Safety Zones; Ice Covered Waterways in the Fifth Coast Guard District, 39665-39671 [2017-17748]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104–193, 110
Stat. 2105, 2189; sec. 202, Pub. L. 108–203,
118 Stat. 509 (42 U.S.C. 902 note).
2. Amend appendix 1 to subpart P of
part 404, by revising the first sentence
of 11.00H4 to read as follows:
■
Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404—
Listing of Impairments
*
*
*
*
*
11.00 NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS
*
*
*
*
*
H. * * *
■ 4. Counting seizures. The period
specified in 11.02A, B, C, or D cannot
begin earlier than one month after you
began prescribed treatment. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–17724 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0778]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Indian
River, Titusville, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the NASA
Railroad Bridge (Jay Jay Bridge) across
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(Indian River), mile 876.6, Titusville,
Florida. The deviation is necessary to
allow the bridge owner, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) to repair the bridge. Due to the
type of repairs this bridge will be
required to remain closed to navigation
periodically throughout the day. This
deviation is deemed necessary for the
continued safe operation of the bridge.
DATES: This deviation is effective
without actual notice from August 22,
2017 through 4 p.m. on September 26,
2017. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from August
17, 2017 at 8 a.m. until August 22, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, USCG–2017–0778 is available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH’’. Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated
with this deviation.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email LT Allan Storm,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville,
Waterways Management Division;
telephone 904–714–7557, email
Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NASA
requested a temporary deviation from
the operating schedule that governs the
NASA Railroad Bridge (Jay Jay Bridge),
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Indian
River), mile 876.6, Titusville, Florida.
The bridge is a single leaf bascule
railroad bridge with a seven foot vertical
clearance in the closed position. The
normal operating schedule for the
bridge is found in 33 CFR 117.261(j).
The deviation period is from 8 a.m. on
August 17, 2017 to 4 p.m. on September
26, 2017. During this period, the bridge
is allowed to remain closed to
navigation from 8 a.m. to noon and from
1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridge in the closed position may do so
at any time. The bridge will be able to
open for emergencies and there is no
immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. The Coast Guard will also inform
the users of the waterways through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessel operators can
arrange their transits to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary
deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 17, 2017.
Barry L. Dragon,
Director, Bridge Branch, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2017–17707 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0051]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Ice Covered Waterways
in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39665
The Coast Guard is
establishing 11 safety zones on certain
navigable waters of the Fifth Coast
Guard District. This action is necessary
to promote navigational safety, provide
for the safety of life and property, and
facilitate the reasonable demands of
commerce where a threat to navigation
exists due to ice covered waterways.
This rule is intended to mitigate the
potential threat ice poses to the
maritime public in the Fifth Coast
Guard District by implementing control
measures on vessels operating in certain
ice covered waterways.
DATES: This rule is effective September
21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2015–
0051 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Doug Simpson, Fifth Coast
Guard District, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 757–398–6346, email
douglas.c.simpson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
SNPRM Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On July 9, 2015, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Regulated
Navigation Area; Ice Covered
Waterways in the Fifth Coast Guard
District (80 FR 39403). The purpose of
that proposed regulated navigation area
(RNA) was to mitigate the
aforementioned potential threat ice
poses to the maritime public in the Fifth
Coast Guard District by implementing
control measures on vessels of certain
characteristics. We invited comments on
our proposed regulatory action related
to that RNA. During the comment
period that ended October 7, 2015, we
received a total of six comments coming
from six submitters. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Based on consideration of the
comments received in response to the
NPRM and further analysis, the Coast
Guard proposed to establish 11 safety
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
39666
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
zones on certain navigable waters of the
Fifth Coast Guard District instead of 1
RNA. On February 9, 2017, the Coast
Guard published an SNPRM titled
Safety Zones; Ice Covered Waterways in
the Fifth Coast Guard District (82 FR
9978). There we stated why we issued
the SNPRM, replied to the comments
received in response to the NPRM, and
invited comments on the proposed
regulatory action. During the comment
period on the SNPRM that ended April
10, 2017, we received a total of 11
comments coming from four submitters.
