Re-Designation of the Delivery Area for the Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation, Formerly Known as Smith River Rancheria, 47004-47011 [2017-21758]
Download as PDF
47004
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
Dated: October 2, 2017.
Michael D. Weahkee,
Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health
Service, Acting Director, Indian Health
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–21759 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Re-Designation of the Delivery Area for
the Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation, Formerly
Known as Smith River Rancheria
Indian Health Service, HHS.
Final notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services hereby issues this final notice
to re-designate the Purchased/Referred
Care Delivery Area (PRCDA) for the
Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation (Tribe)
(previously known as the Smith River
Rancheria of Smith River, California), to
provide Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)
services to their Tribal members
residing in Curry County, Oregon,
which is in the Portland Area Indian
Health Service (IHS). The Tolowa Deeni’s Tribal Headquarters is located 3
miles south of the California-Oregon
border in Northern California.
The entire State of California,
excluding the counties of Alameda,
Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin,
Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San
Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced,
Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San
Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz,
Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura, was
designated by the IHS as a PRCDA,
formerly known as a Contract Health
Service Delivery Area, in accordance
with statute. The current PRCDA for
Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribal members is the
statutorily specified California PRCDA.
The expanded PRCDA for the Tolowa
Dee-ni’ Tribe includes the statutorily
specified California PRCDA and Curry
County in the State of Oregon.
DATES: This notice shall take effect on
October 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office of
Resource Access and Partnerships,
Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Mail stop: 10E85C, Rockville,
Maryland 20857. Telephone 301/443–
2694 (This is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The IHS currently
provides services under regulations
codified at 42 CFR part 136, subparts A
through C. Subpart C defines a
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Area
(PRCDA) as the geographic area within
which Purchased/Referred Care will be
made available by the Indian Health
Service (IHS) to members of an
identified Indian community who reside
in the Area. PRCDAs were previously
known as Contract Health Service
Delivery Areas (CHSDAs) and more
recently, the IHS referred to them as
Purchased/Referred Care Service
Delivery Areas (PRCSDAs) or PRCDAs,
but the IHS intends to consistently refer
to them as PRCDAs going forward.
Residence in a PRCDA by a person who
is within the scope of the Indian health
program, as set forth in 42 CFR 136.12,
creates no legal entitlement to PRC, only
potential eligibility for services.
Services needed, but not available at an
IHS/Tribal facility, are provided under
the PRC program depending on the
availability of funds, the person’s
relative medical priority, and the actual
availability and accessibility of alternate
resources in accordance with the
regulations.
As applicable to the Tribes, these
regulations provide that, unless
otherwise designated, a PRCDA shall
consist of a county that includes all or
part of a reservation and any county or
counties that have a common boundary
with the reservation, 42 CFR
136.22(a)(6). The regulations also
provide that after consultation with the
Tribal governing body or bodies on
those reservations included within the
PRCDA, the Secretary may from time to
time, re-designate areas within the
United States for inclusion in or
exclusion from a PRCDA. The
regulations require that certain criteria
must be considered before any redesignation is made. The criteria are as
follows:
(1) The number of Indians residing in
the area proposed to be so included or
excluded;
(2) Whether the Tribal governing body
has determined that Indians residing in
the area near the reservation are socially
and economically affiliated with the
Tribe;
(3) The geographic proximity to the
reservation of the area whose inclusion
or exclusion is being considered; and
(4) The level of funding which would
be available for the provision of PRC, 42
CFR 136.22(b).
Additionally, the regulations require
that any re-designation of a PRCDA
must be made in accordance with the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C.
553). See 42 CFR 136.22(c). In
compliance with this requirement, we
are publishing this final notice.
Congress directed the IHS to designate
the entire State of California as a
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
PRCDA, excluding certain counties,
under section 810 of the Indian
Healthcare Improvement Act, Public
Law 94–437, as amended (25 U.S.C.
1680). The IHS has utilized the
congressionally specified PRCDA for the
purposes of administering PRC benefits
to members of the Tribe. Thus, members
of the Tribe who reside outside of the
statutorily established California
PRCDA do not reside within the Tolowa
Dee-ni’s current PRCDA and are
currently not eligible for PRC services.
The IHS has historically established
PRCDAs in accordance with
Congressional intent but has preserved
regulatory flexibility to re-designate
areas as appropriate for inclusion in or
exclusion from PRCDA under PRC
regulations. One of the criteria for such
re-designations is the geographic
proximity of the expanded area to the
existing reservation or PRCDA. Here, the
IHS is expanding the Tribe’s PRCDA
beyond the geographic description in 25
U.S.C. 1680 to include a county adjacent
to the Tribe’s existing PRCDA, in a
neighboring state. There are already
PRCDAs that include part of the State of
California and part of another state, for
example, Cocopah Tribe of Arizona,
(Yuma, Arizona, and Imperial,
California); Colorado River Indian
Tribes of the Colorado River Indian
Reservation, Arizona and California, (La
Paz, Arizona; Riverside, California; San
Bernardino, California; and Yuma,
Arizona); Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of
Arizona, California and Nevada,
(Nevada; Mohave, Arizona; San
Bernardino, California); and the
Quechan Tribe of Fort Yuma Indian
Reservation, California and Arizona,
(Yuma, Arizona; and Imperial,
California).
The Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribe has a
significant number of Tribal members
who are not residents of California. The
Tribe asserts that 177 Tribal members
reside outside of its PRCDA, in Curry
County, in the State of Oregon, and are
not able to access PRC funds from either
the California Area facility (Smith River
Howonquet Indian Health Center) or
from the closest Portland Area facility.
Under 42 CFR 136.23, those otherwise
eligible Indians who do not reside on a
reservation, but reside within a PRCDA
must be either members of the Tribe or
maintain close economic and social ties
with the Tribe. In this case, in applying
the aforementioned PRCDA redesignation criteria required by
operative regulations codified at 42 CFR
part 136, subpart C, the following
findings are made:
1. By expanding, the Tribe estimates
the current eligible population will be
increased by 177.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
2. The Tribe has determined that
these 177 individuals are members of
the Tribe and they are socially and
economically affiliated with the Tribe.
3. The expanded area, including
Curry County in the State of Oregon,
maintains a common boundary with the
State of California and the statutorily
created California PRCDA.
4. Generally, the Tribal members
located in Curry County in the State of
Oregon currently do not use the Indian
health system for their PRC health care
needs. The Tribe will use its existing
Federal allocation for PRC funds to
provide services to the expanded
population. No additional financial
resources will be allocated at this time
by the IHS to the Tribe to provide
services to Tribal members residing in
Curry County in the State of Oregon.
Public Comments: The Agency
received 32 comments, 31 of which
were timely. The Agency carefully
reviewed the submissions. The IHS did
not consider one (1) of these comments,
because it was received after the closing
date. Of the 31 timely comments, 28
commenters supported the proposal to
expand the Tolowa Dee-ni’ PRCDA into
Curry County, Oregon. These included
27 commenters from the California Area
and one Congressional commenter.
There were three (3) commenters
representing two Tribes from the
Portland Area that opposed the PRCDA
expansion. The IHS will address those
comments below:
Comment: The majority of
commenters indicated support for the
proposed PRCDA expansion and
support for providing PRC to the Tribe’s
members living in Curry County,
Oregon.
Response: The IHS appreciates the
comments in support of the expansion
and agrees that the expansion would
allow the Tribe to authorize PRC
services for its members residing in
Curry County, Oregon.
Comment: Two commenters believed
that the IHS should not be relying upon
the Tribe’s estimate of its members
living in Curry County, Oregon, and that
the IHS should either produce its own
estimate or verify the Tribe’s figure.
Response: In 2014, the IHS prepared
a study of the Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribe’s
roster of Tribal Citizens matched with
patient user activity data from the
National Patient Information Reporting
System. The findings of the patient
matching study were consistent with a
previous request conducted in 2013 by
the former IHS California Area Director.
The Federal Register Notice states
that the Smith River Tribe has estimated
that 177 of its Tribal members reside in
Curry County, in the State of Oregon,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
and they are not able to access PRC
funds either at the California Area or the
Portland Area. The IHS believes that
this number is a fair approximation of
the number of Smith River Tribal
members residing in Curry County,
given IHS’s facility data, and
recognizing that the Tribe has additional
resources, such as a Tribal Membership
Roll, to estimate the number of members
residing in Curry County, Oregon,
including those who have not yet sought
services at IHS facilities and therefore
would not be included in IHS data.
Comment: One commenter inquired
about the ‘‘threshold’’ for expanding a
PRCDA and whether there is a
minimum number or percentage in
terms of Tribal members.
Response: Each PRCDA expansion
under consideration must be reviewed
in accordance with the criteria set forth
in 42 CFR 136.22(b), meaning this
decision is a case-by-case determination
based upon the facts of the particular
expansion at issue. Regulations require
the IHS to consider, among other
factors, the ‘‘number of Indians residing
in the area’’ of the proposed expansion,
but the regulations do not require a
minimum number or percentage.
Comment: One commenter asked why
the IHS is advancing the proposal for
the Tribe, after declining to
accommodate requests from Oregon
Tribes and whether this created a
double standard.
Response: Previously, the IHS
restricted certain PRCDA expansions
based on the Agency’s implementation
of the regulatory ‘‘geographic
proximity’’ requirement specified at 42
CFR 136.22(b)(3). While geographic
proximity remains a necessary
consideration in a PRCDA expansion,
the IHS has reconsidered our previous
position and recently adopted a more
flexible approach. The IHS explained
this change in an April 7, 2016, Federal
Register Notice (81 FR 20388), ‘‘Notice
of the Redesignation of the Service
Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe
of Gay Head (Aquinnah).’’
Comment: One commenter asked how
the IHS verified that the Tribal members
residing in Curry County, Oregon, are
economically and socially affiliated
with the Tribe.
