Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2018, 44615-44624 [2017-20436]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) and is
structured to provide scientific advice,
information and recommendations to
the EPA Administrator on pesticides
and pesticide-related issues as to the
impact of regulatory actions on health
and the environment. FIFRA SAP is a
Federal advisory committee established
in 1975 pursuant to FIFRA and operates
in accordance with requirements of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. Appendix). FIFRA SAP is
composed of a permanent panel
consisting of seven members who are
appointed by the EPA Administrator
from nominees provided by the National
Institutes of Health and the National
Science Foundation. The FIFRA SAP is
assisted in their reviews by ad hoc
participation from the Science Review
Board (SRB). As a scientific peer review
mechanism, FIFRA SAP provides
comments, evaluations, and
recommendations to improve the
effectiveness and quality of analyses
made by Agency scientists. The FIFRA
SAP strives to reach consensus
however, is not required to reach
consensus in its recommendations to
the Agency.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
B. Public Meeting
During the meeting scheduled for
October 2, 2017, the FIFRA SAP will
review and consider the Charge
Questions for the Panel’s October 24–27,
2017 Meeting on Physiologically Based
Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling. The
SAP will receive a short background
briefing including the EPA’s history and
current position on the use of PBPK
modeling. In addition, the panel
members will have the opportunity to
comment on the scope and clarity of the
draft charge questions. Subsequent to
this meeting, final charge questions will
be provided for the FIFRA SAP’s
deliberation on the white papers and
supplemental information during the inperson meeting to be held on October
24–27, 2017.
C. FIFRA SAP Documents and Meeting
Minutes
EPA’s background documents, charge
questions to the FIFRA SAP, and the
meeting agenda will be available before
or on September 13, 2017. In addition,
the Agency may provide additional
background documents as additional
materials become available. You may
obtain electronic copies of most meeting
documents, including FIFRA SAP
composition (i.e., members and ad hoc
members for this meeting) and the
meeting agenda, at https://
www.regulations.gov and the FIFRA
SAP Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
sap.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting
minutes approximately 90 calendar days
after the meeting. The meeting minutes
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/sap and may
be accessed in the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; 21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.
Dated: September 11, 2017.
Inza Graves,
Acting, Director, Office of Science
Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–20430 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9967–74–OLEM]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section
128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal
Response Programs for FY2018
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will accept requests, from
October 15, 2017 through December 15,
2017, for grants to establish and
enhance State and Tribal Response
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements of a response program and
establishing a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2018, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
available to provide technical assistance
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44615
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is applicable as of
October 15, 2017. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2018.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA
Regional Offices and EPA Headquarters
can be found at www.epa.gov/
brownfields and at the end of this
Notice. Funding requests may be
submitted electronically to the EPA
Regional Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency
Management, Office of Brownfields and
Land Revitalization, (202) 566–2745 or
the applicable EPA Regional Office
listed at the end this Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs. CERCLA
section 128(a) response program grants
are funded with categorical 3 State and
Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG)
appropriations. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the EPA regional
offices. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment,
cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with
actual or perceived contamination. This
document provides guidance that will
enable states and tribes to apply for and
use Fiscal Year 2018 section 128(a)
funds.4
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
in state and tribal Performance
Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part
35 Subparts A and B, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
1 The term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA section
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, November
4, 2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
section 128(a).
3 Categorical grants are issued by the U.S.
Congress to fund state and local governments for
narrowly defined purposes.
4 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
44616
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
environmental insurance or developing
a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool,
or insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
State or Tribal response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted
from October 15, 2017 through
December 15, 2017. Requests EPA
receives after December 15, 2017 will
not be considered for FY2018 funding.
Information that must be submitted with
the funding request is listed in Section
IX of this guidance. States or tribes that
do not submit the request in the
appropriate manner may forfeit their
ability to receive funds. First time
requestors are strongly encouraged to
contact their Regional EPA Brownfields
contacts, listed at the end of this
guidance, prior to submitting their
funding request. EPA will consider
funding requests up to a maximum of
$1.0 million per state or tribe for
FY2018.
Requests submitted by the December
15, 2017 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional offices
once final funding allocation
determinations are made. As in previous
years, EPA will place special emphasis
on reviewing a cooperative agreement
recipient’s use of prior section 128(a)
funding in making allocation decisions
and unexpended balances are subject to
40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the
extent consistent with this guidance.
Also, EPA will prioritize funding for
recipients establishing their response
programs.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement’s final package.
For more information, please go to
www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at brownfield sites across the
country. The depth and breadth of these
programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA
related activities, while others are multifaceted, addressing sites regulated by
both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Many states also offer accompanying
financial incentive programs to spur
cleanup and redevelopment. In enacting
CERCLA section 128(a),5 Congress
recognized the value of state and tribal
5 Section
128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfield sites. Section
128(a) strengthens EPA’s partnerships
with states and tribes, and recognizes
the response programs’ critical role in
overseeing cleanups.
This funding is intended for those
states and tribes that have the required
management and administrative
capacity within their government to
administer a federal grant. The primary
goal of this funding is to ensure that
state and tribal response programs
include, or are taking reasonable steps
to include, certain elements of an
environmental response program and
that the program establishes and
maintains a public record of sites
addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will provide
technical assistance to states and tribes
as they apply for and carry out section
128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
1. Demonstrate that its response
program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four
elements of a response program
described in Section V of this guidance;
or be a party to a voluntary response
program Memorandum of Agreement
(VRP MOA) 6 with EPA; AND
2. Maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned to
be addressed in the upcoming year (see
CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C)).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under section
128(a), with the exception of section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund (RLF), for which there is a 20%
cost share requirement. Section 128(a)
funds uses to capitalize a RLF must be
operated in accordance with CERCLA
section 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements—Section
128(a)(2)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described
below. Achievement of the four
6 States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs
and that maintain and make available a public
record are automatically eligible for section 128(a)
funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
elements should be viewed as a priority.
Section 128(a) authorizes funding for
activities necessary to establish and
enhance the four elements, and to
establish and maintain the public record
requirement.
The four elements of a response
program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfield sites in state or tribal land.
The goal for this element is to enable the
state or tribe to establish or enhance a
system or process that will provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely locations, and the general
characteristics of brownfields sites in
their state or tribal lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of
state and tribal response programs and
will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfield sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfield sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Inventories should evolve to a
prioritization of sites based on
community needs, planning priorities,
and protection of human health and the
environment. Inventories should be
developed in direct coordination with
communities, and particular attention
should focus on communities with
limited capacity to compete for and
manage a competitive brownfield
assessment, revolving loan, or cleanup
cooperative agreement.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. The goal for this element is
to have state and tribal response
programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources to ensure
that:
a. A response action will protect
human health and the environment, and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the
necessary response activities if the
person conducting the response fails to
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
complete them (this includes operation
and maintenance and/or long-term
monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.7 The goal for this
element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms and resources for
meaningful public participation, at the
local level, including, at a minimum:
a. Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is relying
on or developing to make cleanup
decisions or conduct site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful public comment on cleanup
plans and site activities, including the
input into the prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person
who is, or may be, affected by a release
or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant at
a brownfield site—located in the
community in which the person works
or resides—may request that a site
assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official must
consider this request and appropriately
respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of
cleanup plans, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
The goal for this element is to have
states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms to
approve cleanup plans and to verify that
response actions are complete,
including a requirement for certification
or similar documentation from the state,
the tribe, or a licensed site professional
that the response action is complete.
Written approval by a state or tribal
response program official of a proposed
cleanup plan is an example of an
approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, as described below, to enable
meaningful public participation (refer to
Section V.3 above). Specifically, under
section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a public record that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions have been completed during the
previous year;
7 States
and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-communityinvolvement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
2. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a public record that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions are planned in the next year;
and
3. Identify in the public record
whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will
be suitable for unrestricted use. If not,
the public record must identify the
institutional controls relied on in the
remedy and include relevant
information concerning the entity
responsible for oversight, monitoring,
and/or maintenance of the institutional
and engineering controls; and how the
responsible entity is implementing
those activities (see Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘Survey and
Inventory’’ Element From the ‘‘Public
Record’’
It is important to note that the public
record requirement differs from the
‘‘timely survey and inventory’’ element
described in the ‘‘Four Elements’’
section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year or are planned in the
upcoming year. In contrast, the ‘‘timely
survey and inventory’’ element,
described above, refers to identifying
brownfield sites regardless of planned
or completed actions.
B. Making the Public Record Easily
Accessible
EPA’s goal is to enable states and
tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use section 128(a) funding to make
such information available to the public
via the internet or other avenues. For
example, the Agency would support
funding state and tribal efforts to
include detailed location information in
the public record such as the street
address, and latitude and longitude
information for each site.8 States and
tribes should ensure that all affected
communities have appropriate access to
the public record by making it available
8 For further information on data quality
requirements for latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA’s data standards Web
site available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/
production/files/2015-06/documents/
latlongstandard-v2a_10022014.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44617
on-line, in print at libraries, or at other
community gathering places.