No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Coast Guard has determined that during
an average or severe winter, the
presence of ice in waterways presents
numerous hazards to vessels. Such
hazards include vessels becoming beset
or dragged off course, sinking or
grounding and creating hazards to
navigation. The presence of ice in a
waterway may hamper a vessel’s ability
to maneuver and impose additional
loads on a vessel’s hull, propulsion
system and appendages. Blockage of sea
suctions can cause the main engine
cooling system to overheat, requiring
reduced power to be used or the engine
to be shut down completely. Visual aids
to navigation may become submerged,
destroyed, or moved off station,
potentially misleading the vessel
operator to unsafe waters. Vessels
operating in these hazardous conditions
could introduce a clear and present
danger to the maritime public and
environment. The purpose of this rule is
to mitigate the potential threat ice poses
to the maritime public in the Fifth Coast
Guard District by implementing control
measures on vessels operating in certain
ice covered waterways.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 11
comments from four submitters on our
SNPRM published February 9, 2017.
One comment was generally supportive
of the rule.
In response to one comment, we
changed the regulatory text that defined
the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway to
clarify the safety zone’s northern
boundaries. The safety zone’s northern
boundary uses the Fifth Coast Guard
District’s boundary as defined in 33 CFR
80.501(b)–(c) and 80.502. We changed
the rule to define a position for the
entrance to Manasquan Inlet. We also
changed the rule to define the southern
boundary of the zone at Cape May Inlet,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
Cape May, NJ as it is defined in 33 CFR
80.502 (g). We did not define the width
of safety zone in areas where the New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway passes
through open water areas, as the
commenter requested. However, we
changed the regulatory text to explicitly
include the navigable waters
Manasquan River at its tributaries,
Metedeconk River and its tributaries,
Toms River and Barnegat Bay and its
tributaries, Mahahawkin Bay, Little Egg
Harbor, Great Bay to Absecon Bay,
Lakes Bay, Great Egg Harbor Bay, Peck
Bay, Ludlam Bay, Townsend Sound,
Stites Sound, Great Sound, Grassy
Sound, Taylor Sound, Sunset Lake,
Jarvis Sound and Cape May Harbor. The
comment also requested we provide the
horizontal Datum. We used NAD 83 and
changed the regulatory text of each
safety zone to incorporate that reference.
Two comments requested that the
Coast Guard provide positions for the
bridges that serve as boundaries for the
Delaware River, Upper Delaware River,
Baltimore Harbor and approaches,
Chesapeake Channel to Cove Point,
Chesapeake Channel between Cove
Point and Smith Point, and Lower
Potomac River, Potomac River, and the
Upper Potomac River and Anacostia
River zones. As a result, these positions
were provided in the regulatory text
where practical. The Coast Guard
determined the positions by plotting the
locations on National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
nautical charts for the following bridges:
Betsy Ross (state route 90) fixed
highway bridge, Trenton—Morrisville
(state route 1) highway bridge, Governor
Harry W. Nice (US–301) Memorial
Bridge, Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I–
95/I–495) Bridge, the Francis Scott Key
(US–29) Bridge, and the John Philip
Sousa (Pennsylvania Avenue SE)
Bridge. The William P. Lane, Jr (US–50/
301) Memorial Bridge is curved, and we
find it impractical to sufficiently define
this boundary using latitude and
longitude in this rule. Instead, the
southern boundary of the Baltimore
Harbor and approaches safety zone and
the northern boundary of the
Chesapeake Channel to Cove Point
safety zone were changed to the
southernmost edge of the east-bound
span of the of the William P. Lane, Jr
(US–50/301) Memorial Bridge.
