30 Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection for Public Comment on the: Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency Service Coordinator (ROSS-SC) Program Evaluation, 49411-49413 [2017-23188]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Philip S. Kaplan, Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528–0655.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5997–N–66]
For
general questions, please contact:
William Holzerland, (202) 212–7719,
Senior Director for Information
Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472. For privacy
questions, please contact: Philip S.
Kaplan, (202) 343–1717, Chief Privacy
Officer, Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528–0655.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pursuant
to the provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and as part of its
ongoing integration and management
efforts, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
rescinding the system of records notice,
‘‘Letter of Map Amendment System
(LOMA), DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA–1’’,
which covered applicants who were
seeking a letter of map amendment as
part of FEMA’s National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Letter of Map
Amendment (LOMA) system.
FEMA will continue to collect and
maintain records regarding FEMA’s
Letters of Map Amendments and will
rely upon the newly-created FEMA
system of records notice titled ‘‘DHS/
FEMA–014 Hazard Mitigation Planning
and Flood Mapping Products and
Services System of Records’’ that is also
published in this issue of the Federal
Register.
Eliminating this system of records
notice will have no adverse impacts on
individuals, but will promote the
overall streamlining and management of
DHS Privacy Act record systems.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
System Name and Number:
‘‘Letter of Map Amendment System
(LOMA), DHS/FEMA/NFIP/LOMA–1.’’
HISTORY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
71 FR 7990 (Feb. 15, 2006).
Philip S. Kaplan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2017–23204 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–17–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
30 Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for Public Comment on the:
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Service Coordinator
(ROSS–SC) Program Evaluation
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments Due Date: November
24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806, Email:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email
Anna Guido at Anna.Guido@hud.gov or
telephone 202–402–5535. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339. This is not a
toll-free number. Copies of available
documents submitted to OMB may be
obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for
approval of the information collection
described in Section A. The Federal
Register notice that solicited public
comment on the information collection
for a Period of 60 days was published
on January 9, 2017 at 82 FR 2390.
DATES:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Service Coordinator (ROSS–
SC) Program Evaluation.
OMB Approval Number: 2528–New.
Type of Request: New.
Form Number: No forms.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49411
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: HUD is
conducting this study under contract
with the Urban Institute and its
subcontractors (EJP Consulting). The
project is an evaluation of the Resident
Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency
Service Coordinator (ROSS–SC)
program operated by grantees across the
country. It will include a national webbased survey and in-person site visits to
select grantees. Since 2008, the ROSS–
SC program has provided information
and referral for families, elderly, and
disabled residents in public housing by
funding local Service Coordinators to
link residents to resources that they
need to become independent and selfsufficient. The purpose of the program
is to leverage existing local public and
private services to increase income,
reduce or eliminate welfare assistance,
work towards economic independence
and housing self-sufficiency, and
improve living conditions and ability to
age in-place for elderly and disabled
residents. To date, there has been no
HUD-funded evaluation of this program.
A GAO study across several HUD selfsufficiency programs published in 2013
found that the ROSS–SC program lacked
enough quality data on participation
and outcomes ‘‘to determine whether it
was meeting goals of the effective and
efficient use of resources’’ in improving
resident self-sufficiency and
independence. They recommended
improving the data reporting process
and developing a strategy for regularly
analyzing ROSS–SC participation and
outcome data. This project helps
implement GAO’s recommendations by:
(1) Assessing improvements in program
processes and reporting since changes
were made to the program’s logic model
in FY 2014; (2) examining the breadth
and depth of ROSS–SC program
implementation by current service
coordinators across all grantee types;
and (3) analyzing current reporting
requirements and performance metrics
to improve future program outcome
evaluation. To do so, this study will use
a full population survey of current
service coordinators funded through
ROSS–SC grants made in FY 2013, FY
2014, and FY 2015, and site visits to
select grantees.
A web-based survey will allow the
study team to investigate important
Service Coordinator (SC) program
characteristics not included in grant
applications or current reporting tools,
in order to provide generalizable
evidence on the ‘‘effective and efficient
use of resources’’ across all ROSS–SC
service coordinators. These include SC
qualifications and experience, program
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
49412
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
management structure, resident intake
and assessment processes, services
offered, partnerships utilized and
leveraged, and case management data
systems and outcome evaluation tools
used to track participant activities and
outcomes. Since there is no centralized
database of service coordinator contact
information, this must first be obtained
through a brief online survey sent to
each grantee contact person.
