Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District; Utah; West Fork Smiths Fork Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Enhancement, 40543-40546 [2017-18016]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
LaFond, Agricultural Marketing Service,
Fruits and Vegetables Division, Mail
Stop 0235, Room 2086, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. Telephone:
(202) 690–4944, Fax: (202) 720–0016,
Email: dorian.lafond@usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE
PUBLIC MEETING CONTACT: Kenneth
Lowery, U.S. Codex Office, 1400
Independence Avenue, Room 4861,
Washington, DC 20250. Telephone:
(202) 690–4042, Fax: (202) 720–3157,
Email: Kenneth.Lowery@fsis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Codex was established in 1963 by two
United Nations organizations, the Food
and Agriculture Organization and the
World Health Organization. Through
adoption of food standards, codes of
practice, and other guidelines
developed by its committees, and by
promoting their adoption and
implementation by governments, Codex
seeks to protect the health of consumers
and ensure fair practices in the food
trade.
The CCFFV is responsible for
elaborating worldwide standards and
codes of practice as may be appropriate
for fresh fruits and vegetables and for
consulting with other international
organizations in the standards
development process to avoid
duplication.
The Committee is hosted by Mexico.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Issues To Be Discussed at the Public
Meeting
The following items on the Agenda
for the 20th Session of the CCFFV will
be discussed during the public meeting:
• Matters arising from Codex and
other Committees;
• Matters arising from other
international organizations on the
standardization of fresh fruits and
vegetables
• Draft Standard for Aubergines;
• Draft Standard for Garlic;
• Draft Standard for Kiwifruit;
• Draft Standard for Ware Potatoes;
• Proposed Draft Standard for Fresh
Date;
• Proposals for new work on Codex
standards for fresh fruits and vegetables;
• Proposed layout for Codex
standards for fresh fruits and vegetables
(Outstanding issues); and
• Discussion paper on Glossary of
terms used in the Layout for Codex
standards for fresh fruits and vegetables.
Each issue listed will be fully
described in documents distributed, or
to be distributed, by the Secretariat
before to the Meeting. Members of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
public may access or request copies of
these documents (see ADDRESSES).
Public Meeting
At the September 1, 2017, public
meeting, draft U.S. positions on the
agenda items will be described and
discussed, and attendees will have the
opportunity to pose questions and offer
comments. Written comments may be
offered at the meeting or sent to the U.S.
Delegate for the 20th Session of the
CCFFV, Dorian LaFond (see ADDRESSES).
Written comments should state that they
relate to activities of the 20th Session of
CCFFV.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, FSIS will
announce this Federal Register
publication on-line through the FSIS
Web page located at: https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register.
FSIS also will make copies of this
publication available through the FSIS
Constituent Update, which is used to
provide information regarding FSIS
policies, procedures, regulations,
Federal Register notices, FSIS public
meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest
to our constituents and stakeholders.
The Update is available on the FSIS
Web page. Through the Web page, FSIS
is able to provide information to a much
broader, more diverse audience. In
addition, FSIS offers an email
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at:
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe.
Options range from recalls to export
information, regulations, directives, and
notices. Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
USDA Non-Discrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the
USDA shall, on the grounds of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity, sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, or political
beliefs, exclude from participation in,
deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United
States under any program or activity
conducted by the USDA.
How To File a Complaint of
Discrimination
To file a complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40543
Discrimination Complaint Form, which
may be accessed online at https://
www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_
12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you
or your authorized representative.
Send your completed complaint form
or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410. Fax: (202)
690–7442. Email: program.intake@
usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.),
should contact USDA’s TARGET Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
Done at Washington, DC on August 22,
2017.
Mary Frances Lowe,
U.S. Manager for Codex Alimentarius.
[FR Doc. 2017–18082 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest,
Evanston-Mountain View Ranger
District; Utah; West Fork Smiths Fork
Colorado River Cutthroat Trout
Enhancement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Evanston-Mountain View
Ranger District of the Uinta-WasatchCache National Forest (‘‘Forest
Service’’), in cooperation with the Utah
Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR),
proposes to treat the streams in the West
Fork Smiths Fork drainage including
some waters within the High Uintas
Wilderness and High Uintas Inventoried
Roadless Area with rotenone to remove
non-native fish species and enhance
habitat for native Colorado River
cutthroat trout (CRCT; Onchorhynchus
clarki pleuriticus).
