
time/area restrictions, and neither
increase or decrease fishing effort or
affect fishing timing nor implement
other measures that would potentially
have any environmental impacts or
effects.
Request for Comments
NMFS is requesting comments on the
alternatives and analyses described in
this proposed rule, Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analysis (IRFA) and
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR).
Comments may be submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov, mail, or fax.
Comments may also be submitted at a
public hearing (see Public Hearings and
Special Accommodations below). NMFS
solicits comments on this proposed rule
by November 13, 2017 (see DATES and
ADDRESSES).
Public Hearings
Comments on this proposed rule may
be submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov, mail, or fax and
comments may also be submitted at a
public hearing. During the comment
period, NMFS will hold one webinar
conference call for this proposed rule
(see ADDRESSES).
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Management and Conservation
(Magnuson-Stevens) Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that the proposed rule is consistent with
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act, and other applicable
law, subject to further consideration
after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) and which has been submitted to
OMB under control number (0648–
0327). Public reporting burden for HMS
Charter/Headboat permit applications
initial response is estimated to average
30 minutes and renewal by telephone or
web is estimated to average 6 minutes
per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate, or any
other aspect of this data collection,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and
by email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov,or fax to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
For the reasons described in the
preamble, this proposed rule is expected
to be deregulatory under Executive
Order 13771.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
This proposed rule has a 15-day
comment period. The abbreviated
comment period is necessary to
implement any management changes
before January 1, 2018 to ensure all
HMS charter/headboat vessels are
appropriately categorized as commercial
or non-commercial upon initial
application or renewal of 2018 HMS
Charter/Headboat permits. This will
avoid additional administrative burden
on the agency and the regulated
community that would result from a
later implementation date, which would
require those vessel owners needing the
commercial endorsement to engage in
an additional process. We do not
anticipate the proposal to be
controversial or to generate significant
public comment and believe that a 15day comment period will be sufficient
to attract any substantive public input.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA
describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on small entities. A copy of this analysis
is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). The following is a
summary of the IRFA.
Description of the Reasons Why Action
Is Being Considered
A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for
this action are contained in the
Background section of the preamble and
in the SUMMARY of this proposed rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Proposed
Rule Would Apply
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires
agencies to provide an estimate of the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49775
number of small entities to which the
rule would apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
for-hire charter/headboat businesses.
For-hire charter/headboat business fit
into the ‘‘Scenic and Sightseeing
Transportation, Water’’ industry under
NAICS code 487210. SBA has
established that the small entity size
standard for that industry is $7.5
million in average annual receipts.
Provision is made under SBA’s
regulations for an agency to develop its
own industry-specific size standards
after consultation with Advocacy and an
opportunity for public comment (see 13
CFR 121.903(c)). Under this provision,
NMFS may establish size standards that
differ from those established by the SBA
Office of Size Standards, but only for
use by NMFS and only for the purpose
of conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency’s
obligations under the RFA. To utilize
this provision, NMFS must publish such
size standards in the Federal Register
(FR), which NMFS did on December 29,
2015 (80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015).
In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small
business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses
in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance
purposes.
NMFS considers all HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders (3,594 as of
October 2016) to be small entities
because these vessels have reported
annual gross receipts of less than $11
million for commercial fishing or earn
less than $7.5 million from for-hire
fishing trips.
NMFS has determined that this
proposed rule would apply to the small
businesses associated with the
approximately seven percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that
also commercially fish for swordfish
and tuna. Based on the most recent
number of permit holders, NMFS
estimates that this proposed rule would
apply to approximately 252 HMS
Charter/Headboat vessel owners. NMFS
has determined that this action would
not likely directly affect any small
organizations or small government
jurisdictions defined under the RFA.
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
49776
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Record-Keeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Proposed Rule,
Including an Estimate of the Classes of
Small Entities Which Would Be Subject
to the Requirements of the Report or
Record
Section 603(b)(4) of the RFA requires
Agencies to describe any new reporting,
record-keeping and other compliance
requirements. This proposed rule would
create a ‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement
for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under the proposed rule, HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders would be
prohibited from selling any catch of
HMS unless they obtain a commercial
sale endorsement on their permit. The
commercial sale endorsement could be
added to the Charter/Headboat permit at
the time of the permit application or
renewal, or anytime thereafter. Only
Charter/Headboat permit holders with
the endorsement would be allowed to
sell HMS although they would not be
obligated to sell any HMS. There would
be no additional charge for the
commercial sale endorsement above the
cost of the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit; the endorsement would add less
than a minute more of labor effort to the
normal HMS Charter/Headboat permit
process. Those vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement would
be categorized as a commercial vessel
for the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirement.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Identification of All Relevant Federal
Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap, or
Conflict with the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule has been
determined not to duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any Federal rules. This
rule is being proposed to address
changes in USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety policies and regulatory
interpretation that would result in an
increased compliance burden for HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders due to
the Coast Guard’s broader definition of
commercial fishing vessels. This
proposed rule would clarify which HMS
charter/headboat vessels are truly
operating as commercial fishing vessels
versus those that neither sell, nor intend
to sell, their catch, which includes the
majority of charter/headboat vessels.
Description of Any Significant
Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of the
Applicable Statutes and That Minimize
Any Significant Economic Impact of the
Proposed Rule on Small Entities
NMFS considered four different
alternatives to separate the commercial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
sale provision from the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit, and thus relieve some
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
from the changes in USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements.
Alternative 1, the status quo/no action
alternative, would make no changes to
current HMS regulations. Alternative 2,
the preferred alternative, would create
an endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that allows commercial
sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
Alternative 3 would remove the
commercial sale provision of the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Alternative 4
would create two separate HMS Charter/
Headboat permits; one that allows
commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and
swordfish, and one that does not.
Under the ‘‘no action’’ Alternative 1,
NMFS would maintain the current
regulations regarding the Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Under current
regulations at 635.4(b), permit holders
taking fee-paying passengers to fish for
HMS (i.e. charter boats or headboats)
must obtain the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Since HMS Charter/Headboat
permits allow the commercial sale of
Atlantic tunas and swordfish, the
vessels would now be subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, regardless of whether the
permit holder intends to sell HMS.
However, without a change to the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit regulations,
USCG will consider all HMS charter/
headboat vessels as commercial fishing
vessels that must adhere to the to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat
permitted vessels were previously
subject to the USCG safety regulations
for uninspected passenger vessels of less
than 100 gross tons and carrying six or
less passengers, which are less extensive
and less costly.
Under the USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements, many
Atlantic HMS charter/headboats would
have to comply with four rule
requirements for survival craft, record
keeping, examinations and certificates
of compliance, and classing of vessels.
The survival craft requirement
establishes that all fishing industry
vessels operating beyond 3 nautical
miles must carry survival craft that will
meet a new performance standard for
primary lifesaving equipment. The use
of ‘‘lifeboats or liferafts’’ are required for
commercial vessels, whereas strictly forhire vessels are only required to a have
‘‘a survival craft that ensures that no
part of an individual is immersed in
water.’’ This means that lifefloats and
buoyant apparatus will no longer be
accepted as survival craft on any
commercial fishing vessel operating
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
beyond 3 nautical miles once the most
recent USCG guidance in fully enforced.
Some HMS Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels would incorrectly be identified
as commercial vessels, subject to the
more stringent lifeboat/liferaft
requirements. USCG estimates that the
maximum initial cost of this
requirement per vessel will be $1,740
and have a recurring annual cost of
$300. The records provision requires the
individual in charge of a vessel
operating beyond 3 nautical miles to
maintain a record of lifesaving and fire
equipment maintenance. It will be
incumbent upon the master/individual
in charge of the vessel to maintain these
records onboard. The USCG estimates
this record keeping requirement will
cost $18 annually per vessel.
