Eligibility for Supplemental Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance, 39974-39976 [2017-17587]
Download as PDF
39974
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0731 to read as
follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T08–0731 Safety Zone; Mississippi
River, New Orleans, LA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Mississippi River between mile markers
96 and 96.5 Above Head of Passes.
(b) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 7:50 p.m. through 8:50
p.m. on October 28, 2017.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:06 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New Orleans (COTP) or designated
representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard assigned to units under the
operational control of USCG Sector New
Orleans.
(2) Vessels requiring entry into this
safety zone must request permission
from the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF–FM Channel 16 or 67.
(3) Persons and vessels permitted to
enter this safety zone must transit at
their slowest safe speed and comply
with all lawful directions issued by the
COTP or the designated representative.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or a designated representative will
inform the public through Broadcast
Notices to Mariners of any changes in
the planned schedule.
Dated: August 9, 2017.
Wayne R. Arguin,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2017–17479 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 8
RIN 2900–AQ03
Eligibility for Supplemental ServiceDisabled Veterans’ Insurance
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the ServiceDisabled Veterans’ Insurance (S–DVI)
program in order to explain that a
person who was granted S–DVI as of the
date of death under is not eligible for
supplemental S–DVI because the
insured’s total disability did not begin
after the date of the insured’s
application for insurance and while the
insurance was in force under premiumpaying conditions.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to: Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026 (this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
is not a toll-free telephone number).
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AQ03—Eligibility for Supplemental
Service-Disabled Veterans’ Insurance.’’
Copies of comments received will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except Federal
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment (this is not a toll-free
telephone number). In addition,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Weaver, Department of Veterans Affairs
Insurance Center (310/290B), 5000
Wissahickon Avenue, Philadelphia, PA
19144, (215) 842–2000, ext. 4263 (this is
not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38
U.S.C. 1922(a), a veteran ‘‘suffering from
a disability or disabilities for which
compensation would be payable if 10
per centum or more in degree and
except for which such person would be
insurable according to the standards of
good health’’ is eligible for S–DVI up to
a maximum of $10,000 upon
‘‘application in writing made within
two years from the date serviceconnection of such disability is
determined by the Secretary and
payment of premiums as provided in
this subchapter.’’ See 38 U.S.C. 1903
(amount of insurance). Section 1922(b)
of title 38, United States Code, provides
in pertinent part that a veteran who
qualifies for insurance under 38 U.S.C.
1922(a) but who did not apply for such
insurance and who was mentally
incompetent from a service-connected
disability, remained mentally
incompetent until the date of death, and
died before the appointment of a
guardian or within 2 years after the
appointment of a guardian ‘‘shall be
deemed to have applied for and to have
been granted such insurance, as of the
date of death.’’ See 38 U.S.C. 1922(b).
VA refers to insurance provided under
38 U.S.C 1922(b) as ‘‘gratuitous’’
insurance.
‘‘Any person insured under section
1922(a) [of title 38, United States Code,]
who qualifies for a waiver of [S–DVI]
premiums under [38 U.S.C.] 1912 . . . is
eligible’’ for supplemental S–DVI of up
to $30,000. 38 U.S.C. 1922A(a). Section
1912(a) of title 38, United States Code,
states in pertinent part:
[P]ayment of premiums on insurance may
be waived during the continuous total
disability of the insured . . . if such
disability began . . . after the date of the
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
insured’s application for insurance, [and]
. . . while the insurance was in force under
premium-paying conditions . . . [.]
In Martin v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App.
451, 458 (2014), the U.S. Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans
Court) held that a person granted S–DVI
‘‘as of the date of death’’ under section
1922(b) satisfies the first requirement for
supplemental S–DVI in 38 U.S.C.
1922A(a), i.e., insurance under 38
U.S.C. 1922(a), because a grant of S–DVI
under section 1922(b) is treated, by
operation of law, as an award of the
insurance under section 1922(a).
However, the Veterans Court also held
that a person granted S–DVI under
section 1922(b) is not eligible for
supplemental S–DVI because the
following two requirements for a
premium waiver in section 1912(a)
cannot be satisfied. First, the total
disability of a person insured under S–
DVI under 38 U.S.C. 1922(b) began
before rather than after the date of
application for S–DVI because as
provided in the statute, the person is
‘‘deemed to have applied for and to
have been granted such insurance[ ] as
of the date of death.’’ See Id. at 458–59.
