Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine Falcons for Use in Falconry, 42700-42701 [2017-19140]

Download as PDF asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES 42700 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices a DDA in 2019 or 2020. A complete application for tax-exempt bond financing for Project D is filed with the bond-issuing agency on October 30, 2018. Bonds are issued for Project D on April 30, 2020, but Project D is not placed in service until January 30, 2021. Project D is eligible for the increase in basis available to projects located in 2018 DDAs because: (1) One of the two events necessary for triggering the effective date for buildings described in section 42(h)(4)(B) of the IRC (the two events being bonds issued and buildings placed in service) took place on April 30, 2020, within the 730-day period after a complete application for taxexempt bond financing was filed, (2) the application was filed during a time when the location of Project D was in a DDA, and (3) both the issuance of the bonds and placement in service of Project D occurred after the application was submitted. (Case E) Project E is a multiphase project located in a 2018 DDA that is NOT a designated DDA or QCT in 2019. The first phase of Project E received an allocation of credits in 2018, pursuant to an application filed March 15, 2018, which describes the multiphase composition of the project. An application for tax credits for the second phase of Project E is filed with the allocating agency by the same entity on March 15, 2019. The second phase of Project E is located on a contiguous site. Credits are allocated to the second phase of Project E on October 30, 2019. The aggregate amount of credits allocated to the two phases of Project E exceeds the amount of credits that may be allocated to an applicant in one year under the allocating agency’s QAP and is the reason that applications were made in multiple phases. The second phase of Project E is, therefore, eligible for the increase in basis accorded a project in a 2018 DDA, because it meets all of the conditions to be a part of a multiphase project. (Case F) Project F is a multiphase project located in a 2018 DDA that is NOT a designated DDA in 2019 or 2020. The first phase of Project F received an allocation of credits in 2018, pursuant to an application filed March 15, 2018, which does not describe the multiphase composition of the project. An application for tax credits for the second phase of Project F is filed with the allocating agency by the same entity on March 15, 2020. Credits are allocated to the second phase of Project F on October 30, 2020. The aggregate amount of credits allocated to the two phases of Project F exceeds the amount of credits that may be allocated to an applicant in one year under the allocating agency’s VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Sep 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 QAP. The second phase of Project F is, therefore, NOT eligible for the increase in basis accorded a project in a 2018 DDA, since it does not meet all of the conditions for a multiphase project, as defined in this notice. The original application for credits for the first phase did not describe the multiphase composition of the project. Also, the application for credits for the second phase of Project F was not made in the year immediately following the first phase application year. X. Environmental Impact This notice involves the establishment of fiscal requirements or procedures that are related to rate and cost determinations and do not constitute a development decision affecting the physical condition of specific project areas or building sites. Accordingly, under 40 CFR 1508.4 of the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality and 24 CFR 50.19(c)(6) of HUD’s regulations, this notice is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321). Dated: August 29, 2017. Todd M. Richardson, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. [FR Doc. 2017–19188 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–HQ–MB–2017–N136; FF09M21200– 178–FXMB1232099BPP0L2] Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine Falcons for Use in Falconry Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In December 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service completed an environmental assessment (EA) on the take of peregrine falcons for use in falconry. In 2009 and 2010, we published notices in the Federal Register describing the take limits and geographic allocation of take for firstyear fall-migrant (passage) peregrine falcons consistent with the selected alternative in that EA. The overall take limits have remained constant since 2009. This notice is to inform the public that, at the request of the Atlantic, Mississippi and Central Flyway Councils, we have reviewed recent data SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and are revising the take limits for passage peregrine falcons beginning in the fall of 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at 505–761–4724; brian_ millsap@fws.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The authority of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to govern take of raptors and other migratory birds is derived from the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703–712). In carrying out this responsibility, we have administratively divided the Nation into four Flyways: Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific. Each Flyway has a Flyway Council that assists in researching and providing migratory game bird management information. The Federal regulations to carry out the MBTA are located in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The MBTA prohibits any person from, among other things, taking, possessing, purchasing, bartering, selling, or offering to purchase, barter, or sell, raptors (birds of prey) and other migratory birds listed in 50 CFR 10.13, unless the activities are allowed under Federal regulations. Take and possession of raptors for use in falconry is governed by regulations at 50 CFR 21.29. Under the provisions of the Federal falconry regulations, the Service administers a program to approve State, tribal, and territorial falconry programs. Since January 1, 2014, the 48 continental States and Alaska all have approved falconry regulatory programs, and the Service no longer issues permits for the practice of falconry. We completed an environmental assessment (EA) on take of migrant peregrine falcons in 2008 (see 73 FR 74508, December 8, 2008). Our preferred alternative at that time allowed a take of 36 passage peregrine falcons from September 20 through October 20 from anywhere in the United States east of 100 degrees W. longitude. Allocation of the 36 passage peregrine falcons was agreed upon by the Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils. Our management strategy analyzed in the preferred alternative in the 2008 EA incorporated three important safeguards to ensure against negative impacts from authorized falconry take on peregrine falcons across their range. First, we constrained the timing and location of the falconry captures to focus the take on the northern peregrine E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM 11SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES falcon management population (i.e., those birds originating from natal areas