Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment, 46241-46243 [2017-21290]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices
Based in Pleasanton, California, Natus
is a global healthcare company that
provides screening, diagnostic, and
monitoring solutions for its three
business units: Neurology, newborn
care, and hearing and balance care. Its
neurology business includes systems
that are highly complementary to the
divestiture assets and test for a variety
of medical conditions, including
epilepsy, head injury, tumors,
Parkinson’s, and sleep apnea. Natus is
well positioned to restore the
competition that otherwise would have
been lost pursuant to the proposed
Acquisition.
The parties must accomplish the
divestitures and relinquish their rights
to Natus no later than ten days after
consummating the proposed
Acquisition. If the Commission
determines that Natus is not an
acceptable acquirer, or that the manner
of the divestitures is not acceptable, the
proposed Order requires the parties to
unwind the sale of rights to Natus and
then divest the products to a
Commission-approved acquirer(s)
within six months of the date the Order
becomes final.
To ensure compliance with the Order,
the Commission has agreed to appoint a
Monitor to ensure that Integra and
Johnson & Johnson comply with all of
their obligations pursuant to the
Consent Agreement and to keep the
Commission informed about the status
of the transfer of the rights and assets to
Natus. The proposed Order further
allows the Commission to appoint a
trustee in the event the parties fail to
divest the products as required.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Order or
to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–21291 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[File No. 161 0084]
Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc.;
Analysis To Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair methods
of competition. The attached Analysis to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:18 Oct 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
Aid Public Comment describes both the
allegations in the complaint and the
terms of the consent orders—embodied
in the consent agreement—that would
settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write: ‘‘In the Matter of Abbott
Laboratories and Alere Inc., File No.
161–0084’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
abbottalereconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Abbott
Laboratories and Alere Inc., File No.
161–0084’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aylin M. Skroejer, (202–326–2459),
Bureau of Competition, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for September 28, 2017), on
the World Wide Web, at https://
www.ftc.gov/news-events/commissionactions.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before October 30, 2017. Write ‘‘In the
Matter of Abbott Laboratories and Alere
Inc., File No. 161–0084’’ on your
comment. Your comment—including
your name and your state—will be
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46241
placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/
public-comments.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
abbottalereconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Abbott
Laboratories and Alere Inc., File No.
161–0084’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Because your comment will be placed
on the publicly accessible FTC Web site
at https://www.ftc.gov, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information, such as your or anyone
else’s Social Security number; date of
birth; driver’s license number or other
state identification number, or foreign
country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your
comment does not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not
include any ‘‘trade secret or any
commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or
confidential’’—as provided by Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
46242
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public
record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted on the public FTC Web
site—as legally required by FTC Rule
4.9(b)—we cannot redact or remove
your comment from the FTC Web site,
unless you submit a confidentiality
request that meets the requirements for
such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c),
and the General Counsel grants that
request.
Visit the FTC Web site at https://
www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the
news release describing it. The FTC Act
and other laws that the Commission
administers permit the collection of
public comments to consider and use in
this proceeding, as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely
and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before October 30, 2017.
For information on the Commission’s
privacy policy, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, see
https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/
privacy-policy.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to
final approval, an Agreement
Containing Consent Orders (‘‘Consent
Agreement’’) from Abbott Laboratories
(‘‘Abbott’’) and Alere Inc. (‘‘Alere’’)
designed to remedy the anticompetitive
effects resulting from Abbott’s proposed
acquisition of Alere. The proposed
Decision and Order (‘‘Order’’) contained
in the Consent Agreement requires the
parties to divest all rights and assets
related to Alere’s point-of-care blood gas
testing business to Siemens
Aktiengelsellschaft (‘‘Siemens’’), and all
rights and assets related to Alere’s
point-of-care cardiac marker testing
business to Quidel Corporation
(‘‘Quidel’’).
The proposed Consent Agreement has
been placed on the public record for
thirty days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:18 Oct 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
the public record. After thirty days, the
Commission will review the comments
received and decide whether it should
withdraw, modify, or make the Consent
Agreement final.
