Challenge Competition: Improving Remote Monitoring of Pregnancy, 44818-44820 [2017-20539]
Download as PDF
44818
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2017 / Notices
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1159V
82. Sandra Blevins, New York, New
York
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1161V
83. Michele Harding on behalf of W. J.
H., Madison, Wisconsin
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1164V
84. Jody Larsen, Seattle, Washington
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1165V
85. Alexis Garner on behalf of K. T. G.,
Hyattsville, Maryland
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1166V
86. Elvira Cruz, Englewood, New Jersey
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1167V
87. Rasheedah Smith, Lawrenceville,
Georgia
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1169V
88. Carol Clark, Boston, Massachusetts
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1170V
89. Lesa Marie Bowman-Harris, Salem,
Oregon
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1172V
90. Jennifer Claypool, Dayton, Nevada
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1176V
91. Theresa Anderson, White Plains,
New York
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1178V
92. Maureen C. Clavio, Orland Park,
Illinois
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1179V
93. Ellen Honea, Beverly Hills,
California
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1180V
94. Jared Sipes, Jacksonville, North
Carolina
Court of Federal Claims No: 17–1181V
[FR Doc. 2017–20540 Filed 9–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Challenge Competition: Improving
Remote Monitoring of Pregnancy
Health Resources and Services
Administration, Department of Health
and Human Services.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Health Resources and
Services Administration’s (HRSA’s)
Maternal and Child Health Bureau
(MCHB) announces a prize competition
to support the development and testing
of low-cost, scalable technology-based
innovations to improve the ability of
prenatal care providers to monitor the
health and wellbeing of pregnant
women remotely, especially women
who live in rural and medicallyunderserved areas who have limited
access to on-site prenatal care.
The statutory authority for this
challenge competition is Section 105 of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Sep 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010.
This challenge, structured in three
phases, will reach a diverse population
of innovators and problem solvers
including families, coders, public health
experts, community leaders, individuals
affiliated with academic institutions,
research and development communities
in the private sector, and others.
All submissions will be evaluated;
separate prizes will be awarded for each
of the three phases below.
Phase 1: Design
Phase 2: Development and Small Scale
Testing
Phase 3: Scaling
Estimated dates for each phase are as
follows:
Phase 1: Effective on January 2, 2018
Phase 1 Submission Period Ends:
January 31, 2018, 11:59 p.m. ET
Phase 1 Judging Period: February 1–
February 28, 2018
Phase 1 Winners Announced: March 12,
2018
Phase 2 Begins: March 13, 2018
Phase 2 Submission Period Ends: July
11, 2018
Phase 2 Judging Period: July 12–August
12, 2018
Phase 2 Winners Announced: August
20, 2018
Phase 3 Begins: August 21, 2018
Phase 3 Submission Period Ends:
February 21, 2019
Phase 3 Winner Announced: March 1,
2019
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessie Buerlein, MSW, Office of Policy
and Planning, MCHB, JBuerlein@
hrsa.gov, (301) 443–8931, or James
Resnick, Office of the Associate
Administrator, MCHB, JResnick@
hrsa.gov, (301) 443–3222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 4, 2011, the America
COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010
was signed into law allowing the use of
challenges and prize competitions
increasing agencies’ ability to promote
and harness innovation. Competitions
run by the federal government result in
a number of benefits to the public,
including the following:
(a) Increasing the number and
diversity of the individuals, teams, and
organizations that are addressing a
particular problem or challenge of
national significance;
(b) Improving the skills of the
participants in the competition; and
(c) Directing attention to new market
opportunities and stimulating private
sector investment.
Subject of Challenge Competition
In recent years, technological
advances have improved the ability of
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
healthcare providers to monitor their
patients from afar. For example,
wearable biosensors provide for the
remote monitoring of patients, athletes,
premature infants, children, psychiatric
patients, people who need long-term
care, the elderly, and people in rural
and medically underserved areas.
Telemedicine is improving access for
patients, while smartphone apps are
improving patients’ ability for self-care.
