Rarity Pointe Commercial Recreation and Residential Development on Tellico Reservoir, Loudon and Monroe Counties, Tennessee, 43448-43449 [2017-19657]
Download as PDF
43448
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 178 / Friday, September 15, 2017 / Notices
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Rarity Pointe Commercial Recreation
and Residential Development on
Tellico Reservoir, Loudon and Monroe
Counties, Tennessee
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Amended Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) is amending its
September 10, 2003, Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Rarity Pointe Commercial
Recreation and Residential
Development on Tellico Reservoir,
Loudon and Monroe Counties,
Tennessee Final Environmental Impact
Statement (2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS). In
2012, WindRiver Management LLC
(WindRiver) purchased the Rarity
Pointe development and requested that
TVA consider modifications to the
original development plan. In July 2017,
TVA completed a supplemental
environmental assessment analyzing the
potential impacts of the proposed
modifications. This amended ROD
incorporates TVA’s decisions relating to
the modifications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Henry, NEPA Program and Valley
Projects, Tennessee Valley Authority,
400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902; Telephone: 865–632–
4045 or Email: abhenry@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is provided in accordance with
the Council on Environmental Quality’s
regulations and the TVA procedures for
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). On
September 10, 2003, TVA published in
the Federal Register (68 FR 53421) its
Record of Decision (ROD) for the Rarity
Pointe Commercial Recreation and
Residential Development on Tellico
Reservoir, Loudon and Monroe
Counties, Tennessee Final
Environmental Impact Statement. In the
ROD, TVA selected Alternative E of the
FEIS, approving construction of a
marina facility and par 3 golf course,
changes to land use allocations in the
Tellico Reservoir Land Management
Plan, and acceptance of a transfer of
properties for recreation and natural
resources conservation use.
In 2012, WindRiver Management LLC
(WindRiver) purchased the Rarity
Pointe development and requested
approval under Section 26a of the TVA
Act to install riprap shoreline
stabilization, two irrigation water
intakes, a stormwater outfall, and a park
in replacement of the previously
planned par 3 golf course. In July 2017,
TVA completed the Brightwater Park at
WindRiver Final Supplemental
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Sep 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
Environmental Assessment (Final SEA)
analyzing the potential impacts of the
proposed actions that modify the
original development plan. TVA now
amends the September 2003 ROD to
incorporate the revised proposal. By this
notice, TVA is providing notification of
its decision and agency reasoning.
To construct Brightwater Park and
install rip-rap stabilization at locations
around the WindRiver development,
TVA approval is needed within TVA’s
Section 26a jurisdiction. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) approval is
also needed under Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404
of the Clean Water Act for the proposed
stabilization and pier. Section 26a of the
TVA Act of 1933, as amended, requires
that TVA approval be obtained prior to
the construction, operation, or
maintenance of an obstruction affecting
navigation, flood control, or public
lands. Therefore, TVA’s action would be
to make a decision on the Section 26a
approval request for the proposed park,
shoreline stabilization, water intakes
and stormwater outfall. The USACE and
TVA have a Memorandum of
Understanding that designates TVA as
the Lead Federal Agency for conducting
environmental reviews under NEPA and
other applicable federal laws and
regulations for proposed work that may
occur on property which is under TVA
custody or control.
The Final SEA analyzes two
alternatives: Alternative A—the No
Action Alternative, and Alternative B—
Section 26a Permit Approval. Under
Alternative A, TVA would not issue
approval under Section 26a. The
applicant would not be permitted to
take any actions on TVA land below the
820 foot contour elevation except those
previously authorized by TVA under the
2003 ROD. Under Alternative B, TVA
would issue a Section 26a permit
approval to install riprap shoreline
stabilization, a park, two irrigation
water intakes, and a stormwater outfall.
The Final SEA identified Alternative
B—Section 26a Permit Approval as the
preferred alternative. Riprap
stabilization under Alternative B
includes approximately 6,360 linear feet
of rip-rap along steeper portions of the
shoreline of Tellico Reservoir which are
actively eroding resulting in
undermining of banks and loss of
riparian vegetation. The proposed
Brightwater Park includes a gravel and
asphalt parking area, two fire pits, a
retaining wall, an irrigation water intake
and pump installed under one canoe/
kayak floating dock (attached to a fixed
pier), lighting, electrical service, a
community garden, a shuffleboard
court, two pavilions, a fenced play area,
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a dog park, a picnic shelter, sidewalk
and walkways, picnic tables,
playground structures, and signage. The
majority of the park would be located on
TVA property below the 820 foot
contour elevation.