The examinations and certificates of
compliance provision requires a
dockside safety examination at least
once every 5 years for vessels, such as
HMS charter/headboats that engage in
commercial fishing, operating beyond 3
nautical miles with the first exam
statutorily required by October 15, 2015.
A ‘‘certificate of compliance’’ will be
issued to a vessel successfully
completing the exam. Voluntary exams
will continue to be promoted for vessels
operating inside 3 nautical miles. USCG
estimates that the maximum initial cost
of this requirement per vessel will be
$600 and have a recurring cost of $600.
The classing of vessels provision
requires the survey and classification of
a fishing vessel that is at least 50 feet
overall in length, was built after July 1,
2013, and operates beyond 3 nautical
miles. It is unlikely that this
requirement will impact many Atlantic
HMS charter/headboat vessels because
the vessels are typically less than 50 feet
overall in length.
In sum, all 3,594 Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would
face an initial per vessel cost of $2,358.
The annual cost savings per vessel in
subsequent years would be
approximately $300 for the survival
craft, $18 for record keeping, and $120
($600/5 yrs) for examinations and
certificates of completion. The total
annual recurring cost saving per vessel
would be $438 for these three
requirements. These costs could be
higher for some individual vessels that
are too small or have too little storage
space for the survival craft requirement
because those vessels might require
extensive modifications to
accommodate the storage space for the
gear.
Under Alternative 2, the preferred
alternative, NMFS would modify the
regulations so that the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit alone does not allow
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
commercial sale and would also create
an endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that allows commercial
sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas with an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit are categorized as
commercial fishing vessels subject to
USCG commercial vessel fishing safety
requirements if they also possess a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of
whether the permit holder engages or
intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative
2, NMFS would create a ‘‘commercial
sale’’ endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit. Under the proposed
action, HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would be prohibited from
selling any catch of HMS unless they
apply for a commercial sale
endorsement to be added to their
permit. The commercial sale
endorsement could be added to the
Charter/Headboat permit at the time of
the permit application or renewal. Only
charter/headboat vessels with the
endorsement would be permitted to sell
HMS although they would not be
obligated to sell any HMS. Those vessels
holding an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale
endorsement would not be categorized
as a commercial fishing vessel and
would not be subject to the USCG
commercial safety gear requirements.
Those vessels that hold an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement would
be categorized as a commercial vessel
for the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing safety requirements.
The cost savings associated with
implementing a commercial
endorsement option for Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits would be that
approximately 93 percent of the permit
holders would not have to comply with
the costs associated with the USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, since Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would
not be considered commercial fishing
vessels unless they were issued the
commercial endorsement. The reduced
costs per vessel initially would be
approximately $1,740 for the survival
craft, $18 for record keeping, and $600
for examinations and certificates of
completion. The total initial costs saved
per vessel would be $2,358. The annual
cost savings per vessel in subsequent
years would be approximately $300 for
the survival craft, $18 for record
keeping, and $120 ($600/5 yrs) for
examinations and certificates of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
completion. The total annual recurring
cost saving per vessel would be $438 for
these three requirements. In addition to
the reduced costs associated with
complying with the USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements for
those HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders that do not intend to obtain the
endorsement to fish commercially, most
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would have to do nothing
different when obtaining their permit
unless they want to commercially sell
tunas or swordfish.
For the approximately 7 percent of
Atlantic Charter/Headboat permit
holders that want to obtain a
commercial endorsement to continue
selling tunas and swordfish in addition
to complying with the USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, they would need to obtain
an endorsement for the commercial sale
of Atlantic tunas and swordfish. HMS
charter/headboat permit holders issued
the commercial sale endorsement
selling sharks must obtain a commercial
shark permit in addition to an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. This would
likely only add a minute or so to the
time it takes to obtain the Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit and it would
not add to the cost of obtaining the
permit. NMFS would incur some costs
associated with altering the online
permit application to accommodate the
endorsement, along with some customer
service changes.
Under Alternative 3, NMFS would
remove the commercial sale provision of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas as a condition of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit and
may sell sharks if they also have a
commercial shark permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit currently are being
categorized by USCG as commercial
fishing vessels and subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements if they also hold a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of
whether the permit holder engages or
intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative
3, NMFS would remove the provision
that allows commercial sales under the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Thus,
holding an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit would no longer categorize a
vessel as a commercial fishing vessel.
charter/headboat vessel owners or
operators that wish to engage in
commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an
Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit.
The Atlantic Tunas General category
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49777
and Swordfish General Commercial
permits could be held in conjunction
with the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Those vessels with an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that do not intend to
sell HMS and do not obtain an Atlantic
Tunas General category, Swordfish
General Commercial, or commercial
shark permit would not be subject to
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 3 versus
the No Action alternative would be
identical to Alternative 2.
Approximately 93 percent of the permit
holders would not have to face the costs
associated with the USCG commercial
fishing safety requirements, since
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would not be considered
commercial fishing. The reduced costs
for the fleet would be approximately
$7,880,436 initially, and then
$3,067,956 annually thereafter. The 7
percent that wish to engage in
commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an
Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit.
This would cost them $20 to obtain
either the Atlantic Tunas General
category permit or the Swordfish
General Commercial permit. For the
approximately 252 vessel owners that
might obtain these $20 permits, the total
cost would be $5,040 to $10,080
annually depending on whether they
obtain one or both permits. In addition,
vessel owners may need to expend a bit
more time to complete the application
for these additional permits. NMFS
would incur costs associated with the
substantial permits site and customer
service changes that would be required
for this change. NMFS prefers
Alternative 2 over Alternative 3 because
a commercial sale endorsement
requirement more closely matches
current fishing practices and would
minimize disruptions. Currently, HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders can
sell some HMS and Alternative 2 would
allow them to continue by simply
obtaining an endorsement on their
Charter/Headboat permit. Alternative 3
would be more disruptive since it
would require fishermen to obtain
additional permits.
Under Alternative 4, NMFS would
create two separate Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits; one that
allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas
and swordfish, and one that does not.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas as a condition of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Consequently, vessels that hold an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit could be
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
49778
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
categorized as commercial fishing
vessels and subject to USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements,
regardless of whether the permit holder
engages or intends to sell HMS. Under
Alternative 4, NMFS would create two
separate HMS Charter/Headboat
permits; one that would allow
commercial sale of HMS, and one that
would not. Those vessels holding an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit that does
not allow commercial sale would not be
categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel and would not be subject to the
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Those vessels that hold
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that
allows commercial sale would be
categorized as commercial vessels for
the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 4 versus
the No Action alternative would be
identical to those provided by
Alternative 2. Approximately 93 percent
of the permit holders would not have to
face the costs associated with the USCG
commercial fishing safety requirements,
since Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders would not be considered
commercial fishing. The reduced costs
for the fleet would be approximately
$7,880,436 initially, and then
$3,067,956 annually thereafter. Under
this alternative, each of the 3,594
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would have to determine which
type of Charter/Headboat permit they
wish to obtain for the year, and all of
charter/headboat vessel owners would
have to learn the new permit process.