Under the terms of the Amendment to
Agreement and Plan of Merger signed
on April 13, 2017, which amends the
Agreement and Plan of Merger signed
on January 30, 2016, Abbott will acquire
Alere in a transaction valued at
approximately $8.3 billion, which
includes Abbott’s assumption of $3.0
billion in debt (the ‘‘Acquisition’’). The
Commission’s Complaint alleges that
the proposed Acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7
of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 45, by substantially lessening
competition in the U.S. markets for
point-of-care blood gas testing systems
and point-of-care cardiac marker testing
systems. The proposed Consent
Agreement will remedy the alleged
violations by preserving the competition
that otherwise would be lost in these
markets as a result of the proposed
Acquisition.
portable point-of-care models that range
up to ten pounds in weight. Hospitals
pay a substantial premium for the
convenience of point-of-care blood gas
testing equipment over the closest
alternative, using larger benchtop
analyzers that employ multi-use packs
of reagents and are typically located in
a hospital laboratory or other
centralized location for analysis. The
vast majority of customers would not
switch to benchtop blood gas testing
systems in response to a small but
significant increase in the price of pointof-care blood gas testing systems.
Abbott and Alere are each other’s
closest competitors and the only
significant suppliers in the U.S. market
for point-of-care blood gas testing
systems, accounting for 82% and 15%
of 2016 sales, respectively. While
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and LifeHealth
LLC offer single-use, portable (but not
handheld) systems, they are more
distant competitors to Abbott and Alere
and maintain fringe positions in the
market.
The Parties
Point-of-care cardiac marker testing
systems are small, portable medical
instruments that measure specific
proteins released into the blood to
assess whether a patient experiencing
chest pains is having a myocardial
infarction or congestive heart failure.
They allow for quick initial diagnoses at
a patient’s bedside, which is critical
because the time between a cardiac
event and treatment increases the
likelihood the patient will suffer
permanent loss of heart muscle. The
convenience of point-of-care cardiac
marker testing systems differentiates
them from larger benchtop models that
can only be located in a hospital
laboratory or some other central area of
larger emergency departments. A small
but significant increase in the price of
point-of-care cardiac marker testing
systems would not cause customers to
switch to benchtop cardiac marker
testing systems.
Abbott and Alere are the only
significant suppliers of point-of-care
cardiac marker testing systems,
accounting for approximately 87% and
13%, respectively, of the 2016 U.S.
market. Abbott offers point-of-care
cardiac marker testing on a handheld
analyzer, and Alere on a two-pound
portable analyzer. The next closest
competitor to the parties is Response
Biomedical, which offers a more
complex technology and accounts for
only a nominal share of the market.
Abbott, headquartered in Abbott Park,
Illinois, is a global healthcare company
with three business units in the United
States: Diagnostic, nutritional, and
vascular. Its diagnostic testing division
provides an expansive portfolio of
instruments, tests, software, and
training to hospitals, laboratories, blood
banks, and physician offices.
Alere, headquartered in Waltham,
Massachusetts, is a global leader in
rapid diagnostic testing. Alere provides
diagnostic equipment, consumables,
and patient self-management tools for
cardiometabolic disease, infectious
disease, and toxicology.
The Relevant Products and Structure of
the Markets
I. Point-of-Care Blood Gas Testing
Systems
Point-of-care blood gas testing
systems are small, portable medical
instruments that measure a patient’s
blood pH, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and
electrolyte levels to assess lung and
kidney function, as well as whether an
acute patient requires oxygen or other
urgent treatment. They provide results
in less than five minutes at a patient’s
bedside or other acute care settings
where fast turnaround time is critical,
and rely on single-use, disposable test
cartridges. Abbott and Alere offer the
only handheld point-of-care blood gas
testing devices, and other firms offer
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Point-of-Care Cardiac Marker
Testing Systems
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices
The Relevant Geographic Market
The relevant geographic market for
point-of-care blood gas testing systems
and point-of-care cardiac marker testing
systems is the United States. These
products are medical devices regulated
by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (‘‘FDA’’). Medical
devices sold outside of the United
States, but not approved for sale in the
United States, do not provide viable
competitive alternatives for U.S.
consumers.
Competitive Effects of the Acquisition
The proposed Acquisition would
likely result in significant competitive
harm to consumers in the markets for
point-of-care blood gas testing systems
and point-of-care cardiac marker testing
systems. In each relevant market,
customers are able to leverage Abbott
and Alere against each other to obtain
better prices and improved products. By
eliminating this direct and substantial
head-to-head competition, the proposed
Acquisition likely would allow the
combined firm to exercise market power
unilaterally, resulting in higher prices,
reduced innovation, and less choice for
consumers.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Entry Conditions
Entry in the relevant markets would
not be timely, likely, or sufficient in
magnitude, character, and scope to deter
or counteract the anticompetitive effects
of the proposed Acquisition. New entry
would require significant investment of
time and money for product research
and development, regulatory approval
by the FDA, and establishment of a U.S.
sales and service infrastructure. Such
development efforts are difficult, timeconsuming, and expensive, and often
fail to result in a competitive product
reaching the market.
