Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request; Termination of Single-Employer Plans, Missing Participants, 45912-45913 [2017-20927]
Download as PDF
45912
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
NRC-regulated hazard (radiological or
chemical).15
2. An NRC-ordered safety-related or
security-related immediate remedial action.
C. Events Involving the Medical Use of
Radioactive Materials in Patients or Human
Research Subjects.16
1. A medical event, as defined in § 35.3045,
which results in a dose that:
(a) Is equal to or greater than 1 gray (Gy)
(100 rad) to a major portion of the bone
marrow or to the lens of the eye; or equal to
or greater than 2.5 Gy (250 rad) to the gonads;
or
(b) Exceeds, by 10 Gy (1,000 rad), the
expected dose to any other organ or tissue
from the administration defined in the
written directive; and
2. A medical event, as defined in § 35.3045,
which involves:
(a) A dose or dosage that is at least 50
percent greater than that prescribed, or
(b) A prescribed dose or dosage that:
(i) Uses the wrong radiopharmaceutical or
unsealed byproduct material; or
(ii) Is delivered by the wrong route of
administration; or
(iii) Is delivered to the wrong treatment
site; or
(iv) Is delivered by the wrong treatment
mode; or
(v) Is from a leaking source or sources; or
(vi) Is delivered to the wrong individual or
human research subject.
Appendix B: Other Events of Interest
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
This appendix discusses other events of
interest that do not meet the criteria for
abnormal occurrences (AOs) in Appendix A
to this policy statement. The Commission
may determine that events other than AOs
may be of interest to Congress and the public
and should be included in an appendix to the
AO report as ‘‘Other Events of Interest.’’ Such
events may include, but are not necessarily
limited to, events that do not meet the AO
15 High-consequence events for facilities licensed
under 10 CFR part 70, ‘‘Domestic licensing of
special nuclear material,’’ are those that could
seriously harm the worker or a member of the
public in accordance with § 70.61, ‘‘Performance
requirements.’’ The integrated safety analysis
conducted and maintained by the licensee or
applicant of 10 CFR part 70 fuel cycle facilities
identifies such hazards and the safety controls
(§ 70.62(c)) applied to meet the performance
requirements in accordance with § 70.61(b) through
(d).
Fuel cycle facilities licensed under 10 CFR part
40, ‘‘Domestic licensing of source material,’’ or
certified under 10 CFR part 76, ‘‘Certification of
gaseous diffusion plants,’’ have licensing basis
documents that describe facility specific hazards,
consequences, and those controls used to prevent
or mitigate the consequences of such accidents. For
these facilities, a high-consequence event would be
a release that has the potential to cause acute
radiological or chemical exposures to a worker or
a member of the public similar to that defined in
Appendix A to Chapter 3, Section A.2, of NUREG
1520, Revision 2, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for Fuel
Cycle Facilities License Applications—Final
Report,’’ issued June 2015, under ‘‘Consequence
Category 3 (High Consequences)’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15176A258).
16 Criteria III.A.2, III.A.3, and III.A.4 also apply to
medical licensees.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
criteria but that have been perceived by
Congress or the public to be of high health
or safety significance, have received
significant media coverage, or have caused
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to
increase its attention to or oversight of a
program area, or a group of similar events
that have resulted in licensed materials
entering the public domain in an
uncontrolled manner.
[FR Doc. 2017–21043 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information
Collection for OMB Review; Comment
Request; Termination of SingleEmployer Plans, Missing Participants
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to request
extension of OMB approval.
AGENCY:
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (‘‘PBGC’’) intends to
request that the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) extend approval
(with modifications), under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, of a
collection of information in its
regulations on Termination of SingleEmployer Plans and Missing
Participants, and implementing forms
and instructions. This notice informs
the public of PBGC’s intent and solicits
public comment on the collection of
information.
SUMMARY:
Comments should be submitted
by December 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web
site instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: paperwork.comments@
pbgc.gov.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of
General Counsel, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026.
