Approval of Kansas Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Construction Permits and Approvals Program, 44103-44105 [2017-20073]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804,
however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of
particular applicability; rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and
rules of agency organization, procedure,
or practice that do not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because
this is a rule of particular applicability,
EPA is not required to submit a rule
report regarding this action under
section 801.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 20,
2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
44103
■
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 7, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart OO—Rhode Island
2. In § 52.2070, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by:
■ a. Removing the entry ‘‘TillotsonPearson in Warren, Rhode Island’’.
■ b. Adding the entry ‘‘US Watercraft,
LLC in Warren, Rhode Island’’ to the
end of the table.
The addition reads as follows:
§ 52.2070
*
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED RHODE ISLAND SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Name of source
Permit No.
State effective date
EPA approval date
*
US Watercraft, LLC in Warren, Rhode Island.
*
*
File No. 01–05–AP ...........
*
7/16/2003 and 2/11/2004 ..
*
*
9/21/2017, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
*
*
permitting program fee structure and
schedule; and make minor revisions and
corrections. Approval of these revisions
will not impact air quality, ensures
consistency between the State and
Federally-approved rules, and ensures
Federal enforceability of the State’s
rules.
*
[FR Doc. 2017–20164 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0512; FRL–9967–97–
Region 7]
Approval of Kansas Air Quality State
Implementation Plans; Construction
Permits and Approvals Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2017–0512, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
ADDRESSES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP)
and the 112(l) program. The submission
revises Kansas’ construction permit
rules. Specifically, these revisions
implement the revised National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for fine particulate matter; clarify and
refine applicable criteria for sources
subject to the construction permitting
program; update the construction
SUMMARY:
This direct final rule will be
effective November 20, 2017, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by October 23, 2017.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanations
*
VOC RACT approval and
amendment.
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Bredehoft, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7164, or by email at
bredehoft.deborah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What part 52 revision is EPA approving?
III. What 112(l) revision is EPA approving?
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
44104
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Incorporation by reference
VII. Statutory and Executive Order reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve revisions to the Kansas SIP and
112(l) program submission received on
December 5, 2016. The SIP submission
requests revisions to K.A.R. 28–19–300
that include: Implementing revisions to
include fine particulate matter (PM2.5) to
implement the prevention of significant
deterioration permitting component of
section 110(a)(2)(C) for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, pursuant to EPA’s
NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule (2008
NSR Rule), (73 FR 28321, May 16,
2008); clarifying and refining
applicability criteria for sources subject
to construction permitting program by
proposing the following: (1) Eliminating
the requirements for all Title IV Acid
Rain sources to obtain construction
permits that would not have otherwise
been required; (2) clarifing the
construction review requirements for
sources emitting hazardous air
pollutants, or sources subject to
standards promulgated by the USEPA;
(3) eliminating the requirement for
sources to obtain an approval solely due
to being subject to standards
promulgated by the EPA without regard
to emissions for insignificant activities;
and making minor revisions and
corrections. The SIP submission also
requests revisions to K.A.R. 28–19–304
that include: (1) Updating the
construction permitting program fee
structure from an estimated capital cost
mechanism to one based on complexity
of source and permit type and (2)
updating the fee schedule to bring in
sufficient revenue to adequately
administer the Kansas Air Quality Act.
The SIP submission also makes minor
revisions and corrections.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
II. What part 52 revision is EPA
approving?
EPA is approving requested revisions
to the Kansas SIP relating to the
following:
• Construction Permits and
Approvals. Kansas Administrative
Regulations 28–19–300. Applicability;
and
• Construction Permits and
Approvals. Kansas Administrative
Regulations 28–19–304. Fees.
EPA has conducted analysis on the
state’s revisions and has found that the
revisions would not impact air quality,
ensures consistency between the state
and Federally-approved rules, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
ensures Federal enforceability of the
State’s rules. Additional information on
the EPA’s analysis can be found in the
Technical Support Document (TSD)
included in this docket.
III. What 112(l) revision is EPA
approving?
EPA is also taking direct final action
to approve a portion of K.A.R. 28–19–
300 under the 112(l) program pursuant
to 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, as
requested by the State of Kansas on
April 19, 2017. The State of Kansas is
requesting that the applicable portions
of K.A.R. 28–19–300 pertaining to
limiting the potential-to-emit hazardous
air pollutants (HAPs) be approved under
CAA 112(l) and 40 CFR part 63, subpart
E, in addition to being approved under
the SIP.1 Specifically, K.A.R. 28–19–
300(a)(2) and (3) as well as K.A.R. 28–
19–300(b)(4) through (6) are also
approved under CAA section 112(l)
because they require permits or
approvals for hazardous air pollutants
that may limit the potential-to-emit
hazardous air pollutants by establishing
permit conditions that are Federallyenforceable.
IV. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, as
explained above and in more detail in
the technical support document which
is part of this docket, the revision meets
the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and and
implementing regulations.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to
amend the Kansas SIP and 112(l)
program by approving the State’s
request to amend K.A.R. 28–19–300
Construction Permits and Approvals—
Applicability and to amend the Kansas
SIP by approving K.A.R. 28–19–304
Construction Permits and Approvals—
Fees. Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between state and
Federally-approved rules. The EPA has
determined that these changes will not
adversely impact air quality.
We are publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
1 State Implementation Plan provisions approved
under section 110 of the Clean Air Act are for
criteria pollutants. Sections related to hazardous air
pollutants are approved under section 112 of the
Clean Air Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
no adverse comment. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to approve the SIP and
112(l) program revision, if adverse
comments are received on this direct
final rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information about commenting on this
rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this
document. If EPA receives adverse
comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that this direct
final rule will not take effect. We will
address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of the Kansas Regulations
described in the direct final
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 7 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
State implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully Federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.2
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
2 62
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
21SER1
44105
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 20, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this direct final rule
does not affect the finality of this action
for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 8, 2017.