Second, the insured’s total disability did
not begin while the S–DVI was in force
under premium paying conditions
because as explained above, the person
was granted S–DVI as of the date of
death under section 1922(b) and
therefore, the insured would not have
been required to pay premiums. See Id.
at 459.
VA proposes to add section 8.34 to
title 38, Code of Federal Regulations,
which would codify the last two Martin
holdings by explaining that a grant of
supplemental S–DVI is precluded if S–
DVI was granted under section 1922(b).
This would reflect the Veterans Court’s
conclusion that the insured cannot
qualify for a waiver of premiums under
38 U.S.C. 1912(a) because the insured’s
total disability did not begin after the
date of the insured’s application for
insurance and while the insurance was
in force under premium-paying
conditions.
VA’s proposed regulation would
promote the continued viability of the
S–DVI program. The S–DVI program is
not self-supporting because S–DVI
insureds pay standard premium rates
which account for age but not their
disabilities. See 38 U.S.C. 1922(a)
(computation of premium rates). As a
result, the S–DVI program requires an
annual subsidy from the U.S. Treasury.
VA’s budget submission for FY 2017
requested an appropriation of $77.6
million. VA estimates that, if veterans’
beneficiaries were entitled to receive
both gratuitous S–DVI and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:06 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
supplemental S–DVI for which no
premiums were paid due to the death of
the insured, the costs to the S–DVI
program would increase by more than
$1 million per year.
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as proposed to be revised
by this rulemaking, would represent
VA’s implementation of its legal
authority on this subject. Other than
future amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance
or procedures would be authorized. All
existing or subsequent VA guidance
would be read to conform with this
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed regulatory
action have been examined and it has
been determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39975
found as a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s Web site at
www.va.gov/orpm by following the link
for ‘‘VA Regulations Published.’’
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action contains no provision
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521); no new or
proposed revised collections of
information would be associated with
this proposed rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that the
adoption of this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly
affect any small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
1 year. This rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is
64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on August 15,
2017, for publication.
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
39976
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Dated: August 15, 2017.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation
Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 8
Life insurance, Veterans.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 8 as set forth below:
PART 8—NATIONAL SERVICE LIFE
INSURANCE
1. The authority citation for part 8
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1901–1929,
1981–1988, unless otherwise noted.
2. Adding new section 8.34 to read as
follows:
■
§ 8.34 Ineligibility for insurance under
section 1922A of title 38, U.S.C.
(supplemental Service-Disabled Veterans’
Insurance) if person insured under section
1922(b) of title 38, U.S.C.
A person who is granted ServiceDisabled Veterans’ Insurance under 38
U.S.C. 1922(b) is not eligible for
supplemental Service-Disabled
Veterans’ Insurance under 38 U.S.C.
1922A.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1912, 1922, 1922A)
[FR Doc. 2017–17587 Filed 8–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 86
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0827; FRL–9966–91–
OAR]
Public Hearing for Reconsideration of
the Final Determination of the Mid-term
Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Standards for Model Years
2022–2025 Light-Duty Vehicles
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Announcement of public
hearing.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing a public
hearing to be held in Washington, DC on
September 6, 2017 for the notice
‘‘Request for Comment on
Reconsideration of the Final
Determination of the Mid-term
Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Standards for Model Years
2022–2025 Light-duty Vehicles; Request
for Comment on Model Year 2021
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards’’
announced August 10, 2017 and
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Aug 22, 2017
Jkt 241001
projected to be published on August 21,
2017. In the document signed on August
10, 2017, EPA announced that it is
reconsidering whether the light-duty
vehicle greenhouse gas standards
previously established for model years
2022–2025 are appropriate under
section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act and
invited stakeholders to submit any
comments, data, and information they
believe are relevant to the
Administrator’s reconsideration of the
January 2017 Mid-term Evaluation Final
Determination and in particular,
highlight any new information. EPA
also requested comment on the separate
question of whether the light-duty
vehicle greenhouse gas standards
established for model year 2021 remain
appropriate, regardless of the agency’s
decision on the Mid-term Evaluation.
DATES: The public hearing will be held
on September 6, 2017, at the location
noted below under ADDRESSES. The
hearing will begin at 9 a.m. and end
when all parties present who wish to
speak have had an opportunity to do so.
