Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests; Apache, Coconino, Greenlee and Navajo Counties, Arizona; Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Public Motorized Travel Management Plan, 45800-45802 [2017-21009]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
45800
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
where fish-bearing would be the highest
priority followed by non-fish bearing
perennial streams (these would be
determined and prioritized based on
field review); replacing crossings on
perennial streams with structures
appropriately sized for a 100-year event
(these would be prioritized by the
district fisheries biologist); and stabilize
eroding sections of road that may be
accomplished by blading followed by
spot rocking or the addition of drainage
structures where needed.
• Road maintenance and
reconditioning would occur on
approximately 157 miles of system
roads. Maintenance consist of culvert
cleaning, surface blading, and roadside
brushing; and reconditioning includes
minor road reshaping, waterbar
removal, and road surface brush
removal.
• Road decommissioning is proposed
on approximately 60 miles of system
road and approximately 30 miles of
non-system road. In most cases this
includes fully re-contouring the road.
• Approximately 4 miles of system
roads would be converted to an offhighway vehicle (OHV) trail.
• Approximately 0.74 miles of new
system roads would be constructed to
contribute to the long term
transportation system while reducing
roads located within riparian habitat
conservation areas.
The following actions are proposed to
improve soil and vegetation conditions
in the Musselshell Restoration Area
portion (1,600 acres) of the project area:
• Approximately 745 acres of white
pine restoration would be accomplished
through intermediate harvest by creating
small openings to plant blister rust
resistant seedlings, benefit other
species, and contribute to ecosystem
health.
• Approximately 92 acres of riparian
habitat conservation area (RHCA)
restoration would occur where RHCAs
of perennial streams are overstocked
with trees. Trees would be
commercially thinned to promote a
healthy stand and promote long term
RHCA function.
• Soil rehabilitation would occur on
approximately 55 acres of currently
detrimentally disturbed areas associated
with past harvest related activities.
Activities could include decompaction,
mastication, fertilization, seeding, and
addition of woody/organic material.
• Deferred maintenance would occur
on mile of Trail #853. Work may
include improvement and development
of drainage structures within the
existing tread. Rock and/or gravel
material may be placed on the exiting
tread surface to complement the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
drainage structures and provide
adequate base to support motorized
OHV use, reduce erosion, and loss of
fine materials.
The Lolo Insect & Disease project will
also include a variety of project design
criteria that have been developed from
past projects, verified by field surveys,
and will be used to limit possible
adverse effects to soils, water quality,
fish and wildlife habitat, recreation
opportunities, and culturally significant
areas.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the No Action and the
Proposed Action, alternatives that do
not harvest in riparian habitat
conservation areas, within the Eldorado
Creek Roadless Area and special areas of
historic or tribal significance (such as
the National Historic Landmark
corridor), as well as minimal temporary
road construction with more helicopter
logging are expected. These preliminary
alternatives were developed based on
prior scoping comments received.
Alternatives will be developed based on
previous and additional comments
received during the scoping periods.
Responsible Official
Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest
Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will
determine whether to adopt the
proposed action or another alternative,
in whole or in part, and what mitigation
measurements and management
requirements will be implemented.
Preliminary Issues
Issues received during the previous
scoping period include harvesting in the
Eldorado Creek Roadless Area, the
National Historic Landmark corridor,
and other special areas of historic or
tribal significance; riparian habitat
conservation area thinning, helicopter
logging systems, winter logging, and
minimal road construction.
Permits or Licenses Required
Any required permits for disturbance
of water or wetlands would be obtained
prior to initiating work (Army Corps of
Engineers 404 permit, Idaho Department
of Water Resources Stream Alteration
Permit). Any additional mitigation
measures identified in the permitting
process would be incorporated into the
project plans.
Scoping Process
This Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the EIS. The
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interdisciplinary team will continue to
seek information and comments from
Federal, State, and local agencies, Tribal
governments, and other individuals or
organizations that may interested in, or
affected by, the proposed action. There
is a collaborative group in the area that
the interdisciplinary team will interact
with during the analysis process. It is
important that reviewers provide their
comments at such times and in such
manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Dated: September 13, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National
Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017–21008 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests;
Apache, Coconino, Greenlee and
Navajo Counties, Arizona; Revised
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for Public Motorized Travel
Management Plan
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised Notice of Intent (NOI).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is revising
the Environmental Impact Statement for
the Public Motorized Travel
Management Plan on the ApacheSitgreaves National Forests.