The Consent Agreement
The Consent Agreement eliminates
the competitive concerns raised by the
proposed Acquisition by requiring Alere
to divest: (1) Its point-of-care blood gas
testing business, including its Ottawa,
Canada facilities, to Siemens; and (2) its
point-of-care cardiac marker testing
business, including its San Diego,
California facility, to Quidel. Alere must
divest all assets and rights to research,
develop, manufacture, market, and sell
its point-of-care blood gas testing and
point-of-care cardiac marker testing
product lines, including all related
intellectual property and other
confidential business information.
Further, Siemens and Quidel intend to
hire substantially all of Alere’s
employees whose responsibilities
primarily relate to the research,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:18 Oct 03, 2017
Jkt 244001
development, manufacture, or sale of
the relevant products. The provisions of
the Consent Agreement ensure that
Siemens and Quidel become
independent, viable, and effective
competitors in the respective markets in
order to maintain the competition that
currently exists.
Siemens is a global conglomerate with
a healthcare division that is one of the
world’s largest suppliers of technology
to the healthcare industry and a leader
in medical imaging and laboratory
diagnostics. Siemens currently supplies
a benchtop blood gas testing system,
and Alere’s handheld system will be
highly complementary to Siemens’
portfolio in the United States. Siemens
has the expertise, U.S. sales
infrastructure, and resources to restore
the competition that otherwise would
have been lost pursuant to the proposed
Acquisition.
Based in San Diego, California, Quidel
develops, manufactures, and markets
point-of-care diagnostic testing
solutions globally. The company has
expertise with immunoassay testing and
currently focuses on infectious diseases,
women’s and general health, and
gastrointestinal diseases. The
acquisition of Alere’s point-of-care
cardiac marker testing business will
complement Quidel’s portfolio of rapid
diagnostic testing solutions. Moreover,
Quidel’s chairman was co-inventor of
Alere’s point-of-care cardiac marker
testing system, providing Quidel with
additional understanding and
background of the divestiture business.
The parties must accomplish the
divestitures no later than thirty days
after the consummation of the Proposed
Acquisition. If the Commission
determines that either Siemens or
Quidel is not an acceptable acquirer, or
that the manner of the divestitures is not
acceptable, the proposed Order requires
the parties to unwind the sale of rights
to Siemens and/or Quidel and then
divest the products to a Commissionapproved acquirer(s) within six months
of the date the Order becomes final.
The Commission has agreed to
appoint a Monitor to ensure that Abbott
and Alere comply with all of their
obligations pursuant to the Consent
Agreement and to keep the Commission
informed about the status of the transfer
of the rights and assets to Siemens and
Quidel. The proposed Order further
allows the Commission to appoint a
trustee in the event the parties fail to
divest the products as required.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not
intended to constitute an official
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46243
interpretation of the proposed Order or
to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–21290 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 162 3128]
Moonlight Slumber, LLC; Analysis To
Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
complaint and the terms of the consent
order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before October 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write: ‘‘In the Matter of
Moonlight Slumber, LLC, File No.
1623128’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
moonlightslumberconsent by following
the instructions on the web-based form.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Moonlight
Slumber, LLC, File No. 1623128’’ on
your comment and on the envelope, and
mail your comment to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–
5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20580,
or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Kostner (202–326–2880) and
Jock Chung (202–326–2984), Bureau of
Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46241-46243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 161 0084]
Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc.; Analysis To Aid Public
Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition.
The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the
allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent orders--
embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write: ``In the Matter of
Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc., File No. 161-0084'' on your
comment, and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/abbottalereconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment
on paper, write ``In the Matter of Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc.,
File No. 161-0084'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your
comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center,
400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aylin M. Skroejer, (202-326-2459),
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the
consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic
copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained
from the FTC Home Page (for September 28, 2017), on the World Wide Web,
at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/commission-actions.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before October 30,
2017. Write ``In the Matter of Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc., File
No. 161-0084'' on your comment. Your comment--including your name and
your state--will be placed on the public record of this proceeding,
including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web
site, at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/public-comments.