Implementation of this proposal
would require the use of a piscicide (a
substance used to kill fish; i.e.,
rotenone) to remove competing and
hybridizing non-native fish species from
selected streams. Non-native fish
species to be removed are primarily
rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
and hybridized Colorado River cutthroat
trout, although all fish species would be
removed from the project area.
Following the last treatment of the
selected streams, CRCT, sculpin (Cottus
sp.), mountain sucker (Catostomus
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
40544
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
platyrhynchus), and speckled dace
(Rhinichthys osculus) (all native to the
drainage) would be restocked. Tiger
trout (Salmo trutta x Salvelinus
fontinalis) are a sterile hybrid that may
be stocked in the project area to provide
fishing opportunities while the CRCT
population is expanding.
The waters proposed for treatments
include selected streams that are the
headwaters of the West Fork Smiths
Fork drainage, on the north slope of the
Uinta Mountains. Implementation
would potentially begin during the
summer or fall of 2018. Treatments of
all identified target waters is expected to
take place over the course of two to
three years. Monitoring will occur after
the treatments to ensure all fish are
removed throughout the project area.
Once the treatment is completed and
CRCT, sculpin, mountain sucker,
speckled dace and tiger trout are
stocked back in the drainage,
populations will be monitored every
five to ten years to ensure the native
populations are well established.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
September 25, 2017. The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
is expected January 2018 and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected July 2018. Those who wish to
establish standing to object under 36
CFR part 218 subparts A and B should
submit scoping comments no later than
30 days after publication of this notice
of intent or during the comment period
for the DEIS.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning the scope of the analysis,
including any attachments, must be sent
via regular mail, hand-delivered or
express delivered to: Logan Ranger
District, Attn: West Fork Smiths Fork
CRCT Enhancement, 1500 E Highway
89, Logan, UT 84321. The office
business hours for submitting handdelivered comments are 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding federal holidays. Electronic
comments must be submitted in a
format such as an email message or
attached to an email in a format such as,
.pdf, .txt, .rtf, .doc, or .docx to:
comments-intermtn-wasatch-cacheevanston-mtnview@fs.fed.us. Comments
may also be faxed to 435–755–3639.
Public scoping meetings are not being
considered at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Chase, Fisheries Biologist, at 435–755–
3629 or pchase@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is being conducted pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
and Forest Service NEPA regulations.
This project is subject to pre-decisional
administrative review pursuant to 36
CFR part 218, subparts A and B. Also
called the ‘‘objection process’’ the predecisional administrative review
process replaced the appeal process in
March 2013. Only persons or
organizations who have previously
submitted ‘‘specific written comments’’
regarding the proposed project during
any designated opportunity for public
comment are eligible to file an
objection. Opportunity for public
comment on a DEIS includes request for
comments during scoping, the 40 CFR
1506.10 comment period, or other
public involvement opportunity where
written comments are requested by the
responsible official (36 CFR 218.5). An
objection period for the draft Record of
Decision and Final Environmental
Impact Statement will be provided,
consistent with those subparts.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the project is to permit
the UDWR, having jurisdiction by law,
to manage, protect, maintain, enhance,
rehabilitate, and extend the fish and
wildlife populations of the State of
Utah, to conduct activities in order to
protect known populations of
indigenous species (i.e., CRCT) that
could become threatened or endangered
where necessary for their perpetuation
and to aid in their recovery in
previously occupied habitat. The Forest
Service purpose and need is centric to
responding to UDWR’s proposal to use
piscicide in wilderness as necessary to
conduct fish removal prior to restocking
with CRCT.
The purpose of this project is to
establish Colorado River cutthroat trout
(CRCT) populations free of competing
and hybridizing fish species (rainbow
trout) in streams in the West Fork
Smiths Fork drainage on the EvanstonMountain View Ranger District of the
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest.
Removal of competing and hybridizing
non-native fish is necessary to enhance
habitat and restore genetically pure
native CRCT populations to suitable
habitats within the West Fork Smiths
Fork drainage. Therefore, the primary
objective is to remove rainbow and
hybridized cutthroat trout that occur
within these waters.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The upper reaches of the West Fork
Smiths Fork drainage is within the High
Uintas Wilderness and considered by
state and Forest Service fisheries
biologists to be critical and essential
habitat in the watershed. Moreover, a
wilderness is to be ‘‘protected and
managed so as to preserve its natural
conditions’’ meaning that wilderness
ecological systems are substantially free
from the effects of modern civilization.
