Department of the Air Force; Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, 43794-43797 [2017-19799]
Download as PDF
43794
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 19, 2017 / Notices
Burden estimates for each reporting
institution type are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2—BURDEN ESTIMATES FOR THE 2017 GSS
Respondents
(number of
schools)
School type
Average
burden
(hours)
Total burden
(hours)
Master’s Only ...............................................................................................................................
Master’s/Doctorate: 15 or fewer units .........................................................................................
Master’s/Doctorate: More than 15 units ......................................................................................
FFRDCs .......................................................................................................................................
339
205
282
43
5.9
17.1
86.6
3.7
2,000
3,506
24,421
159
Estimated total ......................................................................................................................
869
........................
30,086
The number of units in the
subsequent survey cycle will include
the institutions in the previous year
plus an approximate 1 percent increase
in institutions. The FFRDC postdoc data
collection will take place in 2017 and
2019, and the estimated burden for
those years will increase by 159 hours
from 43 FFRDCs (based on 100 percent
response rate in 2015 with the average
burden of 3.7 hours per FFRDC) to a
total of 30,086 and 30,738 hours,
respectively (see Table 3). Estimates of
the 2018 GSS burden are 30,262 hours.
An additional 800 hours across three
years are requested to conduct
methodological testing.
TABLE 3—TOTAL BURDEN ESTIMATES FOR 2017–19 GSS
Survey cycle
Respondents
(number of
schools)
2017 GSS ................................................................................................................................................................
GSS Institutions ................................................................................................................................................
FFRDCs ............................................................................................................................................................
2018 GSS ................................................................................................................................................................
2019 GSS ................................................................................................................................................................
GSS Institutions ................................................................................................................................................
FFRDCs ............................................................................................................................................................
Future methodological testing (across all 3 years) .................................................................................................
869
826
43
836
888
845
43
........................
30,086
29,927
159
30,262
30,738
30,579
159
800
Total estimated burden .....................................................................................................................................
Estimated average annual burden ..........................................................................................................................
2,593
864
91,886
30,629
The total estimated respondent
burden of the GSS, including 800 hours
for the methodological studies, will be
91,886 hours over the 3-survey
clearance period.
Dated: September 14, 2017.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2017–19889 Filed 9–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. 030–28641; NRC–2017–0095]
Department of the Air Force; Robins
Air Force Base, Georgia
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering an
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Sep 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
amendment to Materials License 42–
23539–01AF, issued to the Department
of the Air Force (licensee), Docket No.
030–28641, to approve a
decommissioning plan (DP) for Building
181 at Robins Air Force Base (AFB),
Georgia. If the DP is approved by the
NRC, the licensee would be authorized
to remediate residual depleted uranium
(DU) from the building, prior to partial
demolition of the building. As part of its
review, the NRC conducted an
assessment of the environmental
impacts of the proposed
decommissioning action. The NRC
concluded that the proposed
decommissioning project will have
minimal impacts on the environment.
This Notice provides details of the
NRC’s environmental assessment. Based
in part on this assessment, the NRC
plans to approve the proposed DP by
amending the license.
Materials License 42–23539–
01AF, Docket No. 030–28641, will be
amended to approve the DP on or after
September 19, 2017.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
(hours)
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2017–0095 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0095. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 19, 2017 / Notices
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in this document. In
addition, for the convenience of the
reader, the ADAMS accession numbers
are provided in a table in the
‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section of
this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vivian Campbell, Region IV Office, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1600
E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, TX 76011;
telephone: 817–200–1455, email:
Vivian.Campbell@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an
amendment to Materials License 42–
23539–01AF, issued to Department of
the Air Force, approving the proposed
DP for remediation of Building 181 at
Robins AFB, Georgia (ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML17094A481 and
ML17167A420, respectively). If
approved by the NRC, the licensee
would be allowed to remediate residual
DU from inside and underneath the
building as necessary to meet the NRC’s
criteria for unrestricted use. Therefore,
as required by part 51 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the
NRC performed an environmental
assessment (EA) of the proposed
decommissioning activity. Based on the
results of the EA that follows, the NRC
has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
licensing action and is issuing a finding
of no significant impact (FONSI).
