Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation System, 49029-49031 [2017-22897]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
Patent No. 7,288,097 from Abbott
Vascular Inc., and U.S. Patent No.
7,464,712, from The Trustees of
Columbia University in the City of New
York), and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining the patents’
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated November 2, 2015, FDA
advised the USPTO that this medical
device had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
MITRACLIP CDS represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
MITRACLIP CDS is 3,846 days. Of this
time, 2,515 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review
period, while 1,331 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device
became effective: April 16, 2003. FDA
has verified the applicants’ claims that
the date the investigational device
exemption required under section
520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests
to begin became effective was April 16,
2003.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): March 4, 2010.
The applicants claim March 30, 2009, as
the date the premarket approval
application (PMA) for MITRACLIP CDS
(PMA P100009) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that the
PMA submitted on March 30, 2009, was
incomplete. The complete PMA was
submitted on March 4, 2010, which is
considered to be the PMA initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 24, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicants’ claims that PMA
P100009 was approved on October 24,
2013.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In the applications for patent extension,
the applicants seek 1,827 days or 1,721
days of patent term extension.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–22895 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–E–3529]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; Inspire Upper Airway
Stimulation System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation
System (Inspire UAS System) and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49029
patent which claims that medical
device.
Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by December 22, 2017.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
April 23, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before December 22,
2017. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of December 22, 2017.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
DATES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
49030
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2015–E–3529 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; INSPIRE UAS
SYSTEM.’’ Received comments, those
filed in a timely manner (see
ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of USPTO may award
(half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as
specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
medical device INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM.
INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM is indicated for
treatment of a subset of patients with
moderate to severe obstructive sleep
apnea (apnea-hypopnea index of greater
than or equal to 20 and less than or
equal to 65). Subsequent to this
approval, the USPTO received a patent
term restoration application for INSPIRE
UAS SYSTEM (U.S. Patent No.
6,021,352) from Inspire Medical
Systems, Inc., and the USPTO requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated October 30,
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2015, FDA advised the USPTO that this
medical device had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM is 2,002 days.
Of this time, 1,653 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period, while 349 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device
became effective: November 7, 2008.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational device
exemption required under section
520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests
to begin became effective on November
7, 2008.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): May 17, 2013. The
applicant claims May 1, 2013, as the
date the premarket approval application
(PMA) for INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM (PMA
P130008) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that the
PMA submitted May 1, 2013 was
incomplete. The completed PMA was
then submitted on May 17, 2013, which
is considered to be the initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was
approved: April 30, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that PMA
P130008 was approved on April 30,
2014.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,184 days of patent
term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must be
timely (see DATES), must be filed in
accordance with § 10.20, must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–22897 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2015–E–2660, FDA–
2015–E–2662, FDA–2015–E–2722, and FDA–
2015–E–2965]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; OBIZUR
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for OBIZUR and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of applications to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by December 22, 2017.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
April 23, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before December 22,
2017. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of December 22, 2017.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49031
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket Nos. FDA–
2015–E–2660, FDA–2015–E–2662,
FDA–2015–E–2722, and FDA–2015–E–
2965 for ‘‘Determination of Regulatory
Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; OBIZUR.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49029-49031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-E-3529]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period for Inspire Upper Airway
Stimulation System (Inspire UAS System) and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that medical
device.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by
December 22, 2017. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by April 23,
2018. See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before December 22, 2017. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
midnight Eastern Time at the end of December 22, 2017. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
[[Page 49030]]
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-E-3529 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM.'' Received comments,
those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with Sec. 10.20 (21 CFR 10.20) and
other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's
posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18,
2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the device and continues until
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of USPTO may award (half the testing phase
must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before
the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the medical device INSPIRE UAS
SYSTEM. INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM is indicated for treatment of a subset of
patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-
hypopnea index of greater than or equal to 20 and less than or equal to
65). Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM (U.S. Patent No.
6,021,352) from Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., and the USPTO requested
FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent
term restoration. In a letter dated October 30, 2015, FDA advised the
USPTO that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the
USPTO requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM is 2,002 days. Of this time, 1,653 days occurred
during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 349
days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving
this device became effective: November 7, 2008. FDA has verified the
applicant's claim that the date the investigational device exemption
required under section 520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests to begin
became effective on November 7, 2008.
2. The date an application was initially submitted with respect to
the device under section 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): May 17,
2013. The applicant claims May 1, 2013, as the date the premarket
approval application (PMA) for INSPIRE UAS SYSTEM (PMA P130008) was
initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that the PMA
submitted May 1, 2013 was incomplete. The completed PMA was then
submitted on May 17, 2013, which is considered to be the initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was approved: April 30, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that PMA P130008 was approved on April
30, 2014.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,184 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under
21 CFR 60.24, ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as
specified in Sec. 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may
[[Page 49031]]
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with Sec. 10.20, must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a true and complete
copy of the petition has been served upon the patent applicant. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions
should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22897 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P