Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine Falcons for Use in Falconry, 42700-42701 [2017-19140]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
42700
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices
a DDA in 2019 or 2020. A complete
application for tax-exempt bond
financing for Project D is filed with the
bond-issuing agency on October 30,
2018. Bonds are issued for Project D on
April 30, 2020, but Project D is not
placed in service until January 30, 2021.
Project D is eligible for the increase in
basis available to projects located in
2018 DDAs because: (1) One of the two
events necessary for triggering the
effective date for buildings described in
section 42(h)(4)(B) of the IRC (the two
events being bonds issued and buildings
placed in service) took place on April
30, 2020, within the 730-day period
after a complete application for taxexempt bond financing was filed, (2) the
application was filed during a time
when the location of Project D was in a
DDA, and (3) both the issuance of the
bonds and placement in service of
Project D occurred after the application
was submitted.
(Case E) Project E is a multiphase
project located in a 2018 DDA that is
NOT a designated DDA or QCT in 2019.
The first phase of Project E received an
allocation of credits in 2018, pursuant to
an application filed March 15, 2018,
which describes the multiphase
composition of the project. An
application for tax credits for the second
phase of Project E is filed with the
allocating agency by the same entity on
March 15, 2019. The second phase of
Project E is located on a contiguous site.
Credits are allocated to the second
phase of Project E on October 30, 2019.
The aggregate amount of credits
allocated to the two phases of Project E
exceeds the amount of credits that may
be allocated to an applicant in one year
under the allocating agency’s QAP and
is the reason that applications were
made in multiple phases. The second
phase of Project E is, therefore, eligible
for the increase in basis accorded a
project in a 2018 DDA, because it meets
all of the conditions to be a part of a
multiphase project.
(Case F) Project F is a multiphase
project located in a 2018 DDA that is
NOT a designated DDA in 2019 or 2020.
The first phase of Project F received an
allocation of credits in 2018, pursuant to
an application filed March 15, 2018,
which does not describe the multiphase
composition of the project. An
application for tax credits for the second
phase of Project F is filed with the
allocating agency by the same entity on
March 15, 2020. Credits are allocated to
the second phase of Project F on
October 30, 2020. The aggregate amount
of credits allocated to the two phases of
Project F exceeds the amount of credits
that may be allocated to an applicant in
one year under the allocating agency’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Sep 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
QAP. The second phase of Project F is,
therefore, NOT eligible for the increase
in basis accorded a project in a 2018
DDA, since it does not meet all of the
conditions for a multiphase project, as
defined in this notice. The original
application for credits for the first phase
did not describe the multiphase
composition of the project. Also, the
application for credits for the second
phase of Project F was not made in the
year immediately following the first
phase application year.
X. Environmental Impact
This notice involves the
establishment of fiscal requirements or
procedures that are related to rate and
cost determinations and do not
constitute a development decision
affecting the physical condition of
specific project areas or building sites.
Accordingly, under 40 CFR 1508.4 of
the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6) of HUD’s regulations, this
notice is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Dated: August 29, 2017.
Todd M. Richardson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy
Development, Office of Policy Development
and Research.
[FR Doc. 2017–19188 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–MB–2017–N136; FF09M21200–
178–FXMB1232099BPP0L2]
Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine
Falcons for Use in Falconry
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In December 2008, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service completed an
environmental assessment (EA) on the
take of peregrine falcons for use in
falconry. In 2009 and 2010, we
published notices in the Federal
Register describing the take limits and
geographic allocation of take for firstyear fall-migrant (passage) peregrine
falcons consistent with the selected
alternative in that EA. The overall take
limits have remained constant since
2009. This notice is to inform the public
that, at the request of the Atlantic,
Mississippi and Central Flyway
Councils, we have reviewed recent data
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and are revising the take limits for
passage peregrine falcons beginning in
the fall of 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor
Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, at 505–761–4724; brian_
millsap@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The authority of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to govern take of
raptors and other migratory birds is
derived from the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703–712). In
carrying out this responsibility, we have
administratively divided the Nation into
four Flyways: Atlantic, Mississippi,
Central, and Pacific. Each Flyway has a
Flyway Council that assists in
researching and providing migratory
game bird management information.
