Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 46809-46810 [2017-21515]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices coverage of a short-term letter of credit. The information allows the Ex-Im Bank staff to make a determination of the eligibility of the applicant and transaction for Ex-Im Bank assistance under its programs. Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and services. Annual Number of Respondents: 11. Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hr. Annual Burden Hours: 11. Frequency of Reporting of Use: On occasion. Government Reviewing Time per Year: 11 hours. Average Wages per Hour: $42.50. Average Cost per Year: $468 (time * wages). Benefits and Overhead: 20%. Total Government Cost: $561. Bassam Doughman, IT Specialist. [FR Doc. 2017–21578 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6690–01–P FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD Notice of Issuance of Federal Financial Accounting Technical Release 18, Implementation Guidance for Establishing Opening Balances Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. ACTION: Notice. asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Federal Financial Accounting Technical Release (TR) 18, Implementation Guidance for Establishing Opening Balances. The Technical Release is available on the FASAB Web site at https:// www.fasab.gov/accounting-standards/. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512–7350. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW., Mailstop 6H19, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512–7350. Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92–463. Dated: October 2, 2017. Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director. [FR Doc. 2017–21593 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1610–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [OMB 3060–XXXX] Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number. DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before December 5, 2017. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46809 the FCC invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. OMB Control Number: 3060–XXXX. Title: Mobility Fund Phase II Challenge Process. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: New information collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, not-for-profit institutions, and state, local or tribal governments. Estimated Number of Respondents and Responses: 500 respondents and 500 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 204 hours for challengers; 71 hours for challenged parties. Frequency of Response: One-time reporting requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for the currently approved information collection is contained in sections 154, 254, and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 4, 254, 303(r). Estimated Total Annual Burden: 78,725 hours. Total Annual Costs: None. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: To the extent the information submitted pursuant to this information collection is determined to be confidential, it will be protected by the Commission. If a respondent seeks to have information collected pursuant to this information collection withheld from public inspection, the respondent may request confidential treatment pursuant to section 0.459 of the Commission’s rules for such information. See 47 CFR 0.459. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Needs and Uses: A request for approval of this new information collection will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) after this 60-day comment period in order to obtain the full three-year E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1 asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES 46810 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices clearance from OMB. In its November 2011 USF/ICC Transformation Order (FCC 11–161), the Commission established the Mobility Fund, which consists of two phases. Mobility Fund Phase I (MF–I) provided one-time universal service support payments to immediately accelerate deployment of mobile broadband services. MF–II will use a reverse auction to provide ongoing universal service support payments to continue to advance deployment of such services. The Commission adopted the rules and framework for MF–I in the USF/ICC Transformation Order, and sought comment in an accompanying further notice of proposed rulemaking on the proposed framework for MF–II. In its February 2017 Mobility Fund II Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (MF–II Report and Order and/or FNPRM) (FCC 17–11), the FCC adopted the rules and framework for moving forward expeditiously with the MF–II auction. Among other things, the Commission stated in the MF–II Report and Order that, prior to the auction, it would establish a map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support based on the most recently available FCC Form 477 mobile wireless coverage data, and provide a limited timeframe for parties to challenge those initial determinations during the pre-auction process. The Commission sought comment in the accompanying Mobility Fund II FNPRM on how to best design a robust, targeted MF–II challenge process that efficiently resolves disputes about the areas eligible for MF–II support. In August 2017, the Commission released an Order on Reconsideration and Second Report and Order (Challenge Process Order) (FCC 17–102) in which it (1) reconsidered its earlier decision to use FCC Form 477 data to compile the map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support and decided it would instead conduct a new, onetime data collection with specified data parameters tailored to MF–II to determine the areas in which there is deployment of qualified LTE that will be used (together with high-cost disbursement data available from the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC)) for this purpose, and (2) adopted a streamlined challenge process that will efficiently resolve disputes about areas deemed presumptively ineligible for MF–II support. The map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support will serve as the starting point for the challenge process pursuant to which an interested party (challenger) may initiate a challenge with respect to VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 one or more areas initially deemed ineligible for MF–II support (i.e., areas not listed on the Commission’s map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support and challenged parties can respond to challenges. A challenger seeking to initiate a challenge of one or more areas initially deemed ineligible in the Commission’s