At the same time, recent scientific
advances around developmental origins
of health and disease point to the
important role that environmental
exposures, nutrition, and stress play in
maternal health and fetal programming.
Remote, real-time, and more continuous
monitoring of harmful environmental
exposures, nutritional intake and energy
expenditure, and stress and sleep, along
with blood pressure, proteinuria, blood
glucose, and fetal heart rate, has the
potential to improve prenatal care
quality and pregnancy outcomes while
reducing healthcare costs.
Recent trends in hospital closures in
rural America also increase the need for
technological innovations that support
remote monitoring of pregnant women.
Between 2004 and 2014, 179 rural
counties (9 percent of all rural counties)
lost access to in-county hospital
obstetric services, and the percent of all
rural counties in the U.S. that lacked
hospital obstetric services increased
from 45 to 54 percent, due to hospital
and obstetric-unit closures.1 Many lowincome women, in both rural and urban
communities, do not access prenatal
care. Fully conflicting priorities such as
work, childcare, and transportation
make it difficult to make the
approximately 15 visits to their
provider’s office, which include critical
medical assessments and instructions
about self-care. This challenge is
designed to make technology work for
pregnant women, increase access,
improve communications (between
patients and providers and across
providers), and empower pregnant
women to take better care of themselves.
This challenge will support the
development and testing of low-cost,
scalable technology-based innovations
to improve the ability of prenatal care
providers to monitor the health and
wellbeing of pregnant women from afar
(e.g., in their homes); utilizing
technology to empower patients and
providers with more complete and upto-date information.
Key design features of the innovations
should include:
1 https://rhrc.umn.edu/wp-content/files_mf/
1491501904UMRHRCOBclosuresPolicyBrief.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2017 / Notices
• The innovation is low-cost to
families and scalable;
• The innovation is safe, accurate,
and effective;
• The innovation supports remote,
real-time, and more continuous
monitoring and early detection;
• The innovation improves
communication between patients and
providers;
• The innovation improves patientcenteredness of prenatal care;
• What gets monitored is grounded in
science (e.g., developmental origins of
health and disease); and
• The innovation empowers patients
to use their own health data to improve
behaviors.
Eligibility Rules for Participating in the
Competition
To be eligible to win a prize under
this challenge, an individual or entity—
(1) Shall have registered to participate
in the competition under the rules
promulgated by HRSA and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
(2) Shall have complied with all the
requirements under this section.
(3) In the case of a private entity, shall
be incorporated in and maintain a
primary place of business in the United
States, and in the case of an individual,
whether participating singly or in a
group, shall be a citizen or permanent
resident of the United States.
(4) May not be a federal entity or
federal employee acting within the
scope of their employment.
(5) Shall not be an HHS employee
working on their applications or
submissions during assigned duty
hours.
(6) May not be employees of HRSA or
any other company, organization, or
individual involved with the design,
production, execution, judging, or
distribution of the Challenge and their
immediate family (i.e., spouse, parents
and step-parents, siblings and stepsiblings, and children and stepchildren) and household members (i.e.,
people who share the same residence at
least 3 months out of the year).
(7) In the case of a federal grantee,
may not use federal funds to develop
COMPETES Act challenge applications
unless consistent with the purpose of
their grant award.
(8) In the case of a federal contractor,
may not use federal funds from a
contract to develop COMPETES Act
challenge applications or to fund efforts
in support of a COMPETES Act
challenge submission.
(9) Shall not be deemed ineligible
because the individual or entity used
federal facilities or consulted with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Sep 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
federal employees during a competition
if the facilities and employees are made
equitably available to all individuals
and entities participating in the
competition.
(10) Must agree to assume any and all
risks and waive claims against the
federal government and its related
entities, except in the case of willful
misconduct, for any injury, death,
damage, or loss of property, revenue, or
profits, whether direct, indirect, or
consequential, arising from the
participation in this prize contest,
whether the injury, death, damage, or
loss arises through negligence or
otherwise.
(11) Must also agree to indemnify the
federal government against third party
claims for damages arising from or
related to competition activities.
