Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 41160-41163 [2017-18165]
Download as PDF
41160
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
amount for a loan amount greater than
or equal to $105,158; $3,155 for a loan
amount greater than or equal to $63,095
but less than $105,158; 5 percent of the
total loan amount for loans greater than
or equal to $21,032 but less than
$63,095; $1,052 for a loan amount
greater than or equal to $13,145 but less
than $21,032; or 8 percent of the total
loan amount for loans less than $13,145.
The Bureau is amending comment
43(e)(3)(ii)–1, which lists the
adjustments for each year, to reflect the
new dollar threshold amounts for 2018.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act, notice and opportunity for public
comment are not required if the Bureau
finds that notice and public comment
are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Pursuant to this final rule, in
Regulation Z, comments 32(a)(1)(ii)–1.iv
and –3.iv, 43(e)(3)(ii)–1.iv, and
52(b)(1)(ii)–2.i.E in supplement I are
added to update the exemption
thresholds. The amendments in this
final rule are technical and nondiscretionary, as they merely apply the
method previously established in
Regulation Z for determining
adjustments to the thresholds. For these
reasons, the Bureau has determined that
publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking and providing opportunity
for public comment are unnecessary.
The amendments therefore are adopted
in final form.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not require an
initial or final regulatory flexibility
analysis. 5 U.S.C. 603(a), 604(a).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506;
5 CFR part 1320), the Bureau reviewed
this final rule. No collections of
information pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act are contained in the final
rule.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1026
Advertising, Consumer protection,
Credit, Credit unions, Mortgages,
National banks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Savings
associations, Truth in lending.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Bureau amends
Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 1026, as set
forth below:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:47 Aug 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
PART 1026—TRUTH IN LENDING
(REGULATION Z)
1. The authority citation for part 1026
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 2601, 2603–2605,
2607, 2609, 2617, 3353, 5511, 5512, 5532,
5581; 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
2. In Supplement I to part 1026—
Official Interpretations:
■ a. Under Section 1026.32—
Requirements for High-Cost Mortgages,
under 32(a) Coverage, under Paragraph
32(a)(1)(ii), paragraphs 1.iv and 3.iv are
added.
■ b. Under Section 1026.43—Minimum
Standards for Transactions Secured by
a Dwelling, under 43(e) Qualified
mortgages, under Paragraph 43(e)(3)(ii),
paragraph 1.iv is added.
■ c. Under Section 1026.52—
Limitations on Fees, under 52(b)
Limitations on Penalty Fees, under
52(b)(1)(ii) Safe harbors, paragraph 2.i.E
is added.
The additions read as follows:
■
Supplement I to Part 1026—Official
Interpretations
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—Special Rules Applicable
to Credit Card Accounts and Open-End
Credit Offered to College Students
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1026.52—Limitations on Fees
*
*
*
*
*
52(b) Limitations on Penalty Fees
*
*
*
*
*
52(b)(1)(ii) Safe harbors
*
*
Subpart E—Special Rules for Certain
Home Mortgage Transactions
*
A. For a loan amount greater than or
equal to $105,158: 3 percent of the total
loan amount;
B. For a loan amount greater than or
equal to $63,095 but less than $105,158:
$3,155;
C. For a loan amount greater than or
equal to $21,032 but less than $63,095:
5 percent of the total loan amount;
D. For a loan amount greater than or
equal to $13,145 but less than $21,032:
$1,052;
E. For a loan amount less than
$13,145: 8 percent of the total loan
amount.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1026.32—Requirements for
Certain Closed-End Home Mortgages
32(a) Coverage
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 32(a)(1)(ii).
1. * * *
iv. For 2018, $1,052, reflecting a 2.2
percent increase in the CPI–U from June
2016 to June 2017, rounded to the
nearest whole dollar.
*
*
*
*
*
3. * * *
iv. For 2018, $21,032, reflecting a 2.2
percent increase in the CPI–U from June
2016 to June 2017, rounded to the
nearest whole dollar.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2. * * *
i. * * *
E. Card issuers were permitted to
impose a fee for violating the terms of
an agreement if the fee did not exceed
$27 under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(A) and $38
under § 1026.52(b)(1)(ii)(B), through
December 31, 2017.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 25, 2017.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2017–18003 Filed 8–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Section 1026.43—Minimum Standards
for Transactions Secured by a Dwelling
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0503; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–032–AD; Amendment
39–19009; AD 2017–17–19]
*
RIN 2120–AA64
*
*
*
*
43(e) Qualified mortgages.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 43(e)(3)(ii).