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The NRC’s proposed action is to
amend License 42–23539–01AF to
approve the proposed DP, as revised.
The licensee would then be authorized
to conduct decommissioning work as
specified in the NRC-approved DP.
Concurrently with the approval of the
proposed decommissioning work
instructions, the NRC plans to approve
the licensee’s proposed site-specific
radiological release criteria and final
status survey plan.
If approved, the licensee’s contractor
will remediate residual radioactive
contamination and lead-based paint
from the interior of the building using
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Sep 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
instructions provided in the DP. After
completion of decommissioning, the
contractor will conduct a final status
survey of the building surfaces in
accordance with the instructions
provided in the DP. The residual
radioactive and hazardous waste
material will be disposed at an
authorized disposal site based on
sample results of the removed material.
During building demolition, the
contractor will radiologically survey the
soil underneath portions of the building
to ensure that the soil is not
contaminated with radioactive material.
If contaminated, the soil will be
removed for disposal.
After completion of building
demolition, the contractor will conduct
a final status survey of the land
underneath the area where Cells 5 and
6 were previously located, to ensure that
the soil does not contain contamination
greater than the NRC-approved release
criteria. The NRC staff plans to conduct
routine inspections during
decommissioning and the final status
surveys. The NRC will also review and
approve the licensee’s final status
survey results after completion of the
decommissioning process. The NRC
may elect to conduct an independent
radiological confirmatory survey to
confirm the licensee’s final status
survey results.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to reduce the residual radioactivity
within Building 181 to levels that allow
the release of the property for
unrestricted use. If the licensee
conducts site remediation in accordance
with instructions provided in the DP,
the licensee will be in compliance with
the radiological criteria for license
termination as specified in regulation 10
CFR part 20, subpart E. Approval of the
DP would allow the NRC to fulfill its
responsibilities under the Atomic
Energy Act to ensure protection of
public health and safety and the
environment.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff considered the possible
environmental impacts of the proposed
action. The staff considered the impacts
on the following environmental
resources: (1) Land use; (2)
transportation; (3) geology and soils; (4)
water resources; (5) ecology; (6)
meteorology, climatology, and air
quality; (7) noise; (8) historical and
cultural resources; (9) visual/scenic
resources; (10) socioeconomic; (11)
public and occupational health; and (12)
waste management.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43795
Building 181 is located within the
boundary of Robins AFB. Other
structures and paved roads are located
around the property. An airfield and
tarmac are located nearby. The property
will remain under the control of the Air
Force during and after
decommissioning. Upon completion of
decommissioning and NRC approval of
the final status survey results, the
licensee is expected to release the land
and remainder of the building for
unrestricted use. The land use is not
expected to change significantly as a
result of this decommissioning project.
The transportation resource will be
impacted slightly during demolition of
the building. Additional vehicles will be
needed to demolish the building and to
remove the demolished debris. This
increase in transportation resources will
only exist as long as building
demolition is in progress. After
completion of demolition, the
transportation resource should return to
normal. A few additional trucks will be
needed for shipment of the
radiologically contaminated material to
a disposal site. The number of
additional trucks is expected to be
small, based on the low volume of
material required to be disposed.
The local geology and soils are not
expected to be impacted by building
demolition. The local soils were already
impacted by the construction of the
building and surrounding infrastructure.
Although unlikely, if the licensee
discovers contaminated soil underneath
the building, the soil with
contamination above the NRC-approved
cleanup criteria will have to be
excavated and packaged for shipment.
Clean backfill may be needed to fill any
soil removed during decommissioning.
The area of the demolition project is
small when compared to the overall size
of the military base.
The water resources are not expected
to be impacted by building demolition.