To preserve this quality, it is necessary
to take action to correct unnatural
conditions and address the scenic and
conservation public purposes of
wilderness, even if they were present at
the time of wilderness designation. Any
impacts resulting from the influence of
modern civilization (such as the effects
on indigenous CRCT from historic
stocking of non-native rainbow trout)
affect the natural quality of wilderness
character.
In order to preserve the natural
conditions within the wilderness and
conserve the native CRCT and repopulate West Fork Smiths Fork with
native CRCT the presence of the nonnative hybridized CRCT and rainbow
trout must be addressed in upper
reaches of the West Fork Smiths Fork
drainage. Limiting the project to the
stream segments outside wilderness is
not sufficient due to stream
connectivity; the existing rainbow and
hybridized CRCT within wilderness
would continue downstream
progression in the absence of a
migration barrier.
This action is being considered at this
time because these non-native fish
species continue to threaten CRCT
populations through competition and
hybridization. This action is important
to meet the objective identified in the
CRCT Conservation Strategy to ‘‘secure
or enhance CRCT populations’’ by
removing non-native fish species. Once
hybridization and repeated backcrossing
of CRCT populations has begun, options
for restoring a genetically pure stock are
few. If mating between CRCT and
rainbow trout or nonnative cutthroat
continues for a number of generations
and if hybrids do not show reduced
fitness, then the genes of non-native
stocks will pervade virtually all
remaining individuals to produce a
hybrid swarm within a particular area.
Removal of hybrids often fails for two
reasons: First, whereas it is often
possible to recognize first-generation
hybrids between rainbow trout and
cutthroat trout visually, backcrosses and
later-generation individuals can be
indistinguishable from genetically pure
adults without the aid of genetic testing;
second, if introgressive hybridization
has progressed through several
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
generations, nearly all individuals will
carry at least some introduced genes,
and reducing this influence to
undetectable levels is probably futile.
Establishing populations of
indigenous CRCT free from the threats
from non-native trout would greatly
benefit CRCT recovery efforts within the
species historic range, which includes
portions of Utah, Wyoming, and
Colorado. The project would contribute
to the conservation of the species and
reduce the potential need for federal
protection under the Endangered
Species Act.
This action is tiered to the 2003
Revised Land and Resource
Management Plan [for the] UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest, as
amended through the September 2015
Plan, and helps move the project area
towards desired conditions described in
that plan. The UDWR and Forest Service
want to ensure the persistence of the
CRCT within its historic range. This
includes preserving genetic integrity
and providing adequate populations to
maintain intrinsic and recreational
values. This proposed project would not
require a Forest Plan amendment.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to permit
the UDWR, being the agency responsible
for the management of fish populations,
to treat target waters with piscicide
(rotenone) to remove competing and
hybridizing non-native trout species
within the proposed project area. Target
streams are located within the West
Fork Smiths Fork drainage including
some areas within the High Uintas
Wilderness. The waters proposed for
treatments includes approximately 12
stream miles (approximately 4 miles
outside of wilderness and 8 miles
within wilderness) on the north slope of
the Uinta Mountains. Implementation
would potentially begin during the
summer or fall of 2018. Treatments of
all identified target waters is expected to
take place over the course of 2 to 3
years.
The following is a summary of the
proposed suite of activities for the West
Fork Smiths Fork Colorado River
Cutthroat Trout Enhancement project.
The UDWR would take the lead in
implementing the treatment project
within target waters of the proposed
project areas. The Forest Service would
assist as the agency responsible for
management of fish habitat.
Transporting Crew Members,
Equipment, and Supplies. Crew
members, equipment, and supplies will
be brought into the High Uintas
Wilderness by foot and pack stock using
designated trails; mechanical transport
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
will not be used. Implementation of the
proposed treatment project would
require small crews to camp near the
target waters. Crew members would set
up base camp(s) in the wilderness to
stay overnight. The actual dispensing of
rotenone, which would require the most
man-power (approximately 8–10
people), would occur over a short one
to two day period in the late summer or
fall of each year. On those days, crew
members would disperse along the
stream corridors and would be spread
out at approximately one-half mile
intervals along streams targeted for
piscicide application; crew members
would return to camp after the
application has concluded for the day.
On the final day crew members,
equipment, and supplies would be
hiked out and/or removed with pack
stock using designated trails.
The neutralization stage (one to two
week period) which would occur
outside the wilderness, would require
that crew members set up a base camp
at the Hewinta Guard Station.