One comment requested that we
describe the end and turning points of
all the lines that run along the latitude
parallel to another location. We changed
the regulatory text of the following
safety zones: Chesapeake Channel to
Cove Point: Provided positions for the
eastern and western extent of the
southern boundary; Chesapeake
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Channel between Cove Point and Smith
Point, and Lower Potomac: Provided
positions for the eastern and western
extent of the northern boundary, and the
positions defining southern boundary
across the Chesapeake Bay and Tangier
Sound; Upper Potomac River and
Anacostia River: Provided position for
Hains Point; Chesapeake Bay and
Tangier Sound: the positions defining
the eastern and western extent of the
northern boundary across the
Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound and
the eastern and western extent of the
southern boundary along latitude
37°45′00.0″ N.
One comment proposed additional
smaller zones, with the desire to
minimize restriction in portions of the
zones that are not impacted by ice. The
Coast Guard does not agree with the
addition of the proposed zones because
the operational complexity and
feasibility of enacting those zones is
counter to public interest due to the
significant amount of time it would take
to effectively manage compliance.
However, to address the comments, we
changed the regulatory text in
§ 165.550(d)(1) to allow each COTP to
set ice conditions for any zone in this
rule, or a portion thereof. The COTP
may choose not to activate an entire
zone if the ice prevalence and thickness
is limited in such a way it would be too
burdensome to activate the entire zone.
The same commenter stated that there
are no provisions for Maryland
Department of Natural Resources to
request or obtain a waiver from the
COTP for icebreaking operations. We
changed the rule’s definition of public
vessels in response to this comment to
mean vessels owned or bareboat
chartered and operated by the United
States, or by a State or political
subdivision thereof, or by a foreign
nation, except when such vessel is
engaged in commercial service. Because
this definition includes vessels engaged
in law enforcement, we removed
‘‘engaged in law enforcement’’ from
paragraph (d)(1).
An anonymous comment asserted that
the Coast Guard did not evaluate the
impact of a ‘‘business as usual
approach’’ as an alternative to this rule.
We do not agree with this assertion
because the existing means by which
the Coast Guard restricted vessel
operations in ice covered waterways
was specifically addressed in the NPRM
and SNPRM (82 FR 9978). As stated in
the SNPRM, permanent safety zones are
the most appropriate from a regulatory
perspective and will ensure consistency
throughout the Fifth Coast Guard
District. Furthermore, as stated in the
SNPRM, the Coast Guard finds relying
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
solely on the authority provided by 33
CFR part 6 is not feasible when ice
presents hazardous conditions. Sole
reliance on this authority involving the
protection and security of vessels,
harbors, and waterfront facilities would
require the COTP to take individual
action against every vessel desiring to
operate in the area, which is counter to
public interest due to the significant
amount of time it would take to issue
and administer an effective amount of
orders.
The same anonymous commenter
stated that the Coast Guard did not
adequately address ‘‘biophysical
impacts,’’ details of the ‘‘obvious
cultural and social impacts’’ to
recreational activities on the water,
environmental justice, and economic
impacts of alternatives to the proposed
rule. The comment was vague and
lacked sufficient supporting information
needed to determine its validity. We
were unable to obtain clarification from
this anonymous commenter regarding
the various issues mentioned, but the
Coast Guard believes this rule remains
as one that is a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment, and the analysis
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. Similarly, one
commenter stated that these regulations
would have an impact on persons who
make a living by fishing, crabbing, and
oystering on the Chesapeake Bay that
act as small businesses. The Coast
Guard received no comments from the
Small Business Administration on this
rulemaking, and the Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
One comment stated, ‘‘Depending on
which shoreline is being used for
measurement, a percentage value of
coverage may vary considerably, which
will affect which areas are selected for
closure. It is not known which shoreline
standard is being used . . .’’ In the
context of this rule, the shoreline is the
extent of navigable waters as they are
defined in 33 CFR part 2. We replaced
the term shoreline with the term ‘‘the
extent of navigable waters’’ to clarify the
physical reference point from which ice
accumulation will be measured for the
purposes of enforcing the rule. The
zones cover large geographic areas so
that a disproportionate amount of ice
accumulation along a shoreline will not
have an impact on when the Ice
Conditions are set. To clarify the
jurisdictional extents of the safety
zones, the term ‘‘and its tributaries’’ was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
added to Delaware Bay, Delaware River,
and Upper Delaware River zones.