(12) Shall not be currently on the
Excluded Parties List (https://
www.epls.gov/).
Submission Requirements
The Challenge has three phases.
Phase 1—Design
The first stage of the prize
competition aims to attract a large set of
ideas and innovators. The target product
of the first stage will be the
conceptualization of the most promising
innovations to improve the ability of
prenatal care providers to monitor the
health and wellbeing of pregnant
women remotely, especially women
who live in rural and medically
underserved areas who have limited
access to on-site prenatal care.
The submissions should aim to
demonstrate that the proposed
intervention will be accessible across
diverse backgrounds and easily
implemented by users.
The Phase 1 Submission shall
include:
1. A comprehensive description of the
proposed intervention in five pages or
less, including:
a. A one-paragraph executive
summary that clearly states the question
to be solved;
b. Background information linking the
evidence to support the intervention;
c. A descriptive analysis of how the
applicant arrived at their idea;
d. Descriptions of the methods and
technologies involved in
implementation of the intervention; and
e. An assessment describing the
applicant’s ability to execute the
proposed solution in Phase 2 and 3.
Phase 2—Development and Small Scale
Testing
The winners of Phase 1 of the prize
competition will then advance to a
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44819
second stage focused on prototyping the
intervention, and testing the
effectiveness of the intervention. Using
support from the Phase 1 prize funding,
intervention developers will test the
efficacy of their models to show that the
proposed intervention demonstrates an
impact on the outcomes of interest for
providers and pregnant women. The
applicants should demonstrate both the
evidence base for the intervention and
its usability. Mentors will be available
to help participants design appropriate
testing methodologies and learn more
about the evidence base.
Phase 3—Scaling
The winners of Phase 2 will move to
the final phase of the incentive prize,
which will involve testing the most
promising models at greater scale
through rollout at the program or
community level. This will test the
scalability of the device at low-cost, the
feasibility of implementation, and the
impact on the intended outcomes.
Registration Process for Participants
Participants will be able to register
and submit an entry at the Improving
Remote Monitoring of Pregnancy
Challenge Web site. Participants can
find out more information at https://
www.challenge.gov/list/.
Prizes
• Total: $375,000 in Prizes
Æ Phase 1: 7–10 winners; up to a total
of $100,000 in prizes
Æ Phase 2: 3–5 winners; up to a total
of $125,000 in prizes
Æ Phase 3: 1 winner; up to a total of
$150,000 prize
Payment of the Prizes
Prize payments will be paid by a
contractor. Phase 1 winners may be
expected to use a portion of the prize
money for travel and lodging to attend
a 2-day meeting in Washington, DC, to
demonstrate their innovation to the
judges.
Prizes awarded under this
competition will be paid by electronic
funds transfer and may be subject to
Federal income taxes. HHS will comply
with the Internal Revenue Service
withholding and reporting
requirements, where applicable.
Basis for Winner Selection
A review panel composed of HHS
employees and experts will judge
challenge entries in compliance with
the requirements of the America
COMPETES Act and HHS judging
guidelines: https://www.hhs.gov/idealab/
wp-content/uploads/2014/04/HHSCOMPETITION-JUDGINGGUIDELINES.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
44820
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2017 / Notices
The review panel will make selections
based upon the following criteria:
Phase 1
Accessibility
• Is the proposed intervention easily
utilized by families of diverse economic,
social, and cultural backgrounds? Is it
functional across disciplines/users?
Measurability
• How easily will the proposed
intervention be evaluated in order to
determine its efficacy (in both lab
testing and in the real world)? Is the
proposed intervention measurable
among various audiences?
Sustainability
• Does the proposed intervention
compel users to utilize the technology
often and/or for long periods of time?
Does it fit into daily life? Is it fun to use?
Impact
• Does the applicant present a theory
or explanation of how the proposed
intervention would result in concrete
change?
Phase 2
Impact
• How did the intervention impact
outcomes for providers and patients?
What did data show?