The Federal regulations to carry out the
MBTA are located in title 50 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
The MBTA prohibits any person from,
among other things, taking, possessing,
purchasing, bartering, selling, or
offering to purchase, barter, or sell,
raptors (birds of prey) and other
migratory birds listed in 50 CFR 10.13,
unless the activities are allowed under
Federal regulations. Take and
possession of raptors for use in falconry
is governed by regulations at 50 CFR
21.29. Under the provisions of the
Federal falconry regulations, the Service
administers a program to approve State,
tribal, and territorial falconry programs.
Since January 1, 2014, the 48
continental States and Alaska all have
approved falconry regulatory programs,
and the Service no longer issues permits
for the practice of falconry.
We completed an environmental
assessment (EA) on take of migrant
peregrine falcons in 2008 (see 73 FR
74508, December 8, 2008). Our preferred
alternative at that time allowed a take of
36 passage peregrine falcons from
September 20 through October 20 from
anywhere in the United States east of
100 degrees W. longitude. Allocation of
the 36 passage peregrine falcons was
agreed upon by the Atlantic,
Mississippi, and Central Flyway
Councils. Our management strategy
analyzed in the preferred alternative in
the 2008 EA incorporated three
important safeguards to ensure against
negative impacts from authorized
falconry take on peregrine falcons across
their range.
First, we constrained the timing and
location of the falconry captures to
focus the take on the northern peregrine
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
falcon management population (i.e.,
those birds originating from natal areas
north of 54 degrees N. latitude), which
was known to be healthy and able to
sustain take. We constrained captures in
this way to minimize take from the
eastern and western management
populations (i.e., those originating from
sites east and west, respectively, of 100
degrees W. longitude and south of 54
degrees N. latitude), which were still
recovering from the negative
population-level effects of pesticide
contamination. We committed to
evaluate whether our management
strategy effectively focused take on the
northern management population by
collecting feathers from falconercaptured passage peregrine falcons, and
analyzing deuterium levels in those
feathers to estimate the latitude of
origin.
Second, because we lacked credible
estimates of the size of the northern
passage peregrine falcon population in
2008, we consulted with the Canadian
Wildlife Service and adopted an
extremely conservative estimate of the
number (i.e., 3,590) of passage peregrine
falcons for the northern management
population. We derived this estimate
from the number of known breeding
pairs in the Arctic.
Finally, in our EA and in subsequent
Federal Register notices (74 FR 36253,
July 22, 2009; 75 FR 56555, September
16, 2010), we committed to reviewing
data on peregrine falcons in the future
at the request of the Flyway Councils to
reassess the allowable take limits if data
required or supported a change.
New Information
We have reviewed two recent
scientific analyses that provide
important new information relevant to
the take of passage peregrine falcons.
First, Franke (2016) used a markrecapture model to generate an
improved data-based estimate of the
average number of passage peregrine
falcons produced in the northern
management population annually.
Franke’s (2016) data-based estimate of
21,000 is more than five times greater
than the number we used to set take
limits in the 2008 EA. Second, the
Service and cooperators completed the
analysis of deuterium levels in passage
peregrine falcons captured in fall within
the prescribed take area. The deuterium
level analysis shows that the
management strategy outlined in the
2008 EA is likely resulting in more than
75 percent of the falconer take coming
from the northern peregrine falcon
management population (Franke et al.
2017). This outcome is more protective
than the objective outlined in the 2008
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Sep 08, 2017
Jkt 241001
EA, which was that at least 65 percent
of the passage peregrine falcons taken
by falconers must originate from the
northern management population.
