Statutorily Mandated Designation of Difficult Development Areas and Qualified Census Tracts: Revision of Effective Date for 2015 Designations, 49653-49654 [2017-23306]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2017 / Notices
This Notice
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5815–N–03]
Statutorily Mandated Designation of
Difficult Development Areas and
Qualified Census Tracts: Revision of
Effective Date for 2015 Designations
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Policy Development and
Research, HUD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This document revises the
effective date for designations of
‘‘Difficult Development Areas’’ (DDAs)
and ‘‘Qualified Census Tracts’’ (QCTs)
for purposes of the Low-Income
Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) under
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 42
published on October 3, 2014 at 79 FR
59855 and amended December 17, 2015
at 80 FR 78749 in areas approved for
Federal disaster-related individual
assistance under the Stafford Act. This
Notice extends from 730 days to 850
days the period for which the 2015 lists
of QCTs and DDAs are effective for
projects located in an area that was
approved for individual assistance
under the Stafford Act in 2017, not on
subsequent lists of DDAs or QCTs; and
submitted applications while the area
was a 2015 QCT or DDA.
SUMMARY:
For
questions on how areas are designated
and on geographic definitions, contact
Michael K. Hollar, Senior Economist,
Economic Development and Public
Finance Division, Office of Policy
Development and Research, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street SW., Room 8234,
Washington, DC 20410–6000; telephone
number (202) 402–5878, or send an
email to Michael.K.Hollar@hud.gov. For
specific legal questions, contact Branch
5, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel,
Passthroughs and Special Industries,
Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20224; telephone number (202) 317–
4137, fax number (855) 591–7867.
(These are not toll-free telephone
numbers.) Additional copies of this
notice are available through HUD User
at (800) 245–2691 for a small fee to
cover duplication and mailing costs.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
notice and additional information about
DDAs and QCTs are available
electronically on the Internet at https://
www.huduser.org/datasets/qct.html.
COPIES AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Oct 25, 2017
Jkt 244001
This notice extends from 730 days to
850 days the period for which the 2015
lists of QCTs and DDAs are effective for
projects located in areas approved for
federal individual assistance under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act)
(42 U.S.C. 5170, et al.) due to a
Presidentially-declared natural disaster
in 2017 (hereafter, ‘‘declared counties’’)
and were not in areas on subsequent
lists of DDAs or QCTs but submitted
applications while the area was a 2015
QCT or DDA. DDAs and QCTs for 2016
were published on November 24, 2015
at 80 FR 73201. DDAs and QCTs for
2017 were published on October 17,
2016 at 81 FR 71523. DDAs and QCTs
for 2018 were published on September
11, 2017 at 82 FR 42694. This applies
to declared counties in each of the 50
states, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the
Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. The actual designations
of 2015 QCTs and DDAs are not affected
by this notice. HUD is revising the
effective date of the 2015 QCTs and
DDAs in declared counties at this time
to aid the ability of areas affected by
natural disasters to place in service
affordable housing.
For LIHTC and bond-financed
projects located in declared counties,
the sections entitled ‘‘Effective Date’’
and ‘‘Interpretive Examples of Effective
Date’’ of the 2015 DDA and QCT
designations as published October 3,
2014 at 79 FR 59855 and December 17,
2015 at 80 FR78749 are hereby revised
to read as follows:
Effective Date
The 2015 lists of QCTs and DDAs are
effective:
(1) For allocations of credit after
December 31, 2014; or
(2) For purposes of IRC section
42(h)(4), if the bonds are issued and the
building is placed in service after
December 31, 2014.
If an area is not on a subsequent list
of DDAs, the 2015 lists are effective for
the area if:
(1) The allocation of credit to an
applicant is made no later than the end
of the 850-day period after the applicant
submits a complete application to the
LIHTC-allocating agency, and the
submission is made before the effective
date of the subsequent lists; or
(2) For purposes of IRC section
42(h)(4), if:
(a) The bonds are issued or the
building is placed in service no later
than the end of the 850-day period after
the applicant submits a complete
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49653
application to the bond-issuing agency,
and
(b) The submission is made before the
effective date of the subsequent lists,
provided that both the issuance of the
bonds and the placement in service of
the building occur after the application
is submitted.
