Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security Technology Consortium, 48267-48268 [2017-22442]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices
calendar days, made an offer to acquire,
expressed an interest in acquiring,
entered into negotiations to acquire, or
was contacted or made an inquiry about
acquiring, any interest in the Divestiture
Assets, and shall describe in detail each
contact with any such person during
that period. Each such affidavit shall
also include a description of the efforts
defendants have taken to solicit buyers
for the Divestiture Assets, and to
provide required information to
prospective Acquirers, including the
limitations, if any, on such information.
Assuming the information set forth in
the affidavit is true and complete, any
objection by the United States to
information provided by defendants,
including limitation on information,
shall be made within fourteen (14)
calendar days of receipt of such
affidavit.
B. Within twenty (20) calendar days
of the filing of the Complaint in this
matter, defendants shall deliver to the
United States an affidavit that describes
in reasonable detail all actions
defendants have taken and all steps
defendants have implemented on an
ongoing basis to comply with Section
VIII of this Final Judgment. Defendants
shall deliver to the United States an
affidavit describing any changes to the
efforts and actions outlined in
defendants’ earlier affidavits filed
pursuant to this section within fifteen
(15) calendar days after the change is
implemented.
C. Defendants shall keep all records of
all efforts made to preserve and divest
the Divestiture Assets until one year
after such divestiture has been
completed.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
X. COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
A. For the purposes of determining or
securing compliance with this Final
Judgment, or of any related orders such
as any Hold Separate Stipulation and
Order, or of determining whether the
Final Judgment should be modified or
vacated, and subject to any legallyrecognized privilege, from time to time
authorized representatives of the United
States Department of Justice, including
consultants and other persons retained
by the United States, shall, upon written
request of an authorized representative
of the Assistant Attorney General in
charge of the Antitrust Division, and on
reasonable notice to defendants, be
permitted:
1) access during defendants’ office hours to
inspect and copy, or at the option of the
United States, to require defendants to
provide hard copy or electronic copies of, all
books, ledgers, accounts, records, data, and
documents in the possession, custody, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 16, 2017
Jkt 244001
control of defendants, relating to any matters
contained in this Final Judgment; and
2) to interview, either informally or on the
record, defendants’ officers, employees, or
agents, who may have their individual
counsel present, regarding such matters. The
interviews shall be subject to the reasonable
convenience of the interviewee and without
restraint or interference by defendants.
B. Upon the written request of an
authorized representative of the
Assistant Attorney General in charge of
the Antitrust Division, defendants shall
submit written reports or response to
written interrogatories, under oath if
requested, relating to any of the matters
contained in this Final Judgment as may
be requested.
C. No information or documents
obtained by the means provided in this
section shall be divulged by the United
States to any person other than an
authorized representative of the
executive branch of the United States,
except in the course of legal proceedings
to which the United States is a party
(including grand jury proceedings), or
for the purpose of securing compliance
with this Final Judgment, or as
otherwise required by law.
D. If at the time information or
documents are furnished by defendants
to the United States, defendants
represent and identify in writing the
material in any such information or
documents to which a claim of
protection may be asserted under Rule
26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, and defendants mark each
pertinent page of such material,
‘‘Subject to claim of protection under
Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States
shall give defendants ten (10) calendar
days notice prior to divulging such
material in any legal proceeding (other
than a grand jury proceeding).
XI. NO REACQUISITION
Defendants may not reacquire any
part of the Divestiture Assets during the
term of this Final Judgment.
XII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
This Court retains jurisdiction to
enable any party to this Final Judgment
to apply to this Court at any time for
further orders and directions as may be
necessary or appropriate to carry out or
construe this Final Judgment, to modify
any of its provisions, to enforce
compliance, and to punish violations of
its provisions.
XIII. EXPIRATION OF FINAL
JUDGMENT
Unless this Court grants an extension,
this Final Judgment shall expire ten (10)
years from the date of its entry.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48267
XIV. PUBLIC INTEREST
DETERMINATION
Entry of this Final Judgment is in the
public interest. The parties have
complied with the requirements of the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies
available to the public of this Final
Judgment, the Competitive Impact
Statement, and any comments thereon
and the United States’ responses to
comments. Based upon the record
before the Court, which includes the
Competitive Impact Statement and any
comments and response to comments
filed with the Court, entry of this Final
Judgment is in the public interest.
