Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Increased Assessment Rate for Processed Pears, 43504-43506 [2017-19615]
Download as PDF
43504
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 179
Monday, September 18, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0045; SC17–927–1
PR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington; Increased Assessment
Rate for Processed Pears
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement a recommendation from the
Processed Pear Committee (Committee)
to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2017–2018 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to
$8.00 per ton of ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for
canning. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order and is
comprised of growers, handlers, and
processors of processed pears grown in
Oregon and Washington. Assessments
upon processed pear handlers are used
by the Committee to fund reasonable
and necessary expenses of the marketing
order. The fiscal period begins July 1
and ends June 30. The assessment rate
would remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended or
terminated.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
October 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
sradovich on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email:
Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part
927), regulating the handling of pears
grown in Oregon and Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563, and 13175.
This proposed rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action contained in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Additionally, because this proposed
rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not
trigger the requirements contained in
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled, ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled,
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the order now in
effect, Oregon and Washington pear
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate, as
proposed herein, would be applicable to
all assessable ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for
canning beginning July 1, 2017, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2017–2018 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to
$8.00 per ton for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
for canning handled under the order.
The assessment rate for ‘‘winter’’ and
‘‘other’’ pears for processing would
remain unchanged at zero.
The order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are growers,
handlers, and processors of Oregon and
Washington processed pears. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs,
and with the costs for goods and
services in their local area, and are thus
in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2012–2013 and subsequent
fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved,
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
sradovich on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 179 / Monday, September 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
the following three base rates of
assessment: (a) $7.00 per ton for any or
all varieties or subvarieties of pears for
canning classified as ‘‘summer/fall’’,
excluding pears for other methods of
processing; (b) $0.00 per ton for any or
all varieties or subvarieties of pears for
processing classified as ‘‘winter’’; and
(c) $0.00 per ton for any or all varieties
or subvarieties of pears for processing
classified as ‘‘other’’. The assessment on
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears applies only to
pears for canning and excludes pears for
other methods of processing defined in
§ 927.15, as pears for concentrate,
freezing, dehydrating, pressing, or in
any other way to convert pears into a
processed product. This rate continues
in effect from fiscal period to fiscal
period unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 31, 2017,
and unanimously recommended
expenditures of $800,150 for the 2017–
2018 fiscal period. In comparison, the
previous fiscal period’s budgeted
expenditures were $855,268. The
Committee also unanimously
recommended an assessment rate of
$8.00 per ton for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
for canning. The recommended
assessment rate of $8.00 is $1.00 higher
than the rate currently in effect.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2017–2018 fiscal period include
$605,606 for promotion and paid
advertising, $147,694 for research,
$25,000 for administration, and $21,850
for Committee expenses. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2016–2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for
promotion and paid advertising,
$127,288 for research, $25,000 for
administration, and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
Committee members estimate the
2017–2018 crop to be 100,000 tons,
which would be less than the 2016–
2017 production of 103,000 tons by
3,000 tons. Pear production tends to
fluctuate due to the effects of weather,
pollination, and tree health. Because of
the anticipated smaller crop, the
Committee recommended to both lower
budgeted expenses and increase the
assessment rate for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
in order to align assessment income
with expenses.
The Committee’s recommended
assessment rate was derived by dividing
the 2017–2018 anticipated expenses by
the expected shipments of ‘‘summer/
fall’’ pears for canning, while also taking
into account interest income and the
Committee’s monetary reserve.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
Shipments of ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for
canning for 2017–2018 are estimated at
100,000 tons, which should provide
$800,000 (100,000 tons × $8.00 per ton)
in assessment income. The projected
revenue from handler assessments,
together with funds from interest
income, would be adequate to cover the
2017–2018 budgeted expenses of
$800,150.