Evidence Base
• Is the intervention grounded in
existing science related to improving
health care and related services for
pregnant women?
Sustainability
• Was the intervention compelling to
users and did it encourage users to use
the technology often? Did users want to
continuously engage with the
technology?
Implementation
• How feasible is the intervention?
How much support for implementation
will the intervention require (estimated
financial and time commitment)?
Phase 3
Impact
• How effective was the intervention
when implemented at scale? Did the
impacts on users from Phase 2 remain
consistent?
Scalability
• How costly was the intervention in
a real-world setting? How likely are cost
efficiencies for program delivery at
greater scale? Can the technology be
used in existing platforms?
Additional Information
General Conditions:
• HRSA reserves the right to cancel,
suspend, and/or modify the contest, or
any part of it, for any reason, at HRSA’s
sole discretion.
• The interventions submitted across
all phases should not use the HHS or
HRSA logos or official seals in the
submission, and must not claim
endorsement.
Intellectual Property
• Each entrant retains full ownership
and title in and to their submission.
Entrants expressly reserve all
intellectual property rights not
expressly granted under the challenge
agreement.
• By participating in the challenge,
each entrant hereby irrevocably grants
to HRSA a limited, non-exclusive,
royalty-free, worldwide license and
right to reproduce, publically perform,
publically display, and use the
submission for internal HHS business
and to the extent necessary to
administer the challenge, and to
publically perform and publically
display the submission, including,
without limitation, for advertising and
promotional purposes relating to the
challenge.
• Record Retention and FOIA: All
materials submitted to HRSA as part of
a submission become HRSA records and
cannot be returned. Any confidential
commercial information contained in a
submission should be designated at the
time of submission. Participants will be
notified of any Freedom of Information
Act requests for their submissions in
accordance with 45 CFR 5.65.
Dated: September 19, 2017.
George Sigounas,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–20539 Filed 9–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
Implementation
• How feasible was the intervention
on a larger scale? How much support for
implementation did the model require
(financial and time commitment)? How
challenging was the actual program
implementation?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:28 Sep 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Notice of Non-Competitive,
Supplemental Funding Award for Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program, Special
Projects of National Significance
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This non-competitive award
will provide Secretary’s Minority AIDS
Initiative Fund (SMAIF) supplemental
funding to the Jurisdictional Approach
to Curing Hepatitis C among HIV/HCV
Coinfected People of Color—Evaluation
and Technical Assistance Center
(ETAC), RAND Corporation. This
supplemental funding will allow RAND
Corporation to provide evaluation and
technical assistance to cooperative
agreement recipients and subrecipient
clinical sites under HRSA–17–047
Curing Hepatitis C among People of
Color Living with HIV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intended Recipient of the Award:
RAND Corporation (U90HA30519).
Amount of Non-Competitive Award:
Up to $250,000 per year for 3 years
(pending availability of future year
funding).
Period of Funding: September 30,
2017, through September 29, 2020.
CFDA Number: No. 93.928.
Authority: The Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2017 (Pub. L. 115–
31), Division H, Title II.
Justification: In fiscal year (FY) 2016,
the SMAIF Curing Hepatitis C among
People of Color Living with HIV
initiative was launched through three
funding opportunities: (1) Jurisdictional
Approach to Curing Hepatitis C among
HIV/HCV Co-infected People of Color—
Jurisdictional Sites (HRSA–16–189) and
(2) Jurisdictional Approach to Curing
Hepatitis C among HIV/HCV Coinfected
People of Color—State Health
Departments Coordinating Center
(HRSA–16–195) to provide HIV primary
medical care to low income, uninsured,
and underserved people living with
both HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV);
and (3) Jurisdictional Approach to
Curing Hepatitis C among HIV/HCV
Coinfected People of Color—ETAC
(HRSA–16–188) to provide evaluation
and technical assistance to the funded
sites. In FY17, HRSA–17–047 was
announced to improve HCV prevention
and care; improve coordination to
linkage and retention in care; and
enhance capacity of health department
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44818-44820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20539]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Challenge Competition: Improving Remote Monitoring of Pregnancy
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of
Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA's)
Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) announces a prize competition
to support the development and testing of low-cost, scalable
technology-based innovations to improve the ability of prenatal care
providers to monitor the health and wellbeing of pregnant women
remotely, especially women who live in rural and medically-underserved
areas who have limited access to on-site prenatal care.