Overall, peregrine falcon populations
remain healthy across North America,
and indices such as the Breeding Bird
Survey (BBS) show the continental
population increasing (BBS index for
the period 2005–2015 = 6.4 percent per
year, with a 95 percent credible interval
of 0.45–13.45 percent) and no regional
populations appear to be declining
(Sauer et al. 2017).
The Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central
Flyway Councils reviewed this new
information in 2017 and formally
requested that we reevaluate and revise
the passage peregrine falcon take limits
based on the updated estimate of the
number of passage peregrine falcons
produced annually in the northern
management population. Further, the
Flyway Councils requested that we use
the 10th quantile (i.e., 18,000) of the
probability distribution for the updated
mean annual number of passage
peregrine falcons exposed to take rather
than the mean value (i.e., 21,000). By
using the 10th quantile, we expect there
to be a 90 percent chance that the actual
number is larger and, therefore, that we
remain protective against
overexploitation and account for the
uncertainty in the production estimate.
We undertook the analyses requested by
the Flyway Councils by substituting
18,000 (the updated production estimate
for the northern peregrine falcon
management population) for 3,590 (the
production estimate used in the 2008
EA) in the same models and using the
same population-specific take rates as
specified under the preferred alternative
in the 2008 EA.
The updated analysis indicates that
144 passage peregrine falcons may be
taken annually by falconers east of the
100th meridian between September 20
and October 20 consistent with the
management strategy and the objectives
of the selected alternative in the 2008
EA. In accordance with these findings,
and consistent with the Flyway
Councils’ request, this notice announces
that the annual take limits for passage
peregrine falcons starting in the fall of
2017 will increase from 36 to 144, to be
divided equally between the Atlantic,
Mississippi, and Central Flyways (i.e.,
48 per flyway).
The sole basis for this increase is the
updated estimate for the northern
management population. Thus, we
consider this increase to be a technical
update to incorporate new and better
data. All other provisions outlined in
the 2008 EA remain in effect (e.g., the
take rates and management objectives
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42701
are unchanged, the take season remains
September 20 to October 20 annually,
and the take of passage peregrine
falcons is restricted to areas in the
United States east of 100 degrees W.
longitude). Therefore, the
environmental impact of authorizing
take of passage peregrine falcons under
the preferred alternative will remain
unchanged from that analyzed in the
2008 EA. Because this assessment
addresses only take east of 100 degrees
W. longitude, the general provisions for
take of peregrine falcons west of 100
degrees W. longitude remain as
described in our 2010 Federal Register
notice (75 FR 56555, September 16,
2010).
We will continue to review peregrine
falcon population and take data for
Canada, the United States, and Mexico
every 5 years, or at the request of the
Flyway Councils, to reassess the
allowable take limits. We will publish a
notice in the Federal Register if we
determine that the take limits for
peregrine falcons should be changed
again in the future.
Literature Cited
Franke, A. 2016. Population estimates for
Northern juvenile peregrine falcons with
implications for harvest levels in North
America. Journal of Fish and Wildlife
Management 7:36–45.
Franke, A., J. Duxbury, H. Qi, T. Coplen, G.L.
Holroyd, and B.A. Millsap. 2017. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service report:
hydrogen stable isotope analysis of
peregrine falcons in the United States.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division
of Migratory Bird Management,
Washington, DC.
Sauer, J.R., D.K. Niven, J.E. Hines, D.J.
Ziolkowski, K.L. Pardieck, J.E. Fallon,
and W.A. Link. 2017. The North
American Breeding Bird Survey, Results
and Analysis 1966–2015, Version
2.07.2017. https://www.mbrpwrc.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/atlasa15.
pl?03560&1&15&csrfmiddlewaretoken=3
YKakk7LxT2ki6NSpl4mstudYCqdW02C.
Dated: August 24, 2017.
