Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 40735-40737 [2017-18164]
Download as PDF
40735
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 165
Monday, August 28, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0806; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–064–AD]
Examining the AD Docket
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 787–8 and 787–
9 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a flight test report
indicating that the crew oxygen masks
in the flight deck did not deploy
correctly. This proposed AD would
require an inspection to determine
whether any crew oxygen mask having
a certain part number is installed at four
locations in the flight deck, and
replacing affected crew oxygen masks.
We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 12, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Aug 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;
Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221. It is also available on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2017–0806.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0806; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA; phone: 425–917–6457; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: susan.l.monroe@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2017–0806; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–064–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM
because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a Model 787–8
flight test report indicating that the crew
oxygen masks in the flight deck did not
deploy correctly. When the crew oxygen
masks were removed from the stowage
boxes, the harnesses were stuck in the
face masks. The harness could get
caught in the oronasal mask or goggles
and increase the time needed to don the
crew oxygen mask. Removing the
harness from the face mask required
using two hands and exceeded the
requirement for the flight crew to don
the oxygen mask in 5 seconds. Model
787–8 and 787–9 airplanes use the same
design for the crew oxygen masks. This
mask removal condition, if not
corrected, could lead to flight crew
hypoxia and the loss of useful
consciousness, possibly resulting in loss
of control of the aircraft.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB350007–00, Issue 001,
dated May 9, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for
replacing the crew oxygen masks at four
locations in the flight deck. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishment of the actions
identified as ‘‘RC’’ (required for
compliance) in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB350007–00, Issue 001,
dated May 9, 2017, described
previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
40736
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0806.
For airplanes with an original
certificate of airworthiness or original
export certificate of airworthiness
issued on or before the effective date of
this AD, this proposed AD requires an
inspection to determine whether any
crew oxygen mask having part number
MLD20–626–1 is installed, and
replacement if necessary.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
The proposed AD applicability differs
from the service information due to
rotability of parts. Because the affected
parts are rotable parts, we have
determined that these parts could later
be installed on airplanes that were
initially delivered with acceptable parts,
thereby subjecting those airplanes to the
unsafe condition. We have coordinated
this difference with Boeing.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 57 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Inspection ..........................
Replacement .....................
Labor cost
1 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $85.
Up to 4 work-hours × $85
per hour = $340.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes to the Director of the
System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Parts cost
17:59 Aug 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
Cost per product
$0 ......................................
$85 ....................................
$4,845
Up to $36,800 ...................
Up to $37,140 ...................
Up to $2,116,980
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2017–0806; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–064–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 12,
2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost on U.S. operators
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 787–8 and 787–9 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a flight test
report indicating that the crew oxygen masks
in the flight deck did not deploy correctly.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the oxygen
mask harness from getting caught in the
oronasal mask or goggles, which may lead to
flight crew hypoxia and the loss of useful
consciousness, possibly resulting in loss of
control of the aircraft.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Oxygen Mask Inspection and
Replacement
For airplanes with an original certificate of
airworthiness or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: Within 72 months
after the effective date of this AD, do an
inspection to determine whether any crew
oxygen mask having part number (P/N)
MLD20–626–1 is installed at the four
locations identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB350007–00, Issue
001, dated May 9, 2017. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection if the part number of the crew
oxygen mask can be conclusively determined
from that review. If any crew oxygen mask
having P/N MLD20–626–1 is found installed,
within 72 months after the effective date of
this AD, do all applicable actions identified
as ‘‘RC’’ in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB350007–00,
Issue 001, dated May 9, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a crew oxygen mask
having P/N MLD20–626–1 on any airplane.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as RC, the provisions
of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone:
425–917–6457; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Aug 25, 2017
Jkt 241001
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
17, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–18164 Filed 8–25–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0665; Airspace
Docket No. 17–ASO–7]
Proposed Amendment of VOR Federal
Airways V–56 and V–209 in the Vicinity
of Kewanee, AL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify VHF Omnidirectional Range
(VOR) Federal airways V–56 and V–209,
in the vicinity of Kewanee, AL. This
action is necessary due to the planned
decommissioning of the Kewanee, AL,
VORTAC navigation aid, which
provides navigation guidance for
segments of the routes. This proposal
would provide for the safe and efficient
use of navigable airspace within the
National Airspace System.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 12, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647–5527 or (202) 366–9826. You
must identify FAA Docket No. FAA–
2017–0665 and Airspace Docket No. 17–
ASO–7 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit
comments through the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. You may review
the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the
Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. The Docket
Office (telephone 1 (800) 647–5527, is
on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.
FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40737
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11A at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace Policy Group, Office
of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
modify the VOR Federal airway route
structure in the eastern United States to
maintain the efficient flow of air traffic.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2017–0665 and Airspace Docket No. 17–
ASO–7) and be submitted in triplicate to
the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40735-40737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18164]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 165 / Monday, August 28, 2017 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 40735]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0806; Product Identifier 2017-NM-064-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by a flight test report indicating that the crew oxygen
masks in the flight deck did not deploy correctly. This proposed AD
would require an inspection to determine whether any crew oxygen mask
having a certain part number is installed at four locations in the
flight deck, and replacing affected crew oxygen masks. We are proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 12,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is
also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0806.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0806; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone:
800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone: 425-917-6457; fax:
425-917-6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0806;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-064-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a Model 787-8 flight test report indicating that
the crew oxygen masks in the flight deck did not deploy correctly. When
the crew oxygen masks were removed from the stowage boxes, the
harnesses were stuck in the face masks. The harness could get caught in
the oronasal mask or goggles and increase the time needed to don the
crew oxygen mask. Removing the harness from the face mask required
using two hands and exceeded the requirement for the flight crew to don
the oxygen mask in 5 seconds. Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes use the
same design for the crew oxygen masks. This mask removal condition, if
not corrected, could lead to flight crew hypoxia and the loss of useful
consciousness, possibly resulting in loss of control of the aircraft.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB350007-00, Issue
001, dated May 9, 2017. The service information describes procedures
for replacing the crew oxygen masks at four locations in the flight
deck. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions
identified as ``RC'' (required for compliance) in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB350007-00, Issue
001, dated May 9, 2017, described previously, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD.
For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
[[Page 40736]]
and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0806.
For airplanes with an original certificate of airworthiness or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD, this proposed AD requires an inspection to
determine whether any crew oxygen mask having part number MLD20-626-1
is installed, and replacement if necessary.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
The proposed AD applicability differs from the service information
due to rotability of parts. Because the affected parts are rotable
parts, we have determined that these parts could later be installed on
airplanes that were initially delivered with acceptable parts, thereby
subjecting those airplanes to the unsafe condition. We have coordinated
this difference with Boeing.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 57 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................... 1 work-hour x $85 $0................ $85............... $4,845
per hour = $85.
Replacement..................... Up to 4 work-hours Up to $36,800..... Up to $37,140..... Up to $2,116,980
x $85 per hour =
$340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2017-0806; Product Identifier
2017-NM-064-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 12, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a flight test report indicating that the
crew oxygen masks in the flight deck did not deploy correctly. We
are issuing this AD to prevent the oxygen mask harness from getting
caught in the oronasal mask or goggles, which may lead to flight
crew hypoxia and the loss of useful consciousness, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aircraft.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Oxygen Mask Inspection and Replacement
For airplanes with an original certificate of airworthiness or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: Within 72 months after the effective date
of this AD, do an inspection to determine whether any crew oxygen
mask having part number (P/N) MLD20-626-1 is installed at the four
locations identified in Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB350007-
00, Issue 001, dated May 9, 2017. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number
of the crew oxygen mask can be conclusively determined from that
review. If any crew oxygen mask having P/N MLD20-626-1 is found
installed, within 72 months after the effective date of this AD, do
all applicable actions identified as ``RC'' in, and in accordance
with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB350007-00, Issue 001, dated May 9, 2017.
[[Page 40737]]
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
crew oxygen mask having P/N MLD20-626-1 on any airplane.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as RC, the provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this
AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Susan L. Monroe,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone:
425-917-6457; fax: 425-917-6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 17, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-18164 Filed 8-25-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P