Indiana Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan, 44313-44317 [2017-20265]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 183 / Friday, September 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
History
On March 23, 2017, the FAA
published in the Federal Register (82
FR 14839) Docket FAA–2016–9588 a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
modify Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Soldotna Airport, Soldotna, AK.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received to the proposed rule.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017,
and effective September 15, 2017, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document amends FAA Order
7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017,
and effective September 15, 2017. FAA
Order 7400.11B is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Rule
This amendment to Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
modifies Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Soldotna Airport, Soldotna, AK. The
segment extending from the 10.1-mile
radius of the airport within 4 miles
either side of the 270° bearing of the
Soldotna NDB is revised from 4 miles to
2.4 miles with the reference to the NDB
changed to the Soldotna Airport.
The segment extending from the 10.1mile radius to 21 miles west of Soldotna
Airport is modified to 11 miles west of
the airport.
The segment within 4 miles south of
the 090° bearing of Soldotna Airport is
revised to 3.5 miles. This action is
necessary because the airspace as
previously configured exceeded the
minimum size required for current
arrivals and departures.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Sep 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
44313
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
mile radius to 11 miles west of the airport,
and within 3.5 miles either side of the 090°
bearing of Soldotna Airport, AK, extending
from the 10.1-mile radius to 14.3 miles east
of the airport; and that airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within a 73-mile radius of Soldotna Airport.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Soldotna, AK [Modified]
Soldotna, Soldotna Airport, AK
(Lat. 60°28′31″ N., long. 151°02′23″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 10.1-mile
radius of the Soldotna Airport and within 2.4
miles either side of the 270° bearing of
Soldotna Airport, extending from the 10.1-
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
September 14, 2017.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017–20042 Filed 9–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 914
[SATS No. IN–164–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2016–0004; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
178S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 17XS501520]
Indiana Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Indiana Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation (AML) Plan (Indiana Plan)
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Updates to the Indiana Plan were
proposed to be consistent with changes
required by the 2006 amendment to
SMCRA.
DATES: Effective October 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Len
V. Meier, Chief, Alton Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 501 Belle Street, Suite
216, Alton, IL 62002–6169. Telephone:
(618) 463–6463. Email: lmeier@
osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background on the Indiana Plan
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Indiana Plan
The Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Program (AML) was
established by Title IV of the Act, in
response to concerns over extensive
environmental damage caused by past
coal mining activities. The program is
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
44314
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 183 / Friday, September 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
funded by a reclamation fee collected on
each ton of coal that is produced. The
money collected is used to finance the
reclamation of abandoned coal mines
and for other authorized activities.
Section 405 of the Act allows States and
Indian Tribes to assume exclusive
responsibility for reclamation activity
within the State or on Indian lands if
they develop and submit, to the
Secretary of the Interior for approval, a
program (often referred to as a Plan) for
the reclamation of abandoned coal
mines. You can find background
information on the Indiana Plan,
including the Secretary’s findings, the
disposition of comments, and the
approval of the Plan in the July 26,
1982, Federal Register (47 FR 32108).
You can find later actions concerning
the Indiana Plan and amendments to the
Indiana Plan at 30 CFR 914.20 and
914.25.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated March 14, 2016
(Administrative Record No. IN–1773),
Indiana sent OSMRE an amendment to
the Indiana Plan at its own initiative.
On July 14, 2016, we announced
receipt of the proposed amendment in
the Federal Register (81 FR 45425). In
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the adequacy of the
amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one
requested one. The public comment
period ended on August 15, 2016. We
did not receive any public comments.
III. OSMRE’s Findings
We are approving the amendment as
described below. The following are the
findings we made concerning Indiana’s
amendment under SMCRA and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 884.14
and 884.15. Any revisions that we do
not specifically discuss below
concerning non-substantive wording or
editorial changes can be found in the
full text of the Plan amendment
available at www.regulations.gov.
Indiana Plan
1. Letter of Designation From the
Governor [30 CFR 884.13(a)(1)]
Indiana resubmitted a 1981 letter from
the Governor designating the Indiana
Department of Natural Resources
(Indiana DNR) as the agency responsible
for the abandoned mine lands
reclamation program in the state of
Indiana. This letter was submitted and
approved as part of the original
proposed Indiana Plan and is consistent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Sep 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(1).