Parties wishing to testify at the hearing
should notify EPA by August 30, 2017,
by sending an email to Hearing
RegistrationlASD@epa.gov or by
contacting the contact person listed
below under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Additional information
regarding the hearing appears below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:.
Any updates made to any aspect of the
hearing, including any change to the
location of the hearing, will be posted
online at https://www.epa.gov/
regulations-emissions-vehicles-andengines/midterm-evaluation-light-dutyvehicle-ghg-emissions. The EPA does
not intend to publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing any such
updates. Please go to https://
www.epa.gov/regulations-emissionsvehicles-and-engines/midtermevaluation-light-duty-vehicle-ghgemissions for more information on the
public hearing.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at
the following location: Renaissance
Washington, DC Downtown Hotel, 999
Ninth Street NW., Washington, DC,
USA, 20001 (phone number 202–898–
9000). A complete set of documents
related to the Mid-term Evaluation are
available for public inspection through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket
Identification No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–
0827. Documents can also be viewed at
the EPA Docket Center, located at 1301
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 3334,
Washington, DC between 8:30 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Lieske, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ),
Assessment and Standards Division
(ASD), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann
Arbor MI 48105; telephone number:
(734) 214–4584; fax number: (734) 214–
4816; email address: Hearing
RegistrationlASD@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the public hearing is to
provide the public an opportunity to
present oral comments related to the
notice ‘‘Request for Comment on
Reconsideration of the Final
Determination of the Mid-term
Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Standards for Model Years
2022–2025 Light-duty Vehicles; Request
for Comment on Model Year 2021
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards’’
projected to be published on August 21,
2017. Once EPA learns how many
people have registered to speak at the
public hearing, we will allocate an
appropriate amount of time to each
participant, allowing time for necessary
breaks. In addition, we will reserve a
block of time for anyone else in the
audience who wants to give testimony.
For planning purposes, each speaker
should anticipate speaking for no more
than five minutes, although we may
need to shorten that time if there is a
large turnout. We request that you bring
two copies of your statement or other
material for the EPA panel.
EPA will conduct the hearings
informally, and technical rules of
evidence will not apply. We will
arrange for a written transcript of the
hearing and keep the official record for
the notice open until the close of the
comment period to allow speakers to
submit supplementary information. You
may make arrangements for copies of
the transcripts directly with the court
reporter. Panel members may ask
clarifying questions during the oral
statements but will not respond to the
statements at that time. Written
statements and supporting information
submitted during the comment period
will be considered with the same weight
as oral comments and supporting
information presented at the public
hearing. Written comments must be
received by the last day of the comment
period.
How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
You may learn more about the Midterm Evaluation by visiting EPA’s Web
site https://www.epa.gov/regulationsemissions-vehicles-and-engines/
midterm-evaluation-light-duty-vehicle-
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39974-39976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17587]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 8
RIN 2900-AQ03
Eligibility for Supplemental Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance (S-DVI)
program in order to explain that a person who was granted S-DVI as of
the date of death under is not eligible for supplemental S-DVI because
the insured's total disability did not begin after the date of the
insured's application for insurance and while the insurance was in
force under premium-paying conditions.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to: Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026 (this
is not a toll-free telephone number). Comments should indicate that
they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AQ03--Eligibility for
Supplemental Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance.'' Copies of comments
received will be available for public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays).
Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment (this is not a toll-free
telephone number). In addition, comments may be viewed online through
the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Weaver, Department of Veterans
Affairs Insurance Center (310/290B), 5000 Wissahickon Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA 19144, (215) 842-2000, ext. 4263 (this is not a toll-
free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38 U.S.C. 1922(a), a veteran
``suffering from a disability or disabilities for which compensation
would be payable if 10 per centum or more in degree and except for
which such person would be insurable according to the standards of good
health'' is eligible for S-DVI up to a maximum of $10,000 upon
``application in writing made within two years from the date service-
connection of such disability is determined by the Secretary and
payment of premiums as provided in this subchapter.'' See 38 U.S.C.
1903 (amount of insurance). Section 1922(b) of title 38, United States
Code, provides in pertinent part that a veteran who qualifies for
insurance under 38 U.S.C. 1922(a) but who did not apply for such
insurance and who was mentally incompetent from a service-connected
disability, remained mentally incompetent until the date of death, and
died before the appointment of a guardian or within 2 years after the
appointment of a guardian ``shall be deemed to have applied for and to
have been granted such insurance, as of the date of death.'' See 38
U.S.C. 1922(b). VA refers to insurance provided under 38 U.S.C 1922(b)
as ``gratuitous'' insurance.