The statutory authority for this challenge competition is Section
105 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010.
This challenge, structured in three phases, will reach a diverse
population of innovators and problem solvers including families,
coders, public health experts, community leaders, individuals
affiliated with academic institutions, research and development
communities in the private sector, and others.
All submissions will be evaluated; separate prizes will be awarded
for each of the three phases below.
Phase 1: Design
Phase 2: Development and Small Scale Testing
Phase 3: Scaling
Estimated dates for each phase are as follows:
Phase 1: Effective on January 2, 2018
Phase 1 Submission Period Ends: January 31, 2018, 11:59 p.m. ET
Phase 1 Judging Period: February 1-February 28, 2018
Phase 1 Winners Announced: March 12, 2018
Phase 2 Begins: March 13, 2018
Phase 2 Submission Period Ends: July 11, 2018
Phase 2 Judging Period: July 12-August 12, 2018
Phase 2 Winners Announced: August 20, 2018
Phase 3 Begins: August 21, 2018
Phase 3 Submission Period Ends: February 21, 2019
Phase 3 Winner Announced: March 1, 2019
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessie Buerlein, MSW, Office of Policy
and Planning, MCHB, JBuerlein@hrsa.gov, (301) 443-8931, or James
Resnick, Office of the Associate Administrator, MCHB,
JResnick@hrsa.gov, (301) 443-3222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 4, 2011, the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 was signed into law allowing the use of
challenges and prize competitions increasing agencies' ability to
promote and harness innovation. Competitions run by the federal
government result in a number of benefits to the public, including the
following:
(a) Increasing the number and diversity of the individuals, teams,
and organizations that are addressing a particular problem or challenge
of national significance;
(b) Improving the skills of the participants in the competition;
and
(c) Directing attention to new market opportunities and stimulating
private sector investment.
Subject of Challenge Competition
In recent years, technological advances have improved the ability
of healthcare providers to monitor their patients from afar. For
example, wearable biosensors provide for the remote monitoring of
patients, athletes, premature infants, children, psychiatric patients,
people who need long-term care, the elderly, and people in rural and
medically underserved areas. Telemedicine is improving access for
patients, while smartphone apps are improving patients' ability for
self-care.
At the same time, recent scientific advances around developmental
origins of health and disease point to the important role that
environmental exposures, nutrition, and stress play in maternal health
and fetal programming. Remote, real-time, and more continuous
monitoring of harmful environmental exposures, nutritional intake and
energy expenditure, and stress and sleep, along with blood pressure,
proteinuria, blood glucose, and fetal heart rate, has the potential to
improve prenatal care quality and pregnancy outcomes while reducing
healthcare costs.
Recent trends in hospital closures in rural America also increase
the need for technological innovations that support remote monitoring
of pregnant women. Between 2004 and 2014, 179 rural counties (9 percent
of all rural counties) lost access to in-county hospital obstetric
services, and the percent of all rural counties in the U.S. that lacked
hospital obstetric services increased from 45 to 54 percent, due to
hospital and obstetric-unit closures.\1\ Many low-income women, in both
rural and urban communities, do not access prenatal care. Fully
conflicting priorities such as work, childcare, and transportation make
it difficult to make the approximately 15 visits to their provider's
office, which include critical medical assessments and instructions
about self-care. This challenge is designed to make technology work for
pregnant women, increase access, improve communications (between
patients and providers and across providers), and empower pregnant
women to take better care of themselves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://rhrc.umn.edu/wp-content/files_mf/1491501904UMRHRCOBclosuresPolicyBrief.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This challenge will support the development and testing of low-
cost, scalable technology-based innovations to improve the ability of
prenatal care providers to monitor the health and wellbeing of pregnant
women from afar (e.g., in their homes); utilizing technology to empower
patients and providers with more complete and up-to-date information.