Based on the depth of the unsaturated
zone (25 feet/7.6 meter) and the
thickness of the floor (5–6 feet/1.5–1.8
meters), the licensee concluded that it
was unlikely that DU contamination
within Building 181 has migrated into
the groundwater. As noted in the DP,
the contractor will try to prevent
potentially contaminated water from
exiting the building. The contractor will
plug building drains during
decommissioning work. If the buildup
of water occurs in the building, the
contractor will install containments at
exit points, such as doorways, to
prevent releases of potentially
contaminated water from leaving the
building.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
43796
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 19, 2017 / Notices
The demolition of the building is not
expected to have an impact on local
ecology. No critical or endangered
species or habitats are expected to be
impacted, since the building is
surrounded by other buildings and
pavement.
The demolition of the building may
have short-term impacts on air quality.
These potential impacts include
possible release of airborne radioactive
particulates during decommissioning,
airborne dust during demolition, and
vehicle exhaust. To protect against
releases of potentially radioactive
airborne effluents, the licensee’s
contractor plans to collect outdoor air
samples during decommissioning work.
If the airborne particulate action level is
exceeded, the building doors will be
shut to minimize airborne effluents.
With regards to the potential for
airborne dust during building
demolition, the demolition contractor is
expected to take typical industrial
precautions to minimize airborne dust
including use of water suppression or
discontinuing work during windy
conditions. Finally, the work will result
in a short term increase of vehicle
exhaust during building demolition
work. The percent increase in vehicle
exhaust is expected to be small
compared to the relative size of the Air
Force base.
Noise will increase during building
demolition work. The increase in noise
is expected to be limited to daytime
hours and will last only for the duration
of the work.
No historical, cultural, visual, or
scenic resources are expected to be
impacted. Any cultural or historical
resource would have been impacted
during the construction of the building.
The demolition of the building is not
expected to impact any resources
beyond the area already impacted by
current development. The
decommissioning and demolition of the
building will not impact scenic or visual
resources. The building is not
considered historically significant,
otherwise, the Air Force would not be
demolishing it.
The decommissioning and demolition
of the building will not impact any
social groups, and the economic impacts
of the work activities are expected to be
minimal. The Air Force has not stated
what it plans to do with the area once
the building has been partially
demolished, but the land use will most
likely be similar to what is already in
place. The Air Force does not plan to
relinquish control of the area after
building demolition, and the footprint
of the building will continue to remain
within the boundary of Robins AFB.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Sep 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
The decommissioning contractor will
provide measures to control public and
occupational health during work. For
example, the decommissioning
contractor will monitoring workers for
exposure to airborne radioactivity. The
demolition contractor is expected to
implement typical industrial safety
controls such as issuance of safety
equipment to workers, control of work
area boundaries, and suppression of
dust. As part of its review, the NRC
considered the impacts of residual
radioactivity that may remain within
building rubble or subsurface soil. The
licensee proposed cleanup criteria that
is protective of human health and
safety. The licensee’s contractor is
expected to remove the residual
radioactive contamination to levels that
are at or below the cleanup criteria, an
action that is protective of public health
and safety. Details about the NRC’s
analysis of the cleanup criteria are
provided in a separate Safety Evaluation
Report (ADAMS Accession No.
ML17193A222).
Finally, the decommissioning
contractor established procedures for
disposal of waste material. The DP
indicates that the contractor plans to
sample the waste material, to identify
the levels of radiological and hazardous
materials present. As noted earlier, the
contractor will also remove lead-based
paint as part of the work project. The
concentrations of radioactive and
hazardous wastes in the material will
dictate how the material will be
packaged and transported, and the
concentrations will be used to identify
the disposal sites that can accept this
material for disposal. The demolition
contractor is expected to sample the
rubble to ensure that the material meets
the standards for the chosen waste
landfill. Liquid wastes are not expected
to be created.
