Notice of Intent To Amend Land Use Plans Regarding Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation and Prepare Associated Environmental Impact Statements or Environmental Assessments, 47248-47249 [2017-21958]
Download as PDF
47248
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Notices
Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–2.
Donald Gonzalez,
Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2017–21962 Filed 10–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO350000.16X.L11100000.PI0000
LXSISGMW0000]
Notice of Cancellation of Withdrawal
Application and Withdrawal Proposal
and Notice of Termination of
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Sagebrush Focal Area Withdrawal
in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon,
Utah and Wyoming
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has canceled its
withdrawal application and the
withdrawal proposal relating to
approximately 10 million acres of
public and National Forest system lands
located within Sagebrush Focal Areas
(SFAs) in Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. The BLM
has determined that the lands are no
longer needed in connection with the
proposed withdrawal. The BLM has also
terminated the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement
evaluating this application and
proposal.
DATES: This Notice is applicable on
October 11, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark A. Mackiewicz, BLM, by
telephone at 435–636–3616, mail to 125
South 600 West, Price, UT 84501–2833
or by email at mmackiew@blm.gov.
Persons using a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 800–877–
8339. FRS is available 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, to leave a message or
question. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice
of Proposed Withdrawal was published
in the Federal Register on September
24, 2015, (80 FR 57635), as corrected (80
FR 63583), of the Department’s proposal
to withdraw approximately 10 million
acres of public and National Forest
System lands in Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming
from location and entry under the
United States mining laws for 20 years,
subject to valid existing rights. The
September 24, 2015, Notice also served
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Oct 10, 2017
Jkt 244001
as a Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4331, and initiated
a public scoping process. The BLM has
determined that the lands are no longer
needed in connection with the proposed
withdrawal. In accordance with 43 CFR
2310.1–4(a), the BLM therefore has
canceled the proposed withdrawal and
its application in support thereof.
Preparation of an EIS is hereby
terminated. Pursuant to 43 CFR 2310.2–
1(d), the segregative effect for the lands
described in 80 FR 57635 as amended
by 80 FR 63583 terminated by operation
of law on September 24, 2017, and the
lands are currently open to location and
entry under the United States mining
laws, subject to valid existing rights, the
provision of existing withdrawals, other
segregations of record, and the
requirements of applicable law.
Michael D. Nedd,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2017–21963 Filed 10–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO200000/LXSGPL000000/17x/
L11100000.PH0000]
Notice of Intent To Amend Land Use
Plans Regarding Greater Sage-Grouse
Conservation and Prepare Associated
Environmental Impact Statements or
Environmental Assessments
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
On March 31, 2017, the
United States District Court for the
District of Nevada held that the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) violated the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, (NEPA) by failing to
prepare a supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the
designation of Sagebrush Focal Areas
(SFA) in the Nevada and Northeastern
California Greater Sage-Grouse Resource
Management Plan (RMP) Amendment in
Nevada. In order to comply with the
court’s order and to address issues
raised by various interested parties, the
BLM intends to consider the possibility
of amending some, all or none of the
BLM land use plans that were amended
or revised in 2014 and 2015 regarding
Greater Sage-Grouse conservation in the
States of California, Colorado, Idaho,
Nevada, Oregon, Wyoming, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Montana (‘‘2015 Sage-Grouse Plans’’).
By this Notice the BLM is announcing
the beginning of the scoping process to
solicit public comments on Greater
Sage-Grouse land management issues
that could warrant land use plan
amendments.
DATES: This Notice initiates the public
scoping process for RMP amendment(s)
with associated NEPA document(s).
Comments may be submitted in writing
until November 27, 2017. The date(s)
and location(s) of any scoping meetings
will be announced at least 15 days in
advance through local news media,
newspapers and the BLM Web site at:
https://bit.ly/GRSGplanning. In order to
be included in the analysis, all
comments must be received prior to the
close of the 45-day scoping period or 15
days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later. We will provide
additional opportunities for public
participation as appropriate.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on issues and planning criteria related
to amending land use plans regarding
Greater Sage-Grouse conservation to the
BLM Web site at: https://bit.ly/
GRSGplanning or to one of the
addresses listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below. If your
comments are specific to an individual
State or region, please specify that in
your comments.