The same commenter expressed
concern that the measurement errors or
tolerance that would affect timings of
‘‘closure events’’ is unknown. No
changes were made to this rule based on
this comment. The Coast Guard finds it
reasonable to expect that vessel
operators can discern between the ice
prevalence and thicknesses that are
listed in the regulatory text in order to
determine when restrictions are in
place. The Coast Guard has consistently
received reliable and accurate reports of
ice conditions from these same vessel
operators in the past. Furthermore, as
stated in the regulatory text, the COTP
can notify mariners of Ice Conditions
and associated restrictions via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and other methods
described in 33 CFR 165.7. Vessel
operators that encounter ice covered
waterways and are uncertain if the zone
is in effect may contact the cognizant
COTP to determine the waterway status.
The same commenter asked for a list
of ‘‘protected waters’’ and their
boundary coordinates. This rule defines
‘‘protected waters’’ as, ‘‘sheltered waters
such as harbors or basins that present no
special hazards.’’ This term is used in
this regulation so ‘‘vessels may transit
within protected waters to facilitate
icebreaking operations and protect
infrastructure and property without
COTP permission.’’ The commenter
specifically asked if contractors moving
work barges around bridges would be
considered as operating in protected
waters and if fishermen attempting to
recover nets or other fisheries gear
would be considered as protecting
infrastructure or property. No changes
were made based on this comment. It is
not feasible for the Coast Guard to
provide a list of activity in every area
that could be considered ‘‘protected
waters’’ in this rule because the
conclusion would vary depending on
the vessel, environment, nature of the
activity, and infrastructure present at
the time the Ice Condition is in effect.
The Coast Guard concludes that the
present definition provides sufficient
parameters that will promote
navigational safety, provide for the
safety of life and property, and facilitate
the reasonable demands of commerce.
Finally, one commenter requested the
Coast Guard institute a process whereby
the final rule is subject to future review
and comment by industry stakeholders
at regular intervals to ensure that it
remains appropriate to current
conditions. The Coast Guard will
monitor the effectiveness when
executing and enforcing the rule, and
ensures that our agency will engage in
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39667
proper notice-and-comment procedures
if we see a need to change the rule.
This rule establishes 11 safety zones
on the navigable waters of the Fifth
Coast Guard District. This imposes
restrictions on vessels operating within
the safety zones or a portion of the
zones where a threat to navigation exists
due to ice covered waterways. Vessels
transiting in protected waters, such as
within a marina, harbor or basin, for the
purposes of facilitating icebreaking
operations and protecting infrastructure
and property would be exempt from the
controls. Vessels capable of operating in
the prevailing ice condition outside of
protected waters may be allowed to
operate within the safety zones if
granted permission by the cognizant
COTP.
Under this rule, a vessel needs
permission from the cognizant COTP or
the District Commander to enter or
continue transiting a zone if, when
approaching or after entering a safety
zone, the vessel encounters ice of a
given thickness, unless the COTP or the
District Commander has set an ice
condition for the zone or a portion of
the zone and the vessel meets the
associated requirements to transit the
zone. Descriptions of the three ice
conditions and vessel requirements to
transit are listed below. Under:
• Condition One, when 30 percent of
a zone is reported covered with ice 1 to
3 inches thick, only steel hull vessels
would be allowed to transit the zone;
• Condition Two, when 30 to 90
percent of a zone is reported covered
with ice 3 to 9 inches thick, only steel
hull vessels with a 1,500 minimum shaft
horsepower and a main engine cooling
system design that prevents blockage
from ice would be allowed to transit the
zone; and
• Condition Three, when 90 percent
or more of a zone is reported covered
with ice 9 inches thick, only steel hull
vessels with a 1,500 minimum shaft
horsepower and a main engine cooling
system design that prevents blockage
from ice in a vessel convoy would be
allowed to transit the zone.