Piscicide Application (‘‘Treatment’’)
and Neutralization. The proposed
project would be implemented during a
two week period in July through
September of each year. Rotenone liquid
would be applied up to a concentration
of 1.0 parts per million of product
however the minimum concentration
needed to remove target species would
be used. All target waters to be treated
that year would be treated with
rotenone during a one to two-day
period. Streams would be treated a
minimum of two times. This would
likely be completed in consecutive years
but could be within the same year. If
two treatments occur within the same
year, a one to two months resting period
would occur between treatments.
Liquid emulsifiable rotenone would
be used to treat the flowing water
sections following procedures outlined
in the Rotenone Standard Operating
Procedures Manual (SOP). Rotenone
would be applied from drip stations
located at approximately 0.5–1.0 mile
intervals for a 6-hour period.
Pressurized backpack sprayers would
also be used to apply rotenone to
springs and backwater areas; motorized
transport would not be used during this
process. A small amount of rotenone
may be used to treat small side
tributaries or standing water. Sentinel
fish would be placed in live cages at
strategic locations along the stream to
monitor the effectiveness of the
treatment.
Procedures outlined in the Rotenone
SOP would be followed for neutralizing
rotenone-treated waters. Potassium
permanganate would be dispensed at or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40545
near the fish migration barrier at the
downstream end of the project area
(outside of the wilderness). Potassium
permanganate would be dispensed to
neutralize rotenone and prevent
mortality of non-target organisms
beyond target treatment areas.
Powdered potassium permanganate
would be used as a neutralizing agent
for the rotenone. The application rate of
potassium permanganate would be
determined after the pre-treatment
factors of water temperature and
hardness are measured. The
neutralization zone for the project
would be approximately the 30-minute
travel distance downstream from the
location potassium permanganate is
dispensed into the stream.
Neutralization of rotenone would take
an estimated one to two weeks,
dependent on temperature and other
factors. Continuous use of the auger and
gas powered generator would be
necessary to effectively dispense
potassium permanganate during this
one to two week period (occurs outside
of wilderness).
Fish Recovery. Dead fish would be
washed downstream, consumed by
scavenging wildlife or provide needed
nutrients for repopulating aquatic
macroinvertebrates; dead fish would not
be collected.
Public Access and Area Closures.
Public access into the High Uintas
Wilderness would remain open to the
public during the treatment, however
closures (1–2 days) for public access to
the target stream(s) during the treatment
would occur. UDWR would post signs
warning of the upcoming treatment
prior to starting and actual closure signs
would be posted along the trail(s)
during the treatment. These temporary
signs would be removed at the
conclusion of each treatment. Public
access would be allowed during the
neutralization phase.
Fish Stocking. UDWR would be the
entity responsible for reintroducing/
stocking fish species; fish would be
released throughout the drainage.
Buckets required to carry fish for
restocking would be transported by
small crews using designated trails and
disperse along the stream corridors.
Trucks would transport fish to the
project area; no aircraft or mechanical
transport would be used in wilderness.
Fish reintroduction/stocking would
occur a few weeks after the last
treatment (year two). Treated waters
would be restocked with CRCT, sculpin,
mountain sucker, speckled dace, and
tiger trout. Tiger trout are a sterile
hybrid that would be stocked in the
project area to provide fishing
opportunities while the CRCT
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
40546
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices
population is expanding following the
last treatment of the selected water.
Once CRCT are well established, tiger
trout will no longer be stocked and will
disappear from the system over 4–5
years.
Monitoring. Monitoring will occur
after both the first and second
treatments to ensure all fish are
removed throughout the proposed
project area. Once the treatment is
completed and CRCT, sculpin,
mountain sucker, speckled dace and
tiger trout are stocked back in the
drainage, populations will be monitored
every 5–10 years to ensure the native
populations are well established.
Possible Alternatives
At this time, there are two alternatives
that are being considered: Alternative 1
(No Action) and Alternative 2 (Proposed
Action). Alternative 1 would not
authorize the application of piscicide in
the wilderness and associated suite of
activities. Alternative 2 is described
above. During the course of
development of the Environmental
Impact Statement it is possible that the
public, Forest Service staff, or both will
identify additional alternatives to be
evaluated.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Evanston-Mountain View Ranger
District of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache
National Forest will be the lead agency
preparing the Environmental Impact
Statement. The Utah Division of
Wildlife Resources will be a cooperating
agency.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Responsible Official
Unless specified otherwise, the
Regional Forester is responsible for
approving all measures that implement
Forest Service Manual direction on the
use of other resources in wilderness.
Specific responsibilities include
approving the use of pesticides within
wilderness.
The responsible official for this
project is the Regional Forester for the
Intermountain Region (R4).