Response: Under 42 CFR 136.22(b)(2),
the IHS is required to consider whether
‘‘the Tribal governing body has
determined that Indians residing in the
area near the reservation are socially
and economically affiliated with the
Tribes.’’ The regulation does not require
an independent investigation by the IHS
on this issue. The IHS would typically
defer to the Tribal governing body’s
determination, given the language in the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47005
regulation and a Tribe’s better position
to make this conclusion. However, the
IHS would note that the Tribe’s estimate
for the expanded population includes
only its members residing in Curry
County, Oregon, and its members are
eligible for PRC under 42 CFR 136.23,
as long as the members reside within
the PRCDA.
Comment: Two commenters inquired
about the financial aspects of the
expansion, such as how this proposal
would be paid for and what would be
the motivation, since no additional
funds are being provided to the Tribe.
Response: Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribal
members living in Curry County,
Oregon, are unfunded for both IHS
direct care and PRC resources. A few
Tribal members have sought direct
services from Tribal health programs in
Oregon. While these individuals can
receive direct services at the Oregon
programs, no funds are allocated to the
Portland Area IHS or the California Area
IHS to provide services to members of
the Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribe residing in
Curry County. The Agency is approving
the requested PRCDA expansion to
allow the Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribe to
authorize the purchase of PRC services,
within existing funds, for members of
the Tribe who reside in Curry County.
Without this expansion, such purchases
would not be lawful and those Tribal
members would not be eligible to
receive PRC services. Since there are no
additional funds being provided by the
IHS for the PRCDA expansion, the
Tribe’s current level of PRC funding will
be available to serve a larger population.
Comment: One commenter inquired
about the potential future financial
impact on Oregon Tribes and how this
could be accurately measured, given the
current data.
Response: Per Agency policy,
expanding a PRCDA does not
automatically increase the funding to a
Tribe. Tribes will continue to use
existing Federal allocation for PRC
funds to provide services to expanding
population until Congress appropriates
additional funding. Each IHS Area will
distribute future increases based on
their own methodologies. The Tribe
may benefit from future increases to
PRC funding because of the additional
active users from the PRCDA expansion,
but the IHS determined that there will
be very little to no financial impact as
a result of the expansion on Portland
Area Tribes.
Comment: One commenter inquired
about the status of a proposed pilot
project for an Area-wide PRCDA in the
Portland Area IHS.
Response: The Coquille Tribe
presented a suggestion for consideration
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
47006
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
to the IHS Portland Area Funds
Distribution Workgroup (FDWG). The
FDWG is a Tribal consultative body that
serves as a resource to the Portland Area
Director on any Indian health system
funds issue. The principal function of
the FDWG is to develop
recommendations regarding resource
allocation within the Portland Area IHS.
The IHS anticipates announcing a plan
of action on this issue soon.
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE DELIVERY AREAS
Tribe/reservation
County/state
Ak Chin Indian Community .......................................................................
Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas ........................................................
Alaska .......................................................................................................
Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming ......................
Aroostook Band of Micmacs ....................................................................
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation,
Montana.
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the
Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin.
Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan ....................................................
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana ............
Brigham City Intermountain School Health Center, Utah. Permanently
Closed on May 17, 1984.
Burns Paiute Tribe ....................................................................................
California ...................................................................................................
Catawba Indian Nation .............................................................................
Pinal, AZ.
Polk, TX.1
Entire State.2
Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Sublette, WY.
Aroostook, ME.3
Daniels, MT, McCone, MT, Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan,
MT, Valley, MT.
Ashland, WI, Iron, WI.
Cayuga Nation ..........................................................................................
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South
Dakota.
Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, Montana ........
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana ..................................................................
Cocopah Tribe of Arizona ........................................................................
Coeur D’Alene Tribe .................................................................................
Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation,
Arizona and California.
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation ..........................
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon ....................................
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation ...................................
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation .....................................
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Nevada and Utah .....
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon ...........
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation .........................
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon ........
Coquille Indian Tribe ................................................................................
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana ...................................................................
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians .........................................
Cowlitz Indian Tribe ..................................................................................
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Crow Tribe of Montana .............................................................................
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians ..........................................................
Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming ........
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota ......................................
Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin .................................
Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of
Montana.
Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada and Oregon.
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona ..................................................
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California and Nevada ..................
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Michigan ........
Hannahville Indian Community, Michigan ................................................
Haskell Indian Health Center ...................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Chippewa, MI.
Glacier, MT, Pondera, MT.
(4)
Harney, OR.
Entire State, except for the counties listed in the footnote.5
All Counties in SC,6 Cabarrus, NC, Cleveland, NC, Gaston, NC, Mecklenburg, NC, Rutherford, NC, Union, NC.
Alleghany, NY,7 Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren,
PA.
Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Haakon, SD, Meade, SD, Perkins, SD, Potter, SD, Stanley, SD, Sully, SD, Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD.
Chouteau, MT, Hill, MT, Liberty, MT.
St. Mary Parish, LA.
Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Benewah, ID, Kootenai, ID, Latah, ID, Spokane, WA, Whitman, WA.
La Paz, AZ, Riverside, CA, San Bernardino, CA, Yuma, AZ.
Flathead, MT, Lake, MT, Missoula, MT, Sanders, MT.
Klickitat, WA, Lewis, WA, Skamania, WA,8 Yakima, WA.
Benton, OR,9 Clackamas, OR, Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR, Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR, Polk, OR, Tillamook, OR, Washington, OR,
Yamhill, OR.
Grays Harbor, WA, Lewis, WA, Thurston, WA.
Chelan, WA,10 Douglas, WA, Ferry, WA, Grant, WA, Lincoln, WA,
Okanogan, WA, Stevens, WA.
Coos, OR,11 Curry, OR, Douglas, OR, Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR.
Nevada, Juab, UT, Toole, UT.
Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR, Polk, OR,12 Tillamook, OR, Washington,
OR, Yamhill, OR.
Umatilla, OR, Union, OR.
Clackamas, OR, Jefferson, OR, Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Wasco, OR.
Coos, OR, Curry, OR, Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR, Lane, OR.
Allen Parish, LA, Elton, LA.13
Coos, OR,14 Deshutes, OR, Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR, Josephine,
OR, Klamath, OR, Lane, OR.
Clark, WA, Cowlitz, WA, King, WA, Lewis, WA, Peirce, WA, Skamania,
WA, Thurston, WA, Columbia, OR,15 Kittitas, WA, Wahkiakum, WA.
Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hand, SD, Hughes, SD, Hyde, SD, Lyman, SD,
Stanley, SD.
Big Horn, MT, Carbon, MT, Treasure, MT,16 Yellowstone, MT, Big
Horn, WY, Sheridan, WY.
Cherokee, NC, Graham, NC, Haywood, NC, Jackson, NC, Swain, NC.
Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Sublette, WY.
Moody, SD.
Forest, WI, Marinette, WI, Oconto, WI.
Blaine, MT, Phillips, MT.
Nevada, Malheur, OR.
Maricopa, AZ.
Nevada, Mohave, AZ, San Bernardino, CA.
Maricopa, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
Antrim, MI,17 Benzie, MI, Charlevoix, MI, Grand Traverse, MI,
Leelanau, MI, Manistee, MI.
Delta, MI, Menominee, MI.
Douglas, KS.18
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
47007
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/reservation
County/state
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai ...........................................................
Reservation, Arizona ................................................................................
Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin ................................................................
Hoh Indian Tribe .......................................................................................
Hopi Tribe of Arizona ...............................................................................
Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians ............................................................
Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai Indian Reservation, Arizona ........
Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska ........................................................
Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe ......................................................................
Jena Band of Choctaw Indians ................................................................
Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico .......................................................
Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Kalispel Indian Community of the Kalispel Reservation ..........................
Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico ......................................................................
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan ..........................................
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas ........................................................
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas .........
Klamath Tribes .........................................................................................
Koi Nation of Northern California (formerly known as Lower Lake
Rancheria, California).
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho ............................................................................
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin ..
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Lac
du Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin.
Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Michigan .........................................
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan ..........................
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule Reservation, South Dakota
Lower Elwha Tribal Community ...............................................................
Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota ......................
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation ...................................................
Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation .............................
Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe ..........................................................
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe ....................................................................
Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan ....
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin .....................................................
Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico ....
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians ....................................................................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake) ....
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Fond du Lac Band ....................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Grand Portage Band ................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Leech Lake Band .....................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Mille Lacs Band ........................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, White Earth Band .....................
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians .......................................................
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut ................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe .........................................................................
Narragansett Indian Tribe .........................................................................
Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico, & Utah .........................................
Nevada .....................................................................................................
Nez Perce Tribe .......................................................................................
Nisqually Indian Tribe ...............................................................................
Nooksack Indian Tribe ..............................................................................
Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Coconino, AZ.
Adams, WI,19 Clark, WI, Columbia, WI, Crawford, WI, Dane, WI, Eau
Claire, WI, Houston, MN, Jackson, WI, Juneau, WI, La Crosse, WI,
Marathon, WI, Monroe, WI, Sauk, WI, Shawano, WI, Vernon, WI,
Wood, WI.
Jefferson, WA.
Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Navajo, AZ.
Aroostook, ME.20
Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Yavapai, AZ.
Brown, KS, Doniphan, KS, Richardson, NE.
Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Grand Parish, LA,21 LaSalle Parish, LA, Rapides, LA.
Archuleta, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Kane, UT.
Pend Oreille, WA, Spokane, WA.
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Baraga, MI, Houghton, MI, Ontonagon, MI.
Maverick, TX.22
Brown, KS, Jackson, KS.
Klamath, OR.23
Lake, CA, Sonoma, CA.24
Boundary, ID.
Sawyer, WI.
Iron, WI, Oneida, WI, Vilas, WI.
Gogebic, MI.
Kent, MI,25 Muskegon, MI, Newaygo, MI, Oceana, MI, Ottawa, MI,
Manistee, MI, Mason, MI, Wexford, MI, Lake, MI.