Environmental Consequences
In the Final SEA, TVA adopted the
analysis in the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS
and provided supplemental analysis of
the potential impacts of both Alternative
A and B on aesthetics, recreation,
floodplains, wetlands, aquatic ecology,
terrestrial ecology, water quality, noise,
and historic and archaeological
resources. The potential environmental
impacts of each alternative are
summarized for comparison in Section
2.2 of the Final SEA.
The proposed Alternative B would
have no additional impact on most
environmental resources evaluated in
the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS. There
would be no impacts to wetlands and
historic and archaeological resources
under Alternative B. Minor and
temporary impacts associated with
Alternative B were identified to aquatic
ecology, water quality, and noise
primarily in association with short-term
construction activities. These impacts
would be similar to the short-term
construction impacts for those same
resources in the 2003 Rarity Pointe
FEIS. Additionally, TVA has
determined that there would be new
minor impacts to aesthetics, floodplains,
and terrestrial ecology as a result of the
permanent changes resulting from
implementation of Alternative B beyond
those previously evaluated in the 2003
Rarity Pointe FEIS. Alternative B would
result in minor beneficial impacts to
recreation due to the increased
recreation opportunities in the area.
Environmentally Preferable Alternative
TVA has concluded that Alternative
A, the No Action Alternative, is the
environmentally preferred alternative,
as it would result in fewer
environmental impacts than Alternative
B. The No Action Alternative would
result in no additional or different
environmental impacts beyond those
previously evaluated in the 2003 Rarity
Pointe FEIS. These additional impacts
would be primarily associated with the
installation of the riprap stabilization.
Although Alternative B would have
slightly greater impacts than the No
Action Alternative, most of those
impacts would be minor. The
predominant adverse impact associated
with Alternative B would be a minor
change in the visual appearance of the
shoreline from various viewpoints
around the reservoir. This change would
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 178 / Friday, September 15, 2017 / Notices
be consistent, however, with the
shoreline appearance in other locations
and therefore would not be significant.
Alternative B would, however, provide
some environmental benefits. These
benefits include reducing shoreline
erosion at locations where the riprap
stabilization measures are placed and
completion of Brightwater Park
providing accessible public land and
recreation resources as was originally
intended with the 2003 decision.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Amended Decision
TVA has decided to amend the
September 2003 ROD to incorporate the
approval of Alternative B—Section 26a
Permit Approval. The rationale for
approving Alternative B is consistent
with the rationale provided in the
September 2003 ROD. The changes to
the original proposal described in
Alternative B achieves both WindRiver’s
objectives for development of the
residential and recreational community
and TVA’s overall goals for providing
recreational opportunities in the
Tennessee Valley. Environmental
impacts associated with Alternative B
would be minor and slightly greater
than impacts associated with
Alternative A.
Mitigation Measures
The September 2003 ROD lists
mitigation measures associated with the
2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS. These
mitigation measures remain in effect
across the development. TVA has
identified the following 2003 mitigation
measures to be specifically applicable to
the current proposed actions related to
the stabilization measures and
Brightwater Park:
• Fully shielded light fixtures or
those with internal low-glare optics (so
no light is emitted from the fixture at
angles above the horizon) will be used
in the development. This commitment
would also apply to the actions at
Brightwater Park.
• Any future facilities or equipment
subject to flood damage will be located
at or above elevation of 820 feet.
• Any future development proposed
within the limits of the 100-year
floodplain, elevation 816.7 feet MSL,
will be consistent with the requirements
of EO 11988.
• All future development will be
consistent with the requirements of
TVA’s Flood Control Storage Loss
Guideline.
• WindRiver will continue to mitigate
impacts to wetlands (W4 and W5) in the
vicinity of Brightwater Park by
implementing the wetland mitigation
plan in Appendix C of the 2003 Rarity
Pointe FEIS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Sep 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
TVA has identified the following new
mitigation measures associated with the
implementation of the Brightwater Park
SEA Alternative B—Section 26a Permit
Approval.
• No flood-damageable facilities or
equipment would be located within the
Brightwater Park grand lawn. The lawn
would be kept as a grassy area which
would not be expected to incur damage
during a flood.
