Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South Thomaston, ME, 44075-44077 [2017-20068]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0791]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South
Thomaston, ME
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable waters within 50-yards of
either side of the Route 73 Weskeag
Bridge, at mile 0.1 on the Weskeag
River, in South Thomaston, Maine. The
safety zone is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the potential hazards
created by the demolition, subsequent
removal, and replacement of the Route
73 Weskeag Bridge. When enforced, this
regulation prohibits entry of vessels or
people into the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP), Sector Northern New England
or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from
October 1, 2017 through December 1,
2017.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0791 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Northern New England,
telephone 207–347–5015, email
Matthew.T.Odom@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On July 27, 2017, Sector Northern
New England was made aware of the
Route 73 Weskeag Bridge replacement
project, which spans the Weskeag River
in South Thomaston, Maine. The COTP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
Sector Northern New England has
determined that the potential hazards
associated with the bridge replacement
project will be a safety concern for
anyone within the work area.
The project is scheduled to begin on
October 1, 2017 and be completed by
December 1, 2017. During this project,
removal and replacement of the bridge
will take place. No vessel or person will
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The safety zone will be enforced during
different periods during the bridge
demolition or when other hazards to
navigation arise during the new bridge
construction. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
marine channel 16 (VHF–FM) 24 hours
in advance to any period of enforcement
or as soon as practicable in response to
an emergency. If the project is
completed prior to December 1, 2017,
enforcement of the safety zone will be
suspended and notice given via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
NPRM with respect to this rule because
doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The late
finalization of project details did not
give the Coast Guard enough time to
publish an NPRM, take public
comments, and issue a final rule before
the construction work is set to begin. It
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest to delay
promulgating this rule as it is necessary
to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with the bridge
replacement project beginning on
October 1, 2017.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For
reasons stated in the preceding
paragraph, delaying the implementation
of this rule would be impractical.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The legal basis for this temporary rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP Sector
Northern New England has determined
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44075
that potential hazards associated with
the bridge replacement project starting
on October 1, 2017 and continuing
through December 1, 2017 will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
work zone. This rule is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment within the safety
zone while the bridge replacement
project is completed.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from October 1, 2017 through December
1, 2017. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters from surface to bottom
of 50 yards to either side of the Weskeag
Bridge. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect people, vessels, and
the marine environment in these
navigable waters during the bridge
replacement project. When enforced, no
vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
The Coast Guard will notify the
public and local mariners of this safety
zone through appropriate means, which
may include, but are not limited to,
publication in the Federal Register, the
Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via marine Channel
16 (VHF–FM) in advance of any
scheduled enforcement period. The
regulatory text we are enforcing appears
at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
order 13771.
The Coast Guard has determined that
this rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action for the following
reasons: (1) The safety zone only
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
44076
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
impacts a small designated area of the
Weskeag River, (2) the zone will only be
enforced when work equipment will be
placed in the navigable channel during
removal and replacement of the bridge
or if necessitated by an emergency, (3)
persons or vessels desiring to enter the
safety zone may do so with permission
from the COTP Sector Northern New
England or a designated representative.
The Coast Guard will notify the public
of the enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A., this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone that will prohibit
entry within 50 yards of the Weskeag
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bridge during its removal and
replacement. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A Record of Environmental
Consideration for Categorically
Excluded Actions will be available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0791 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0791 Safety Zone—Route 73
Weskeag Bridge, Weskeag River, South
Thomaston, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone. All navigable waters of the
Weskeag River, ME within a 50-yard
radius of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge
that spans the Weskeag River in South
Thomaston, ME in position 44°03′06″ N,
069°07′33″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This rule will be effective on October 1,
2017, through December 1, 2017, but
will only be enforced during removal
and replacement of the Route 73
Weskeag Bridge or other instances
which may cause a hazard to navigation,
when deemed necessary by the Captain
of the Port (COTP), Northern New
England.
(c) Regulations. When this safety zone
is enforced, the following regulations,
along with those contained in § 165.23
apply:
(1) No person or vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone without the
permission of the Captain of the Port
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(COTP) or a COTP representative.