1. * * *
iv. For 2018, reflecting a 2.2 percent
increase in the CPI–U that was reported
on the preceding June 1, a covered
transaction is not a qualified mortgage
unless the transaction’s total points and
fees do not exceed:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model DC–9–81 (MD–
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–
83), and DC–9–87 (MD–87) airplanes,
and Model MD–88 airplanes. This AD
was prompted by reports of cracking of
various structures in the bulkhead. This
AD requires an inspection for cracking
in these structures, and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective October 4,
2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 4, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
It is also available on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0509.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0503; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Garrido, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
phone: 562–627–5232; fax: 562–627–
5210; email: george.garrido@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:47 Aug 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
41161
apply to all The Boeing Company Model
DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82),
DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–87 (MD–
87) airplanes, and Model MD–88
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on June 2, 2017 (82 FR
25547). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of cracking of various structures
in the bulkhead. The NPRM proposed to
require an inspection for cracking in
these structures, and corrective actions
if necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking at the cant
station 1463 bulkhead and cant station
1254 bulkhead, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
that exception to the service
information.
We agree with the commenters’
requests. The cant station 1463
bulkhead is correct for Model MD–88
airplanes. This group revision does not
change the overall scope of the actions
required for Model MD–88 airplanes.
We agree that the service information
exception in paragraph (h)(1) of the
proposed AD is no longer needed. We
have revised the Model MD–88
grouping in paragraph (g) of this AD,
removed paragraph (h)(1) of the
proposed AD, and redesignated
paragraph (h)(2) of the proposed AD as
paragraph (h) in this AD.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Conclusion
Support for the NPRM
Boeing stated that it appreciates the
credit for actions done prior to the
effective date of the AD specified in
paragraph (i) of the proposed AD.
Request To Clarify Location of Crack
Findings
Boeing requested that we revise the
Discussion section to add the vertical
stabilizer location in the sentence ‘‘The
cracks were in the upper left area of the
bulkhead, between longerons L–2 and
L–3, in the frame web, horizontal
stiffeners, lower frame cap, [vertical
stabilizer] rear spar cap, and spar cap
web.’’
We partially agree with Boeing’s
request. The added wording does
accurately indicate the cracking
location. However, this description is
not repeated in this final rule.
Therefore, no change is needed in this
regard.
Requests To Revise Inspection
Locations for Affected Airplanes
Boeing and Delta Airlines (DAL)
requested that we revise paragraph (g) of
the proposed AD to include Model MD–
88 airplanes in the cant station 1463
bulkhead group instead of the cant
station 1254 bulkhead group. The
commenters explained that Model MD–
88 airplanes share the same fuselage
length (and hence, station numbers) as
Model DC–9–81, DC–9–82, and DC–9–
83 airplanes. The commenters also
request that, with the requested change
to paragraph (g) of the proposed AD, we
remove paragraph (h)(1) of the proposed
AD since there would be no need for
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD80–53A316, dated
December 15, 2016. The service
information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection on the left and right
sides of the forward and aft surfaces of
cant station 1463 bulkhead and cant
station 1254 bulkhead for cracking in
the upper caps, upper cap doublers,
bulkhead webs and doublers, stiffeners,
lower caps, and vertical stabilizer rear
spar caps and webs, between longerons
L–11L through L–11R, and corrective
actions. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
361 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
41162
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection ................................
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 .....................................
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:47 Aug 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2017–17–19 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19009; Docket No.
FAA–2017–0503; Product Identifier
2017–NM–032–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective October 4, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–
82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), and DC–9–
87 (MD–87) airplanes, and Model MD–88
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53; Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking of various structures at the cant
station 1463 bulkhead and at the cant station
1254 bulkhead. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking at the cant station
1463 bulkhead and cant station 1254
bulkhead, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Cost per
product
Parts cost
Sfmt 4700
$0
$255
Cost on U.S.
operators
$92,055
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
Within 700 flight cycles or 6 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do a detailed inspection for
cracking on the left and right sides of the
forward and aft surfaces of the cant station
1463 bulkhead (for Model DC–9–81 (MD–81),
DC–9–82 (MD–82), and DC–9–83 (MD–83)
airplanes, and Model MD–88 airplanes) and
cant station 1254 bulkhead (for Model DC–
9–87 (MD–87) airplanes); and do all
applicable corrective actions; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80–53A316,
dated December 15, 2016, except as required
in paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Exception to Service Information
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD80–53A316, dated December 15, 2016,
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action and specifies that action as ‘‘RC’’
(Required for Compliance): Before further
flight, repair the cracking using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Multi
Operator Message MOM–MOM–16–0684–
01B, dated October 7, 2016.
