Approval and Promulgation; State of Utah; Salt Lake County and Utah County Nonattainment Area Coarse Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan Revisions To Control Measures for Point Sources, 47149-47154 [2017-21778]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate Matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur Dioxides. Dated: September 27, 2017. Cathy Stepp, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 47149 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA—Missouri 2. Amend § 52.1320 by adding paragraphs (e)(72) and (73) to read as follows: ■ § 52.1320 * For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS Applicable geographic or nonattainment area State submittal date EPA approval date * * (72) Sections 110 (a)(1) and 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. * Statewide ....... * 10/14/2015 * 10/11/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation]. (73) Missouri State Statute section 105.483(5) RSMo 2014, and Missouri State Statute section 105.485 RSMo 2014. Statewide ....... 10/14/2015 10/11/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation]. Name of non-regulatory SIP provision [FR Doc. 2017–21806 Filed 10–10–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R08–OAR–2017–0298; FRL–9969–01– Region 8] Approval and Promulgation; State of Utah; Salt Lake County and Utah County Nonattainment Area Coarse Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan Revisions To Control Measures for Point Sources Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of certain State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by Utah on January 4, 2016, and of certain revisions SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 Jkt 244001 submitted on January 19, 2017, for the coarse particulate matter (PM10) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in the Salt Lake County and Utah County PM10 nonattainment areas. The revisions that the EPA is approving are located in Utah Division of Administrative Rule (DAR) R307–110– 17 and SIP Subsection IX.H.1–4, and establish emissions limits for PM10, NOX and SO2 for certain stationary sources in the nonattainment areas. These actions are being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on November 13, 2017. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2017–0298. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Explanation * * This action approves the following CAA elements: 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3, D((ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA– R07–OAR–2017–0513; FRL–9969– 12—Region 7.] EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0513; FRL–9969– 12—Region 7. copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Hou, Air Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6210, hou.james@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Under the 1990 amendments to the CAA, Salt Lake and Utah Counties were designated nonattainment for PM10 and classified as moderate areas by operation of law as of November 15, 1990 (56 FR 56694, 56840; November 6, 1991). On July 8, 1994, the EPA approved the PM10 SIP for the Salt Lake and Utah County Nonattainment Areas E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM 11OCR1 47150 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations (59 FR 35036). The SIP included a demonstration of attainment and various control measures, including emission limits at stationary sources. On January 4, 2016, Utah submitted SIP revisions to R307–110–17 titled ‘‘Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part H, Emission Limits’’ and revisions to Subsection IX.H.1–4. The titles for Subsection IX.H.1–4 include: (1) General Requirements: Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission Limits and Operating Practices, PM10 Requirements; (2) Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10 Nonattainment/ Maintenance Area; (3) Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area; and (4) Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices. Additionally, on January 19, 2017, Utah submitted revisions to Subsection IX.H.1–4. Further discussion of the revisions to R307–110–17 and Subsection IX.H.1–4 can be found below. On July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32287), the EPA proposed to approve certain SIP revisions to the Salt Lake County and Utah County NAA Moderate area SIPs submitted by the State. Our proposed notice provides details on the EPA’s evaluation of the State’s submittals. The submittals dated January 4, 2016, and January 19, 2017, contained revisions to the Utah DAR, Title R307— Environmental Quality, set of rules, and SIP subsection IX.H.1–4. II. Response to Comments The EPA did not receive any comments on the July 13, 2017 proposed action. III. Final Action For the reasons stated in our proposed notice, the EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to Administrative Rule R307– 110–17 and revisions to Subsection IX.H.1–4 for incorporation into the Utah SIP as submitted by the State of Utah on January 4, 2016, and January 19, 2017. These revisions establish emissions limitations and related requirements for certain stationary sources of PM10, NOX and SO2, and will therefore serve to continue progress towards attainment and maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS in the nonattainment areas. The revisions reflect more stringent emission levels for total emissions of PM10, SO2, and NOX for each of the affected facilities, as well as updates of the inventory of major stationary sources to accurately reflect the current sources in both the Salt Lake County and Utah County nonattainment areas (e.g., removing sources which no longer exist, or are now covered under an area source rule). The updated list of sources and revised emission limits for the major stationary sources in the two nonattainment areas will serve to enhance both area’s ability to attain or maintain the NAAQS. The specific emission limits and operating practices the EPA is finalizing for approval are listed in the following tables: TABLE 1—SOURCE SPECIFIC EMISSION LIMITATIONS IN THE SALT LAKE COUNTY PM10 NONATTAINMENT AREA Concentration based limits Alternative emission limits 2.1 tpd. 1.05 tpd. ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... 5.50 MMscf natural gas per day. 0.061 MM pounds of carbon fiber produced per day. PM10 ............................... Facility Wide ................... 0.416 tpd. NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. ......................................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... ......................................... 2.09 tpd. 0.31 tpd. ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... Kennecott Copperton Concentrator. ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... Kennecott Utah Copper: Power Plant and Tailings Impoundment. PM10 ............................... Power Plant Unit #5 ....... 18.8 lb/hr. NOX ................................ NOX ................................ Power Plant Unit #5 ....... Power Plant Unit #5 Startup/Shutdown. Units #1, #2, #3, and #4 Nov 1–Feb 28/29 ............ Units #1, #2, #3, and #4 Nov 1–Feb 28/29. Units #1, #2, and #3 Nov 1–Feb 28/29. Unit #4 Nov 1–Feb 28/29 Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1–Oct 1. ......................................... 395 lb/hr. Source Pollutant Process unit Big West Oil ..................... PM10 ............................... NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... GT#1 ............................... 1.037 tons per day (tpd) 0.8 tpd. 0.6 tpd. 0.6 g NOX/kW-hr. NOX ................................ NOX ................................ GT#2 and GT#3 ............. Facility Wide ................... 7.5 lb NOX/hr. 0.648 tpd. PM10 ............................... Facility Wide ................... 0.715 tpd. NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. ......................................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... ......................................... ......................................... Bountiful City Light and Power. Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility. Chevron Products Company. Hexcel Corporations ........ Holly Refining and Marketing Company. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES Kennecott Utah Copper: Bingham Canyon Mine. PM10 (Filterable) ............. PM10 (Filterable + Condensable). NOX ................................ NOX ................................ PM10 (Filterable) ............. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4700 Mass based limits 2.0 ppmdv (15% O2 dry). 0.004 grains/dscf. 0.03 grains/dscf. ......................................... 336 ppmdv (3% O2). ......................................... 0.029 grains/dscf. 336 ppmdv (3% O2). Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM 11OCR1 Maximum of 30,000 miles for waste haul trucks per day. Fugitive road dust emission control requirements. Requirement to operate a gas scrubber operated in accordance with parametric monitoring. Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 47151 TABLE 1—SOURCE SPECIFIC EMISSION LIMITATIONS IN THE SALT LAKE COUNTY PM10 NONATTAINMENT AREA— Continued Source Pollutant Process unit PM10 (Filterable + Condensable). PM10 (Filterable) ............. NOX ................................ Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1–Oct 1. Unit #4; Mar 1–Oct 1 ...... Units #1, #2, and #3; Mar 1–Oct 1. Unit #4; Mar 1–Oct 1 ...... Main Stack ...................... ......................................... 89.5 lb/hr. Main Stack ...................... NOX ................................ NOX ................................ Steam Unit #2 ................ Steam Unit #3 ................ NOX ................................ PM10 ............................... Steam Unit #3 ................ Facility Wide ................... 204 lb/hr. 142 lb./hr. (Nov 1–Feb 28/29). 203 lb/hr (Mar 1–Oct 31). 2.25 tpd. University of Utah ............ NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ West Valley Power 1 ........ NOX ................................ Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... Boiler #3 ......................... Boiler #4a & #4b ............ Boiler #5a & #5b ............ Turbine ........................... Turbine and WHRU Duct burner. Sum of all five turbines .. Alternative emission limits 552 lb/hr. 422 lb/hr. 154 lb/hr. 9.5 lb/hr. NOX ................................ Main Stack ...................... Main Stack ...................... Main Stack ...................... Refinery: Sum of 2 tank house boilers. Refinery: Combined Heat Plant. Molybdenum Autoclave Project: Combined Heat Plant. Steam Unit #1 ................ Concentration based limits 439 lb/hr. Kennecott Utah Copper: Smelter and Refinery. NOX ................................ PM10 (Filterable) ............. PM10 (Filterable + Condensable). SO2 (3-hr rolling avg) ..... SO2 (daily avg) ............... NOX (daily avg) .............. NOX ................................ NOX ................................ NOX ................................ PacifiCorp Energy: Gadsby Power Plant. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company. 1 West Mass based limits 0.29 grains/dscf. 0.029 grains/dscf. ......................................... 426.5 ppmdv (3% O2). 384 ppmdv (3% O2). 5.96 lb/hr. 5.01 lb/hr. 179 lb/hr. 1.988 tpd. 3.1 tpd. ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... ......................................... 187 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry). 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry). 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry). 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry). 15 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry). 1,050 lb/day. Valley Power was not a listed source in the 1994 SIP for the Salt Lake County PM10 NAA. TABLE 2—SOURCE SPECIFIC EMISSION LIMITATIONS IN THE UTAH COUNTY PM10 NONATTAINMENT AREA Source Pollutant Process unit Mass based limits Concentration based limits Brigham Young University NOX ................................ NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ NOX ................................ SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ PM10 ............................... Unit #1 2 .......................... Unit #2 ............................ Unit #2 ............................ Unit #3 ............................ Unit #3 ............................ Unit #4 3 .......................... Unit #5 ............................ Unit #5 ............................ Unit #6 3 .......................... Prill Tower ...................... 9.55 lb/hr ........................ 37.4 lb/hr. 56.0 lb/hr ........................ 37.4 lb/hr ........................ 56.0 lb/hr ........................ 19.2 lb/hr ........................ 74.8 lb/hr ........................ 112.07 lb/hr .................... 19.2 lb/hr ........................ 0.236 tpd. 95 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 127 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 597 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). 127 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry). PM2.5 .............................. NOX ................................ NOX ................................ NOX ................................ 0.196 tpd. 30.8 lb/hr. 18.4 lb/hr. 14.9 lb/hr. NOX ................................ Prill Tower ...................... Montecatini Plant ............ Weatherly Plant .............. Block #1 Turbine/HRSG Stacks. Block #2 Turbine/HRSG Stacks. All engines combined ..... NOX ................................ All engines combined ..... 2.45 tpd. NOX ................................ All engines combined ..... 1.68 tpd. Geneva Nitrogen Inc.: Geneva Plant. PacifiCorp Energy: Lakeside Power Plant. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES NOX ................................ Payson City Corporation: Payson City Power. Provo City Power: Power Plant. Springville City Corporation: Whitehead Power Plant. Alternative emission limits 18.1 lb/hr. 1.54 tpd. 2 The NO limit for Unit #1 is 95 ppm (9.55 lb/hr) until it operates for more than 300 hours during a rolling 12-month period, then the limit will be 36 ppm (5.44 lb/ X hr). This will be accomplished through the installation of low NOX burners with Flue Gas Recirculation. 3 The NO limit for Units #4 and #6 is 127 ppm (38.5 lb/hr) until December 31, 2018, at which time the limit will then be 36 ppm (19.2 lb/hr). X VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM 11OCR1 47152 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 3—INTERIM EMISSION LIMITS AND OPERATING PRACTICES 4 Source Pollutant Process unit Mass based limits Big West Oil ..................... PM10 ............................... Facility Wide ................... SO2 ................................. Facility Wide ................... NOX ................................ Facility Wide ................... PM10 ............................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... 0.5 tpd. 2.52 tpd. 0.44 tpd. SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ PM10 ............................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... Facility Wide ................... 4.714 tpd. 2.20 tpd. 0.261 tpd. SO2 ................................. Facility Wide ................... NOX ................................ Facility Wide ................... Alternative emission limits 0.377 tpd Oct 1–Mar 31. 0.407 tpd April 1–Sept 30. 2.764 tpd Oct 1–March 31 3.639 tpd April 1– Sept 30. 1.027 tpd Oct 1–Mar 31 1.145 tpd Apr 1 – Sep 30. 0.234 tpd. SO2 ................................. NOX ................................ PM10 ............................... Concentration based limits 3.699 tpd Nov 1–Feb 28/ 29–4.374 tpd Mar 1– Oct 31. 1.988 tpd. Chevron Products Company. Holly Refining and Marketing Company. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company. 4 This section establishes interim emission limits for sources whose new emission limits under Subsections IX.H.2 and 3 are based on controls that are not currently installed, with the provision that all necessary controls needed to meet the emission limits under Subsection IX.H.2 and IX.H.3 shall be installed by January 1, 2019. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Utah Division of Administrative Rules described in the amendments set forth to 40 CFR part 52 below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.1 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of 1 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 Jkt 244001 the CAA. Accordingly, these actions merely approve state law as meeting federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For this reason, these actions: • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Do not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Are not economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Do not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the final rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). B. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM 11OCR1 47153 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 11, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2). 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 2. Section 52.2320 is amended as follows: ■ a. In the table in paragraph (c), by revising under the centered heading ‘‘R307–110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan,’’ the table entry for ‘‘R307–110–17’’; ■ b. In the table in paragraph (e), by revising under the centered heading ■ Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organization compounds. State effective date Rule title * Dated: September 25, 2017. Suzanne J. Bohan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. Subpart TT—Utah List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Rule No. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. * ‘‘IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources,’’ the table entry for ‘‘Section IX.H.1. Fine Particulate Matter (PM10), Emission Limits and Operating Practices (Utah County)’’; ■ c. In the table in paragraph (e), by adding under the centered heading ‘‘IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources.’’ table entries for ‘‘Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;’’ ‘‘Section IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;’’ and ‘‘Section IX.H.4. Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices’’ in numerical order. The revision reads as follows: § 52.2320 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * Final rule citation, date * * * * Comments * * * R307–110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan * R307–110–17 ... * Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part H, Emission Limits. * * * * * * * 12/8/2016 * [Insert Federal Register citation]. 10/11/2017 ...................... * * * * * * (e) * * * State effective date Rule title * * * * Except for Section IX.H.21.e. which is conditionally approved through one year from 7/5/16, IX.H.21.g., Sections of IX.H.21 that reference and apply to the source specific emission limitations disapproved in Section IX.H.22, and Sections IX.H.22.a.ii–iii, IX.H.22.b.ii, and IX.H.22.c. * * * Final rule citation, date * * Comments * ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources * * * * Section IX.H.1. General Requirements: Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission Limits and Operating Practices, PM10 Requirements. Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area. Section IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area. Section IX.H.4. Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices ............ * VerDate Sep<11>2014 * 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 * Jkt 244001 PO 00000 12/3/2015 12/3/2015 12/8/2016 12/3/2015 12/3/2015 * Frm 00071 Fmt 4700 * * [Insert Federal Register citation] 10/11/2017. [Insert Federal Register citation] 10/11/2017. [Insert Federal Register citation] 10/11/2017. [Insert Federal Register citation] 10/11/2017. * Sfmt 4700 * E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM * 11OCR1 * 47154 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations [FR Doc. 2017–21778 Filed 10–10–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0268; FRL–9969– 10—Region 7] Approval of Missouri Air Quality Implementation Plans; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision from the State of Missouri for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Section 110 of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state’s air quality management program are adequate to meet the state’s responsibilities under the CAA. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 11, 2017, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November 13, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2017–0268, to https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Oct 10, 2017 Jkt 244001 submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracey Casburn, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551–7016, or by email at casburn.tracey@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following: I. What is being addressed in this document? II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? III. What action is EPA taking? IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is being addressed in this document? EPA is approving the revision as meeting the submittal requirement of section 110(a)(1). EPA is approving elements of the infrastructure SIP submission from the State of Missouri received on April 30, 2013. Specifically, EPA is approving the following elements of section 110(a)(2): (A) Through (H) (except (D)(i)(II)-protection of visibility (prong 4)), and (J) through (M). EPA is not acting on section 110(a)(2)(I) as it does not expect infrastructure SIP submissions to address the element. EPA will act on prong 4 in a separate action. A Technical Support Document (TSD) is included in this docket to discuss the details of this action, including analysis of how the SIP meets the applicable 110 requirements for infrastructure SIPs. II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state’s submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The state held a public hearing on March 28, 2013 and a public comment period from February 25, 2013 to April 4, 2013. EPA provided comments to the state on April 3, 2013, and were the only commenters. The state revised its proposed SIP in response to EPA’s comments and the revisions were contained in the SIP submitted to EPA on April 30, 2013. The submission satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. As explained in more detail in the TSD, which is part of this docket, PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. III. What action is EPA taking? EPA is taking direct final action to approve elements of the April 30, 2013, infrastructure SIP submission from the State of Missouri, which addresses the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. As stated in above preamble, EPA is approving the revision as meeting the submittal requirement of section 110(a)(1) and approving the following elements of section 110(a)(2): (A) Through (H) (except (D)(i)(II)protection of visibility (prong 4)), and (J) through (M). EPA is not acting on section 110(a)(2)(I) as it does not expect infrastructure SIP submissions to address the element. EPA will act on prong 4 in a separate action. Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that in the case of a plan or plan revision for areas designated as nonattainment areas, states must meet applicable requirements of part D of the CAA, relating to SIP requirements for designated nonattainment areas. EPA does not expect infrastructure SIP submissions to address element (I). The specific SIP submissions for designated nonattainment areas, as required under CAA title I, part D, are subject to different submission schedules than those for section 110 infrastructure elements. EPA will take action on part D attainment plan SIP submissions through a separate rulemaking governed by the requirements for nonattainment areas, as described in part D. We are publishing this direct final rule without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. E:\FR\FM\11OCR1.SGM 11OCR1