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public
Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to
maintain public record information,
including data on institutional controls,
on a long-term basis (more than one
year) for sites at which a response action
has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes
may include development and operation
of systems that ensure long-term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls (such as ensuring the entity
responsible for oversight, monitoring,
and/or maintenance of the institutional
and engineering controls is
implementing those activities) in their
work plans.9
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use funding to
‘‘establish or enhance’’ its response
program. Specifically, a state or tribe
may use cooperative agreement funds to
build response programs that include
the four elements outline in section
128(a)(2). Eligible activities include, but
are not limited to, the following:
• Developing legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
that establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of a
response program;
• Establishing and maintaining the
required public record described in
Section VI of this guidance;
• Operation, maintenance and longterm monitoring of institutional controls
and engineering controls;
• Conducting site-specific activities,
such as assessment or cleanup, provided
such activities establish and/or enhance
the response program and are tied to the
9 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA’s institutional
controls Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/
policy/ic/index.htm.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
44618
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed-especially from local
communities with health risks related to
exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, those in
economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and those with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfield sites; site-specific
activities must be part of an overall
section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish
or enhance the four elements;
• Capitalizing a revolving loan fund
(RLF) for brownfields cleanup as
authorized under CERCLA section
104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the
same statutory requirements and
cooperative agreement terms and
conditions applicable to RLFs awarded
under section 104(k)(3). Requirements
include a 20 percent match (in the form
of money, labor, material, or services
from a non-federal source) on the
amount of section 128(a) funds used for
the RLF, a prohibition on using EPA
cooperative agreement funds for
administrative costs relating to the RLF,
and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for
which the recipient may be potentially
liable under section 107 of CERCLA.
Other prohibitions relevant to CERCLA
section 104(k)(4) also apply; and
• Purchasing environmental
insurance or developing a risk-sharing
pool, indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal
response program.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
B. Uses Related to Establishing a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
establish includes activities necessary to
build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, guidance, and a
public record.
States and tribes also need to comply
with Grants Policy Issuance (GPI) 17–01
Sustainability in EPA Cooperative
Agreements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
C. Uses Related to Enhancing a State or
Tribal Response Program
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
enhancing a state or tribal response
program includes related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under such
programs.
The exact enhancement activities that
may be allowable depend upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, (e.g., RCRA or
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)). As
another example, states and tribal
response program enhancement
activities can also include outreach to
local communities to increase
awareness about brownfields, building a
sustainable brownfields program,
federal brownfields technical assistance
opportunities 10 (e.g., holding
workshops to assist communities to
apply for federal Brownfields grant
funding), and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and institutional controls. Additionally,
enhancement activities can include
facilitating the participation of the state
and local agencies (e.g., transportation,
water, other infrastructure) in
implementation of brownfields projects.
States and tribes can also help local
communities collaborate with local
workforce development entities or
Brownfields Environmental Workforce
Development Job training recipients on
the assessment and cleanup of
brownfield sites.11 States and tribes also
need to comply with Grants Policy
Issuance (GPI) 17–01 Sustainability in
EPA Cooperative Agreements. Other
enhancement uses may be allowable as
well.
1. Eligible Uses of Funds for SiteSpecific Activities
10 EPA expects states and tribes will familiarize
themselves with US EPA’s brownfields technical
assistance opportunities for brownfields
communities. For more information on technical
assistance opportunities, please visit: https://
www.epa.gov/brownfields.
11 For more information about EPA’s Brownfields
Environmental Workforce Development and Job
Training Program, please visit: https://
www.epa.gov/brownfields/types-brownfields-grantfunding.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. Site-specific
assessments and cleanups can be both
eligible and allowable if the activities
are included in the work plan
negotiated between the EPA regional
office and the state or tribe, but
activities must comply with all
applicable laws and are subject to the
following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be
used for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a brownfields
site at CERCLA section 101(39). EPA
encourages states and tribes to use sitespecific funding to perform assessment
(e.g., phase I, phase II, supplemental
assessments and cleanup planning) and
cleanup activities that will expedite the
reuse and redevelopment of sites, and
prioritize sites based on need.12
Furthermore, states and tribes that
perform site-specific activities should
plan to directly engage with and involve
affected communities. For example, a
Community Relations Plan (CRP) could
be developed to provide reasonable
notice about a planned cleanup, as well
as opportunities for the public to
comment on the cleanup. States and
tribes should work towards securing
additional funding for site-specific
activities by leveraging resources from
other sources such as businesses, nonprofit organizations, education and
training providers, and/or federal, state,
tribal, and local governments;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site assessment can be
funded with section 128(a) funds, and
no more than $200,000 per site cleanup
can be funded with section 128(a)
funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/
tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and/or clean-up
sites owned or operated by the recipient
12 An example of prioritizing sites based on need
can be focusing on environmental justice. EPA
defines environmental justice as the fair treatment
and meaningful involvement of all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, or income
with respect to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. EPA has this goal for all
communities and persons across the nation.
Environmental justice will be achieved when
everyone enjoys the same degree of protection from
environmental and health hazards and equal access
to the decision-making process to have a healthy
environment in which to live, learn, and work. For
more information, please visit www.epa.gov/
environmentaljustice.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
or held in trust by the United States
Government for the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot
be conducted at sites where the state/
tribe is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA section 107,
except:
• At brownfield sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
• When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser, or would satisfy
all elements 101(40), except where the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
Subawards are defined at 2 CFR
200.92 and may not be awarded to forprofit organizations. If the recipient
plans on making any subawards under
the cooperative agreement, then they
become a pass-through entity. As the
pass-through entity, the recipient must
report on its subaward monitoring
activities under 2 CFR 200.331(d).
Additional reporting requirements for
these activities will be included in the
cooperative agreement. In addition,
subawards cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser, or would satisfy
all elements of CERCLA 101(40)(D)
except where the date of acquisition of
the property was on or before January
11, 2002.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
2. Limitations on the Amount of Funds
Used for Site-Specific Activities and
Waiver Process
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for site-specific activities
that improve state or tribal capacity.
However, the amount recipients may
request for site-specific assessments and
cleanups may not exceed 50% of the
total amount of funding.13 In order to
exceed the 50% site-specific funding
limit, a state or tribe must submit a
waiver request. The total amount of the
site-specific request may not exceed the
recipient’s total funding level for the
previous year. The funding request must
include a brief justification describing
13 Oversight of assessment and cleanup activities
performed by responsible parties (other than the
state or tribe) does not count toward the 50% limit.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
the reason(s) for spending more than
50% of an annual allocation on sitespecific activities. An applicant, when
requesting a waiver, must include the
following information in the written
justification:
• Total amount requested for sitespecific activities;
• Percentage of the site-specific
activities (assuming waiver is approved)
in the total budget;
• Site-specific activities that will be
covered by this funding. If known,
provide site specific information and
describe how work on each site
contributes to the development or
enhancement of your state/tribal site
response program. Explain how the
community will be (or has been)
involved in prioritization of site work
and especially those sites where there is
a potential or known significant
environmental impact to the
community;
• An explanation of how this shift in
funding will not negatively impact the
core programmatic capacity (i.e., the
ability to establish/enhance the four
required elements of a response
program) and how the core program
activities will be maintained in spite of
an increase in site-specific work.
Recipients must demonstrate that they
have adequate funding from other
sources to effectively carry out work on
the four elements for EPA to grant a
waiver of the 50% limit on using 128(a)
funds for site-specific activities; and
• An explanation as to whether the
sites to be addressed are those for which
the affected community(ies) has
requested work be conducted (refer to
Section VII.A Overview of Funding for
more information).
EPA Headquarters will review waiver
requests based on the information in the
justification and other information
available to the Agency. EPA will
inform recipients whether the waiver is
approved.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfield Sites
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance response programs
addressing petroleum brownfield sites.