In summary, the proposed
decommissioning and building
demolition are not expected to have
significant, long-term impacts on
environmental resources. Additional
details about the NRC’s environmental
review are provided in an expanded EA
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17207A232).
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). The no-action alternative
assumes that the status quo is
maintained. With respect to the
Building 181 project, the no-action
alternative means that the licensee
would not be allowed to conduct
decommissioning work, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contaminated building surfaces will
continue to remain onsite at Robins
AFB.
The no-action alternative is not
acceptable because it violates the NRC’s
Timeliness Rule regulations specified in
10 CFR 30.36. The Timeliness Rule
requires licensees to decommission
their facilities in a timely manner when
licensed activities have permanently
ceased. In addition, the radioactive
contamination at Building 181 currently
exceeds the radiological criteria for
license termination as specified in 10
CFR part 20, subpart E. Approval of the
no-action alternative will prevent the
licensee from conducting
decommissioning work as necessary to
release the site for unrestricted use
under Subpart E requirements.
Accordingly, the NRC staff eliminated
the no-action alternative from
consideration.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The NRC staff consulted with the
Georgia Department of Natural
Resources, Radioactive Materials
Program, regarding the EA of the
proposed action (ADAMS Accession No.
ML17193A244). The State’s comments
are discussed below.
The NRC staff determined that the
proposed action will not affect
endangered species or critical habitats,
because the project is located within an
area that was fully developed.
Therefore, no further consultations were
deemed necessary under Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act. Likewise,
the NRC staff determined that the
proposed action is not the type of
activity that has the potential to impact
historic properties, in part, because the
building has not been designated as a
historic property by the Air Force.
Therefore, no further consultation was
determined to be necessary under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
Discussion of Comments
By email dated August 14, 2017
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17227A184),
the State of Georgia suggested that once
demolition is complete and soil
contamination surveys are
accomplished, if these surveys reveal
any soil contamination, a groundwater
survey should be conducted. In the past,
the State has seen instances of
groundwater contamination, for
example, around a contaminated vault
that had to be remediated. While there
is no evidence of soil contamination
beneath Building 181, the State believes
that sampling of the groundwater is
prudent if the soil is contaminated. The
NRC staff informed the licensee of the
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
43797
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 19, 2017 / Notices
State’s comments, and the NRC plans to
review the results of the licensee’s soil
contamination survey.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff have concluded that
the proposed decommissioning project
at Robins AFB, Georgia, will have
minimal impacts on the environment.
The NRC staff considered the impacts
on land use, transportation, geology and
soils, water resources, ecology, air
quality, noise, historical and cultural
resources, visual and scenic resources,
socioeconomic resources, public and
occupational health, and waste
management. The staff also determined
that the affected environment and the
environmental impacts associated with
the decommissioning of Building 181
are bounded by the impacts evaluated
by NUREG–1496, Volume 1, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML042310492).
The staff finds that the proposed
decommissioning complies with 10 CFR
20.1402, which provides the
radiological criteria for unrestricted use.
Further, the licensee will perform the
remediation work under an NRC
license, using an NRC-approved
decommissioning plan, which will help
ensure that the licensee and its
contractor will establish and implement
programs to protect workers, the public,
and the environment. Further, the NRC
plans to conduct inspections during
work activities. Past NRC experiences
with decommissioning activities at
similar sites suggest that public and
worker exposures to radioactivity will
be far below the limits specified in 10
CFR part 20.
The NRC staff have prepared this EA
in support of the proposed action to
amend NRC Materials License 42–
23539–01AF to approve the licensee’s
proposed DP for Building 181 at Robins
AFB. On the basis of this EA, the NRC
has concluded that there are no
significant environmental impacts and
the license amendment does not warrant
the preparation of an environmental
impact statement. Accordingly, it has
been determined that a FONSI is
appropriate.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS
Accession No.
Document
U.S. Department of the Air Force, ‘‘Updated Decommissioning Plan dated February 2017 for Building 181 at Robins Air Force
Base, Georgia,’’ March 21, 2017.