Cathy Stepp,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart R—Kansas
2. In § 52.870, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
‘‘K.A.R. 28–19–300’’ and ‘‘K.A.R. 28–
19–304’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.870
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED KANSAS REGULATIONS
Kansas citation
Title
State effective date
EPA approval date
Explanation
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Construction Permits and Approvals
Applicability .........................
11/18/16 ..............................
9/21/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
*
K.A.R. 28–19–304 ................ Fees ....................................
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
K.A.R. 28–19–300 ................
*
11/18/16 ..............................
*
*
9/21/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–20073 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44103-44105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0512; FRL-9967-97-Region 7]
Approval of Kansas Air Quality State Implementation Plans;
Construction Permits and Approvals Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the Kansas State Implementation Plan
(SIP) and the 112(l) program. The submission revises Kansas'
construction permit rules. Specifically, these revisions implement the
revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine
particulate matter; clarify and refine applicable criteria for sources
subject to the construction permitting program; update the construction
permitting program fee structure and schedule; and make minor revisions
and corrections. Approval of these revisions will not impact air
quality, ensures consistency between the State and Federally-approved
rules, and ensures Federal enforceability of the State's rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective November 20, 2017,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by October
23, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2017-0512, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Bredehoft, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7164, or by email at
bredehoft.deborah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What part 52 revision is EPA approving?
III. What 112(l) revision is EPA approving?
[[Page 44104]]
IV. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Incorporation by reference
VII. Statutory and Executive Order reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Kansas SIP and 112(l) program submission received on December 5, 2016.
The SIP submission requests revisions to K.A.R. 28-19-300 that include:
Implementing revisions to include fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) to implement the prevention of significant
deterioration permitting component of section 110(a)(2)(C) for the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, pursuant to EPA's NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule (2008 NSR Rule), (73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008);
clarifying and refining applicability criteria for sources subject to
construction permitting program by proposing the following: (1)
Eliminating the requirements for all Title IV Acid Rain sources to
obtain construction permits that would not have otherwise been
required; (2) clarifing the construction review requirements for
sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, or sources subject to
standards promulgated by the USEPA; (3) eliminating the requirement for
sources to obtain an approval solely due to being subject to standards
promulgated by the EPA without regard to emissions for insignificant
activities; and making minor revisions and corrections. The SIP
submission also requests revisions to K.A.R. 28-19-304 that include:
(1) Updating the construction permitting program fee structure from an
estimated capital cost mechanism to one based on complexity of source
and permit type and (2) updating the fee schedule to bring in
sufficient revenue to adequately administer the Kansas Air Quality Act.
The SIP submission also makes minor revisions and corrections.
II. What part 52 revision is EPA approving?
EPA is approving requested revisions to the Kansas SIP relating to
the following:
Construction Permits and Approvals. Kansas Administrative
Regulations 28-19-300. Applicability; and
Construction Permits and Approvals. Kansas Administrative
Regulations 28-19-304. Fees.
EPA has conducted analysis on the state's revisions and has found
that the revisions would not impact air quality, ensures consistency
between the state and Federally-approved rules, and ensures Federal
enforceability of the State's rules. Additional information on the
EPA's analysis can be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD)
included in this docket.
III. What 112(l) revision is EPA approving?
EPA is also taking direct final action to approve a portion of
K.A.R. 28-19-300 under the 112(l) program pursuant to 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, as requested by the State of Kansas on April 19, 2017. The
State of Kansas is requesting that the applicable portions of K.A.R.
28-19-300 pertaining to limiting the potential-to-emit hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) be approved under CAA 112(l) and 40 CFR part 63,
subpart E, in addition to being approved under the SIP.\1\
Specifically, K.A.R. 28-19-300(a)(2) and (3) as well as K.A.R. 28-19-
300(b)(4) through (6) are also approved under CAA section 112(l)
because they require permits or approvals for hazardous air pollutants
that may limit the potential-to-emit hazardous air pollutants by
establishing permit conditions that are Federally-enforceable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ State Implementation Plan provisions approved under section
110 of the Clean Air Act are for criteria pollutants. Sections
related to hazardous air pollutants are approved under section 112
of the Clean Air Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and and
implementing regulations.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to amend the Kansas SIP and
112(l) program by approving the State's request to amend K.A.R. 28-19-
300 Construction Permits and Approvals--Applicability and to amend the
Kansas SIP by approving K.A.R. 28-19-304 Construction Permits and
Approvals--Fees. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency
between state and Federally-approved rules. The EPA has determined that
these changes will not adversely impact air quality.
We are publishing this direct final rule without a prior proposed
rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposed rule to approve the SIP and 112(l) program revision, if
adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further
information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of
this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that
this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Kansas
Regulations described in the direct final amendments to 40 CFR part 52
set forth below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the For
Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference
by EPA into that plan, are fully Federally enforceable under sections
110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Statutory and Executive Order reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
[[Page 44105]]
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 20, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this direct final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 8, 2017.
Cathy Stepp,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart R--Kansas
0
2. In Sec. 52.870, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries ``K.A.R. 28-19-300'' and ``K.A.R. 28-19-304'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Kansas Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective EPA approval
Kansas citation Title date date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction Permits and Approvals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K.A.R. 28-19-300............. Applicability... 11/18/16........ 9/21/17, [insert ...........................
Federal
Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
K.A.R. 28-19-304............. Fees............ 11/18/16........ 9/21/17, [insert ...........................
Federal
Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-20073 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P