Site visits to seven high-performing
grantees will include onsite
observations and interviews with
grantees, service coordinators, and
program partners, as well as focus
groups with program participants to
gather context-specific data on both
program processes and outcomes to aid
in identifying best practices and
common challenges across grantees.
per response by using the most recent
(May 2016) Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment Statistics
median hourly wage for the labor
category, Chief Executives (11–1011):
$87.12.
Whereas ROSS–SC service
coordinators and other grantee staff and
service partners have a range of
experience and skills, we averaged the
median hourly wage for two labor
categories: The Social and Community
Service Manager (11–9151) median
hourly wage of $31.10, and the
Community and Social Service
Specialists, All Other (21–1099)
category with a rate of $20.73.
This produces an average of both
median hourly wage rates equal to
$25.92.
Respondents: For the survey, 330
grantee contact persons and 840 service
coordinators (assumes 70% response
rate from total estimated population of
1200) at 7 grantee site visit locations, 56
staff and partners, and 107 public
housing residents.
Estimated total number of hours
needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents, frequency of response,
hours of response, and cost of response
time: Based on the below assumptions
and tables, we calculate the total burden
hours for this study to be 1,244.50 hours
and the total cost to be $32,856.28.
Whereas many ROSS–SC grantee
contact persons in HUD’s database are a
PHA Executive Director, PHA Division
Director, or the Chief Executive Officer
of the grantee, we estimated their cost
Respondent
Occupation
SOC code
Grantee Contact Person .................................
ROSS Service Coordinator & Partners ..........
Chief Executive ..............................................
Social and Community Services Manager .....
Community and Social Service Specialist, All
Other.
11–1011
11–9151
21–1099
Median hourly
wage rate
$87.12
$31.10
$20.73
Average
(median)
hourly wage
rate
$87.12
$25.92
........................
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics (May 2016), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm
Hourly costs for public housing
resident focus group participants were
estimated using FY 2016 HUD 30%
Income Limit for All Areas calculations
from the Office of Policy Development
and Research through HUD’s Web site
located at https://www.huduser.gov/
portal/datasets/il/il16/. This
identifies income limits by county for
extremely low income households
earning at or below 30% of their county
median income. These limits are
adjusted by household sizes of up to
eight household members. We averaged
the county median values to produce a
national average median income by
Number of
respondents
Information collection
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Grantee Contact Person Survey ..............
Service Coordinators Survey ...................
ROSS Site Visit—Staff and Partners .......
HUD Residents living alone .....................
HUD Residents in 2-person household ...
HUD Residents in 3-person household ...
HUD Residents in 4-person household ...
HUD Residents in 5-person household ...
Frequency of
response
330.00
Burden hour
per response
• 30% will reside in a 4-person
household (31 respondents) with an
average median income of $19,305.
• 10% will reside in a 5-person
household (11 respondents) with an
average median income of $20,872.
To produce a basic hourly rate, we
divide the average median annual
income amount by 2,080 work hours per
year, equaling 40 hours per week for
each of the 52 weeks out of the year.
All assumptions are reflected in the
table below.
Annual burden
hours
Hourly cost
per response
Total cost
56.00
21.00
11.00
31.00
31.00
11.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
82.50
840.00
112.00
42.00
22.00
62.00
62.00
22.00
$87.12
25.92
25.92
6.51
7.43
8.36
9.28
10.03
$7,187.40
21,772.80
2,903.04
273.42
163.46
518.32
575.36
220.66
1,331.00
........................
........................
1,244.50
........................
33,614.46
1 840.00
Total ..................................................
1 The
household size for extremely low
income households. Based on the
ROSS–SC program emphasis on
increasing family self-sufficiency, and
independent living and aging in place
for the elderly and disabled, we estimate
that:
• 20% of potential respondents will
live alone (21 respondents) with an
average median income of $13,537.
• 10% will reside in a 2-person
household (11 respondents) with an
average median income of $15,464.
• 30% will reside in a 3-person
household (31 respondents) with an
average median income of $17,396.
full population is estimated at 1,200 service coordinators. The number of respondents is based on anticipated response rate of 70%.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 25, 2017 / Notices
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–23188 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5997–N–69]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Congressional Earmarks
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
SUMMARY:
49413
OMB Approval Number: 2506–0179.