DATES: Comments concerning the 2010
DEIS were received by December 13,
2010, 45 days from the date of
publication of the Notice of Availabiliy
(NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal
Register (75 FR 66756). An additional
45 day comment period will occur after
the publication of the revised DEIS in
the Federal Register. The revised DEIS
is expected in the summer of 2018 and
the final EIS is expected in the winter
of 2019.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
Send written inquiries to
Travel Management, Apache-Sitgreaves
National Forests, P.O. Box 640,
Springerville, AZ 85938. Inquiries may
also be sent via email to commentssouthwestern-apache-sitgreaves@
fs.fed.us with ‘‘Travel Management’’ in
the subject line. Inquiries may also be
sent via facsimile to (928) 333–5966.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie O’Connor Card, Team Leader at
(406) 522–2537 or jennieoconnorcard@
fs.fed.us; or, Tim Gilloon, NEPA
Program Manager at (928) 333–6333 or
tgilloon@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: : On
October 10, 2007, the Federal Register
published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement for the Public Motorized
Travel Management Plan on the
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (72
FR 57514–57517). On October 31, 2007,
the Federal Register published a
corrected NOI for that document (72 FR
61607). On February 29, 2008 the
Federal Register published a revised
NOI for those documents (73 FR 11088–
11091). The Forest Service is hereby
entirely revising all those NOI
documents, Federal Register of October
10, 2007 (72 FR 57514–57517), Federal
Register of October 31, 2007 (72 FR
61607) and Federal Register of February
29, 2008 (73 FR 11088–11091), to read
as follows.
Revision: The Forest Service is
preparing a Revised Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for the Apache-Sitgreaves Public
Motorized Travel Management Plan (the
Project) on the Apache-Sitgreaves
National Forests (the Forests). The
Forest Service is issuing this NOI to
advise the public and agencies that we
will be preparing a revised DEIS using
new information, based on changed
conditions, in order to make the best
possible decision. The new information
includes: Changed conditions due to the
Wallow Fire of 2011; the 2015 Land
Management Plan for the ApacheSitgreaves National Forests (the Forest
Plan); changes in aquatic and terrestrial
species status; more accurate road
mapping based on Light Detection and
Ranging (LIDAR) data and aerial
photography; and Forest Service
decisions made under the National
Environmental Policy Act since the
2010 DEIS. The revised DEIS will use
the 2010 DEIS as a foundation, and will
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
consider all public comments received;
the revised DEIS does not change the
nature or scope of the proposed action.
The Project proposes to designate
which routes (roads and trails) and areas
on federal lands administered by the
Forests are open to motorized travel.
This proposed action will bring the
Forests into compliance with the Travel
Management Rule (36 CFR 212, subpart
B) to provide for a system of National
Forest System (NFS) roads, motorized
trails, and motorized areas designed for
motor vehicle use. The proposed action
prohibits cross-country travel and motor
vehicle use off the designated system.
This proposed action also will designate
use of motor vehicles within a specified
distance of certain designated routes for
the purposes of dispersed camping and/
or retrieval of a downed big game
animal.
The Forest Service will produce a
Motorized Vehicle Use Map (MVUM)
that displays those routes and areas on
the Forests that are open to motorized
travel. The MVUM will be the primary
tool used to determine compliance and
enforcement with motor vehicle use
designations. Existing routes,
unauthorized routes, and areas not
designated as open on the MVUM will
be legally closed to motorized travel
except as allowed by permit or other
authorization. The decisions on
motorized travel do not include oversnow travel or existing winter-use
recreation.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this project is to
comply with the Travel Management
Rule by providing a system of roads,
trails, and areas designated for motor
vehicle use that reduces impacts to
biological, physical, and cultural
resources on the forests (36 CFR 212,
sections 212, 251, 261). At 36 CFR
261.13, the Forests are required to
prohibit motor vehicle use off the
system of designated roads, trails, and
areas and motor vehicle use that is not
in accordance with the designations.
There is a need for a safe and efficient
transportation system for public use,
Agency administration, and resource
protection, while recognizing historic
and current uses of the forests.