2. Legal Opinion [30 CFR 884.13(a)(2)]
Indiana resubmitted a 1981 legal
opinion from the Attorney General of
Indiana authorizing the Indiana DNR,
under the legal authority of the Indiana
Code, to conduct its reclamation
program in accordance with the
requirements of Title IV of the Act. This
legal opinion was submitted and
approved as part of the original
proposed Indiana Plan and is consistent
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(2).
3. Goals and Objectives [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(i)]
Part 884.13(c)(1) of the Indiana Plan,
states that the goal of its AML program
is to address the adverse effects of past
coal mining conducted prior to August
3, 1977, which impact public health,
safety, or general welfare, and cause
environmental degradation. The stated
objectives of the AML program are to
identify and prioritize these adverse
impacts, provide planning procedures,
and ensure their ultimate reclamation.
Indiana also stated that, although the
primary purpose of the program is the
reclamation of coal mine lands, any
non-coal AML issues will be dealt with
in accordance with OSMRE policies.
Indiana DNR sets aside a percentage of
each year’s allocation of AML funds into
separate funds for both the restoration of
eligible lands and waters and for the
abatement of the causes and treatment
of the effects of acid mine drainage.
Both funds are used in accordance with
the requirements and priorities of
SMCRA. These program goals and
objectives are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(i). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
4. Reclamation Project Ranking and
Selection Procedures [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(ii)]
Part 884.13(c)(2) of the Indiana Plan,
describes the priority system and the
specific criteria for identifying and
ranking all sites eligible for reclamation
under Title IV of the Act. Examples of
eligible site problems include: Open and
unprotected mine entries; water filled,
or partially filled shafts; dangerous
highwalls and other steep
embankments; hazardous mine
structures; underground mine
subsidence; trash dumps; water bodies
impaired by coal mine drainage; coal
refuse areas; spoil areas; and any other
mine related danger. The sites given
highest priority are those exhibiting
extreme danger of adverse effects of coal
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
mining practices. The sites given the
second highest priority are those
adversely impacting public health and
safety. The sites given third priority are
those which cause the environmental
degradation of soil, water, air quality,
woodlands, fish and wildlife,
recreational resources, and agricultural
productivity. Indiana also describes
Indiana DNR’s data acquisition
procedures in determining site
eligibility, which include the review of
past mining records, surveys, field
investigations, and public input.
Indiana explains that site priority will
be determined for all eligible sites,
regardless of resource recovery
potential, and that any resource
recovery will be undertaken in
accordance with Federal rules. Any
remined sites will remain eligible for
AML reclamation. Part 884.13(e)(1)(2) of
the Indiana Plan, includes a list of
documents and data sources concerning
known or suspected eligible lands and
waters within the state of Indiana. These
descriptions are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(ii). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
5. Coordination With Other Programs
[30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iii)]
Part 884.13(c)(3) of the Indiana Plan
describes Indiana DNR’s coordination
with other agencies. Indiana DNR
coordinates with the Sycamore Trails
Resource Conservation & Development
Group, a non-profit organization that
maintains its own AML program. The
two programs share information via a
liaison and an Abandoned Mine Land
Inventory System database, which lists
sites identified by personnel from both
programs. Eligibility of these potential
sites for the expenditure of AML funds
is determined by committee review.
Additional coordination with local
tribes is not necessary because there are
no known Indian lands within the
Indiana Coal Region. Indiana also
describes the purpose of its AML
Emergency Program, which is to
stabilize the emergency aspects of an
AML problem by eliminating the
immediate danger to public health,
safety, or general welfare. The AML
Emergency Program is discussed further
in Section 8, ‘‘Rights of Entry.’’ This
description of agency coordination is
consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iii).
Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
6. Land Acquisition, Management, and
Disposal [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iv)]
Part 884.13(c)(4) of the Indiana Plan
describes its policies and procedures
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 183 / Friday, September 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
regarding land acquisition,
management, and disposal. Under the
Indiana Plan, all lands that have been
adversely affected by coal mining
activity are eligible for acquisition, if
deemed necessary. These acquisition,
management, and disposition policies
and procedures are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(iv). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
7. Reclamation of Private Land [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(v)]
Part 884.13(c)(5) of the Indiana Plan
describes Indiana’s policies and
procedures for reclamation on private
land. Under the Indiana Plan, the
Indiana DNR has the authority to place
or waive a lien against private property
if the owner has consented to,
participated in, or exercised control
over the mining operation, and if
reclamation will result in a significant
increase in property value. If an initial
evaluation suggests an increase in
property value of $25,000 or more, the
land appraisal may be conducted by an
independent appraiser. These policies
and procedures are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(v). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
8. Rights of Entry [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(vi)]
Part 884.13(c)(6) and Part 884.13(c)(3)
of the Indiana Plan states its policies
and procedures regarding rights of entry
to lands or property. Indiana DNR will
take all reasonable actions to obtain
advanced written consent from the
property owner for the purposes of
reclamation. In the event that
permission cannot be obtained on
property where reclamation is needed
and there is an immediate danger to
public health, safety, or general welfare,
police power entry is authorized under
the AML Emergency Program. If police
power entry is necessary, a written
notice shall be mailed to the property
owner at least 30 days prior to entry. If
the property owner’s address is not
known, the notice shall be posted on the
property and advertised in the
newspaper. These policies and
procedures are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(vi). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
9. Public Participation Policies [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(vii)]
Part 884.13(c)(7) of the Indiana Plan,
describes its public participation
policies in the development and
operation of the Indiana Plan. Indiana
DNR encourages the public to contact
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Sep 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
their office with any questions or
concerns regarding mining related
problems or the AML program. For
future projects, Indiana DNR distributes
informational letters to Federal, State,
and local elected officials, and
publishes public notices to news outlets
within the county where the proposed
activity is located. If sufficient public
response is received, DNR will offer
public meetings to provide information
on proposed activities. Additional
public involvement in the preparation
of any revisions or amendments to the
Indiana Plan will be coordinated and
executed by OSMRE during the public
comment and review period. These
policies and procedures are consistent
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(vii). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
10. Organization of the Designated
Agency [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(i)]
Part 884.13(d)(1) of the Indiana Plan
describes the organization of the Indiana
DNR and its relationship to other state
organizations that may become involved
in Indiana’s AML program. The Indiana
DNR Division of Reclamation reports to
the DNR Director, via the Deputy
Director to the Regulatory Management
Team. The Indiana DNR Director reports
directly to the Governor. The AML
program also coordinates with other
DNR divisions on proposed projects and
reclamation activities. This description
of agency organization is consistent
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(4)(i). Therefore, we are
approving its inclusion.
11. Personnel Staffing Policies [30 CFR
884.13(a)(4)(ii)]
Part 884.13(d)(2) of the Indiana Plan
describes Indiana’s personnel staffing
policies that will govern the assignment
of personnel to its AML program. The
program’s staff is selected on the basis
of applicable academic and professional
experience. The Indiana DNR will be
responsible for complying with all
pertinent Federal and State laws. This
description of agency personnel policies
is consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(ii).
Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
12. Purchasing and Procurement [30
CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iii)]
Part 884.13(d)(3) of the Indiana Plan
states that the purchasing and
procurement systems used by the
Indiana DNR will be in accordance with
the requirements of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–102, Attachment 0 and the
Uniform Administrative Requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44315
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements
to State and Local Governments (43 CFR
part 12, subpart C). Indiana also
described its AML Applicant/Violator
System, which ensures that no company
owners, director, or major shareholders
bidding on AML federally-funded
projects have any Federal coal mining
violations or state cessation orders that
would render them ineligible. These
systems are consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iii).
Therefore, we are approving their
inclusion.
13. Accounting [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iv)]
Part 884.13(d)(4) of the Indiana Plan
describes Indiana DNR’s accounting
system, including procedures for the
operation of the Indiana Abandoned
Mine Reclamation Fund. AML projects
are grant-funded, and detailed financial
records are maintained for auditing
purposes, in accordance with 30 CFR
886 and OMB Circular A–102. This
system description is consistent with
the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(4)(iv). Therefore, we are
approving its inclusion.
14. Environmental Problems and
Reclamation Techniques [30 CFR
884.13(a)(5)(ii)] [30 CFR
884.13(a)(5)(iii)]
Part 884.13(e)(3) of the Indiana Plan
describes the problems occurring on
known or suspected lands and waters
which require reclamation. A report
published by Indiana DNR describes
these problems and the suggested
reclamation techniques to restore the
site to an environmentally stable
condition. These descriptions are
consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(ii)
and 30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(iii). Therefore,
we are approving their inclusion.
15. The Economic Base [30 CFR
884.13(a)(6)(i)]
Part 884.13(f)(1) of the Indiana Plan,
describes the economic base for
Indiana’s primary coal producing
region, including population size,
market accessibility, economic
activities, such as agricultural products
and manufacturing, and available
mining resources. This description is
consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(i).
Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
16. Significant Aesthetic, Historic, or
Cultural, and Recreational Values [30
CFR 884.13(a)(6)(ii)]
Part 884.13(f)(2) of the Indiana Plan
describes the aesthetic, historic, and
recreational values of southwestern
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
44316
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 183 / Friday, September 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Indiana. Indiana DNR stated that, to
ensure that all potential impacts of the
reclamation process are mitigated, the
Division of Reclamation will consult
with the Division of Historic
Preservation and Archaeology. This
statement is consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(ii).
Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
State Historical Preservation Officer
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
17. Flora and Fauna of Southwestern
Indiana [30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(iii)]
Indiana stated that, during the
planning stages of proposed AML
reclamation projects, evaluations are
conducted by Indiana DNR to determine
the presence of wetlands, endangered
species, and other environmental
concerns. Recommendations are then
provided to enhance or improve
wetlands and critical wildlife habitat.
During this process, Indiana DNR
consults with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service to determine whether the
project will adversely affect any
Federally-listed threatened or
endangered species. Indiana DNR also
coordinates with the Indiana Division of
Nature Preserves to identify any unique
natural habitats for protection and
mitigation. These descriptions are
consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(iii).
Therefore, we are approving their
inclusion.
V. OSMRE’s Decision
18. Locations of Documented Surface
and Underground Coal Mines in
Southwestern Indiana [30 CFR
884.13(a)(5)(i)]
Indiana included a map showing the
general location of known or suspected
eligible lands and waters within Indiana
which require reclamation. This map is
consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(i).
Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
OSMRE solicited public comments
and provided an opportunity for a
public hearing on the amendment of the
Indiana Plan. No public comments were
received and because no one requested
an opportunity to speak at a public
hearing, no hearing was held.
Federal Agency Comments
On May 4, 2016, under 30 CFR
884.14(a)(2), we requested comments on
the amendment from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Indiana plan
(Administrative Record No. IN–1773).
We did not receive any comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Sep 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
On May 4, 2016, we requested
comments on the Indiana Plan
amendment (Administrative Record No.
IN–1773), from the SHPO and the
ACHP, but neither responded to our
request.
Based on the above findings, we
approve the amendment Indiana sent us
on March 14, 2016 (Administrative
Record No. IN–1773).
To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR part 914, which codify decisions
concerning the Indiana Plan. In
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, this rule will take effect
30 days after the date of publication.
Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that
the State’s program demonstrate that the
State has the capability of carrying out
the provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes. SMCRA requires consistency
of State and Federal standards.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rulemaking does not have
takings implications. This
determination is based on the analysis
performed for the counterpart Federal
regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rulemaking is exempted from
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rulemaking
meets the applicable standards of
subsections (a) and (b) of that section.
However, these standards are not
applicable to the actual language of
State AML programs and program
amendments because each program is
drafted and promulgated by a specific
state, not by OSMRE. Under section 405
of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1235) and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 884.14
and 884.15, decisions on proposed State
AML programs and program
amendments submitted by the states
must be based solely on a determination
of whether the submittal is consistent
with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
other requirements of 30 CFR part 884
have been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
Federalism implications. SMCRA
delineates the roles of the Federal and
state governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that state laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that state programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rulemaking on Federallyrecognized Tribes and have determined
that the rulemaking does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Tribes. The basis for
this determination is that our decision
is on a state AML program and does not
involve Federal regulations involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
2001, requires agencies to prepare a
Statement of Energy Effects for a
rulemaking that is (1) considered
significant under Executive Order
12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rulemaking is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because it is deemed a categorical
exclusion within the meaning of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). It is documented in
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 183 / Friday, September 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
the DOI Departmental Manual 516 DM
13.5(B)(29), that agency decisions on
approval of state reclamation plans for
abandoned mine lands do not constitute
major Federal actions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rulemaking,
is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an economic
analysis was prepared and certification
made that such regulations would not
have a significant economic effect upon
a substantial number of small entities.
In making the determination as to
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the
Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Original amendment submission
date
*
*
March 14, 2016 ..............................