Type of Request: Reinstatement with
change of a previously approved
collection.
Form Number: SF–424.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
Department’s Office of Policy
Development and Coordination
administers congressionally mandated
grants, known as earmarks. These
projects have been identified in the
annual appropriation of funds to the
Department and in the accompanying
conference reports or congressional
record accompanying each
appropriation. Earmarks generally fall
into two categories: Economic
Development Initiative-Special Project
(EDI–SP) and Neighborhood Initiative
(NI) grants.
HUD’s Office of Policy Development
and Coordination and its Environmental
Officers in the field use this information
to make funds available to entities
directed to receive funds appropriated
by Congress. This information is used to
collect, receive, review and monitor
program activities through applications,
semi-annual reports, and close out
reports. The information that is
collected is used to assess performance.
Grantees are units of state and local
government, nonprofits and Indian
tribes. Respondents are initially
identified by congress and generally fall
into two categories: Economic
Development Initiative-Special Project
(EDI–SP) grantees and Neighborhood
Initiative (NI) grantees. The agency has
used the application, semi-annual
reports and close out reports to track
grantee performance in the
implementation of approved projects.
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: November
24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax:202–395–5806, Email:
OIRA Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email
Anna P. Guido at Anna.P.Guido@
hud.gov or telephone 202–402–5535.
This is not a toll-free number. Person
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339. Copies of
available documents submitted to OMB
may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on June 16, 2017 at
81 FR 27719.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Congressional Earmark.
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
response
Responses
per annum
Burden hour
per response
Annual burden
hours
Hourly cost
per response
Annual cost
SF–425 .........................
450.00
2.00
900.00
.50
450.00
$33.06
$14,877.00
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:06 Oct 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond; including through the use of
appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Authority: Authority: Section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–23185 Filed 10–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49411-49413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23188]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5997-N-66]
30 Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection for Public
Comment on the: Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency Service
Coordinator (ROSS-SC) Program Evaluation
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: November 24, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; fax: 202-395-5806, Email: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Anna Guido at
[email protected] or telephone 202-402-5535. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. This is not a toll-
free number. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be
obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for approval of the information collection
described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited
public comment on the information collection for a Period of 60 days
was published on January 9, 2017 at 82 FR 2390.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Resident Opportunity and Self-
Sufficiency Service Coordinator (ROSS-SC) Program Evaluation.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request: New.
Form Number: No forms.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: HUD
is conducting this study under contract with the Urban Institute and
its subcontractors (EJP Consulting). The project is an evaluation of
the Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency Service Coordinator
(ROSS-SC) program operated by grantees across the country. It will
include a national web-based survey and in-person site visits to select
grantees. Since 2008, the ROSS-SC program has provided information and
referral for families, elderly, and disabled residents in public
housing by funding local Service Coordinators to link residents to
resources that they need to become independent and self-sufficient. The
purpose of the program is to leverage existing local public and private
services to increase income, reduce or eliminate welfare assistance,
work towards economic independence and housing self-sufficiency, and
improve living conditions and ability to age in-place for elderly and
disabled residents. To date, there has been no HUD-funded evaluation of
this program. A GAO study across several HUD self-sufficiency programs
published in 2013 found that the ROSS-SC program lacked enough quality
data on participation and outcomes ``to determine whether it was
meeting goals of the effective and efficient use of resources'' in
improving resident self-sufficiency and independence. They recommended
improving the data reporting process and developing a strategy for
regularly analyzing ROSS-SC participation and outcome data. This
project helps implement GAO's recommendations by: (1) Assessing
improvements in program processes and reporting since changes were made
to the program's logic model in FY 2014; (2) examining the breadth and
depth of ROSS-SC program implementation by current service coordinators
across all grantee types; and (3) analyzing current reporting
requirements and performance metrics to improve future program outcome
evaluation. To do so, this study will use a full population survey of
current service coordinators funded through ROSS-SC grants made in FY
2013, FY 2014, and FY 2015, and site visits to select grantees.