Section 927.42(a) of the order
authorizes the Committee to carry over
excess funds into subsequent fiscal
periods as a reserve, provided that funds
do not exceed approximately one year’s
operational expenses. The Committee
expects its monetary reserve, which was
estimated to be $544,990 at the end of
the 2016–2017 fiscal period, to remain
unchanged during the 2017–2018 fiscal
period. That amount would be within
the provisions of the order and would
provide the Committee with greater
ability to absorb fluctuations in
assessment income and expenses into
the future.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2017–2018 budget, and
those for subsequent fiscal periods,
would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43505
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,200
growers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and
approximately 50 processed pear
handlers subject to regulation under the
order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000, and small agricultural
service firms are defined as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,500,000.
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and
Nuts 2016 Summary issued in June 2017
by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, the total farm-gate value of
‘‘summer/fall’’ processed pears grown in
Oregon and Washington for 2016 was
$27,874,000. Based on the number of
‘‘summer/fall’’ processed pear growers
in the Oregon and Washington, the
average gross revenue for each grower
can be estimated at approximately
$23,228 ($27,874,000 divided by 1,200).
Furthermore, based on Committee
records, the Committee has estimated
that all of the Oregon-Washington pear
handlers currently ship less than
$7,500,000 worth of processed pears
each on an annual basis. From this
information, it is concluded that the
majority of growers and handlers of
Oregon and Washington processed pears
may be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate established for the
Committee, and collected from
handlers, for the 2017–2018 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to
$8.00 per ton for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
for canning. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2017–2018
expenditures of $800,150 and an
assessment rate of $8.00 per ton for
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning. The
proposed assessment rate of $8.00 is
$1.00 higher than the rate established
for the 2012–2013 fiscal period. Because
of the anticipated smaller crop, the
Committee recommended to both lower
budgeted expenses and increase the
assessment rate for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
in order to align assessment income
with expenses.
The 2017–2018 estimate of ‘‘summer/
fall’’ pears for canning is 100,000 tons.
At the proposed $8.00 per ton
assessment rate, the Committee
anticipates that assessment income of
approximately $800,000, along with
interest income, would be adequate to
cover budgeted expenses for the 2017–
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
sradovich on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
43506
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 179 / Monday, September 18, 2017 / Proposed Rules
2018 fiscal period of $800,150. With the
proposed assessment rate and budgeted
expense level, the Committee does not
anticipate utilizing any funds from the
monetary reserve. As such, reserve
funds are estimated to be $544,990 at
the end of the 2017–2018 fiscal period
on June 30, 2018. That reserve level is
within the maximum permitted by the
order of approximately one fiscal
period’s operational expenses
(§ 927.42(a)).
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2017–2018 fiscal period include
$605,606 for promotion and paid
advertising; $147,694 for research;
$25,000 for administration; and $21,850
for Committee expenses. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2016–2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for
promotion and paid advertising;
$127,288 for research; $25,000 for
administration; and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this action, including recommending
alternative expenditure levels and
assessment rates. Although lower
assessment rates were considered, none
were selected because they would not
have generated sufficient income to
administer the order. Similarly, the
Committee did not recommend lower
levels of budgeted expenditures than
proposed herein because it would have
reduced the effectiveness of the
program.
A review of historical data and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal period indicates
that the grower price for the 2017–2018
fiscal period could range between $325
and $346 per ton of ‘‘summer/fall’’
processed pears. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2017–2018 fiscal period, as a percentage
of total grower revenue could range
between 2.31 and 2.46 percent.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to growers. However,
these costs would be offset by the
benefits derived by the operation of the
order.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
processed pear industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May
31, 2017, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 (Generic
Fruit Crops). No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large processed pear handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is
deemed appropriate because handlers
are aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 927 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart A—[AMENDED]
2. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Order Regulating Handling’’ as subpart
A.
■
Subpart B—[Administrative
Provisions]
3. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ as subpart B
and revise the heading as shown above.
■ 4. Amend § 927.237 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 927.237
rate.