Unfunded Mandates
This rulemaking will not impose an
unfunded mandate on state, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rulemaking, is
based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was
prepared and a determination made that
the Federal regulation did not impose
an unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 914
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Alfred L. Clayborne,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 914 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 914—INDIANA
1. The authority citation for part 914
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 914.25 is amended in the
table by adding an entry in
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 914.25 Approval of Indiana abandoned
mine land reclamation plan amendments.
*
*
*
*
*
Citation/description
*
*
*
*
*
September 22, 2017 ...................... Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan for the State of Indiana.
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0865]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Napa River, Vallejo, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Mare Island
Drawbridge across the Napa River, mile
2.8 at Vallejo, CA. The deviation is
necessary to allow the community to
participate in the Waterfront Weekend
SUMMARY:
18:27 Sep 21, 2017
This rulemaking is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This rulemaking: (a) Does
not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices
for consumers, individual industries,
Federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and (c)
Does not have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal, which is
the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rulemaking.
Date of final publication
[FR Doc. 2017–20265 Filed 9–21–17; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
44317
Jkt 241001
Triathlon. This deviation allows the
bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position during the deviation
period.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
8 a.m. through 11:30 a.m. on October 8,
2017.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, USCG–2017–0865, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner,
Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 510–437–
3516; email Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City
of Vallejo has requested a temporary
change to the operation of the Mare
Island Drawbridge, mile 2.8, over Napa
River, at Vallejo, CA. The drawbridge
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
navigation span provides a vertical
clearance of 13 feet above Mean High
Water in the closed-to-navigation
position. The draw operates as required
by 33 CFR 117.169(a). Navigation on the
waterway is commercial and
recreational.
The drawspan will be secured in the
closed-to-navigation position from 8
a.m. through 11:30 a.m. on October 8,
2017 to allow the community to
participate in the Waterfront Weekend
Triathlon. This temporary deviation has
been coordinated with the waterway
users. No objections to the proposed
temporary deviation were raised.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridge in the closed position may do so
at any time. The bridge will be able to
open for emergencies and there is no
immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. The Coast Guard will also inform
the users of the waterway through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44313-44317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20265]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 914
[SATS No. IN-164-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2016-0004; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 178S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 17XS501520]
Indiana Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Indiana Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation (AML) Plan (Indiana Plan) under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Updates to the Indiana
Plan were proposed to be consistent with changes required by the 2006
amendment to SMCRA.
DATES: Effective October 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Len V. Meier, Chief, Alton Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 501
Belle Street, Suite 216, Alton, IL 62002-6169. Telephone: (618) 463-
6463. Email: lmeier@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Indiana Plan
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Indiana Plan
The Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program (AML) was established
by Title IV of the Act, in response to concerns over extensive
environmental damage caused by past coal mining activities. The program
is
[[Page 44314]]
funded by a reclamation fee collected on each ton of coal that is
produced. The money collected is used to finance the reclamation of
abandoned coal mines and for other authorized activities. Section 405
of the Act allows States and Indian Tribes to assume exclusive
responsibility for reclamation activity within the State or on Indian
lands if they develop and submit, to the Secretary of the Interior for
approval, a program (often referred to as a Plan) for the reclamation
of abandoned coal mines. You can find background information on the
Indiana Plan, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of
comments, and the approval of the Plan in the July 26, 1982, Federal
Register (47 FR 32108). You can find later actions concerning the
Indiana Plan and amendments to the Indiana Plan at 30 CFR 914.20 and
914.25.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated March 14, 2016 (Administrative Record No. IN-1773),
Indiana sent OSMRE an amendment to the Indiana Plan at its own
initiative.
On July 14, 2016, we announced receipt of the proposed amendment in
the Federal Register (81 FR 45425). In the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public hearing
or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The public comment
period ended on August 15, 2016. We did not receive any public
comments.
III. OSMRE's Findings
We are approving the amendment as described below. The following
are the findings we made concerning Indiana's amendment under SMCRA and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 884.14 and 884.15. Any revisions that
we do not specifically discuss below concerning non-substantive wording
or editorial changes can be found in the full text of the Plan
amendment available at www.regulations.gov.
Indiana Plan
1. Letter of Designation From the Governor [30 CFR 884.13(a)(1)]
Indiana resubmitted a 1981 letter from the Governor designating the
Indiana Department of Natural Resources (Indiana DNR) as the agency
responsible for the abandoned mine lands reclamation program in the
state of Indiana. This letter was submitted and approved as part of the
original proposed Indiana Plan and is consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(1).