U.S. Department of the Air Force, ‘‘Building 181 Robins Air Force Base Decommissioning Plan,’’ June 13, 2017 ......................
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ‘‘Robins AFB Consultation Letter with State of Georgia,’’ July 24, 2017 ..........................
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ‘‘Memo to File—Building 181 Robins AFB Georgia Environmental Assessment,’’ September 19, 2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ‘‘Memo to File—Building 181, Robins AFB Georgia Safety Evaluation Report,’’ September 19, 2017.
State of Georgia, ‘‘State of Georgia’s Review and Comments on Proposed EA and SER for Robins AFB, Georgia,’’ August
14, 2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG–1496, Volume 1, Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities, Main Report, July 31, 1997.
Dated at Arlington, Texas, this 31st day of
August 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark R. Shaffer,
Director, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety,
Region IV Office.
[FR Doc. 2017–19799 Filed 9–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2017–0107]
Information Collection: Fitness-forDuty Programs
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to the
Office of Management and Budget;
request for comment.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has recently
submitted a request for renewal of an
existing collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review. The information
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Sep 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
collection is entitled, ‘‘Fitness-for-Duty
Programs.’’
DATES: Submit comments by October 19,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments directly
to the OMB reviewer at: Aaron Szabo,
Desk Officer, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (3150–0146), NEOB–
10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503;
telephone: 202–395–3621, email: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cullison, NRC Clearance Officer,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–2084; email:
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2017–
0107 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ML17094A481
ML17167A420
ML17193A244
ML17207A232
ML17193A222
ML17227A184
ML042310492
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0107. A copy
of the collection of information and
related instructions may be obtained
without charge by accessing Docket ID
NRC–2017–0107 on this Web site.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
supporting statement and NRC Forms
890, 891, and 892 are available in
ADAMS under Accession Nos.
ML17236A379, ML17013A578,
ML17013A598, and ML17024A436,
respectively.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43794-43797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19799]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030-28641; NRC-2017-0095]
Department of the Air Force; Robins Air Force Base, Georgia
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an
amendment to Materials License 42-23539-01AF, issued to the Department
of the Air Force (licensee), Docket No. 030-28641, to approve a
decommissioning plan (DP) for Building 181 at Robins Air Force Base
(AFB), Georgia. If the DP is approved by the NRC, the licensee would be
authorized to remediate residual depleted uranium (DU) from the
building, prior to partial demolition of the building. As part of its
review, the NRC conducted an assessment of the environmental impacts of
the proposed decommissioning action. The NRC concluded that the
proposed decommissioning project will have minimal impacts on the
environment. This Notice provides details of the NRC's environmental
assessment. Based in part on this assessment, the NRC plans to approve
the proposed DP by amending the license.
DATES: Materials License 42-23539-01AF, Docket No. 030-28641, will be
amended to approve the DP on or after September 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0095 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0095. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public
[[Page 43795]]
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document. In addition, for the
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in
a table in the ``Availability of Documents'' section of this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vivian Campbell, Region IV Office,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, TX
76011; telephone: 817-200-1455, email: Vivian.Campbell@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Materials
License 42-23539-01AF, issued to Department of the Air Force, approving
the proposed DP for remediation of Building 181 at Robins AFB, Georgia
(ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17094A481 and ML17167A420, respectively). If
approved by the NRC, the licensee would be allowed to remediate
residual DU from inside and underneath the building as necessary to
meet the NRC's criteria for unrestricted use. Therefore, as required by
part 51 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the NRC
performed an environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed
decommissioning activity. Based on the results of the EA that follows,
the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement
for the licensing action and is issuing a finding of no significant
impact (FONSI).
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The NRC's proposed action is to amend License 42-23539-01AF to
approve the proposed DP, as revised. The licensee would then be
authorized to conduct decommissioning work as specified in the NRC-
approved DP. Concurrently with the approval of the proposed
decommissioning work instructions, the NRC plans to approve the
licensee's proposed site-specific radiological release criteria and
final status survey plan.