• The switch on the irrigation pump
would be located at or above an
elevation of 820 feet.
• The minimum amount of rip-rap
would be used while still meeting
project objectives.
• The Brightwater Park sun shelter
will remain open to the elements and
may never be enclosed in the future.
Any flood-damageable equipment stored
in the sun shelter will be elevated to or
above elevation 820 feet.
• For purposes of shoreline bank
stabilization, all portions will be
constructed or placed, on average, no
more than two feet from the existing
shoreline at normal summer pool
elevation.
• For all electrical services permitted,
including the electrical plug, a
disconnect must be located at or above
elevation 818.1 that is accessible during
flooding.
• The floor elevation of the fixed
courtesy pier will be a minimum of 2.0
feet above the normal summer pool
elevation 813.0.
• The applicant should contact the
local government official(s) to ensure
that this facility complies with all
applicable local floodplain regulations.
• Any excess excavated material not
needed to grade Edgewater Road and the
parking lot will be disposed of and
contained on land lying and being above
the 816.7-foot contour. Every precaution
will be taken to prevent the reentry of
the spoil material into the reservoir.
• In the stabilization areas, the only
trees that would be removed are those
already undermined and actively falling
into the adjacent water. No trees greater
than 3 inches in diameter at breast
height would be removed.
• A vegetated buffer zone of at least
50 feet will be retained by TVA and
maintained along the shoreline from the
summer pool level in order to maintain
continuity on the site, and reduce
possible impacts to water quality and
wetlands.
• If the reservoir falls below the
elevation of the intake, the applicant
will be responsible for finding another
source of raw water.
• Cultural resource site 40LD29
would be avoided for all construction
activities. TVA would place a
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43449
commitment within the permit that
states that in the vicinity of cultural
resource site 40LD346, rip-rap would be
placed from the beach with no
equipment allowed on top of the site
and no bank shaping would be done. In
addition, TVA would require that an
archaeological monitor be present while
work is being conducted in that area.
David Bowling,
Vice President, Land and Resource
Management.
[FR Doc. 2017–19657 Filed 9–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2010–0073]
Portland & Western Railroad’s Request
for Positive Train Control Safety Plan
Approval and System Certification
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document notifies the
public that Portland & Western Railroad
(PNWR) submitted to FRA its Positive
Train Control Safety Plan (PTCSP)
(Version 1.5, dated July 21, 2017) for its
Westside Express Service and a copy of
that PTCSP is available for public
review and comment. PNWR asks FRA
to approve its PTCSP and issue a
Positive Train Control System
Certification for PNWR’s Enhanced
Automatic Train Control (E–ATC),
under the appropriate regulations.
DATES: FRA will consider comments
received by October 16, 2017, before
taking final action on the PTCSP. FRA
may consider comments received after
that date if practicable.
ADDRESSES: All communications
concerning this proceeding should
identify Docket Number FRA–2010–
0073 and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43448-43449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19657]
[[Page 43448]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Rarity Pointe Commercial Recreation and Residential Development
on Tellico Reservoir, Loudon and Monroe Counties, Tennessee
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Amended Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is amending its September
10, 2003, Record of Decision (ROD) for the Rarity Pointe Commercial
Recreation and Residential Development on Tellico Reservoir, Loudon and
Monroe Counties, Tennessee Final Environmental Impact Statement (2003
Rarity Pointe FEIS). In 2012, WindRiver Management LLC (WindRiver)
purchased the Rarity Pointe development and requested that TVA consider
modifications to the original development plan. In July 2017, TVA
completed a supplemental environmental assessment analyzing the
potential impacts of the proposed modifications. This amended ROD
incorporates TVA's decisions relating to the modifications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Henry, NEPA Program and Valley
Projects, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive,
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902; Telephone: 865-632-4045 or Email:
abhenry@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with
the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations and the TVA
procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). On September 10, 2003, TVA published in the Federal Register
(68 FR 53421) its Record of Decision (ROD) for the Rarity Pointe
Commercial Recreation and Residential Development on Tellico Reservoir,
Loudon and Monroe Counties, Tennessee Final Environmental Impact
Statement. In the ROD, TVA selected Alternative E of the FEIS,
approving construction of a marina facility and par 3 golf course,
changes to land use allocations in the Tellico Reservoir Land
Management Plan, and acceptance of a transfer of properties for
recreation and natural resources conservation use.