Subject to the restrictions listed above
(see Section VII.D.1) for all site-specific
activities, the costs of site-specific
assessments and cleanup activities at
petroleum contaminated brownfield
sites, as defined in CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are both eligible and
allowable if the activity is included in
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44619
used at brownfield sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Additional Examples of Eligible SiteSpecific Activities
Other eligible uses of funds for sitespecific related include, but are not
limited to, the following activities:
• Technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
• Development and/or review of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs);
and
• Entering data into the Assessment
Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange
System (ACRES) database
E. Uses Related to Activities at ‘‘NonBrownfield’’ Sites
Other uses not specifically referenced
in this guidance may also be eligible
and allowable. Recipients should
consult with their regional state or tribal
contact for additional guidance. Costs
incurred for activities at non-brownfield
sites may be eligible and allowable if
such activities are included in the
state’s or tribe’s work plan. Direct
assessment and cleanup activities may
only be conducted on eligible
brownfield sites, as defined in CERCLA
section 101(39).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines
for 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 14 between EPA
and a state or a tribe. The program
administers cooperative agreements
under the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles and
Audit requirements for Federal Awards
regulations for all entity types including
states, tribes, and local governments
found in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 2 CFR part 200 and any
applicable EPA regulations in Title 2
CFR Subtitle B—Federal Agency
Regulations for Grants and Agreements
Chapter 15 as well as applicable
provisions of 40 CFR part 35 Subparts
A and B. Under these regulations, the
cooperative agreement recipient for a
section 128(a) grant is the government to
which a cooperative agreement is
awarded and which is accountable for
use of the funds provided. The
cooperative agreement recipient is the
legal entity even if only a particular
component of the entity is designated in
the cooperative agreement award
14 A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a
state/tribe that includes substantial involvement by
EPA on activities described in the work plan which
may include technical assistance, collaboration on
program priorities, etc.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
44620
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
document. Further, unexpended
balances of cooperative agreement funds
are subject to restrictions under 40 CFR
35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518. EPA
allocates funds to state and tribal
response programs consistent with 40
CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional offices will negotiate and
enter into section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Maximum Funding Request
For Fiscal Year 2018, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or
tribe. Please note that demand for this
program continues to increase. Due to
the increasing number of entities
requesting funding, it is likely that the
FY18 states and tribal individual
funding amounts will be less than the
FY17 individual funding amounts.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
C. Define the State or Tribal Response
Program
States and tribes must define in their
work plan the ‘‘section 128(a) response
program(s)’’ to which the funds will be
applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will
be EPA’s primary point of contact.
When EPA funds the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement, states and tribes
may distribute these funds among the
appropriate state and tribal agencies that
are part of the section 128(a) response
program. This distribution must be
clearly outlined in their annual work
plan.
D. Separate Cooperative Agreements for
the Capitalization of RLFs Using Section
128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant
funds requested will be used to
capitalize a revolving loan fund for
cleanup, pursuant to section 104(k)(3),
two separate cooperative agreements
must be awarded (i.e., one for the RLF
and one for non-RLF uses). States and
tribes must, however, submit one initial
request for funding, delineating the RLF
as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
E. Authority To Manage a Revolving
Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its
section 128(a) funds to capitalize a
revolving loan fund program, the state
or tribe must have the lead authority to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
manage the program (e.g., hold loans,
make loans, enter into loan agreements,
collect repayment, access and secure the
site in event of an emergency or loan
default). If the agency/department listed
as the point of contact for the section
128(a) cooperative agreement does not
have this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another agency within
that state or tribe has the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
F. Section 128(a) Cooperative
Agreements Can Be Part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG as described in 69 FR 51756,
August 20, 2004. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF or purchase
environmental insurance or develop a
risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
G. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine
the project period for each cooperative
agreement. These may be for multiple
years depending on the regional office’s
cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an
annual budget period tied to an annual
work plan. While not prohibited, preaward costs are subject to 40 CFR 35.113
and 40 CFR 35.513.
H. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section V. EPA will not fund state or
tribal response program annual work
plans if EPA determines that these
elements are not met or reasonable
progress is not being made. EPA may
base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, on progress
reports, or on EPA’s review of the state
or tribal response program.
I. Establishing and Maintaining the
Public Record
Prior to funding a state’s or tribe’s
annual work plan, EPA regional offices
will verify and document that a public
record, as described in Section VI and
below, exists and is being maintained.15
Specifically for:
15 For purposes of 128(a) funding, the state’s or
tribe’s public record applies to that state’s or tribe’s
response program(s) that utilized the section 128(a)
funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY17: Requests for
FY18 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the December 15, 2017 request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note, this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY17 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY17 funds prior to meeting the public
record requirement). States or tribes in
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds
once the public record requirement is
met; and
• States or tribes that received initial
funding in FY17: By the time of the
actual FY18 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY18
cooperative agreement that prohibits the
drawdown of FY18 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
J. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes should be aware that
EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place
significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years’ funding. Unused funds
prior to FY17 will be considered in the
allocation process. Existing balances of
cooperative agreement funds as
reflected in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse as of January 1, 2018 may
result in an allocation amount below a
recipient’s FY17 allocation amount or, if
appropriate the deobligation and
reallocation of prior funding by EPA
Regions as provided for in 40 CFR
35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518.
EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to
identify the amount of remaining prior
year(s) funds. The requestor should
work, as early as possible, with both
their own finance department, and with
their Regional Project Officer to
reconcile any discrepancy between the
amount of unspent funds showing in
EPA’s system, and the amount reflected
in the recipient’s records. The recipient
should obtain concurrence from the
Region on the amount of unspent funds
requiring justification by the deadline
for this request for funding.
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Funds
After the December 15, 2017, request
deadline, EPA’s Regional Offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal
requests to EPA Headquarters. Before
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
44621
capacity of the program, amount of
current year funding, funds remaining
from prior years, etc.).
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and make
decisions on the final funding
allocations.
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made. Please refer to process flow chart
below (dates are estimates and subject to
change):
IX. Information To Be Submitted With
the Funding Request
Financial Data Warehouse. The
recipient should consult with the region
regarding the amount of unspent funds
which require explanation to ensure
they have addressed the full amount of
any remaining balance.
If you do not have an MOA with EPA,
demonstrate how your program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section VI.
process to develop, or interest to start
one.
c. Describe if you have had adverse
audit findings. If you had problems with
the administration of any grants or
cooperative agreements, describe how
you have corrected, or are correcting,
the problems.
For tribal entities which have never
received CERCLA 128(a) funding,
respond to the following:
2. Funding Request.
a. Describe your plan to establish a
response program, why it is a priority
for your tribe, and why CERCLA 128(a)
funding will be beneficial to your
program. If your tribe is already
supported by a tribal consortia receiving
CERCLA 128(a) funding, explain why
additional resources are necessary.
b. Prepare a draft work plan and
budget for your first funding year. The
funding requested should be reasonably
spent in one year. For budget planning
purposes, it is recommended that you
assume funding sufficient to support 0.5
staff to establish a response program and
some travel to attend regional and
national trainings or events.
3. Programmatic Capability.
a. Describe the organizational
structure you will utilize to ensure
sound program management to
guarantee or confirm timely and
successful expenditure of funds, and
completion of all technical,
administrative and financial
requirements of the program and
cooperative agreement.
b. Include a brief description of the
key qualifications of staff to manage the
response program and/or the process
you will follow to hire staff to manage
the response program. If key staff is
already in place, include their roles,
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
A. Summary of Planned Use of FY18
Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY18
funds must submit (to their regional
brownfields contact, shown on the last
page of this guidance) a draft work plan
of the funds with associated dollar
amounts to their regional brownfields
contact listed on the last page. Please
contact your regional brownfields
contact or visit www.epa.gov/
brownfields/brownfieldscomprehensive-environmentalresponse-compensation-and-liabilityact-cercla for a sample draft work plan.
For entities which received CERCLA
128(a) funding in previous years,
respond to the following:
1. Funding Request.
a. Prepare a draft work plan and
budget for your FY18 funding request.
The funding requested should be
reasonably spent in one year. The
requestor should work, as early as
possible, with their EPA regional
program contact to ensure that the
funding amount requested and related
activities are reasonable.
b. In your funding request, include
the prior years’ funding amount. Include
any funds that you, the recipient, have
not received or drawn down in
payments (i.e., funds EPA has obligated
for grants that remain in EPA’s
Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the
allocation process when determining
the recipient’s programmatic needs. The
recipient should include a detailed
explanation and justification of prior
year funds that remain in EPA’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
Note: Programmatic Capability—[Only
Respond if Specifically Requested by Region]
EPA Regions may request
demonstration of Programmatic
Capability if the returning grantee has
experienced key staff turnover or if the
grantee has open programmatic review
findings. An entity’s corresponding EPA
Region will notify returning recipients if
the information below is required, and
it must be included with your funding
request. Describe the organizational
structure you will utilize to ensure
sound program management to
guarantee or confirm timely and
successful expenditure of funds, and
completion of all technical,
administrative and financial
requirements of the program and
cooperative agreement.
a. Include a brief description of the
key qualifications of staff to manage the
response program and/or the process
you will follow to hire staff to manage
the response program. If key staff is
already in place, include their roles,
expertise, qualifications, and
experience.
b. Discuss how this response program
fits into your current environmental
program(s). If you do not have an
environmental program, describe your
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
EN25SE17.000
doing so, regional offices may take into
account additional factors when
determining recommended allocation
amounts. Such factors include, but are
not limited to, the depth and breadth of
the state or tribal program, and scope of
the perceived need for funding (e.g., size
of state or tribal jurisdiction or the
proposed work plan balanced against
44622
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
expertise, qualifications, and
experience.
c. Discuss how this response program
fits into your current environmental
program(s). If you don’t have an
environmental program, describe your
process to develop, or interest to start
one.
d. Describe if you have had adverse
audit findings. If you had problems with
the administration of any grants or
cooperative agreements, describe how
you have corrected, or are correcting,
the problems.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and
tribal response programs will include
programmatic and administrative terms
and conditions. These terms and
conditions will describe EPA’s
substantial involvement including
technical assistance and collaboration
on program development and sitespecific activities. Each of the
subsections below summarizes the basic
terms and conditions, and related
reporting that will be incorporated into
your cooperative agreement.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.328
and any EPA specific regulations, state
and tribes must provide progress reports
meeting the terms and conditions of the
cooperative agreement negotiated. State
and tribal costs for complying with
reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must
include both a narrative discussion and
performance data relating to the state or
tribe accomplishments and
environmental outputs associated with
the approved budget and work plan.