An application is deemed to be
submitted on the date it is filed if the
application is determined to be
complete by the credit-allocating or
bond-issuing agency. A ‘‘complete
application’’ means that no more than
de minimis clarification of the
application is required for the agency to
make a decision about the allocation of
tax credits or issuance of bonds
requested in the application.
In the case of a ‘‘multiphase project,’’
the DDA or QCT status of the site of the
project that applies for all phases of the
project is that which applied when the
project received its first allocation of
LIHTC. For purposes of IRC section
42(h)(4), the DDA or QCT status of the
site of the project that applies for all
phases of the project is that which
applied when the first of the following
occurred: (a) The building(s) in the first
phase were placed in service, or (b) the
bonds were issued.
For purposes of this notice, a
‘‘multiphase project’’ is defined as a set
of buildings to be constructed or
rehabilitated under the rules of the
LIHTC and meeting the following
criteria:
(1) The multiphase composition of the
project (i.e., total number of buildings
and phases in project, with a
description of how many buildings are
to be built in each phase and when each
phase is to be completed, and any other
information required by the agency) is
made known by the applicant in the
first application of credit for any
building in the project, and that
applicant identifies the buildings in the
project for which credit is (or will be)
sought;
(2) The aggregate amount of LIHTC
applied for on behalf of, or that would
eventually be allocated to, the buildings
on the site exceeds the one-year
limitation on credits per applicant, as
defined in the Qualified Allocation Plan
(QAP) of the LIHTC-allocating agency,
or the annual per-capita credit authority
of the LIHTC allocating agency, and is
the reason the applicant must request
multiple allocations over two or more
years; and
(3) All applications for LIHTC for
buildings on the site are made in
immediately consecutive years.
Members of the public are hereby
reminded that the Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development, or the
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
49654
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2017 / Notices
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Secretary’s designee, has legal authority
to designate DDAs and QCTs, in
accordance with 26 U.S.C. 42(d)(5), by
publishing lists of geographic entities as
defined by, in the case of DDAs, the
Census Bureau, the several states and
the governments of the insular areas of
the United States and, in the case of
QCTs, by the Census Bureau; and to
establish the effective dates of such lists.
The Secretary of the Treasury, through
the IRS thereof, has sole legal authority
to interpret, and to determine and
enforce compliance with the IRC and
associated regulations, including
Federal Register notices published by
HUD for purposes of designating DDAs
and QCTs. Representations made by any
other entity as to the content of HUD
notices designating DDAs and QCTs that
do not precisely match the language
published by HUD should not be relied
upon by taxpayers in determining what
actions are necessary to comply with
HUD notices.
Interpretive Examples of Effective Date
For the convenience of readers of this
notice, interpretive examples are
provided below to illustrate the
consequences of the effective date in
areas that gain or lose DDA status. The
examples covering DDAs are equally
applicable to QCT designations.
(Case A) Project A is located in a 2015
DDA that is NOT a designated DDA in
2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a declared
county. A complete application for tax
credits for Project A is filed with the
allocating agency on November 15,
2015. Credits are allocated to Project A
on January 30, 2018. Project A is eligible
for the increase in basis accorded a
project in a 2015 DDA because the
application was filed BEFORE January
1, 2016 (the effective date for the 2016
DDA lists), and because tax credits were
allocated no later than the end of the
850-day period after the filing of the
complete application for an allocation of
tax credits.
(Case B) Project B is located in a 2015
DDA that is NOT a designated DDA in
2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a declared
county. A complete application for tax
credits for Project B is filed with the
allocating agency on December 1, 2015.
Credits are allocated to Project B on
June 30, 2018. Project B is NOT eligible
for the increase in basis accorded a
project in a 2015 DDA because, although
the application for an allocation of tax
credits was filed BEFORE January 1,
2016 (the effective date of the 2016 DDA
lists), the tax credits were allocated later
than the end of the 850-day period after
the filing of the complete application.