In 2012, WindRiver Management LLC (WindRiver) purchased the Rarity
Pointe development and requested approval under Section 26a of the TVA
Act to install riprap shoreline stabilization, two irrigation water
intakes, a stormwater outfall, and a park in replacement of the
previously planned par 3 golf course. In July 2017, TVA completed the
Brightwater Park at WindRiver Final Supplemental Environmental
Assessment (Final SEA) analyzing the potential impacts of the proposed
actions that modify the original development plan. TVA now amends the
September 2003 ROD to incorporate the revised proposal. By this notice,
TVA is providing notification of its decision and agency reasoning.
To construct Brightwater Park and install rip-rap stabilization at
locations around the WindRiver development, TVA approval is needed
within TVA's Section 26a jurisdiction. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) approval is also needed under Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the proposed
stabilization and pier. Section 26a of the TVA Act of 1933, as amended,
requires that TVA approval be obtained prior to the construction,
operation, or maintenance of an obstruction affecting navigation, flood
control, or public lands. Therefore, TVA's action would be to make a
decision on the Section 26a approval request for the proposed park,
shoreline stabilization, water intakes and stormwater outfall. The
USACE and TVA have a Memorandum of Understanding that designates TVA as
the Lead Federal Agency for conducting environmental reviews under NEPA
and other applicable federal laws and regulations for proposed work
that may occur on property which is under TVA custody or control.
The Final SEA analyzes two alternatives: Alternative A--the No
Action Alternative, and Alternative B--Section 26a Permit Approval.
Under Alternative A, TVA would not issue approval under Section 26a.
The applicant would not be permitted to take any actions on TVA land
below the 820 foot contour elevation except those previously authorized
by TVA under the 2003 ROD. Under Alternative B, TVA would issue a
Section 26a permit approval to install riprap shoreline stabilization,
a park, two irrigation water intakes, and a stormwater outfall.
The Final SEA identified Alternative B--Section 26a Permit Approval
as the preferred alternative. Riprap stabilization under Alternative B
includes approximately 6,360 linear feet of rip-rap along steeper
portions of the shoreline of Tellico Reservoir which are actively
eroding resulting in undermining of banks and loss of riparian
vegetation. The proposed Brightwater Park includes a gravel and asphalt
parking area, two fire pits, a retaining wall, an irrigation water
intake and pump installed under one canoe/kayak floating dock (attached
to a fixed pier), lighting, electrical service, a community garden, a
shuffleboard court, two pavilions, a fenced play area, a dog park, a
picnic shelter, sidewalk and walkways, picnic tables, playground
structures, and signage. The majority of the park would be located on
TVA property below the 820 foot contour elevation.
Environmental Consequences
In the Final SEA, TVA adopted the analysis in the 2003 Rarity
Pointe FEIS and provided supplemental analysis of the potential impacts
of both Alternative A and B on aesthetics, recreation, floodplains,
wetlands, aquatic ecology, terrestrial ecology, water quality, noise,
and historic and archaeological resources. The potential environmental
impacts of each alternative are summarized for comparison in Section
2.2 of the Final SEA.
The proposed Alternative B would have no additional impact on most
environmental resources evaluated in the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS. There
would be no impacts to wetlands and historic and archaeological
resources under Alternative B. Minor and temporary impacts associated
with Alternative B were identified to aquatic ecology, water quality,
and noise primarily in association with short-term construction
activities. These impacts would be similar to the short-term
construction impacts for those same resources in the 2003 Rarity Pointe
FEIS. Additionally, TVA has determined that there would be new minor
impacts to aesthetics, floodplains, and terrestrial ecology as a result
of the permanent changes resulting from implementation of Alternative B
beyond those previously evaluated in the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS.
Alternative B would result in minor beneficial impacts to recreation
due to the increased recreation opportunities in the area.