A web-based survey will allow the study team to investigate
important Service Coordinator (SC) program characteristics not included
in grant applications or current reporting tools, in order to provide
generalizable evidence on the ``effective and efficient use of
resources'' across all ROSS-SC service coordinators. These include SC
qualifications and experience, program
[[Page 49412]]
management structure, resident intake and assessment processes,
services offered, partnerships utilized and leveraged, and case
management data systems and outcome evaluation tools used to track
participant activities and outcomes. Since there is no centralized
database of service coordinator contact information, this must first be
obtained through a brief online survey sent to each grantee contact
person.
Site visits to seven high-performing grantees will include onsite
observations and interviews with grantees, service coordinators, and
program partners, as well as focus groups with program participants to
gather context-specific data on both program processes and outcomes to
aid in identifying best practices and common challenges across
grantees.
Respondents: For the survey, 330 grantee contact persons and 840
service coordinators (assumes 70% response rate from total estimated
population of 1200) at 7 grantee site visit locations, 56 staff and
partners, and 107 public housing residents.
Estimated total number of hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of respondents, frequency of response,
hours of response, and cost of response time: Based on the below
assumptions and tables, we calculate the total burden hours for this
study to be 1,244.50 hours and the total cost to be $32,856.28.
Whereas many ROSS-SC grantee contact persons in HUD's database are
a PHA Executive Director, PHA Division Director, or the Chief Executive
Officer of the grantee, we estimated their cost per response by using
the most recent (May 2016) Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational
Employment Statistics median hourly wage for the labor category, Chief
Executives (11-1011): $87.12.
Whereas ROSS-SC service coordinators and other grantee staff and
service partners have a range of experience and skills, we averaged the
median hourly wage for two labor categories: The Social and Community
Service Manager (11-9151) median hourly wage of $31.10, and the
Community and Social Service Specialists, All Other (21-1099) category
with a rate of $20.73.
This produces an average of both median hourly wage rates equal to
$25.92.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Median hourly (median)
Respondent Occupation SOC code wage rate hourly wage
rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grantee Contact Person................ Chief Executive......... 11-1011 $87.12 $87.12
ROSS Service Coordinator & Partners... Social and Community 11-9151 $31.10 $25.92
Services Manager.
Community and Social 21-1099 $20.73 ..............
Service Specialist, All
Other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics (May 2016), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm
Hourly costs for public housing resident focus group participants
were estimated using FY 2016 HUD 30% Income Limit for All Areas
calculations from the Office of Policy Development and Research through
HUD's Web site located at https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il/il16/. This identifies income limits by county for extremely
low income households earning at or below 30% of their county median
income. These limits are adjusted by household sizes of up to eight
household members. We averaged the county median values to produce a
national average median income by household size for extremely low
income households. Based on the ROSS-SC program emphasis on increasing
family self-sufficiency, and independent living and aging in place for
the elderly and disabled, we estimate that:
20% of potential respondents will live alone (21
respondents) with an average median income of $13,537.
10% will reside in a 2-person household (11 respondents)
with an average median income of $15,464.
30% will reside in a 3-person household (31 respondents)
with an average median income of $17,396.
30% will reside in a 4-person household (31 respondents)
with an average median income of $19,305.
10% will reside in a 5-person household (11 respondents)
with an average median income of $20,872.
To produce a basic hourly rate, we divide the average median annual
income amount by 2,080 work hours per year, equaling 40 hours per week
for each of the 52 weeks out of the year.
All assumptions are reflected in the table below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost
Information collection respondents response per response hours per response Total cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grantee Contact Person Survey........................... 330.00 1.00 0.25 82.50 $87.12 $7,187.40
Service Coordinators Survey............................. \1\ 840.00 1.00 1.00 840.00 25.92 21,772.80
ROSS Site Visit--Staff and Partners..................... 56.00 1.00 2.00 112.00 25.92 2,903.04
HUD Residents living alone.............................. 21.00 1.00 2.00 42.00 6.51 273.42
HUD Residents in 2-person household..................... 11.00 1.00 2.00 22.00 7.43 163.46
HUD Residents in 3-person household..................... 31.00 1.00 2.00 62.00 8.36 518.32
HUD Residents in 4-person household..................... 31.00 1.00 2.00 62.00 9.28 575.36
HUD Residents in 5-person household..................... 11.00 1.00 2.00 22.00 10.03 220.66
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 1,331.00 .............. .............. 1,244.50 .............. 33,614.46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The full population is estimated at 1,200 service coordinators. The number of respondents is based on anticipated response rate of 70%.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of
[[Page 49413]]
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-23188 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