Unlike Alternative 3, there would be no
additional costs associated with
obtaining a commercial permit, because
under this alternative each would pick
either the no-sale HMS Charter/
Headboat permit or the commercial sale
Charter/Headboat permit. NMFS would
incur costs associated with the
substantial permits site and customer
service changes that would be required
for this change. NMFS would need to
develop new regulatory text to describe
these two new permits and fishery
participants would have to learn and
adapt to these changes.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels,
Foreign relations, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Treaties.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
Dated: October 20, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
50 CFR part 635 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 635—ATLANTIC HIGHLY
MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
2. In § 635.2, add a new definition for
‘‘Charter/headboat commercial sale
endorsement’’ in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
■
§ 635.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter/headboat commercial sale
endorsement means an authorization
added to an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit that is required for vessels that
sell or intend to sell Atlantic tunas,
sharks, and swordfish, provided that all
other requirements in this part are also
met.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 635.4,
■ (a) Revise paragraphs (a)(5), (d)(1),
(d)(2), introductory text for paragraph
(f), and paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and
(m)(2); and
■ (b) Add paragraph (b)(3).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 635.4
Permits and fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) Display upon offloading. Upon
offloading of Atlantic HMS for sale, the
owner or operator of the harvesting
vessel must present for inspection the
vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement;
Atlantic tunas, shark, or swordfish
permit; Incidental HMS squid trawl;
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit; and/or the shark research permit
to the first receiver. The permit(s) must
be presented prior to completing any
applicable landing report specified at
§ 635.5(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) The owner of a charter boat or
headboat that intends to sell Atlantic
tunas or swordfish must obtain a
commercial sale endorsement for the
vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
The owner of a charter boat or headboat
that intends to sell Atlantic sharks must
obtain a commercial sale endorsement
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for the vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat
permit and must also obtain any
applicable Atlantic commercial shark
permits. A vessel owner that has
obtained an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale
endorsement is prohibited from selling
any Atlantic HMS.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The owner of each vessel used to
fish for or take Atlantic tunas
commercially or on which Atlantic
tunas are retained or possessed with the
intention of sale must obtain an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section, an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of
this section, or an Atlantic tunas permit
in one, and only one, of the following
categories: General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap.
(2) Persons aboard a vessel with a
valid Atlantic Tunas, HMS Angling,
HMS Charter/Headboat, or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit may fish for, take, retain, or
possess Atlantic tunas, but only in
compliance with the quotas, catch
limits, size classes, and gear applicable
to the permit or permit category of the
vessel from which he or she is fishing.
Persons may sell Atlantic tunas only if
the harvesting vessel has a valid permit
in the General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap category of the
Atlantic Tunas permit, a valid HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement, or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Swordfish vessel permits.
(1) Except as specified in paragraphs
(n) and (o) of this section, the owner of
a vessel of the United States used to fish
for or take swordfish commercially from
the management unit, or on which
swordfish from the management unit are
retained or possessed with an intention
to sell, or sold must obtain, an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section, or
one of the following swordfish permits:
A swordfish directed limited access
permit, swordfish incidental limited
access permit, swordfish handgear
limited access permit, or a Swordfish
General Commercial permit. These
permits cannot be held in combination
with each other on the same vessel,
except that an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit with a commercial sale
endorsement may be held in
combination with a swordfish handgear
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
limited access permit on the same
vessel. It is a rebuttable presumption
that the owner or operator of a vessel on
which swordfish are possessed in excess
of the recreational retention limits
intends to sell the swordfish.
(2) The only valid commercial Federal
vessel permits for swordfish are the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section (and
only when on a non for-hire trip), the
Swordfish General Commercial permit
issued under paragraph (f) of this
section, a swordfish limited access
permit issued consistent with
paragraphs (l) and (m) of this section, or
permits issued under paragraphs (n) and
(o) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) Shark and swordfish permits. A
vessel owner must obtain the applicable
limited access permit(s) issued pursuant
to the requirements in paragraphs (e)
and (f) of this section and/or a Federal
commercial smoothhound permit issued
under paragraph (e) of this section; or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of
this section, if: The vessel is used to fish
for or take sharks commercially from the
management unit; sharks from the
management unit are retained or
possessed on the vessel with an
intention to sell; or sharks from the
management unit are sold from the
vessel. A vessel owner must obtain the
applicable limited access permit(s)
issued pursuant to the requirements in
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, a
Swordfish General Commercial permit
issued under paragraph (f) of this
section, an Incidental HMS Squid Trawl
permit issued under paragraph (n) of
this section, an HMS Commercial
Caribbean Small Boat permit issued
under paragraph (o) of this section, or
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with
a commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section,
which authorizes a Charter/Headboat to
fish commercially for swordfish on a
non for-hire trip subject to the retention
limits at § 635.24(b)(4) if: The vessel is
used to fish for or take swordfish
commercially from the management
unit; swordfish from the management
unit are retained or possessed on the
vessel with an intention to sell; or
swordfish from the management unit are
sold from the vessel. The commercial
retention and sale of swordfish from
vessels issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement is permissible only when
the vessel is on a non for-hire trip. Only
persons holding non-expired shark and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
swordfish limited access permit(s) in
the preceding year are eligible to renew
those limited access permit(s).
Transferors may not renew limited
access permits that have been
transferred according to the procedures
in paragraph (l) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 635.19, paragraph (d)(4) was
revised at 82 FR 16506, April 4, 2017,
effective January 1, 2018, and is further
revised to read as follows:
§ 635.19
Authorized gears.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) Persons on a vessel issued a permit
with a shark endorsement under § 635.4
may possess a shark only if the shark
was taken by rod and reel or handline,
except that persons on a vessel issued
both an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
(with or without a shark endorsement)
and a Federal Atlantic commercial shark
permit may possess sharks taken by rod
and reel, handline, bandit gear, longline,
or gillnet if the vessel is engaged in a
non for-hire fishing trip and the
commercial shark fishery is open
pursuant to § 635.28(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 635.22, revise the introductory
text in paragraph (f), and paragraphs
(f)(1) and (f)(2) to read as follows:
§ 635.22
Recreational retention limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) North Atlantic swordfish. The
recreational retention limits for North
Atlantic swordfish apply to persons
who fish in any manner, except to
persons aboard a vessel that has been
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
under § 635.4(b) and only when on a
non for-hire trip, a directed, incidental
or handgear limited access swordfish
permit under § 635.4(e) and (f), a
Swordfish General Commercial permit
under § 635.4(f), an Incidental HMS
Squid Trawl permit under § 635.4(n), or
an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small
boat permit under § 635.4(o).
(1) When on a for-hire trip as defined
at § 635.2, vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit under
§ 635.4(b), that are charter boats as
defined under § 600.10 of this chapter,
may retain, possess, or land no more
than one North Atlantic swordfish per
paying passenger and up to six North
Atlantic swordfish per vessel per trip.
When such vessels have been issued a
commercial sale endorsement and are
on a non for-hire trip, they must comply
with the commercial retention limits for
swordfish specified at § 635.24(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49779
(2) When on a for-hire trip as defined
at § 635.2, vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit under
§ 635.4(b), that are headboats as defined
under § 600.10 of this chapter, may
retain, possess, or land no more than
one North Atlantic swordfish per paying
passenger and up to 15 North Atlantic
swordfish per vessel per trip. When
such vessels have been issued a
commercial sale endorsement and are
on a non for-hire trip, they may land no
more than the commercial retention
limits for swordfish specified at
§ 635.24(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 635.23, revise paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 635.23
Retention limits for bluefin tuna.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) When fishing other than in the
Gulf of Mexico and when the fishery
under the General category has not been
closed under § 635.28, a person aboard
a vessel that has been issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement may fish
under either the retention limits
applicable to the General category
specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3)
of this section or the retention limits
applicable to the Angling category
specified in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3)
of this section. The size category of the
first BFT retained will determine the
fishing category applicable to the vessel
that day. A person aboard a vessel that
has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat without a commercial sale
endorsement permit may fish only
under the retention limits applicable to
the Angling category.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 635.24, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (b)(4), and paragraph
(b)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 635.24 Commercial retention limits for
sharks, swordfish, and BAYS tunas.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Persons aboard a vessel that has
been issued a Swordfish General
Commercial permit or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement (and only when on a non
for-hire trip) are subject to the regional
swordfish retention limits specified at
paragraph (b)(4)(iii), which may be
adjusted during the fishing year based
upon the inseason regional retention
limit adjustment criteria identified in
paragraph (b)(4)(iv) below.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Possession, retention, and landing
restrictions. Vessels that have been
issued a Swordfish General Commercial
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
49780
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
permit or an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit with a commercial sale
endorsement (and only when on a non
for-hire trip), as a condition of these
permits, may not possess, retain, or land
any more swordfish than is specified for
the region in which the vessel is
located.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 635.27, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(i), (c)(1)(i)(A), and (c)(1)(i)(B) to
read as follows:
§ 635.27
Quotas.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Catches from vessels for which
General category Atlantic Tunas permits
have been issued and certain catches
from vessels for which an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement has been issued are
counted against the General category
quota in accordance with § 635.23(c)(3).
Pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section,
the amount of large medium and giant
bluefin tuna that may be caught,
retained, possessed, landed, or sold
under the General category quota is
466.7 mt, and is apportioned as follows,
unless modified as described under
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A swordfish from the North
Atlantic stock caught prior to the
directed fishery closure by a vessel for
which a directed swordfish limited
access permit, a swordfish handgear
limited access permit, a HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only
when on a non for-hire trip) has been
issued or is required to have been issued
is counted against the directed fishery
quota. The total baseline annual fishery
quota, before any adjustments, is 2,937.6
mt dw for each fishing year. Consistent
with applicable ICCAT
recommendations, a portion of the total
baseline annual fishery quota may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
used for transfers to another ICCAT
contracting party. The annual directed
category quota is calculated by adjusting
for over- or under harvests, dead
discards, any applicable transfers, the
incidental category quota, the reserve
quota and other adjustments as needed,
and is subdivided into two equal semiannual periods: One for January 1
through June 30, and the other for July
1 through December 31.
(B) A swordfish from the North
Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental swordfish
limited access permit, an incidental
HMS Squid Trawl permit, an HMS
Angling permit, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit (and only when on a
for-hire trip) has been issued, or a
swordfish from the North Atlantic stock
caught after the effective date of a
closure of the directed fishery from a
vessel for which a swordfish directed
limited access permit, a swordfish
handgear limited access permit, a HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (when on
a non for-hire trip) has been issued, is
counted against the incidental category
quota. The annual incidental category
quota is 300 mt dw for each fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 635.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c)(6) to read as follows:
class. Also, no large medium or giant
bluefin tuna taken by a person aboard a
vessel with an Atlantic HMS Charter/
Headboat permit fishing in the Gulf of
Mexico at any time, or fishing outside
the Gulf of Mexico when the fishery
under the General category has been
closed, may be sold (see § 635.23(c)). A
person may sell Atlantic bluefin tuna
only to a dealer that has a valid permit
for purchasing Atlantic bluefin tuna
issued under this part. A person may
not sell or purchase Atlantic tunas
harvested with speargun fishing gear.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(6) A dealer issued a permit under
this part may not first receive silky
sharks, oceanic whitetip sharks or
scalloped, smooth, or great hammerhead
sharks from an owner or operator of a
fishing vessel with pelagic longline gear
on board, or from the owner of a fishing
vessel issued both a HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement and a commercial shark
permit when tuna, swordfish or billfish
are on board the vessel, offloaded from
the vessel, or being offloaded from the
vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 635.71, revise paragraph (a)
and add paragraph (a)(62) to read as
follows:
§ 635.31 Restrictions on sale and
purchase.
(a) * * *
(2) Fish for, catch, possess, retain,
land, or sell Atlantic HMS without the
appropriate valid vessel permit, LAP,
EFP, scientific research permit, display
permit, chartering permit, or shark
research permit on board the vessel, as
specified in §§ 635.4 and 635.32.
*
*
*
*
*
(62) A vessel owner that has obtained
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
without a commercial sale endorsement
is prohibited from selling any Atlantic
HMS.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) A person that owns or operates a
vessel from which an Atlantic tuna is
landed or offloaded may sell such
Atlantic tuna only if that vessel has a
valid HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement; a
valid General, Harpoon, Longline, Purse
Seine, or Trap category permit for
Atlantic tunas; or a valid HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under this part and the
appropriate category has not been
closed, as specified at § 635.28(a).
However, no person may sell a bluefin
tuna smaller than the large medium size
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
§ 635.71
Prohibitions.
[FR Doc. 2017–23277 Filed 10–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49773-49780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23277]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 170901859-7999-01]
RIN 0648-BH19
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Charter/Headboat Permit
Commercial Sale Provision
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would make HMS Charter/Headboat permits a
non-commercial category and create a separate regulatory provision for
the commercial sale of Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) by HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders. Currently, all vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit could be categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel and subject to United States Coast Guard (USCG) commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements if they also possess a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of whether the permit holder engages
or intends to engage in commercial fishing. Under the proposed rule,
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would be prohibited from selling
Atlantic tunas or swordfish unless they obtain a ``commercial sale''
endorsement for their permit. This proposed rule would clarify which
HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels are properly categorized as
commercial fishing vessels. This action would be administrative in
nature and would not affect fishing practices or result in any
significant environmental or economic impacts.
This proposed rule has a 15-day comment period. The abbreviated
comment period is necessary to implement any management changes before
January 1, 2018 to ensure all HMS charter/headboat vessels are
appropriately categorized as commercial or non-commercial upon initial
application or renewal of 2018 HMS Charter/Headboat permits. We do not
anticipate the proposal to be controversial or to generate significant
public comment and believe that a 15-day comment period will be
sufficient to attract any substantive public input.
DATES: Written comments must be received by November 13, 2017. An
operator-assisted, public conference call and webinar will be held on
November 1, 2017, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., EST.
ADDRESSES: The conference call information is phone number 1 (888) 664-
9965; participant passcode 5355311. Participants are strongly
encouraged to log/dial in fifteen minutes prior to the meeting. NMFS
will show a brief presentation via webinar followed by an opportunity
for public comment. To join the webinar go to: https://noaaevents2.webex.com/noaaevents2/onstage/g.php?MTID=efb2b4e48c0c4b75f50900b90743b7a18, event password: noaa.
Participants that have not used WebEx before will be prompted to
download and run a plug-in program that will enable them to view the
webinar.
You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-
2017-0124, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0124, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Margo Schulze-Haugen,
NMFS/SF1, 1315 East-West Highway, National Marine Fisheries Service,
SSMC3, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will
[[Page 49774]]
be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/
A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Written
comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed rule
may be submitted to the HMS Management Division by email to
[email protected] or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Presentation materials and copies of the supporting documents--
including the 2006 Consolidated HMS Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and
its amendments and associated documents--are available from the HMS
Management Division Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/ or by
contacting Dianne Stephan by phone at 978-281-9260.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dianne Stephan or Tobey Curtis by
phone at 978-281-9260, or Steve Durkee by phone at 202-670-6637.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Atlantic HMS regulations at 50 CFR 635.4(b) require that charter/
headboat vessels (i.e., vessels taking fee-paying passengers) used to
fish for, take, retain, or possess Atlantic HMS, must obtain an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. In addition to carrying paying passengers, the
permit also allows charter/headboat fishermen to diversify their
operations by fishing commercially for Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
They may also sell sharks if they have a commercial shark permit in
addition to the Charter/Headboat permit. Relatively few permit holders
use the commercial sale provision. From 2012-2016, an annual average of
only seven percent of HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders sold any tuna
or swordfish.
Legislation and United States Coast Guard (USCG) commercial fishing
vessel safety policies and regulatory interpretation may result in an
increased compliance burden for HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels.