Key design features of the innovations should include:
[[Page 44819]]
The innovation is low-cost to families and scalable;
The innovation is safe, accurate, and effective;
The innovation supports remote, real-time, and more
continuous monitoring and early detection;
The innovation improves communication between patients and
providers;
The innovation improves patient-centeredness of prenatal
care;
What gets monitored is grounded in science (e.g.,
developmental origins of health and disease); and
The innovation empowers patients to use their own health
data to improve behaviors.
Eligibility Rules for Participating in the Competition
To be eligible to win a prize under this challenge, an individual
or entity--
(1) Shall have registered to participate in the competition under
the rules promulgated by HRSA and the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS).
(2) Shall have complied with all the requirements under this
section.
(3) In the case of a private entity, shall be incorporated in and
maintain a primary place of business in the United States, and in the
case of an individual, whether participating singly or in a group,
shall be a citizen or permanent resident of the United States.
(4) May not be a federal entity or federal employee acting within
the scope of their employment.
(5) Shall not be an HHS employee working on their applications or
submissions during assigned duty hours.
(6) May not be employees of HRSA or any other company,
organization, or individual involved with the design, production,
execution, judging, or distribution of the Challenge and their
immediate family (i.e., spouse, parents and step-parents, siblings and
step-siblings, and children and step-children) and household members
(i.e., people who share the same residence at least 3 months out of the
year).
(7) In the case of a federal grantee, may not use federal funds to
develop COMPETES Act challenge applications unless consistent with the
purpose of their grant award.
(8) In the case of a federal contractor, may not use federal funds
from a contract to develop COMPETES Act challenge applications or to
fund efforts in support of a COMPETES Act challenge submission.
(9) Shall not be deemed ineligible because the individual or entity
used federal facilities or consulted with federal employees during a
competition if the facilities and employees are made equitably
available to all individuals and entities participating in the
competition.
(10) Must agree to assume any and all risks and waive claims
against the federal government and its related entities, except in the
case of willful misconduct, for any injury, death, damage, or loss of
property, revenue, or profits, whether direct, indirect, or
consequential, arising from the participation in this prize contest,
whether the injury, death, damage, or loss arises through negligence or
otherwise.
(11) Must also agree to indemnify the federal government against
third party claims for damages arising from or related to competition
activities.
(12) Shall not be currently on the Excluded Parties List (https://www.epls.gov/).
Submission Requirements
The Challenge has three phases.
Phase 1--Design
The first stage of the prize competition aims to attract a large
set of ideas and innovators. The target product of the first stage will
be the conceptualization of the most promising innovations to improve
the ability of prenatal care providers to monitor the health and
wellbeing of pregnant women remotely, especially women who live in
rural and medically underserved areas who have limited access to on-
site prenatal care.
The submissions should aim to demonstrate that the proposed
intervention will be accessible across diverse backgrounds and easily
implemented by users.
The Phase 1 Submission shall include:
1. A comprehensive description of the proposed intervention in five
pages or less, including:
a. A one-paragraph executive summary that clearly states the
question to be solved;
b. Background information linking the evidence to support the
intervention;
c. A descriptive analysis of how the applicant arrived at their
idea;
d. Descriptions of the methods and technologies involved in
implementation of the intervention; and
e. An assessment describing the applicant's ability to execute the
proposed solution in Phase 2 and 3.
Phase 2--Development and Small Scale Testing
The winners of Phase 1 of the prize competition will then advance
to a second stage focused on prototyping the intervention, and testing
the effectiveness of the intervention. Using support from the Phase 1
prize funding, intervention developers will test the efficacy of their
models to show that the proposed intervention demonstrates an impact on
the outcomes of interest for providers and pregnant women. The
applicants should demonstrate both the evidence base for the
intervention and its usability. Mentors will be available to help
participants design appropriate testing methodologies and learn more
about the evidence base.