Date:
Court approval subject to procedures of
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15
U.S.C. 16.
lllllllllllllllllllll
United States District Judge
[FR Doc. 2017–22443 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Border Security
Technology Consortium
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 22, 2017, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Border Security Technology Consortium
(‘‘BSTC’’) has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Michigan Technology
University, Houghton, MI; and TRI–COR
Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA, have
been added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and BSTC intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 18, 2012 (77 FR 36292).
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
48268
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 8, 2017. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on July 25, 2017 (85 FR 34551).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2017–22442 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Membership of the Senior Executive
Service Standing Performance Review
Boards
Department of Justice.
Notice of Department of
Justice’s standing members of the Senior
Executive Service Performance Review
Boards.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
BILLING CODE P
The Department of Justice.
announces the membership of its 2017
Senior Executive Service (SES) Standing
Performance Review Boards (PRBs). The
purpose of a PRB is to provide fair and
SUMMARY:
impartial review of SES performance
appraisals, bonus recommendations and
pay adjustments. The PRBs will make
recommendations regarding the final
performance ratings to be assigned, SES
bonuses and/or pay adjustments to be
awarded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary A. Lamary, Director, Human
Resources, Justice Management
Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514–4350.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
2017 FEDERAL REGISTER
Name
Position title
Office of the Attorney General—OAG
HUNT, JODY (DETAIL) ..................
MORRISSEY, BRIAN .....................
CUTRONA, DANIELLE ...................
CHIEF OF STAFF AND COUNSELOR.
COUNSELOR TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
SENIOR COUNSELOR.
Office of the Deputy Attorney General—ODAG
HUR, ROBERT ...............................
SWANSON, JAMES .......................
SCHOOLS, SCOTT ........................
GUAHAR, TASHINA .......................
CROWELL, JAMES A .....................
CONNOLLY, ROBERT ...................
GOLDSMITH, ANDREW .................
MICHALIC, MARK ..........................
GEISE, JOHN .................................
PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
CHIEF OF STAFF/ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION.
NATIONAL CRIMINAL DISCOVERY COORDINATOR.
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CRISIS RESPONSE COORDINATOR.
CHIEF, PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT REVIEW UNIT.
Office of the Associate Attorney General—OASG
PANUCCIO, JESSE ........................
MCARTHUR, ERIC .........................
COX, STEVE ..................................
MURRAY, BRIAN ...........................
FRANCISCO, NOEL .......................
PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
SENIOR ADVISOR.
Office of the Solicitor General—OSG
WALL, JEFFREY ............................
DREEBEN, MICHAEL R .................
KNEEDLER, EDWIN S ...................
STEWART, MALCOLM L ...............
PRINCIPAL DEPUTY SOLICITOR GEN.
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.
Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties
WINN, PETER ................................
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Antitrust Division—ATR
FINCH, ANDREW ...........................
NIGRO, BERNARD .........................
ARMINGTON, ELIZABETH J .........
BRINK, PATRICIA A .......................
COHEN, SCOTT .............................
DRENNAN, RONALD .....................
FAMILANT, NORMAN ....................
FOUNTAIN, DOROTHY ..................
GREER, TRACY .............................
HOLLAND, CAROLINE ...................
LIMARZI, KRISTEN ........................
MUCCHETTI, PETER J ..................
MAJURE, WILLIAM ROBERT ........
MARTINO, JEFFREY .....................
PETRIZZI, MARIBETH ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 16, 2017
PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
CHIEF, ECONOMIC REGULATORY SECTION.
DIRECTOR OF CIVIL ENFORCEMENT.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
CHIEF, COMPETITION POLICY SECTION.
CHIEF, ECONOMIC LITIGATION SECTION.
SENIOR COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR OF RISK MANAGEMENT.
ATTORNEY ADVISOR.
CHIEF COUNSEL FOR COMPETITION POLICY AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS.
CHIEF, APPELLATE SECTION.
CHIEF, LITIGATION I SECTION.
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMICS.
CHIEF, NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE.
CHIEF, LITIGATION II SECTION.
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48267-48268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22442]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Border Security Technology Consortium
Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2017, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Border Security Technology
Consortium (``BSTC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Michigan Technology University, Houghton, MI; and TRI-COR
Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA, have been added as parties to this
venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and BSTC intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 18,
2012 (77 FR 36292).
[[Page 48268]]
The last notification was filed with the Department on June 8,
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 2017 (85 FR 34551).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-22442 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
