Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District; California; Elk Creek Watershed Project, 45797-45798 [2017-21005]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
September 2017.
Michael C. Gregoire,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–21105 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger
District; California; Elk Creek
Watershed Project
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
The purpose of the Elk Creek
Watershed Project is to address the need
to manage forest stands to be more
resilient to future disturbances, improve
water quality to maintain and restore
riparian and aquatic habitat, improve
terrestrial habitat for northern spotted
owl and Roosevelt elk, reduce fuel
accumulations, and improve the vigor
and prevalence of Karuk cultural
resources.
SUMMARY:
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
November 16, 2017. The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected June 2018 and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected February 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
P.O. Box 377, Happy Camp, CA 96039.
Comments may also be sent via email to
jchastain@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
(530) 493–1796. Submit electronic
comments at the Klamath National
Forest’s project Web page: https://
www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/
?project=46553.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dock Chastain, (530) 493–1742,
jchastain@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for this project
is to:
• Reduce fuel accumulations and
create ridgetop fuel breaks to increase
options for managing planned and
unplanned ignitions;
• Improve water quality to maintain
and restore riparian and aquatic habitat;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
• Maximize efficiency of system
roads and trails that provide public
access to the Forest while minimizing
resource impacts;
• Manage forest stands to be more
resilient to future disturbances and
improve terrestrial habitat for northern
spotted owl and Roosevelt elk;
• Contribute to local and regional
economies by providing forest products
and enhancing recreational
opportunities; and
• Improve the vigor and prevalence of
Karuk cultural resources that were
historically present in the planning area.
Proposed Action
The proposed action was designed to
meet the purpose and need of the
project. The proposed action would
treat about 10,550 acres within the
45,992-acre project boundary. Acres by
treatment type are described below and
do not account for overlap in treatment
types (acres receiving multiple
treatments may be double counted).
Treatment acreages are approximate at
this point and may be adjusted and
refined following scoping. The proposed
action also addresses the existing
condition of the National Forest
Transportation System (Forest System)
by treating legacy sites, changing road
maintenance levels, and
decommissioning roads. All treatments
would manage for improving the health
and vigor of hardwood species
according to the Klamath National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan (Forest Plan). Riparian Reserves
within and adjacent to treatment units
would be evaluated on a site-by-site
basis for treatment, and would include
equipment and treatment exclusion
zones.
This project would include the
following eight types of vegetation
treatments: (1) Commercial thinning; (2)
noncommercial thinning; (3) hardwood
enhancement; (4) meadow
enhancement; (5) fuels reduction
adjacent to private property; (6)
defensible fuel profile zones; (7)
roadside fuels reduction; and (8)
underburning. This project would use a
travel analysis for recommending
management levels of existing Forest
System roads and would develop new
opportunities for recreation through the
addition of new trails.
(1) Commercial Thinning (1,782
acres): Commercial thinning is an
intermediate harvest with the objective
of reducing stand density primarily to
improve growth, enhance forest health,
and other resources objectives.
Treatment can recover potential
mortality while producing merchantable
material.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45797
(2) Noncommercial Thinning (1,256
acres): Noncommercial thinning is an
intermediate harvest which removes the
less desirable trees of any species in a
stand of poles or larger trees primarily
to improve the composition and quality
of the stand.
(3) Hardwood Enhancement (76
acres): Hardwood enhancement would
focus on stimulating the growth and
available resources for preferred
hardwood species according to the
Forest Plan.
(4) Meadow Enhancement (18 acres):
Meadow enhancement treatments
would focus on reducing conifer
encroachment by removing conifer
seedlings and saplings growing within
the meadow footprint.
(5) Fuels reduction Adjacent to
Private Property (153 acres): Fuel breaks
created to protect private property
would extend up to 500 feet adjacent to
private property. The fuel treatments
would involve cutting and pile burning
of ladder fuels: Brush, hardwoods, and
conifer trees up to ten inches diameter
at breast height.
