In the Matter of: Alexey Krutilin, a/k/a David Powell, 16 Melioratorov Street, Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region, Russia 357020; Order Denying Export Privileges, 43218-43219 [2017-19528]
Download as PDF
43218
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Karpenko by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Karpenko may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Karpenko and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until April 28, 2022.
Dated: September 8, 2017.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–19527 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: Alexey Krutilin, a/k/a
David Powell, 16 Melioratorov Street,
Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region,
Russia 357020; Order Denying Export
Privileges
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
On April 28, 2017, in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New
York, Alexey Krutilin a/k/a David
Powell (‘‘Krutilin’’) was convicted of
violating the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq. (2012)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Specifically,
Krutilin was convicted of violating
Section 206 of IEEPA, 50 U.S.C. 1705,
by willfully conspiring with others to
export from the United States to Russia
microelectronics items controlled
pursuant to the Export Administrations
Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘Regulations’’),1
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2017). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601–4623
(Supp. III 2015) (available at https://
uscode.house.gov)) (‘‘EAA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
and under the jurisdiction of the Bureau
of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S.
Department of Commerce (‘‘DOC’’),
without the required BIS/DOC license.
Krutilin was sentenced to time served
and an assessment of $100.00.
Section 766.25 of the Regulations
provides, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he
Director of the Office of Exporter
Services, in consultation with the
Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the EAA
[Export Administration Act], the EAR,
or any order, license, or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)); or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial
of export privileges under this provision
may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR
766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). In
addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that BIS’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any BIS
licenses previously issued pursuant to
the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’
or ‘‘the Act’’) or the Regulations in
which the person had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Krutilin’s
conviction for violating IEEPA, and has
provided notice and an opportunity for
Krutilin to make a written submission to
BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of
the Regulations. BIS has not received a
submission from Krutilin.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Krutilin’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of ten (10) years from the date of
Krutilin’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Krutilin had an interest at the
time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
April 28, 2027, Alexey Krutilin a/k/a
David Powell, with a last known
address of 16 Melioratorov Street,
Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region,
Russia 357020, and when acting for or
Notices, the most recent being that of August 15,
2017 (82 FR 39005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued
the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq. (2012)).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on his behalf, his successors, assigns,
employees, agents or representatives
(‘‘the Denied Person’’), may not, directly
or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, license exception, or export
control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or engaging
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or
from any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession or control of any item subject
to the Regulations that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby the Denied Person acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Krutilin by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Krutilin may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Krutilin and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until April 28, 2027.
Dated: September 8, 2017.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–19528 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
People’s Republic of China (PRC).1 The
period of review (POR) is December 1,
2014, through November 30, 2015. The
Department is issuing this notice to
correct an inadvertent error in the Final
Results. Specifically, the Department
granted a separate rate to Guandong
Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd. (Yihua
Timber); however, the Department
failed to take into account the
completion of a changed circumstances
review on the antidumping duty order
on multilayered wood flooring from the
PRC.2 In the CCR, the Department
determined that Yihua Lifestyle
Technology Co., Ltd. (Yihua Tech) is the
successor-in-interest to Yihua Timber.3
As such, effective March 22, 2017,
Yihua Tech is entitled to Yihua
Timber’s antidumping cash deposit rate
with respect to entries of subject
merchandise. The Department intends
to send updated cash deposit
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
This correction to the final results of
this administrative review is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(h) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
Dated: September 7, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–19529 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–970]
43219
steel nails (nails) from the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) are being sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV). The period of review (POR) is
May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016.
DATES: Effective September 14, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Pulongbarit or Annathea Cook,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4031 or
(202) 482–0250, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 31, 2017, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
the Preliminary Results of this
antidumping duty administrative review
of the antidumping order on nails from
the UAE.1 We invited parties to submit
comments on the Preliminary Results,
but we received no comments. The
Department conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain steel nails. The product is
currently classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, and
7317.00.75. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the order
remains dispositive.2
International Trade Administration
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Correction
to the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective September 14, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3147.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 5,
2017, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the final results
of the 2014–2015 administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
multilayered wood flooring from the
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Analysis of Comments Received
[A–520–804]
As noted above, we have received no
comments regarding the Preliminary
Results.
Certain Steel Nails From the United
Arab Emirates: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(Department) determines that certain
SUMMARY:
1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
Determination of No Shipments, and Final Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR 25766 (June 5, 2017)
(Final Results).
2 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Reviews, 82 FR 14691
(March 22, 2017) (CCR).
3 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we received no shipment claims from
two companies subject to this
administrative review: Oman Fasteners
LLC (Oman Fasteners) and Overseas
International Steel Industry LLC (OISI).
In the Preliminary Results, we
preliminarily determined that these
companies had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.3 We
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab
Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 24941
(May 31, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum) (Preliminary Results).
2 For a complete description of the scope of this
review, see Preliminary Results.
3 See Preliminary Results at 82 FR 24942.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43218-43219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: Alexey Krutilin, a/k/a David Powell, 16
Melioratorov Street, Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region, Russia
357020; Order Denying Export Privileges
On April 28, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of New York, Alexey Krutilin a/k/a David Powell (``Krutilin'')
was convicted of violating the International Emergency Economic Powers
Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2012)) (``IEEPA''). Specifically,
Krutilin was convicted of violating Section 206 of IEEPA, 50 U.S.C.
1705, by willfully conspiring with others to export from the United
States to Russia microelectronics items controlled pursuant to the
Export Administrations Regulations (``EAR'' or ``Regulations''),\1\ and
under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Industry and Security
(``BIS''), U.S. Department of Commerce (``DOC''), without the required
BIS/DOC license. Krutilin was sentenced to time served and an
assessment of $100.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2017). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601-
4623 (Supp. III 2015) (available at https://uscode.house.gov))
(``EAA'' or ``the Act''). Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in
lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17,
2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by
successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of
August 15, 2017 (82 FR 39005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued the
Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2012)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 766.25 of the Regulations provides, in pertinent part, that
``[t]he Director of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation
with the Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the
export privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation
of the EAA [Export Administration Act], the EAR, or any order, license,
or authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)); or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
4610(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that
BIS's Office of Exporter Services may revoke any BIS licenses
previously issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (``EAA'' or
``the Act'') or the Regulations in which the person had an interest at
the time of his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Krutilin's conviction for violating
IEEPA, and has provided notice and an opportunity for Krutilin to make
a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. BIS has not received a submission from Krutilin.
Based upon my review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I
have decided to deny Krutilin's export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of ten (10) years from the date of Krutilin's conviction.
I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act
or Regulations in which Krutilin had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until April 28, 2027, Alexey
Krutilin a/k/a David Powell, with a last known address of 16
Melioratorov Street, Ivanovskoe Village, Stavropol Region, Russia
357020, and when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns,
employees, agents or representatives (``the Denied Person''), may not,
directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction
involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the Regulations, including, but
not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license
exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any
other activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or from any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been
[[Page 43219]]
or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this
paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Krutilin by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Krutilin
may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce
for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from
the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to Krutilin and
shall be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect until April 28, 2027.
Dated: September 8, 2017.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017-19528 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P