Gregory J. Sheehan,
Principal Deputy Director,U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–19140 Filed 9–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[178A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Advisory Board for Exceptional
Children; Public Meeting
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42700-42701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19140]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-HQ-MB-2017-N136; FF09M21200-178-FXMB1232099BPP0L2]
Migratory Birds; Take of Peregrine Falcons for Use in Falconry
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In December 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service completed
an environmental assessment (EA) on the take of peregrine falcons for
use in falconry. In 2009 and 2010, we published notices in the Federal
Register describing the take limits and geographic allocation of take
for first-year fall-migrant (passage) peregrine falcons consistent with
the selected alternative in that EA. The overall take limits have
remained constant since 2009. This notice is to inform the public that,
at the request of the Atlantic, Mississippi and Central Flyway
Councils, we have reviewed recent data and are revising the take limits
for passage peregrine falcons beginning in the fall of 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian A. Millsap, National Raptor
Coordinator, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, at 505-761-4724; brian_millsap@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The authority of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to govern take
of raptors and other migratory birds is derived from the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703-712). In carrying out this
responsibility, we have administratively divided the Nation into four
Flyways: Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and Pacific. Each Flyway has a
Flyway Council that assists in researching and providing migratory game
bird management information. The Federal regulations to carry out the
MBTA are located in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
The MBTA prohibits any person from, among other things, taking,
possessing, purchasing, bartering, selling, or offering to purchase,
barter, or sell, raptors (birds of prey) and other migratory birds
listed in 50 CFR 10.13, unless the activities are allowed under Federal
regulations. Take and possession of raptors for use in falconry is
governed by regulations at 50 CFR 21.29. Under the provisions of the
Federal falconry regulations, the Service administers a program to
approve State, tribal, and territorial falconry programs. Since January
1, 2014, the 48 continental States and Alaska all have approved
falconry regulatory programs, and the Service no longer issues permits
for the practice of falconry.
We completed an environmental assessment (EA) on take of migrant
peregrine falcons in 2008 (see 73 FR 74508, December 8, 2008). Our
preferred alternative at that time allowed a take of 36 passage
peregrine falcons from September 20 through October 20 from anywhere in
the United States east of 100 degrees W. longitude. Allocation of the
36 passage peregrine falcons was agreed upon by the Atlantic,
Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils. Our management strategy
analyzed in the preferred alternative in the 2008 EA incorporated three
important safeguards to ensure against negative impacts from authorized
falconry take on peregrine falcons across their range.
First, we constrained the timing and location of the falconry
captures to focus the take on the northern peregrine
[[Page 42701]]
falcon management population (i.e., those birds originating from natal
areas north of 54 degrees N. latitude), which was known to be healthy
and able to sustain take. We constrained captures in this way to
minimize take from the eastern and western management populations
(i.e., those originating from sites east and west, respectively, of 100
degrees W. longitude and south of 54 degrees N. latitude), which were
still recovering from the negative population-level effects of
pesticide contamination. We committed to evaluate whether our
management strategy effectively focused take on the northern management
population by collecting feathers from falconer-captured passage
peregrine falcons, and analyzing deuterium levels in those feathers to
estimate the latitude of origin.
Second, because we lacked credible estimates of the size of the
northern passage peregrine falcon population in 2008, we consulted with
the Canadian Wildlife Service and adopted an extremely conservative
estimate of the number (i.e., 3,590) of passage peregrine falcons for
the northern management population. We derived this estimate from the
number of known breeding pairs in the Arctic.
Finally, in our EA and in subsequent Federal Register notices (74
FR 36253, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 56555, September 16, 2010), we committed
to reviewing data on peregrine falcons in the future at the request of
the Flyway Councils to reassess the allowable take limits if data
required or supported a change.