Agencies

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47149-47154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0298; FRL-9969-01-Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation; State of Utah; Salt Lake County and
Utah County Nonattainment Area Coarse Particulate Matter State
Implementation Plan Revisions To Control Measures for Point Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of certain State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted
by Utah on January 4, 2016, and of certain revisions submitted on
January 19, 2017, for the coarse particulate matter (PM10)
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) in the Salt Lake County
and Utah County PM10 nonattainment areas. The revisions that
the EPA is approving are located in Utah Division of Administrative
Rule (DAR) R307-110-17 and SIP Subsection IX.H.1-4, and establish
emissions limits for PM10, NOX and SO2
for certain stationary sources in the nonattainment areas. These
actions are being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on November 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0298. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Hou, Air Program, EPA, Region 8,
Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303)
312-6210, hou.james@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

Under the 1990 amendments to the CAA, Salt Lake and Utah Counties
were designated nonattainment for PM10 and classified as
moderate areas by operation of law as of November 15, 1990 (56 FR
56694, 56840; November 6, 1991). On July 8, 1994, the EPA approved the
PM10 SIP for the Salt Lake and Utah County Nonattainment
Areas

[[Page 47150]]

(59 FR 35036). The SIP included a demonstration of attainment and
various control measures, including emission limits at stationary
sources.
On January 4, 2016, Utah submitted SIP revisions to R307-110-17
titled ``Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part
H, Emission Limits'' and revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4. The titles
for Subsection IX.H.1-4 include: (1) General Requirements: Control
Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission Limits and Operating
Practices, PM10 Requirements; (2) Source Specific Emission
Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10 Nonattainment/
Maintenance Area; (3) Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah
County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area; and (4) Interim
Emission Limits and Operating Practices. Additionally, on January 19,
2017, Utah submitted revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4. Further
discussion of the revisions to R307-110-17 and Subsection IX.H.1-4 can
be found below.
On July 13, 2017 (82 FR 32287), the EPA proposed to approve certain
SIP revisions to the Salt Lake County and Utah County NAA Moderate area
SIPs submitted by the State. Our proposed notice provides details on
the EPA's evaluation of the State's submittals. The submittals dated
January 4, 2016, and January 19, 2017, contained revisions to the Utah
DAR, Title R307--Environmental Quality, set of rules, and SIP
subsection IX.H.1-4.