(Case C) Project C is located in a 2015
DDA that was not a DDA in 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Oct 25, 2017
Jkt 244001
Project C was placed in service on
November 15, 2014. A complete
application for tax-exempt bond
financing for Project C is filed with the
bond-issuing agency on January 15,
2015. The bonds that will support the
permanent financing of Project C are
issued on September 30, 2015. Project C
is NOT eligible for the increase in basis
otherwise accorded a project in a 2015
DDA, because the project was placed in
service BEFORE January 1, 2015.
(Case D) Project D is located in an area
that is a DDA in 2015, but is NOT a DDA
in 2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a
declared county. A complete
application for tax-exempt bond
financing for Project D is filed with the
bond-issuing agency on October 30,
2015. Bonds are issued for Project D on
January 30, 2018, but Project D is not
placed in service until July 30, 2018.
Project D is eligible for the increase in
basis available to projects located in
2015 DDAs because: (1) One of the two
events necessary for triggering the
effective date for buildings described in
Section 42(h)(4)(B) of the IRC (the two
events being bonds issued and buildings
placed in service) took place on January
30, 2018, within the 850-day period
after a complete application for taxexempt bond financing was filed, (2) the
application was filed during a time
when the location of Project D was in a
DDA, and (3) both the issuance of the
bonds and placement in service of
Project D occurred after the application
was submitted.
Findings and Certifications
A. Environmental Impact
This notice involves the
establishment of fiscal requirements or
procedures that are related to rate and
cost determinations and do not
constitute a development decision
affecting the physical condition of
specific project areas or building sites.
Accordingly, under 40 CFR 1508.4 of
the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6) of HUD’s regulations, this
notice is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
B. Federalism Impact
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any policy document that
has federalism implications if the
document either imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on state and
local governments and is not required
by statute, or the document preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the executive order. This
notice merely designates DDAs as
required under IRC Section 42, as
amended, for the use by political
subdivisions of the states in allocating
the LIHTC. As a result, this notice is not
subject to review under the order.
Dated: October 19, 2017.
Kurt G. Usowski,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–23306 Filed 10–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming; Tribal-State Class III
Gaming Compact Taking Effect in the
State of New Mexico
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The notice announces that the
Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact
between the Pueblo of Pojoaque and
State of New Mexico is taking effect.
DATES: This notice is applicable as of
October 26, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. As required by IGRA
and 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts are
subject to review and approval by the
Secretary. The Secretary took no action
on the compact between the Pueblo of
Pojoaque and the State of New Mexico
within 45 days of its submission.
Therefore, the Compact is considered to
have been approved, but only to the
extent the Compact is consistent with
IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).
SUMMARY:
Dated: October 23, 2017.
Gavin Clarkson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Policy and
Economic Development—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–23343 Filed 10–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49653-49654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23306]
[[Page 49653]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5815-N-03]
Statutorily Mandated Designation of Difficult Development Areas
and Qualified Census Tracts: Revision of Effective Date for 2015
Designations
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and
Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document revises the effective date for designations of
``Difficult Development Areas'' (DDAs) and ``Qualified Census Tracts''
(QCTs) for purposes of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) under
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 42 published on October 3, 2014 at
79 FR 59855 and amended December 17, 2015 at 80 FR 78749 in areas
approved for Federal disaster-related individual assistance under the
Stafford Act. This Notice extends from 730 days to 850 days the period
for which the 2015 lists of QCTs and DDAs are effective for projects
located in an area that was approved for individual assistance under
the Stafford Act in 2017, not on subsequent lists of DDAs or QCTs; and
submitted applications while the area was a 2015 QCT or DDA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on how areas are
designated and on geographic definitions, contact Michael K. Hollar,
Senior Economist, Economic Development and Public Finance Division,
Office of Policy Development and Research, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 8234, Washington, DC
20410-6000; telephone number (202) 402-5878, or send an email to
[email protected]. For specific legal questions, contact Branch
5, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel, Passthroughs and Special
Industries, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20224; telephone number (202) 317-4137, fax number (855)
591-7867. (These are not toll-free telephone numbers.) Additional
copies of this notice are available through HUD User at (800) 245-2691
for a small fee to cover duplication and mailing costs.
