Bureau of Indian Education Standards, Assessments, and Accountability System Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Establishment; Nominations, 43199-43202 [2017-19111]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Defining the high-mount combination
as an automobile transporter would
trigger the use of the same length
allowances that currently apply to a
traditional automobile transporter. In
doing so, Federal laws would govern the
operation of this vehicle on certain
roadways, and no State would be able
to impose an overall length limitation of
less than 65 feet or a front overhang
limitation of less than 3 feet or a rear
overhang limitation of less than 4 feet
for this vehicle combination.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Purpose of the Request
The FHWA is requesting comments
from affected stakeholders and the
public regarding interpreting the
statutory and regulatory language to
include a high-mount, truck-tractorsemitrailer combination as an
automobile transporter and treating the
combination as specialized equipment.
Comments are requested on the
following questions related to defining a
high-mount, truck-tractor-semitrailer
combination as an automobile
transporter:
• How will the inclusion of a highmount, truck-tractor-semitrailer
combination in the definition of
automobile transporter impact the flow
of Interstate commerce?
• Are there safety issues with a highmount, truck-tractor-semitrailer
combination as an automobile
transporter as it relates to the operation
of this vehicle configuration on the
National Network?
• What are implementation
implications (e.g. roadside enforcement
and changes to State laws) if Federal
versus State laws would govern the
operation of this vehicle configuration
on the National Network?
• What State laws are currently in
place regarding a highmount, trucktractor-semitrailer combination? Please
provide legal citations, if applicable.
• Are there States that allow the highmount, truck-tractor-semitrailer
combination to operate under the same
length provisions as a traditional
automobile transporter?
• Is there any other information
relating to safety, vehicle productivity,
or infrastructure preservation relevant to
these questions?
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31111 and Section
411 of the Surface Transportation Assistance
Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97–424)
Issued on: September 7, 2017.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Acting Administrator .
[FR Doc. 2017–19516 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 30
[178A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Bureau of Indian Education Standards,
Assessments, and Accountability
System Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee Establishment;
Nominations
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Request for nominations and
notice of intent to establish committee.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Interior is announcing its intent to
establish the Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE) Standards,
Assessments, and Accountability
System Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee (Committee) to advise the
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary)
through the BIE on a proposed rule to
revise the Adequate Yearly Progress
regulation and invite Tribes whose
students attend BIE-funded schools
operated by either the BIE or by the
Tribe through a contract or grant who
would be affected by the final rule to
nominate a representative for
membership on the Committee. The BIE
also invites nominations for Committee
members who will adequately represent
the interests that are likely to be
significantly affected by the proposed
rule such as: Students enrolled, or
parents of students enrolled at the 174
BIE-funded schools, school teachers and
administrators, Tribes, and Indian
communities served by these schools.
The BIE also solicits comments on the
proposal to establish the Committee.
DATES: Comments regarding the intent
to establish this Committee and
nominations for Committee members
must be submitted no later than October
16, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Ms. Juanita Mendoza, Bureau of Indian
Education, by any of the following
methods:
• (Preferred method) Email to:
BIEcomments@bia.gov;
• Mail, hand-carry or use an
overnight courier service to Ms. Juanita
Mendoza, Bureau of Indian Education,
1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 4657,
Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Juanita Mendoza, Bureau of Indian
Education; telephone: (202) 208–3559.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43199
I. Background
In 2005, BIA promulgated regulations
at 25 CFR part 30 that require BIE to use
the accountability system of the State in
which a BIE-funded school is located.
There are BIE-funded schools in 23
different States; and each State has its
own accountability system. As a result,
each State system produced student
achievement data that cannot be directly
compared with data from other States.
This created problems for the BIE in
identifying under-performing schools
and in directing resources effectively.
On November 9, 2015, BIE published
a notice of intent requesting
nominations for a negotiated rulemaking
committee to recommend revisions to
the existing regulations for BIE’s
accountability system (80 FR 69161). In
that notice of intent, the BIE solicited
nominations from Tribes whose
students attend BIE-funded schools
operated either by the BIE or by the
Tribe through a contract or grant, to
nominate Tribal representatives to serve
on the Committee and Tribal alternates
to serve when the representative is
unavailable.