If approved, the licensee's contractor will remediate residual
radioactive contamination and lead-based paint from the interior of the
building using instructions provided in the DP. After completion of
decommissioning, the contractor will conduct a final status survey of
the building surfaces in accordance with the instructions provided in
the DP. The residual radioactive and hazardous waste material will be
disposed at an authorized disposal site based on sample results of the
removed material. During building demolition, the contractor will
radiologically survey the soil underneath portions of the building to
ensure that the soil is not contaminated with radioactive material. If
contaminated, the soil will be removed for disposal.
After completion of building demolition, the contractor will
conduct a final status survey of the land underneath the area where
Cells 5 and 6 were previously located, to ensure that the soil does not
contain contamination greater than the NRC-approved release criteria.
The NRC staff plans to conduct routine inspections during
decommissioning and the final status surveys. The NRC will also review
and approve the licensee's final status survey results after completion
of the decommissioning process. The NRC may elect to conduct an
independent radiological confirmatory survey to confirm the licensee's
final status survey results.
Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to reduce the residual
radioactivity within Building 181 to levels that allow the release of
the property for unrestricted use. If the licensee conducts site
remediation in accordance with instructions provided in the DP, the
licensee will be in compliance with the radiological criteria for
license termination as specified in regulation 10 CFR part 20, subpart
E. Approval of the DP would allow the NRC to fulfill its
responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act to ensure protection of
public health and safety and the environment.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC staff considered the possible environmental impacts of the
proposed action. The staff considered the impacts on the following
environmental resources: (1) Land use; (2) transportation; (3) geology
and soils; (4) water resources; (5) ecology; (6) meteorology,
climatology, and air quality; (7) noise; (8) historical and cultural
resources; (9) visual/scenic resources; (10) socioeconomic; (11) public
and occupational health; and (12) waste management.
Building 181 is located within the boundary of Robins AFB. Other
structures and paved roads are located around the property. An airfield
and tarmac are located nearby. The property will remain under the
control of the Air Force during and after decommissioning. Upon
completion of decommissioning and NRC approval of the final status
survey results, the licensee is expected to release the land and
remainder of the building for unrestricted use. The land use is not
expected to change significantly as a result of this decommissioning
project.
The transportation resource will be impacted slightly during
demolition of the building. Additional vehicles will be needed to
demolish the building and to remove the demolished debris. This
increase in transportation resources will only exist as long as
building demolition is in progress. After completion of demolition, the
transportation resource should return to normal. A few additional
trucks will be needed for shipment of the radiologically contaminated
material to a disposal site. The number of additional trucks is
expected to be small, based on the low volume of material required to
be disposed.
The local geology and soils are not expected to be impacted by
building demolition. The local soils were already impacted by the
construction of the building and surrounding infrastructure. Although
unlikely, if the licensee discovers contaminated soil underneath the
building, the soil with contamination above the NRC-approved cleanup
criteria will have to be excavated and packaged for shipment. Clean
backfill may be needed to fill any soil removed during decommissioning.
The area of the demolition project is small when compared to the
overall size of the military base.
The water resources are not expected to be impacted by building
demolition. Based on the depth of the unsaturated zone (25 feet/7.6
meter) and the thickness of the floor (5-6 feet/1.5-1.8 meters), the
licensee concluded that it was unlikely that DU contamination within
Building 181 has migrated into the groundwater. As noted in the DP, the
contractor will try to prevent potentially contaminated water from
exiting the building. The contractor will plug building drains during
decommissioning work. If the buildup of water occurs in the building,
the contractor will install containments at exit points, such as
doorways, to prevent releases of potentially contaminated water from
leaving the building.
[[Page 43796]]
The demolition of the building is not expected to have an impact on
local ecology. No critical or endangered species or habitats are
expected to be impacted, since the building is surrounded by other
buildings and pavement.