Reports should also provide an
accounting of section 128(a) funding. If
applicable, the state or tribe must
include information on activities related
to establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. All recipients must
provide information related to
establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record.
Depending upon the activities included
in the state’s or tribe’s work plan, the
recipient may also need to report on the
following:
1. Interim and final progress reports.
Reports must prominently display the
following information as reflected in the
current EPA strategic plan: Strategic
Plan Goal 3: Cleaning Up Communities
and Advancing Sustainable
Development; Strategic Plan Objective
3.1: Promote Sustainable and Livable
Communities; and Work plan
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
Commitments and Timeframes. EPA’s
strategic plan can be found on the
internet at https://www.epa.gov/
planandbudget/strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they are
taking reasonable steps to establish or
enhance the element as negotiated in
individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(B), reports on the oversight
and enforcement authorities/
mechanisms element may include:
• A narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
Æ Legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements); and
Æ policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
• A description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
• A narrative description of how
these authorities or other mechanisms,
and resources, are adequate to ensure
that:
Æ A response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
• A narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
3. Reporting for site-specific
assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for brownfields site assessment
or cleanup must input information
required by the OMB-approved Property
Profile Form into the ACRES database
for each site assessment and cleanup. In
addition, recipients must report how
they provide the affected community
with prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful participation as per
CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii), on
proposed cleanup plans and site
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
activities. For example, EPA strongly
encourages states and tribes to seek
public input regarding the priority of
sites to be addressed and to solicit input
from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice
communities, communities with a
health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote communities, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must include a
description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the
activity was conducted. For example:
• Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups;
• Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted;
• Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities; and
• Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using
funding for an RLF. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for a
revolving loan fund must include the
information required by the terms and
conditions for progress reporting under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF
cooperative agreements.
6. Reporting environmental insurance.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for environmental insurance
must report:
• Number and description of
insurance policies purchased (e.g., name
of insurer, type of coverage provided,
dollar limits of coverage, any buffers or
deductibles, category and identity of
insured persons, premium, first dollar
or umbrella, whether site specific or
blanket, occurrence or claims made,
etc.);
• The number of sites covered by the
insurance;
• The amount of funds spent on
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
dedicated to insurance program, or to
insurance premiums); and
• The amount of claims paid by
insurers to policy holders.
The regional offices may also request
that information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
December 15, 2017, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2016 through September 30,
2017). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer:
• Environmental programs where
CERCLA section 128(a) funds are used
to support capacity building (general
program support, non-site-specific
work). Indicate as appropriate from the
following:
llBrownfields
llUnderground Storage Tanks/
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
llFederal Facilities
llSolid Waste
llSuperfund
llHazardous Waste Facilities
llVCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program,
Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
llOtherlllll;
• Number of properties (or sites)
enrolled in a response program during
FY17;
• Number of properties (or sites)
where documentation indicates that
cleanup work is complete and all
required institutional controls (IC’s) are
in place, or not required;
• Total number of acres associated
with properties (or sites) in the previous
bullet;
• Number of properties where
assistance was provided, but the
property was not enrolled in the
response program (OPTIONAL);
• Date that the public record was last
updated;
• Estimated total number of
properties (or sites) in your brownfields
inventory;
• Number of audits/inspections/
reviews/other conducted to ensure
engineering controls and institutional
controls are still protective; and
• Did you develop or revise
legislation, regulations, codes, guidance
documents or policies related to
establishing or enhancing your
Voluntary Cleanup Program/Response
Program during FY17? If yes, please
indicate the type and whether it was
new or revised.
EPA may require states/tribes to
report specific performance measures
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
related to the four elements that can be
aggregated for national reporting to
Congress.
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as
specified in the terms and conditions of
their cooperative agreement, and in
Section VIII.I of this guidance,
information related to establishing, or if
already established, maintaining the
public record, described above. States
and tribes can refer to an already
existing public record (e.g., Web site or
other public database to meet the public
record requirement). To meet the
reporting requirement, recipients
reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record (a)
exists and is up-to-date, and (b) is
adequate. A public record must, as
appropriate, include the following
information:
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed in the past
year including:
• Date the response action was
completed;
• site name;
• name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known;
• location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• whether an institutional control is
in place;
• type of institutional control(s) in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
contaminants or pollutants, petroleum
contamination, etc.); and
• size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed
by the state or tribal response program
in the coming year including:
• Site name and the name of owner
at time of cleanup, if known;
• location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• to the extent known, whether an
institutional control is in place;
• type of the institutional control(s)
in place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• to the extent known, the nature of
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.); and
• size of the site in acres
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44623
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive
Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they
have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the
subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements
established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR part 170, unless they qualify for an
exception from the requirements,
should they be selected for funding.
2. System for Award Management
(SAM) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these
requirements under OMB guidance at 2
CFR part 25 (e.g., individuals),
applicants must:
1. Be registered in SAM prior to
submitting an application or proposal
under this announcement. SAM
information can be found at https://
www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/;
2. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information at
all times during which they have an
active federal award or an application or
proposal under consideration by an
agency; and
3. Provide their DUNS number in
each application or proposal submitted
to the agency. Applicants can receive a
DUNS number, at no cost, by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1–866–705–5711, or
visiting the D&B Web site at: https://
www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with
these requirements, it will affect their
ability to receive the award.
Please note that the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) system has been
replaced by the System for Award
Management (SAM). To learn more
about SAM, go to SAM.gov or https://
www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
3. Submitting an Application via
Grants.gov
If funding is provided it will be
provided through a cooperative
agreement award. All cooperative
agreement applications for noncompetitive assistance agreements must
be submitted using Grants.gov. Below is
the information that the applicant will
use to submit their State and Tribal
Response Program Grant applications
via Grants.gov: CDFA number: 66.817,
Funding Opportunity Number (FON):
EPA–CEP–02, To learn more about the
Grants.gov submission requirements, go
to https://www.epa.gov/grants/howapply-grants.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
44624
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2017 / Notices
4. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award
under this announcement is expected to
manage assistance agreement funds
efficiently and effectively, and make
sufficient progress towards completing
the project activities described in the
work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms
and conditions related to implementing
this requirement.
REGIONAL STATE AND TRIBAL BROWNFIELDS CONTACTS
Region
State
Tribal
1. CT, ME, MA,
NH, RI, VT.
James Byrne, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OSRR07–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617) 918–1389 Fax (617)
918–1294.
John Struble, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4291 Fax (212) 637–3083.
Michael Taurino, 1650 Arch Street (3HS51), Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone (215) 814–3371 Fax (215) 814–3274.
Cindy Nolan, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10th Fl (9T25), Atlanta,
GA 30303–8960, Phone (404) 562–8425 Fax (404) 562–
8788.
Jan Pels, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SB–5J), Chicago, IL
60604–3507, Phone (312) 886–3009 Fax (312) 692–2161.
AmyJean McKeown, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617) 918–
1248 Fax (617) 918–1294.
Phillip Clappin, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4431 Fax (212) 637–3083.
2. NJ, NY, PR,
VI.
3. DE, DC, MD,
PA, VA, WV.
4. AL, FL, GA,
KY, MS, NC,
SC, TN.
5. IL, IN, MI,
MN, OH, WI.
6. AR, LA, NM,
OK, TX.
7. IA, KS, MO,
NE.
8. CO, MT, ND,
SD, UT, WY.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
9. AZ, CA, HI,
NV, AS, GU,
MP.
10. AK, ID, OR,
WA.
Amber Howard, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas, TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax (214)
665–6660.
Susan Klein, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913) 551–
9786.
Christina Wilson, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–AR), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6706 Fax (303) 312–
6065.
Eugenia Chow, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco,
CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3160 Fax (415) 947–3520.
Olga Perry, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10th Fl (9T25), Atlanta,
GA 30303–8960, Phone (404) 562–8534 Fax (404) 562–
8788.
Kirstin Kuenzi, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SB–5J), Chicago, IL 60604–3507, Phone (312) 886–6015 Fax (312)
697–2075.