The Every Student Succeeds Act
(ESSA), Pub. L. 114–95, then became
law, requiring an update to the subject,
scope, and issues that the Committee
would address. On April 14, 2016 (81
FR 22039), BIE announced its intent to
expand the scope of the Committee and
reopened the comment and nomination
period, requesting comments and
nominations by May 31, 2016. The
request for nominations was extended
on August 17, 2016 (81 FR 54768). On
January 18, 2017 a notice of proposed
membership, request for nomination
and a request for comments was
published (82 FR 5473).
Taking into consideration the
interests of the new Administration in
participating in this process, the
Department has decided that a new
negotiated rulemaking process, as
required by the ESEA, should begin.
Under ESEA Section 8204(c)(2), as
amended, Tribes have the authority to
waive, in part or in whole, the
definitions of standards, assessments,
and accountability system established
by the Secretary in accordance with this
rulemaking. The BIE encourages Tribal
self-determination in Native education;
and where a Tribal governing body or
school board determines it to be
appropriate, encourages the
development of alternative standards,
assessments, or accountability systems.
The Committee would be charged,
consistent with ESEA Section 8204,
with developing proposed regulations
for implementation of the Secretary’s
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
43200
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
responsibility to define standards,
assessments, and an accountability
system. These definitions will be
implemented in the 2018–2019 school
year. The final regulations will describe
how to execute the Secretary’s
responsibility to define the standards,
assessments, and an accountability
system consistent with ESEA Section
1111, for schools funded by the BIE on
a national, regional, or Tribal basis, as
appropriate, taking into account the
unique circumstances and needs of such
schools and the students served by such
schools. Additionally, the Committee
will be asked to provide
recommendations that encourage the
exercise of the authority of Tribes to
adopt their own standards, assessments,
and an accountability system and also to
provide recommendations on how BIE
could best provide technical assistance
under ESEA Section 8204(c)(3).
II. Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
The ESSA reauthorizes and amends
the ESEA. ESSA Section 8007 amends
ESEA Section 8204, and directs the
Secretary of the Interior, in consultation
with the Secretary of Education, if so
requested, to use a negotiated
rulemaking process to develop
regulations for implementation of the
Secretary of the Interior’s obligation to
define the standards, assessments, and
an accountability system that will be
utilized at BIE-funded schools. The
regulations, along with any necessary
revisions to part 30 generally, will
replace the existing 25 CFR part 30 and
will define the standards, assessments,
and an accountability system consistent
with ESEA, for BIE-funded schools on a
national, regional, or Tribal basis. The
regulations will be developed in a
manner that considers the unique
circumstances and needs of such
schools and the students served by such
schools. These definitions will be
implemented in the 2018–2019 school
year.
ESEA Section 8204 also provides that
if a Tribal governing body or school
board of a BIE-funded school
determines the requirements established
by the Secretary of the Interior are
inappropriate, they may waive, in part
or in whole, such requirements. Where
such requirements are waived, the
Tribal governing body or school board
shall, within 60 days, submit to the
Secretary of the Interior a proposal for
alternative standards, assessments, and
an accountability system, if applicable,
consistent with ESEA Section 1111. The
proposal must take into account the
unique circumstances and needs of the
school or schools and the students
served. The proposal will be approved
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
by the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Education, unless the
Secretary of Education determines that
the standards, assessments, and
accountability system do not meet the
requirements of ESEA Section 1111.
Additionally, a Tribal governing body or
school board of a BIE-funded school
seeking a waiver may request, and the
Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Education will provide,
technical assistance.
III. Statutory Authority
This document is published in
accordance with the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C.
561 et seq.); the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C.
Appendix 2); and the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965
(ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.)
IV. The Committee and Its Process
In negotiated rulemaking,
recommended provisions of a proposed
rule are developed by a committee
composed of at least one representative
of the Federal Government and
representatives of the interests that will
be significantly affected by the rule.
Decisions are made by consensus,
which means unanimous concurrence
among the interests represented on the
Committee, unless the Committee agrees
to define ‘‘consensus’’ to mean a general
but not unanimous concurrence, or
agrees upon another specified
definition. 5 U.S.C. 562(2)(A) and (B).
As part of the negotiated rulemaking
process, the BIE has identified interests
potentially affected by the rulemaking
under consideration, including students
enrolled at 174 BIE-funded schools,
parents of such students, school
administrators, Tribes, and the Indian
communities served by these schools.
By this notice of intent, the BIE is
soliciting: (1) Comments on its proposal
to form a negotiated rulemaking
committee; and (2) nominations for
Committee members who will
adequately represent the interests that
are likely to be significantly affected by
the proposed rule.