For non-steel-hull vessels, entry into
or continuing to transit the zone is
prohibited without permission from the
cognizant COTP or District Commander
if, when approaching the zone or after
entering the safety zone, the vessel
encounters ice of 1⁄2-inch or more in
thickness. When this thickness of ice is
reached in a zone, non-steel hull vessels
moored or docked in the zone need not
exit the zone, but these vessels may not
transit the zone without permission of
the cognizant COTP or District
Commander. There is an exemption for
vessels that need to transit in protected
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
39668
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
waters, such as within a marina, harbor,
or basin, to facilitate icebreaking
operations and protect infrastructure
and property. The regulatory text
appears at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Executive Order 13771
directs agencies to control regulatory
costs through a budgeting process. This
rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance
it is exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on our assessment that
although this regulation could limit or
prevent marine traffic from transiting
certain waterways in the Fifth Coast
Guard District, the effect of this
regulation would not be significant
because there is little vessel traffic
associated with recreational boating and
commercial fishing during enforcement
periods. The Coast Guard anticipates
implementing control measures for
limited durations of time. The cognizant
COTP will make notifications of the
regulated areas to the maritime public
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Moreover, vessel traffic
capable of operating in such conditions
will be allowed to enter into or transit
within the safety zones as specified by
the cognizant COTP.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
areas may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Act) (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their discretionary regulatory
actions. In particular, the Act addresses
actions that may result in the
expenditure by a State, local, or tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted
for inflation) or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing safety zones. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a Record of Environmental
Consideration (REC) supporting this
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
its tributaries in an area bound to the
south by a line drawn across the
Delaware River at the Betsy Ross (state
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
route 90) fixed highway bridge from
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
latitude 39°59′10.43″ N., longitude
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
075°04′11.03″ W. to latitude
requirements, Security measures,
39°58′58.65″ N., longitude 075°03′43.23″
Waterways.
W. The regulated area is bound to the
north by a line drawn across the
For the reasons discussed in the
Delaware River at the Trenton—
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
Morrisville (state route 1) highway
CFR part 165 as follows:
bridge from latitude 40°12′29.86″ N.,
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION longitude 074°46′11.00″ W. to latitude
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 40°12′34.93″ N., longitude 74°46′00.63″
W. (Datum NAD 83)
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
(iv) New Jersey Intracoastal
continues to read as follows:
Waterway: All navigable waters of New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NJICW),
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
bounded by the area defined by 33 CFR
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation 80.501(b)–(c) and § 80.502, commencing
No. 0170.1.
at the entrance to Manasquan Inlet at
latitude 40°06′03″ N., longitude
■ 2. Add § 165.550 to read as follows:
74°01′55″ W., continuing the entire
§ 165.550 Safety Zones; Ice covered
length of NJICW to include the
waterways within the Fifth Coast Guard
navigable waters Manasquan River at its
District.
