Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MITRACLIP CDS, 49027-49029 [2017-22895]
Download as PDF
49027
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2017–22893 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection; Public
Comment Request; Revision of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection (ICR-Rev) (OMB Approval
Number 0985–0004); Maintenance of
Effort for Title III and Extension of, and
Minor Revisions Due to Statutory
Language Changes to the Certification
of Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Program Expenditures
Administration for Community
Living, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Under the PRA, Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
The Administration for Community
Living (ACL) is announcing that the
proposed collection of information
listed above has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance as
required under section 506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
SUMMARY:
(the PRA). This 30-Day notice requests
comments on the information collection
requirements related to the proposed
revision of an existing data collection
regarding the information collection
requirements in the Maintenance of
Effort collection form for all ACL/AoA
Title III Grantees.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by November 22, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the collection of information: By fax
at 202.395.5806 or by email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov, Attn: OMB
Desk Officer for ACL.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jesse Moore at (202) 795–7578 or
Jesse.Moore@acl.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with Section 44 U.S.C.
3507, ACL has submitted the following
proposed collection of information to
OMB for review and clearance. ACL is
requesting approval for three years of an
extension of the currently approved data
collection with modifications.
The Certification of Maintenance of
Effort under Tittle III and Certification
of Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO)
Program Expenditures provide
statutorily required information
regarding each state’s contribution to
programs funded under the Older
Americans Act and compliance with
legislative requirements, pertinent
Federal regulations, and other
applicable instructions and guidelines
issued by ACL.
In addition to renewing OMB
approval of these data collection
instruments, minor changes are being
proposed to the LTCO Expenditures
Number of
respondents
Respondent/data collection activity
Certification and an accompanying
document which provides specific
statutory references related to
Ombudsman program minimum
funding, non-supplanting requirements,
and state authorization to expend Title
III–B funds on Ombudsman activities.
Specifically, changes include making
the reference to the Fiscal Year at the
bottom of the form a fillable field to
allow the date to be changed annually;
listing the ‘‘Administration for
Community Living (ACL)’’ as the
intended recipient of the completed
form; and updating statutory language
references, i.e., Section 306(a)(9), which
is provided on the second page, to
reflect changes made during the 2016
reauthorization of the OAA.
Comments in Response to the 60-Day
Federal Register Notice
A 60-Day notice was published in the
Federal Register in Vol. 82, No. 137, on
June 19, 2017. No comments were
received.
Annual Burden Estimates
ACL estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows: 56
State Agencies on Aging respond
annually, and it takes each agency an
average of one half (1⁄2) hour per State
agency per year to complete each form
for a total of twenty-eight hours for all
state agencies annually. The half hour
estimate is based on prior years’
experience with States in completing
these forms.
The proposed data collection tool may
be found on the ACL Web site for
review at: https://www.acl.gov/aboutacl/public-input.
Responses per
respondent
Hours per response
Annual burden
hours
Certification on Maintenance of Effort under Title III ......................................
Certification of Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Expenditures ...........
56
56
1/year .............
1/year .............
12
12
⁄
⁄
28
28
Total ..........................................................................................................
112
2 .....................
1
56
Dated: October 12, 2017.
Mary Lazare,
Principal Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–22914 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2014–E–2358 and FDA–
2014–E–2359]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MITRACLIP CDS
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Notice.
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for MITRACLIP CDS and is publishing
this notice of that determination as
required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of applications to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that medical
device.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
49028
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by December 22, 2017.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
April 23, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before December 22,
2017. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of December 22, 2017.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket Nos. FDA–
2014–E–2358 and FDA–2014–E–2359
for ‘‘Determination of Regulatory
Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MITRACLIP CDS.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of USPTO may award
(half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as
specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
medical device MITRACLIP CDS.
MITRACLIP CDS is indicated for the
percutaneous reduction of significant
symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR ≥
3+) due to primary abnormality of the
mitral apparatus (degenerative MR) in
patients who have been determined to
be at prohibitive risk for mitral valve
surgery by a heart team, which includes
a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral
valve surgery and a cardiologist
experienced in mitral valve disease, and
in whom existing comorbidities would
not preclude the expected benefit from
reduction of the mitral regurgitation.
Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO
received patent term restoration
applications for MITRACLIP CDS (U.S.
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 203 / Monday, October 23, 2017 / Notices
Patent No. 7,288,097 from Abbott
Vascular Inc., and U.S. Patent No.
7,464,712, from The Trustees of
Columbia University in the City of New
York), and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining the patents’
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated November 2, 2015, FDA
advised the USPTO that this medical
device had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
MITRACLIP CDS represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
MITRACLIP CDS is 3,846 days. Of this
time, 2,515 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review
period, while 1,331 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device
became effective: April 16, 2003. FDA
has verified the applicants’ claims that
the date the investigational device
exemption required under section
520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests
to begin became effective was April 16,
2003.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): March 4, 2010.
The applicants claim March 30, 2009, as
the date the premarket approval
application (PMA) for MITRACLIP CDS
(PMA P100009) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that the
PMA submitted on March 30, 2009, was
incomplete. The complete PMA was
submitted on March 4, 2010, which is
considered to be the PMA initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 24, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicants’ claims that PMA
P100009 was approved on October 24,
2013.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In the applications for patent extension,
the applicants seek 1,827 days or 1,721
days of patent term extension.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Oct 20, 2017
Jkt 244001
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–22895 Filed 10–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–E–3529]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; Inspire Upper Airway
Stimulation System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation
System (Inspire UAS System) and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49029
patent which claims that medical
device.
Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by December 22, 2017.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
April 23, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before December 22,
2017. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of December 22, 2017.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
DATES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\23OCN1.SGM
23OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49027-49029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA-2014-E-2358 and FDA-2014-E-2359]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MITRACLIP CDS
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period for MITRACLIP CDS and is
publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of the submission of applications to
the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that
medical device.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in the
[[Page 49028]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by
December 22, 2017. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by April 23,
2018. See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before December 22, 2017. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
midnight Eastern Time at the end of December 22, 2017. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket Nos.
FDA-2014-E-2358 and FDA-2014-E-2359 for ``Determination of Regulatory
Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MITRACLIP CDS.''
Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with Sec. 10.20 (21 CFR 10.20) and
other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's
posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18,
2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the device and continues until
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of USPTO may award (half the testing phase
must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before
the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the medical device MITRACLIP CDS.
MITRACLIP CDS is indicated for the percutaneous reduction of
significant symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR >= 3+) due to primary
abnormality of the mitral apparatus (degenerative MR) in patients who
have been determined to be at prohibitive risk for mitral valve surgery
by a heart team, which includes a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral
valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in mitral valve disease,
and in whom existing comorbidities would not preclude the expected
benefit from reduction of the mitral regurgitation. Subsequent to this
approval, the USPTO received patent term restoration applications for
MITRACLIP CDS (U.S.
[[Page 49029]]
Patent No. 7,288,097 from Abbott Vascular Inc., and U.S. Patent No.
7,464,712, from The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New
York), and the USPTO requested FDA's assistance in determining the
patents' eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
November 2, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO that this medical device had
undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of MITRACLIP
CDS represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that FDA determine the
product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
MITRACLIP CDS is 3,846 days. Of this time, 2,515 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,331 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving
this device became effective: April 16, 2003. FDA has verified the
applicants' claims that the date the investigational device exemption
required under section 520(g) of the FD&C Act for human tests to begin
became effective was April 16, 2003.
2. The date an application was initially submitted with respect to
the device under section 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): March 4,
2010. The applicants claim March 30, 2009, as the date the premarket
approval application (PMA) for MITRACLIP CDS (PMA P100009) was
initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that the PMA
submitted on March 30, 2009, was incomplete. The complete PMA was
submitted on March 4, 2010, which is considered to be the PMA initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was approved: October 24, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicants' claims that PMA P100009 was approved on
October 24, 2013.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In the applications for patent extension,
the applicants seek 1,827 days or 1,721 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under
21 CFR 60.24, ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as
specified in Sec. 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must comply with all the requirements
of Sec. 60.30, including but not limited to: Must be timely (see
DATES), must be filed in accordance with Sec. 10.20, must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42,
1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: October 17, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-22895 Filed 10-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P