Commercial fishing vessel safety provisions contained in the Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (CGAA) and the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 were the subject of a Marine Safety
Information Bulletin (MSIB 12-15) issued by the USCG on October 20,
2015. MSIB 12-15 clarified that the law would require mandatory
dockside safety exams to a broader population of commercial fishing
vessels. As clarified in the notice, that broader community included
HMS Charter/Headboat vessels that were authorized by the permit to sell
fish commercially (e.g., all Charter/Headboat vessels) who also
possessed a state commercial sale permit. The mandatory safety exam
includes a check for required commercial fishing vessel safety
equipment such as life rafts, emergency beacons, and survival suits,
and other requirements found in 46 CFR part 28. Outfitting a vessel
with these items comes at a substantial cost. Mandatory dockside safety
exams for vessels operating beyond three nautical miles from the
baseline under this program began October 15, 2015.
The mandatory safety requirements have been difficult to enforce
pending a more effective way to identify which HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders engage in commercial fishing and are therefore subject
to the requirements. After receiving questions about applicability from
NMFS and the regulated community, on July 10, 2017, the USCG issued
Marine Safety Information Bulletin (MSIB 008-17) in an attempt to
clarify the applicability of commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements for vessels with HMS permits, including HMS Charter/
Headboat permits. USCG regulations at 46 CFR 28.50 define a commercial
fishing vessel as a vessel that commercially engages in the catching,
taking, or harvesting of fish, or an activity that can reasonably be
expected to result in the catching, taking, or harvesting of fish.
According to the MSIB 008-17, if an individual has an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit (which allows commercial sale) and a state permit to
sell catch, the vessel is considered subject to commercial fishing
vessel safety regulations.
Many HMS Charter/Headboat operators that neither sell, nor intend
to sell, their catch but hold a permit to sell have thus found that the
USCG policy identifies their operations as a ``commercial fishing
vessel,'' and requires them to adhere to USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements. For example, even small charter vessels (i.e.,
less than 20 feet in length) operating in the warm waters of the Gulf
of Mexico and with no intent to sell HMS, may be required under the
USCG regulations to carry an inflatable life raft that can cost
approximately $1,750. In addition to the cost burden, a vessel of this
size has minimal space to store such gear. These smaller HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels were previously subject to the USCG safety
regulations for uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross
tons and carrying six or less passengers, which are less extensive and
less costly.
In late 2016 and early 2017, NMFS and the USCG staff informally
discussed how to more effectively categorize HMS charter/headboat
vessels under USCG regulations. On October 6, 2017, the USCG formally
reviewed this proposed rule and concurred with the approach to provide
clarity on the applicability on their requirements. The HMS Advisory
Panel discussed this issue at length at its May and September 2017
meetings. Many HMS Advisory Panel members, including commercial,
recreational, and council/state representatives, supported creating a
separate regulatory provision for charter/headboat vessels that intend
to sell HMS and to thus specify that other such vessels were not
engaged in commercial sale and not subject to expensive USCG commercial
vessel compliance obligations. Panel members stated that creating a
separate sale provision would support more appropriate application and
enforcement of USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements in
the Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat fishery, and would better clarify for
permit holders which USCG regulations apply to their vessels and
fishing operations.
Proposed Action
This rule proposes to create a ``commercial sale'' endorsement on
the existing HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Under the proposed rule, HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would be prohibited from selling any
catch of HMS unless they first obtain a ``commercial sale'' endorsement
on their permit. Only those HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders with
the endorsement would be permitted to sell Atlantic tunas or swordfish
or sharks if they also have the additionally required commercial shark
permit.
This proposed rule clarifies that any HMS Charter/Headboat vessel
that selects this commercial sale endorsement would be categorized as a
commercial fishing vessel under USCG criteria, and therefore subject to
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements. Those vessels
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit without a ``commercial sale''
endorsement would not be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel and
would not be subject to the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders with the commercial
sale endorsement selling a tuna or swordfish must adhere to the
applicable Atlantic Tunas General Category or General Commercial
Swordfish permit possession limits and restrictions, and the landings
would be applied against the appropriate commercial quota. HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders that sell or intend to sell sharks must also
obtain
[[Page 49775]]
the commercial sale endorsement on their permit as well as a commercial
shark permit. This proposed rule would only change the permit category
under which certain vessels are fishing. It would not affect quotas,
gear types, or time/area restrictions, and neither increase or decrease
fishing effort or affect fishing timing nor implement other measures
that would potentially have any environmental impacts or effects.
Request for Comments
NMFS is requesting comments on the alternatives and analyses
described in this proposed rule, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis (IRFA) and Regulatory Impact Review (RIR). Comments may be
submitted via https://www.regulations.gov, mail, or fax. Comments may
also be submitted at a public hearing (see Public Hearings and Special
Accommodations below). NMFS solicits comments on this proposed rule by
November 13, 2017 (see DATES and ADDRESSES).
Public Hearings
Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted via https://www.regulations.gov, mail, or fax and comments may also be submitted at
a public hearing. During the comment period, NMFS will hold one webinar
conference call for this proposed rule (see ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and
Conservation (Magnuson-Stevens) Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that the proposed rule is consistent with the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and which has been
submitted to OMB under control number (0648-0327). Public reporting
burden for HMS Charter/Headboat permit applications initial response is
estimated to average 30 minutes and renewal by telephone or web is
estimated to average 6 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by
email to [email protected],or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
For the reasons described in the preamble, this proposed rule is
expected to be deregulatory under Executive Order 13771.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
This proposed rule has a 15-day comment period. The abbreviated
comment period is necessary to implement any management changes before
January 1, 2018 to ensure all HMS charter/headboat vessels are
appropriately categorized as commercial or non-commercial upon initial
application or renewal of 2018 HMS Charter/Headboat permits. This will
avoid additional administrative burden on the agency and the regulated
community that would result from a later implementation date, which
would require those vessel owners needing the commercial endorsement to
engage in an additional process. We do not anticipate the proposal to
be controversial or to generate significant public comment and believe
that a 15-day comment period will be sufficient to attract any
substantive public input.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A copy of this
analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The following is a
summary of the IRFA.
Description of the Reasons Why Action Is Being Considered
A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the
legal basis for this action are contained in the Background section of
the preamble and in the SUMMARY of this proposed rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rule Would Apply
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires agencies to provide an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria
for all major industry sectors in the United States, including for-hire
charter/headboat businesses. For-hire charter/headboat business fit
into the ``Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water'' industry
under NAICS code 487210. SBA has established that the small entity size
standard for that industry is $7.5 million in average annual receipts.
Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to develop
its own industry-specific size standards after consultation with
Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)).
Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards that differ
from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards, but only
for use by NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an analysis of
economic effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations under the
RFA. To utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size standards
in the Federal Register (FR), which NMFS did on December 29, 2015 (80
FR 81194, December 29, 2015). In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing
industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes.
NMFS considers all HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders (3,594 as of
October 2016) to be small entities because these vessels have reported
annual gross receipts of less than $11 million for commercial fishing
or earn less than $7.5 million from for-hire fishing trips.
NMFS has determined that this proposed rule would apply to the
small businesses associated with the approximately seven percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that also commercially fish for
swordfish and tuna. Based on the most recent number of permit holders,
NMFS estimates that this proposed rule would apply to approximately 252
HMS Charter/Headboat vessel owners. NMFS has determined that this
action would not likely directly affect any small organizations or
small government jurisdictions defined under the RFA.
[[Page 49776]]
Description of the Projected Reporting, Record-Keeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of the Proposed Rule, Including an Estimate of
the Classes of Small Entities Which Would Be Subject to the
Requirements of the Report or Record
Section 603(b)(4) of the RFA requires Agencies to describe any new
reporting, record-keeping and other compliance requirements. This
proposed rule would create a ``commercial sale'' endorsement for the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Under the proposed rule, HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders would be prohibited from selling any catch of
HMS unless they obtain a commercial sale endorsement on their permit.