Following the receipt of nominations
and comments, BIE will publish a
second notice in the Federal Register
with a list of persons to represent the
interests that are likely to be
significantly affected by the rule and the
person or persons proposed to represent
the BIE. Persons who will be
significantly affected by the proposed
rule and who believe that their interests
will not be adequately represented by
any person specified in that second
Federal Register notice will be given an
opportunity to apply or nominate
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
another person for membership on the
Committee to represent such interests
with respect to the proposed rule.
Following the second Federal
Register notice and responses to it, BIE
expects to establish the Committee.
After the Committee reaches consensus
on the recommended provisions of the
proposed rule, as discussed in more
detail below, the BIE will publish a
proposed rule in the Federal Register.
Under 5 U.S.C. 563, the head of the
agency is required to determine that the
use of the negotiated rulemaking
procedure is in the public interest.
In making such a determination, the
agency head must consider certain
factors. Taking these factors into
account, the Secretary, through the
authority delegated to the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has
determined that a negotiated rulemaking
is in the public interest because:
1. A rule is needed. The ESEA directs
the Secretary to conduct a negotiated
rulemaking pursuant to the NRA.
2. A limited number of identifiable
interests will be significantly affected by
the rule. The 174 BIE-funded schools,
students enrolled at these schools,
school teachers and administrators,
Tribes, and Indian communities served
by these schools will be significantly
affected by this review and the
recommendations made by this
Committee.
3. There is a reasonable likelihood
that the Committee can be convened
with a balanced representation of
persons who can adequately represent
the interests discussed in item 2, above,
and who are willing to negotiate in good
faith to attempt to reach a consensus on
provisions of a proposed rule.
4. There is a reasonable likelihood
that the Committee will reach consensus
on a proposed rule within a fixed period
of time.
5. The use of negotiated rulemaking
will not delay the development of a
proposed rule because time limits will
be placed on the negotiation. We
anticipate that these negotiations will
expedite a proposed rule and ultimately
the acceptance of a final rule.
6. The BIE is making a commitment
to ensure that the Committee has
sufficient resources to complete its work
in a timely fashion.
7. The BIE, to the maximum extent
possible and consistent with the legal
obligations of the Agency, will use the
consensus report of the Committee as
the basis for a proposed rule for public
notice and comment.
V. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with FACA and NRA,
the BIE will use the following
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
procedures and guidelines for this
negotiated rulemaking. The BIE may
modify them in response to comments
received on this notice of intent or
during the negotiation process.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Committee Formation
The Committee will be formed and
operated in full compliance with the
requirements of FACA and NRA, and
specifically under the guidelines of its
charter.
B. Membership Responsibility
The Committee is expected to meet
approximately 3–5 times and will last
2–3 days each. The initial meeting will
be in person; some later meetings may
be held by teleconference and/or web
conference. The Committee’s work is
expected to occur over the course of 6–
12 months. However, the Committee
may continue its work for up to two
years.
Because of the scope and complexity
of the tasks at hand, Committee
members must be able to invest
considerable time and effort in the
negotiated rulemaking process.
Committee members must be able to
attend all Committee meetings, work on
Committee work groups, consult with
their constituencies between Committee
meetings, and negotiate in good faith
toward a consensus on issues before the
Committee. Because of the complexity
of the issues under consideration, as
well as the need for continuity, the
Secretary reserves the right to replace
any member who is unable to
participate in the Committee’s meetings.
Responsibility for expenses under 5
U.S.C. 568(c) is as follows:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking
committee shall be responsible for their
own expenses of participation in such
committee, except that an Agency may,
in accordance with Section 7(d) of the
FACA, pay for a member’s reasonable
travel and per diem expenses, expenses
to obtain technical assistance, and a
reasonable rate of compensation, if—
1. Such member certifies a lack of
adequate financial resources to
participate in the Committee; and
2. The agency determines that such
member’s participation in the
Committee is necessary to assure an
adequate representation of the member’s
interest.
The BIE commits to pay the
reasonable travel and per diem expenses
of Committee members, if appropriate,
under the NRA and Federal travel
regulations.
C. Composition of Committee
The Secretary is seeking nominations
for representatives to serve on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Committee who can represent the
interests of students enrolled at the 174
BIE-funded schools, parents of such
students, school administrators, Tribes,
and the Indian communities served by
these schools, and who have a
demonstrated ability to communicate
well with groups about the interests
they will represent. The Committee
membership will consist of
approximately 15, but not more than 25
members in accordance with the NRA.