The demolition of the building may have short-term impacts on air
quality. These potential impacts include possible release of airborne
radioactive particulates during decommissioning, airborne dust during
demolition, and vehicle exhaust. To protect against releases of
potentially radioactive airborne effluents, the licensee's contractor
plans to collect outdoor air samples during decommissioning work. If
the airborne particulate action level is exceeded, the building doors
will be shut to minimize airborne effluents. With regards to the
potential for airborne dust during building demolition, the demolition
contractor is expected to take typical industrial precautions to
minimize airborne dust including use of water suppression or
discontinuing work during windy conditions. Finally, the work will
result in a short term increase of vehicle exhaust during building
demolition work. The percent increase in vehicle exhaust is expected to
be small compared to the relative size of the Air Force base.
Noise will increase during building demolition work. The increase
in noise is expected to be limited to daytime hours and will last only
for the duration of the work.
No historical, cultural, visual, or scenic resources are expected
to be impacted. Any cultural or historical resource would have been
impacted during the construction of the building. The demolition of the
building is not expected to impact any resources beyond the area
already impacted by current development. The decommissioning and
demolition of the building will not impact scenic or visual resources.
The building is not considered historically significant, otherwise, the
Air Force would not be demolishing it.
The decommissioning and demolition of the building will not impact
any social groups, and the economic impacts of the work activities are
expected to be minimal. The Air Force has not stated what it plans to
do with the area once the building has been partially demolished, but
the land use will most likely be similar to what is already in place.
The Air Force does not plan to relinquish control of the area after
building demolition, and the footprint of the building will continue to
remain within the boundary of Robins AFB.
The decommissioning contractor will provide measures to control
public and occupational health during work. For example, the
decommissioning contractor will monitoring workers for exposure to
airborne radioactivity. The demolition contractor is expected to
implement typical industrial safety controls such as issuance of safety
equipment to workers, control of work area boundaries, and suppression
of dust. As part of its review, the NRC considered the impacts of
residual radioactivity that may remain within building rubble or
subsurface soil. The licensee proposed cleanup criteria that is
protective of human health and safety. The licensee's contractor is
expected to remove the residual radioactive contamination to levels
that are at or below the cleanup criteria, an action that is protective
of public health and safety. Details about the NRC's analysis of the
cleanup criteria are provided in a separate Safety Evaluation Report
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17193A222).
Finally, the decommissioning contractor established procedures for
disposal of waste material. The DP indicates that the contractor plans
to sample the waste material, to identify the levels of radiological
and hazardous materials present. As noted earlier, the contractor will
also remove lead-based paint as part of the work project. The
concentrations of radioactive and hazardous wastes in the material will
dictate how the material will be packaged and transported, and the
concentrations will be used to identify the disposal sites that can
accept this material for disposal. The demolition contractor is
expected to sample the rubble to ensure that the material meets the
standards for the chosen waste landfill. Liquid wastes are not expected
to be created.
In summary, the proposed decommissioning and building demolition
are not expected to have significant, long-term impacts on
environmental resources. Additional details about the NRC's
environmental review are provided in an expanded EA (ADAMS Accession
No. ML17207A232).
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
The no-action alternative assumes that the status quo is maintained.
With respect to the Building 181 project, the no-action alternative
means that the licensee would not be allowed to conduct decommissioning
work, and the contaminated building surfaces will continue to remain
onsite at Robins AFB.
The no-action alternative is not acceptable because it violates the
NRC's Timeliness Rule regulations specified in 10 CFR 30.36. The
Timeliness Rule requires licensees to decommission their facilities in
a timely manner when licensed activities have permanently ceased. In
addition, the radioactive contamination at Building 181 currently
exceeds the radiological criteria for license termination as specified
in 10 CFR part 20, subpart E. Approval of the no-action alternative
will prevent the licensee from conducting decommissioning work as
necessary to release the site for unrestricted use under Subpart E
requirements. Accordingly, the NRC staff eliminated the no-action
alternative from consideration.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The NRC staff consulted with the Georgia Department of Natural
Resources, Radioactive Materials Program, regarding the EA of the
proposed action (ADAMS Accession No. ML17193A244). The State's comments
are discussed below.