The commercial sale endorsement could be added to the Charter/Headboat
permit at the time of the permit application or renewal, or anytime
thereafter. Only Charter/Headboat permit holders with the endorsement
would be allowed to sell HMS although they would not be obligated to
sell any HMS. There would be no additional charge for the commercial
sale endorsement above the cost of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit; the
endorsement would add less than a minute more of labor effort to the
normal HMS Charter/Headboat permit process. Those vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a ``commercial sale'' endorsement would be
categorized as a commercial vessel for the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirement.
Identification of All Relevant Federal Rules Which May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict with the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule has been determined not to duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any Federal rules. This rule is being proposed to
address changes in USCG commercial fishing vessel safety policies and
regulatory interpretation that would result in an increased compliance
burden for HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders due to the Coast Guard's
broader definition of commercial fishing vessels. This proposed rule
would clarify which HMS charter/headboat vessels are truly operating as
commercial fishing vessels versus those that neither sell, nor intend
to sell, their catch, which includes the majority of charter/headboat
vessels.
Description of Any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of the Applicable Statutes and That
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule on Small
Entities
NMFS considered four different alternatives to separate the
commercial sale provision from the HMS Charter/Headboat permit, and
thus relieve some HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders from the changes
in USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements. Alternative 1,
the status quo/no action alternative, would make no changes to current
HMS regulations. Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, would create
an endorsement for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit that allows
commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish. Alternative 3 would
remove the commercial sale provision of the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Alternative 4 would create two separate HMS Charter/Headboat
permits; one that allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and
swordfish, and one that does not.
Under the ``no action'' Alternative 1, NMFS would maintain the
current regulations regarding the Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under current regulations at 635.4(b), permit holders taking fee-paying
passengers to fish for HMS (i.e. charter boats or headboats) must
obtain the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Since HMS Charter/Headboat
permits allow the commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish, the
vessels would now be subject to USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, regardless of whether the permit holder intends to sell
HMS. However, without a change to the HMS Charter/Headboat permit
regulations, USCG will consider all HMS charter/headboat vessels as
commercial fishing vessels that must adhere to the to USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels were previously subject to the USCG safety regulations for
uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross tons and carrying
six or less passengers, which are less extensive and less costly.
Under the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements, many
Atlantic HMS charter/headboats would have to comply with four rule
requirements for survival craft, record keeping, examinations and
certificates of compliance, and classing of vessels.
The survival craft requirement establishes that all fishing
industry vessels operating beyond 3 nautical miles must carry survival
craft that will meet a new performance standard for primary lifesaving
equipment. The use of ``lifeboats or liferafts'' are required for
commercial vessels, whereas strictly for-hire vessels are only required
to a have ``a survival craft that ensures that no part of an individual
is immersed in water.'' This means that lifefloats and buoyant
apparatus will no longer be accepted as survival craft on any
commercial fishing vessel operating beyond 3 nautical miles once the
most recent USCG guidance in fully enforced. Some HMS Charter/Headboat
permitted vessels would incorrectly be identified as commercial
vessels, subject to the more stringent lifeboat/liferaft requirements.
USCG estimates that the maximum initial cost of this requirement per
vessel will be $1,740 and have a recurring annual cost of $300. The
records provision requires the individual in charge of a vessel
operating beyond 3 nautical miles to maintain a record of lifesaving
and fire equipment maintenance. It will be incumbent upon the master/
individual in charge of the vessel to maintain these records onboard.
The USCG estimates this record keeping requirement will cost $18
annually per vessel.
The examinations and certificates of compliance provision requires
a dockside safety examination at least once every 5 years for vessels,
such as HMS charter/headboats that engage in commercial fishing,
operating beyond 3 nautical miles with the first exam statutorily
required by October 15, 2015. A ``certificate of compliance'' will be
issued to a vessel successfully completing the exam. Voluntary exams
will continue to be promoted for vessels operating inside 3 nautical
miles. USCG estimates that the maximum initial cost of this requirement
per vessel will be $600 and have a recurring cost of $600.
The classing of vessels provision requires the survey and
classification of a fishing vessel that is at least 50 feet overall in
length, was built after July 1, 2013, and operates beyond 3 nautical
miles. It is unlikely that this requirement will impact many Atlantic
HMS charter/headboat vessels because the vessels are typically less
than 50 feet overall in length.
In sum, all 3,594 Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
would face an initial per vessel cost of $2,358. The annual cost
savings per vessel in subsequent years would be approximately $300 for
the survival craft, $18 for record keeping, and $120 ($600/5 yrs) for
examinations and certificates of completion. The total annual recurring
cost saving per vessel would be $438 for these three requirements.
These costs could be higher for some individual vessels that are too
small or have too little storage space for the survival craft
requirement because those vessels might require extensive modifications
to accommodate the storage space for the gear.
Under Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, NMFS would modify
the regulations so that the HMS Charter/Headboat permit alone does not
allow
[[Page 49777]]
commercial sale and would also create an endorsement for the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit that allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas
and swordfish. Currently, charter/headboat vessels are able, though not
obligated, to sell swordfish and tunas with an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Consequently, vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
are categorized as commercial fishing vessels subject to USCG
commercial vessel fishing safety requirements if they also possess a
state commercial sale permit, regardless of whether the permit holder
engages or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 2, NMFS would create
a ``commercial sale'' endorsement for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under the proposed action, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would be
prohibited from selling any catch of HMS unless they apply for a
commercial sale endorsement to be added to their permit. The commercial
sale endorsement could be added to the Charter/Headboat permit at the
time of the permit application or renewal. Only charter/headboat
vessels with the endorsement would be permitted to sell HMS although
they would not be obligated to sell any HMS. Those vessels holding an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit without a commercial sale endorsement would
not be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel and would not be
subject to the USCG commercial safety gear requirements. Those vessels
that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a ``commercial sale''
endorsement would be categorized as a commercial vessel for the
purposes of USCG commercial fishing safety requirements.
The cost savings associated with implementing a commercial
endorsement option for Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permits would be
that approximately 93 percent of the permit holders would not have to
comply with the costs associated with the USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements, since Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would not be considered commercial fishing vessels unless they
were issued the commercial endorsement. The reduced costs per vessel
initially would be approximately $1,740 for the survival craft, $18 for
record keeping, and $600 for examinations and certificates of
completion. The total initial costs saved per vessel would be $2,358.
The annual cost savings per vessel in subsequent years would be
approximately $300 for the survival craft, $18 for record keeping, and
$120 ($600/5 yrs) for examinations and certificates of completion. The
total annual recurring cost saving per vessel would be $438 for these
three requirements. In addition to the reduced costs associated with
complying with the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements
for those HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders that do not intend to
obtain the endorsement to fish commercially, most Atlantic HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders would have to do nothing different when
obtaining their permit unless they want to commercially sell tunas or
swordfish.
For the approximately 7 percent of Atlantic Charter/Headboat permit
holders that want to obtain a commercial endorsement to continue
selling tunas and swordfish in addition to complying with the USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements, they would need to
obtain an endorsement for the commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and
swordfish. HMS charter/headboat permit holders issued the commercial
sale endorsement selling sharks must obtain a commercial shark permit
in addition to an HMS Charter/Headboat permit. This would likely only
add a minute or so to the time it takes to obtain the Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit and it would not add to the cost of obtaining
the permit. NMFS would incur some costs associated with altering the
online permit application to accommodate the endorsement, along with
some customer service changes.
