Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 46961-46963 [2017-21747]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
• Next Steps
• Other Business
• Adjourn
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Dated: October 3, 2017.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2017–21654 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Notice of Petitions by Firms for
Determination of Eligibility To Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance
Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice and opportunity for
public comment.
AGENCY:
The Economic Development
Administration (EDA) has received
SUMMARY:
46961
petitions for certification of eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
from the firms listed below.
Accordingly, EDA has initiated
investigations to determine whether
increased imports into the United States
of articles like or directly competitive
with those produced by each of these
firms contributed importantly to the
total or partial separation of the firm’s
workers, or threat thereof, and to a
decrease in sales or production of each
petitioning firm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANCE
[9/20/2017 through 9/30/2017]
Date accepted
for investigation
Firm name
Firm address
Solmet Technologies, Inc ...............
2716 Shepler Church Avenue
SW., Canton, OH 44706.
8 Mear Road, Holbrook, MA
02343.
9/20/2017
Micromatic Spring and Stamping
Co., Inc.
Development Associates, Inc .........
45 North Church Street, Addison,
IL 60101.
300 Old Baptist Road, North
Kingstown, RI 02852.
9/28/2017
Automatic Machine Products Co ....
400 Constitution Drive, Taunton,
MA 02780.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I.G. Marston Co., Inc ......................
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Division, Room
71030, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
These petitions are received pursuant to
section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as
amended.
Please follow the requirements set
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR
315.9 for procedures to request a public
hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official number
and title for the program under which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
9/28/2017
9/29/2017
9/29/2017
Product(s)
The firm manufactures large steel forgings, primarily for boring and sinking machinery.
The firm manufactures custom, non-metallic components such as washers, gaskets, seals, tags,
insulators, and discs made of plastic, rubber, neoprene, nylon, and many other non-metallic materials.
The firm manufactures springs, stampings, and
wire forms made of iron or steel wire.
The firm manufactures two-part polyurethane resins (clear polyurethane resin which is autograde, non-yellowing, UV-stable, and mercuryfree; clear polyurethane coating; clear urethane
resin; urethane adhesive; epoxy primer; and
wire and cable coating) for many applications.
The firm manufactures refrigeration and air-conditioning safety, pressure, and complete shut-off
valves and related assemblies, fittings, and components, all of steel and brass.
these petitions are submitted is 11.313,
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms.
Irette Patterson,
Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2017–21656 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes From Thailand: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 6, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
results of the 2015–2016 administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on circular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes (pipes and tubes) from
Thailand. This review covers two
manufacturers/exporters of the subject
merchandise, Saha Thai Steel Pipe
(Public) Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai) and
Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited
(Pacific Pipe). The period of review
(POR) is March 1, 2015, through
February 29, 2016. We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the preliminary results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
made certain changes to our preliminary
findings for Saha Thai. The final
weighted-average dumping margins for
the reviewed producers/exporters are
listed below in the section entitled
‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
DATES: October 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
46962
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 6, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
Preliminary Results.1 For a history of
events that have occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping order are certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand. The subject merchandise
has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches
or more, but not exceeding 16 inches.
For a full description of the scope of this
order, please see the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of issues raised, and to which we
responded, in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as an Appendix.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Final Determination of No Shipments
The Department preliminarily found
that Pacific Pipe had no shipments and,
therefore, no reviewable transactions
during the POR. The Department
received no further comments or
1 See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and
Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Finding of No Shipments; 2015–2016,
82 FR 16793 (April 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
2 See ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and
Tubes from Thailand: Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016,’’ dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a full
description of the scope of order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
under review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
in the Final Results of Review,
Based on a review of the record and
including those for which the
comments received from interested
Department may determine had no
parties regarding our Preliminary
shipments during the POR, the cash
Results, and for the reasons explained in deposit rate will continue to be the
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
company-specific rate published for the
we have made certain changes to Saha
most recently completed segment of this
Thai’s margin calculation.
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or another
Final Results of Review
completed segment of this proceeding,
As a result of our review, we
but the manufacturer is, then the cash
determine the following weighteddeposit rate will be the rate established
average dumping margin exists for the
for the most recently completed segment
period March 1, 2015, through February
of this proceeding for the manufacturer
29, 2016:
of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a
Weightedfirm covered in this or any previously
average
Producer/exporter
dumping
completed segment of this proceeding,
margin
then the cash deposit rate will be the
(percent)
‘‘all-others’’ rate of 15.67 percent
established in the less-than-fair-value
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd ..............
1.36 investigation.4 These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
Pacific Pipe Company Limited ....................................
* remain in effect until further notice.
information that refute this finding.
Thus, the Department continues to find
that Pacific Pipe had no reviewable
transactions during the POR.
* No shipments or sales subject to this review. The company has an individual rate from
a prior segment of the proceeding in which the
firm had shipments or sales.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise, in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of the final
results of review.
For Saha Thai, we will base the
assessment rate for the corresponding
entries on the margin listed above.
Additionally, because the Department
determined that Pacific Pipe had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries
that entered under Pacific Pipe’s name
will be liquidated at the all-others rate
effective during the POR.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the company
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notifications to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
The Department is issuing and
publishing these final results of
administrative review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
4 See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR
8341 (March 11, 1986).