Alcona, MI,26 Alger, MI, Alpena, MI, Antrim, MI, Benzie, MI, Charlevoix,
MI, Cheboygan, MI, Chippewa, MI, Crawford, MI, Delta, MI, Emmet,
MI, Grand Traverse, MI, Iosco, MI, Kalkaska, MI, Leelanau, MI,
Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Manistee, MI, Missaukee, MI, Montmorency,
MI, Ogemaw, MI, Oscoda, MI, Otsego, MI, Presque Isle, MI,
Schoolcraft, MI, Roscommon, MI, Wexford, MI.
Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hughes, SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Clallam, WA.
Redwood, MN, Renville, MN.
Whatcom, WA.
Clallam, WA.
New London, CT.27
Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA, Suffolk,
MA.28
Allegan, MI,29 Barry, MI, Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI.
Langlade, WI, Menominee, WI, Oconto, WI, Shawano, WI.
Chaves, NM, Lincoln, NM, Otero, NM.
Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-Dade, FL, Hendry, FL.
Itasca, MN, Koochiching, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Carlton, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Cook, MN.
Beltrami, MN, Cass, MN, Hubbard, MN, Itasca, MN.
Aitkin, MN, Kanebec, MN, Mille Lacs, MN, Pine, MN.
Becker, MN, Clearwater, MN, Mahnomen, MN, Norman, MN, Polk, MN.
Attala, MS, Jasper, MS,30 Jones, MS, Kemper, MS, Leake, MS,
Neshoba, MS, Newton, MS, Noxubee, MS,31 Scott, MS,32 Winston,
MS.
Fairfield, CT, Hartford, CT, Litchfield, CT, Middlesex, CT, New Haven,
CT, New London, CT, Tolland, CT, Windham, CT.
King, WA, Pierce, WA.
Washington, RI.33
Apache, AZ, Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM, Coconino, AZ, Kane, UT,
McKinley, NM, Montezuma, CO, Navajo, AZ, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM, San Juan, NM, San Juan, UT, Socorro, NM, Valencia, NM.
Entire State.34
Clearwater, ID, Idaho, ID, Latah, ID, Lewis, ID, Nez Perce, ID.
Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Whatcom, WA.
Big Horn, MT, Carter, MT,35 Rosebud, MT.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
47008
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/reservation
County/state
Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation ..................................................
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Pottawatomi, Michigan .......................
Box Elder, UT.36
Allegan, MI,37 Barry, MI, Branch, MI, Calhoun, MI, Kalamazoo, MI,
Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI.
Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Custer, SD, Dawes, NE, Fall River, SD,
Jackson, SD,38 Mellette, SD, Pennington, SD, Shannon, SD, Sheridan, NE, Todd, SD.
Rio Arriba, NM.
Entire State.39
Burt, NE, Cuming, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE.
Brown, WI, Outagamie, WI.
Chenango, NY, Cortland, NY, Herkimer, NY, Madison, NY, Oneida,
NY, Onondaga, NY.
Onondaga, NY.
Iron, UT,40 Millard, UT, Sevier, UT, Washington, UT.
Caroline, Hanover, Henrico, King William, King and Queen, New Kent,
Richmond (Independent City).41
Pima, AZ.42
Aroostook, ME,43 44 Hancock, ME,45 Washington, ME.
Aroostook, ME 46, Penobscot, ME.
Baldwin, AL,47 Elmore, AL, Escambia, AL, Mobile, AL, Monroe, AL,
Escambia, FL.
Allegan, MI,48 Berrien, MI, Cass, MI, Elkhart, IN, Kosciusko, IN, La
Porte, IN, Marshall, IN, St. Joseph, IN, Starke, IN, Van Buren, MI.
Boyd, NE,49 Burt, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, NE, Hall, NE, Holt,
NE, Knox, NE, Lancaster, NE, Madison, NE, Platte, NE,
Pottawatomie, IA, Sarpy, NE, Stanton, NE, Wayne, NE, Woodbury,
IA.
Kitsap, WA.
Jackson, KS.
Goodhue, MN.
Cibola, NM.
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Torrance, NM, Valencia, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM, Sandoval, NM, Valencia, NM.
Santa Fe, NM.
Taos, NM.
Rio Arriba, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Los Alamos, NM, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Los Alamos, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Colfax, NM, Taos, NM.
Santa Fe, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
King, WA, Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Oglala Sioux Tribe ....................................................................................
Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico ..................................................................
Oklahoma .................................................................................................
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska ........................................................................
Oneida Nation ...........................................................................................
Oneida Nation of New York .....................................................................
Onondaga Nation .....................................................................................
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah ......................................................................
Pamunkey Indian Tribe ............................................................................
Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona ................................................................
Passamaquoddy Tribe ..............................................................................
Penobscot Nation .....................................................................................
Poarch Band of Creeks ............................................................................
Pokagon Band of Pottawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana ...............
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska .........................................................................
Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe ....................................................................
Prairie Band of Pottawatomi Nation .........................................................
Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota ....................
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico ...................................................................
Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico .................................................................
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico ...............................................................
Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico ............................................................
Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico ..........................................................
Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico .....................................................
Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico ..........................................................
Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico ........................................................
Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico ...................................................................
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico .............................................................
Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico ......................................................................
Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation .............................................
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, Arizona and California.
Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Reservation ..............................................
Quinault Indian Nation ..............................................................................
Rapid City, South Dakota .........................................................................
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin ..........
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Minnesota ....................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska .........................
Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa ..............................................
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan ...........................................
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe .......................................................................
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona.
Samish Indian Nation ...............................................................................
San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos Reservation, Arizona .........
San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona ............................................
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska ...............................................................
Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe ........................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Grays Harbor, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Pennington, SD.50
Bayfield, WI.
Beltrami, MN, Clearwater, MN, Koochiching, MN, Lake of the Woods,
MN, Marshall, MN, Pennington, MN, Polk, MN, Roseau, MN.
Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Gregory, SD, Lyman, SD, Mellette, SD,
Todd, SD, Tripp, SD.
Brown, KS, Richardson, NE.
Tama, IA.
Arenac, MI,51 Clare, MI, Isabella, MI, Midland, MI, Missaukee, MI.
Franklin, NY, St. Lawrence, NY.
Maricopa, AZ.
Clallam, WA,52 Island, WA, Jefferson, WA, King, WA, Kitsap, WA,
Pierce, WA, San Juan, WA, Skagit, WA, Snohomish, WA, Whatcom,
WA.
Apache, AZ, Cochise, AZ, Gila, AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Pinal,
AZ.
Coconino, AZ, San Juan, UT.
Bon Homme, SD, Knox, NE.
Snohomish, WA, Skagit, WA.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
47009
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/reservation
County/state
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan ............................
Alger, MI,53 Chippewa, MI, Delta, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Marquette, MI, Schoolcraft, MI.
Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-Dade, FL, Glades, FL, Hendry, FL.
Alleghany, NY, Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren,
PA.
Scott, MN.
Nassau, NY,54 Suffolk, NY.
Pacific, WA.
Bannock, ID, Bingham, ID, Caribou, ID, Lemhi, ID,55 Power, ID.
Nevada, Owyhee, ID.
Codington, SD, Day, SD, Grant, SD, Marshall, SD, Richland, ND, Roberts, SD, Sargent, ND, Traverse, MN.
Mason, WA.
Tooele, UT.
King, WA,56 Snohomish, WA, Pierce, WA, Island, WA, Mason, WA.
Forest, WI.
Archuleta, CO, La Plata, CO, Montezuma, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, San
Juan, NM.
Benson, ND, Eddy, ND, Nelson, ND, Ramsey, ND.
Ferry, WA, Lincoln, WA, Stevens, WA.
Mason, WA.
Barron, WI, Burnett, WI, Pine, MN, Polk, WI, Washburn, WI.
Adams, ND, Campbell, SD, Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Emmons, ND,
Grant, ND, Morton, ND, Perkins, SD, Sioux, ND, Walworth, SD,
Ziebach, SD.
Snohomish, WA.
Menominee, WI, Shawano, WI.
Kitsap, WA.
Skagit, WA.
Kern, CA.57
Dunn, ND, Mercer, ND, McKenzie, ND, McLean, ND, Mountrail, ND,
Ward, ND.
Maricopa, AZ, Pima, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
Genesee, NY, Erie, NY, Niagara, NY.
California, Curry, OR.58
Seminole Tribe of Florida .........................................................................
Seneca Nation of Indians .........................................................................
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Minnesota ......................
Shinnecock Indian Nation .........................................................................
Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation ...........
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation .........................
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, Nevada .........
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South
Dakota.
Skokomish Indian Tribe ............................................................................
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah .........................................
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe ..........................................................................
Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Wisconsin ..........................................
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado ..
Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota ................................................................
Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation ............................................
Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Island Reservation .........................
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin ................................................
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota ..............................
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington ..........................................
Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin ...........................................
Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation ......................
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community ........................................................
Tejon Indian Tribe ....................................................................................
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota ..
Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona .........................................................
Tonawanda Band of Seneca ....................................................................
Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation (formerly known as Smith River Rancheria of
California).
Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona ................................................................
Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana ...................................
Tulalip Tribes of Washington ....................................................................
Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe .........................................................................
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota ..................
Tuscarora Nation ......................................................................................
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota ........................................................
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe ........................................................................
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation, Utah .....................
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe ............................................................................
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) ...........................................
Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California .....................................................
White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona
Wilton Rancheria, California .....................................................................
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska .................................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota ......................................................
Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe ..................................................................
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas ...............................................................
Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico ....................................
Gila, AZ.
Divide, ND,59 McKenzie, ND, Williams, ND, Richland, MT, Roosevelt,
MT, Sheridan, MT.
Snohomish, WA.
Avoyelles, LA, Rapides, LA.60
Rolette, ND.
Niagara, NY.
Chippewa, MN, Yellow Medicine, MN.
Skagit, WA.
Carbon, UT, Daggett, UT, Duchesne, UT, Emery, UT, Grand, UT, Rio
Blanco, CO, Summit, UT, Uintah, UT, Utah, UT, Wasatch, UT.