north of 54 degrees N. latitude), which was known to be healthy and able to sustain take. We constrained captures in this way to minimize take from the eastern and western management populations (i.e., those originating from sites east and west, respectively, of 100 degrees W. longitude and south of 54 degrees N. latitude), which were still recovering from the negative population-level effects of pesticide contamination. We committed to evaluate whether our management strategy effectively focused take on the northern management population by collecting feathers from falconercaptured passage peregrine falcons, and analyzing deuterium levels in those feathers to estimate the latitude of origin. Second, because we lacked credible estimates of the size of the northern passage peregrine falcon population in 2008, we consulted with the Canadian Wildlife Service and adopted an extremely conservative estimate of the number (i.e., 3,590) of passage peregrine falcons for the northern management population. We derived this estimate from the number of known breeding pairs in the Arctic. Finally, in our EA and in subsequent Federal Register notices (74 FR 36253, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 56555, September 16, 2010), we committed to reviewing data on peregrine falcons in the future at the request of the Flyway Councils to reassess the allowable take limits if data required or supported a change. New Information We have reviewed two recent scientific analyses that provide important new information relevant to the take of passage peregrine falcons. First, Franke (2016) used a markrecapture model to generate an improved data-based estimate of the average number of passage peregrine falcons produced in the northern management population annually. Franke’s (2016) data-based estimate of 21,000 is more than five times greater than the number we used to set take limits in the 2008 EA. Second, the Service and cooperators completed the analysis of deuterium levels in passage peregrine falcons captured in fall within the prescribed take area. The deuterium level analysis shows that the management strategy outlined in the 2008 EA is likely resulting in more than 75 percent of the falconer take coming from the northern peregrine falcon management population (Franke et al. 2017). This outcome is more protective than the objective outlined in the 2008 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Sep 08, 2017 Jkt 241001 EA, which was that at least 65 percent of the passage peregrine falcons taken by falconers must originate from the northern management population. Overall, peregrine falcon populations remain healthy across North America, and indices such as the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) show the continental population increasing (BBS index for the period 2005–2015 = 6.4 percent per year, with a 95 percent credible interval of 0.45–13.45 percent) and no regional populations appear to be declining (Sauer et al. 2017). The Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils reviewed this new information in 2017 and formally requested that we reevaluate and revise the passage peregrine falcon take limits based on the updated estimate of the number of passage peregrine falcons produced annually in the northern management population. Further, the Flyway Councils requested that we use the 10th quantile (i.e., 18,000) of the probability distribution for the updated mean annual number of passage peregrine falcons exposed to take rather than the mean value (i.e., 21,000). By using the 10th quantile, we expect there to be a 90 percent chance that the actual number is larger and, therefore, that we remain protective against overexploitation and account for the uncertainty in the production estimate. We undertook the analyses requested by the Flyway Councils by substituting 18,000 (the updated production estimate for the northern peregrine falcon management population) for 3,590 (the production estimate used in the 2008 EA) in the same models and using the same population-specific take rates as specified under the preferred alternative in the 2008 EA. The updated analysis indicates that 144 passage peregrine falcons may be taken annually by falconers east of the 100th meridian between September 20 and October 20 consistent with the management strategy and the objectives of the selected alternative in the 2008 EA. In accordance with these findings, and consistent with the Flyway Councils’ request, this notice announces that the annual take limits for passage peregrine falcons starting in the fall of 2017 will increase from 36 to 144, to be divided equally between the Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyways (i.e., 48 per flyway). The sole basis for this increase is the updated estimate for the northern management population. Thus, we consider this increase to be a technical update to incorporate new and better data. All other provisions outlined in the 2008 EA remain in effect (e.g., the take rates and management objectives PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42701 are unchanged, the take season remains September 20 to October 20 annually, and the take of passage peregrine falcons is restricted to areas in the United States east of 100 degrees W. longitude). Therefore, the environmental impact of authorizing take of passage peregrine falcons under the preferred alternative will remain unchanged from that analyzed in the 2008 EA. Because this assessment addresses only take east of 100 degrees W. longitude, the general provisions for take of peregrine falcons west of 100 degrees W. longitude remain as described in our 2010 Federal Register notice (75 FR 56555, September 16, 2010). We will continue to review peregrine falcon population and take data for Canada, the United States, and Mexico every 5 years, or at the request of the Flyway Councils, to reassess the allowable take limits. We will publish a notice in the Federal Register if we determine that the take limits for peregrine falcons should be changed again in the future. Literature Cited Franke, A. 2016. Population estimates for Northern juvenile peregrine falcons with implications for harvest levels in North America. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7:36–45. Franke, A., J. Duxbury, H. Qi, T. Coplen, G.L. Holroyd, and B.A. Millsap. 2017. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report: hydrogen stable isotope analysis of peregrine falcons in the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, DC. Sauer, J.R., D.K. Niven, J.E. Hines, D.J. Ziolkowski, K.L. Pardieck, J.E. Fallon, and W.A. Link. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2015, Version 2.07.2017. https://www.mbrpwrc.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/atlasa15. pl?03560&1&15&csrfmiddlewaretoken=3 YKakk7LxT2ki6NSpl4mstudYCqdW02C. Dated: August 24, 2017. Gregory J. Sheehan, Principal Deputy Director,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2017–19140 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs [178A2100DD/AAKC001030/ A0A501010.999900 253G] Advisory Board for Exceptional Children; Public Meeting AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM 11SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42700-42701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19140]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-HQ-MB-2017-N136; FF09M21200-178-FXMB1232099BPP0L2]


Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine Falcons for Use in Falconry

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In December 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service completed 
an environmental assessment (EA) on the take of peregrine falcons for 
use in falconry. In 2009 and 2010, we published notices in the Federal 
Register describing the take limits and geographic allocation of take 
for first-year fall-migrant (passage) peregrine falcons consistent with 
the selected alternative in that EA. The overall take limits have 
remained constant since 2009. This notice is to inform the public that, 
at the request of the Atlantic, Mississippi and Central Flyway 
Councils, we have reviewed recent data and are revising the take limits 
for passage peregrine falcons beginning in the fall of 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor 
Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, at 505-761-4724; brian_millsap@fws.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The authority of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to govern take 
of raptors and other migratory birds is derived from the Migratory Bird 
Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703-712). In carrying out this 
responsibility, we have administratively divided the Nation into four 
Flyways: Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific. Each Flyway has a 
Flyway Council that assists in researching and providing migratory game 
bird management information. The Federal regulations to carry out the 
MBTA are located in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The MBTA prohibits any person from, among other things, taking, 
possessing, purchasing, bartering, selling, or offering to purchase, 
barter, or sell, raptors (birds of prey) and other migratory birds 
listed in 50 CFR 10.13, unless the activities are allowed under Federal 
regulations. Take and possession of raptors for use in falconry is 
governed by regulations at 50 CFR 21.29. Under the provisions of the 
Federal falconry regulations, the Service administers a program to 
approve State, tribal, and territorial falconry programs. Since January 
1, 2014, the 48 continental States and Alaska all have approved 
falconry regulatory programs, and the Service no longer issues permits 
for the practice of falconry.
    We completed an environmental assessment (EA) on take of migrant 
peregrine falcons in 2008 (see 73 FR 74508, December 8, 2008). Our 
preferred alternative at that time allowed a take of 36 passage 
peregrine falcons from September 20 through October 20 from anywhere in 
the United States east of 100 degrees W. longitude. Allocation of the 
36 passage peregrine falcons was agreed upon by the Atlantic, 
Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils. Our management strategy 
analyzed in the preferred alternative in the 2008 EA incorporated three 
important safeguards to ensure against negative impacts from authorized 
falconry take on peregrine falcons across their range.
    First, we constrained the timing and location of the falconry 
captures to focus the take on the northern peregrine

[[Page 42701]]

falcon management population (i.e., those birds originating from natal 
areas north of 54 degrees N. latitude), which was known to be healthy 
and able to sustain take. We constrained captures in this way to 
minimize take from the eastern and western management populations 
(i.e., those originating from sites east and west, respectively, of 100 
degrees W. longitude and south of 54 degrees N. latitude), which were 
still recovering from the negative population-level effects of 
pesticide contamination. We committed to evaluate whether our 
management strategy effectively focused take on the northern management 
population by collecting feathers from falconer-captured passage 
peregrine falcons, and analyzing deuterium levels in those feathers to 
estimate the latitude of origin.
    Second, because we lacked credible estimates of the size of the 
northern passage peregrine falcon population in 2008, we consulted with 
the Canadian Wildlife Service and adopted an extremely conservative 
estimate of the number (i.e., 3,590) of passage peregrine falcons for 
the northern management population. We derived this estimate from the 
number of known breeding pairs in the Arctic.
    Finally, in our EA and in subsequent Federal Register notices (74 
FR 36253, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 56555, September 16, 2010), we committed 
to reviewing data on peregrine falcons in the future at the request of 
the Flyway Councils to reassess the allowable take limits if data 
required or supported a change.