(6) Defensible Fuel Profile Zone (823
acres): The width of the defensible fuel
profile zone would be up to 250 feet on
either side of proposed ridge lines. The
fuel treatments would involve cutting
and pile burning of ladder fuels: Brush,
hardwoods, and conifer trees up to ten
inches diameter at breast height.
(7) Roadside Fuels Reduction (1,896
acres): The roadside fuel breaks would
extend up to 300 feet above and 50 feet
below either side of identified Forest
System and county roads adjacent to
Forest Service lands. The fuel
treatments would involve cutting and
pile burning of ladder fuels: Brush,
hardwoods, and conifer trees up to ten
inches diameter at breast height.
(8) Underburning (4,552 acres):
Underburn units are intended to be
burned at low to moderate intensities to
reduce fuel loadings and reduce the risk
of catastrophic fire. Travel Analysis—A
risk and benefit analysis was conducted
for Forest System roads within the East
Fork Elk Creek and Lower Elk Creek 6th
field watersheds. Road treatments
include 22 miles of decommissioning,
15 miles of downgrading maintenance
levels, 10 miles of upgrading
maintenance levels, and treating
associated legacy sites. In addition to
Forest System road actions, four miles
of non-system roads would be
rehabilitated.
This project would also include
recreation improvements, including the
construction of 4.3 miles of new multiuse trails and up to 13 miles of
mountain bike trail.
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
45798
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
Connected Actions
Access: Access for this project would
be mainly accomplished by use of roads
on the National Forest Transportation
System. About three miles of temporary
roads would be needed to facilitate
commercial thinning operations. Most
of these temporary roads would occur
on existing roadbeds. However, several
short new temporary spur roads would
also be constructed. Both new and
existing temporary roads would be
hydrologically stabilized at the end of
the project.
Landings: Existing landings would be
used where possible. Landing size
would be appropriately sized for
operational safety. Cable landings
would use roads where possible. Cable
landings off the road system and
ground-based landings would average
one acre in size but would not exceed
1.5 acres in size. Both new and existing
landings would be hydrologically
stabilized at the end of the project.
Responsible Official
Patricia A. Grantham, Klamath
National Forest, Forest Supervisor.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service is the lead agency
for the project. Based on the result of the
NEPA analysis, the Klamath National
Forest, Forest Supervisor’s Record of
Decision regarding the Elk Creek
Watershed Project will recommend
implementation of one of the following:
(1) The proposed action and
mitigations necessary to minimize or
avoid adverse impacts;
(2) An alternative to the proposed
action and mitigations necessary to
minimize or avoid adverse impacts; or
(3) The no-action alternative.
The Record of Decision will also
document the consistency of the
proposed action or one of the
alternatives with the Klamath National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the Environmental
Impact Statement.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National
Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017–21005 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests;
Idaho; Lolo Insect & Disease Project
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
This is a corrected Notice of
Intent (NOI). This notice updates the
information about the purpose and
need, proposed action, expected dates of
the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and Final EIS,
addresses, contact information for the
project, and the responsible official for
the Lolo Insect & Disease project. This
notice also provides clarification for
individuals or organizations that
provided comments in response to
scoping previously conducted as it
relates to having standing to object.
Preliminary issues, alternatives, and
permits are also available and presented
in this notice.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
October 17, 2017. The Draft EIS is
expected January of 2018 and the Final
EIS is expected August of 2018. This
project was originally scoped under the
provisions of 36 CFR 215. For this
project, individuals or organizations
who submitted written comments in
response to scoping conducted under 36
CFR 215 will be considered to have
standing to object under 36 CFR 218,
Subparts A and B. Those who also wish
to establish standing to object under 36
CFR part 218 should submit scoping
comments no later than 15 days after
publication of this Notice of Intent or
during the 45-day comment period
following distribution of the Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Lochsa Ranger District, c/o Sara
Daugherty, 502 Lowry Street, Kooskia,
Idaho 83539. Comments may also be
sent via email to comments-northernclearwater-lochsa@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 208–926–6450.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For
more information please contact Sara
Daugherty at 208–926–6404 or
sddaugherty@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest
Service gives notice of its intent to
prepare an EIS for the Lolo Insect &
Disease project to analyze and disclose
the effects of proposed forest
management and watershed
improvement activities within the Lolo
Creek watershed, located approximately
16 miles northeast of Kamiah, Idaho.