Freda Hardaway, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas, TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–8342 Fax (214)
665–6660.
Jennifer Morris, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7341 Fax (913) 551–
9341.
Melisa Devincenzi, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–AR), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6377 Fax (303) 312–
6962.
Jose Garcia, Jr., 600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1460, Los Angeles,
CA 90017, Phone (213) 244–1811 Fax (213) 244–1850.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513 Phone (907) 271–3414 Fax (907) 271–
3424.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513 Phone (907) 271–3414 Fax (907) 271–
3424.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review under
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Because this
action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1999
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). In addition,
this action does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action does not create new binding legal
requirements that substantially and
directly affect Tribes under Executive
Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action does not have
significant Federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this
action is not subject to Executive Order
13211, entitled Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:45 Sep 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). This action does not
involve technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before
certain actions may take effect, the
agency promulgating the action must
submit a report, which includes a copy
of the action, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Because this final
action does not contain legally binding
requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: September 1, 2017.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Land and Emergency
Management.
[FR Doc. 2017–20436 Filed 9–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44615-44624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20436]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9967-74-OLEM]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2018
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will accept
requests, from October 15, 2017 through December 15, 2017, for grants
to establish and enhance State and Tribal Response Programs. This
notice provides guidance on eligibility for funding, use of funding,
grant mechanisms and process for awarding funding, the allocation
system for distribution of funding, and terms and reporting under these
grants. EPA has consulted with state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements of a response program and establishing a public
record. Another goal is to provide funding for other activities that
increase the number of response actions conducted or overseen by a
state or tribal response program. This funding is not intended to
supplant current state or tribal funding for their response programs.
Instead, it is to supplement their funding to increase their response
capacity.
For fiscal year 2018, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is applicable as of October 15, 2017. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2018.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA Regional Offices and EPA
Headquarters can be found at www.epa.gov/brownfields and at the end of
this Notice. Funding requests may be submitted electronically to the
EPA Regional Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA's Office of Land and Emergency
Management, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization, (202) 566-
2745 or the applicable EPA Regional Office listed at the end this
Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. CERCLA section 128(a) response
program grants are funded with categorical \3\ State and Tribal
Assistance Grant (STAG) appropriations. Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements are awarded and administered by the EPA regional offices.
Generally, these response programs address the assessment, cleanup, and
redevelopment of brownfields sites and other sites with actual or
perceived contamination. This document provides guidance that will
enable states and tribes to apply for and use Fiscal Year 2018 section
128(a) funds.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, November 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a).
\3\ Categorical grants are issued by the U.S. Congress to fund
state and local governments for narrowly defined purposes.
\4\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part 35 Subparts A
and B, with the exception of funds used to capitalize a revolving loan
fund for brownfield remediation
[[Page 44616]]
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase environmental insurance or
developing a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a State or
Tribal response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted from October 15, 2017 through
December 15, 2017. Requests EPA receives after December 15, 2017 will
not be considered for FY2018 funding. Information that must be
submitted with the funding request is listed in Section IX of this
guidance. States or tribes that do not submit the request in the
appropriate manner may forfeit their ability to receive funds. First
time requestors are strongly encouraged to contact their Regional EPA
Brownfields contacts, listed at the end of this guidance, prior to
submitting their funding request. EPA will consider funding requests up
to a maximum of $1.0 million per state or tribe for FY2018.
Requests submitted by the December 15, 2017 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final funding allocation
determinations are made. As in previous years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
section 128(a) funding in making allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance. Also, EPA will prioritize funding for
recipients establishing their response programs.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement's final package. For more information, please go
to www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at brownfield sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of these programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA related
activities, while others are multi-faceted, addressing sites regulated
by both CERCLA and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Many states also offer accompanying financial incentive programs to
spur cleanup and redevelopment. In enacting CERCLA section 128(a),\5\
Congress recognized the value of state and tribal response programs in
cleaning up and redeveloping brownfield sites. Section 128(a)
strengthens EPA's partnerships with states and tribes, and recognizes
the response programs' critical role in overseeing cleanups.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This funding is intended for those states and tribes that have the
required management and administrative capacity within their government
to administer a federal grant. The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain elements of an environmental
response program and that the program establishes and maintains a
public record of sites addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
provide technical assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
1. Demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program
described in Section V of this guidance; or be a party to a voluntary
response program Memorandum of Agreement (VRP MOA) \6\ with EPA; AND
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that
maintain and make available a public record are automatically
eligible for section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year (see CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C)).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under section 128(a), with the exception
of section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund (RLF), for which there is a 20% cost
share requirement. Section 128(a) funds uses to capitalize a RLF must
be operated in accordance with CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements--Section 128(a)(2)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements described below.
Achievement of the four elements should be viewed as a priority.
Section 128(a) authorizes funding for activities necessary to establish
and enhance the four elements, and to establish and maintain the public
record requirement.
The four elements of a response program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfield sites in state or
tribal land. The goal for this element is to enable the state or tribe
to establish or enhance a system or process that will provide a
reasonable estimate of the number, likely locations, and the general
characteristics of brownfields sites in their state or tribal lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of state and tribal response
programs and will not require states and tribes to develop a ``list''
of brownfield sites. However, at a minimum, the state or tribe should
develop and/or maintain a system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfield sites within their state or tribal lands.
Inventories should evolve to a prioritization of sites based on
community needs, planning priorities, and protection of human health
and the environment. Inventories should be developed in direct
coordination with communities, and particular attention should focus on
communities with limited capacity to compete for and manage a
competitive brownfield assessment, revolving loan, or cleanup
cooperative agreement.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. The goal for this element is to have state and tribal
response programs that include oversight and enforcement authorities or
other mechanisms, and resources to ensure that:
a. A response action will protect human health and the environment,
and be conducted in accordance with applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the necessary response
activities if the person conducting the response fails to
[[Page 44617]]
complete them (this includes operation and maintenance and/or long-term
monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.\7\ The goal for this element is to have states
and tribes include in their response program mechanisms and resources
for meaningful public participation, at the local level, including, at
a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-community-involvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Public access to documents and related materials that a state,
tribe, or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing to
make cleanup decisions or conduct site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for meaningful public comment on
cleanup plans and site activities, including the input into the
prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfield site--located in the community in which the
person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of cleanup plans, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. The goal for this element is to
have states and tribes include in their response program mechanisms to
approve cleanup plans and to verify that response actions are complete,
including a requirement for certification or similar documentation from
the state, the tribe, or a licensed site professional that the response
action is complete. Written approval by a state or tribal response
program official of a proposed cleanup plan is an example of an
approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, as described below, to enable meaningful public
participation (refer to Section V.3 above). Specifically, under section
128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes must:
1. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a public record that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions have been completed during the previous
year;
2. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a public record that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions are planned in the next year; and
3. Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy and include relevant information concerning the
entity responsible for oversight, monitoring, and/or maintenance of the
institutional and engineering controls; and how the responsible entity
is implementing those activities (see Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``Survey and Inventory'' Element From the
``Public Record''
It is important to note that the public record requirement differs
from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element described in the
``Four Elements'' section above. The public record addresses sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year or are
planned in the upcoming year. In contrast, the ``timely survey and
inventory'' element, described above, refers to identifying brownfield
sites regardless of planned or completed actions.
B. Making the Public Record Easily Accessible
EPA's goal is to enable states and tribes to make the public record
and other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow
states and tribes to use section 128(a) funding to make such
information available to the public via the internet or other avenues.
For example, the Agency would support funding state and tribal efforts
to include detailed location information in the public record such as
the street address, and latitude and longitude information for each
site.\8\ States and tribes should ensure that all affected communities
have appropriate access to the public record by making it available on-
line, in print at libraries, or at other community gathering places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For further information on data quality requirements for
latitude and longitude information, please see EPA's data standards
Web site available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/latlongstandard-v2a_10022014.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on institutional controls, on a long-term
basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has
been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, states or
tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure
long-term maintenance of the public record, including information on
institutional controls (such as ensuring the entity responsible for
oversight, monitoring, and/or maintenance of the institutional and
engineering controls is implementing those activities) in their work
plans.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA's institutional controls Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use funding to ``establish or enhance'' its response program.