2. Legal Opinion [30 CFR 884.13(a)(2)]
Indiana resubmitted a 1981 legal opinion from the Attorney General
of Indiana authorizing the Indiana DNR, under the legal authority of
the Indiana Code, to conduct its reclamation program in accordance with
the requirements of Title IV of the Act. This legal opinion was
submitted and approved as part of the original proposed Indiana Plan
and is consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(2).
3. Goals and Objectives [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(i)]
Part 884.13(c)(1) of the Indiana Plan, states that the goal of its
AML program is to address the adverse effects of past coal mining
conducted prior to August 3, 1977, which impact public health, safety,
or general welfare, and cause environmental degradation. The stated
objectives of the AML program are to identify and prioritize these
adverse impacts, provide planning procedures, and ensure their ultimate
reclamation. Indiana also stated that, although the primary purpose of
the program is the reclamation of coal mine lands, any non-coal AML
issues will be dealt with in accordance with OSMRE policies. Indiana
DNR sets aside a percentage of each year's allocation of AML funds into
separate funds for both the restoration of eligible lands and waters
and for the abatement of the causes and treatment of the effects of
acid mine drainage. Both funds are used in accordance with the
requirements and priorities of SMCRA. These program goals and
objectives are consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(i). Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
4. Reclamation Project Ranking and Selection Procedures [30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(ii)]
Part 884.13(c)(2) of the Indiana Plan, describes the priority
system and the specific criteria for identifying and ranking all sites
eligible for reclamation under Title IV of the Act. Examples of
eligible site problems include: Open and unprotected mine entries;
water filled, or partially filled shafts; dangerous highwalls and other
steep embankments; hazardous mine structures; underground mine
subsidence; trash dumps; water bodies impaired by coal mine drainage;
coal refuse areas; spoil areas; and any other mine related danger. The
sites given highest priority are those exhibiting extreme danger of
adverse effects of coal mining practices. The sites given the second
highest priority are those adversely impacting public health and
safety. The sites given third priority are those which cause the
environmental degradation of soil, water, air quality, woodlands, fish
and wildlife, recreational resources, and agricultural productivity.
Indiana also describes Indiana DNR's data acquisition procedures in
determining site eligibility, which include the review of past mining
records, surveys, field investigations, and public input. Indiana
explains that site priority will be determined for all eligible sites,
regardless of resource recovery potential, and that any resource
recovery will be undertaken in accordance with Federal rules. Any
remined sites will remain eligible for AML reclamation. Part
884.13(e)(1)(2) of the Indiana Plan, includes a list of documents and
data sources concerning known or suspected eligible lands and waters
within the state of Indiana. These descriptions are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(ii). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
5. Coordination With Other Programs [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iii)]
Part 884.13(c)(3) of the Indiana Plan describes Indiana DNR's
coordination with other agencies. Indiana DNR coordinates with the
Sycamore Trails Resource Conservation & Development Group, a non-profit
organization that maintains its own AML program. The two programs share
information via a liaison and an Abandoned Mine Land Inventory System
database, which lists sites identified by personnel from both programs.
Eligibility of these potential sites for the expenditure of AML funds
is determined by committee review. Additional coordination with local
tribes is not necessary because there are no known Indian lands within
the Indiana Coal Region. Indiana also describes the purpose of its AML
Emergency Program, which is to stabilize the emergency aspects of an
AML problem by eliminating the immediate danger to public health,
safety, or general welfare. The AML Emergency Program is discussed
further in Section 8, ``Rights of Entry.'' This description of agency
coordination is consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(3)(iii). Therefore, we are approving its inclusion.
6. Land Acquisition, Management, and Disposal [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iv)]
Part 884.13(c)(4) of the Indiana Plan describes its policies and
procedures
[[Page 44315]]
regarding land acquisition, management, and disposal. Under the Indiana
Plan, all lands that have been adversely affected by coal mining
activity are eligible for acquisition, if deemed necessary. These
acquisition, management, and disposition policies and procedures are
consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(iv).
Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
7. Reclamation of Private Land [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(v)]
Part 884.13(c)(5) of the Indiana Plan describes Indiana's policies
and procedures for reclamation on private land. Under the Indiana Plan,
the Indiana DNR has the authority to place or waive a lien against
private property if the owner has consented to, participated in, or
exercised control over the mining operation, and if reclamation will
result in a significant increase in property value. If an initial
evaluation suggests an increase in property value of $25,000 or more,
the land appraisal may be conducted by an independent appraiser. These
policies and procedures are consistent with the Federal requirements of
30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(v). Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
8. Rights of Entry [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(vi)]
Part 884.13(c)(6) and Part 884.13(c)(3) of the Indiana Plan states
its policies and procedures regarding rights of entry to lands or
property. Indiana DNR will take all reasonable actions to obtain
advanced written consent from the property owner for the purposes of
reclamation. In the event that permission cannot be obtained on
property where reclamation is needed and there is an immediate danger
to public health, safety, or general welfare, police power entry is
authorized under the AML Emergency Program. If police power entry is
necessary, a written notice shall be mailed to the property owner at
least 30 days prior to entry. If the property owner's address is not
known, the notice shall be posted on the property and advertised in the
newspaper. These policies and procedures are consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(vi). Therefore, we are
approving their inclusion.
9. Public Participation Policies [30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(vii)]
Part 884.13(c)(7) of the Indiana Plan, describes its public
participation policies in the development and operation of the Indiana
Plan. Indiana DNR encourages the public to contact their office with
any questions or concerns regarding mining related problems or the AML
program. For future projects, Indiana DNR distributes informational
letters to Federal, State, and local elected officials, and publishes
public notices to news outlets within the county where the proposed
activity is located. If sufficient public response is received, DNR
will offer public meetings to provide information on proposed
activities. Additional public involvement in the preparation of any
revisions or amendments to the Indiana Plan will be coordinated and
executed by OSMRE during the public comment and review period. These
policies and procedures are consistent with the Federal requirements of
30 CFR 884.13(a)(3)(vii). Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
10. Organization of the Designated Agency [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(i)]
Part 884.13(d)(1) of the Indiana Plan describes the organization of
the Indiana DNR and its relationship to other state organizations that
may become involved in Indiana's AML program. The Indiana DNR Division
of Reclamation reports to the DNR Director, via the Deputy Director to
the Regulatory Management Team. The Indiana DNR Director reports
directly to the Governor. The AML program also coordinates with other
DNR divisions on proposed projects and reclamation activities. This
description of agency organization is consistent with the Federal
requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(i). Therefore, we are approving its
inclusion.
11. Personnel Staffing Policies [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(ii)]
Part 884.13(d)(2) of the Indiana Plan describes Indiana's personnel
staffing policies that will govern the assignment of personnel to its
AML program. The program's staff is selected on the basis of applicable
academic and professional experience. The Indiana DNR will be
responsible for complying with all pertinent Federal and State laws.
This description of agency personnel policies is consistent with the
Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(ii). Therefore, we are
approving its inclusion.
12. Purchasing and Procurement [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iii)]
Part 884.13(d)(3) of the Indiana Plan states that the purchasing
and procurement systems used by the Indiana DNR will be in accordance
with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A-102, Attachment 0 and the Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Governments (43 CFR part 12, subpart C). Indiana also described its AML
Applicant/Violator System, which ensures that no company owners,
director, or major shareholders bidding on AML federally-funded
projects have any Federal coal mining violations or state cessation
orders that would render them ineligible. These systems are consistent
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iii). Therefore,
we are approving their inclusion.
13. Accounting [30 CFR 884.13(a)(4)(iv)]
Part 884.13(d)(4) of the Indiana Plan describes Indiana DNR's
accounting system, including procedures for the operation of the
Indiana Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund. AML projects are grant-funded,
and detailed financial records are maintained for auditing purposes, in
accordance with 30 CFR 886 and OMB Circular A-102. This system
description is consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(4)(iv). Therefore, we are approving its inclusion.
14. Environmental Problems and Reclamation Techniques [30 CFR
884.13(a)(5)(ii)] [30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(iii)]
Part 884.13(e)(3) of the Indiana Plan describes the problems
occurring on known or suspected lands and waters which require
reclamation. A report published by Indiana DNR describes these problems
and the suggested reclamation techniques to restore the site to an
environmentally stable condition. These descriptions are consistent
with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(ii) and 30 CFR
884.13(a)(5)(iii). Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
15. The Economic Base [30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(i)]
Part 884.13(f)(1) of the Indiana Plan, describes the economic base
for Indiana's primary coal producing region, including population size,
market accessibility, economic activities, such as agricultural
products and manufacturing, and available mining resources. This
description is consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR
884.13(a)(6)(i). Therefore, we are approving its inclusion.