Phase 3--Scaling
The winners of Phase 2 will move to the final phase of the
incentive prize, which will involve testing the most promising models
at greater scale through rollout at the program or community level.
This will test the scalability of the device at low-cost, the
feasibility of implementation, and the impact on the intended outcomes.
Registration Process for Participants
Participants will be able to register and submit an entry at the
Improving Remote Monitoring of Pregnancy Challenge Web site.
Participants can find out more information at https://www.challenge.gov/list/.
Prizes
Total: $375,000 in Prizes
[cir] Phase 1: 7-10 winners; up to a total of $100,000 in prizes
[cir] Phase 2: 3-5 winners; up to a total of $125,000 in prizes
[cir] Phase 3: 1 winner; up to a total of $150,000 prize
Payment of the Prizes
Prize payments will be paid by a contractor. Phase 1 winners may be
expected to use a portion of the prize money for travel and lodging to
attend a 2-day meeting in Washington, DC, to demonstrate their
innovation to the judges.
Prizes awarded under this competition will be paid by electronic
funds transfer and may be subject to Federal income taxes. HHS will
comply with the Internal Revenue Service withholding and reporting
requirements, where applicable.
Basis for Winner Selection
A review panel composed of HHS employees and experts will judge
challenge entries in compliance with the requirements of the America
COMPETES Act and HHS judging guidelines: https://www.hhs.gov/idealab/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/HHS-COMPETITION-JUDGING-GUIDELINES.pdf.
[[Page 44820]]
The review panel will make selections based upon the following
criteria:
Phase 1
Accessibility
Is the proposed intervention easily utilized by families
of diverse economic, social, and cultural backgrounds? Is it functional
across disciplines/users?
Measurability
How easily will the proposed intervention be evaluated in
order to determine its efficacy (in both lab testing and in the real
world)? Is the proposed intervention measurable among various
audiences?
Sustainability
Does the proposed intervention compel users to utilize the
technology often and/or for long periods of time? Does it fit into
daily life? Is it fun to use?
Impact
Does the applicant present a theory or explanation of how
the proposed intervention would result in concrete change?
Phase 2
Impact
How did the intervention impact outcomes for providers and
patients? What did data show?
Evidence Base
Is the intervention grounded in existing science related
to improving health care and related services for pregnant women?
Sustainability
Was the intervention compelling to users and did it
encourage users to use the technology often? Did users want to
continuously engage with the technology?
Implementation
How feasible is the intervention? How much support for
implementation will the intervention require (estimated financial and
time commitment)?
Phase 3
Impact
How effective was the intervention when implemented at
scale? Did the impacts on users from Phase 2 remain consistent?
Implementation
How feasible was the intervention on a larger scale? How
much support for implementation did the model require (financial and
time commitment)? How challenging was the actual program
implementation?
Scalability
How costly was the intervention in a real-world setting?
How likely are cost efficiencies for program delivery at greater scale?
Can the technology be used in existing platforms?
Additional Information
General Conditions:
HRSA reserves the right to cancel, suspend, and/or modify
the contest, or any part of it, for any reason, at HRSA's sole
discretion.
The interventions submitted across all phases should not
use the HHS or HRSA logos or official seals in the submission, and must
not claim endorsement.
Intellectual Property
Each entrant retains full ownership and title in and to
their submission. Entrants expressly reserve all intellectual property
rights not expressly granted under the challenge agreement.
By participating in the challenge, each entrant hereby
irrevocably grants to HRSA a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free,
worldwide license and right to reproduce, publically perform,
publically display, and use the submission for internal HHS business
and to the extent necessary to administer the challenge, and to
publically perform and publically display the submission, including,
without limitation, for advertising and promotional purposes relating
to the challenge.
Record Retention and FOIA: All materials submitted to HRSA
as part of a submission become HRSA records and cannot be returned. Any
confidential commercial information contained in a submission should be
designated at the time of submission. Participants will be notified of
any Freedom of Information Act requests for their submissions in
accordance with 45 CFR 5.65.
Dated: September 19, 2017.
George Sigounas,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-20539 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P