Overweight Parcels, 46010 [2017-21150]
Download as PDF
46010
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2017 / Proposed Rules
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Jacksonville in the
enforcement of the security zone. This
includes Coast Guard Patrol
Commanders, Coast Guard coxswains,
petty officers, and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels and
federal, state, and local law officers
designated by or assisting the COTP
Jacksonville in the enforcement of
regulated navigation areas and security
zones.
(c) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations governing
security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33
apply to the security zones described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the security zone unless
authorized by the COTP Jacksonville or
a designated representative.
(3) Persons desiring to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
security zone may request permission
from the COTP Jacksonville by
telephone at 904–714–7557, or a
designated representative via VHF–FM
radio on channel 16. If authorization is
granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or the designated
representative.
Dated: September 28, 2017.
T.C. Wiemers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2017–21230 Filed 10–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Overweight Parcels
Postal ServiceTM.
Request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service is
contemplating amendment of the
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM®), to address the challenges
presented by overweight parcels that
make their way into the postal network.
To aid us in this effort, we are
requesting comments from the postal
community regarding a variety of
suggested actions to resolve or
ameliorate this problem. Overweight
parcels for the purpose of this notice are
defined as anything in excess of 70
pounds or the maximum weight allowed
for HAZMAT.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Oct 02, 2017
Jkt 244001
Submit comments on or before
November 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
comments to the manager, Product
Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Room 4446,
Washington, DC 20260–5015. If sending
comments by email, include the name
and address of the commenter and send
to ProductClassification@usps.gov, with
a subject line of ‘‘Overweight Parcels.’’
Faxed comments are not accepted.
You may inspect and photocopy all
written comments, by appointment
only, at USPS® Headquarters Library,
475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 11th Floor
North, Washington, DC 20260. These
records are available for review on
Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.–4 p.m.,
by calling 202–268–2906.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions or comments to Lizbeth
J. Dobbins by email at lizbeth.j.dobbins@
usps.gov or phone (202) 268–3789.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
The Challenge of Overweight Parcels
Overweight parcels should never be
accepted for delivery into the postal
network. On occasion an item, such as
a returns parcel, gets into the Postal
network and arrives at a destination
plant or post office. It is unsafe to return
the item back through the postal
network so the receiving office contacts
the customer and asks the customer to
pick up the package. Sometimes the
package is abandoned which creates
another safety issue trying to dispose of
the overweight item.
Part of the challenge is that we do not
want overweight items at any time since
these items cause numerous safety
issues and we strongly discourage
mailers from entering them into the
postal system. We do not accept them at
postal retail counters either and yet,
these items still get into the postal
system.
In order to discourage unsafe
practices, the Postal Service is seeking
input from the mailing community
about how to prevent overweight
packages from entering the postal
system, and if they get into the postal
system, the appropriate postage to be
paid. The maximum weight for postage
payment is 70 pounds.
Suggested Remedies
One partial remedy would be to assess
additional postage on overweight
parcels discovered in the postal
network. Thus, if a package weight is 75
pounds, and it arrives at the destination
office, with postage calculated at 70
pounds, an additional 5 pounds worth
of postage could be collected (70 plus
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5). Or if the item is 80 pounds, postage
would be collected on the additional 10
pounds. This would appear to provide
the Postal Service with at least some
degree of reimbursement for the extra
service provided.
As a further deterrent, another
possibility would be to charge not only
additional postage, but an additional
penalty fee (perhaps $20.00). Thus, for
an 80 pound parcel the total amount
due would include the postage payment
for 70 pounds, a postage surcharge for
the additional 10 pounds and a $20
penalty.
Since HAZMAT parcels have lower
maximum weight limits, and overweight
HAZMAT parcels may pose additional
safety challenges, it would seem
appropriate to provide an additional
element of deterrence with regard to the
mailing of such items. Thus, for
example, if a 65-pound HAZMAT
package exceeded the maximum weight
limit of 25 pounds, the amount due
might include not only the postage on
the actual weight of the package, but an
additional surcharge of $20.00 for each
10 pounds (or fraction thereof) in excess
of the applicable weight limit.
We look forward to feedback on this
important safety issue.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–21150 Filed 10–2–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0396; FRL–9968–53–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; 2011 Base Year Inventory
for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard for the
Baltimore, Maryland Nonattainment
Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve, as a
state implementation plan (SIP)
revision, the 2011 base year inventory
for the Baltimore, Maryland moderate
nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) submitted by the
State of Maryland through the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE).
In the Final Rules section of this issue
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21150]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Overweight Parcels
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is contemplating amendment of the Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM[supreg]), to address the challenges presented by overweight
parcels that make their way into the postal network. To aid us in this
effort, we are requesting comments from the postal community regarding
a variety of suggested actions to resolve or ameliorate this problem.
Overweight parcels for the purpose of this notice are defined as
anything in excess of 70 pounds or the maximum weight allowed for
HAZMAT.
DATES: Submit comments on or before November 2, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to the manager, Product
Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Room 4446,
Washington, DC 20260-5015. If sending comments by email, include the
name and address of the commenter and send to
ProductClassification@usps.gov, with a subject line of ``Overweight
Parcels.'' Faxed comments are not accepted.
You may inspect and photocopy all written comments, by appointment
only, at USPS[supreg] Headquarters Library, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW.,
11th Floor North, Washington, DC 20260. These records are available for
review on Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-4 p.m., by calling 202-268-
2906.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions or comments to
Lizbeth J. Dobbins by email at lizbeth.j.dobbins@usps.gov or phone
(202) 268-3789.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Challenge of Overweight Parcels
Overweight parcels should never be accepted for delivery into the
postal network. On occasion an item, such as a returns parcel, gets
into the Postal network and arrives at a destination plant or post
office. It is unsafe to return the item back through the postal network
so the receiving office contacts the customer and asks the customer to
pick up the package. Sometimes the package is abandoned which creates
another safety issue trying to dispose of the overweight item.
Part of the challenge is that we do not want overweight items at
any time since these items cause numerous safety issues and we strongly
discourage mailers from entering them into the postal system. We do not
accept them at postal retail counters either and yet, these items still
get into the postal system.
In order to discourage unsafe practices, the Postal Service is
seeking input from the mailing community about how to prevent
overweight packages from entering the postal system, and if they get
into the postal system, the appropriate postage to be paid. The maximum
weight for postage payment is 70 pounds.
Suggested Remedies
One partial remedy would be to assess additional postage on
overweight parcels discovered in the postal network. Thus, if a package
weight is 75 pounds, and it arrives at the destination office, with
postage calculated at 70 pounds, an additional 5 pounds worth of
postage could be collected (70 plus 5). Or if the item is 80 pounds,
postage would be collected on the additional 10 pounds. This would
appear to provide the Postal Service with at least some degree of
reimbursement for the extra service provided.
As a further deterrent, another possibility would be to charge not
only additional postage, but an additional penalty fee (perhaps
$20.00). Thus, for an 80 pound parcel the total amount due would
include the postage payment for 70 pounds, a postage surcharge for the
additional 10 pounds and a $20 penalty.
Since HAZMAT parcels have lower maximum weight limits, and
overweight HAZMAT parcels may pose additional safety challenges, it
would seem appropriate to provide an additional element of deterrence
with regard to the mailing of such items. Thus, for example, if a 65-
pound HAZMAT package exceeded the maximum weight limit of 25 pounds,
the amount due might include not only the postage on the actual weight
of the package, but an additional surcharge of $20.00 for each 10
pounds (or fraction thereof) in excess of the applicable weight limit.
We look forward to feedback on this important safety issue.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-21150 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P