Specifically, there is a need for: (1)
Identifying the system of roads that
would be open to motor vehicle use; (2)
identifying the system of motorized
trails for vehicles 50 inches or less in
width; and (3) optional designation of
the limited use of motor vehicles within
a specified distance of designated routes
solely for the purposes of dispersed
camping or retrieval of big game by an
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45801
individual who has legally killed the
animal.
There is a need to counter detrimental
effects to resources from continued use
of some roads and motorized trails, as
well as cross-country travel. Some
detrimental effects from motorized use
of the Forests include increased
sediment deposits in streams which
degrade water quality and fish habitat,
the spread of invasive plants across the
forests, disturbances to a variety of plant
and wildlife species, and the risk of
damaging cultural resource sites.
Changed Conditions
The changed conditions and new
information since the 2010 DEIS, which
lead to the need for a revised
environmental analysis, are
incorporated in the updated alternatives
being considered in detail. The first
substantive change stemmed from the
Wallow Fire of 2011, which resulted in
changes to the physical environment
within the project area. The fire resulted
in changes in the ecology of the
landscape, creating a need to conduct
significant restoration and monitoring
efforts in order to return the Forests to
its natural fire regime. The Forest Plan
is another substantive change to the
existing conditions. This has changed
the desired conditions, standards and
guidelines, and suitability directing how
the Forests are managed. The Forest
Plan provides overarching management
direction for how motorized travel will
be managed on the Forests.
In addition, changes in aquatic and
terrestrial species status under the
Endangered Species Act for threatened
and endangered species, and under
Forest Service policy for sensitive
species, resulted in another changed
condition. Critical and sensitive habitats
for some species can be found across the
Forests which must now be considered
and analyzed. Additionally, the Forests
updated the existing conditions in the
databases of record to match the on-theground conditions using LIDAR data
and aerial photography. The result of
this corrects or clarifies the existing
physical NFS roads, changing the
baseline of which the alternatives
considered are compared against.
Other decisions made under the
National Environmental Policy Act
since the 2010 draft EIS by the Forests
changed the existing conditions and led
to changes in the action alternatives.
While the Project is proposing to look at
the entire National Forest System of
roads, numerous decisions about
specific roads and trails have been made
since 2010 that provide definitive
environmental analysis and designation
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
45802
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
for those roads and trails that does not
require redundant analysis.
Collectively, these changes will be
analyzed and incorporated into the
revised DEIS, which will be circulated
for public comment. The previous
public comments and analysis will be
used as the foundation for this revision.
At the time that the revised DEIS is
circulated, the public will have the
opportunity to comment on the entire
DEIS, including portions that have not
been revised.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Preliminary Issues
The Forest analyzed all scoping
comments received in 2007 to identify
issues, which are defined as cause-effect
relationships directly or indirectly
caused by implementing the proposed
action. The issues defined as within the
scope of the project, and directly or
indirectly caused by implementing the
proposal, were used to develop the
range of action alternatives. Four issues
were identified: (1) Restricting
motorized access for dispersed camping;
(2) restricting motorized big game
retrieval; (3) impacts to resources from
motorized use; and, (4) economics: loss
of revenues and jobs.
Proposed Action
The revised proposed action would
designate a system of roads, trails, and
areas for motorized use as well as
motorized access for dispersed camping
and motorized access for big game
retrieval. The road system would have
15 percent fewer roads and 68 percent
more motorized trails than the current
system. That would result in 2,890
miles of NFS roads open to public
motorized travel, including 2,143 miles
of roads that are open to both highway
legal and off-highway vehicles. Also,
this would result in 270 miles of
motorized trails across the Forests, with
20 miles open to all vehicles and 182
miles open to vehicles less than 50
inches wide.
The proposed action would designate
300 feet from either side of around 35
percent of the designated open roads
(1,027 miles) for the sole purpose of
accessing dispersed camping locations
with motor vehicles. Motorized big
game retrieval would be allowed within
a 1-mile distance off the designated road
and motorized trail system (1.2 million
acres) for elk. No other species would be
retrieved using motor vehicles. There
would be one motorized use area
designated (17 acres). All other cross
country travel would be prohibited.
Possible Alternatives
The revised DEIS will analyze three
alternatives in detail. These revised
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
alternatives used the 2010 DEIS as a
foundation and the public comments
received from that DEIS.
Alternative 1 (no action) represents
the existing transportation system and
proposes no changes. The existing
system includes 3,418 miles of open
roads and 127 miles of motorized trails.