Under Alternative 3, NMFS would remove the commercial sale
provision of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Currently, charter/
headboat vessels are able, though not obligated, to sell swordfish and
tunas as a condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit and may sell
sharks if they also have a commercial shark permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit currently are being
categorized by USCG as commercial fishing vessels and subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements if they also hold a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of whether the permit holder engages
or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 3, NMFS would remove the
provision that allows commercial sales under the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Thus, holding an HMS Charter/Headboat permit would no longer
categorize a vessel as a commercial fishing vessel. charter/headboat
vessel owners or operators that wish to engage in commercial sale of
tunas and swordfish would instead need to obtain an Atlantic tunas
General category and/or Swordfish General Commercial permit. The
Atlantic Tunas General category and Swordfish General Commercial
permits could be held in conjunction with the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Those vessels with an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that do not
intend to sell HMS and do not obtain an Atlantic Tunas General
category, Swordfish General Commercial, or commercial shark permit
would not be subject to USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 3 versus the No Action alternative
would be identical to Alternative 2. Approximately 93 percent of the
permit holders would not have to face the costs associated with the
USCG commercial fishing safety requirements, since Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would not be considered commercial
fishing. The reduced costs for the fleet would be approximately
$7,880,436 initially, and then $3,067,956 annually thereafter. The 7
percent that wish to engage in commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit. This would cost them $20 to obtain
either the Atlantic Tunas General category permit or the Swordfish
General Commercial permit. For the approximately 252 vessel owners that
might obtain these $20 permits, the total cost would be $5,040 to
$10,080 annually depending on whether they obtain one or both permits.
In addition, vessel owners may need to expend a bit more time to
complete the application for these additional permits. NMFS would incur
costs associated with the substantial permits site and customer service
changes that would be required for this change. NMFS prefers
Alternative 2 over Alternative 3 because a commercial sale endorsement
requirement more closely matches current fishing practices and would
minimize disruptions. Currently, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
can sell some HMS and Alternative 2 would allow them to continue by
simply obtaining an endorsement on their Charter/Headboat permit.
Alternative 3 would be more disruptive since it would require fishermen
to obtain additional permits.
Under Alternative 4, NMFS would create two separate Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits; one that allows commercial sale of Atlantic
tunas and swordfish, and one that does not. Currently, charter/headboat
vessels are able, though not obligated, to sell swordfish and tunas as
a condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Consequently, vessels
that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit could be
[[Page 49778]]
categorized as commercial fishing vessels and subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements, regardless of whether
the permit holder engages or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 4,
NMFS would create two separate HMS Charter/Headboat permits; one that
would allow commercial sale of HMS, and one that would not. Those
vessels holding an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that does not allow
commercial sale would not be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel
and would not be subject to the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Those vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
that allows commercial sale would be categorized as commercial vessels
for the purposes of USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 4 versus the No Action alternative
would be identical to those provided by Alternative 2. Approximately 93
percent of the permit holders would not have to face the costs
associated with the USCG commercial fishing safety requirements, since
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would not be considered
commercial fishing. The reduced costs for the fleet would be
approximately $7,880,436 initially, and then $3,067,956 annually
thereafter. Under this alternative, each of the 3,594 Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would have to determine which type of
Charter/Headboat permit they wish to obtain for the year, and all of
charter/headboat vessel owners would have to learn the new permit
process. Unlike Alternative 3, there would be no additional costs
associated with obtaining a commercial permit, because under this
alternative each would pick either the no-sale HMS Charter/Headboat
permit or the commercial sale Charter/Headboat permit. NMFS would incur
costs associated with the substantial permits site and customer service
changes that would be required for this change. NMFS would need to
develop new regulatory text to describe these two new permits and
fishery participants would have to learn and adapt to these changes.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign relations, Imports,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: October 20, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 635.2, add a new definition for ``Charter/headboat
commercial sale endorsement'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 635.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Charter/headboat commercial sale endorsement means an authorization
added to an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that is required for vessels
that sell or intend to sell Atlantic tunas, sharks, and swordfish,
provided that all other requirements in this part are also met.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 635.4,
0
(a) Revise paragraphs (a)(5), (d)(1), (d)(2), introductory text for
paragraph (f), and paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (m)(2); and
0
(b) Add paragraph (b)(3).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 635.4 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) Display upon offloading. Upon offloading of Atlantic HMS for
sale, the owner or operator of the harvesting vessel must present for
inspection the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial
sale endorsement; Atlantic tunas, shark, or swordfish permit;
Incidental HMS squid trawl; HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit;
and/or the shark research permit to the first receiver. The permit(s)
must be presented prior to completing any applicable landing report
specified at Sec. 635.5(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2)(i).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) The owner of a charter boat or headboat that intends to sell
Atlantic tunas or swordfish must obtain a commercial sale endorsement
for the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat permit. The owner of a charter
boat or headboat that intends to sell Atlantic sharks must obtain a
commercial sale endorsement for the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat
permit and must also obtain any applicable Atlantic commercial shark
permits. A vessel owner that has obtained an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale endorsement is prohibited from selling
any Atlantic HMS.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) The owner of each vessel used to fish for or take Atlantic
tunas commercially or on which Atlantic tunas are retained or possessed
with the intention of sale must obtain an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement issued under paragraph (b) of this
section, an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit issued under
paragraph (o) of this section, or an Atlantic tunas permit in one, and
only one, of the following categories: General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap.
(2) Persons aboard a vessel with a valid Atlantic Tunas, HMS
Angling, HMS Charter/Headboat, or an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small
Boat permit may fish for, take, retain, or possess Atlantic tunas, but
only in compliance with the quotas, catch limits, size classes, and
gear applicable to the permit or permit category of the vessel from
which he or she is fishing. Persons may sell Atlantic tunas only if the
harvesting vessel has a valid permit in the General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap category of the Atlantic Tunas permit, a valid HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement, or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit.
* * * * *
(f) Swordfish vessel permits.
(1) Except as specified in paragraphs (n) and (o) of this section,
the owner of a vessel of the United States used to fish for or take
swordfish commercially from the management unit, or on which swordfish
from the management unit are retained or possessed with an intention to
sell, or sold must obtain, an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued under paragraph (b) of this section,
or one of the following swordfish permits: A swordfish directed limited
access permit, swordfish incidental limited access permit, swordfish
handgear limited access permit, or a Swordfish General Commercial
permit. These permits cannot be held in combination with each other on
the same vessel, except that an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement may be held in combination with a swordfish
handgear
[[Page 49779]]
limited access permit on the same vessel. It is a rebuttable
presumption that the owner or operator of a vessel on which swordfish
are possessed in excess of the recreational retention limits intends to
sell the swordfish.
(2) The only valid commercial Federal vessel permits for swordfish
are the HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement
issued under paragraph (b) of this section (and only when on a non for-
hire trip), the Swordfish General Commercial permit issued under
paragraph (f) of this section, a swordfish limited access permit issued
consistent with paragraphs (l) and (m) of this section, or permits
issued under paragraphs (n) and (o) of this section.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(2) Shark and swordfish permits. A vessel owner must obtain the
applicable limited access permit(s) issued pursuant to the requirements
in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section and/or a Federal commercial
smoothhound permit issued under paragraph (e) of this section; or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit issued under paragraph (o)
of this section, if: The vessel is used to fish for or take sharks
commercially from the management unit; sharks from the management unit
are retained or possessed on the vessel with an intention to sell; or
sharks from the management unit are sold from the vessel. A vessel
owner must obtain the applicable limited access permit(s) issued
pursuant to the requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section,
a Swordfish General Commercial permit issued under paragraph (f) of
this section, an Incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit issued under
paragraph (n) of this section, an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of this section, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement issued under
paragraph (b) of this section, which authorizes a Charter/Headboat to
fish commercially for swordfish on a non for-hire trip subject to the
retention limits at Sec. 635.24(b)(4) if: The vessel is used to fish
for or take swordfish commercially from the management unit; swordfish
from the management unit are retained or possessed on the vessel with
an intention to sell; or swordfish from the management unit are sold
from the vessel. The commercial retention and sale of swordfish from
vessels issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement is permissible only when the vessel is on a non for-hire
trip. Only persons holding non-expired shark and swordfish limited
access permit(s) in the preceding year are eligible to renew those
limited access permit(s). Transferors may not renew limited access
permits that have been transferred according to the procedures in
paragraph (l) of this section.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 635.19, paragraph (d)(4) was revised at 82 FR 16506, April
4, 2017, effective January 1, 2018, and is further revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 635.19 Authorized gears.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) Persons on a vessel issued a permit with a shark endorsement
under Sec. 635.4 may possess a shark only if the shark was taken by
rod and reel or handline, except that persons on a vessel issued both
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement (with
or without a shark endorsement) and a Federal Atlantic commercial shark
permit may possess sharks taken by rod and reel, handline, bandit gear,
longline, or gillnet if the vessel is engaged in a non for-hire fishing
trip and the commercial shark fishery is open pursuant to Sec.