Apache, AZ, La Plata, CO, Montezuma, CO, San Juan, NM, San Juan,
UT.
Dukes, MA,61 Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA,
Suffolk, MA.62
Nevada, California except for the counties listed in footnote.
Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Gila, AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Navajo, AZ.
Sacramento, CA.63
Dakota, NE, Dixon, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE,
Woodbury, IA.
Bon Homme, SD, Boyd, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, SD, Gregory,
SD, Hutchinson, SD, Knox, NE.
Yavapai, AZ.
Yavapai, AZ.
El Paso, TX.64
Apache, AZ, Cibola, NM, McKinley, NM, Valencia, NM.
1 Public Law 100–89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ‘‘members
of the Tribe’’ by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
2 Entire State of Alaska is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(1)).
3 Aroostook Band of Micmacs was recognized by Congress on November 26, 1991, through the Aroostook Band of Micmac Settlement Act.
Aroostook County, ME, was defined as the SDA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
47010
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
4 Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is
based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services
have been provided at Brigham City Intermountain School Health Center, Utah (Pub. L. 88–358). The Brigham Intermountain School Health Center was renamed to Intermountain Inter-Tribal School in 1974 and was permanently closed on May 17, 1984.
5 Entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San
Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura, is
designated a CHSDA (25 U.S.C. 1680).
6 The counties were recognized after the January 1984 CHSDA FRN was published, in accordance with Public Law 103–116, Catawba Indian
Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, dated October 27, 1993.
7 There is no reservation for the Cayuga Nation; the service delivery area consists of those counties identified by the Cayuga Nation.
8 Skamania County, WA, has historically been a part of the Yakama Service Unit population since 1979.
9 In order to carry out the Congressional intent of the Siletz Restoration Act, Public Law 95–195, as expressed in H. Report No. 95–623, at
page 4, members of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon residing in these counties are eligible for contract health services.
10 Chelan County, WA, has historically been a part of the Colville Service Unit population since 1970.
11 Pursuant to Public Law 98–481 (H. Rept. No. 98–904), Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Restoration Act, members of the Tribe residing in
these counties were specified as eligible for Federal services and benefits without regard to the existence of a Federal Indian reservation.
12 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon were recognized by Public Law 98–165 which was signed into law on November 22, 1983, and provides for eligibility in these six counties without regard to the existence of a reservation.
13 The CHSDA for the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana was expanded administratively by the Director, IHS, through regulation (42 CFR 136.22(6))
to include city limits of Elton, LA.
14 Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians recognized by Public Law 97–391, signed into law on December 29, 1983. House Rept. No.
97–862 designates Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties as a service area without regard to the existence of a reservation. The IHS later
administratively expanded the CHSDA to include the counties of Coos, OR, Deschutes, OR, Klamath, OR, and Lane, OR.
15 The Cowlitz Indian Tribe was recognized in July 2002 as documented at 67 FR 46329, July 12, 2002. The counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–
638. The CHSDA was administratively expanded to included Columbia County, OR, Kittitas, WA, and Wahkiakum County, WA, as published at
67884 FR December 21, 2009.
16 Treasure County, MT, has historically been a part of the Crow Service Unit population.
17 The counties listed have historically been a part of the Grand Traverse Service Unit population since 1980.
18 Haskell Indian Health Center has historically been a part of Kansas Service Unit since 1979. Special programs have been established by
Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation
of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at Haskell Indian Health Center
(H. Rept. No. 95–392).
19 CHSDA counties for the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(5)). Dane County, WI, was added
to the reservation by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1986.
20 Public Law 97–428 provides that any member of the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians in or around the Town of Houlton shall be eligible
without regard to existence of a reservation.
21 The Jena Band of Choctaw Indian was Federally acknowledged as documented at 60 FR 28480, May 31, 1995. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public
Law 93–638.
22 Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, formerly known as the Texas Band of Kickapoo, was recognized by Public Law 97–429, signed into law
on January 8, 1983. The Act provides for eligibility for Kickapoo Tribal members residing in Maverick County without regard to the existence of a
reservation.
23 The Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act (Pub. L. 99–398, Sec. 2(2)) states that for the purpose of Federal services and benefits ‘‘members
of the tribe residing in Klamath County shall be deemed to be residing in or near a reservation’’.
24 The Koi Nation of Northern California, formerly known as the Lower Lake Rancheria, was reaffirmed by the Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs on December 29, 2000. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRCDA, for the purposes
of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
25 The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant to Public Law 103–324, Sec. 4(b) the counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
26 The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant to Public Law 103–324, Sec. 4(b) the counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
27 Mashantucket Pequot Indian Claims Settlement Act, Public Law 98–134, signed into law on October 18, 1983, provides a reservation for the
Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe in New London County, CT.
28 The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in February 2007, as documented at 72 FR 8007, February 22, 2007. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Public Law 93–638.
29 The Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan was recognized in October 1998, as documented at 63 FR 56936,
October 23, 1998. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a
CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
30 Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health services;
these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR 136.22.
31Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health services;
these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR 136.22.
32 Scott County, MS, has historically been a part of the Choctaw Service Unit population since 1970.
33 The Narragansett Indian Tribe was recognized by Public Law 95–395, signed into law September 30, 1978. Lands in Washington County,
RI, are now Federally restricted and the Bureau of Indian Affairs considers them as the Narragansett Indian Reservation.
34 Entire State of Nevada is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(2)).
35 Carter County, MT, has historically been a part of the Northern Cheyenne Service Unit population since 1979.
36 Land of Box Elder County, Utah, was taken into trust for the Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation in 1986.
37 The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan, formerly known as the Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc., was recognized in December 1995, as documented at 60 FR 66315, December 21, 1995. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function
as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
38 Washabaugh County, SD, merged and became part of Jackson County, SD, in 1983; both were/are CHSDA counties for the Oglala Sioux
Tribe.
39 Entire State of Oklahoma is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(3)).
40 Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act, Public Law 96–227, provides for the extension of services for the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah to
these four counties without regard to the existence of a reservation.
41 In the Federal Register on July 08, 2015 (80 FR 39144), the Pamunkey Indian Tribe was officially recognized as an Indian Tribe within the
meaning of Federal law. The counties listed were designated administratively as the Tribe’s PRCDA, as announced in the Federal Register on
July 28, 2017 (82 FR 35227).
42 Legislative history (H.R. Report No. 95–1021) to Public Law 95–375, Extension of Federal Benefits to Pascua Yaqui Indians, Arizona, expresses congressional intent that lands conveyed to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona pursuant to Act of October 8, 1964. (Pub. L. 88–350)
shall be deemed a Federal Indian Reservation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
47011
43 The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–420; H. Rept. 96–1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide
contract health services to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation.
44 The Passamaquoddy Tribe has two reservations: Indian Township and Pleasant Point. The PRCDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe at Indian
Township, ME, is Aroostook County, ME, Washington County, ME, and Hancock County, ME. The PRCDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe at
Pleasant Point, ME, is Washington County, ME, south of State Route 9, and Aroostook County, ME.
45 The Passamaquoddy Tribe’s counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRCDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
46 The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–420; H. Rept. 96–1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide
PRC to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation.
47 Counties in the Service Unit designated by Congress for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (see H. Rept. 98–886, June 29, 1984; Cong.
Record, October 10, 1984, Pg. H11929).
48 Public Law 103–323 restored Federal recognition to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana, in 1994 and identified
counties to serve as the SDA.
49 The Ponca Restoration Act, Public Law 101–484, recognized members of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in Boyd, Douglas, Knox, Madison or
Lancaster counties of Nebraska or Charles Mix county of South Dakota as residing on or near a reservation. Public Law 104–109 made technical
corrections to laws relating to Native Americans and added Burt, Hall, Holt, Platte, Sarpy, Stanton, and Wayne counties of Nebraska and
Pottawatomie and Woodbury counties of Iowa to the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska SDA.
50 Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is
based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility, rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services
have been provided at Rapid City (S. Rept. No. 1154, FY 1967 Interior Approp. 89th Cong. 2d Sess.).
51 Historically part of Isabella Reservation Area for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Eastern Michigan Service Unit population since 1979.
52The Samish Indian Tribe Nation was Federally acknowledged in April 1996 as documented at 61 FR 15825, April 9, 1996. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
53 CHSDA counties for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan, were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(4)).
54 The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June 2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
55 Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall Service Unit population since 1979.
56 The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August 1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties
listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
57 On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe. The
county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
58 The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
59 The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians that
reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota and the adjoining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94–437).
60 Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982.
61 According to Public Law 100–95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha’s Vineyard are
deemed to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of eligibility for Federal services.
62 The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRCDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93–638.
63 The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento
County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress originally established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680).
64 Public Law 100–89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ‘‘members
of the Tribe’’ by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
Dated: October 2, 2017.
Michael D. Weahkee,
RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S.
Public Health Service, Acting Director, Indian
Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–21758 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Office of the Director; Notice of
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, notice is hereby given of a
meeting of the NIH Clinical Center
Research Hospital Board.
The meeting will be open to the
public as indicated below, with
attendance limited to space available.
Individuals who plan to attend and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
need special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
notify the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting.
The portion of the meeting devoted to
the identification and evaluation of
specific candidates for consideration for
leadership positions in the Clinical
Center will be closed to the public in
accordance with the provisions set forth
in section 552b(c)(9)(B) and 552b(c)(6),
Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. Premature
disclosure of potential candidates and
their qualifications, as well as the
discussions by the committee, could
significantly frustrate NIH’s ability to
recruit these individuals and the
consideration of personnel
qualifications, performance, and the
competence of individuals as candidates
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: NIH Clinical Center
Research Hospital Board.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date: October 20, 2017.
Open: 9:00 a.m. to 3:45 p.m.
Agenda: Patient Safety Racking and
Reporting System; Quality Improvement
Assessment Results; IRB Consolidation.
Place: National Institutes of Health
Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Closed: 3:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: Identification of Candidates for
Leadership Role.