II. Response to Comments

The EPA did not receive any comments on the July 13, 2017 proposed
action.

III. Final Action

For the reasons stated in our proposed notice, the EPA is
finalizing approval of revisions to Administrative Rule R307-110-17 and
revisions to Subsection IX.H.1-4 for incorporation into the Utah SIP as
submitted by the State of Utah on January 4, 2016, and January 19,
2017. These revisions establish emissions limitations and related
requirements for certain stationary sources of PM10,
NOX and SO2, and will therefore serve to continue
progress towards attainment and maintenance of the PM10
NAAQS in the nonattainment areas. The revisions reflect more stringent
emission levels for total emissions of PM10, SO2,
and NOX for each of the affected facilities, as well as
updates of the inventory of major stationary sources to accurately
reflect the current sources in both the Salt Lake County and Utah
County nonattainment areas (e.g., removing sources which no longer
exist, or are now covered under an area source rule). The updated list
of sources and revised emission limits for the major stationary sources
in the two nonattainment areas will serve to enhance both area's
ability to attain or maintain the NAAQS.
The specific emission limits and operating practices the EPA is
finalizing for approval are listed in the following tables:

Table 1--Source Specific Emission Limitations in the Salt Lake County PM10 Nonattainment Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concentration based Alternative emission
Source Pollutant Process unit Mass based limits limits limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big West Oil....................... PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 1.037 tons per day
(tpd)
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 0.8 tpd..............
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 0.6 tpd..............
Bountiful City Light and Power..... NOX................... GT#1.................. 0.6 g NOX/kW-hr......
NOX................... GT#2 and GT#3......... 7.5 lb NOX/hr........
Central Valley Water Reclamation NOX................... Facility Wide......... 0.648 tpd............
Facility.
Chevron Products Company........... PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.715 tpd............
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 2.1 tpd..............
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 1.05 tpd.............
Hexcel Corporations................ ...................... ...................... ..................... ..................... 5.50 MMscf natural
gas per day.
...................... ...................... ..................... ..................... 0.061 MM pounds of
carbon fiber
produced per day.
Holly Refining and Marketing PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.416 tpd............
Company.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 2.09 tpd.............
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 0.31 tpd.............
Kennecott Utah Copper: Bingham ...................... ...................... ..................... ..................... Maximum of 30,000
Canyon Mine. miles for waste haul
trucks per day.
...................... ...................... ..................... ..................... Fugitive road dust
emission control
requirements.
Kennecott Copperton Concentrator... ...................... ...................... ..................... ..................... Requirement to
operate a gas
scrubber operated in
accordance with
parametric
monitoring.
Kennecott Utah Copper: Power Plant PM10.................. Power Plant Unit #5... 18.8 lb/hr.
and Tailings Impoundment.
NOX................... Power Plant Unit #5... ..................... 2.0 ppmdv (15% O2
dry).
NOX................... Power Plant Unit #5 395 lb/hr.
Startup/Shutdown.
PM10 (Filterable)..... Units #1, #2, #3, and 0.004 grains/dscf.
#4.
Nov 1-Feb 28/29.......
PM10 (Filterable + Units #1, #2, #3, and 0.03 grains/dscf.
Condensable). #4 Nov 1-Feb 28/29.
NOX................... Units #1, #2, and #3 ..................... 336 ppmdv (3% O2).
Nov 1-Feb 28/29.
NOX................... Unit #4 Nov 1-Feb 28/ ..................... 336 ppmdv (3% O2).
29.
PM10 (Filterable)..... Units #1, #2, and #3; 0.029 grains/dscf.
Mar 1-Oct 1.