Cross-country travel off system roads on
around 1.6 million acres would
continue, except where currently
prohibited. This alternative is not be
compliant with the travel management
rule because it does not designate a
system of roads, trails and areas for
motorized use.
Alternative 2 is the Proposed Action,
which would designate a system of
roads, trails, and areas for motorized use
as well as motorized access for
dispersed camping and motorized
access for big game retrieval. The road
system would have 15 percent fewer
roads and 68 percent more motorized
trails than the current system. That
would result in 2,890 miles of NFS
roads open to public motorized travel,
including 2,143 miles of roads that are
open to both highway legal and offhighway vehicles.
Alternative 3 is being designated to
address the following issues: (1)
Restricting motorized access for
dispersed camping; (2) restricting
motorized big game retrieval; and, (3)
impacts to resources from motorized
use.
Scoping Process
The proposed action outlined in this
revised NOI is identical to the scope of
the proposed action that was originally
scoped, and therefore a new scoping
period is not required. The original
scoping process solicited over 20,000
public comments, which are being used
to guide the development of the revised
DEIS. Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will also be accepted and
considered.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the Forest
Supervisor of the Apache-Sitgreaves
National Forests, P.O. Box 640,
Springerville, AZ 85938.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the effects to social, natural,
and cultural resources, the Forest
Supervisor will decide what changes to
make to the current motorized travel
system to be compliant with the Travel
Management Rule. The decision will
also include whether to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
motorized access for dispersed camping,
whether to designate motorized use
areas, and whether to provide access for
motorized big game retrieval. The
Record of Decision, which will be
published after analyzing the public’s
comments, will document the decision
with the rationale.
Dated: September 15, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National
Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017–21009 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Kemmerer Ranger District; BridgerTeton National Forest; Wyoming;
Kemmerer Grazing and Rangeland
Vegetation Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised Notice of Intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Bridger-Teton National
Forest will prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the
effects of continued authorization of
grazing on 17 sheep allotments on the
Kemmerer Ranger District in southwest
Wyoming.
DATES: Although comments are accepted
at any time, two designated comment
periods concerning the scope of the
analysis were established: June 26, 2017
through July 26, 2017 and November 17,
2008 through January 2, 2009.
Comments will be accepted for an
additional 30 days after October 2, 2017.
The Draft EIS is expected in June 2018.
Following its release, an opportunity to
comment on the Draft EIS will be
provided. The Final EIS is expected
June 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Kemmerer Ranger District, 308 U.S.
Highway 189 North, Kemmerer, WY
83101. Comments may also be sent via
email to comments-intermtn-bridgerteton-kemmerer@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 307–828–5135. Please put
‘‘Comments on Kemmerer Grazing’’ in
the subject line.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45800-45802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21009]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests; Apache, Coconino, Greenlee
and Navajo Counties, Arizona; Revised Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for Public Motorized Travel Management Plan
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent (NOI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is revising the Environmental Impact
Statement for the Public Motorized Travel Management Plan on the
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests.
DATES: Comments concerning the 2010 DEIS were received by December 13,
2010, 45 days from the date of publication of the Notice of Availabiliy
(NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal Register (75 FR 66756). An
additional 45 day comment period will occur after the publication of
the revised DEIS in the Federal Register. The revised DEIS is expected
in the summer of 2018 and the final EIS is expected in the winter of
2019.
[[Page 45801]]
ADDRESSES: Send written inquiries to Travel Management, Apache-
Sitgreaves National Forests, P.O. Box 640, Springerville, AZ 85938.
Inquiries may also be sent via email to comments-southwestern-apache-sitgreaves@fs.fed.us with ``Travel Management'' in the subject line.
Inquiries may also be sent via facsimile to (928) 333-5966.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie O'Connor Card, Team Leader at
(406) 522-2537 or jennieoconnorcard@fs.fed.us; or, Tim Gilloon, NEPA
Program Manager at (928) 333-6333 or tgilloon@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: : On October 10, 2007, the Federal Register
published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement for the Public Motorized Travel Management Plan on the
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (72 FR 57514-57517). On October 31,
2007, the Federal Register published a corrected NOI for that document
(72 FR 61607). On February 29, 2008 the Federal Register published a
revised NOI for those documents (73 FR 11088-11091). The Forest Service
is hereby entirely revising all those NOI documents, Federal Register
of October 10, 2007 (72 FR 57514-57517), Federal Register of October
31, 2007 (72 FR 61607) and Federal Register of February 29, 2008 (73 FR
11088-11091), to read as follows.