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may be examined at the addresses listed
below in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Johanna Munson in the BLM-Idaho
State Office at (208) 373–7834, email
BLM_sagegrouseplanning@blm.gov, or
mail 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, ID
83708. For a list of local BLM contacts,
please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to
contact the above individuals during
normal business hours. The FRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
31, 2017, the United States District
Court for the District of Nevada held
that the BLM violated NEPA by failing
to prepare a supplemental EIS for the
designation of SFAs in the 2015 Greater
Sage-Grouse Plan in Nevada. Similar
claims were raised in other lawsuits that
have not been decided. The BLM also
recognizes that the 2015 Greater SageGrouse Plans blended elements from
among the action alternatives analyzed
through the NEPA process for those
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Notices
decisions. In order to comply with the
court’s order, to address issues raised by
various interested parties, and to
consider recommendations in the
August 4, 2017, report prepared by the
Department of the Interior’s Greater
Sage-Grouse Review Team in Response
to Secretary’s Order 3353 (SO 3353), the
BLM seeks comment on the SFA
designation, mitigation standards, lek
buffers in all habitat management area
types, disturbance and density caps,
habitat boundaries to reflect new
information, and reversing adaptive
management responses when the BLM
determines that resource conditions no
longer warrant those responses. The
BLM also seeks comment on Statespecific issues, such as the need for
General Habitat Management Areas in
Utah, and other issues identified by
State, tribal, and local governments. The
BLM also seeks input on planning
criteria, which include compliance with
laws and regulations and adequacy of
Greater Sage-Grouse conservation
measures in the land use plans. Any
RMP amendment(s) with associated
NEPA document(s)—EISs or
Environmental Assessments (EAs)—
developed will be completed in
compliance with NEPA and the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended.
The BLM coordinated with the Sage
Grouse Task Force to develop the SO
3353 report and continues to identify
issues that warrant clarification or
reconsideration. This coordination effort
is continuing and will help to inform
the BLM’s implementation of SO 3353
in each State, as will input from other
stakeholders. This Notice and potential
planning effort does not preclude the
BLM from addressing issues and
inconsistencies through other means,
including policy, training, or plan
maintenance, nor does it commit the
BLM to amending some, all, or none of
the Greater Sage-Grouse plans. In
addition to comments on the issues and
planning criteria, the BLM would like to
receive input on whether the planning
effort should occur through state-bystate amendment processes and
decisions. In particular, the BLM looks
forward to receiving the comments of
the Governors of each state, and will
strive to accommodate those comments
to the extent practicable given prior
collaborative efforts.
You may submit comments in writing
to the BLM at any public scoping
meeting, or you may submit them to the
BLM using the method listed in the
ADDRESSES section. You should submit
comments by the close of the 45-day
scoping period or within 15 days after
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Oct 10, 2017
Jkt 244001
the last public meeting, whichever is
later.
The BLM will utilize and coordinate
the NEPA scoping process to help fulfill
the public involvement process under
the National Historic Preservation Act
(54 U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36
CFR 800.2(d)(3). The information about
historic and cultural resources within
the area potentially affected by the
proposed action will assist the BLM in
identifying and evaluating impacts to
such resources.
The following is a list of BLM
contacts and the BLM offices where
documents may be examined:
California: Jeremiah Karuzas;
telephone: 916–978–4644; email:
jkaruzas@blm.gov; 2800 Cottage Way
Sacramento, CA 95825.
Colorado: Bridget Clayton; telephone:
970–244–3045; email: bclayton@
blm.gov; 2815 H Road, Grand Junction,
CO 81506.
Idaho: Ammon Wilhelm; telephone:
208–373–3824; email: awilhelm@
blm.gov; 1387 S Vinnell Way, Boise, ID
83708.
Nevada: Matt Magaletti; telephone:
775–861–6472; email: mmagalet@
blm.gov; 1340 Financial Blvd., Reno, NV
89502.
Montana/Dakotas: John Carlson;
telephone: 406–896–5024; email:
jccarlso@blm.gov; 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings, MT 59101.
Oregon: Molly Anthony; telephone:
503–808–6052; email: manthony@
blm.gov; 1220 South West 3rd Avenue,
Portland, OR 97204.
Utah: Quincy Bahr; telephone: 801–
539–4122; email: qfbahr@blm.gov; 440
West 200 South Suite 500, Salt Lake
City, UT 84101.