New Information
We have reviewed two recent scientific analyses that provide
important new information relevant to the take of passage peregrine
falcons. First, Franke (2016) used a mark-recapture model to generate
an improved data-based estimate of the average number of passage
peregrine falcons produced in the northern management population
annually. Franke's (2016) data-based estimate of 21,000 is more than
five times greater than the number we used to set take limits in the
2008 EA. Second, the Service and cooperators completed the analysis of
deuterium levels in passage peregrine falcons captured in fall within
the prescribed take area. The deuterium level analysis shows that the
management strategy outlined in the 2008 EA is likely resulting in more
than 75 percent of the falconer take coming from the northern peregrine
falcon management population (Franke et al. 2017). This outcome is more
protective than the objective outlined in the 2008 EA, which was that
at least 65 percent of the passage peregrine falcons taken by falconers
must originate from the northern management population. Overall,
peregrine falcon populations remain healthy across North America, and
indices such as the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) show the continental
population increasing (BBS index for the period 2005-2015 = 6.4 percent
per year, with a 95 percent credible interval of 0.45-13.45 percent)
and no regional populations appear to be declining (Sauer et al. 2017).
The Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyway Councils reviewed
this new information in 2017 and formally requested that we reevaluate
and revise the passage peregrine falcon take limits based on the
updated estimate of the number of passage peregrine falcons produced
annually in the northern management population. Further, the Flyway
Councils requested that we use the 10th quantile (i.e., 18,000) of the
probability distribution for the updated mean annual number of passage
peregrine falcons exposed to take rather than the mean value (i.e.,
21,000). By using the 10th quantile, we expect there to be a 90 percent
chance that the actual number is larger and, therefore, that we remain
protective against overexploitation and account for the uncertainty in
the production estimate. We undertook the analyses requested by the
Flyway Councils by substituting 18,000 (the updated production estimate
for the northern peregrine falcon management population) for 3,590 (the
production estimate used in the 2008 EA) in the same models and using
the same population-specific take rates as specified under the
preferred alternative in the 2008 EA.
The updated analysis indicates that 144 passage peregrine falcons
may be taken annually by falconers east of the 100th meridian between
September 20 and October 20 consistent with the management strategy and
the objectives of the selected alternative in the 2008 EA. In
accordance with these findings, and consistent with the Flyway
Councils' request, this notice announces that the annual take limits
for passage peregrine falcons starting in the fall of 2017 will
increase from 36 to 144, to be divided equally between the Atlantic,
Mississippi, and Central Flyways (i.e., 48 per flyway).
The sole basis for this increase is the updated estimate for the
northern management population. Thus, we consider this increase to be a
technical update to incorporate new and better data. All other
provisions outlined in the 2008 EA remain in effect (e.g., the take
rates and management objectives are unchanged, the take season remains
September 20 to October 20 annually, and the take of passage peregrine
falcons is restricted to areas in the United States east of 100 degrees
W. longitude). Therefore, the environmental impact of authorizing take
of passage peregrine falcons under the preferred alternative will
remain unchanged from that analyzed in the 2008 EA. Because this
assessment addresses only take east of 100 degrees W. longitude, the
general provisions for take of peregrine falcons west of 100 degrees W.
longitude remain as described in our 2010 Federal Register notice (75
FR 56555, September 16, 2010).
We will continue to review peregrine falcon population and take
data for Canada, the United States, and Mexico every 5 years, or at the
request of the Flyway Councils, to reassess the allowable take limits.
We will publish a notice in the Federal Register if we determine that
the take limits for peregrine falcons should be changed again in the
future.
Literature Cited
Franke, A. 2016. Population estimates for Northern juvenile
peregrine falcons with implications for harvest levels in North
America. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 7:36-45.
Franke, A., J. Duxbury, H. Qi, T. Coplen, G.L. Holroyd, and B.A.
Millsap. 2017. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report: hydrogen
stable isotope analysis of peregrine falcons in the United States.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird
Management, Washington, DC.
Sauer, J.R., D.K. Niven, J.E. Hines, D.J. Ziolkowski, K.L. Pardieck,
J.E. Fallon, and W.A. Link. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird
Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2015, Version 2.07.2017. https://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/atlasa15.pl?03560&1&15&csrfmiddlewaretoken=3YKakk7LxT2ki6NSpl4mstudYCqdW02C.
Dated: August 24, 2017.
Gregory J. Sheehan,
Principal Deputy Director,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-19140 Filed 9-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P