The proposed action would use a
combination of timber harvest and
reforestation to achieve the desired
range of age classes, size classes,
vegetative species distributions, habitat
complexity (diversity), and landscape
patterns across the forested portions of
the project area. Road decommissioning,
culvert replacements, road and trail
improvements, and soils rehabilitation
are also proposed to improve watershed
health. The EIS will analyze the effects
of the proposed action and alternatives.
The Nez Perce-Clearwater National
Forests invites comments and
suggestions on the issues to be
addressed. The agency gives notice of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis and decision making
process on the proposal so interested
and affected members of the public may
participate and contribute to the final
decision. The original notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 25, 2013; 78 FR 24718. This
process is being conducted pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
and Forest Service NEPA guidelines.
Additionally, pursuant to Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act,
the public scoping process will allow
members of the general public to
provide comments on potential impacts
to historic and cultural resources for the
proposed action. An objection priod for
the Draft Record of Decision will be
provided, consistent with 36 CFR part
218.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Purpose and Need for Action
Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
Improvement
Existing Condition: Most of the
project area is in Forest Plan
management area (MA) E1. MA E1 is
timber-producing land to be managed
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45797-45798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21005]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District; California; Elk Creek
Watershed Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of the Elk Creek Watershed Project is to address
the need to manage forest stands to be more resilient to future
disturbances, improve water quality to maintain and restore riparian
and aquatic habitat, improve terrestrial habitat for northern spotted
owl and Roosevelt elk, reduce fuel accumulations, and improve the vigor
and prevalence of Karuk cultural resources.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by November 16, 2017. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is
expected June 2018 and the Final Environmental Impact Statement is
expected February 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to P.O. Box 377, Happy Camp, CA 96039.
Comments may also be sent via email to jchastain@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (530) 493-1796. Submit electronic comments at the Klamath
National Forest's project Web page: https://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=46553.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dock Chastain, (530) 493-1742,
jchastain@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for this project is to:
Reduce fuel accumulations and create ridgetop fuel breaks
to increase options for managing planned and unplanned ignitions;
Improve water quality to maintain and restore riparian and
aquatic habitat;
Maximize efficiency of system roads and trails that
provide public access to the Forest while minimizing resource impacts;
Manage forest stands to be more resilient to future
disturbances and improve terrestrial habitat for northern spotted owl
and Roosevelt elk;
Contribute to local and regional economies by providing
forest products and enhancing recreational opportunities; and
Improve the vigor and prevalence of Karuk cultural
resources that were historically present in the planning area.
Proposed Action
The proposed action was designed to meet the purpose and need of
the project. The proposed action would treat about 10,550 acres within
the 45,992-acre project boundary. Acres by treatment type are described
below and do not account for overlap in treatment types (acres
receiving multiple treatments may be double counted). Treatment
acreages are approximate at this point and may be adjusted and refined
following scoping. The proposed action also addresses the existing
condition of the National Forest Transportation System (Forest System)
by treating legacy sites, changing road maintenance levels, and
decommissioning roads. All treatments would manage for improving the
health and vigor of hardwood species according to the Klamath National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). Riparian
Reserves within and adjacent to treatment units would be evaluated on a
site-by-site basis for treatment, and would include equipment and
treatment exclusion zones.
This project would include the following eight types of vegetation
treatments: (1) Commercial thinning; (2) noncommercial thinning; (3)
hardwood enhancement; (4) meadow enhancement; (5) fuels reduction
adjacent to private property; (6) defensible fuel profile zones; (7)
roadside fuels reduction; and (8) underburning. This project would use
a travel analysis for recommending management levels of existing Forest
System roads and would develop new opportunities for recreation through
the addition of new trails.