tributaries, Metedeconk River and its
(a) Regulated areas. The following
tributaries, Toms River and Barnegat
areas are established as safety zones:
Bay and its tributaries, Mahahawkin
(1) Coast Guard Sector Delaware
Bay, Little Egg Harbor, Great Bay to
Bay—COTP Zone. (i) Delaware Bay: All Absecon Bay, Lakes Bay, Great Egg
navigable waters of Delaware Bay and
Harbor Bay, Peck Bay, Ludlam Bay,
Delaware River in an area bound to the
Townsend Sound, Stites Sound, Great
south by a line drawn across the
Sound, Grassy Sound, Taylor Sound,
entrance to Delaware Bay, commencing
Sunset Lake, Jarvis Sound and Cape
at Cape May Light (LLNR 155) latitude
May Harbor. This regulated area
38°55′59″ N., longitude 074°57′37″ W.;
terminates in the east at line drawn
thence southwest to Cape Henlopen,
across the seaward extremity of Cape
latitude 38°48′20.3″ N., longitude
May Inlet, Cape May, NJ and in the west
075°05′44.5″ W. The regulated area is
at line drawn across the entrance to the
bound to the north by a line drawn
Cape May Canal from latitude
across the Delaware River, commencing 38°58′03.72″ N., longitude 074°58′00.00″
at Liston Point, DE, latitude
W. to latitude 38°57′57.00″ N., longitude
39°25′03.07″ N., longitude 075°32′25.5″
074°58′00.80″ W. (Datum NAD 83)
W.; thence northeast to the extent of
(2) Coast Guard Sector Marylandnavigable waters at Hope Creek Jetty,
National Capital Region- COTP Zone. (i)
latitude 39°27′05.04″ N., longitude
Head of Chesapeake Bay to C&D Canal:
075°30′12.55″ W. (Datum NAD 83)
All navigable waters of the Upper
(ii) Delaware River: All navigable
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries,
waters of Delaware River and its
bound to the north by a line drawn from
tributaries, in an area bound to the
Hylands Point, MD, latitude 39°30′18″
south by a line drawn across the
N., longitude 075°55′37″ W.; thence east
Delaware River, commencing at Liston
across Elk River to the shoreline at Old
Point, DE, latitude 39°25′03.07″ N.,
Town Point Wharf, MD, latitude
longitude 075°32′25.5″ W.; thence
39°30′11.3″ N., longitude 075°54′57.1″
northeast to the extent of navigable
W. The regulated area is bound to the
waters at Hope Creek Jetty, latitude
south by a line drawn across the
39°27′05.04″ N., longitude 075°30′12.55″ Chesapeake Bay, commencing at North
W., including the navigable waters of
Point, MD, latitude 39°11′43.7″ N.,
the Salem River, Christina River, and
longitude 076°26′32.8″ W.; thence east
Schuylkill River. The regulated area is
to the extent of navigable waters at
bound to the north by a line drawn
Swan Point, latitude 39°08′41.7″ N.,
across the Delaware River at the Betsy
longitude 076°16′42.4″ W. (Datum NAD
Ross (state route 90) fixed highway
83)
(ii) Baltimore Harbor and approaches:
bridge from latitude 39°59′10.43″ N,
All navigable waters of the Chesapeake
longitude 075°04′11.03″ W to latitude
39°58′58.65″ N., longitude 075°03′43.23″ Bay and its tributaries, bound to the
north by a line drawn across the
W. (Datum NAD 83)
(iii) Upper Delaware River: All
Chesapeake Bay, commencing at North
navigable waters of Delaware River and
Point, MD, latitude 39°11′43.7″ N.,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39669
longitude 076°26′32.8″ W.; thence east
to the shoreline at Swan Point, latitude
39°08′41.7″ N., longitude 076°16′42.4″
W. The regulated area is bound to the
south by the southernmost edge of the
east-bound span of the William P. Lane,
Jr (US–50/301) Memorial Bridge.