However, any vessel that is granted
permission by the COTP or a COTP
representative must proceed through the
area with caution and operate at a speed
no faster than that speed necessary to
maintain a safe course, unless otherwise
required by the Navigation Rules.
(2) Any person or vessel permitted to
enter the safety zone shall comply with
the directions and orders of the COTP
or a COTP representative. Upon being
hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by
siren, radio, flashing lights, or other
means, the operator of a vessel within
the zone shall proceed as directed. Any
person or vessel within the safety zone
shall exit the zone when directed by the
COTP or a COTP representative.
(3) To obtain permissions required by
this regulation, individuals may reach
the COTP or a COTP representative via
Channel 16 (VHF–FM) or (207) 741–
5465 (Sector Northern New England
Command Center).
(d) Penalties. Those who violate this
section are subject to the penalties set
forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
(e) Notification. Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England will give notice
through the Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners for the
purpose of enforcement of temporary
safety zone. Sector Northern New
England will also notify the public to
the greatest extent possible of any
period in which the Coast Guard will
suspend enforcement of this safety zone.
(f) COTP representative. A COTP
representative may be any Coast Guard
commissioned, or petty officer or any
federal, state, or local law enforcement
officer who has been designated by the
COTP to act on the COTP’s behalf. A
COTP representative may be on a Coast
Guard vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel, a state or local law enforcement
vessel, or a location on shore.
Dated: September 15, 2017.
M.A. Baroody,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2017–20068 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0731]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Mississippi River, New
Orleans, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters on the Mississippi
River between mile marker (MM) 96.0
and MM 96.5. This action is necessary
to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters near New Orleans, LA,
during a fireworks display. Entry of
vessels or persons into this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
(COTP) or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:50
p.m. to 8:50 p.m. on October 28, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0731 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Commander (LCDR) Howard Vacco,
Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard;
at (504) 365–2281, email
Howard.K.Vacco@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector New
Orleans
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard preceded this final
rule with a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM). The NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
August 23, 2017, (82 FR 39972). We
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to work on
power lines extending over the
Mississippi River in New Orleans, LA.
The NPRM listed dates and times of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Sep 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44077
enforcement of the safety zone. During
the comment period that ended
September 7, 2017, we received one
comment.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the fireworks
display from 7:50 p.m. to 8:50 p.m. on
October 28, 2017 will present a safety
concern for all navigable waters on the
Mississippi River from mile marker
(MM) 96.0 and MM 96.5. The purpose
of this rule is to ensure safety of life and
vessels on the navigable waters in the
safety zone before, during, and after the
scheduled event.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
During the comment period, one
comment was received. The commenter
made a general statement that he or she
was against ‘‘safe spaces’’. The
commenter did not indicate if he or she
was against the proposed safety zone or
the reasons for it. There are no changes
in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
The rule establishes a safety zone
from 7:50 p.m. through 8:50 p.m. on
October 28, 2017. The safety zone
would cover all navigable waters
between MM 96.0 and 96.5 on the
Mississippi River in New Orleans, LA.
The duration of the zone is intended to
ensure the safety of life and vessels on
these navigable waters before, during,
and after the scheduled fireworks
display. Entry into this safety zone is
prohibited without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44075-44077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20068]
[[Page 44075]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0791]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South Thomaston, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable waters within 50-yards of either side of the Route 73
Weskeag Bridge, at mile 0.1 on the Weskeag River, in South Thomaston,
Maine. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from the potential hazards created by the
demolition, subsequent removal, and replacement of the Route 73 Weskeag
Bridge. When enforced, this regulation prohibits entry of vessels or
people into the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP), Sector Northern New England or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from October 1, 2017 through December 1,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0791 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, telephone 207-347-5015, email
Matthew.T.Odom@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On July 27, 2017, Sector Northern New England was made aware of the
Route 73 Weskeag Bridge replacement project, which spans the Weskeag
River in South Thomaston, Maine. The COTP Sector Northern New England
has determined that the potential hazards associated with the bridge
replacement project will be a safety concern for anyone within the work
area.
The project is scheduled to begin on October 1, 2017 and be
completed by December 1, 2017. During this project, removal and
replacement of the bridge will take place. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. The safety zone will be
enforced during different periods during the bridge demolition or when
other hazards to navigation arise during the new bridge construction.