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made includes
whether or not to approve the proposed
suite of activities, in whole or in part,
specifically: (1) Application of piscicide
(‘‘treatment’’) within designated
wilderness on National Forest System
(NFS) land and neutralization outside of
designated wilderness on NFS land; (2)
seasonal and multi-year timing of the
action; (3) method of transport for
materials, equipment, and personnel to
treatment areas; (4) closing public
access to the stream during the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
treatment; (5) restocking with CRCT,
sculpin, mountain sucker, speckled
dace, and tiger trout; (6) monitoring
following treatment and neutralization;
and, (7) what mitigation measures will
be implemented. Because the majority
of streams occur within wilderness,
methodologies and activities selected
for implementation must conform to
special land use restrictions as much as
possible.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues that have been
identified include potential impacts to
fisheries and aquatic resources, health
and human safety, wilderness and other
undeveloped lands, wildlife (terrestrial),
soil and water resources, wilderness,
and wildlife. Additional issues may
arise based on comments received from
the public during the scoping and
comment processes.
Permits or Licenses Required
The Utah Division of Wildlife
Resources would submit a Pesticide Use
Proposal as well as a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System to the
Regional Forester for approval. These
permits are required to allow
application of the piscicide to targeted
waters within wilderness.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the Environmental
Impact Statement. In addition to and
concurrent with publication of this
notice of intent, a public scoping
document was published to the projectspecific information page on the UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest Web site
at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=51924, and a postcard was sent
to individuals, entities, and
organizations informing them that the
notice of intent and public scoping
document had been published.
Comments may be submitted in a
variety of ways, specifically: Via regular
mail, hand-delivered or express
delivered, via fax, and via email.
Comments sought include specific
comments to the proposed action,
appropriate information that could be
pertinent to analysis of environmental
consequences, identification of
significant issues, and identification of
potential alternatives.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
Environmental Impact Statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
scoping period and should clearly
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: August 1, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National
Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017–18016 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Northern New Mexico Resource
Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Northern New Mexico
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
will meet in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The
committee is authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with the Act.
RAC information can be found at the
following Web site: https://
www.fs.usda.gov/main/santafe/
workingtogether/advisorycommittees.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
September 12–13, 2017, from 9:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m.
All RAC meetings are subject to
cancellation. For status of meeting prior
to attendance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held at
the Santa Fe National Forest (NF)
Supervisor’s Office, 11 Forest Lane,
Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at the Santa Fe NF
Supervisor’s Office. Please call ahead to
facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reuben Montes, RAC Coordinator, by
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40543-40546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Evanston-Mountain View
Ranger District; Utah; West Fork Smiths Fork Colorado River Cutthroat
Trout Enhancement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District of the Uinta-
Wasatch-Cache National Forest (``Forest Service''), in cooperation with
the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR), proposes to treat the
streams in the West Fork Smiths Fork drainage including some waters
within the High Uintas Wilderness and High Uintas Inventoried Roadless
Area with rotenone to remove non-native fish species and enhance
habitat for native Colorado River cutthroat trout (CRCT; Onchorhynchus
clarki pleuriticus).
Implementation of this proposal would require the use of a
piscicide (a substance used to kill fish; i.e., rotenone) to remove
competing and hybridizing non-native fish species from selected
streams. Non-native fish species to be removed are primarily rainbow
trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and hybridized Colorado River cutthroat
trout, although all fish species would be removed from the project
area. Following the last treatment of the selected streams, CRCT,
sculpin (Cottus sp.), mountain sucker (Catostomus
[[Page 40544]]
platyrhynchus), and speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) (all native to
the drainage) would be restocked. Tiger trout (Salmo trutta x
Salvelinus fontinalis) are a sterile hybrid that may be stocked in the
project area to provide fishing opportunities while the CRCT population
is expanding.
The waters proposed for treatments include selected streams that
are the headwaters of the West Fork Smiths Fork drainage, on the north
slope of the Uinta Mountains. Implementation would potentially begin
during the summer or fall of 2018. Treatments of all identified target
waters is expected to take place over the course of two to three years.
Monitoring will occur after the treatments to ensure all fish are
removed throughout the project area. Once the treatment is completed
and CRCT, sculpin, mountain sucker, speckled dace and tiger trout are
stocked back in the drainage, populations will be monitored every five
to ten years to ensure the native populations are well established.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by September 25, 2017. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
is expected January 2018 and the Final Environmental Impact Statement
is expected July 2018. Those who wish to establish standing to object
under 36 CFR part 218 subparts A and B should submit scoping comments
no later than 30 days after publication of this notice of intent or
during the comment period for the DEIS.
ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning the scope of the analysis,
including any attachments, must be sent via regular mail, hand-
delivered or express delivered to: Logan Ranger District, Attn: West
Fork Smiths Fork CRCT Enhancement, 1500 E Highway 89, Logan, UT 84321.
The office business hours for submitting hand-delivered comments are
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding federal
holidays. Electronic comments must be submitted in a format such as an
email message or attached to an email in a format such as, .pdf, .txt,
.rtf, .doc, or .docx to: comments-intermtn-wasatch-cache-evanston-mtnview@fs.fed.us. Comments may also be faxed to 435-755-3639. Public
scoping meetings are not being considered at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Chase, Fisheries Biologist, at
435-755-3629 or pchase@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is being conducted pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500-1508), and Forest Service NEPA regulations. This project is
subject to pre-decisional administrative review pursuant to 36 CFR part
218, subparts A and B. Also called the ``objection process'' the pre-
decisional administrative review process replaced the appeal process in
March 2013. Only persons or organizations who have previously submitted
``specific written comments'' regarding the proposed project during any
designated opportunity for public comment are eligible to file an
objection. Opportunity for public comment on a DEIS includes request
for comments during scoping, the 40 CFR 1506.10 comment period, or
other public involvement opportunity where written comments are
requested by the responsible official (36 CFR 218.5). An objection
period for the draft Record of Decision and Final Environmental Impact
Statement will be provided, consistent with those subparts.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the project is to permit the UDWR, having
jurisdiction by law, to manage, protect, maintain, enhance,
rehabilitate, and extend the fish and wildlife populations of the State
of Utah, to conduct activities in order to protect known populations of
indigenous species (i.e., CRCT) that could become threatened or
endangered where necessary for their perpetuation and to aid in their
recovery in previously occupied habitat. The Forest Service purpose and
need is centric to responding to UDWR's proposal to use piscicide in
wilderness as necessary to conduct fish removal prior to restocking
with CRCT.
The purpose of this project is to establish Colorado River
cutthroat trout (CRCT) populations free of competing and hybridizing
fish species (rainbow trout) in streams in the West Fork Smiths Fork
drainage on the Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District of the Uinta-
Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Removal of competing and hybridizing
non-native fish is necessary to enhance habitat and restore genetically
pure native CRCT populations to suitable habitats within the West Fork
Smiths Fork drainage. Therefore, the primary objective is to remove
rainbow and hybridized cutthroat trout that occur within these waters.
The upper reaches of the West Fork Smiths Fork drainage is within
the High Uintas Wilderness and considered by state and Forest Service
fisheries biologists to be critical and essential habitat in the
watershed. Moreover, a wilderness is to be ``protected and managed so
as to preserve its natural conditions'' meaning that wilderness
ecological systems are substantially free from the effects of modern
civilization. To preserve this quality, it is necessary to take action
to correct unnatural conditions and address the scenic and conservation
public purposes of wilderness, even if they were present at the time of
wilderness designation. Any impacts resulting from the influence of
modern civilization (such as the effects on indigenous CRCT from
historic stocking of non-native rainbow trout) affect the natural
quality of wilderness character.
In order to preserve the natural conditions within the wilderness
and conserve the native CRCT and re-populate West Fork Smiths Fork with
native CRCT the presence of the non-native hybridized CRCT and rainbow
trout must be addressed in upper reaches of the West Fork Smiths Fork
drainage. Limiting the project to the stream segments outside
wilderness is not sufficient due to stream connectivity; the existing
rainbow and hybridized CRCT within wilderness would continue downstream
progression in the absence of a migration barrier.
This action is being considered at this time because these non-
native fish species continue to threaten CRCT populations through
competition and hybridization. This action is important to meet the
objective identified in the CRCT Conservation Strategy to ``secure or
enhance CRCT populations'' by removing non-native fish species. Once
hybridization and repeated backcrossing of CRCT populations has begun,
options for restoring a genetically pure stock are few. If mating
between CRCT and rainbow trout or nonnative cutthroat continues for a
number of generations and if hybrids do not show reduced fitness, then
the genes of non-native stocks will pervade virtually all remaining
individuals to produce a hybrid swarm within a particular area.