Non-Federal Committee membership
must:
• Include only representatives of the
interests described above;
• Comply with the FACA.
41 CFR 102–3.30 requires the
membership of a FACA committee to be
fairly balanced in its member in terms
of the points of view represented and
the functions to be performed. In
making membership decisions, the
Secretary shall consider whether the
interest represented by a nominee will
be affected significantly by the final
products of the Committee, which may
include report(s) and/or proposed
regulations; whether that interest is
already adequately represented by
nominees; and whether the potential
addition would adequately represent
that interest.
Federally registered lobbyists are
ineligible to serve on all FACA and nonFACA boards, committees, or councils
in an individual capacity. The term
‘‘individual capacity’’ refers to
individuals who are appointed to
exercise their own individual best
judgment on behalf of the government,
such as when they are designated
Special Government Employees, rather
than being appointed to represent a
particular interest.
D. Administrative and Technical
Support
The BIE will provide sufficient
administrative and technical resources
for the Committee to complete its work
in a timely fashion. The BIE, with the
help of the facilitator, will prepare and
provide a final report of any issues on
which the Committee reaches
consensus.
E. Training and Organization
At the first meeting of the Committee,
a neutral facilitator will provide training
on negotiated rulemaking, interest-based
negotiations, and consensus-building. In
addition, at the first meeting, Committee
members will make organizational
decisions concerning protocols,
scheduling, and facilitation of the
Committee.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43201
F. Interests Identified
Under Section 562 of the NRA,
‘‘interest’’ means, with respect to an
issue or matter, multiple parties which
have a similar point of view or which
are likely to be affected in a similar
manner.’ The BIE has identified the
interests to be significantly affected by
this new rule to include students
enrolled at 174 BIE-funded schools,
parents of such students, school
administrators, Tribes, and the Indian
communities served by these schools.
The BIE is accepting comments
identifying other interests that may be
significantly affected by the final
products of the Committee, which may
include report(s) and/or proposed
regulations, until the date listed in the
DATES section of this notice of intent.
VI. Nominations
The BIE solicits nominations from
representatives of the interests
identified above and an alternate to
serve when the representative is
unavailable.
Each nomination is expected to
include a nomination for a primary
representative and an alternate who can
fulfill the obligations of membership
should the primary representative be
unable to attend. The Committee
membership should reflect a diversity of
interests, and nominees should only be
of representatives and alternates who
will:
• Have knowledge of school
standards, assessments and
accountability systems;
• Have relevant experience as past or
present superintendents, principals,
teachers, or school board members;
• Be able to coordinate, to the extent
possible, with other interests who may
not be represented on the Committee;
• Be able to represent one or more of
the specified interests with the authority
to embody the views of that interest,
communicate with interested
constituents, and have a clear means to
reach agreement on behalf of the
interest(s);
• Be able to negotiate effectively on
behalf of the interest(s) represented;
• Be able to commit the time and
effort required to attend and prepare for
meetings; and
• Be able to collaborate among
diverse parties in a consensus-seeking
process.
The BIE will consider nominations for
representatives only if they are
nominated through the process
identified in this Notice of Intent. The
BIE will not consider any nominations
that we receive in any other manner. If
you submitted a nomination in response
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
43202
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
to previous notices (80 FR 69161; 81 FR
22039; 81 FR 54768; 82 FR 5473) you
must submit a new nomination package.
Previous applications will not be
considered. The BIE will not consider
nominations for Federal representatives.
Only the Secretary may nominate
Federal employees to the Committee.
Nominations must include the
following information about each
nominee:
(1) A current letter from the entity
representing one of the interest(s)
identified supporting the nomination of
the individual to serve as a
representative for the Committee;
(2) A resume reflecting the nominee’s
qualifications and experience in Indian
education; resume to include the
nominee’s name, Tribal affiliation (if
applicable), job title, major job duties,
employer, business address, business
telephone and fax numbers (and
business email address, if applicable);
(3) The interest(s) to be represented by
the nominee (see section V, part F) and
whether the nominee will represent
other interest(s) related to this
rulemaking; and
(4) A brief description of how the
nominee will represent the views of the
identified interest(s), communicate with
constituents, and have a clear means to
reach agreement on behalf of the
interest(s) they are representing.
