Extension of Comment Period on Draft Documents Related to the Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides, 48507-48508 [2017-22678]
Download as PDF
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices
Accession Number: 20171012–5063.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–62–000.
Applicants: MATL LLP.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Removal of Interconnection-wide
Transmission Planning Process to be
effective 12/12/2017.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5072.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–63–000.
Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Attachment K–2017 NTTG Updates to
be effective 12/12/2017.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5074.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–64–000.
Applicants: Northern Indiana Public
Service Company, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
NIPSCO submits Interconnection
Agreement SA No. 4247 to be effective
7/19/2017.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5075.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–65–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Wholesale Market Participation
Agreement No. 4812; Queue W4–036 to
be effective 9/26/2017.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5093.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–66–000.
Applicants: PacifiCorp.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
OATT Revised Attachment K ?
Eliminate I/C Wide Planning Process to
be effective 12/12/2017.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5100.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Docket Numbers: ER18–67–000.
Applicants: Portland General Electric
Company.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
NTTG Revised Funding Agreement to be
effective 1/1/2018.
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5101.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric securities
filings:
Docket Numbers: ES18–3–000.
Applicants: PacifiCorp.
Description: Application under
Section 204 of the Federal Power Act for
Authorization to Issue Securities of
PacifiCorp.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Oct 17, 2017
Jkt 244001
Filed Date: 10/12/17.
Accession Number: 20171012–5105.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/2/17.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: October 12, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–22527 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0566; FRL–9969–74–
OAR]
Extension of Comment Period on Draft
Documents Related to the Review of
the Primary National Ambient Air
Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of extension of public
comment period.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
a 30-day extension of the comment
period on two draft documents titled,
Risk and Exposure Assessment for the
Review of the Primary National Ambient
Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides,
External Review Draft (draft REA) and
Policy Assessment for the Review of the
Primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Sulfur Oxides, External
Review Draft (draft PA). The EPA is
extending the comment period for an
additional 30 days to provide
stakeholders and the public with
additional time to review these
documents and to prepare meaningful
comments. The original comment
period was to end on October 18, 2017.
The extended comment period will now
close on November 17, 2017.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48507
The comment period for the
document published in the Federal
Register on September 19, 2017 (82 FR
43756) is extended. Comments must be
received on or before November 17,
2017.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2013–0566, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. The draft REA
and draft PA are available via the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/
sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-air-qualitystandards.
ADDRESSES:
Dr.
Nicole Hagan, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (Mail Code
C504–06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541–3153; fax number: (919) 541–
5315; email: hagan.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
48508
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 18, 2017 / Notices
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the notice by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions. The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
CFR part or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternative and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumption and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Information Specific to the
Documents
Two sections of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) govern the establishment and
revision of the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). Section 108
(42 U.S.C. 7408) directs the
Administrator to identify and list
certain air pollutants and then to issue
air quality criteria for those pollutants.
The Administrator is to list those air
pollutants that in his ‘‘judgment, cause
or contribute to air pollution which may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health or welfare’’; ‘‘the presence
of which in the ambient air results from
numerous or diverse mobile or
stationary sources’’; and ‘‘for which . . .
[the Administrator] plans to issue air
quality criteria . . .’’ (42 U.S.C.
7408(a)(1)(A)–(C)). Air quality criteria
are intended to ‘‘accurately reflect the
latest scientific knowledge useful in
indicating the kind and extent of all
identifiable effects on public health or
welfare which may be expected from the
presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient
air . . .’’ (42 U.S.C. 7408(a)(2)). Under
section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), the EPA
establishes primary (health-based) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Oct 17, 2017
Jkt 244001
secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for
pollutants for which air quality criteria
are issued. Section 109(d) requires
periodic review and, if appropriate,
revision of existing air quality criteria.
The revised air quality criteria reflect
advances in scientific knowledge on the
effects of the pollutant on public health
or welfare. The EPA is also required to
periodically review and revise the
NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the
revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2)
requires that an independent scientific
review committee ‘‘shall complete a
review of the criteria . . . and the
national primary and secondary ambient
air quality standards . . . and shall
recommend to the Administrator any
new . . . standards and revisions of the
existing criteria and standards as may be
appropriate . . . .’’ Since the early
1980s, this independent review function
has been performed by the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee
(CASAC).
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the air
quality criteria and primary NAAQS for
sulfur oxides.1 The EPA’s overall plan
for this review is presented in the
Integrated Review Plan for the Primary
NAAQS for Sulfur Dioxide (IRP). The
EPA is currently working to finalize the
Integrated Science Assessment for
Sulfur Oxides—Health Criteria (ISA),
the second draft of which was reviewed
by the CASAC at a public meeting in
March 2017 (82 FR 11449). The Risk
and Exposure Assessment Planning
Document for the Review of the Primary
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Sulfur Oxides (REA
Planning Document) was also reviewed
by the CASAC at this meeting (82 FR
11449). The draft REA and draft PA,
which build on information presented
in these documents, were the subject of
review by the CASAC at a public
meeting on September 18–19, 2017 (82
FR 37213). The EPA will consider
comments received from the CASAC
and the public in preparing revisions to
these documents. The draft REA and PA
documents, and other documents in this
review, referenced above, are available
on the EPA’s Technology Transfer
Network Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2primary-air-quality-standards.