Removal of hybrids often fails for two reasons: First, whereas it
is often possible to recognize first-generation hybrids between rainbow
trout and cutthroat trout visually, backcrosses and later-generation
individuals can be indistinguishable from genetically pure adults
without the aid of genetic testing; second, if introgressive
hybridization has progressed through several
[[Page 40545]]
generations, nearly all individuals will carry at least some introduced
genes, and reducing this influence to undetectable levels is probably
futile.
Establishing populations of indigenous CRCT free from the threats
from non-native trout would greatly benefit CRCT recovery efforts
within the species historic range, which includes portions of Utah,
Wyoming, and Colorado. The project would contribute to the conservation
of the species and reduce the potential need for federal protection
under the Endangered Species Act.
This action is tiered to the 2003 Revised Land and Resource
Management Plan [for the] Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, as
amended through the September 2015 Plan, and helps move the project
area towards desired conditions described in that plan. The UDWR and
Forest Service want to ensure the persistence of the CRCT within its
historic range. This includes preserving genetic integrity and
providing adequate populations to maintain intrinsic and recreational
values. This proposed project would not require a Forest Plan
amendment.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to permit the UDWR, being the agency
responsible for the management of fish populations, to treat target
waters with piscicide (rotenone) to remove competing and hybridizing
non-native trout species within the proposed project area. Target
streams are located within the West Fork Smiths Fork drainage including
some areas within the High Uintas Wilderness. The waters proposed for
treatments includes approximately 12 stream miles (approximately 4
miles outside of wilderness and 8 miles within wilderness) on the north
slope of the Uinta Mountains. Implementation would potentially begin
during the summer or fall of 2018. Treatments of all identified target
waters is expected to take place over the course of 2 to 3 years.
The following is a summary of the proposed suite of activities for
the West Fork Smiths Fork Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Enhancement
project. The UDWR would take the lead in implementing the treatment
project within target waters of the proposed project areas. The Forest
Service would assist as the agency responsible for management of fish
habitat.
Transporting Crew Members, Equipment, and Supplies. Crew members,
equipment, and supplies will be brought into the High Uintas Wilderness
by foot and pack stock using designated trails; mechanical transport
will not be used. Implementation of the proposed treatment project
would require small crews to camp near the target waters. Crew members
would set up base camp(s) in the wilderness to stay overnight. The
actual dispensing of rotenone, which would require the most man-power
(approximately 8-10 people), would occur over a short one to two day
period in the late summer or fall of each year. On those days, crew
members would disperse along the stream corridors and would be spread
out at approximately one-half mile intervals along streams targeted for
piscicide application; crew members would return to camp after the
application has concluded for the day. On the final day crew members,
equipment, and supplies would be hiked out and/or removed with pack
stock using designated trails.
The neutralization stage (one to two week period) which would occur
outside the wilderness, would require that crew members set up a base
camp at the Hewinta Guard Station.
Piscicide Application (``Treatment'') and Neutralization. The
proposed project would be implemented during a two week period in July
through September of each year. Rotenone liquid would be applied up to
a concentration of 1.0 parts per million of product however the minimum
concentration needed to remove target species would be used. All target
waters to be treated that year would be treated with rotenone during a
one to two-day period. Streams would be treated a minimum of two times.
This would likely be completed in consecutive years but could be within
the same year. If two treatments occur within the same year, a one to
two months resting period would occur between treatments.
Liquid emulsifiable rotenone would be used to treat the flowing
water sections following procedures outlined in the Rotenone Standard
Operating Procedures Manual (SOP). Rotenone would be applied from drip
stations located at approximately 0.5-1.0 mile intervals for a 6-hour
period. Pressurized backpack sprayers would also be used to apply
rotenone to springs and backwater areas; motorized transport would not
be used during this process. A small amount of rotenone may be used to
treat small side tributaries or standing water. Sentinel fish would be
placed in live cages at strategic locations along the stream to monitor
the effectiveness of the treatment.
Procedures outlined in the Rotenone SOP would be followed for
neutralizing rotenone-treated waters. Potassium permanganate would be
dispensed at or near the fish migration barrier at the downstream end
of the project area (outside of the wilderness). Potassium permanganate
would be dispensed to neutralize rotenone and prevent mortality of non-
target organisms beyond target treatment areas.
Powdered potassium permanganate would be used as a neutralizing
agent for the rotenone. The application rate of potassium permanganate
would be determined after the pre-treatment factors of water
temperature and hardness are measured. The neutralization zone for the
project would be approximately the 30-minute travel distance downstream
from the location potassium permanganate is dispensed into the stream.