(5) A statement on whether the
nominee is only representing one
interest or whether the expectation is
that the nominee represents a specific
group of interests.
To be considered, nominations must
be received by the close of business on
the date listed in the DATES section, at
the location indicated in the ADDRESSES
section.
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VII. Certification
For the above reasons, I hereby certify
that the Bureau of Indian Education
Standards, Assessments, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Sep 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
Accountability System Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee is in the public
interest.
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6301; 5 U.S.C. 561; 5
U.S.C. Appendix 2.
Dated: September 1, 2017.
Michael S. Black,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–19111 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0130; FRL–9967–68–
Region 9]
Revisions to California State
Implementation Plan; Bay Area Air
Quality Management District; Emission
Reduction Credit Banking
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing action on a
revision to the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD or
District) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). We are
proposing a conditional approval of one
rule. This revision consists of updates to
provisions governing the issuance and
banking of Emission Reduction Credits
for use in the review and permitting of
major sources and major modifications
under part D of title I of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). We are taking comments on
this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
October 16, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2017–0130 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be removed or edited from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, (415)
972–3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. What is the existing BAAQMD rule
governing banking of Emission
Reduction Credits in the California SIP?
C. What is the purpose of this proposed
rule?
II. EPA’s Evaluation
A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
On April 22, 2013, the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) submitted an
amended rule, BAAQMD Regulation 2,
Rule 4 (Rule 2–4), for approval as a
revision to the BAAQMD portion of the
California SIP under the CAA.
Regulation 2 contains the District’s air
quality permitting programs. Rule 2–4
contains requirements applicable to the
banking of Emission Reduction Credits
(ERCs) for use in the District’s air
quality permitting programs.
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the dates that it was
adopted by BAAQMD and submitted to
the EPA by CARB, which is the
governor’s designee for California SIP
submittals.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43199-43202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19111]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 30
[178A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]
Bureau of Indian Education Standards, Assessments, and
Accountability System Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Establishment;
Nominations
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Request for nominations and notice of intent to establish
committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Interior is announcing its intent
to establish the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) Standards,
Assessments, and Accountability System Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
(Committee) to advise the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) through
the BIE on a proposed rule to revise the Adequate Yearly Progress
regulation and invite Tribes whose students attend BIE-funded schools
operated by either the BIE or by the Tribe through a contract or grant
who would be affected by the final rule to nominate a representative
for membership on the Committee. The BIE also invites nominations for
Committee members who will adequately represent the interests that are
likely to be significantly affected by the proposed rule such as:
Students enrolled, or parents of students enrolled at the 174 BIE-
funded schools, school teachers and administrators, Tribes, and Indian
communities served by these schools. The BIE also solicits comments on
the proposal to establish the Committee.
DATES: Comments regarding the intent to establish this Committee and
nominations for Committee members must be submitted no later than
October 16, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ms. Juanita Mendoza, Bureau of
Indian Education, by any of the following methods:
(Preferred method) Email to: BIEcomments@bia.gov;
Mail, hand-carry or use an overnight courier service to
Ms. Juanita Mendoza, Bureau of Indian Education, 1849 C Street NW.,
Mail Stop 4657, Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Juanita Mendoza, Bureau of Indian
Education; telephone: (202) 208-3559.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 2005, BIA promulgated regulations at 25 CFR part 30 that require
BIE to use the accountability system of the State in which a BIE-funded
school is located. There are BIE-funded schools in 23 different States;
and each State has its own accountability system. As a result, each
State system produced student achievement data that cannot be directly
compared with data from other States. This created problems for the BIE
in identifying under-performing schools and in directing resources
effectively.
On November 9, 2015, BIE published a notice of intent requesting
nominations for a negotiated rulemaking committee to recommend
revisions to the existing regulations for BIE's accountability system
(80 FR 69161). In that notice of intent, the BIE solicited nominations
from Tribes whose students attend BIE-funded schools operated either by
the BIE or by the Tribe through a contract or grant, to nominate Tribal
representatives to serve on the Committee and Tribal alternates to
serve when the representative is unavailable.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), Pub. L. 114-95, then became
law, requiring an update to the subject, scope, and issues that the
Committee would address. On April 14, 2016 (81 FR 22039), BIE announced
its intent to expand the scope of the Committee and reopened the
comment and nomination period, requesting comments and nominations by
May 31, 2016. The request for nominations was extended on August 17,
2016 (81 FR 54768). On January 18, 2017 a notice of proposed
membership, request for nomination and a request for comments was
published (82 FR 5473).