Place: National Institutes of Health
Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Contact Person: Gretchen Wood, Staff
Assistant, Office of the Director, National
Institutes of Health, One Center Drive,
Building 1, Room 126, Bethesda, MD 20892,
301–496–4272, woodgs@od.nih.gov.
Any interested person may file
written comments with the committee
by forwarding the statement to the
Contact Person listed on this notice. The
statement should include the name,
address, telephone number and when
applicable, the business or professional
affiliation of the interested person.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47004-47011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21758]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Re-Designation of the Delivery Area for the Tolowa Dee-ni'
Nation, Formerly Known as Smith River Rancheria
AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
hereby issues this final notice to re-designate the Purchased/Referred
Care Delivery Area (PRCDA) for the Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation (Tribe)
(previously known as the Smith River Rancheria of Smith River,
California), to provide Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) services to their
Tribal members residing in Curry County, Oregon, which is in the
Portland Area Indian Health Service (IHS). The Tolowa Dee-ni's Tribal
Headquarters is located 3 miles south of the California-Oregon border
in Northern California.
The entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda,
Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco,
San Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San
Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura,
was designated by the IHS as a PRCDA, formerly known as a Contract
Health Service Delivery Area, in accordance with statute. The current
PRCDA for Tolowa Dee-ni' Tribal members is the statutorily specified
California PRCDA. The expanded PRCDA for the Tolowa Dee-ni' Tribe
includes the statutorily specified California PRCDA and Curry County in
the State of Oregon.
DATES: This notice shall take effect on October 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office
of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mail stop: 10E85C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone
301/443-2694 (This is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The IHS currently provides services under regulations
codified at 42 CFR part 136, subparts A through C. Subpart C defines a
Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Area (PRCDA) as the geographic area
within which Purchased/Referred Care will be made available by the
Indian Health Service (IHS) to members of an identified Indian
community who reside in the Area. PRCDAs were previously known as
Contract Health Service Delivery Areas (CHSDAs) and more recently, the
IHS referred to them as Purchased/Referred Care Service Delivery Areas
(PRCSDAs) or PRCDAs, but the IHS intends to consistently refer to them
as PRCDAs going forward. Residence in a PRCDA by a person who is within
the scope of the Indian health program, as set forth in 42 CFR 136.12,
creates no legal entitlement to PRC, only potential eligibility for
services. Services needed, but not available at an IHS/Tribal facility,
are provided under the PRC program depending on the availability of
funds, the person's relative medical priority, and the actual
availability and accessibility of alternate resources in accordance
with the regulations.
As applicable to the Tribes, these regulations provide that, unless
otherwise designated, a PRCDA shall consist of a county that includes
all or part of a reservation and any county or counties that have a
common boundary with the reservation, 42 CFR 136.22(a)(6). The
regulations also provide that after consultation with the Tribal
governing body or bodies on those reservations included within the
PRCDA, the Secretary may from time to time, re-designate areas within
the United States for inclusion in or exclusion from a PRCDA. The
regulations require that certain criteria must be considered before any
re-designation is made. The criteria are as follows:
(1) The number of Indians residing in the area proposed to be so
included or excluded;
(2) Whether the Tribal governing body has determined that Indians
residing in the area near the reservation are socially and economically
affiliated with the Tribe;
(3) The geographic proximity to the reservation of the area whose
inclusion or exclusion is being considered; and
(4) The level of funding which would be available for the provision
of PRC, 42 CFR 136.22(b).
Additionally, the regulations require that any re-designation of a
PRCDA must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act
(5 U.S.C. 553). See 42 CFR 136.22(c). In compliance with this
requirement, we are publishing this final notice. Congress directed the
IHS to designate the entire State of California as a PRCDA, excluding
certain counties, under section 810 of the Indian Healthcare
Improvement Act, Public Law 94-437, as amended (25 U.S.C. 1680). The
IHS has utilized the congressionally specified PRCDA for the purposes
of administering PRC benefits to members of the Tribe. Thus, members of
the Tribe who reside outside of the statutorily established California
PRCDA do not reside within the Tolowa Dee-ni's current PRCDA and are
currently not eligible for PRC services.
The IHS has historically established PRCDAs in accordance with
Congressional intent but has preserved regulatory flexibility to re-
designate areas as appropriate for inclusion in or exclusion from PRCDA
under PRC regulations. One of the criteria for such re-designations is
the geographic proximity of the expanded area to the existing
reservation or PRCDA. Here, the IHS is expanding the Tribe's PRCDA
beyond the geographic description in 25 U.S.C. 1680 to include a county
adjacent to the Tribe's existing PRCDA, in a neighboring state. There
are already PRCDAs that include part of the State of California and
part of another state, for example, Cocopah Tribe of Arizona, (Yuma,
Arizona, and Imperial, California); Colorado River Indian Tribes of the
Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California, (La Paz,
Arizona; Riverside, California; San Bernardino, California; and Yuma,
Arizona); Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California and Nevada,
(Nevada; Mohave, Arizona; San Bernardino, California); and the Quechan
Tribe of Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California and Arizona, (Yuma,
Arizona; and Imperial, California).
The Tolowa Dee-ni' Tribe has a significant number of Tribal members
who are not residents of California. The Tribe asserts that 177 Tribal
members reside outside of its PRCDA, in Curry County, in the State of
Oregon, and are not able to access PRC funds from either the California
Area facility (Smith River Howonquet Indian Health Center) or from the
closest Portland Area facility.
Under 42 CFR 136.23, those otherwise eligible Indians who do not
reside on a reservation, but reside within a PRCDA must be either
members of the Tribe or maintain close economic and social ties with
the Tribe. In this case, in applying the aforementioned PRCDA re-
designation criteria required by operative regulations codified at 42
CFR part 136, subpart C, the following findings are made:
1. By expanding, the Tribe estimates the current eligible
population will be increased by 177.
[[Page 47005]]
2. The Tribe has determined that these 177 individuals are members
of the Tribe and they are socially and economically affiliated with the
Tribe.
3. The expanded area, including Curry County in the State of
Oregon, maintains a common boundary with the State of California and
the statutorily created California PRCDA.
4. Generally, the Tribal members located in Curry County in the
State of Oregon currently do not use the Indian health system for their
PRC health care needs. The Tribe will use its existing Federal
allocation for PRC funds to provide services to the expanded
population. No additional financial resources will be allocated at this
time by the IHS to the Tribe to provide services to Tribal members
residing in Curry County in the State of Oregon.
Public Comments: The Agency received 32 comments, 31 of which were
timely. The Agency carefully reviewed the submissions. The IHS did not
consider one (1) of these comments, because it was received after the
closing date. Of the 31 timely comments, 28 commenters supported the
proposal to expand the Tolowa Dee-ni' PRCDA into Curry County, Oregon.
These included 27 commenters from the California Area and one
Congressional commenter. There were three (3) commenters representing
two Tribes from the Portland Area that opposed the PRCDA expansion. The
IHS will address those comments below:
Comment: The majority of commenters indicated support for the
proposed PRCDA expansion and support for providing PRC to the Tribe's
members living in Curry County, Oregon.
Response: The IHS appreciates the comments in support of the
expansion and agrees that the expansion would allow the Tribe to
authorize PRC services for its members residing in Curry County,
Oregon.
Comment: Two commenters believed that the IHS should not be relying
upon the Tribe's estimate of its members living in Curry County,
Oregon, and that the IHS should either produce its own estimate or
verify the Tribe's figure.
Response: In 2014, the IHS prepared a study of the Tolowa Dee-ni'
Tribe's roster of Tribal Citizens matched with patient user activity
data from the National Patient Information Reporting System. The
findings of the patient matching study were consistent with a previous
request conducted in 2013 by the former IHS California Area Director.
The Federal Register Notice states that the Smith River Tribe has
estimated that 177 of its Tribal members reside in Curry County, in the
State of Oregon, and they are not able to access PRC funds either at
the California Area or the Portland Area. The IHS believes that this
number is a fair approximation of the number of Smith River Tribal
members residing in Curry County, given IHS's facility data, and
recognizing that the Tribe has additional resources, such as a Tribal
Membership Roll, to estimate the number of members residing in Curry
County, Oregon, including those who have not yet sought services at IHS
facilities and therefore would not be included in IHS data.
Comment: One commenter inquired about the ``threshold'' for
expanding a PRCDA and whether there is a minimum number or percentage
in terms of Tribal members.
Response: Each PRCDA expansion under consideration must be reviewed
in accordance with the criteria set forth in 42 CFR 136.22(b), meaning
this decision is a case-by-case determination based upon the facts of
the particular expansion at issue. Regulations require the IHS to
consider, among other factors, the ``number of Indians residing in the
area'' of the proposed expansion, but the regulations do not require a
minimum number or percentage.
Comment: One commenter asked why the IHS is advancing the proposal
for the Tribe, after declining to accommodate requests from Oregon
Tribes and whether this created a double standard.
Response: Previously, the IHS restricted certain PRCDA expansions
based on the Agency's implementation of the regulatory ``geographic
proximity'' requirement specified at 42 CFR 136.22(b)(3). While
geographic proximity remains a necessary consideration in a PRCDA
expansion, the IHS has reconsidered our previous position and recently
adopted a more flexible approach. The IHS explained this change in an
April 7, 2016, Federal Register Notice (81 FR 20388), ``Notice of the
Redesignation of the Service Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe of
Gay Head (Aquinnah).''
Comment: One commenter asked how the IHS verified that the Tribal
members residing in Curry County, Oregon, are economically and socially
affiliated with the Tribe.
Response: Under 42 CFR 136.22(b)(2), the IHS is required to
consider whether ``the Tribal governing body has determined that
Indians residing in the area near the reservation are socially and
economically affiliated with the Tribes.'' The regulation does not
require an independent investigation by the IHS on this issue. The IHS
would typically defer to the Tribal governing body's determination,
given the language in the regulation and a Tribe's better position to
make this conclusion. However, the IHS would note that the Tribe's
estimate for the expanded population includes only its members residing
in Curry County, Oregon, and its members are eligible for PRC under 42
CFR 136.23, as long as the members reside within the PRCDA.