Neutralization of rotenone would take an estimated one to two weeks,
dependent on temperature and other factors. Continuous use of the auger
and gas powered generator would be necessary to effectively dispense
potassium permanganate during this one to two week period (occurs
outside of wilderness).
Fish Recovery. Dead fish would be washed downstream, consumed by
scavenging wildlife or provide needed nutrients for repopulating
aquatic macroinvertebrates; dead fish would not be collected.
Public Access and Area Closures. Public access into the High Uintas
Wilderness would remain open to the public during the treatment,
however closures (1-2 days) for public access to the target stream(s)
during the treatment would occur. UDWR would post signs warning of the
upcoming treatment prior to starting and actual closure signs would be
posted along the trail(s) during the treatment. These temporary signs
would be removed at the conclusion of each treatment. Public access
would be allowed during the neutralization phase.
Fish Stocking. UDWR would be the entity responsible for
reintroducing/stocking fish species; fish would be released throughout
the drainage. Buckets required to carry fish for restocking would be
transported by small crews using designated trails and disperse along
the stream corridors. Trucks would transport fish to the project area;
no aircraft or mechanical transport would be used in wilderness. Fish
reintroduction/stocking would occur a few weeks after the last
treatment (year two). Treated waters would be restocked with CRCT,
sculpin, mountain sucker, speckled dace, and tiger trout. Tiger trout
are a sterile hybrid that would be stocked in the project area to
provide fishing opportunities while the CRCT
[[Page 40546]]
population is expanding following the last treatment of the selected
water. Once CRCT are well established, tiger trout will no longer be
stocked and will disappear from the system over 4-5 years.
Monitoring. Monitoring will occur after both the first and second
treatments to ensure all fish are removed throughout the proposed
project area. Once the treatment is completed and CRCT, sculpin,
mountain sucker, speckled dace and tiger trout are stocked back in the
drainage, populations will be monitored every 5-10 years to ensure the
native populations are well established.
Possible Alternatives
At this time, there are two alternatives that are being considered:
Alternative 1 (No Action) and Alternative 2 (Proposed Action).
Alternative 1 would not authorize the application of piscicide in the
wilderness and associated suite of activities. Alternative 2 is
described above. During the course of development of the Environmental
Impact Statement it is possible that the public, Forest Service staff,
or both will identify additional alternatives to be evaluated.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District of the Uinta-Wasatch-
Cache National Forest will be the lead agency preparing the
Environmental Impact Statement. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
will be a cooperating agency.
Responsible Official
Unless specified otherwise, the Regional Forester is responsible
for approving all measures that implement Forest Service Manual
direction on the use of other resources in wilderness. Specific
responsibilities include approving the use of pesticides within
wilderness.
The responsible official for this project is the Regional Forester
for the Intermountain Region (R4).
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made includes whether or not to approve the
proposed suite of activities, in whole or in part, specifically: (1)
Application of piscicide (``treatment'') within designated wilderness
on National Forest System (NFS) land and neutralization outside of
designated wilderness on NFS land; (2) seasonal and multi-year timing
of the action; (3) method of transport for materials, equipment, and
personnel to treatment areas; (4) closing public access to the stream
during the treatment; (5) restocking with CRCT, sculpin, mountain
sucker, speckled dace, and tiger trout; (6) monitoring following
treatment and neutralization; and, (7) what mitigation measures will be
implemented. Because the majority of streams occur within wilderness,
methodologies and activities selected for implementation must conform
to special land use restrictions as much as possible.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues that have been identified include potential
impacts to fisheries and aquatic resources, health and human safety,
wilderness and other undeveloped lands, wildlife (terrestrial), soil
and water resources, wilderness, and wildlife. Additional issues may
arise based on comments received from the public during the scoping and
comment processes.
Permits or Licenses Required
The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources would submit a Pesticide
Use Proposal as well as a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System to the Regional Forester for approval. These permits are
required to allow application of the piscicide to targeted waters
within wilderness.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the Environmental Impact Statement. In addition to
and concurrent with publication of this notice of intent, a public
scoping document was published to the project-specific information page
on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Web site at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=51924, and a postcard was sent to
individuals, entities, and organizations informing them that the notice
of intent and public scoping document had been published. Comments may
be submitted in a variety of ways, specifically: Via regular mail,
hand-delivered or express delivered, via fax, and via email. Comments
sought include specific comments to the proposed action, appropriate
information that could be pertinent to analysis of environmental
consequences, identification of significant issues, and identification
of potential alternatives.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the Environmental Impact Statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the scoping period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
Dated: August 1, 2017.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-18016 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P