Taking into consideration the interests of the new Administration
in participating in this process, the Department has decided that a new
negotiated rulemaking process, as required by the ESEA, should begin.
Under ESEA Section 8204(c)(2), as amended, Tribes have the
authority to waive, in part or in whole, the definitions of standards,
assessments, and accountability system established by the Secretary in
accordance with this rulemaking. The BIE encourages Tribal self-
determination in Native education; and where a Tribal governing body or
school board determines it to be appropriate, encourages the
development of alternative standards, assessments, or accountability
systems.
The Committee would be charged, consistent with ESEA Section 8204,
with developing proposed regulations for implementation of the
Secretary's
[[Page 43200]]
responsibility to define standards, assessments, and an accountability
system. These definitions will be implemented in the 2018-2019 school
year. The final regulations will describe how to execute the
Secretary's responsibility to define the standards, assessments, and an
accountability system consistent with ESEA Section 1111, for schools
funded by the BIE on a national, regional, or Tribal basis, as
appropriate, taking into account the unique circumstances and needs of
such schools and the students served by such schools. Additionally, the
Committee will be asked to provide recommendations that encourage the
exercise of the authority of Tribes to adopt their own standards,
assessments, and an accountability system and also to provide
recommendations on how BIE could best provide technical assistance
under ESEA Section 8204(c)(3).
II. Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
The ESSA reauthorizes and amends the ESEA. ESSA Section 8007 amends
ESEA Section 8204, and directs the Secretary of the Interior, in
consultation with the Secretary of Education, if so requested, to use a
negotiated rulemaking process to develop regulations for implementation
of the Secretary of the Interior's obligation to define the standards,
assessments, and an accountability system that will be utilized at BIE-
funded schools. The regulations, along with any necessary revisions to
part 30 generally, will replace the existing 25 CFR part 30 and will
define the standards, assessments, and an accountability system
consistent with ESEA, for BIE-funded schools on a national, regional,
or Tribal basis. The regulations will be developed in a manner that
considers the unique circumstances and needs of such schools and the
students served by such schools. These definitions will be implemented
in the 2018-2019 school year.
ESEA Section 8204 also provides that if a Tribal governing body or
school board of a BIE-funded school determines the requirements
established by the Secretary of the Interior are inappropriate, they
may waive, in part or in whole, such requirements. Where such
requirements are waived, the Tribal governing body or school board
shall, within 60 days, submit to the Secretary of the Interior a
proposal for alternative standards, assessments, and an accountability
system, if applicable, consistent with ESEA Section 1111. The proposal
must take into account the unique circumstances and needs of the school
or schools and the students served. The proposal will be approved by
the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Education, unless
the Secretary of Education determines that the standards, assessments,
and accountability system do not meet the requirements of ESEA Section
1111. Additionally, a Tribal governing body or school board of a BIE-
funded school seeking a waiver may request, and the Secretary of the
Interior and the Secretary of Education will provide, technical
assistance.
III. Statutory Authority
This document is published in accordance with the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C. 561 et seq.); the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2); and the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.)
IV. The Committee and Its Process
In negotiated rulemaking, recommended provisions of a proposed rule
are developed by a committee composed of at least one representative of
the Federal Government and representatives of the interests that will
be significantly affected by the rule. Decisions are made by consensus,
which means unanimous concurrence among the interests represented on
the Committee, unless the Committee agrees to define ``consensus'' to
mean a general but not unanimous concurrence, or agrees upon another
specified definition. 5 U.S.C. 562(2)(A) and (B).
As part of the negotiated rulemaking process, the BIE has
identified interests potentially affected by the rulemaking under
consideration, including students enrolled at 174 BIE-funded schools,
parents of such students, school administrators, Tribes, and the Indian
communities served by these schools. By this notice of intent, the BIE
is soliciting: (1) Comments on its proposal to form a negotiated
rulemaking committee; and (2) nominations for Committee members who
will adequately represent the interests that are likely to be
significantly affected by the proposed rule.
Following the receipt of nominations and comments, BIE will publish
a second notice in the Federal Register with a list of persons to
represent the interests that are likely to be significantly affected by
the rule and the person or persons proposed to represent the BIE.