Comment: Two commenters inquired about the financial aspects of the
expansion, such as how this proposal would be paid for and what would
be the motivation, since no additional funds are being provided to the
Tribe.
Response: Tolowa Dee-ni' Tribal members living in Curry County,
Oregon, are unfunded for both IHS direct care and PRC resources. A few
Tribal members have sought direct services from Tribal health programs
in Oregon. While these individuals can receive direct services at the
Oregon programs, no funds are allocated to the Portland Area IHS or the
California Area IHS to provide services to members of the Tolowa Dee-
ni' Tribe residing in Curry County. The Agency is approving the
requested PRCDA expansion to allow the Tolowa Dee-ni' Tribe to
authorize the purchase of PRC services, within existing funds, for
members of the Tribe who reside in Curry County. Without this
expansion, such purchases would not be lawful and those Tribal members
would not be eligible to receive PRC services. Since there are no
additional funds being provided by the IHS for the PRCDA expansion, the
Tribe's current level of PRC funding will be available to serve a
larger population.
Comment: One commenter inquired about the potential future
financial impact on Oregon Tribes and how this could be accurately
measured, given the current data.
Response: Per Agency policy, expanding a PRCDA does not
automatically increase the funding to a Tribe. Tribes will continue to
use existing Federal allocation for PRC funds to provide services to
expanding population until Congress appropriates additional funding.
Each IHS Area will distribute future increases based on their own
methodologies. The Tribe may benefit from future increases to PRC
funding because of the additional active users from the PRCDA
expansion, but the IHS determined that there will be very little to no
financial impact as a result of the expansion on Portland Area Tribes.
Comment: One commenter inquired about the status of a proposed
pilot project for an Area-wide PRCDA in the Portland Area IHS.
Response: The Coquille Tribe presented a suggestion for
consideration
[[Page 47006]]
to the IHS Portland Area Funds Distribution Workgroup (FDWG). The FDWG
is a Tribal consultative body that serves as a resource to the Portland
Area Director on any Indian health system funds issue. The principal
function of the FDWG is to develop recommendations regarding resource
allocation within the Portland Area IHS. The IHS anticipates announcing
a plan of action on this issue soon.
Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribe/reservation County/state
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ak Chin Indian Community............... Pinal, AZ.
Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas...... Polk, TX.\1\
Alaska................................. Entire State.\2\
Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY,
Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY.
Aroostook Band of Micmacs.............. Aroostook, ME.\3\
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Daniels, MT, McCone, MT,
Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana. Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT,
Sheridan, MT, Valley, MT.
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Ashland, WI, Iron, WI.
Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad
River Reservation, Wisconsin.
Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan... Chippewa, MI.
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Glacier, MT, Pondera, MT.
Reservation of Montana.
Brigham City Intermountain School (\4\)
Health Center, Utah. Permanently
Closed on May 17, 1984.
Burns Paiute Tribe..................... Harney, OR.
California............................. Entire State, except for the
counties listed in the
footnote.\5\
Catawba Indian Nation.................. All Counties in SC,\6\
Cabarrus, NC, Cleveland, NC,
Gaston, NC, Mecklenburg, NC,
Rutherford, NC, Union, NC.
Cayuga Nation.......................... Alleghany, NY,\7\ Cattaraugus,
NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY,
Warren, PA.
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Haakon,
Cheyenne River Reservation, South SD, Meade, SD, Perkins, SD,
Dakota. Potter, SD, Stanley, SD,
Sully, SD, Walworth, SD,
Ziebach, SD.
Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Chouteau, MT, Hill, MT,
Boy's Reservation, Montana. Liberty, MT.
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana.......... St. Mary Parish, LA.
Cocopah Tribe of Arizona............... Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Coeur D'Alene Tribe.................... Benewah, ID, Kootenai, ID,
Latah, ID, Spokane, WA,
Whitman, WA.
Colorado River Indian Tribes of the La Paz, AZ, Riverside, CA, San
Colorado River Indian Reservation, Bernardino, CA, Yuma, AZ.
Arizona and California.
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Flathead, MT, Lake, MT,
of the Flathead Reservation. Missoula, MT, Sanders, MT.
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Klickitat, WA, Lewis, WA,
Yakama Nation. Skamania, WA,\8\ Yakima, WA.
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Benton, OR,\9\ Clackamas, OR,
of Oregon. Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR, Linn,
OR, Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR,
Polk, OR, Tillamook, OR,
Washington, OR, Yamhill, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Grays Harbor, WA, Lewis, WA,
Reservation. Thurston, WA.
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Chelan, WA,\10\ Douglas, WA,
Reservation. Ferry, WA, Grant, WA, Lincoln,
WA, Okanogan, WA, Stevens, WA.
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Coos, OR,\11\ Curry, OR,
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians. Douglas, OR, Lane, OR,
Lincoln, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Nevada, Juab, UT, Toole, UT.
Reservation, Nevada and Utah.
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR,
Community of Oregon. Polk, OR,\12\ Tillamook, OR,
Washington, OR, Yamhill, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Umatilla, OR, Union, OR.
Indian Reservation.
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Clackamas, OR, Jefferson, OR,
Reservation of Oregon. Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Wasco,
OR.
Coquille Indian Tribe.................. Coos, OR, Curry, OR, Douglas,
OR, Jackson, OR, Lane, OR.
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana........... Allen Parish, LA, Elton,
LA.\13\
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Coos, OR,\14\ Deshutes, OR,
Indians. Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR,
Josephine, OR, Klamath, OR,
Lane, OR.
Cowlitz Indian Tribe................... Clark, WA, Cowlitz, WA, King,
WA, Lewis, WA, Peirce, WA,
Skamania, WA, Thurston, WA,
Columbia, OR,\15\ Kittitas,
WA, Wahkiakum, WA.
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hand,
Creek Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Hughes, SD, Hyde, SD,
Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Crow Tribe of Montana.................. Big Horn, MT, Carbon, MT,
Treasure, MT,\16\ Yellowstone,
MT, Big Horn, WY, Sheridan,
WY.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians....... Cherokee, NC, Graham, NC,
Haywood, NC, Jackson, NC,
Swain, NC.
Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY,
River Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY.
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Moody, SD.
Dakota.
Forest County Potawatomi Community, Forest, WI, Marinette, WI,
Wisconsin. Oconto, WI.
Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Blaine, MT, Phillips, MT.
Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana.
Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Nevada, Malheur, OR.
Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian
Reservation, Nevada and Oregon.
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona.. Maricopa, AZ.
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, Nevada, Mohave, AZ, San
California and Nevada. Bernardino, CA.
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila Maricopa, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
River Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Antrim, MI,\17\ Benzie, MI,
Chippewa Indians, Michigan. Charlevoix, MI, Grand
Traverse, MI, Leelanau, MI,
Manistee, MI.
Hannahville Indian Community, Michigan. Delta, MI, Menominee, MI.
Haskell Indian Health Center........... Douglas, KS.\18\
[[Page 47007]]
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai....... Coconino, AZ.
Reservation, Arizona...................
Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin........... Adams, WI,\19\ Clark, WI,
Columbia, WI, Crawford, WI,
Dane, WI, Eau Claire, WI,
Houston, MN, Jackson, WI,
Juneau, WI, La Crosse, WI,
Marathon, WI, Monroe, WI,
Sauk, WI, Shawano, WI, Vernon,
WI, Wood, WI.
Hoh Indian Tribe....................... Jefferson, WA.
Hopi Tribe of Arizona.................. Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ,
Navajo, AZ.
Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians....... Aroostook, ME.\20\
Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ,
Indian Reservation, Arizona. Yavapai, AZ.
Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska...... Brown, KS, Doniphan, KS,
Richardson, NE.
Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe.............. Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Jena Band of Choctaw Indians........... Grand Parish, LA,\21\ LaSalle
Parish, LA, Rapides, LA.
Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico.... Archuleta, CO, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM.
Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Kane,
Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona. UT.
Kalispel Indian Community of the Pend Oreille, WA, Spokane, WA.
Kalispel Reservation.
Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico................ Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan Baraga, MI, Houghton, MI,
Ontonagon, MI.
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas.... Maverick, TX.\22\
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Brown, KS, Jackson, KS.
Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas.
Klamath Tribes......................... Klamath, OR.\23\
Koi Nation of Northern California Lake, CA, Sonoma, CA.\24\
(formerly known as Lower Lake
Rancheria, California).
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho................ Boundary, ID.
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Superior Sawyer, WI.
Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Iron, WI, Oneida, WI, Vilas,
Chippewa Indians of the Lac du WI.
Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin.
Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Gogebic, MI.
Chippewa Indians of Michigan.
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Kent, MI,\25\ Muskegon, MI,
Michigan. Newaygo, MI, Oceana, MI,
Ottawa, MI, Manistee, MI,
Mason, MI, Wexford, MI, Lake,
MI.
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Alcona, MI,\26\ Alger, MI,
Indians, Michigan. Alpena, MI, Antrim, MI,
Benzie, MI, Charlevoix, MI,
Cheboygan, MI, Chippewa, MI,
Crawford, MI, Delta, MI,
Emmet, MI, Grand Traverse, MI,
Iosco, MI, Kalkaska, MI,
Leelanau, MI, Luce, MI,
Mackinac, MI, Manistee, MI,
Missaukee, MI, Montmorency,
MI, Ogemaw, MI, Oscoda, MI,
Otsego, MI, Presque Isle, MI,
Schoolcraft, MI, Roscommon,
MI, Wexford, MI.
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hughes,
Brule Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Lower Elwha Tribal Community........... Clallam, WA.
Lower Sioux Indian Community in the Redwood, MN, Renville, MN.
State of Minnesota.
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation... Whatcom, WA.
Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Clallam, WA.
Reservation.
Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe....... New London, CT.\27\
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe................ Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA,
Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA,
Suffolk, MA.\28\
Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Allegan, MI,\29\ Barry, MI,
Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI,
Ottawa, MI.