(1) Commercial Thinning (1,782 acres): Commercial thinning is an
intermediate harvest with the objective of reducing stand density
primarily to improve growth, enhance forest health, and other resources
objectives. Treatment can recover potential mortality while producing
merchantable material.
(2) Noncommercial Thinning (1,256 acres): Noncommercial thinning is
an intermediate harvest which removes the less desirable trees of any
species in a stand of poles or larger trees primarily to improve the
composition and quality of the stand.
(3) Hardwood Enhancement (76 acres): Hardwood enhancement would
focus on stimulating the growth and available resources for preferred
hardwood species according to the Forest Plan.
(4) Meadow Enhancement (18 acres): Meadow enhancement treatments
would focus on reducing conifer encroachment by removing conifer
seedlings and saplings growing within the meadow footprint.
(5) Fuels reduction Adjacent to Private Property (153 acres): Fuel
breaks created to protect private property would extend up to 500 feet
adjacent to private property. The fuel treatments would involve cutting
and pile burning of ladder fuels: Brush, hardwoods, and conifer trees
up to ten inches diameter at breast height.
(6) Defensible Fuel Profile Zone (823 acres): The width of the
defensible fuel profile zone would be up to 250 feet on either side of
proposed ridge lines. The fuel treatments would involve cutting and
pile burning of ladder fuels: Brush, hardwoods, and conifer trees up to
ten inches diameter at breast height.
(7) Roadside Fuels Reduction (1,896 acres): The roadside fuel
breaks would extend up to 300 feet above and 50 feet below either side
of identified Forest System and county roads adjacent to Forest Service
lands. The fuel treatments would involve cutting and pile burning of
ladder fuels: Brush, hardwoods, and conifer trees up to ten inches
diameter at breast height.
(8) Underburning (4,552 acres): Underburn units are intended to be
burned at low to moderate intensities to reduce fuel loadings and
reduce the risk of catastrophic fire. Travel Analysis--A risk and
benefit analysis was conducted for Forest System roads within the East
Fork Elk Creek and Lower Elk Creek 6th field watersheds. Road
treatments include 22 miles of decommissioning, 15 miles of downgrading
maintenance levels, 10 miles of upgrading maintenance levels, and
treating associated legacy sites. In addition to Forest System road
actions, four miles of non-system roads would be rehabilitated.
This project would also include recreation improvements, including
the construction of 4.3 miles of new multi-use trails and up to 13
miles of mountain bike trail.
[[Page 45798]]
Connected Actions
Access: Access for this project would be mainly accomplished by use
of roads on the National Forest Transportation System. About three
miles of temporary roads would be needed to facilitate commercial
thinning operations. Most of these temporary roads would occur on
existing roadbeds. However, several short new temporary spur roads
would also be constructed. Both new and existing temporary roads would
be hydrologically stabilized at the end of the project.
Landings: Existing landings would be used where possible. Landing
size would be appropriately sized for operational safety. Cable
landings would use roads where possible. Cable landings off the road
system and ground-based landings would average one acre in size but
would not exceed 1.5 acres in size. Both new and existing landings
would be hydrologically stabilized at the end of the project.
Responsible Official
Patricia A. Grantham, Klamath National Forest, Forest Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service is the lead agency for the project. Based on the
result of the NEPA analysis, the Klamath National Forest, Forest
Supervisor's Record of Decision regarding the Elk Creek Watershed
Project will recommend implementation of one of the following:
(1) The proposed action and mitigations necessary to minimize or
avoid adverse impacts;
(2) An alternative to the proposed action and mitigations necessary
to minimize or avoid adverse impacts; or
(3) The no-action alternative.
The Record of Decision will also document the consistency of the
proposed action or one of the alternatives with the Klamath National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the Environmental Impact Statement.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the Environmental Impact Statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-21005 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P