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in
Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), may be issued to operate the
airplane to a location where the requirements
of this AD can be accomplished, but
concurrence by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, FAA, is required before
issuance of the special flight permit.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMLAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
17, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–18165 Filed 8–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. CPSC–2016–0017]
Prohibition of Children’s Toys and
Child Care Articles Containing
Specified Phthalates: Determinations
Regarding Certain Plastics
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (Commission, or CPSC) is
issuing a final rule that determines that
certain plastics with specified additives
(l) Related Information
would not contain the specified
(1) For more information about this AD,
phthalates prohibited in children’s toys
contact George Garrido, Aerospace Engineer,
and child care articles. Based on these
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO
determinations, the specified plastics
Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– with specified additives will not require
third party testing for compliance with
5232; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
george.garrido@faa.gov.
the mandatory prohibitions on
(2) Service information identified in this
children’s toys and child care articles
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
containing phthalates.
available at the addresses specified in
DATES: The rule is effective on
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
September 29, 2017.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
W. Boja, Lead Compliance Officer,
approved the incorporation by reference
Regulatory Enforcement, Office of
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
Compliance and Field Operations,
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
part 51.
4330 East West Highway Bethesda, MD
(2) You must use this service information
20814–4408; telephone: 301–504–7300;
as applicable to do the actions required by
email: jboja@cpsc.gov.
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
53A316, dated December 15, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:47 Aug 29, 2017
Jkt 241001
A. Background
1. Third Party Testing and Burden
Reduction
Section 14(a) of the Consumer
Product Safety Act, (CPSA), as amended
by the Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA),
requires that manufacturers of products
subject to a consumer product safety
rule or similar rule, ban, standard, or
regulation enforced by the CPSC, must
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41163
certify that the product complies with
all applicable CPSC-enforced
requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). For
children’s products, certification must
be based on testing conducted by a
CPSC-accepted third party conformity
assessment body. Id. Public Law 112–28
(August 12, 2011) amended the CPSA
and directed the CPSC to seek comment
on ‘‘opportunities to reduce the cost of
third party testing requirements
consistent with assuring compliance
with any applicable consumer product
safety rule, ban, standard, or
regulation.’’ Public Law 112–28 also
authorized the Commission to issue new
or revised third party testing regulations
if the Commission determines ‘‘that
such regulations will reduce third party
testing costs consistent with assuring
compliance with the applicable
consumer product safety rules, bans,
standards, and regulations.’’ 15 U.S.C.
2063(d)(3)(B).
2. Prohibitions in Section 108 of the
CPSIA
Section 108(a) of the CPSIA
permanently prohibits the manufacture
for sale, offer for sale, distribution in
commerce, or importation into the
United States of any ‘‘children’s toy or
child care article’’ that contains
concentrations of more than 0.1 percent
of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP),
dibutyl phthalate (DBP), or butyl benzyl
phthalate (BBP). 15 U.S.C. 2057c(a).
Section 108(b)(1) prohibits on an
interim basis (i.e., until the Commission
promulgates a final rule), the
manufacture for sale, offer for sale,
distribution in commerce, or
importation into the United States of
‘‘any children’s toy that can be placed
in a child’s mouth’’ or ‘‘child care
article’’ containing concentrations of
more than 0.1 percent of diisononyl
phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate
(DIDP), or di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP).
15 U.S.C. 2057c(b)(1). Children’s toys
and child care articles subject to the
content limits in section 108 of the
CPSIA require third party testing for
compliance with the phthalate content
limits before the manufacturer can issue
a Children’s Product Certificate (CPC)
and enter the children’s toys or child
care articles into commerce.
The CPSIA required the Commission
to appoint a Chronic Hazard Advisory
Panel (CHAP) to ‘‘study the effects on
children’s health of all phthalates and
phthalate alternatives as used in
children’s toys and child care articles.’’