COPIES AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY: This notice and additional
information about DDAs and QCTs are available electronically on the
Internet at https://www.huduser.org/datasets/qct.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This Notice
This notice extends from 730 days to 850 days the period for which
the 2015 lists of QCTs and DDAs are effective for projects located in
areas approved for federal individual assistance under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act)
(42 U.S.C. 5170, et al.) due to a Presidentially-declared natural
disaster in 2017 (hereafter, ``declared counties'') and were not in
areas on subsequent lists of DDAs or QCTs but submitted applications
while the area was a 2015 QCT or DDA. DDAs and QCTs for 2016 were
published on November 24, 2015 at 80 FR 73201. DDAs and QCTs for 2017
were published on October 17, 2016 at 81 FR 71523. DDAs and QCTs for
2018 were published on September 11, 2017 at 82 FR 42694. This applies
to declared counties in each of the 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The actual designations of 2015
QCTs and DDAs are not affected by this notice. HUD is revising the
effective date of the 2015 QCTs and DDAs in declared counties at this
time to aid the ability of areas affected by natural disasters to place
in service affordable housing.
For LIHTC and bond-financed projects located in declared counties,
the sections entitled ``Effective Date'' and ``Interpretive Examples of
Effective Date'' of the 2015 DDA and QCT designations as published
October 3, 2014 at 79 FR 59855 and December 17, 2015 at 80 FR78749 are
hereby revised to read as follows:
Effective Date
The 2015 lists of QCTs and DDAs are effective:
(1) For allocations of credit after December 31, 2014; or
(2) For purposes of IRC section 42(h)(4), if the bonds are issued
and the building is placed in service after December 31, 2014.
If an area is not on a subsequent list of DDAs, the 2015 lists are
effective for the area if:
(1) The allocation of credit to an applicant is made no later than
the end of the 850-day period after the applicant submits a complete
application to the LIHTC-allocating agency, and the submission is made
before the effective date of the subsequent lists; or
(2) For purposes of IRC section 42(h)(4), if:
(a) The bonds are issued or the building is placed in service no
later than the end of the 850-day period after the applicant submits a
complete application to the bond-issuing agency, and
(b) The submission is made before the effective date of the
subsequent lists, provided that both the issuance of the bonds and the
placement in service of the building occur after the application is
submitted.
An application is deemed to be submitted on the date it is filed if
the application is determined to be complete by the credit-allocating
or bond-issuing agency. A ``complete application'' means that no more
than de minimis clarification of the application is required for the
agency to make a decision about the allocation of tax credits or
issuance of bonds requested in the application.
In the case of a ``multiphase project,'' the DDA or QCT status of
the site of the project that applies for all phases of the project is
that which applied when the project received its first allocation of
LIHTC. For purposes of IRC section 42(h)(4), the DDA or QCT status of
the site of the project that applies for all phases of the project is
that which applied when the first of the following occurred: (a) The
building(s) in the first phase were placed in service, or (b) the bonds
were issued.
For purposes of this notice, a ``multiphase project'' is defined as
a set of buildings to be constructed or rehabilitated under the rules
of the LIHTC and meeting the following criteria:
(1) The multiphase composition of the project (i.e., total number
of buildings and phases in project, with a description of how many
buildings are to be built in each phase and when each phase is to be
completed, and any other information required by the agency) is made
known by the applicant in the first application of credit for any
building in the project, and that applicant identifies the buildings in
the project for which credit is (or will be) sought;
(2) The aggregate amount of LIHTC applied for on behalf of, or that
would eventually be allocated to, the buildings on the site exceeds the
one-year limitation on credits per applicant, as defined in the
Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) of the LIHTC-allocating agency, or the
annual per-capita credit authority of the LIHTC allocating agency, and
is the reason the applicant must request multiple allocations over two
or more years; and
(3) All applications for LIHTC for buildings on the site are made
in immediately consecutive years.