Environmentally Preferable Alternative
TVA has concluded that Alternative A, the No Action Alternative, is
the environmentally preferred alternative, as it would result in fewer
environmental impacts than Alternative B. The No Action Alternative
would result in no additional or different environmental impacts beyond
those previously evaluated in the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS. These
additional impacts would be primarily associated with the installation
of the riprap stabilization. Although Alternative B would have slightly
greater impacts than the No Action Alternative, most of those impacts
would be minor. The predominant adverse impact associated with
Alternative B would be a minor change in the visual appearance of the
shoreline from various viewpoints around the reservoir. This change
would
[[Page 43449]]
be consistent, however, with the shoreline appearance in other
locations and therefore would not be significant. Alternative B would,
however, provide some environmental benefits. These benefits include
reducing shoreline erosion at locations where the riprap stabilization
measures are placed and completion of Brightwater Park providing
accessible public land and recreation resources as was originally
intended with the 2003 decision.
Amended Decision
TVA has decided to amend the September 2003 ROD to incorporate the
approval of Alternative B--Section 26a Permit Approval. The rationale
for approving Alternative B is consistent with the rationale provided
in the September 2003 ROD. The changes to the original proposal
described in Alternative B achieves both WindRiver's objectives for
development of the residential and recreational community and TVA's
overall goals for providing recreational opportunities in the Tennessee
Valley. Environmental impacts associated with Alternative B would be
minor and slightly greater than impacts associated with Alternative A.
Mitigation Measures
The September 2003 ROD lists mitigation measures associated with
the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS. These mitigation measures remain in effect
across the development. TVA has identified the following 2003
mitigation measures to be specifically applicable to the current
proposed actions related to the stabilization measures and Brightwater
Park:
Fully shielded light fixtures or those with internal low-
glare optics (so no light is emitted from the fixture at angles above
the horizon) will be used in the development. This commitment would
also apply to the actions at Brightwater Park.
Any future facilities or equipment subject to flood damage
will be located at or above elevation of 820 feet.
Any future development proposed within the limits of the
100-year floodplain, elevation 816.7 feet MSL, will be consistent with
the requirements of EO 11988.
All future development will be consistent with the
requirements of TVA's Flood Control Storage Loss Guideline.
WindRiver will continue to mitigate impacts to wetlands
(W4 and W5) in the vicinity of Brightwater Park by implementing the
wetland mitigation plan in Appendix C of the 2003 Rarity Pointe FEIS.
TVA has identified the following new mitigation measures associated
with the implementation of the Brightwater Park SEA Alternative B--
Section 26a Permit Approval.
No flood-damageable facilities or equipment would be
located within the Brightwater Park grand lawn. The lawn would be kept
as a grassy area which would not be expected to incur damage during a
flood.
The switch on the irrigation pump would be located at or
above an elevation of 820 feet.
The minimum amount of rip-rap would be used while still
meeting project objectives.
The Brightwater Park sun shelter will remain open to the
elements and may never be enclosed in the future. Any flood-damageable
equipment stored in the sun shelter will be elevated to or above
elevation 820 feet.
For purposes of shoreline bank stabilization, all portions
will be constructed or placed, on average, no more than two feet from
the existing shoreline at normal summer pool elevation.
For all electrical services permitted, including the
electrical plug, a disconnect must be located at or above elevation
818.1 that is accessible during flooding.
The floor elevation of the fixed courtesy pier will be a
minimum of 2.0 feet above the normal summer pool elevation 813.0.
The applicant should contact the local government
official(s) to ensure that this facility complies with all applicable
local floodplain regulations.
Any excess excavated material not needed to grade
Edgewater Road and the parking lot will be disposed of and contained on
land lying and being above the 816.7-foot contour. Every precaution
will be taken to prevent the reentry of the spoil material into the
reservoir.
In the stabilization areas, the only trees that would be
removed are those already undermined and actively falling into the
adjacent water. No trees greater than 3 inches in diameter at breast
height would be removed.
A vegetated buffer zone of at least 50 feet will be
retained by TVA and maintained along the shoreline from the summer pool
level in order to maintain continuity on the site, and reduce possible
impacts to water quality and wetlands.
If the reservoir falls below the elevation of the intake,
the applicant will be responsible for finding another source of raw
water.
Cultural resource site 40LD29 would be avoided for all
construction activities. TVA would place a commitment within the permit
that states that in the vicinity of cultural resource site 40LD346,
rip-rap would be placed from the beach with no equipment allowed on top
of the site and no bank shaping would be done. In addition, TVA would
require that an archaeological monitor be present while work is being
conducted in that area.
David Bowling,
Vice President, Land and Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-19657 Filed 9-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-01-P