Persons who will be significantly affected by the proposed rule and who
believe that their interests will not be adequately represented by any
person specified in that second Federal Register notice will be given
an opportunity to apply or nominate another person for membership on
the Committee to represent such interests with respect to the proposed
rule.
Following the second Federal Register notice and responses to it,
BIE expects to establish the Committee. After the Committee reaches
consensus on the recommended provisions of the proposed rule, as
discussed in more detail below, the BIE will publish a proposed rule in
the Federal Register.
Under 5 U.S.C. 563, the head of the agency is required to determine
that the use of the negotiated rulemaking procedure is in the public
interest.
In making such a determination, the agency head must consider
certain factors. Taking these factors into account, the Secretary,
through the authority delegated to the Assistant Secretary--Indian
Affairs, has determined that a negotiated rulemaking is in the public
interest because:
1. A rule is needed. The ESEA directs the Secretary to conduct a
negotiated rulemaking pursuant to the NRA.
2. A limited number of identifiable interests will be significantly
affected by the rule. The 174 BIE-funded schools, students enrolled at
these schools, school teachers and administrators, Tribes, and Indian
communities served by these schools will be significantly affected by
this review and the recommendations made by this Committee.
3. There is a reasonable likelihood that the Committee can be
convened with a balanced representation of persons who can adequately
represent the interests discussed in item 2, above, and who are willing
to negotiate in good faith to attempt to reach a consensus on
provisions of a proposed rule.
4. There is a reasonable likelihood that the Committee will reach
consensus on a proposed rule within a fixed period of time.
5. The use of negotiated rulemaking will not delay the development
of a proposed rule because time limits will be placed on the
negotiation. We anticipate that these negotiations will expedite a
proposed rule and ultimately the acceptance of a final rule.
6. The BIE is making a commitment to ensure that the Committee has
sufficient resources to complete its work in a timely fashion.
7. The BIE, to the maximum extent possible and consistent with the
legal obligations of the Agency, will use the consensus report of the
Committee as the basis for a proposed rule for public notice and
comment.
V. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with FACA and NRA, the BIE will use the following
[[Page 43201]]
procedures and guidelines for this negotiated rulemaking. The BIE may
modify them in response to comments received on this notice of intent
or during the negotiation process.
A. Committee Formation
The Committee will be formed and operated in full compliance with
the requirements of FACA and NRA, and specifically under the guidelines
of its charter.
B. Membership Responsibility
The Committee is expected to meet approximately 3-5 times and will
last 2-3 days each. The initial meeting will be in person; some later
meetings may be held by teleconference and/or web conference. The
Committee's work is expected to occur over the course of 6-12 months.
However, the Committee may continue its work for up to two years.
Because of the scope and complexity of the tasks at hand, Committee
members must be able to invest considerable time and effort in the
negotiated rulemaking process. Committee members must be able to attend
all Committee meetings, work on Committee work groups, consult with
their constituencies between Committee meetings, and negotiate in good
faith toward a consensus on issues before the Committee. Because of the
complexity of the issues under consideration, as well as the need for
continuity, the Secretary reserves the right to replace any member who
is unable to participate in the Committee's meetings.
Responsibility for expenses under 5 U.S.C. 568(c) is as follows:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking committee shall be responsible
for their own expenses of participation in such committee, except that
an Agency may, in accordance with Section 7(d) of the FACA, pay for a
member's reasonable travel and per diem expenses, expenses to obtain
technical assistance, and a reasonable rate of compensation, if--
1. Such member certifies a lack of adequate financial resources to
participate in the Committee; and
2. The agency determines that such member's participation in the
Committee is necessary to assure an adequate representation of the
member's interest.
The BIE commits to pay the reasonable travel and per diem expenses
of Committee members, if appropriate, under the NRA and Federal travel
regulations.
C. Composition of Committee
The Secretary is seeking nominations for representatives to serve
on the Committee who can represent the interests of students enrolled
at the 174 BIE-funded schools, parents of such students, school
administrators, Tribes, and the Indian communities served by these
schools, and who have a demonstrated ability to communicate well with
groups about the interests they will represent. The Committee
membership will consist of approximately 15, but not more than 25
members in accordance with the NRA.
Non-Federal Committee membership must:
Include only representatives of the interests described
above;
Comply with the FACA.