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/abbottalereconsent by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``In the Matter
of Abbott Laboratories and Alere Inc., File No. 161-0084'' on your
comment and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20580,
or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20024. If
possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or
overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible FTC
Web site at https://www.ftc.gov, you are solely responsible for making
sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or confidential
information. In particular, your comment should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone else's Social
Security number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You are also
solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include
any sensitive health information, such as medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, your comment
should not include any ``trade secret or any commercial or financial
information which . . . is privileged or confidential''--as provided by
Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2),
16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in particular competitively sensitive
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
[[Page 46242]]
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted on the public FTC Web site--as legally required by FTC Rule
4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment from the FTC Web site,
unless you submit a confidentiality request that meets the requirements
for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General Counsel
grants that request.
Visit the FTC Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate. The Commission
will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before October 30, 2017. For information on the
Commission's privacy policy, including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject
to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (``Consent
Agreement'') from Abbott Laboratories (``Abbott'') and Alere Inc.
(``Alere'') designed to remedy the anticompetitive effects resulting
from Abbott's proposed acquisition of Alere. The proposed Decision and
Order (``Order'') contained in the Consent Agreement requires the
parties to divest all rights and assets related to Alere's point-of-
care blood gas testing business to Siemens Aktiengelsellschaft
(``Siemens''), and all rights and assets related to Alere's point-of-
care cardiac marker testing business to Quidel Corporation
(``Quidel'').
The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record
for thirty days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments
received during this period will become part of the public record.
After thirty days, the Commission will review the comments received and
decide whether it should withdraw, modify, or make the Consent
Agreement final.
Under the terms of the Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger
signed on April 13, 2017, which amends the Agreement and Plan of Merger
signed on January 30, 2016, Abbott will acquire Alere in a transaction
valued at approximately $8.3 billion, which includes Abbott's
assumption of $3.0 billion in debt (the ``Acquisition''). The
Commission's Complaint alleges that the proposed Acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as
amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by substantially lessening competition in the
U.S. markets for point-of-care blood gas testing systems and point-of-
care cardiac marker testing systems. The proposed Consent Agreement
will remedy the alleged violations by preserving the competition that
otherwise would be lost in these markets as a result of the proposed
Acquisition.
The Parties
Abbott, headquartered in Abbott Park, Illinois, is a global
healthcare company with three business units in the United States:
Diagnostic, nutritional, and vascular. Its diagnostic testing division
provides an expansive portfolio of instruments, tests, software, and
training to hospitals, laboratories, blood banks, and physician
offices.
Alere, headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, is a global leader
in rapid diagnostic testing. Alere provides diagnostic equipment,
consumables, and patient self-management tools for cardiometabolic
disease, infectious disease, and toxicology.
The Relevant Products and Structure of the Markets
I. Point-of-Care Blood Gas Testing Systems
Point-of-care blood gas testing systems are small, portable medical
instruments that measure a patient's blood pH, oxygen, carbon dioxide,
and electrolyte levels to assess lung and kidney function, as well as
whether an acute patient requires oxygen or other urgent treatment.
They provide results in less than five minutes at a patient's bedside
or other acute care settings where fast turnaround time is critical,
and rely on single-use, disposable test cartridges. Abbott and Alere
offer the only handheld point-of-care blood gas testing devices, and
other firms offer portable point-of-care models that range up to ten
pounds in weight. Hospitals pay a substantial premium for the
convenience of point-of-care blood gas testing equipment over the
closest alternative, using larger benchtop analyzers that employ multi-
use packs of reagents and are typically located in a hospital
laboratory or other centralized location for analysis. The vast
majority of customers would not switch to benchtop blood gas testing
systems in response to a small but significant increase in the price of
point-of-care blood gas testing systems.
Abbott and Alere are each other's closest competitors and the only
significant suppliers in the U.S. market for point-of-care blood gas
testing systems, accounting for 82% and 15% of 2016 sales,
respectively. While IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and LifeHealth LLC offer
single-use, portable (but not handheld) systems, they are more distant
competitors to Abbott and Alere and maintain fringe positions in the
market.
II. Point-of-Care Cardiac Marker Testing Systems
Point-of-care cardiac marker testing systems are small, portable
medical instruments that measure specific proteins released into the
blood to assess whether a patient experiencing chest pains is having a
myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. They allow for quick
initial diagnoses at a patient's bedside, which is critical because the
time between a cardiac event and treatment increases the likelihood the
patient will suffer permanent loss of heart muscle. The convenience of
point-of-care cardiac marker testing systems differentiates them from
larger benchtop models that can only be located in a hospital
laboratory or some other central area of larger emergency departments.