Processed pear assessment
On and after July 1, 2017, the
following base rates of assessment for
pears for processing are established for
the Processed Pear Committee:
(a) $8.00 per ton for any or all
varieties or subvarieties of pears for
canning classified as ‘‘summer/fall’’
excluding pears for other methods of
processing;
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–19615 Filed 9–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2017–0435; FRL–9967–51–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Arkansas;
Revisions to Minor New Source Review
Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve revisions to the
Arkansas State Implementation Plan
(SIP) minor New Source Review (NSR)
program submitted on July 26, 2010,
and March 24, 2017, including
supplemental information provided on
November 30, 2015, May 26, 2016, and
July 27, 2017. Specifically, we are
proposing to approve revisions that
revise the minor NSR permitting
thresholds and de minimis levels, as
well as, additional non-substantive
revisions. This proposed action is
consistent with the requirements of
section 110 of the CAA.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43504-43506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19615]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 179 / Monday, September 18, 2017 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 43504]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0045; SC17-927-1 PR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Increased Assessment Rate
for Processed Pears
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the
Processed Pear Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2017-2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00
to $8.00 per ton of ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The Committee
locally administers the marketing order and is comprised of growers,
handlers, and processors of processed pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. Assessments upon processed pear handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the marketing
order. The fiscal period begins July 1 and ends June 30. The assessment
rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended or
terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available
to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals
or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet
at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-
2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling of
pears grown in Oregon and Washington, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 13563, and 13175.
This proposed rule does not meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action contained in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled, ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled, `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under the order now in effect, Oregon and
Washington pear handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rate, as proposed herein, would be applicable to
all assessable ``summer/fall'' pears for canning beginning July 1,
2017, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate established
for the Committee for the 2017-2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$7.00 to $8.00 per ton for ``summer/fall'' pears for canning handled
under the order. The assessment rate for ``winter'' and ``other'' pears
for processing would remain unchanged at zero.
The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are growers, handlers, and processors of Oregon and
Washington processed pears. They are familiar with the Committee's
needs, and with the costs for goods and services in their local area,
and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a
public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity
to participate and provide input.
For the 2012-2013 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved,
[[Page 43505]]
the following three base rates of assessment: (a) $7.00 per ton for any
or all varieties or subvarieties of pears for canning classified as
``summer/fall'', excluding pears for other methods of processing; (b)
$0.00 per ton for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears for
processing classified as ``winter''; and (c) $0.00 per ton for any or
all varieties or subvarieties of pears for processing classified as
``other''. The assessment on ``summer/fall'' pears applies only to
pears for canning and excludes pears for other methods of processing
defined in Sec. 927.15, as pears for concentrate, freezing,
dehydrating, pressing, or in any other way to convert pears into a
processed product. This rate continues in effect from fiscal period to
fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 31, 2017, and unanimously recommended
expenditures of $800,150 for the 2017-2018 fiscal period. In
comparison, the previous fiscal period's budgeted expenditures were
$855,268. The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate
of $8.00 per ton for ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The recommended
assessment rate of $8.00 is $1.00 higher than the rate currently in
effect.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-
2018 fiscal period include $605,606 for promotion and paid advertising,
$147,694 for research, $25,000 for administration, and $21,850 for
Committee expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2016-2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for promotion and paid advertising,
$127,288 for research, $25,000 for administration, and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
Committee members estimate the 2017-2018 crop to be 100,000 tons,
which would be less than the 2016-2017 production of 103,000 tons by
3,000 tons. Pear production tends to fluctuate due to the effects of
weather, pollination, and tree health. Because of the anticipated
smaller crop, the Committee recommended to both lower budgeted expenses
and increase the assessment rate for ``summer/fall'' pears in order to
align assessment income with expenses.
The Committee's recommended assessment rate was derived by dividing
the 2017-2018 anticipated expenses by the expected shipments of
``summer/fall'' pears for canning, while also taking into account
interest income and the Committee's monetary reserve. Shipments of
``summer/fall'' pears for canning for 2017-2018 are estimated at
100,000 tons, which should provide $800,000 (100,000 tons x $8.00 per
ton) in assessment income. The projected revenue from handler
assessments, together with funds from interest income, would be
adequate to cover the 2017-2018 budgeted expenses of $800,150.