New Information

    We have reviewed two recent scientific analyses that provide 
important new information relevant to the take of passage peregrine 
falcons. First, Franke (2016) used a mark-recapture model to generate 
an improved data-based estimate of the average number of passage 
peregrine falcons produced in the northern management population 
annually. Franke's (2016) data-based estimate of 21,000 is more than 
five times greater than the number we used to set take limits in the 
2008 EA. Second, the Service and cooperators completed the analysis of 
deuterium levels in passage peregrine falcons captured in fall within 
the prescribed take area. The deuterium level analysis shows that the 
management strategy outlined in the 2008 EA is likely resulting in more 
than 75 percent of the falconer take coming from the northern peregrine 
falcon management population (Franke et al. 2017). This outcome is more 
protective than the objective outlined in the 2008 EA, which was that 
at least 65 percent of the passage peregrine falcons taken by falconers 
must originate from the northern management population. Overall, 
peregrine falcon populations remain healthy across North America, and 
indices such as the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) show the continental 
population increasing (BBS index for the period 2005-2015 = 6.4 percent 
per year, with a 95 percent credible interval of 0.45-13.45 percent) 
and no regional populations appear to be declining (Sauer et al. 2017).
    The Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils reviewed 
this new information in 2017 and formally requested that we reevaluate 
and revise the passage peregrine falcon take limits based on the 
updated estimate of the number of passage peregrine falcons produced 
annually in the northern management population. Further, the Flyway 
Councils requested that we use the 10th quantile (i.e., 18,000) of the 
probability distribution for the updated mean annual number of passage 
peregrine falcons exposed to take rather than the mean value (i.e., 
21,000). By using the 10th quantile, we expect there to be a 90 percent 
chance that the actual number is larger and, therefore, that we remain 
protective against overexploitation and account for the uncertainty in 
the production estimate. We undertook the analyses requested by the 
Flyway Councils by substituting 18,000 (the updated production estimate 
for the northern peregrine falcon management population) for 3,590 (the 
production estimate used in the 2008 EA) in the same models and using 
the same population-specific take rates as specified under the 
preferred alternative in the 2008 EA.
    The updated analysis indicates that 144 passage peregrine falcons 
may be taken annually by falconers east of the 100th meridian between 
September 20 and October 20 consistent with the management strategy and 
the objectives of the selected alternative in the 2008 EA. In 
accordance with these findings, and consistent with the Flyway 
Councils' request, this notice announces that the annual take limits 
for passage peregrine falcons starting in the fall of 2017 will 
increase from 36 to 144, to be divided equally between the Atlantic, 
Mississippi, and Central Flyways (i.e., 48 per flyway).
    The sole basis for this increase is the updated estimate for the 
northern management population. Thus, we consider this increase to be a 
technical update to incorporate new and better data. All other 
provisions outlined in the 2008 EA remain in effect (e.g., the take 
rates and management objectives are unchanged, the take season remains 
September 20 to October 20 annually, and the take of passage peregrine 
falcons is restricted to areas in the United States east of 100 degrees 
W. longitude). Therefore, the environmental impact of authorizing take 
of passage peregrine falcons under the preferred alternative will 
remain unchanged from that analyzed in the 2008 EA. Because this 
assessment addresses only take east of 100 degrees W. longitude, the 
general provisions for take of peregrine falcons west of 100 degrees W. 
longitude remain as described in our 2010 Federal Register notice (75 
FR 56555, September 16, 2010).
    We will continue to review peregrine falcon population and take 
data for Canada, the United States, and Mexico every 5 years, or at the 
request of the Flyway Councils, to reassess the allowable take limits. 
We will publish a notice in the Federal Register if we determine that 
the take limits for peregrine falcons should be changed again in the 
future.

Literature Cited

Franke, A. 2016. Population estimates for Northern juvenile 
peregrine falcons with implications for harvest levels in North 
America. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7:36-45.
Franke, A., J. Duxbury, H. Qi, T. Coplen, G.L. Holroyd, and B.A. 
Millsap. 2017. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report: hydrogen 
stable isotope analysis of peregrine falcons in the United States. 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird 
Management, Washington, DC.
Sauer, J.R., D.K. Niven, J.E. Hines, D.J. Ziolkowski, K.L. Pardieck, 
J.E. Fallon, and W.A. Link. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird 
Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2015, Version 2.07.2017. https://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/atlasa15.pl?03560&1&15&csrfmiddlewaretoken=3YKakk7LxT2ki6NSpl4mstudYCqdW02C.

    Dated: August 24, 2017.
Gregory J. Sheehan,
Principal Deputy Director,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-19140 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.