PBGC will make all comments
available on its Web site at
www.pbgc.gov.
Copies of the collection of
information may be obtained without
charge by writing to the Disclosure
Division of the Office of the General
Counsel of PBGC at the above address
or by visiting that office or calling 202–
326–4040 during normal business
hours. (TTY and TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
202–326–4040.) The regulations and
forms and instructions relating to this
collection of information are available
on PBGC’s Web site at www.pbgc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo
Amato Burns (burns.jo.amato@
pbgc.gov), Regulatory Affairs Division,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026, 202 326–4400, ext. 3072, or Daniel
S. Liebman (daniel.liebman@pbgc.gov),
Acting Assistant General Counsel, same
address and phone number, ext. 6510.
TTY and TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 4041 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended, a single-employer pension
plan may terminate voluntarily only if
it satisfies the requirements for either a
standard or a distress termination.
Pursuant to ERISA section 4041(b), for
standard terminations, and section
4041(c), for distress terminations, and
PBGC’s termination regulation (29 CFR
part 4041), a plan administrator wishing
to terminate a plan is required to submit
specified information to PBGC in
support of the proposed termination and
to provide specified information
regarding the proposed termination to
third parties (participants, beneficiaries,
alternate payees, and employee
organizations). In the case of a plan with
participants or beneficiaries who cannot
be located when their benefits are to be
distributed, the plan administrator is
subject to the requirements of ERISA
section 4050 and PBGC’s regulation on
missing participants (29 CFR part 4050).
These regulations may be found on
PBGC’s Web site at https://
www.pbgc.gov/res/laws-andregulations/code-of-federalregulations.html.
The collection of information under
these regulations and the implementing
forms and instructions has been
approved by OMB under control
number 1212–0036 (expires November
30, 2017). PBGC is requesting that OMB
extend its approval for three years, with
modifications. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
PBGC is proposing to provide that the
plan administrator of a plan terminating
in a standard termination, or a distress
termination that closes out in the
private sector, may submit termination
forms electronically (scanned and
emailed or faxed), rather than by mail or
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 189 / Monday, October 2, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
personal delivery only. PBGC is
proposing this new submission
provision to increase the ease of
submission for plan administrators.
In addition, PBGC is proposing to
include an opportunity for plan
sponsors to contact PBGC for a pre-filing
consultation to discuss the filing
process and ensure the filing of a
distress termination is appropriate given
the sponsor’s specific circumstances.
This consultation will assist PBGC and
the plan sponsor in exploring whether
a waiver of one or more filing
obligations is appropriate, identifying
potential issues preventing a distress
termination of a particular plan, and
may indicate that commencement of an
agency-initiated termination of the
pension plan is warranted. This
consultation will be voluntary and will
result in little or no added burden on
the plan sponsor.
PBGC estimates that 1,276 plan
administrators will be subject to the
collection of information requirements
in PBGC’s regulations on termination
and missing participants and
implementing forms and instructions
each year, and that the total annual
burden of complying with these
requirements will be 1,560 hours and
$1,350,400.
PBGC is soliciting public comments
to—
• Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Issued in Washington, DC, by
Stephanie Cibinic,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel for
Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017–20927 Filed 9–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Sep 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[MC2017–207 and CP2017–315; MC2017–
208 and CP2017–316; MC2017–209 and
CP2017–317; MC2017–210 and CP2017–318;
MC2017–211 and CP2017–319; MC2017–212
and CP2017–320]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
a negotiated service agreement. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 4,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s Web site (https://
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45913
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.40.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: MC2017–207 and
CP2017–315; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 361 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: September 26, 2017; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq.; Public Representative:
Christopher C. Mohr; Comments Due:
October 4, 2017.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2017–208 and
CP2017–316; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 362 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: September 26, 2017; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq.; Public Representative:
Christopher C. Mohr; Comments Due:
October 4, 2017.
3. Docket No(s).: MC2017–209 and
CP2017–317; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 363 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted
Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data; Filing Acceptance
Date: September 26, 2017; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq.; Public Representative:
Katalin K. Clendenin; Comments Due:
October 4, 2017.