A small but significant increase in the price of point-of-care cardiac
marker testing systems would not cause customers to switch to benchtop
cardiac marker testing systems.
Abbott and Alere are the only significant suppliers of point-of-
care cardiac marker testing systems, accounting for approximately 87%
and 13%, respectively, of the 2016 U.S. market. Abbott offers point-of-
care cardiac marker testing on a handheld analyzer, and Alere on a two-
pound portable analyzer. The next closest competitor to the parties is
Response Biomedical, which offers a more complex technology and
accounts for only a nominal share of the market.
[[Page 46243]]
The Relevant Geographic Market
The relevant geographic market for point-of-care blood gas testing
systems and point-of-care cardiac marker testing systems is the United
States. These products are medical devices regulated by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (``FDA''). Medical devices sold outside of the
United States, but not approved for sale in the United States, do not
provide viable competitive alternatives for U.S. consumers.
Competitive Effects of the Acquisition
The proposed Acquisition would likely result in significant
competitive harm to consumers in the markets for point-of-care blood
gas testing systems and point-of-care cardiac marker testing systems.
In each relevant market, customers are able to leverage Abbott and
Alere against each other to obtain better prices and improved products.
By eliminating this direct and substantial head-to-head competition,
the proposed Acquisition likely would allow the combined firm to
exercise market power unilaterally, resulting in higher prices, reduced
innovation, and less choice for consumers.
Entry Conditions
Entry in the relevant markets would not be timely, likely, or
sufficient in magnitude, character, and scope to deter or counteract
the anticompetitive effects of the proposed Acquisition. New entry
would require significant investment of time and money for product
research and development, regulatory approval by the FDA, and
establishment of a U.S. sales and service infrastructure. Such
development efforts are difficult, time-consuming, and expensive, and
often fail to result in a competitive product reaching the market.
The Consent Agreement
The Consent Agreement eliminates the competitive concerns raised by
the proposed Acquisition by requiring Alere to divest: (1) Its point-
of-care blood gas testing business, including its Ottawa, Canada
facilities, to Siemens; and (2) its point-of-care cardiac marker
testing business, including its San Diego, California facility, to
Quidel. Alere must divest all assets and rights to research, develop,
manufacture, market, and sell its point-of-care blood gas testing and
point-of-care cardiac marker testing product lines, including all
related intellectual property and other confidential business
information. Further, Siemens and Quidel intend to hire substantially
all of Alere's employees whose responsibilities primarily relate to the
research, development, manufacture, or sale of the relevant products.
The provisions of the Consent Agreement ensure that Siemens and Quidel
become independent, viable, and effective competitors in the respective
markets in order to maintain the competition that currently exists.
Siemens is a global conglomerate with a healthcare division that is
one of the world's largest suppliers of technology to the healthcare
industry and a leader in medical imaging and laboratory diagnostics.
Siemens currently supplies a benchtop blood gas testing system, and
Alere's handheld system will be highly complementary to Siemens'
portfolio in the United States. Siemens has the expertise, U.S. sales
infrastructure, and resources to restore the competition that otherwise
would have been lost pursuant to the proposed Acquisition.
Based in San Diego, California, Quidel develops, manufactures, and
markets point-of-care diagnostic testing solutions globally. The
company has expertise with immunoassay testing and currently focuses on
infectious diseases, women's and general health, and gastrointestinal
diseases. The acquisition of Alere's point-of-care cardiac marker
testing business will complement Quidel's portfolio of rapid diagnostic
testing solutions. Moreover, Quidel's chairman was co-inventor of
Alere's point-of-care cardiac marker testing system, providing Quidel
with additional understanding and background of the divestiture
business.
The parties must accomplish the divestitures no later than thirty
days after the consummation of the Proposed Acquisition. If the
Commission determines that either Siemens or Quidel is not an
acceptable acquirer, or that the manner of the divestitures is not
acceptable, the proposed Order requires the parties to unwind the sale
of rights to Siemens and/or Quidel and then divest the products to a
Commission-approved acquirer(s) within six months of the date the Order
becomes final.
The Commission has agreed to appoint a Monitor to ensure that
Abbott and Alere comply with all of their obligations pursuant to the
Consent Agreement and to keep the Commission informed about the status
of the transfer of the rights and assets to Siemens and Quidel. The
proposed Order further allows the Commission to appoint a trustee in
the event the parties fail to divest the products as required.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Order or to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21290 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P