The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine
channel 16 (VHF-FM) 24 hours in advance to any period of enforcement or
as soon as practicable in response to an emergency. If the project is
completed prior to December 1, 2017, enforcement of the safety zone
will be suspended and notice given via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule
because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The late finalization of project details did not give the
Coast Guard enough time to publish an NPRM, take public comments, and
issue a final rule before the construction work is set to begin. It
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to delay
promulgating this rule as it is necessary to respond to the potential
safety hazards associated with the bridge replacement project beginning
on October 1, 2017.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. For reasons stated in
the preceding paragraph, delaying the implementation of this rule would
be impractical.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP
Sector Northern New England has determined that potential hazards
associated with the bridge replacement project starting on October 1,
2017 and continuing through December 1, 2017 will be a safety concern
for anyone within the work zone. This rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment within the safety zone
while the bridge replacement project is completed.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from October 1, 2017 through
December 1, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters from
surface to bottom of 50 yards to either side of the Weskeag Bridge. The
duration of the zone is intended to protect people, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable waters during the bridge
replacement project. When enforced, no vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative.
The Coast Guard will notify the public and local mariners of this
safety zone through appropriate means, which may include, but are not
limited to, publication in the Federal Register, the Local Notice to
Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine Channel 16 (VHF-
FM) in advance of any scheduled enforcement period. The regulatory text
we are enforcing appears at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive order 13771.
The Coast Guard has determined that this rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) The safety
zone only
[[Page 44076]]
impacts a small designated area of the Weskeag River, (2) the zone will
only be enforced when work equipment will be placed in the navigable
channel during removal and replacement of the bridge or if necessitated
by an emergency, (3) persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety
zone may do so with permission from the COTP Sector Northern New
England or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will notify the
public of the enforcement of this rule via appropriate means, such as
via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A., this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within
50 yards of the Weskeag Bridge during its removal and replacement. It
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A Record of Environmental
Consideration for Categorically Excluded Actions will be available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0791 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0791 Safety Zone--Route 73 Weskeag Bridge, Weskeag
River, South Thomaston, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone. All navigable
waters of the Weskeag River, ME within a 50-yard radius of the Route 73
Weskeag Bridge that spans the Weskeag River in South Thomaston, ME in
position 44[deg]03'06'' N, 069[deg]07'33'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule will be effective
on October 1, 2017, through December 1, 2017, but will only be enforced
during removal and replacement of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge or other
instances which may cause a hazard to navigation, when deemed necessary
by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Northern New England.
(c) Regulations. When this safety zone is enforced, the following
regulations, along with those contained in Sec. 165.23 apply:
(1) No person or vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of the Port
[[Page 44077]]
(COTP) or a COTP representative. However, any vessel that is granted
permission by the COTP or a COTP representative must proceed through
the area with caution and operate at a speed no faster than that speed
necessary to maintain a safe course, unless otherwise required by the
Navigation Rules.
(2) Any person or vessel permitted to enter the safety zone shall
comply with the directions and orders of the COTP or a COTP
representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by
siren, radio, flashing lights, or other means, the operator of a vessel
within the zone shall proceed as directed. Any person or vessel within
the safety zone shall exit the zone when directed by the COTP or a COTP
representative.
(3) To obtain permissions required by this regulation, individuals
may reach the COTP or a COTP representative via Channel 16 (VHF-FM) or
(207) 741-5465 (Sector Northern New England Command Center).
(d) Penalties. Those who violate this section are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
(e) Notification. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England will give
notice through the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners for the purpose of enforcement of temporary safety zone.
Sector Northern New England will also notify the public to the greatest
extent possible of any period in which the Coast Guard will suspend
enforcement of this safety zone.
(f) COTP representative. A COTP representative may be any Coast
Guard commissioned, or petty officer or any federal, state, or local
law enforcement officer who has been designated by the COTP to act on
the COTP's behalf. A COTP representative may be on a Coast Guard
vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel, a state or local law
enforcement vessel, or a location on shore.
Dated: September 15, 2017.
M.A. Baroody,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Northern New
England.
[FR Doc. 2017-20068 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P