635.28(b).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 635.22, revise the introductory text in paragraph (f), and
paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.22 Recreational retention limits.
* * * * *
(f) North Atlantic swordfish. The recreational retention limits for
North Atlantic swordfish apply to persons who fish in any manner,
except to persons aboard a vessel that has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement under Sec. 635.4(b)
and only when on a non for-hire trip, a directed, incidental or
handgear limited access swordfish permit under Sec. 635.4(e) and (f),
a Swordfish General Commercial permit under Sec. 635.4(f), an
Incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit under Sec. 635.4(n), or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small boat permit under Sec. 635.4(o).
(1) When on a for-hire trip as defined at Sec. 635.2, vessels
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit under Sec. 635.4(b), that are
charter boats as defined under Sec. 600.10 of this chapter, may
retain, possess, or land no more than one North Atlantic swordfish per
paying passenger and up to six North Atlantic swordfish per vessel per
trip. When such vessels have been issued a commercial sale endorsement
and are on a non for-hire trip, they must comply with the commercial
retention limits for swordfish specified at Sec. 635.24(b)(4).
(2) When on a for-hire trip as defined at Sec. 635.2, vessels
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit under Sec. 635.4(b), that are
headboats as defined under Sec. 600.10 of this chapter, may retain,
possess, or land no more than one North Atlantic swordfish per paying
passenger and up to 15 North Atlantic swordfish per vessel per trip.
When such vessels have been issued a commercial sale endorsement and
are on a non for-hire trip, they may land no more than the commercial
retention limits for swordfish specified at Sec. 635.24(b)(4).
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 635.23, revise paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.23 Retention limits for bluefin tuna.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) When fishing other than in the Gulf of Mexico and when the
fishery under the General category has not been closed under Sec.
635.28, a person aboard a vessel that has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement may fish under
either the retention limits applicable to the General category
specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section or the
retention limits applicable to the Angling category specified in
paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section. The size category of the
first BFT retained will determine the fishing category applicable to
the vessel that day. A person aboard a vessel that has been issued an
HMS Charter/Headboat without a commercial sale endorsement permit may
fish only under the retention limits applicable to the Angling
category.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 635.24, revise the introductory text of paragraph (b)(4),
and paragraph (b)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.24 Commercial retention limits for sharks, swordfish, and
BAYS tunas.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Persons aboard a vessel that has been issued a Swordfish
General Commercial permit or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip) are
subject to the regional swordfish retention limits specified at
paragraph (b)(4)(iii), which may be adjusted during the fishing year
based upon the inseason regional retention limit adjustment criteria
identified in paragraph (b)(4)(iv) below.
* * * * *
(ii) Possession, retention, and landing restrictions. Vessels that
have been issued a Swordfish General Commercial
[[Page 49780]]
permit or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip), as a condition of
these permits, may not possess, retain, or land any more swordfish than
is specified for the region in which the vessel is located.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 635.27, revise paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (c)(1)(i)(A), and
(c)(1)(i)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.27 Quotas.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Catches from vessels for which General category Atlantic Tunas
permits have been issued and certain catches from vessels for which an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement has been
issued are counted against the General category quota in accordance
with Sec. 635.23(c)(3). Pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the
amount of large medium and giant bluefin tuna that may be caught,
retained, possessed, landed, or sold under the General category quota
is 466.7 mt, and is apportioned as follows, unless modified as
described under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section:
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A swordfish from the North Atlantic stock caught prior to the
directed fishery closure by a vessel for which a directed swordfish
limited access permit, a swordfish handgear limited access permit, a
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip) has
been issued or is required to have been issued is counted against the
directed fishery quota. The total baseline annual fishery quota, before
any adjustments, is 2,937.6 mt dw for each fishing year. Consistent
with applicable ICCAT recommendations, a portion of the total baseline
annual fishery quota may be used for transfers to another ICCAT
contracting party. The annual directed category quota is calculated by
adjusting for over- or under harvests, dead discards, any applicable
transfers, the incidental category quota, the reserve quota and other
adjustments as needed, and is subdivided into two equal semi-annual
periods: One for January 1 through June 30, and the other for July 1
through December 31.
(B) A swordfish from the North Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental swordfish limited access permit, an
incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit, an HMS Angling permit, or an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit (and only when on a for-hire trip) has been
issued, or a swordfish from the North Atlantic stock caught after the
effective date of a closure of the directed fishery from a vessel for
which a swordfish directed limited access permit, a swordfish handgear
limited access permit, a HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit, a
Swordfish General Commercial open access permit, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement (when on a non for-
hire trip) has been issued, is counted against the incidental category
quota. The annual incidental category quota is 300 mt dw for each
fishing year.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 635.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(6) to read as
follows:
Sec. 635.31 Restrictions on sale and purchase.
(a) * * *
(1) A person that owns or operates a vessel from which an Atlantic
tuna is landed or offloaded may sell such Atlantic tuna only if that
vessel has a valid HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement; a valid General, Harpoon, Longline, Purse Seine, or Trap
category permit for Atlantic tunas; or a valid HMS Commercial Caribbean
Small Boat permit issued under this part and the appropriate category
has not been closed, as specified at Sec. 635.28(a). However, no
person may sell a bluefin tuna smaller than the large medium size
class. Also, no large medium or giant bluefin tuna taken by a person
aboard a vessel with an Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit fishing in
the Gulf of Mexico at any time, or fishing outside the Gulf of Mexico
when the fishery under the General category has been closed, may be
sold (see Sec. 635.23(c)). A person may sell Atlantic bluefin tuna
only to a dealer that has a valid permit for purchasing Atlantic
bluefin tuna issued under this part. A person may not sell or purchase
Atlantic tunas harvested with speargun fishing gear.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
* * * * *
(6) A dealer issued a permit under this part may not first receive
silky sharks, oceanic whitetip sharks or scalloped, smooth, or great
hammerhead sharks from an owner or operator of a fishing vessel with
pelagic longline gear on board, or from the owner of a fishing vessel
issued both a HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement and a commercial shark permit when tuna, swordfish or
billfish are on board the vessel, offloaded from the vessel, or being
offloaded from the vessel.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 635.71, revise paragraph (a) and add paragraph (a)(62) to
read as follows:
Sec. 635.71 Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(2) Fish for, catch, possess, retain, land, or sell Atlantic HMS
without the appropriate valid vessel permit, LAP, EFP, scientific
research permit, display permit, chartering permit, or shark research
permit on board the vessel, as specified in Sec. Sec. 635.4 and
635.32.
* * * * *
(62) A vessel owner that has obtained an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale endorsement is prohibited from selling
any Atlantic HMS.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-23277 Filed 10-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P