map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support may do so via the online challenge portal developed by USAC for this purpose (the USAC portal). For each state, a challenger must (1) identify the area(s) it seeks to challenge, (2) submit detailed proof of a lack of unsubsidized, qualified 4G LTE coverage in each challenged area in the form of actual outdoor speed test data collected using the standardized parameters specified by the Commission in the Challenge Process Order and any other parameters the Commission or the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Wireline Competition Bureau (the Bureaus) may implement, and (3) certify its challenge. After the challenge window closes, the USAC system will use an automated challenge validation process developed by USAC to validate a challenger’s evidence and will determine which challenged areas pass validation and which fail. Once all valid challenges have been identified, a challenged party that chooses to respond to any valid challenge(s) will have a response window within which to submit additional data via the online USAC portal. A challenged party may submit technical information that is probative regarding the validity of a challenger’s speed tests (i.e., information demonstrating that the challenger’s speed tests are invalid or do not accurately reflect network performance), including speed test data and other device-specific data collected from transmitter monitoring software or, alternatively, may submit its own speed test data that conforms to the same standards and requirements specified by the Commission and the Bureaus for challengers. In conjunction with the qualified 4G LTE data separately collected pursuant to OMB 3060–1242 that will be used to create the map of areas presumptively eligible for MF–II support, the information collected under this new MF–II challenge process collection will enable the Commission to efficiently resolve disputes concerning the eligibility or ineligibility of an area initially deemed ineligible for MF–II support and establish the final map of areas eligible for such support, thereby furthering the Commission’s goal of targeting MF–II support to areas that PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 lack adequate mobile voice and broadband coverage absent subsidies through a transparent process. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–21515 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Notice of Termination: 10367—Summit Bank, Burlington, Washington The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as Receiver for 10367—Summit Bank, Burlington, Washington (Receiver) has been authorized to take all actions necessary to terminate the Receivership Estate of Summit Bank (Receivership Estate); the Receiver has made all dividend distributions required by law. The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDICCorporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary; including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments and deeds. Effective October 1, 2017, the Receivership Estate has been terminated, the Receiver discharged, and the Receivership Estate has ceased to exist as a legal entity. Dated: October 2, 2017. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–21505 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714–01–P FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meeting Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and its Continuation on Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC. STATUS: This Meeting Will be Closed to the Public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109. Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices. TIME AND DATES: E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46809-46810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[OMB 3060-XXXX]


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, 
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the Federal 
Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following information collections. Comments are requested 
concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, 
including whether the information shall have practical utility; the 
accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the 
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees.
    The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for 
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA 
that does not display a valid OMB control number.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before December 5, 
2017. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contacts below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email 
PRA@fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of its continuing effort to reduce 
paperwork burdens, and as required by the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520), the FCC invites the general public and other Federal agencies to 
take this opportunity to comment on the following information 
collections. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden 
estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on the respondents, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and 
ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small 
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
    OMB Control Number: 3060-XXXX.
    Title: Mobility Fund Phase II Challenge Process.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: New information collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, not-for-profit 
institutions, and state, local or tribal governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents and Responses: 500 respondents and 
500 responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 204 hours for challengers; 71 hours 
for challenged parties.
    Frequency of Response: One-time reporting requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. 
Statutory authority for the currently approved information collection 
is contained in sections 154, 254, and 303(r) of the Communications 
Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 4, 254, 303(r).
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 78,725 hours.
    Total Annual Costs: None.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: To the extent the information 
submitted pursuant to this information collection is determined to be 
confidential, it will be protected by the Commission. If a respondent 
seeks to have information collected pursuant to this information 
collection withheld from public inspection, the respondent may request 
confidential treatment pursuant to section 0.459 of the Commission's 
rules for such information. See 47 CFR 0.459.
    Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Needs and Uses: A request for approval of this new information 
collection will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) after this 60-day comment period in order to obtain the full 
three-year

[[Page 46810]]

clearance from OMB. In its November 2011 USF/ICC Transformation Order 
(FCC 11-161), the Commission established the Mobility Fund, which 
consists of two phases. Mobility Fund Phase I (MF-I) provided one-time 
universal service support payments to immediately accelerate deployment 
of mobile broadband services. MF-II will use a reverse auction to 
provide ongoing universal service support payments to continue to 
advance deployment of such services. The Commission adopted the rules 
and framework for MF-I in the USF/ICC Transformation Order, and sought 
comment in an accompanying further notice of proposed rulemaking on the 
proposed framework for MF-II. In its February 2017 Mobility Fund II 
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (MF-II 
Report and Order and/or FNPRM) (FCC 17-11), the FCC adopted the rules 
and framework for moving forward expeditiously with the MF-II auction. 
Among other things, the Commission stated in the MF-II Report and Order 
that, prior to the auction, it would establish a map of areas 
presumptively eligible for MF-II support based on the most recently 
available FCC Form 477 mobile wireless coverage data, and provide a 
limited timeframe for parties to challenge those initial determinations 
during the pre-auction process. The Commission sought comment in the 
accompanying Mobility Fund II FNPRM on how to best design a robust, 
targeted MF-II challenge process that efficiently resolves disputes 
about the areas eligible for MF-II support.
    In August 2017, the Commission released an Order on Reconsideration 
and Second Report and Order (Challenge Process Order) (FCC 17-102) in 
which it (1) reconsidered its earlier decision to use FCC Form 477 data 
to compile the map of areas presumptively eligible for MF-II support 
and decided it would instead conduct a new, one-time data collection 
with specified data parameters tailored to MF-II to determine the areas 
in which there is deployment of qualified LTE that will be used 
(together with high-cost disbursement data available from the Universal 
Service Administrative Company (USAC)) for this purpose, and (2) 
adopted a streamlined challenge process that will efficiently resolve 
disputes about areas deemed presumptively ineligible for MF-II support. 
The map of areas presumptively eligible for MF-II support will serve as 
the starting point for the challenge process pursuant to which an 
interested party (challenger) may initiate a challenge with respect to 
one or more areas initially deemed ineligible for MF-II support (i.e., 
areas not listed on the Commission's map of areas presumptively 
eligible for MF-II support and challenged parties can respond to 
challenges.
    A challenger seeking to initiate a challenge of one or more areas 
initially deemed ineligible in the Commission's map of areas 
presumptively eligible for MF-II support may do so via the online 
challenge portal developed by USAC for this purpose (the USAC portal). 
For each state, a challenger must (1) identify the area(s) it seeks to 
challenge, (2) submit detailed proof of a lack of unsubsidized, 
qualified 4G LTE coverage in each challenged area in the form of actual 
outdoor speed test data collected using the standardized parameters 
specified by the Commission in the Challenge Process Order and any 
other parameters the Commission or the Wireless Telecommunications 
Bureau and Wireline Competition Bureau (the Bureaus) may implement, and 
(3) certify its challenge.
    After the challenge window closes, the USAC system will use an 
automated challenge validation process developed by USAC to validate a 
challenger's evidence and will determine which challenged areas pass 
validation and which fail. Once all valid challenges have been 
identified, a challenged party that chooses to respond to any valid 
challenge(s) will have a response window within which to submit 
additional data via the online USAC portal. A challenged party may 
submit technical information that is probative regarding the validity 
of a challenger's speed tests (i.e., information demonstrating that the 
challenger's speed tests are invalid or do not accurately reflect 
network performance), including speed test data and other device-
specific data collected from transmitter monitoring software or, 
alternatively, may submit its own speed test data that conforms to the 
same standards and requirements specified by the Commission and the 
Bureaus for challengers.
    In conjunction with the qualified 4G LTE data separately collected 
pursuant to OMB 3060-1242 that will be used to create the map of areas 
presumptively eligible for MF-II support, the information collected 
under this new MF-II challenge process collection will enable the 
Commission to efficiently resolve disputes concerning the eligibility 
or ineligibility of an area initially deemed ineligible for MF-II 
support and establish the final map of areas eligible for such support, 
thereby furthering the Commission's goal of targeting MF-II support to 
areas that lack adequate mobile voice and broadband coverage absent 
subsidies through a transparent process.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21515 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.