[[Page 47151]]

PM10 (Filterable + Units #1, #2, and #3; 0.29 grains/dscf.
Condensable). Mar 1-Oct 1.
PM10 (Filterable)..... Unit #4; Mar 1-Oct 1.. 0.029 grains/dscf.
NOX................... Units #1, #2, and #3; ..................... 426.5 ppmdv (3% O2).
Mar 1-Oct 1.
NOX................... Unit #4; Mar 1-Oct 1.. ..................... 384 ppmdv (3% O2).
Kennecott Utah Copper: Smelter and PM10 (Filterable)..... Main Stack............ 89.5 lb/hr.
Refinery.
PM10 (Filterable + Main Stack............ 439 lb/hr.
Condensable).
SO2 (3-hr rolling avg) Main Stack............ 552 lb/hr.
SO2 (daily avg)....... Main Stack............ 422 lb/hr.
NOX (daily avg)....... Main Stack............ 154 lb/hr.
NOX................... Refinery: Sum of 2 9.5 lb/hr.
tank house boilers.
NOX................... Refinery: Combined 5.96 lb/hr.
Heat Plant.
NOX................... Molybdenum Autoclave 5.01 lb/hr.
Project: Combined
Heat Plant.
PacifiCorp Energy: Gadsby Power NOX................... Steam Unit #1......... 179 lb/hr.
Plant.
NOX................... Steam Unit #2......... 204 lb/hr.
NOX................... Steam Unit #3......... 142 lb./hr. (Nov 1-
Feb 28/29).
NOX................... Steam Unit #3......... 203 lb/hr (Mar 1-Oct
31).
Tesoro Refining and Marketing PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 2.25 tpd.............
Company.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 1.988 tpd.
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 3.1 tpd.
University of Utah................. NOX................... Boiler #3............. ..................... 187 ppmdv (3% O2
Dry).
Boiler #4a & #4b...... ..................... 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Boiler #5a & #5b...... ..................... 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Turbine............... ..................... 9 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
Turbine and WHRU Duct ..................... 15 ppmdv (3% O2 Dry).
burner.
West Valley Power \1\.............. NOX................... Sum of all five 1,050 lb/day.
turbines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ West Valley Power was not a listed source in the 1994 SIP for the Salt Lake County PM10 NAA.

Table 2--Source Specific Emission Limitations in the Utah County PM 10 Nonattainment Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concentration based Alternative emission
Source Pollutant Process unit Mass based limits limits limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brigham Young University........... NOX................... Unit #1 \2\........... 9.55 lb/hr........... 95 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry).
NOX................... Unit #2............... 37.4 lb/hr. 331 ppmdv (7% O2 Dry)
SO2................... Unit #2............... 56.0 lb/hr........... 597 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
NOX................... Unit #3............... 37.4 lb/hr........... 331 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
SO2................... Unit #3............... 56.0 lb/hr........... 597 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
NOX................... Unit #4 \3\........... 19.2 lb/hr........... 127 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
NOX................... Unit #5............... 74.8 lb/hr........... 331 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
SO2................... Unit #5............... 112.07 lb/hr......... 597 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
NOX................... Unit #6 \3\........... 19.2 lb/hr........... 127 ppmdv (7% O2
Dry).
Geneva Nitrogen Inc.: Geneva Plant. PM10.................. Prill Tower........... 0.236 tpd............
PM2.5................. Prill Tower........... 0.196 tpd.
NOX................... Montecatini Plant..... 30.8 lb/hr.
NOX................... Weatherly Plant....... 18.4 lb/hr.
PacifiCorp Energy: Lakeside Power NOX................... Block #1 Turbine/HRSG 14.9 lb/hr.
Plant. Stacks.
NOX................... Block #2 Turbine/HRSG 18.1 lb/hr.
Stacks.
Payson City Corporation: Payson NOX................... All engines combined.. 1.54 tpd.
City Power.
Provo City Power: Power Plant...... NOX................... All engines combined.. 2.45 tpd.
Springville City Corporation: NOX................... All engines combined.. 1.68 tpd.
Whitehead Power Plant.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The NOX limit for Unit #1 is 95 ppm (9.55 lb/hr) until it operates for more than 300 hours during a rolling 12-month period, then the limit will be
36 ppm (5.44 lb/hr). This will be accomplished through the installation of low NOX burners with Flue Gas Recirculation.
\3\ The NOX limit for Units #4 and #6 is 127 ppm (38.5 lb/hr) until December 31, 2018, at which time the limit will then be 36 ppm (19.2 lb/hr).