41 CFR 102-3.30 requires the membership of a FACA committee to be
fairly balanced in its member in terms of the points of view
represented and the functions to be performed. In making membership
decisions, the Secretary shall consider whether the interest
represented by a nominee will be affected significantly by the final
products of the Committee, which may include report(s) and/or proposed
regulations; whether that interest is already adequately represented by
nominees; and whether the potential addition would adequately represent
that interest.
Federally registered lobbyists are ineligible to serve on all FACA
and non-FACA boards, committees, or councils in an individual capacity.
The term ``individual capacity'' refers to individuals who are
appointed to exercise their own individual best judgment on behalf of
the government, such as when they are designated Special Government
Employees, rather than being appointed to represent a particular
interest.
D. Administrative and Technical Support
The BIE will provide sufficient administrative and technical
resources for the Committee to complete its work in a timely fashion.
The BIE, with the help of the facilitator, will prepare and provide a
final report of any issues on which the Committee reaches consensus.
E. Training and Organization
At the first meeting of the Committee, a neutral facilitator will
provide training on negotiated rulemaking, interest-based negotiations,
and consensus-building. In addition, at the first meeting, Committee
members will make organizational decisions concerning protocols,
scheduling, and facilitation of the Committee.
F. Interests Identified
Under Section 562 of the NRA, ``interest'' means, with respect to
an issue or matter, multiple parties which have a similar point of view
or which are likely to be affected in a similar manner.' The BIE has
identified the interests to be significantly affected by this new rule
to include students enrolled at 174 BIE-funded schools, parents of such
students, school administrators, Tribes, and the Indian communities
served by these schools. The BIE is accepting comments identifying
other interests that may be significantly affected by the final
products of the Committee, which may include report(s) and/or proposed
regulations, until the date listed in the DATES section of this notice
of intent.
VI. Nominations
The BIE solicits nominations from representatives of the interests
identified above and an alternate to serve when the representative is
unavailable.
Each nomination is expected to include a nomination for a primary
representative and an alternate who can fulfill the obligations of
membership should the primary representative be unable to attend. The
Committee membership should reflect a diversity of interests, and
nominees should only be of representatives and alternates who will:
Have knowledge of school standards, assessments and
accountability systems;
Have relevant experience as past or present
superintendents, principals, teachers, or school board members;
Be able to coordinate, to the extent possible, with other
interests who may not be represented on the Committee;
Be able to represent one or more of the specified
interests with the authority to embody the views of that interest,
communicate with interested constituents, and have a clear means to
reach agreement on behalf of the interest(s);
Be able to negotiate effectively on behalf of the
interest(s) represented;
Be able to commit the time and effort required to attend
and prepare for meetings; and
Be able to collaborate among diverse parties in a
consensus-seeking process.
The BIE will consider nominations for representatives only if they
are nominated through the process identified in this Notice of Intent.
The BIE will not consider any nominations that we receive in any other
manner. If you submitted a nomination in response
[[Page 43202]]
to previous notices (80 FR 69161; 81 FR 22039; 81 FR 54768; 82 FR 5473)
you must submit a new nomination package. Previous applications will
not be considered. The BIE will not consider nominations for Federal
representatives. Only the Secretary may nominate Federal employees to
the Committee.
Nominations must include the following information about each
nominee:
(1) A current letter from the entity representing one of the
interest(s) identified supporting the nomination of the individual to
serve as a representative for the Committee;
(2) A resume reflecting the nominee's qualifications and experience
in Indian education; resume to include the nominee's name, Tribal
affiliation (if applicable), job title, major job duties, employer,
business address, business telephone and fax numbers (and business
email address, if applicable);
(3) The interest(s) to be represented by the nominee (see section
V, part F) and whether the nominee will represent other interest(s)
related to this rulemaking; and
(4) A brief description of how the nominee will represent the views
of the identified interest(s), communicate with constituents, and have
a clear means to reach agreement on behalf of the interest(s) they are
representing.
(5) A statement on whether the nominee is only representing one
interest or whether the expectation is that the nominee represents a
specific group of interests.
To be considered, nominations must be received by the close of
business on the date listed in the DATES section, at the location
indicated in the ADDRESSES section.
Public Availability of Comments: Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--
including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
VII. Certification
For the above reasons, I hereby certify that the Bureau of Indian
Education Standards, Assessments, and Accountability System Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee is in the public interest.
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6301; 5 U.S.C. 561; 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.
Dated: September 1, 2017.
Michael S. Black,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-19111 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P