The notice of availability for the draft
REA and draft PA was originally
published on September 19, 2017, with
the public comment period closing on
October 18, 2017 (82 FR 43756). We
received a request from a member of the
public to extend the comment period by
30 days. After considering this request,
1 The indicator for the current standard is sulfur
dioxide.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
we are extending the comment period
and, as described above, it will now
close on November 17, 2017.
Dated: October 11, 2017.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017–22678 Filed 10–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–0812]
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
the Commission) invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection.
Comments are requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The Commission may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. No person shall
be subject to any penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information
subject to the PRA that does not display
a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before November 17,
2017. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts listed below as soon
as possible.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48507-48508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22678]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0566; FRL-9969-74-OAR]
Extension of Comment Period on Draft Documents Related to the
Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur
Oxides
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of extension of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a
30-day extension of the comment period on two draft documents titled,
Risk and Exposure Assessment for the Review of the Primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides, External Review Draft
(draft REA) and Policy Assessment for the Review of the Primary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides, External
Review Draft (draft PA). The EPA is extending the comment period for an
additional 30 days to provide stakeholders and the public with
additional time to review these documents and to prepare meaningful
comments. The original comment period was to end on October 18, 2017.
The extended comment period will now close on November 17, 2017.
DATES: The comment period for the document published in the Federal
Register on September 19, 2017 (82 FR 43756) is extended. Comments must
be received on or before November 17, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2013-0566, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. The draft REA and draft PA are available via the Internet at
https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-air-quality-standards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Nicole Hagan, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (Mail Code C504-06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541-3153; fax number: (919) 541-5315; email:
hagan.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a
[[Page 48508]]
copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as
CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information
so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures
set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the notice by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
Follow directions. The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a CFR part or
section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternative and
substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumption and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Information Specific to the Documents
Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment
and revision of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
Section 108 (42 U.S.C. 7408) directs the Administrator to identify and
list certain air pollutants and then to issue air quality criteria for
those pollutants. The Administrator is to list those air pollutants
that in his ``judgment, cause or contribute to air pollution which may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare''; ``the
presence of which in the ambient air results from numerous or diverse
mobile or stationary sources''; and ``for which . . . [the
Administrator] plans to issue air quality criteria . . .'' (42 U.S.C.
7408(a)(1)(A)-(C)). Air quality criteria are intended to ``accurately
reflect the latest scientific knowledge useful in indicating the kind
and extent of all identifiable effects on public health or welfare
which may be expected from the presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient
air . . .'' (42 U.S.C. 7408(a)(2)). Under section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409),
the EPA establishes primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-
based) NAAQS for pollutants for which air quality criteria are issued.
Section 109(d) requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision
of existing air quality criteria. The revised air quality criteria
reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the effects of the
pollutant on public health or welfare. The EPA is also required to
periodically review and revise the NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the
revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2) requires that an independent
scientific review committee ``shall complete a review of the criteria .
. . and the national primary and secondary ambient air quality
standards . . . and shall recommend to the Administrator any new . . .
standards and revisions of the existing criteria and standards as may
be appropriate . . . .'' Since the early 1980s, this independent review
function has been performed by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC).
Presently, the EPA is reviewing the air quality criteria and
primary NAAQS for sulfur oxides.\1\ The EPA's overall plan for this
review is presented in the Integrated Review Plan for the Primary NAAQS
for Sulfur Dioxide (IRP). The EPA is currently working to finalize the
Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides--Health Criteria (ISA),
the second draft of which was reviewed by the CASAC at a public meeting
in March 2017 (82 FR 11449). The Risk and Exposure Assessment Planning
Document for the Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Sulfur Oxides (REA Planning Document) was also reviewed
by the CASAC at this meeting (82 FR 11449). The draft REA and draft PA,
which build on information presented in these documents, were the
subject of review by the CASAC at a public meeting on September 18-19,
2017 (82 FR 37213). The EPA will consider comments received from the
CASAC and the public in preparing revisions to these documents. The
draft REA and PA documents, and other documents in this review,
referenced above, are available on the EPA's Technology Transfer
Network Web site at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/sulfur-dioxide-so2-primary-air-quality-standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The indicator for the current standard is sulfur dioxide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The notice of availability for the draft REA and draft PA was
originally published on September 19, 2017, with the public comment
period closing on October 18, 2017 (82 FR 43756). We received a request
from a member of the public to extend the comment period by 30 days.
After considering this request, we are extending the comment period
and, as described above, it will now close on November 17, 2017.
Dated: October 11, 2017.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2017-22678 Filed 10-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P