The NRC staff determined that the proposed action will not affect
endangered species or critical habitats, because the project is located
within an area that was fully developed. Therefore, no further
consultations were deemed necessary under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act. Likewise, the NRC staff determined that the proposed
action is not the type of activity that has the potential to impact
historic properties, in part, because the building has not been
designated as a historic property by the Air Force. Therefore, no
further consultation was determined to be necessary under Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Discussion of Comments
By email dated August 14, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17227A184),
the State of Georgia suggested that once demolition is complete and
soil contamination surveys are accomplished, if these surveys reveal
any soil contamination, a groundwater survey should be conducted. In
the past, the State has seen instances of groundwater contamination,
for example, around a contaminated vault that had to be remediated.
While there is no evidence of soil contamination beneath Building 181,
the State believes that sampling of the groundwater is prudent if the
soil is contaminated. The NRC staff informed the licensee of the
[[Page 43797]]
State's comments, and the NRC plans to review the results of the
licensee's soil contamination survey.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff have concluded that the proposed decommissioning
project at Robins AFB, Georgia, will have minimal impacts on the
environment. The NRC staff considered the impacts on land use,
transportation, geology and soils, water resources, ecology, air
quality, noise, historical and cultural resources, visual and scenic
resources, socioeconomic resources, public and occupational health, and
waste management. The staff also determined that the affected
environment and the environmental impacts associated with the
decommissioning of Building 181 are bounded by the impacts evaluated by
NUREG-1496, Volume 1, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination
of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML042310492).
The staff finds that the proposed decommissioning complies with 10
CFR 20.1402, which provides the radiological criteria for unrestricted
use. Further, the licensee will perform the remediation work under an
NRC license, using an NRC-approved decommissioning plan, which will
help ensure that the licensee and its contractor will establish and
implement programs to protect workers, the public, and the environment.
Further, the NRC plans to conduct inspections during work activities.
Past NRC experiences with decommissioning activities at similar sites
suggest that public and worker exposures to radioactivity will be far
below the limits specified in 10 CFR part 20.
The NRC staff have prepared this EA in support of the proposed
action to amend NRC Materials License 42-23539-01AF to approve the
licensee's proposed DP for Building 181 at Robins AFB. On the basis of
this EA, the NRC has concluded that there are no significant
environmental impacts and the license amendment does not warrant the
preparation of an environmental impact statement. Accordingly, it has
been determined that a FONSI is appropriate.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS Accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Department of the Air Force, ``Updated ML17094A481
Decommissioning Plan dated February 2017 for
Building 181 at Robins Air Force Base,
Georgia,'' March 21, 2017.
U.S. Department of the Air Force, ``Building ML17167A420
181 Robins Air Force Base Decommissioning
Plan,'' June 13, 2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Robins ML17193A244
AFB Consultation Letter with State of
Georgia,'' July 24, 2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Memo to ML17207A232
File--Building 181 Robins AFB Georgia
Environmental Assessment,'' September 19,
2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Memo to ML17193A222
File--Building 181, Robins AFB Georgia
Safety Evaluation Report,'' September 19,
2017.
State of Georgia, ``State of Georgia's Review ML17227A184
and Comments on Proposed EA and SER for
Robins AFB, Georgia,'' August 14, 2017.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG- ML042310492
1496, Volume 1, Generic Environmental Impact
Statement in Support of Rulemaking on
Radiological Criteria for License
Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear
Facilities, Main Report, July 31, 1997.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated at Arlington, Texas, this 31st day of August 2017.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark R. Shaffer,
Director, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region IV Office.
[FR Doc. 2017-19799 Filed 9-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P