Wyoming: Erica Husse; telephone:
307–775–6318; email: ehusse@blm.gov;
5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY
82009.
The BLM will consult with Indian
tribes on a government-to-government
basis in accordance with Executive
Order 13175 and other policies. Tribal
concerns, including impacts on Indian
trust assets and potential impacts to
cultural resources, will be given due
consideration. Federal, State, and local
agencies, along with tribes and other
stakeholders that may be interested in or
affected by the proposed action that the
BLM is evaluating, are invited to
participate in the scoping process and,
if eligible, may request or be requested
by the BLM to participate in the
development of the environmental
analysis as a cooperating agency.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47249
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. The BLM will evaluate identified
issues to be addressed in the plan, and
will place them into one of three
categories:
1. Issues to be resolved in the plan
amendment(s);
2. Issues to be resolved through policy
or administrative action; or
3. Issues beyond the scope of the plan
amendment(s).
The public is encouraged to help
identify any issues, management
questions, or concerns that should be
addressed in the plan amendment(s).
The BLM will work collaboratively with
interested parties to identify the
management decisions that are best
suited to local, regional, and national
needs and concerns.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary
approach to develop the plan
amendment(s) in order to consider the
variety of resource issues and concerns
identified.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR
1610.2.
Michael D. Nedd,
Acting BLM Director.
[FR Doc. 2017–21958 Filed 10–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–24190;
PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service is
soliciting comments on the significance
of properties nominated before
September 16, 2017, for listing or
related actions in the National Register
of Historic Places.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
by October 26, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via
U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers
to the National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St.
NW., MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
properties listed in this notice are being
considered for listing or related actions
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47248-47249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21958]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO200000/LXSGPL000000/17x/L11100000.PH0000]
Notice of Intent To Amend Land Use Plans Regarding Greater Sage-
Grouse Conservation and Prepare Associated Environmental Impact
Statements or Environmental Assessments
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 31, 2017, the United States District Court for the
District of Nevada held that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended,
(NEPA) by failing to prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the designation of Sagebrush Focal Areas (SFA) in
the Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse Resource
Management Plan (RMP) Amendment in Nevada. In order to comply with the
court's order and to address issues raised by various interested
parties, the BLM intends to consider the possibility of amending some,
all or none of the BLM land use plans that were amended or revised in
2014 and 2015 regarding Greater Sage-Grouse conservation in the States
of California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Wyoming, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Utah and Montana (``2015 Sage-Grouse Plans''). By this
Notice the BLM is announcing the beginning of the scoping process to
solicit public comments on Greater Sage-Grouse land management issues
that could warrant land use plan amendments.
DATES: This Notice initiates the public scoping process for RMP
amendment(s) with associated NEPA document(s). Comments may be
submitted in writing until November 27, 2017. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will be announced at least 15 days
in advance through local news media, newspapers and the BLM Web site
at: https://bit.ly/GRSGplanning. In order to be included in the
analysis, all comments must be received prior to the close of the 45-
day scoping period or 15 days after the last public meeting, whichever
is later. We will provide additional opportunities for public
participation as appropriate.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on issues and planning criteria
related to amending land use plans regarding Greater Sage-Grouse
conservation to the BLM Web site at: https://bit.ly/GRSGplanning or to
one of the addresses listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. If your comments are specific to an individual State or region,
please specify that in your comments.
Documents pertinent to this proposal may be examined at the
addresses listed below in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Johanna Munson in the BLM-Idaho State
Office at (208) 373-7834, email BLM_sagegrouseplanning@blm.gov, or mail
1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83708. For a list of local BLM
contacts, please see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above
individuals during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 31, 2017, the United States
District Court for the District of Nevada held that the BLM violated
NEPA by failing to prepare a supplemental EIS for the designation of
SFAs in the 2015 Greater Sage-Grouse Plan in Nevada. Similar claims
were raised in other lawsuits that have not been decided. The BLM also
recognizes that the 2015 Greater Sage-Grouse Plans blended elements
from among the action alternatives analyzed through the NEPA process
for those
[[Page 47249]]
decisions. In order to comply with the court's order, to address issues
raised by various interested parties, and to consider recommendations
in the August 4, 2017, report prepared by the Department of the
Interior's Greater Sage-Grouse Review Team in Response to Secretary's
Order 3353 (SO 3353), the BLM seeks comment on the SFA designation,
mitigation standards, lek buffers in all habitat management area types,
disturbance and density caps, habitat boundaries to reflect new
information, and reversing adaptive management responses when the BLM
determines that resource conditions no longer warrant those responses.