4. Docket No(s).: MC2017–210 and
CP2017–318; Filing Title: Request of the
United States Postal Service to Add
Priority Mail Contract 364 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45912-45913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20927]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Termination of Single-Employer Plans, Missing
Participants
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to request extension of OMB approval.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (``PBGC'') intends to
request that the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') extend
approval (with modifications), under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, of a collection of information in its regulations on Termination
of Single-Employer Plans and Missing Participants, and implementing
forms and instructions. This notice informs the public of PBGC's intent
and solicits public comment on the collection of information.
DATES: Comments should be submitted by December 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the Web site instructions for submitting comments.
Email: paperwork.comments@pbgc.gov.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-
4026.
PBGC will make all comments available on its Web site at
www.pbgc.gov.
Copies of the collection of information may be obtained without
charge by writing to the Disclosure Division of the Office of the
General Counsel of PBGC at the above address or by visiting that office
or calling 202-326-4040 during normal business hours. (TTY and TDD
users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339
and ask to be connected to 202-326-4040.) The regulations and forms and
instructions relating to this collection of information are available
on PBGC's Web site at www.pbgc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo Amato Burns
(burns.jo.amato@pbgc.gov), Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of the
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026, 202 326-4400, ext. 3072, or Daniel S.
Liebman (daniel.liebman@pbgc.gov), Acting Assistant General Counsel,
same address and phone number, ext. 6510. TTY and TDD users may call
the Federal relay service toll-free at 800-877-8339 and ask to be
connected to 202-326-4400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 4041 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, a single-employer
pension plan may terminate voluntarily only if it satisfies the
requirements for either a standard or a distress termination. Pursuant
to ERISA section 4041(b), for standard terminations, and section
4041(c), for distress terminations, and PBGC's termination regulation
(29 CFR part 4041), a plan administrator wishing to terminate a plan is
required to submit specified information to PBGC in support of the
proposed termination and to provide specified information regarding the
proposed termination to third parties (participants, beneficiaries,
alternate payees, and employee organizations). In the case of a plan
with participants or beneficiaries who cannot be located when their
benefits are to be distributed, the plan administrator is subject to
the requirements of ERISA section 4050 and PBGC's regulation on missing
participants (29 CFR part 4050). These regulations may be found on
PBGC's Web site at https://www.pbgc.gov/res/laws-and-regulations/code-of-federal-regulations.html.
The collection of information under these regulations and the
implementing forms and instructions has been approved by OMB under
control number 1212-0036 (expires November 30, 2017). PBGC is
requesting that OMB extend its approval for three years, with
modifications. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
PBGC is proposing to provide that the plan administrator of a plan
terminating in a standard termination, or a distress termination that
closes out in the private sector, may submit termination forms
electronically (scanned and emailed or faxed), rather than by mail or
[[Page 45913]]
personal delivery only. PBGC is proposing this new submission provision
to increase the ease of submission for plan administrators.
In addition, PBGC is proposing to include an opportunity for plan
sponsors to contact PBGC for a pre-filing consultation to discuss the
filing process and ensure the filing of a distress termination is
appropriate given the sponsor's specific circumstances. This
consultation will assist PBGC and the plan sponsor in exploring whether
a waiver of one or more filing obligations is appropriate, identifying
potential issues preventing a distress termination of a particular
plan, and may indicate that commencement of an agency-initiated
termination of the pension plan is warranted. This consultation will be
voluntary and will result in little or no added burden on the plan
sponsor.
PBGC estimates that 1,276 plan administrators will be subject to
the collection of information requirements in PBGC's regulations on
termination and missing participants and implementing forms and
instructions each year, and that the total annual burden of complying
with these requirements will be 1,560 hours and $1,350,400.
PBGC is soliciting public comments to--
Evaluate whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Issued in Washington, DC, by
Stephanie Cibinic,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2017-20927 Filed 9-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P