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.... Langlade, WI, Menominee, WI,
Oconto, WI, Shawano, WI.
Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Chaves, NM, Lincoln, NM, Otero,
Reservation, New Mexico. NM.
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians............ Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-
Dade, FL, Hendry, FL.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Itasca, MN, Koochiching, MN,
Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake). St. Louis, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Carlton, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Fond du Lac Band.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Cook, MN.
Grand Portage Band.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Beltrami, MN, Cass, MN,
Leech Lake Band. Hubbard, MN, Itasca, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Aitkin, MN, Kanebec, MN, Mille
Mille Lacs Band. Lacs, MN, Pine, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota, Becker, MN, Clearwater, MN,
White Earth Band. Mahnomen, MN, Norman, MN,
Polk, MN.
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.... Attala, MS, Jasper, MS,\30\
Jones, MS, Kemper, MS, Leake,
MS, Neshoba, MS, Newton, MS,
Noxubee, MS,\31\ Scott,
MS,\32\ Winston, MS.
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut Fairfield, CT, Hartford, CT,
Litchfield, CT, Middlesex, CT,
New Haven, CT, New London, CT,
Tolland, CT, Windham, CT.
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe............... King, WA, Pierce, WA.
Narragansett Indian Tribe.............. Washington, RI.\33\
Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico, & Apache, AZ, Bernalillo, NM,
Utah. Cibola, NM, Coconino, AZ,
Kane, UT, McKinley, NM,
Montezuma, CO, Navajo, AZ, Rio
Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, San
Juan, NM, San Juan, UT,
Socorro, NM, Valencia, NM.
Nevada................................. Entire State.\34\
Nez Perce Tribe........................ Clearwater, ID, Idaho, ID,
Latah, ID, Lewis, ID, Nez
Perce, ID.
Nisqually Indian Tribe................. Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Nooksack Indian Tribe.................. Whatcom, WA.
Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Big Horn, MT, Carter, MT,\35\
Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana. Rosebud, MT.
[[Page 47008]]
Northwestern Band of Shoshone Nation... Box Elder, UT.\36\
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Allegan, MI,\37\ Barry, MI,
Pottawatomi, Michigan. Branch, MI, Calhoun, MI,
Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI,
Ottawa, MI.
Oglala Sioux Tribe..................... Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE,
Custer, SD, Dawes, NE, Fall
River, SD, Jackson, SD,\38\
Mellette, SD, Pennington, SD,
Shannon, SD, Sheridan, NE,
Todd, SD.
Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico.............. Rio Arriba, NM.
Oklahoma............................... Entire State.\39\
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska................ Burt, NE, Cuming, NE, Monona,
IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE.
Oneida Nation.......................... Brown, WI, Outagamie, WI.
Oneida Nation of New York.............. Chenango, NY, Cortland, NY,
Herkimer, NY, Madison, NY,
Oneida, NY, Onondaga, NY.
Onondaga Nation........................ Onondaga, NY.
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah............ Iron, UT,\40\ Millard, UT,
Sevier, UT, Washington, UT.
Pamunkey Indian Tribe.................. Caroline, Hanover, Henrico,
King William, King and Queen,
New Kent, Richmond
(Independent City).\41\
Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona.......... Pima, AZ.\42\
Passamaquoddy Tribe.................... Aroostook, ME,43 44 Hancock,
ME,\45\ Washington, ME.
Penobscot Nation....................... Aroostook, ME \46\, Penobscot,
ME.
Poarch Band of Creeks.................. Baldwin, AL,\47\ Elmore, AL,
Escambia, AL, Mobile, AL,
Monroe, AL, Escambia, FL.
Pokagon Band of Pottawatomi Indians, Allegan, MI,\48\ Berrien, MI,
Michigan and Indiana. Cass, MI, Elkhart, IN,
Kosciusko, IN, La Porte, IN,
Marshall, IN, St. Joseph, IN,
Starke, IN, Van Buren, MI.
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska................ Boyd, NE,\49\ Burt, NE, Charles
Mix, SD, Douglas, NE, Hall,
NE, Holt, NE, Knox, NE,
Lancaster, NE, Madison, NE,
Platte, NE, Pottawatomie, IA,
Sarpy, NE, Stanton, NE, Wayne,
NE, Woodbury, IA.
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe............ Kitsap, WA.
Prairie Band of Pottawatomi Nation..... Jackson, KS.
Prairie Island Indian Community in the Goodhue, MN.
State of Minnesota.
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico............ Cibola, NM.
Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico.......... Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Torrance, NM,
Valencia, NM.
Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico............ Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM,
Sandoval, NM, Valencia, NM.
Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico............ Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico.......... Taos, NM.
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico......... Rio Arriba, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico....... Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico.... Los Alamos, NM, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico........ Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico...... Los Alamos, NM, Sandoval, NM,
Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico............. Colfax, NM, Taos, NM.
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico.......... Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico.............. Sandoval, NM.
Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup King, WA, Pierce, WA, Thurston,
Reservation. WA.
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Reservation, Arizona and California.
Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Reservation.
Quinault Indian Nation................. Grays Harbor, WA, Jefferson,
WA.
Rapid City, South Dakota............... Pennington, SD.\50\
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Bayfield, WI.
Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Beltrami, MN, Clearwater, MN,
Minnesota. Koochiching, MN, Lake of the
Woods, MN, Marshall, MN,
Pennington, MN, Polk, MN,
Roseau, MN.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE,
Indian Reservation, South Dakota. Gregory, SD, Lyman, SD,
Mellette, SD, Todd, SD, Tripp,
SD.
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas Brown, KS, Richardson, NE.
and Nebraska.
Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Tama, IA.
Iowa.
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Arenac, MI,\51\ Clare, MI,
Michigan. Isabella, MI, Midland, MI,
Missaukee, MI.
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe............... Franklin, NY, St. Lawrence, NY.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Maricopa, AZ.
Community of the Salt River
Reservation, Arizona.
Samish Indian Nation................... Clallam, WA,\52\ Island, WA,
Jefferson, WA, King, WA,
Kitsap, WA, Pierce, WA, San
Juan, WA, Skagit, WA,
Snohomish, WA, Whatcom, WA.
San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Apache, AZ, Cochise, AZ, Gila,
Carlos Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ,
Pinal, AZ.
San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Coconino, AZ, San Juan, UT.
Arizona.
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska.......... Bon Homme, SD, Knox, NE.
Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe............. Snohomish, WA, Skagit, WA.
[[Page 47009]]
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Alger, MI,\53\ Chippewa, MI,
Indians, Michigan. Delta, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac,
MI, Marquette, MI,
Schoolcraft, MI.
Seminole Tribe of Florida.............. Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-
Dade, FL, Glades, FL, Hendry,
FL.
Seneca Nation of Indians............... Alleghany, NY, Cattaraugus, NY,
Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY,
Warren, PA.
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Scott, MN.
Minnesota.
Shinnecock Indian Nation............... Nassau, NY,\54\ Suffolk, NY.
Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Pacific, WA.
Bay Indian Reservation.
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Bannock, ID, Bingham, ID,
Hall Reservation. Caribou, ID, Lemhi, ID,\55\
Power, ID.
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Nevada, Owyhee, ID.
Valley Reservation, Nevada.
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Codington, SD, Day, SD, Grant,
Traverse Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Marshall, SD, Richland,
ND, Roberts, SD, Sargent, ND,
Traverse, MN.
Skokomish Indian Tribe................. Mason, WA.
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Tooele, UT.
Utah.
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe................ King, WA,\56\ Snohomish, WA,
Pierce, WA, Island, WA, Mason,
WA.
Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Wisconsin. Forest, WI.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Archuleta, CO, La Plata, CO,
Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado. Montezuma, CO, Rio Arriba, NM,
San Juan, NM.
Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota........ Benson, ND, Eddy, ND, Nelson,
ND, Ramsey, ND.
Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Ferry, WA, Lincoln, WA,
Reservation. Stevens, WA.
Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Mason, WA.
Island Reservation.
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Barron, WI, Burnett, WI, Pine,
MN, Polk, WI, Washburn, WI.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & Adams, ND, Campbell, SD,
South Dakota. Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Emmons,
ND, Grant, ND, Morton, ND,
Perkins, SD, Sioux, ND,
Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD.
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Snohomish, WA.
Washington.
Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin Menominee, WI, Shawano, WI.
Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Kitsap, WA.
Madison Reservation.
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community...... Skagit, WA.
Tejon Indian Tribe..................... Kern, CA.\57\
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Dunn, ND, Mercer, ND, McKenzie,
Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. ND, McLean, ND, Mountrail, ND,
Ward, ND.
Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona....... Maricopa, AZ, Pima, AZ, Pinal,
AZ.
Tonawanda Band of Seneca............... Genesee, NY, Erie, NY, Niagara,
NY.
Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation (formerly known California, Curry, OR.\58\
as Smith River Rancheria of
California).
Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona.......... Gila, AZ.
Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Divide, ND,\59\ McKenzie, ND,
Montana. Williams, ND, Richland, MT,
Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan, MT.
Tulalip Tribes of Washington........... Snohomish, WA.
Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe............. Avoyelles, LA, Rapides, LA.\60\
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Rolette, ND.
Indians of North Dakota.
Tuscarora Nation....................... Niagara, NY.
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota....... Chippewa, MN, Yellow Medicine,
MN.
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.............. Skagit, WA.
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Carbon, UT, Daggett, UT,
Reservation, Utah. Duchesne, UT, Emery, UT,
Grand, UT, Rio Blanco, CO,
Summit, UT, Uintah, UT, Utah,
UT, Wasatch, UT.
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe................. Apache, AZ, La Plata, CO,
Montezuma, CO, San Juan, NM,
San Juan, UT.
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). Dukes, MA,\61\ Barnstable, MA,
Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA,
Plymouth, MA, Suffolk, MA.\62\
Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California.... Nevada, California except for
the counties listed in
footnote.
White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Gila,
Apache Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ,
Navajo, AZ.
Wilton Rancheria, California........... Sacramento, CA.\63\
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska............ Dakota, NE, Dixon, NE, Monona,
IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE,
Woodbury, IA.