Section 927.42(a) of the order authorizes the Committee to carry
over excess funds into subsequent fiscal periods as a reserve, provided
that funds do not exceed approximately one year's operational expenses.
The Committee expects its monetary reserve, which was estimated to be
$544,990 at the end of the 2016-2017 fiscal period, to remain unchanged
during the 2017-2018 fiscal period. That amount would be within the
provisions of the order and would provide the Committee with greater
ability to absorb fluctuations in assessment income and expenses into
the future.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2017-2018 budget, and those
for subsequent fiscal periods, would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,200 growers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and approximately 50 processed pear handlers
subject to regulation under the order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $7,500,000.
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2016 Summary issued in
June 2017 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the total
farm-gate value of ``summer/fall'' processed pears grown in Oregon and
Washington for 2016 was $27,874,000. Based on the number of ``summer/
fall'' processed pear growers in the Oregon and Washington, the average
gross revenue for each grower can be estimated at approximately $23,228
($27,874,000 divided by 1,200). Furthermore, based on Committee
records, the Committee has estimated that all of the Oregon-Washington
pear handlers currently ship less than $7,500,000 worth of processed
pears each on an annual basis. From this information, it is concluded
that the majority of growers and handlers of Oregon and Washington
processed pears may be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate established
for the Committee, and collected from handlers, for the 2017-2018 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per ton for ``summer/
fall'' pears for canning. The Committee unanimously recommended 2017-
2018 expenditures of $800,150 and an assessment rate of $8.00 per ton
for ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The proposed assessment rate of
$8.00 is $1.00 higher than the rate established for the 2012-2013
fiscal period. Because of the anticipated smaller crop, the Committee
recommended to both lower budgeted expenses and increase the assessment
rate for ``summer/fall'' pears in order to align assessment income with
expenses.
The 2017-2018 estimate of ``summer/fall'' pears for canning is
100,000 tons. At the proposed $8.00 per ton assessment rate, the
Committee anticipates that assessment income of approximately $800,000,
along with interest income, would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses for the 2017-
[[Page 43506]]
2018 fiscal period of $800,150. With the proposed assessment rate and
budgeted expense level, the Committee does not anticipate utilizing any
funds from the monetary reserve. As such, reserve funds are estimated
to be $544,990 at the end of the 2017-2018 fiscal period on June 30,
2018. That reserve level is within the maximum permitted by the order
of approximately one fiscal period's operational expenses (Sec.
927.42(a)).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-
2018 fiscal period include $605,606 for promotion and paid advertising;
$147,694 for research; $25,000 for administration; and $21,850 for
Committee expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2016-2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for promotion and paid advertising;
$127,288 for research; $25,000 for administration; and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this action, including
recommending alternative expenditure levels and assessment rates.
Although lower assessment rates were considered, none were selected
because they would not have generated sufficient income to administer
the order. Similarly, the Committee did not recommend lower levels of
budgeted expenditures than proposed herein because it would have
reduced the effectiveness of the program.
A review of historical data and preliminary information pertaining
to the upcoming fiscal period indicates that the grower price for the
2017-2018 fiscal period could range between $325 and $346 per ton of
``summer/fall'' processed pears. Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2017-2018 fiscal period, as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 2.31 and 2.46 percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to growers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the processed pear industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 31,
2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189 (Generic
Fruit Crops). No changes in those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large processed pear
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate
because handlers are aware of this action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a public meeting.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Subpart A--[AMENDED]
0
2. Designate the subpart labeled ``Order Regulating Handling'' as
subpart A.
Subpart B--[Administrative Provisions]
0
3. Designate the subpart labeled ``Rules and Regulations'' as subpart B
and revise the heading as shown above.
0
4. Amend Sec. 927.237 by revising the introductory text and paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 927.237 Processed pear assessment rate.
On and after July 1, 2017, the following base rates of assessment
for pears for processing are established for the Processed Pear
Committee:
(a) $8.00 per ton for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
for canning classified as ``summer/fall'' excluding pears for other
methods of processing;
* * * * *
Dated: September 12, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-19615 Filed 9-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P