Specifically, a state or tribe may use cooperative agreement funds to
build response programs that include the four elements outline in
section 128(a)(2). Eligible activities include, but are not limited to,
the following:
Developing legislation, regulations, procedures,
ordinances, guidance, etc. that establish or enhance the administrative
and legal structure of a response program;
Establishing and maintaining the required public record
described in Section VI of this guidance;
Operation, maintenance and long-term monitoring of
institutional controls and engineering controls;
Conducting site-specific activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the
[[Page 44618]]
four elements. In addition to the requirement under CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public comment on cleanup plans and
site activities, EPA strongly encourages states and tribes to seek
public input regarding the priority of sites to be addressed-especially
from local communities with health risks related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health concerns, those in economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and those with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA will not provide section 128(a)
funds solely for assessment or cleanup of specific brownfield sites;
site-specific activities must be part of an overall section 128(a) work
plan that includes funding for other activities that establish or
enhance the four elements;
Capitalizing a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields
cleanup as authorized under CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are
subject to the same statutory requirements and cooperative agreement
terms and conditions applicable to RLFs awarded under section
104(k)(3). Requirements include a 20 percent match (in the form of
money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal source) on the
amount of section 128(a) funds used for the RLF, a prohibition on using
EPA cooperative agreement funds for administrative costs relating to
the RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF loans or subgrants for response
costs at a site for which the recipient may be potentially liable under
section 107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions relevant to CERCLA section
104(k)(4) also apply; and
Purchasing environmental insurance or developing a risk-
sharing pool, indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a state or tribal response
program.
B. Uses Related to Establishing a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), establish includes activities
necessary to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or
tribal response program and the public record requirement. For example,
a state or tribal response program may use section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, guidance, and a public
record.
States and tribes also need to comply with Grants Policy Issuance
(GPI) 17-01 Sustainability in EPA Cooperative Agreements.
C. Uses Related to Enhancing a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), enhancing a state or tribal response
program includes related to activities that add to or improve a state
or tribal response program or increase the number of sites at which
response actions are conducted under such programs.
The exact enhancement activities that may be allowable depend upon
the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state
or tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
(e.g., RCRA or Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)). As another example,
states and tribal response program enhancement activities can also
include outreach to local communities to increase awareness about
brownfields, building a sustainable brownfields program, federal
brownfields technical assistance opportunities \10\ (e.g., holding
workshops to assist communities to apply for federal Brownfields grant
funding), and knowledge regarding the importance of monitoring
engineering and institutional controls. Additionally, enhancement
activities can include facilitating the participation of the state and
local agencies (e.g., transportation, water, other infrastructure) in
implementation of brownfields projects. States and tribes can also help
local communities collaborate with local workforce development entities
or Brownfields Environmental Workforce Development Job training
recipients on the assessment and cleanup of brownfield sites.\11\
States and tribes also need to comply with Grants Policy Issuance (GPI)
17-01 Sustainability in EPA Cooperative Agreements. Other enhancement
uses may be allowable as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ EPA expects states and tribes will familiarize themselves
with US EPA's brownfields technical assistance opportunities for
brownfields communities. For more information on technical
assistance opportunities, please visit: https://www.epa.gov/brownfields.
\11\ For more information about EPA's Brownfields Environmental
Workforce Development and Job Training Program, please visit:
https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/types-brownfields-grant-funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
1. Eligible Uses of Funds for Site-Specific Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups can be both eligible and
allowable if the activities are included in the work plan negotiated
between the EPA regional office and the state or tribe, but activities
must comply with all applicable laws and are subject to the following
restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or
cleanups at sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at
CERCLA section 101(39). EPA encourages states and tribes to use site-
specific funding to perform assessment (e.g., phase I, phase II,
supplemental assessments and cleanup planning) and cleanup activities
that will expedite the reuse and redevelopment of sites, and prioritize
sites based on need.\12\ Furthermore, states and tribes that perform
site-specific activities should plan to directly engage with and
involve affected communities. For example, a Community Relations Plan
(CRP) could be developed to provide reasonable notice about a planned
cleanup, as well as opportunities for the public to comment on the
cleanup. States and tribes should work towards securing additional
funding for site-specific activities by leveraging resources from other
sources such as businesses, non-profit organizations, education and
training providers, and/or federal, state, tribal, and local
governments;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ An example of prioritizing sites based on need can be
focusing on environmental justice. EPA defines environmental justice
as the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental
laws, regulations, and policies. EPA has this goal for all
communities and persons across the nation. Environmental justice
will be achieved when everyone enjoys the same degree of protection
from environmental and health hazards and equal access to the
decision-making process to have a healthy environment in which to
live, learn, and work. For more information, please visit
www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site assessment
can be funded with section 128(a) funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site cleanup can be funded with section 128(a) funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded
under this agreement to assess and/or clean-up sites owned or operated
by the recipient
[[Page 44619]]
or held in trust by the United States Government for the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
section 107, except:
At brownfield sites contaminated by a controlled substance
as defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set
forth in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser, or would satisfy all elements 101(40), except where the date
of acquisition of the property was on or before January 11, 2002.
Subawards are defined at 2 CFR 200.92 and may not be awarded to
for-profit organizations. If the recipient plans on making any
subawards under the cooperative agreement, then they become a pass-
through entity. As the pass-through entity, the recipient must report
on its subaward monitoring activities under 2 CFR 200.331(d).
Additional reporting requirements for these activities will be included
in the cooperative agreement. In addition, subawards cannot be provided
to entities that may be potentially responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted, except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth
in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser, or would satisfy all elements of CERCLA 101(40)(D) except
where the date of acquisition of the property was on or before January
11, 2002.
2. Limitations on the Amount of Funds Used for Site-Specific Activities
and Waiver Process
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities that improve state or tribal capacity. However, the amount
recipients may request for site-specific assessments and cleanups may
not exceed 50% of the total amount of funding.\13\ In order to exceed
the 50% site-specific funding limit, a state or tribe must submit a
waiver request. The total amount of the site-specific request may not
exceed the recipient's total funding level for the previous year. The
funding request must include a brief justification describing the
reason(s) for spending more than 50% of an annual allocation on site-
specific activities. An applicant, when requesting a waiver, must
include the following information in the written justification:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Oversight of assessment and cleanup activities performed by
responsible parties (other than the state or tribe) does not count
toward the 50% limit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount requested for site-specific activities;
Percentage of the site-specific activities (assuming
waiver is approved) in the total budget;
Site-specific activities that will be covered by this
funding. If known, provide site specific information and describe how
work on each site contributes to the development or enhancement of your
state/tribal site response program. Explain how the community will be
(or has been) involved in prioritization of site work and especially
those sites where there is a potential or known significant
environmental impact to the community;
An explanation of how this shift in funding will not
negatively impact the core programmatic capacity (i.e., the ability to
establish/enhance the four required elements of a response program) and
how the core program activities will be maintained in spite of an
increase in site-specific work. Recipients must demonstrate that they
have adequate funding from other sources to effectively carry out work
on the four elements for EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit on
using 128(a) funds for site-specific activities; and
An explanation as to whether the sites to be addressed are
those for which the affected community(ies) has requested work be
conducted (refer to Section VII.A Overview of Funding for more
information).
EPA Headquarters will review waiver requests based on the
information in the justification and other information available to the
Agency. EPA will inform recipients whether the waiver is approved.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfield
Sites
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance response programs addressing petroleum brownfield
sites. Subject to the restrictions listed above (see Section VII.D.1)
for all site-specific activities, the costs of site-specific
assessments and cleanup activities at petroleum contaminated brownfield
sites, as defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are both
eligible and allowable if the activity is included in the work plan
negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state or tribe.
Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be used
at brownfield sites contaminated by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Additional Examples of Eligible Site-Specific Activities
Other eligible uses of funds for site-specific related include, but
are not limited to, the following activities:
Technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative
agreement recipients;
Development and/or review of quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs); and
Entering data into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database
E. Uses Related to Activities at ``Non-Brownfield'' Sites
Other uses not specifically referenced in this guidance may also be
eligible and allowable. Recipients should consult with their regional
state or tribal contact for additional guidance. Costs incurred for
activities at non-brownfield sites may be eligible and allowable if
such activities are included in the state's or tribe's work plan.
Direct assessment and cleanup activities may only be conducted on
eligible brownfield sites, as defined in CERCLA section 101(39).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines for 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \14\ between EPA and a state or a tribe. The
program administers cooperative agreements under the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit requirements for
Federal Awards regulations for all entity types including states,
tribes, and local governments found in the Code of Federal Regulations
at 2 CFR part 200 and any applicable EPA regulations in Title 2 CFR
Subtitle B--Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements
Chapter 15 as well as applicable provisions of 40 CFR part 35 Subparts
A and B. Under these regulations, the cooperative agreement recipient
for a section 128(a) grant is the government to which a cooperative
agreement is awarded and which is accountable for use of the funds
provided. The cooperative agreement recipient is the legal entity even
if only a particular component of the entity is designated in the
cooperative agreement award
[[Page 44620]]
document. Further, unexpended balances of cooperative agreement funds
are subject to restrictions under 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518. EPA
allocates funds to state and tribal response programs consistent with
40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a state/tribe
that includes substantial involvement by EPA on activities described
in the work plan which may include technical assistance,
collaboration on program priorities, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional offices will
negotiate and enter into section 128(a) cooperative agreements with
eligible and interested states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or tribe.
