Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Amendment to the Administrative Consent Order, Grain Processing Corporation, Muscatine, Iowa, 40491-40493 [2017-17417]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Consideration (REC) supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated in the ADDRESSES
section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Amendment
to the Administrative Consent Order,
Grain Processing Corporation,
Muscatine, Iowa
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0627 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0627 Safety Zone; Atlantic
Ocean, Ocean City, NJ.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0143; FRL–9966–59–
Region 7]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
petty officer, warrant or commissioned
officer on board a Coast Guard vessel
and or on board another Federal, State,
or local law enforcement vessel assisting
the Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay
with enforcement of the safety zone.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the North
Atlantic Ocean within a 600 yard radius
of the fireworks barge in approximate
location latitude 39°16′22″ N., longitude
074°33′54″ W., in the vicinity of the
shoreline at Ocean City, NJ.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general safety
zone regulations found in § 165.23
apply to the safety zone created by this
temporary section.
(2) Under the general safety zone
regulations in § 165.23, persons may not
enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (b) of this section unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) To request permission to enter the
safety zone, contact the COTP or the
COTP’s representative on marine band
Jkt 241001
[FR Doc. 2017–18031 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52
■
16:00 Aug 24, 2017
Dated: August 21, 2017.
Scott E. Anderson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Delaware Bay.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
All persons and vessels in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced August 26, 2017, from
9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Iowa for the purpose of
incorporating an amendment to the
Administrative Consent Order (ACO) for
Grain Processing Corporation (GPC),
Muscatine, Iowa. The revision amends
the ACO to change the date for
completion of performance testing to
allow the state more time to complete
processing air construction permit
applications submitted by GPC and
specify testing requirements as
appropriate in the final permits. This
revision will not impact the schedule
for installation and operation of control
equipment, will not alter any other
compliance dates, and will not
adversely affect air quality in
Muscatine, Iowa. The state held a 30day comment period, during which no
comments were received.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective October 24, 2017, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by September 25,
2017. If EPA receives adverse comment,
we will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2017–0143, to https://
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40491
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
913–551–7039, or by email at
hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
This direct final action approves a
revision to the Iowa State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Iowa for the purpose of
incorporating an amendment to the
Administrative Consent Order (ACO)
with Grain Processing Corporation
(GPC), Muscatine, Iowa. The revision
changes the date for completion of
performance testing from May 31, 2017,
to May 31, 2018, and will allow the state
more time to complete processing air
construction permit applications
submitted by GPC and specify testing
requirements as appropriate in the final
permits. This amendment will not
impact the schedule for installation and
operation of control equipment, will not
alter any other compliance dates, and
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
40492
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
will not adversely affect air quality in
the Muscatine, Iowa, area.
The state held a 30-day comment
period, during which no comments
were received.
Additional information with respect
to this rule is included in the Technical
Support Document that is part of this
docket.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The state instituted a 30-day
comment period; no comments were
received. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, as
explained above and in more detail in
the Technical Support Document which
is part of this docket, the revision meets
the substantive SIP requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), including section
110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is EPA taking?
This direct final action approves a SIP
revision submitted by the State of Iowa
for the purpose of incorporating an
amendment to the Administrative
Consent Order (ACO) with Grain
Processing Corporation (GPC),
Muscatine, Iowa. Additional
information with respect to this rule is
included in the Technical Support
Document that is part of this docket.
We are publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to approve this SIP
revision. If adverse comments are
received on this direct final rule, we
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If
EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:35 Aug 24, 2017
Jkt 241001
by reference of a revision to Iowa’s EPAapproved State source-specific permits
described in the direct final
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 7 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
State Implementation Plan, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully Federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
1 62
PO 00000
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 24, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
40493
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 9, 2017.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Subpart Q—Iowa
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
2. In § 52.820, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘(29) Grain Processing Corporation’’ to
read as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
§ 52.820
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED IOWA SOURCE-SPECIFIC ORDERS/PERMITS
Name of source
Order/Permit No.
*
(29) Grain Processing Corporation.
*
*
*
*
*
Administrative Consent Order
No. 2014–AQ–A1.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
[IB Docket No. 12–267; FCC 17–100]
Implementation of Transmitter
Identification Requirements for Video
Uplink Transmissions
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) is issuing
this final rule to is waive a transmitter
identification requirement for certain
digital video transmissions that cannot
be made compliant by a software
upgrade and incorporate by reference a
new version of an existing standard.
DATES: Effective September 25, 2017.
The incorporation by reference of a
publication listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of September 25, 2017.