``Any person insured under section 1922(a) [of title 38, United
States Code,] who qualifies for a waiver of [S-DVI] premiums under [38
U.S.C.] 1912 . . . is eligible'' for supplemental S-DVI of up to
$30,000. 38 U.S.C. 1922A(a). Section 1912(a) of title 38, United States
Code, states in pertinent part:
[P]ayment of premiums on insurance may be waived during the
continuous total disability of the insured . . . if such disability
began . . . after the date of the
[[Page 39975]]
insured's application for insurance, [and] . . . while the insurance
was in force under premium-paying conditions . . . [.]
In Martin v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 451, 458 (2014), the U.S. Court
of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) held that a person
granted S-DVI ``as of the date of death'' under section 1922(b)
satisfies the first requirement for supplemental S-DVI in 38 U.S.C.
1922A(a), i.e., insurance under 38 U.S.C. 1922(a), because a grant of
S-DVI under section 1922(b) is treated, by operation of law, as an
award of the insurance under section 1922(a). However, the Veterans
Court also held that a person granted S-DVI under section 1922(b) is
not eligible for supplemental S-DVI because the following two
requirements for a premium waiver in section 1912(a) cannot be
satisfied. First, the total disability of a person insured under S-DVI
under 38 U.S.C. 1922(b) began before rather than after the date of
application for S-DVI because as provided in the statute, the person is
``deemed to have applied for and to have been granted such insurance[ ]
as of the date of death.'' See Id. at 458-59. Second, the insured's
total disability did not begin while the S-DVI was in force under
premium paying conditions because as explained above, the person was
granted S-DVI as of the date of death under section 1922(b) and
therefore, the insured would not have been required to pay premiums.
See Id. at 459.
VA proposes to add section 8.34 to title 38, Code of Federal
Regulations, which would codify the last two Martin holdings by
explaining that a grant of supplemental S-DVI is precluded if S-DVI was
granted under section 1922(b). This would reflect the Veterans Court's
conclusion that the insured cannot qualify for a waiver of premiums
under 38 U.S.C. 1912(a) because the insured's total disability did not
begin after the date of the insured's application for insurance and
while the insurance was in force under premium-paying conditions.
VA's proposed regulation would promote the continued viability of
the S-DVI program. The S-DVI program is not self-supporting because S-
DVI insureds pay standard premium rates which account for age but not
their disabilities. See 38 U.S.C. 1922(a) (computation of premium
rates). As a result, the S-DVI program requires an annual subsidy from
the U.S. Treasury. VA's budget submission for FY 2017 requested an
appropriation of $77.6 million. VA estimates that, if veterans'
beneficiaries were entitled to receive both gratuitous S-DVI and
supplemental S-DVI for which no premiums were paid due to the death of
the insured, the costs to the S-DVI program would increase by more than
$1 million per year.
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as proposed to be
revised by this rulemaking, would represent VA's implementation of its
legal authority on this subject. Other than future amendments to this
regulation or governing statutes, no contrary guidance or procedures
would be authorized. All existing or subsequent VA guidance would be
read to conform with this rulemaking if possible or, if not possible,
such guidance would be superseded by this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed regulatory action have been examined and
it has been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours
after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at
www.va.gov/orpm by following the link for ``VA Regulations Published.''
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action contains no provision constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521); no new or proposed revised collections of information would be
associated with this proposed rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that the adoption of this rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly affect any small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any 1 year. This rule would have no such effect on State,
local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for
Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on August 15, 2017, for publication.
[[Page 39976]]
Dated: August 15, 2017.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 8
Life insurance, Veterans.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR
part 8 as set forth below:
PART 8--NATIONAL SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 8 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1901-1929, 1981-1988, unless
otherwise noted.
0
2. Adding new section 8.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 8.34 Ineligibility for insurance under section 1922A of title
38, U.S.C. (supplemental Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance) if
person insured under section 1922(b) of title 38, U.S.C.
A person who is granted Service-Disabled Veterans' Insurance under
38 U.S.C. 1922(b) is not eligible for supplemental Service-Disabled
Veterans' Insurance under 38 U.S.C. 1922A.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1912, 1922, 1922A)
[FR Doc. 2017-17587 Filed 8-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P