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.... Bon Homme, SD, Boyd, NE,
Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, SD,
Gregory, SD, Hutchinson, SD,
Knox, NE.
Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Yavapai, AZ.
Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe.......... Yavapai, AZ.
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas......... El Paso, TX.\64\
Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Apache, AZ, Cibola, NM,
Mexico. McKinley, NM, Valencia, NM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 100-89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama
and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ``members
of the Tribe'' by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and
sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
\2\ Entire State of Alaska is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR
136.22(a)(1)).
\3\ Aroostook Band of Micmacs was recognized by Congress on November 26,
1991, through the Aroostook Band of Micmac Settlement Act. Aroostook
County, ME, was defined as the SDA.
[[Page 47010]]
\4\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of
the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these
facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of
funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility
regulations. Historically services have been provided at Brigham City
Intermountain School Health Center, Utah (Pub. L. 88-358). The Brigham
Intermountain School Health Center was renamed to Intermountain Inter-
Tribal School in 1974 and was permanently closed on May 17, 1984.
\5\ Entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda,
Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco,
San Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San
Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura,
is designated a CHSDA (25 U.S.C. 1680).
\6\ The counties were recognized after the January 1984 CHSDA FRN was
published, in accordance with Public Law 103-116, Catawba Indian Tribe
of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, dated October
27, 1993.
\7\ There is no reservation for the Cayuga Nation; the service delivery
area consists of those counties identified by the Cayuga Nation.
\8\ Skamania County, WA, has historically been a part of the Yakama
Service Unit population since 1979.
\9\ In order to carry out the Congressional intent of the Siletz
Restoration Act, Public Law 95-195, as expressed in H. Report No. 95-
623, at page 4, members of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
of Oregon residing in these counties are eligible for contract health
services.
\10\ Chelan County, WA, has historically been a part of the Colville
Service Unit population since 1970.
\11\ Pursuant to Public Law 98-481 (H. Rept. No. 98-904), Coos, Lower
Umpqua and Siuslaw Restoration Act, members of the Tribe residing in
these counties were specified as eligible for Federal services and
benefits without regard to the existence of a Federal Indian
reservation.
\12\ The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon were
recognized by Public Law 98-165 which was signed into law on November
22, 1983, and provides for eligibility in these six counties without
regard to the existence of a reservation.
\13\ The CHSDA for the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana was expanded
administratively by the Director, IHS, through regulation (42 CFR
136.22(6)) to include city limits of Elton, LA.
\14\ Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians recognized by Public Law
97-391, signed into law on December 29, 1983. House Rept. No. 97-862
designates Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties as a service area
without regard to the existence of a reservation. The IHS later
administratively expanded the CHSDA to include the counties of Coos,
OR, Deschutes, OR, Klamath, OR, and Lane, OR.
\15\ The Cowlitz Indian Tribe was recognized in July 2002 as documented
at 67 FR 46329, July 12, 2002. The counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes
of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
The CHSDA was administratively expanded to included Columbia County,
OR, Kittitas, WA, and Wahkiakum County, WA, as published at 67884 FR
December 21, 2009.
\16\ Treasure County, MT, has historically been a part of the Crow
Service Unit population.
\17\ The counties listed have historically been a part of the Grand
Traverse Service Unit population since 1980.
\18\ Haskell Indian Health Center has historically been a part of Kansas
Service Unit since 1979. Special programs have been established by
Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for
services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of
the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the
eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at
Haskell Indian Health Center (H. Rept. No. 95-392).
\19\ CHSDA counties for the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin were designated
by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(5)). Dane County, WI, was added to the
reservation by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1986.
\20\ Public Law 97-428 provides that any member of the Houlton Band of
Maliseet Indians in or around the Town of Houlton shall be eligible
without regard to existence of a reservation.
\21\ The Jena Band of Choctaw Indian was Federally acknowledged as
documented at 60 FR 28480, May 31, 1995. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for
the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public
Law 93-638.
\22\ Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, formerly known as the Texas
Band of Kickapoo, was recognized by Public Law 97-429, signed into law
on January 8, 1983. The Act provides for eligibility for Kickapoo
Tribal members residing in Maverick County without regard to the
existence of a reservation.
\23\ The Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act (Pub. L. 99-398, Sec.
2(2)) states that for the purpose of Federal services and benefits
``members of the tribe residing in Klamath County shall be deemed to
be residing in or near a reservation''.
\24\ The Koi Nation of Northern California, formerly known as the Lower
Lake Rancheria, was reaffirmed by the Secretary of the Bureau of
Indian Affairs on December 29, 2000. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRCDA, for
the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public
Law 93-638.
\25\ The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River
Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant
to Public Law 103-324, Sec. 4(b) the counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes
of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\26\ The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River
Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant
to Public Law 103-324, Sec. 4(b) the counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes
of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\27\ Mashantucket Pequot Indian Claims Settlement Act, Public Law 98-
134, signed into law on October 18, 1983, provides a reservation for
the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe in New London County, CT.
\28\ The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in February 2007, as
documented at 72 FR 8007, February 22, 2007. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for
the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public
Law 93-638.
\29\ The Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of
Michigan was recognized in October 1998, as documented at 63 FR 56936,
October 23, 1998. The counties listed were designated administratively
as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a
CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\30\ Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in
Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health
services; these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR
136.22.
\31\Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in
Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health
services; these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR
136.22.
\32\ Scott County, MS, has historically been a part of the Choctaw
Service Unit population since 1970.
\33\ The Narragansett Indian Tribe was recognized by Public Law 95-395,
signed into law September 30, 1978. Lands in Washington County, RI,
are now Federally restricted and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
considers them as the Narragansett Indian Reservation.
\34\ Entire State of Nevada is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR
136.22(a)(2)).
\35\ Carter County, MT, has historically been a part of the Northern
Cheyenne Service Unit population since 1979.
\36\ Land of Box Elder County, Utah, was taken into trust for the
Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation in 1986.
\37\ The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan, formerly
known as the Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc., was recognized in
December 1995, as documented at 60 FR 66315, December 21, 1995. The
counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\38\ Washabaugh County, SD, merged and became part of Jackson County,
SD, in 1983; both were/are CHSDA counties for the Oglala Sioux Tribe.
\39\ Entire State of Oklahoma is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42
CFR 136.22(a)(3)).
\40\ Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act, Public Law 96-227,
provides for the extension of services for the Paiute Indian Tribe of
Utah to these four counties without regard to the existence of a
reservation.
\41\ In the Federal Register on July 08, 2015 (80 FR 39144), the
Pamunkey Indian Tribe was officially recognized as an Indian Tribe
within the meaning of Federal law. The counties listed were designated
administratively as the Tribe's PRCDA, as announced in the Federal
Register on July 28, 2017 (82 FR 35227).
\42\ Legislative history (H.R. Report No. 95-1021) to Public Law 95-375,
Extension of Federal Benefits to Pascua Yaqui Indians, Arizona,
expresses congressional intent that lands conveyed to the Pascua Yaqui
Tribe of Arizona pursuant to Act of October 8, 1964. (Pub. L. 88-350)
shall be deemed a Federal Indian Reservation.
[[Page 47011]]
\43\ The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-420; H.
Rept. 96-1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide
contract health services to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot
Nation.
\44\ The Passamaquoddy Tribe has two reservations: Indian Township and
Pleasant Point. The PRCDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe at Indian
Township, ME, is Aroostook County, ME, Washington County, ME, and
Hancock County, ME. The PRCDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe at Pleasant
Point, ME, is Washington County, ME, south of State Route 9, and
Aroostook County, ME.
\45\ The Passamaquoddy Tribe's counties listed are designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRCDA, for the purposes
of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\46\ The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-420; H.
Rept. 96-1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide PRC
to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation.
\47\ Counties in the Service Unit designated by Congress for the Poarch
Band of Creek Indians (see H. Rept. 98-886, June 29, 1984; Cong.
Record, October 10, 1984, Pg. H11929).
\48\ Public Law 103-323 restored Federal recognition to the Pokagon Band
of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana, in 1994 and identified
counties to serve as the SDA.
\49\ The Ponca Restoration Act, Public Law 101-484, recognized members
of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in Boyd, Douglas, Knox, Madison or
Lancaster counties of Nebraska or Charles Mix county of South Dakota
as residing on or near a reservation. Public Law 104-109 made
technical corrections to laws relating to Native Americans and added
Burt, Hall, Holt, Platte, Sarpy, Stanton, and Wayne counties of
Nebraska and Pottawatomie and Woodbury counties of Iowa to the Ponca
Tribe of Nebraska SDA.
\50\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of
the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these
facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of
funds for the particular facility, rather than the eligibility
regulations. Historically services have been provided at Rapid City
(S. Rept. No. 1154, FY 1967 Interior Approp. 89th Cong. 2d Sess.).
\51\ Historically part of Isabella Reservation Area for the Saginaw
Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Eastern Michigan Service
Unit population since 1979.
\52\The Samish Indian Tribe Nation was Federally acknowledged in April
1996 as documented at 61 FR 15825, April 9, 1996. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA,
for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Public Law 93-638.
\53\ CHSDA counties for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians,
Michigan, were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(4)).
\54\ The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June
2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA,
for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Public Law 93-638.
\55\ Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall
Service Unit population since 1979.
\56\ The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August
1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties
listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a
CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\57\ On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary-Indian
Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe.
The county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\58\ The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\59\ The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide
contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians
that reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in
Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota
and the adjoining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the
state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94-437).
\60\ Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica
Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982.
\61\ According to Public Law 100-95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag
Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha's Vineyard are deemed
to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of
eligibility for Federal services.
\62\ The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a PRCDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Public Law 93-638.
\63\ The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored
in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento
County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as
a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress originally
established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain
counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680).
\64\ Public Law 100-89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama
and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ``members
of the Tribe'' by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and
sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
Dated: October 2, 2017.
Michael D. Weahkee,
RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Acting
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-21758 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P