(Datum NAD 83)
(iii) Chesapeake Channel to Cove
Point: All navigable waters of the
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries,
bound to the north by the southernmost
edge of the east-bound span of the
William P. Lane, Jr (US–50/301)
Memorial Bridge. The regulated area is
bound to the south by a line drawn
across the Chesapeake Bay commencing
in Cove Point in Calvert County, MD at
latitude 38°23′10.5″ N., longitude
076°22′52.9″W. and ending at a point in
Meekins Neck at latitude 38°23′14.9″ N.,
longitude 076°16′48.3″ W. (Datum NAD
83)
(iv) Chesapeake Channel between
Cove Point and Smith Point, and Lower
Potomac River: All navigable waters of
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries,
bound to the north by a line drawn
across the Chesapeake Bay commencing
in Cove Point in Calvert County, MD at
latitude 38°23′10.5″ N., longitude
076°22′52.9″ W. and ending at a point
in Meekins Neck at latitude 38°23′10.5″
N., longitude 076°16′48.3″ W.; and all
navigable waters of the Potomac River
bound to the north by a line drawn
across the Potomac River at the
Governor Harry W. Nice (US–301)
Memorial Bridge from latitude
38°21′33.30″ N., longitude
077°00′51.41″W. to latitude 38°21′48.22″
N., longitude 76°58′59.83″ W.,
connecting King George County, VA and
Charles County, MD. (Datum NAD 83)
(v) Potomac River: All navigable
waters of the Potomac River, bound to
the north by a line drawn across the
Potomac River at the Woodrow Wilson
Memorial (I–95/I–495) Bridge from
latitude 38°47′32.38″ N., longitude
077°02′22.15″ W. to latitude
38°47′33.83″ N., longitude 077°01′30.58″
W., connecting Alexandria, VA and
Prince George’s County, MD. The
regulated area is bound to the south by
a line drawn across the Potomac River
at the Governor Harry W. Nice (US–301)
Memorial Bridge from latitude
38°21′33.30″ N., longitude
077°00′51.41″W. to latitude 38°21′48.22″
N., longitude 76°58′59.83″ W.,
connecting King George County, VA and
Charles County, MD. (Datum NAD 83)
(vi) Upper Potomac River and
Anacostia River: All navigable waters of
the Potomac River, bound to the north
by a line drawn across the Potomac
River at the Francis Scott Key (US–29)
Bridge from latitude 38°54′03.51″ N.,
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
39670
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
longitude 077°04′13.18″ W. to latitude
38°54′13.68″ N., longitude 077°04′08.46″
W., connecting Rosslyn, VA and
Georgetown, Washington, DC, and
bound to the south by a line drawn
across the Potomac River at the
Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I–95/I–495)
Bridge from latitude 38°47′32.38″ N.,
longitude 077°02′22.15″ W. to latitude
38°47′33.83″ N., longitude 077°01′30.58″
W., connecting Alexandria, VA and
Prince George’s County, MD. All
navigable waters of Anacostia River and
Washington Channel bound to the north
by a line drawn across the Anacostia
River at the John Philip Sousa
(Pennsylvania Avenue SE) Bridge,
latitude 38°52′38.97″ N., longitude
076°58′46.48″ W. to latitude
38°52′34.08″ N., longitude 076°58′36.61″
W. and bound to the south by a line
drawn across the mouth of the
Anacostia River, from Hains Point at
latitude 38° 51′ 24.34″ N., longitude
077° 1′ 20.14″ W., south across
Anacostia River Channel to Giesboro
Point at latitude 38°50′51″ N., longitude
077°01′14″ W. at Joint Base AnacostiaBolling military installation. (Datum
NAD 83)
(3) Coast Guard Sector Hampton
Roads—COTP Zone—(i) Chesapeake
Bay and Tangier Sound: All navigable
waters of Chesapeake Bay, and its
tributaries, bound to the north by a line
drawn along the Maryland-Virginia
boundary, commencing in Virginia at
latitude 37°53′11″ N., longitude
76°14′15″ W., thence east along the
Maryland-Virginia boundary as it
proceeds across the Chesapeake Bay and
Pocomoke River, ending at the point
latitude 37°59′39.8″ N., longitude
75°37′27.4″ W. The regulated area is
bound to the south by a line drawn
across the Chesapeake Bay along
latitude 37°45′00.0″ N., commencing in
Northumberland County, VA at latitude
37°45′00.00″ N., longitude 76°18′44.32″
W. and ending in Chesconessex, in
Accomack County, VA at latitude
37°45′00.00″ N., longitude
75°48′39.53″W. (Datum NAD 83)
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Convoy means a group of vessels led
by U.S. Coast Guard assets or COTPdesignated vessels to assist vessels
moving through the ice.