Members of the public are hereby reminded that the Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development, or the
[[Page 49654]]
Secretary's designee, has legal authority to designate DDAs and QCTs,
in accordance with 26 U.S.C. 42(d)(5), by publishing lists of
geographic entities as defined by, in the case of DDAs, the Census
Bureau, the several states and the governments of the insular areas of
the United States and, in the case of QCTs, by the Census Bureau; and
to establish the effective dates of such lists. The Secretary of the
Treasury, through the IRS thereof, has sole legal authority to
interpret, and to determine and enforce compliance with the IRC and
associated regulations, including Federal Register notices published by
HUD for purposes of designating DDAs and QCTs. Representations made by
any other entity as to the content of HUD notices designating DDAs and
QCTs that do not precisely match the language published by HUD should
not be relied upon by taxpayers in determining what actions are
necessary to comply with HUD notices.
Interpretive Examples of Effective Date
For the convenience of readers of this notice, interpretive
examples are provided below to illustrate the consequences of the
effective date in areas that gain or lose DDA status. The examples
covering DDAs are equally applicable to QCT designations.
(Case A) Project A is located in a 2015 DDA that is NOT a
designated DDA in 2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a declared county. A
complete application for tax credits for Project A is filed with the
allocating agency on November 15, 2015. Credits are allocated to
Project A on January 30, 2018. Project A is eligible for the increase
in basis accorded a project in a 2015 DDA because the application was
filed BEFORE January 1, 2016 (the effective date for the 2016 DDA
lists), and because tax credits were allocated no later than the end of
the 850-day period after the filing of the complete application for an
allocation of tax credits.
(Case B) Project B is located in a 2015 DDA that is NOT a
designated DDA in 2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a declared county. A
complete application for tax credits for Project B is filed with the
allocating agency on December 1, 2015. Credits are allocated to Project
B on June 30, 2018. Project B is NOT eligible for the increase in basis
accorded a project in a 2015 DDA because, although the application for
an allocation of tax credits was filed BEFORE January 1, 2016 (the
effective date of the 2016 DDA lists), the tax credits were allocated
later than the end of the 850-day period after the filing of the
complete application.
(Case C) Project C is located in a 2015 DDA that was not a DDA in
2014. Project C was placed in service on November 15, 2014. A complete
application for tax-exempt bond financing for Project C is filed with
the bond-issuing agency on January 15, 2015. The bonds that will
support the permanent financing of Project C are issued on September
30, 2015. Project C is NOT eligible for the increase in basis otherwise
accorded a project in a 2015 DDA, because the project was placed in
service BEFORE January 1, 2015.
(Case D) Project D is located in an area that is a DDA in 2015, but
is NOT a DDA in 2016, 2017, or 2018 and is in a declared county. A
complete application for tax-exempt bond financing for Project D is
filed with the bond-issuing agency on October 30, 2015. Bonds are
issued for Project D on January 30, 2018, but Project D is not placed
in service until July 30, 2018. Project D is eligible for the increase
in basis available to projects located in 2015 DDAs because: (1) One of
the two events necessary for triggering the effective date for
buildings described in Section 42(h)(4)(B) of the IRC (the two events
being bonds issued and buildings placed in service) took place on
January 30, 2018, within the 850-day period after a complete
application for tax-exempt bond financing was filed, (2) the
application was filed during a time when the location of Project D was
in a DDA, and (3) both the issuance of the bonds and placement in
service of Project D occurred after the application was submitted.
Findings and Certifications
A. Environmental Impact
This notice involves the establishment of fiscal requirements or
procedures that are related to rate and cost determinations and do not
constitute a development decision affecting the physical condition of
specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 40 CFR
1508.4 of the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality and
24 CFR 50.19(c)(6) of HUD's regulations, this notice is categorically
excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
B. Federalism Impact
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any policy document that has federalism implications if
the document either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments and is not required by statute, or the
document preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation
and funding requirements of section 6 of the executive order. This
notice merely designates DDAs as required under IRC Section 42, as
amended, for the use by political subdivisions of the states in
allocating the LIHTC. As a result, this notice is not subject to review
under the order.
Dated: October 19, 2017.
Kurt G. Usowski,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-23306 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P