15 U.S.C. 2057c(b)(2). The CHAP issued
E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM
30AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41160-41163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18165]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0503; Product Identifier 2017-NM-032-AD; Amendment
39-19009; AD 2017-17-19]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-
[[Page 41161]]
81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes,
and Model MD-88 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking
of various structures in the bulkhead. This AD requires an inspection
for cracking in these structures, and corrective actions if necessary.
We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective October 4, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 4,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0509.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0503; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Garrido, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5232; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: george.garrido@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87
(MD-87) airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on June 2, 2017 (82 FR 25547). The NPRM was prompted
by reports of cracking of various structures in the bulkhead. The NPRM
proposed to require an inspection for cracking in these structures, and
corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking at the cant station 1463 bulkhead and cant station
1254 bulkhead, which could result in reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing stated that it appreciates the credit for actions done prior
to the effective date of the AD specified in paragraph (i) of the
proposed AD.
Request To Clarify Location of Crack Findings
Boeing requested that we revise the Discussion section to add the
vertical stabilizer location in the sentence ``The cracks were in the
upper left area of the bulkhead, between longerons L-2 and L-3, in the
frame web, horizontal stiffeners, lower frame cap, [vertical
stabilizer] rear spar cap, and spar cap web.''
We partially agree with Boeing's request. The added wording does
accurately indicate the cracking location. However, this description is
not repeated in this final rule. Therefore, no change is needed in this
regard.
Requests To Revise Inspection Locations for Affected Airplanes
Boeing and Delta Airlines (DAL) requested that we revise paragraph
(g) of the proposed AD to include Model MD-88 airplanes in the cant
station 1463 bulkhead group instead of the cant station 1254 bulkhead
group. The commenters explained that Model MD-88 airplanes share the
same fuselage length (and hence, station numbers) as Model DC-9-81, DC-
9-82, and DC-9-83 airplanes. The commenters also request that, with the
requested change to paragraph (g) of the proposed AD, we remove
paragraph (h)(1) of the proposed AD since there would be no need for
that exception to the service information.
We agree with the commenters' requests. The cant station 1463
bulkhead is correct for Model MD-88 airplanes. This group revision does
not change the overall scope of the actions required for Model MD-88
airplanes. We agree that the service information exception in paragraph
(h)(1) of the proposed AD is no longer needed. We have revised the
Model MD-88 grouping in paragraph (g) of this AD, removed paragraph
(h)(1) of the proposed AD, and redesignated paragraph (h)(2) of the
proposed AD as paragraph (h) in this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A316, dated
December 15, 2016. The service information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection on the left and right sides of the forward and aft
surfaces of cant station 1463 bulkhead and cant station 1254 bulkhead
for cracking in the upper caps, upper cap doublers, bulkhead webs and
doublers, stiffeners, lower caps, and vertical stabilizer rear spar
caps and webs, between longerons L-11L through L-11R, and corrective
actions. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 361 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 41162]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection......................... 3 work-hours x $85 per hour $0 $255 $92,055
= $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2017-17-19 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19009; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0503; Product Identifier 2017-NM-032-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective October 4, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81),
DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes, and
Model MD-88 airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53; Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of various
structures at the cant station 1463 bulkhead and at the cant station
1254 bulkhead. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking
at the cant station 1463 bulkhead and cant station 1254 bulkhead,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
Within 700 flight cycles or 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first, do a detailed inspection for
cracking on the left and right sides of the forward and aft surfaces
of the cant station 1463 bulkhead (for Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-
82 (MD-82), and DC-9-83 (MD-83) airplanes, and Model MD-88
airplanes) and cant station 1254 bulkhead (for Model DC-9-87 (MD-87)
airplanes); and do all applicable corrective actions; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD80-53A316, dated December 15, 2016, except as required in
paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight.
(h) Exception to Service Information
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A316, dated December
15, 2016, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance): Before
further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-
MOM-16-0684-01B, dated October 7, 2016.
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), may be issued to operate the airplane to a location
where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, but
concurrence by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, is required
before issuance of the special flight permit.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector,
[[Page 41163]]
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and
(k)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact George Garrido,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5232; fax: 562-627-5210; email: george.garrido@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80-53A316, dated December
15, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-18165 Filed 8-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P