B. Maximum Funding Request
For Fiscal Year 2018, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.0 million per state or tribe. Please note that demand for
this program continues to increase. Due to the increasing number of
entities requesting funding, it is likely that the FY18 states and
tribal individual funding amounts will be less than the FY17 individual
funding amounts.
C. Define the State or Tribal Response Program
States and tribes must define in their work plan the ``section
128(a) response program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and
may designate a component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's
primary point of contact. When EPA funds the section 128(a) cooperative
agreement, states and tribes may distribute these funds among the
appropriate state and tribal agencies that are part of the section
128(a) response program. This distribution must be clearly outlined in
their annual work plan.
D. Separate Cooperative Agreements for the Capitalization of RLFs Using
Section 128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant funds requested will be
used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for cleanup, pursuant to
section 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative agreements must be awarded
(i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF uses). States and tribes
must, however, submit one initial request for funding, delineating the
RLF as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF
are not eligible for inclusion into a Performance Partnership Grant
(PPG).
E. Authority To Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its section 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund program, the state or tribe must have
the lead authority to manage the program (e.g., hold loans, make loans,
enter into loan agreements, collect repayment, access and secure the
site in event of an emergency or loan default). If the agency/
department listed as the point of contact for the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement does not have this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another agency within that state or tribe has the
authority to manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
F. Section 128(a) Cooperative Agreements Can Be Part of a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section 128(a) cooperative agreements
in their PPG as described in 69 FR 51756, August 20, 2004. Section
128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF or purchase environmental
insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not eligible for inclusion in the
PPG.
G. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine the project period for each
cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years depending on the
regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each cooperative
agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an annual work
plan. While not prohibited, pre-award costs are subject to 40 CFR
35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
H. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan negotiation process, states or
tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to include, the four elements
described in Section V. EPA will not fund state or tribal response
program annual work plans if EPA determines that these elements are not
met or reasonable progress is not being made. EPA may base this
determination on the information the state or tribe provides to support
its work plan, on progress reports, or on EPA's review of the state or
tribal response program.
I. Establishing and Maintaining the Public Record
Prior to funding a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and document that a public record, as
described in Section VI and below, exists and is being maintained.\15\
Specifically for:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ For purposes of 128(a) funding, the state's or tribe's
public record applies to that state's or tribe's response program(s)
that utilized the section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States or tribes that received initial funding prior to
FY17: Requests for FY18 funds will not be accepted from states or
tribes that fail to demonstrate, by the December 15, 2017 request
deadline, that they established and are maintaining a public record.
(Note, this would potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term
and condition placed on their FY17 cooperative agreement that
prohibited drawdown of FY17 funds prior to meeting the public record
requirement). States or tribes in this situation will not be prevented
from drawing down their prior year funds once the public record
requirement is met; and
States or tribes that received initial funding in FY17: By
the time of the actual FY18 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate
that they established and maintained the public record (those states
and tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY18 cooperative agreement that prohibits the
drawdown of FY18 funds until the public record requirement is met).
J. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes should be aware that EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years' funding. Unused funds prior to FY17 will be considered
in the allocation process. Existing balances of cooperative agreement
funds as reflected in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse as of January 1,
2018 may result in an allocation amount below a recipient's FY17
allocation amount or, if appropriate the deobligation and reallocation
of prior funding by EPA Regions as provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40
CFR 35.518.
EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database Warehouse
to identify the amount of remaining prior year(s) funds. The requestor
should work, as early as possible, with both their own finance
department, and with their Regional Project Officer to reconcile any
discrepancy between the amount of unspent funds showing in EPA's
system, and the amount reflected in the recipient's records. The
recipient should obtain concurrence from the Region on the amount of
unspent funds requiring justification by the deadline for this request
for funding.
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Funds
After the December 15, 2017, request deadline, EPA's Regional
Offices will submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA
Headquarters. Before
[[Page 44621]]
doing so, regional offices may take into account additional factors
when determining recommended allocation amounts. Such factors include,
but are not limited to, the depth and breadth of the state or tribal
program, and scope of the perceived need for funding (e.g., size of
state or tribal jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against
capacity of the program, amount of current year funding, funds
remaining from prior years, etc.).
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and make decisions on the final funding
allocations.
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
Please refer to process flow chart below (dates are estimates and
subject to change):
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN25SE17.000
IX. Information To Be Submitted With the Funding Request
A. Summary of Planned Use of FY18 Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY18 funds must submit (to their
regional brownfields contact, shown on the last page of this guidance)
a draft work plan of the funds with associated dollar amounts to their
regional brownfields contact listed on the last page. Please contact
your regional brownfields contact or visit www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation-and-liability-act-cercla for a sample draft work plan.
For entities which received CERCLA 128(a) funding in previous
years, respond to the following:
1. Funding Request.
a. Prepare a draft work plan and budget for your FY18 funding
request. The funding requested should be reasonably spent in one year.
The requestor should work, as early as possible, with their EPA
regional program contact to ensure that the funding amount requested
and related activities are reasonable.
b. In your funding request, include the prior years' funding
amount. Include any funds that you, the recipient, have not received or
drawn down in payments (i.e., funds EPA has obligated for grants that
remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will take into account
these funds in the allocation process when determining the recipient's
programmatic needs. The recipient should include a detailed explanation
and justification of prior year funds that remain in EPA's Financial
Data Warehouse. The recipient should consult with the region regarding
the amount of unspent funds which require explanation to ensure they
have addressed the full amount of any remaining balance.
If you do not have an MOA with EPA, demonstrate how your program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to include, the four elements
described in Section VI.
Note: Programmatic Capability--[Only Respond if Specifically
Requested by Region]
EPA Regions may request demonstration of Programmatic Capability if
the returning grantee has experienced key staff turnover or if the
grantee has open programmatic review findings. An entity's
corresponding EPA Region will notify returning recipients if the
information below is required, and it must be included with your
funding request. Describe the organizational structure you will utilize
to ensure sound program management to guarantee or confirm timely and
successful expenditure of funds, and completion of all technical,
administrative and financial requirements of the program and
cooperative agreement.
a. Include a brief description of the key qualifications of staff
to manage the response program and/or the process you will follow to
hire staff to manage the response program. If key staff is already in
place, include their roles, expertise, qualifications, and experience.
b. Discuss how this response program fits into your current
environmental program(s). If you do not have an environmental program,
describe your process to develop, or interest to start one.
c. Describe if you have had adverse audit findings. If you had
problems with the administration of any grants or cooperative
agreements, describe how you have corrected, or are correcting, the
problems.
For tribal entities which have never received CERCLA 128(a)
funding, respond to the following:
2. Funding Request.
a. Describe your plan to establish a response program, why it is a
priority for your tribe, and why CERCLA 128(a) funding will be
beneficial to your program. If your tribe is already supported by a
tribal consortia receiving CERCLA 128(a) funding, explain why
additional resources are necessary.
b. Prepare a draft work plan and budget for your first funding
year. The funding requested should be reasonably spent in one year. For
budget planning purposes, it is recommended that you assume funding
sufficient to support 0.5 staff to establish a response program and
some travel to attend regional and national trainings or events.
3. Programmatic Capability.
a. Describe the organizational structure you will utilize to ensure
sound program management to guarantee or confirm timely and successful
expenditure of funds, and completion of all technical, administrative
and financial requirements of the program and cooperative agreement.
b. Include a brief description of the key qualifications of staff
to manage the response program and/or the process you will follow to
hire staff to manage the response program. If key staff is already in
place, include their roles,
[[Page 44622]]
expertise, qualifications, and experience.
c. Discuss how this response program fits into your current
environmental program(s). If you don't have an environmental program,
describe your process to develop, or interest to start one.
d. Describe if you have had adverse audit findings. If you had
problems with the administration of any grants or cooperative
agreements, describe how you have corrected, or are correcting, the
problems.
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities. Each of the subsections below summarizes
the basic terms and conditions, and related reporting that will be
incorporated into your cooperative agreement.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.328 and any EPA specific regulations,
state and tribes must provide progress reports meeting the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement negotiated. State and tribal
costs for complying with reporting requirements are an eligible expense
under the section 128(a) cooperative agreement. As a minimum, state or
tribal progress reports must include both a narrative discussion and
performance data relating to the state or tribe accomplishments and
environmental outputs associated with the approved budget and work
plan. Reports should also provide an accounting of section 128(a)
funding. If applicable, the state or tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or enhancing the four elements of
the state's or tribe's response program. All recipients must provide
information related to establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record. Depending upon the activities included
in the state's or tribe's work plan, the recipient may also need to
report on the following:
1. Interim and final progress reports. Reports must prominently
display the following information as reflected in the current EPA
strategic plan: Strategic Plan Goal 3: Cleaning Up Communities and
Advancing Sustainable Development; Strategic Plan Objective 3.1:
Promote Sustainable and Livable Communities; and Work plan Commitments
and Timeframes. EPA's strategic plan can be found on the internet at
https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without
a VRP MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing
the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
A narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
[cir] Legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements); and
[cir] policies and procedures to implement legal authorities; and
other mechanisms;
A description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
A narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] A response action will protect human health and the
environment; and be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and
state law; and if the person conducting the response action fails to
complete the necessary response activities, including operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response
activities are completed; and
A narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
3. Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form into the ACRES database for each site
assessment and cleanup. In addition, recipients must report how they
provide the affected community with prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful participation as per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii), on
proposed cleanup plans and site activities. For example, EPA strongly
encourages states and tribes to seek public input regarding the
priority of sites to be addressed and to solicit input from local
communities, especially potential environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste
or other public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
communities, and communities with limited experience working with
government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for other site-specific related
activities must include a description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For
example:
Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups;
Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted;
Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities; and
Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using funding for an RLF. Recipients
with work plans that include funding for a revolving loan fund must
include the information required by the terms and conditions for
progress reporting under CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative
agreements.
6. Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for environmental insurance must report:
Number and description of insurance policies purchased
(e.g., name of insurer, type of coverage provided, dollar limits of
coverage, any buffers or deductibles, category and identity of insured
persons, premium, first dollar or umbrella, whether site specific or
blanket, occurrence or claims made, etc.);
The number of sites covered by the insurance;
The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance
(e.g., amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance
premiums); and
The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders.
The regional offices may also request that information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
[[Page 44623]]
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by December 15, 2017, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2016 through
September 30, 2017). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer:
Environmental programs where CERCLA section 128(a) funds
are used to support capacity building (general program support, non-
site-specific work). Indicate as appropriate from the following:
__Brownfields
__Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
__Federal Facilities
__Solid Waste
__Superfund
__Hazardous Waste Facilities
__VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program, Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
__Other_____;
Number of properties (or sites) enrolled in a response
program during FY17;
Number of properties (or sites) where documentation
indicates that cleanup work is complete and all required institutional
controls (IC's) are in place, or not required;
Total number of acres associated with properties (or
sites) in the previous bullet;
Number of properties where assistance was provided, but
the property was not enrolled in the response program (OPTIONAL);
Date that the public record was last updated;
Estimated total number of properties (or sites) in your
brownfields inventory;
Number of audits/inspections/reviews/other conducted to
ensure engineering controls and institutional controls are still
protective; and
Did you develop or revise legislation, regulations, codes,
guidance documents or policies related to establishing or enhancing
your Voluntary Cleanup Program/Response Program during FY17? If yes,
please indicate the type and whether it was new or revised.
EPA may require states/tribes to report specific performance
measures related to the four elements that can be aggregated for
national reporting to Congress.
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as specified in the terms and
conditions of their cooperative agreement, and in Section VIII.I of
this guidance, information related to establishing, or if already
established, maintaining the public record, described above. States and
tribes can refer to an already existing public record (e.g., Web site
or other public database to meet the public record requirement). To
meet the reporting requirement, recipients reporting may only be
required to demonstrate that the public record (a) exists and is up-to-
date, and (b) is adequate. A public record must, as appropriate,
include the following information:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed in
the past year including:
Date the response action was completed;
site name;
name of owner at time of cleanup, if known;
location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
whether an institutional control is in place;
type of institutional control(s) in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants or pollutants, petroleum contamination, etc.);
and
size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program in the coming year including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known;
location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
to the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place;
type of the institutional control(s) in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
to the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.); and
size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR part 170, unless they qualify for an exception from the
requirements, should they be selected for funding.
2. System for Award Management (SAM) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these requirements under OMB guidance at 2 CFR
part 25 (e.g., individuals), applicants must:
1. Be registered in SAM prior to submitting an application or
proposal under this announcement. SAM information can be found at
https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/;
2. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at
all times during which they have an active federal award or an
application or proposal under consideration by an agency; and
3. Provide their DUNS number in each application or proposal
submitted to the agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS number, at no
cost, by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 1-
866-705-5711, or visiting the D&B Web site at: https://www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with these requirements, it will
affect their ability to receive the award.
Please note that the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) system
has been replaced by the System for Award Management (SAM). To learn
more about SAM, go to SAM.gov or https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
3. Submitting an Application via Grants.gov
If funding is provided it will be provided through a cooperative
agreement award. All cooperative agreement applications for non-
competitive assistance agreements must be submitted using Grants.gov.
Below is the information that the applicant will use to submit their
State and Tribal Response Program Grant applications via Grants.gov:
CDFA number: 66.817, Funding Opportunity Number (FON): EPA-CEP-02, To
learn more about the Grants.gov submission requirements, go to https://www.epa.gov/grants/how-apply-grants.
[[Page 44624]]
4. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is
expected to manage assistance agreement funds efficiently and
effectively, and make sufficient progress towards completing the
project activities described in the work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms and conditions related to
implementing this requirement.
Regional State and Tribal Brownfields Contacts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region State Tribal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT... James Byrne, 5 Post AmyJean McKeown, 5
Office Square, Post Office Square,
Suite 100 (OSRR07- Suite 100 (OSRR07-
2), Boston, MA 2), Boston, MA
02109-3912, Phone 02109-3912, Phone
(617) 918-1389 Fax (617) 918-1248 Fax
(617) 918-1294. (617) 918-1294.
2. NJ, NY, PR, VI........... John Struble, 290 Phillip Clappin, 290
Broadway, 18th Broadway, 18th
Floor, New York, NY Floor, New York, NY
10007-1866, Phone 10007-1866, Phone
(212) 637-4291 Fax (212) 637-4431 Fax
(212) 637-3083. (212) 637-3083.
3. DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV... Michael Taurino,
1650 Arch Street
(3HS51),
Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone (215)
814-3371 Fax (215)
814-3274.
4. AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, Cindy Nolan, 61 Olga Perry, 61
SC, TN. Forsyth Street SW., Forsyth Street SW.,
10th Fl (9T25), 10th Fl (9T25),
Atlanta, GA 30303- Atlanta, GA 30303-
8960, Phone (404) 8960, Phone (404)
562-8425 Fax (404) 562-8534 Fax (404)
562-8788. 562-8788.
5. IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI... Jan Pels, 77 West Kirstin Kuenzi, 77
Jackson Boulevard West Jackson
(SB-5J), Chicago, Boulevard (SB-5J),
IL 60604-3507, Chicago, IL 60604-
Phone (312) 886- 3507, Phone (312)
3009 Fax (312) 692- 886-6015 Fax (312)
2161. 697-2075.
6. AR, LA, NM, OK, TX....... Amber Howard, 1445 Freda Hardaway, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite Ross Avenue, Suite
1200 (6SF), Dallas, 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202-2733, TX 75202-2733,
Phone (214) 665- Phone (214) 665-
3172 Fax (214) 665- 8342 Fax (214) 665-
6660. 6660.
7. IA, KS, MO, NE........... Susan Klein, 11201 Jennifer Morris,
Renner Boulevard 11201 Renner
(SUPRSTAR), Lenexa, Boulevard
KS 66219, Phone (SUPRSTAR), Lenexa,
(913) 551-7786 Fax KS 66219, Phone
(913) 551-9786. (913) 551-7341 Fax
(913) 551-9341.
8. CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY... Christina Wilson, Melisa Devincenzi,
1595 Wynkoop Street 1595 Wynkoop Street
(EPR-AR), Denver, (EPR-AR), Denver,
CO 80202-1129, CO 80202-1129,
Phone (303) 312- Phone (303) 312-
6706 Fax (303) 312- 6377 Fax (303) 312-
6065. 6962.
9. AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU, Eugenia Chow, 75 Jose Garcia, Jr.,
MP. Hawthorne St. (SFD- 600 Wilshire Blvd,
6-1), San Suite 1460, Los
Francisco, CA Angeles, CA 90017,
94105, Phone (415) Phone (213) 244-
972-3160 Fax (415) 1811 Fax (213) 244-
947-3520. 1850.
10. AK, ID, OR, WA.......... Mary K. Goolie, 222 Mary K. Goolie, 222
West 7th Avenue #19 West 7th Avenue #19
(AOO), Anchorage, (AOO), Anchorage,
AK 99513 Phone AK 99513 Phone
(907) 271-3414 Fax (907) 271-3414 Fax
(907) 271-3424. (907) 271-3424.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011). Because this action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action
does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This
action does not create new binding legal requirements that
substantially and directly affect Tribes under Executive Order 13175
(63 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action does not have significant
Federalism implications under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001)
or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). This action does not involve technical standards;
thus, the requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before certain actions may take effect, the agency promulgating
the action must submit a report, which includes a copy of the action,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Because this final action does not contain legally
binding requirements, it is not subject to the Congressional Review
Act.
Dated: September 1, 2017.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization, Office of Land
and Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-20436 Filed 9-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P