16. Significant Aesthetic, Historic, or Cultural, and Recreational
Values [30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(ii)]
Part 884.13(f)(2) of the Indiana Plan describes the aesthetic,
historic, and recreational values of southwestern
[[Page 44316]]
Indiana. Indiana DNR stated that, to ensure that all potential impacts
of the reclamation process are mitigated, the Division of Reclamation
will consult with the Division of Historic Preservation and
Archaeology. This statement is consistent with the Federal requirements
of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(ii). Therefore, we are approving its inclusion.
17. Flora and Fauna of Southwestern Indiana [30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(iii)]
Indiana stated that, during the planning stages of proposed AML
reclamation projects, evaluations are conducted by Indiana DNR to
determine the presence of wetlands, endangered species, and other
environmental concerns. Recommendations are then provided to enhance or
improve wetlands and critical wildlife habitat. During this process,
Indiana DNR consults with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to
determine whether the project will adversely affect any Federally-
listed threatened or endangered species. Indiana DNR also coordinates
with the Indiana Division of Nature Preserves to identify any unique
natural habitats for protection and mitigation. These descriptions are
consistent with the Federal requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(a)(6)(iii).
Therefore, we are approving their inclusion.
18. Locations of Documented Surface and Underground Coal Mines in
Southwestern Indiana [30 CFR 884.13(a)(5)(i)]
Indiana included a map showing the general location of known or
suspected eligible lands and waters within Indiana which require
reclamation. This map is consistent with the Federal requirements of 30
CFR 884.13(a)(5)(i). Therefore, we are approving its inclusion.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
OSMRE solicited public comments and provided an opportunity for a
public hearing on the amendment of the Indiana Plan. No public comments
were received and because no one requested an opportunity to speak at a
public hearing, no hearing was held.
Federal Agency Comments
On May 4, 2016, under 30 CFR 884.14(a)(2), we requested comments on
the amendment from various Federal agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Indiana plan (Administrative Record No. IN-1773). We
did not receive any comments.
State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
On May 4, 2016, we requested comments on the Indiana Plan amendment
(Administrative Record No. IN-1773), from the SHPO and the ACHP, but
neither responded to our request.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we approve the amendment Indiana sent
us on March 14, 2016 (Administrative Record No. IN-1773).
To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR part 914, which codify decisions concerning the Indiana Plan.
In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, this rule will
take effect 30 days after the date of publication. Section 503(a) of
SMCRA requires that the State's program demonstrate that the State has
the capability of carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting
its purposes. SMCRA requires consistency of State and Federal
standards.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rulemaking does not have takings implications. This
determination is based on the analysis performed for the counterpart
Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rulemaking is exempted from review by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this
rulemaking meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of
that section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State AML programs and program amendments because each
program is drafted and promulgated by a specific state, not by OSMRE.
Under section 405 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1235) and the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR 884.14 and 884.15, decisions on proposed State AML programs
and program amendments submitted by the states must be based solely on
a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other requirements
of 30 CFR part 884 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rulemaking does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA
delineates the roles of the Federal and state governments with regard
to the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
One of the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to
protect society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface
coal mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that
state laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be
``in accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that state programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rulemaking on Federally-recognized Tribes and
have determined that the rulemaking does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
government and Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal government and Tribes. The basis
for this determination is that our decision is on a state AML program
and does not involve Federal regulations involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001, requires agencies to prepare
a Statement of Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered
significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Because this rulemaking is exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because it is deemed a categorical exclusion within the meaning of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). It is
documented in
[[Page 44317]]
the DOI Departmental Manual 516 DM 13.5(B)(29), that agency decisions
on approval of state reclamation plans for abandoned mine lands do not
constitute major Federal actions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rulemaking will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rulemaking is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rulemaking:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b)
Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, state, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and
a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rulemaking.
Unfunded Mandates
This rulemaking will not impose an unfunded mandate on state,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or
more in any given year. This determination is based upon the fact that
the State submittal, which is the subject of this rulemaking, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared
and a determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 914
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Alfred L. Clayborne,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 914 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 914--INDIANA
0
1. The authority citation for part 914 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 914.25 is amended in the table by adding an entry in
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 914.25 Approval of Indiana abandoned mine land reclamation plan
amendments.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final
date publication Citation/description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
March 14, 2016................ September 22, Abandoned Mine Land
2017. Reclamation Plan for
the State of
Indiana.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-20265 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P