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
Dated: October 3, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Determination of No Shipments for Pacific
Pipe
Discussion of the Issues
1. Whether to Disregard Saha Thai’s
Reported Pipe Specification/Grade
Designations
2. Whether to Adjust Saha Thai’s Reported
Coil Costs
3. Whether to Grant a Duty Drawback
Adjustment to Saha Thai
4. Whether to Revise the Date Range for
Saha Thai’s Home Market and U.S. Sales
[FR Doc. 2017–21747 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–870]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain oil
country tubular goods (OCTG) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of
review (POR) is September 1, 2015
through August 31, 2016. This review
covers 31 producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise. The Department
preliminarily determines that NEXTEEL
Co., Ltd. (NEXTEEL) and SeAH Steel
Corporation (SeAH), the two companies
selected for individual examination,
sold subject merchandise in the United
States at prices below normal value
during the POR. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable October 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria Cho or Deborah Scott, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
(202) 482–5075 or (202) 482–2657,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this
administrative review on November 9,
2016.1 We selected two mandatory
respondents in this review, NEXTEEL
and SeAH. For a detailed description of
the events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, dated
concurrently with these preliminary
results and hereby adopted by this
notice.2
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached to this notice as Appendix 1.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel
products of circular cross-section,
including oil well casing and tubing, of
iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both
carbon and alloy), whether seamless or
welded, regardless of end finish (e.g.,
whether or not plain end, threaded, or
threaded and coupled) whether or not
conforming to American Petroleum
Institute (API) or non-API
specifications, whether finished
(including limited service OCTG
products) or unfinished (including
green tubes and limited service OCTG
products), whether or not thread
protectors are attached. The scope of the
order also covers OCTG coupling stock.
For the full text of the scope of the
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
78778 (November 9, 2016).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Oil Country
Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea; 2015–
2016,’’ dated October 2, 2017 (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46963
order, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export
price and constructed export price are
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Among the companies under review,
Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. (Hyundai RB),
Samsung, Samsung C&T Corporation
(Samsung C&T), and SeAH Besteel
Corporation (SeAH Besteel) properly
filed certifications reporting that they
had no exports, sales, or entries of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.3 Based on the
certifications submitted by these
companies and our analysis of
information from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP), we
preliminarily determine that Hyundai
RB, Samsung, Samsung C&T, and SeAH
Besteel had no shipments during the
POR. For a full explanation of the
Department’s analysis, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
The Department finds that it is not
appropriate to preliminarily rescind the
review with respect to these companies
but, rather, intends to complete the
review with respect to these companies
and issue appropriate instructions to
CBP based on the final results of this
review.
Rates for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and the Department’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
companies not selected for examination
when the Department limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Act. Generally, the Department looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in a market economy
3 See Letter from Hyundai RB, ‘‘Oil Country
Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: No
Shipment Letter,’’ dated December 9, 2016; Letter
from Samsung and Samsung C&T, ‘‘Oil Country
Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: No
Shipment Letter,’’ dated December 9, 2016; and
Letter from SeAH Besteel, ‘‘Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Order on Oil Country Tubular
Goods from Korea for the 2015–16 Review Period—
No Shipments Letter,’’ dated December 7, 2016.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46961-46963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21747]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the 2015-2016 administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on circular welded carbon
steel pipes and tubes (pipes and tubes) from Thailand. This review
covers two manufacturers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Saha
Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai) and Pacific Pipe
Public Company Limited (Pacific Pipe). The period of review (POR) is
March 1, 2015, through February 29, 2016. We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to our
preliminary findings for Saha Thai. The final weighted-average dumping
margins for the reviewed producers/exporters are listed below in the
section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
DATES: October 10, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
[[Page 46962]]
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 6, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register
the Preliminary Results.\1\ For a history of events that have occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Finding of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR
16793 (April 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ See ``Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Thailand: Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the antidumping order are certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The subject
merchandise has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not
exceeding 16 inches. For a full description of the scope of this order,
please see the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a full description of
the scope of order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of issues raised, and to
which we responded, in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached
to this notice as an Appendix.
Final Determination of No Shipments
The Department preliminarily found that Pacific Pipe had no
shipments and, therefore, no reviewable transactions during the POR.
The Department received no further comments or information that refute
this finding. Thus, the Department continues to find that Pacific Pipe
had no reviewable transactions during the POR.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the
reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we have made
certain changes to Saha Thai's margin calculation.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margin exists for the period March 1, 2015, through
February 29, 2016:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.............. 1.36
Pacific Pipe Company Limited............................ *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No shipments or sales subject to this review. The company has an
individual rate from a prior segment of the proceeding in which the
firm had shipments or sales.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department determined,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, in accordance
with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of review.
For Saha Thai, we will base the assessment rate for the
corresponding entries on the margin listed above. Additionally, because
the Department determined that Pacific Pipe had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR, any suspended entries that entered under
Pacific Pipe's name will be liquidated at the all-others rate effective
during the POR.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above in the Final
Results of Review, including those for which the Department may
determine had no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review or another completed segment of this
proceeding, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any
previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit
rate will be the ``all-others'' rate of 15.67 percent established in
the less-than-fair-value investigation.\4\ These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notifications to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
The Department is issuing and publishing these final results of
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
[[Page 46963]]
Dated: October 3, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Determination of No Shipments for Pacific Pipe
Discussion of the Issues
1. Whether to Disregard Saha Thai's Reported Pipe Specification/
Grade Designations
2. Whether to Adjust Saha Thai's Reported Coil Costs
3. Whether to Grant a Duty Drawback Adjustment to Saha Thai
4. Whether to Revise the Date Range for Saha Thai's Home Market
and U.S. Sales
[FR Doc. 2017-21747 Filed 10-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