The BLM also seeks comment on State-specific issues, such as the need
for General Habitat Management Areas in Utah, and other issues
identified by State, tribal, and local governments. The BLM also seeks
input on planning criteria, which include compliance with laws and
regulations and adequacy of Greater Sage-Grouse conservation measures
in the land use plans. Any RMP amendment(s) with associated NEPA
document(s)--EISs or Environmental Assessments (EAs)--developed will be
completed in compliance with NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976, as amended.
The BLM coordinated with the Sage Grouse Task Force to develop the
SO 3353 report and continues to identify issues that warrant
clarification or reconsideration. This coordination effort is
continuing and will help to inform the BLM's implementation of SO 3353
in each State, as will input from other stakeholders. This Notice and
potential planning effort does not preclude the BLM from addressing
issues and inconsistencies through other means, including policy,
training, or plan maintenance, nor does it commit the BLM to amending
some, all, or none of the Greater Sage-Grouse plans. In addition to
comments on the issues and planning criteria, the BLM would like to
receive input on whether the planning effort should occur through
state-by-state amendment processes and decisions. In particular, the
BLM looks forward to receiving the comments of the Governors of each
state, and will strive to accommodate those comments to the extent
practicable given prior collaborative efforts.
You may submit comments in writing to the BLM at any public scoping
meeting, or you may submit them to the BLM using the method listed in
the ADDRESSES section. You should submit comments by the close of the
45-day scoping period or within 15 days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later.
The BLM will utilize and coordinate the NEPA scoping process to
help fulfill the public involvement process under the National Historic
Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3).
The information about historic and cultural resources within the area
potentially affected by the proposed action will assist the BLM in
identifying and evaluating impacts to such resources.
The following is a list of BLM contacts and the BLM offices where
documents may be examined:
California: Jeremiah Karuzas; telephone: 916-978-4644; email:
jkaruzas@blm.gov; 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825.
Colorado: Bridget Clayton; telephone: 970-244-3045; email:
bclayton@blm.gov; 2815 H Road, Grand Junction, CO 81506.
Idaho: Ammon Wilhelm; telephone: 208-373-3824; email:
awilhelm@blm.gov; 1387 S Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83708.
Nevada: Matt Magaletti; telephone: 775-861-6472; email:
mmagalet@blm.gov; 1340 Financial Blvd., Reno, NV 89502.
Montana/Dakotas: John Carlson; telephone: 406-896-5024; email:
jccarlso@blm.gov; 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, MT 59101.
Oregon: Molly Anthony; telephone: 503-808-6052; email:
manthony@blm.gov; 1220 South West 3rd Avenue, Portland, OR 97204.
Utah: Quincy Bahr; telephone: 801-539-4122; email: qfbahr@blm.gov;
440 West 200 South Suite 500, Salt Lake City, UT 84101.
Wyoming: Erica Husse; telephone: 307-775-6318; email:
ehusse@blm.gov; 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009.
The BLM will consult with Indian tribes on a government-to-
government basis in accordance with Executive Order 13175 and other
policies. Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and
potential impacts to cultural resources, will be given due
consideration. Federal, State, and local agencies, along with tribes
and other stakeholders that may be interested in or affected by the
proposed action that the BLM is evaluating, are invited to participate
in the scoping process and, if eligible, may request or be requested by
the BLM to participate in the development of the environmental analysis
as a cooperating agency.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. The BLM will evaluate identified issues to be addressed
in the plan, and will place them into one of three categories:
1. Issues to be resolved in the plan amendment(s);
2. Issues to be resolved through policy or administrative action;
or
3. Issues beyond the scope of the plan amendment(s).
The public is encouraged to help identify any issues, management
questions, or concerns that should be addressed in the plan
amendment(s). The BLM will work collaboratively with interested parties
to identify the management decisions that are best suited to local,
regional, and national needs and concerns.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary approach to develop the plan
amendment(s) in order to consider the variety of resource issues and
concerns identified.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR 1610.2.
Michael D. Nedd,
Acting BLM Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-21958 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P