Revision: The Forest Service is preparing a Revised Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Apache-Sitgreaves Public
Motorized Travel Management Plan (the Project) on the Apache-Sitgreaves
National Forests (the Forests). The Forest Service is issuing this NOI
to advise the public and agencies that we will be preparing a revised
DEIS using new information, based on changed conditions, in order to
make the best possible decision. The new information includes: Changed
conditions due to the Wallow Fire of 2011; the 2015 Land Management
Plan for the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (the Forest Plan);
changes in aquatic and terrestrial species status; more accurate road
mapping based on Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data and aerial
photography; and Forest Service decisions made under the National
Environmental Policy Act since the 2010 DEIS. The revised DEIS will use
the 2010 DEIS as a foundation, and will consider all public comments
received; the revised DEIS does not change the nature or scope of the
proposed action.
The Project proposes to designate which routes (roads and trails)
and areas on federal lands administered by the Forests are open to
motorized travel. This proposed action will bring the Forests into
compliance with the Travel Management Rule (36 CFR 212, subpart B) to
provide for a system of National Forest System (NFS) roads, motorized
trails, and motorized areas designed for motor vehicle use. The
proposed action prohibits cross-country travel and motor vehicle use
off the designated system. This proposed action also will designate use
of motor vehicles within a specified distance of certain designated
routes for the purposes of dispersed camping and/or retrieval of a
downed big game animal.
The Forest Service will produce a Motorized Vehicle Use Map (MVUM)
that displays those routes and areas on the Forests that are open to
motorized travel. The MVUM will be the primary tool used to determine
compliance and enforcement with motor vehicle use designations.
Existing routes, unauthorized routes, and areas not designated as open
on the MVUM will be legally closed to motorized travel except as
allowed by permit or other authorization. The decisions on motorized
travel do not include over-snow travel or existing winter-use
recreation.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this project is to comply with the Travel Management
Rule by providing a system of roads, trails, and areas designated for
motor vehicle use that reduces impacts to biological, physical, and
cultural resources on the forests (36 CFR 212, sections 212, 251, 261).
At 36 CFR 261.13, the Forests are required to prohibit motor vehicle
use off the system of designated roads, trails, and areas and motor
vehicle use that is not in accordance with the designations.
There is a need for a safe and efficient transportation system for
public use, Agency administration, and resource protection, while
recognizing historic and current uses of the forests. Specifically,
there is a need for: (1) Identifying the system of roads that would be
open to motor vehicle use; (2) identifying the system of motorized
trails for vehicles 50 inches or less in width; and (3) optional
designation of the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified
distance of designated routes solely for the purposes of dispersed
camping or retrieval of big game by an individual who has legally
killed the animal.
There is a need to counter detrimental effects to resources from
continued use of some roads and motorized trails, as well as cross-
country travel. Some detrimental effects from motorized use of the
Forests include increased sediment deposits in streams which degrade
water quality and fish habitat, the spread of invasive plants across
the forests, disturbances to a variety of plant and wildlife species,
and the risk of damaging cultural resource sites.
Changed Conditions
The changed conditions and new information since the 2010 DEIS,
which lead to the need for a revised environmental analysis, are
incorporated in the updated alternatives being considered in detail.
The first substantive change stemmed from the Wallow Fire of 2011,
which resulted in changes to the physical environment within the
project area. The fire resulted in changes in the ecology of the
landscape, creating a need to conduct significant restoration and
monitoring efforts in order to return the Forests to its natural fire
regime. The Forest Plan is another substantive change to the existing
conditions. This has changed the desired conditions, standards and
guidelines, and suitability directing how the Forests are managed. The
Forest Plan provides overarching management direction for how motorized
travel will be managed on the Forests.
In addition, changes in aquatic and terrestrial species status
under the Endangered Species Act for threatened and endangered species,
and under Forest Service policy for sensitive species, resulted in
another changed condition. Critical and sensitive habitats for some
species can be found across the Forests which must now be considered
and analyzed. Additionally, the Forests updated the existing conditions
in the databases of record to match the on-the-ground conditions using
LIDAR data and aerial photography. The result of this corrects or
clarifies the existing physical NFS roads, changing the baseline of
which the alternatives considered are compared against.