ADDRESSES: FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554
for full text of ‘‘Memorandum Opinion
and Order, FCC 17–100’’ (also at https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-17-100A1.pdf) and inspection of
material incorporated by reference. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for details.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
13:35 Aug 24, 2017
*
1–16–17
EPA approval date
*
12/1/14, 79 FR 71025;
amendment approved 8–
25–17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
Clay
DeCell, 202–418–0803, Clay.DeCell@
fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC
17–100, adopted July 28, 2017, and
released August 1, 2017. The full text of
this document is available at https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-17-100A1.pdf. It is also available
for inspection and copying during
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities, send an email
to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
& Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2017–17417 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
State effective
date
Jkt 241001
Synopsis
In the Part 25 Order, FCC 13–111, the
Commission concluded that adoption of
the Digital Video Broadcasting–Carrier
Identification (DVB–CID) standard for
digital video uplinks from temporaryfixed earth stations was appropriate to
address potential instances of harmful
interference, by making transmissions
more readily identifiable by satellite
operators. We continue to believe that
an added cost of a few hundred dollars
per unit is justified to achieve this goal
for earth station equipment that can
undergo a software upgrade. We also
agree with the overwhelming response
from commenters in this proceeding on
the implementation of the DVB–CID
standard, however, that the much more
significant expense of replacing older
equipment that cannot simply undergo
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
*
*
The last sentence of Paragraph 5, Section III and
Section VI are not approved by EPA as part of
the SIP.
*
a software update would be unduly
burdensome to operators, many of
which are small businesses. And
importantly, we note that no satellite
operators, the direct beneficiaries of the
DVB–CID requirement, opposed further
relief.
Based on the record, we conclude it
will serve the public interest to waive
47 CFR 25.281(b) for earth stations using
modulators manufactured before August
1, 2017, that cannot be made compliant
with the DVB–CID standard by a
software upgrade. This waiver will
allow use and resale of non-compliant
modulators until the end of their useful
life, but requires earth stations using
newly manufactured modulators to be
DVB–CID compliant. Other affected
earth stations must meet the DVB–CID
standard by September 3, 2017. We
conclude this treatment best balances
the costs and benefits of implementing
DVB–CID in light of the significant cost
disparity presented in the record. We
believe that the amount of equipment
affected by this waiver will steadily
decrease as such equipment reaches the
end of its useful life. Should the
Commission find that the continued
operation of non-compliant equipment
causes a pattern of complaints from
satellite operators that they are having
difficulty identifying the sources of any
harmful interference, the Commission
may revisit this waiver.
Procedural Matters
This document does not contain new
or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40491-40493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17417]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0143; FRL-9966-59-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Amendment to the Administrative Consent
Order, Grain Processing Corporation, Muscatine, Iowa
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Iowa for the purpose of incorporating
an amendment to the Administrative Consent Order (ACO) for Grain
Processing Corporation (GPC), Muscatine, Iowa. The revision amends the
ACO to change the date for completion of performance testing to allow
the state more time to complete processing air construction permit
applications submitted by GPC and specify testing requirements as
appropriate in the final permits. This revision will not impact the
schedule for installation and operation of control equipment, will not
alter any other compliance dates, and will not adversely affect air
quality in Muscatine, Iowa. The state held a 30-day comment period,
during which no comments were received.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 24, 2017,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by
September 25, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2017-0143, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7039, or by email at
hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
This direct final action approves a revision to the Iowa State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Iowa for the
purpose of incorporating an amendment to the Administrative Consent
Order (ACO) with Grain Processing Corporation (GPC), Muscatine, Iowa.
The revision changes the date for completion of performance testing
from May 31, 2017, to May 31, 2018, and will allow the state more time
to complete processing air construction permit applications submitted
by GPC and specify testing requirements as appropriate in the final
permits. This amendment will not impact the schedule for installation
and operation of control equipment, will not alter any other compliance
dates, and
[[Page 40492]]
will not adversely affect air quality in the Muscatine, Iowa, area.
The state held a 30-day comment period, during which no comments
were received.
Additional information with respect to this rule is included in the
Technical Support Document that is part of this docket.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The state instituted a
30-day comment period; no comments were received. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the Technical
Support Document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including
section 110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is EPA taking?
This direct final action approves a SIP revision submitted by the
State of Iowa for the purpose of incorporating an amendment to the
Administrative Consent Order (ACO) with Grain Processing Corporation
(GPC), Muscatine, Iowa. Additional information with respect to this
rule is included in the Technical Support Document that is part of this
docket.
We are publishing this direct final rule without a prior proposed
rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposed rule to approve this SIP revision. If adverse comments
are received on this direct final rule, we will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives
adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of a revision to
Iowa's EPA-approved State source-specific permits described in the
direct final amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference
by EPA into that plan, are fully Federally enforceable under sections
110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 24, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
[[Page 40493]]
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 9, 2017.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q--Iowa
0
2. In Sec. 52.820, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by revising
the entry ``(29) Grain Processing Corporation'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved Iowa Source-Specific Orders/Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of source Order/Permit No. effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(29) Grain Processing Corporation Administrative 1-16-17 12/1/14, 79 FR The last sentence
Consent Order No. 71025; amendment of Paragraph 5,
2014-AQ-A1. approved 8-25-17, Section III and
[insert Federal Section VI are not
Register citation]. approved by EPA as
part of the SIP.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-17417 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