[[Page 47152]]

Table 3--Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices \4\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concentration based Alternative emission
Source Pollutant Process unit Mass based limits limits limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big West Oil....................... PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.377 tpd Oct 1-Mar
31..
0.407 tpd April 1-
Sept 30.
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 2.764 tpd Oct 1-March
31 3.639 tpd April 1-
Sept 30.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 1.027 tpd Oct 1-Mar
31 1.145 tpd Apr 1 -
Sep 30.
Chevron Products Company........... PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.234 tpd............
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 0.5 tpd.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 2.52 tpd.
Holly Refining and Marketing PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.44 tpd.
Company.
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 4.714 tpd.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 2.20 tpd.
Tesoro Refining and Marketing PM10.................. Facility Wide......... 0.261 tpd.
Company.
SO2................... Facility Wide......... 3.699 tpd Nov 1-Feb
28/29-4.374 tpd Mar
1-Oct 31.
NOX................... Facility Wide......... 1.988 tpd.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This section establishes interim emission limits for sources whose new emission limits under Subsections IX.H.2 and 3 are based on controls that are
not currently installed, with the provision that all necessary controls needed to meet the emission limits under Subsection IX.H.2 and IX.H.3 shall be
installed by January 1, 2019.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Utah
Division of Administrative Rules described in the amendments set forth
to 40 CFR part 52 below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or
at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA
into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and
113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director
of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these
actions merely approve state law as meeting federal requirements and do
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For this reason, these actions:
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Do
not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Do not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP does not apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
final rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

B. Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this

[[Page 47153]]

action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 11, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organization compounds.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: September 25, 2017.
Suzanne J. Bohan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Section 52.2320 is amended as follows:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (c), by revising under the centered
heading ``R307-110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan,''
the table entry for ``R307-110-17'';
0
b. In the table in paragraph (e), by revising under the centered
heading ``IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources,'' the table
entry for ``Section IX.H.1. Fine Particulate Matter (PM10),
Emission Limits and Operating Practices (Utah County)'';
0
c. In the table in paragraph (e), by adding under the centered heading
``IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources.'' table entries for
``Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Salt Lake
County PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;'' ``Section
IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission Limitations in Utah County
PM10 Nonattainment/Maintenance Area;'' and ``Section IX.H.4.
Interim Emission Limits and Operating Practices'' in numerical order.
The revision reads as follows:

Sec. 52.2320 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
(c) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Final rule citation,
Rule No. Rule title effective date date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
R307-110-17................ Section IX, Control 12/8/2016 [Insert Federal Except for Section
Measures for Area Register citation]. IX.H.21.e. which is
and Point Sources, 10/11/2017........... conditionally
Part H, Emission approved through one
Limits. year from 7/5/16,
IX.H.21.g., Sections
of IX.H.21 that
reference and apply
to the source
specific emission
limitations
disapproved in
Section IX.H.22, and
Sections
IX.H.22.a.ii-iii,
IX.H.22.b.ii, and
IX.H.22.c.

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
(e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Rule title effective date Final rule citation, date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
Section IX.H.1. General Requirements: Control 12/3/2015 [Insert Federal Register
Measures for Area and Point Sources, Emission citation]
Limits and Operating Practices, PM10 10/11/2017......................
Requirements.
Section IX.H.2. Source Specific Emission 12/3/2015 [Insert Federal Register
Limitations in Salt Lake County PM10 12/8/2016 citation]
Nonattainment/Maintenance Area. 10/11/2017......................
Section IX.H.3. Source Specific Emission 12/3/2015 [Insert Federal Register
Limitations in Utah County PM10 Nonattainment/ citation]
Maintenance Area. 10/11/2017......................
Section IX.H.4. Interim Emission Limits and 12/3/2015 [Insert Federal Register
Operating Practices. citation]
10/11/2017......................

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47154]]

[FR Doc. 2017-21778 Filed 10-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.