Other decisions made under the National Environmental Policy Act
since the 2010 draft EIS by the Forests changed the existing conditions
and led to changes in the action alternatives. While the Project is
proposing to look at the entire National Forest System of roads,
numerous decisions about specific roads and trails have been made since
2010 that provide definitive environmental analysis and designation
[[Page 45802]]
for those roads and trails that does not require redundant analysis.
Collectively, these changes will be analyzed and incorporated into
the revised DEIS, which will be circulated for public comment. The
previous public comments and analysis will be used as the foundation
for this revision. At the time that the revised DEIS is circulated, the
public will have the opportunity to comment on the entire DEIS,
including portions that have not been revised.
Preliminary Issues
The Forest analyzed all scoping comments received in 2007 to
identify issues, which are defined as cause-effect relationships
directly or indirectly caused by implementing the proposed action. The
issues defined as within the scope of the project, and directly or
indirectly caused by implementing the proposal, were used to develop
the range of action alternatives. Four issues were identified: (1)
Restricting motorized access for dispersed camping; (2) restricting
motorized big game retrieval; (3) impacts to resources from motorized
use; and, (4) economics: loss of revenues and jobs.
Proposed Action
The revised proposed action would designate a system of roads,
trails, and areas for motorized use as well as motorized access for
dispersed camping and motorized access for big game retrieval. The road
system would have 15 percent fewer roads and 68 percent more motorized
trails than the current system. That would result in 2,890 miles of NFS
roads open to public motorized travel, including 2,143 miles of roads
that are open to both highway legal and off-highway vehicles. Also,
this would result in 270 miles of motorized trails across the Forests,
with 20 miles open to all vehicles and 182 miles open to vehicles less
than 50 inches wide.
The proposed action would designate 300 feet from either side of
around 35 percent of the designated open roads (1,027 miles) for the
sole purpose of accessing dispersed camping locations with motor
vehicles. Motorized big game retrieval would be allowed within a 1-mile
distance off the designated road and motorized trail system (1.2
million acres) for elk. No other species would be retrieved using motor
vehicles. There would be one motorized use area designated (17 acres).
All other cross country travel would be prohibited.
Possible Alternatives
The revised DEIS will analyze three alternatives in detail. These
revised alternatives used the 2010 DEIS as a foundation and the public
comments received from that DEIS.
Alternative 1 (no action) represents the existing transportation
system and proposes no changes. The existing system includes 3,418
miles of open roads and 127 miles of motorized trails. Cross-country
travel off system roads on around 1.6 million acres would continue,
except where currently prohibited. This alternative is not be compliant
with the travel management rule because it does not designate a system
of roads, trails and areas for motorized use.
Alternative 2 is the Proposed Action, which would designate a
system of roads, trails, and areas for motorized use as well as
motorized access for dispersed camping and motorized access for big
game retrieval. The road system would have 15 percent fewer roads and
68 percent more motorized trails than the current system. That would
result in 2,890 miles of NFS roads open to public motorized travel,
including 2,143 miles of roads that are open to both highway legal and
off-highway vehicles.
Alternative 3 is being designated to address the following issues:
(1) Restricting motorized access for dispersed camping; (2) restricting
motorized big game retrieval; and, (3) impacts to resources from
motorized use.
Scoping Process
The proposed action outlined in this revised NOI is identical to
the scope of the proposed action that was originally scoped, and
therefore a new scoping period is not required. The original scoping
process solicited over 20,000 public comments, which are being used to
guide the development of the revised DEIS. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those
who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed
action. Comments submitted anonymously will also be accepted and
considered.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the Forest Supervisor of the Apache-
Sitgreaves National Forests, P.O. Box 640, Springerville, AZ 85938.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Based on the effects to social, natural, and cultural resources,
the Forest Supervisor will decide what changes to make to the current
motorized travel system to be compliant with the Travel Management
Rule. The decision will also include whether to provide motorized
access for dispersed camping, whether to designate motorized use areas,
and whether to provide access for motorized big game retrieval. The
Record of Decision, which will be published after analyzing the
public's comments, will document the decision with the rationale.
Dated: September 15, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-21009 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P