COTP means the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port with jurisdiction over the
geographic area as defined in 33 CFR
subpart 3.25.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the cognizant COTP to assist in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
enforcing the safety zones described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
Horsepower means the total
maximum continuous shaft horsepower
of a vessel’s main propulsion
machinery.
Ice Condition One means when the
COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 30
percent of a safety zone defined in
paragraph (a) has been covered with ice
whose thickness is approximately 1 to 3
inches.
Ice Condition Two means when the
COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 30
percent to 90 percent of a safety zone
defined in paragraph (a) has been
covered with ice whose thickness is
approximately 3 to 9 inches.
Ice Condition Three means when the
COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 90
percent or more of a safety zone defined
in paragraph (a) has been covered with
ice whose thickness is 9 inches or
thicker.
Protected waters means sheltered
waters such as harbors or basins that
present no special hazards.
Public vessel means vessels owned or
bareboat chartered and operated by the
United States, or by a State or political
subdivision thereof, or by a foreign
nation, except when such vessel is
engaged in commercial service.
(c) Regulations—(1) Non-steel hull
vessels. Non-steel hull vessels may not
enter or transit within a safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section without permission from the
cognizant COTP or District Commander
if, when approaching the zone or after
entering the zone, the vessel encounters
ice of 1⁄2-inch or more in thickness.
When ice in a zone is 1⁄2-inch thick or
more, non-steel hull vessels moored or
docked in the zone need not exit the
zone. Except for as described in
paragraph (d)(4), non-steel hull vessels
may not enter or transit the zone
without permission of the cognizant
COTP or District Commander.
(2) Steel hull vessels. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, steel hull vessels may not enter
or transit within a safety zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section without
permission from the cognizant COTP or
District Commander in the following
circumstances:
(i) The vessel has less than 1,500
minimum shaft horsepower and
encounters ice 1 inch or more thick.
(ii) The vessel has a 1,500 minimum
shaft horsepower and a main engine
cooling system design that prevents
blockage from ice and encounters ice 3
inches or more thick.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(iii) The vessel is part of a vessel
convoy and has a 1,500 minimum shaft
horsepower and a main engine cooling
system design that prevents blockage
from ice and encounters ice 9 inches or
more thick.
(d) Permission to enter or transit. (1)
The COTP may set ice conditions, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section,
for any zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section, or a portion thereof, and
announce those conditions via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and other
methods described in 33 CFR 165.7.
Steel hull vessels prohibited from
entering or transiting a safety zone
under paragraph (c) of this section may
nonetheless enter or continue transiting
the safety zone without contacting the
COTP if the vessel is a public vessel or
the COTP has set an ice condition for
the safety zone and the vessel meets
these restrictions:
(i) Ice Condition One. Only steel hull
vessels may enter, operate in, or transit
though a safety zone when Ice
Condition One has been set for that
zone.
(ii) Ice Condition Two. Only steel hull
vessels with a 1,500 minimum shaft
horsepower and a main engine cooling
system design that prevents blockage
from ice, may enter, operate in, or
transit though a safety zone when Ice
Condition Two has been set for that
zone.
(iii) Ice Condition Three. Only steel
hull vessels with a 1,500 minimum shaft
horsepower and a main engine cooling
system design that prevents blockage
from ice, and that are part of a vessel
convoy, may enter, operate in, or transit
though a safety zone when Ice
Condition Three has been set for that
zone. These vessels may only transit an
Ice Condition Three zone during
daylight hours.
(2) Vessels prohibited from entering
or transiting a safety zone under
paragraph (c) of this section may request
permission to enter or continue
transiting by contacting the cognizant
COTP on VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHZ) or via telephone, as follows:
(i) COTP Delaware Bay: 215–271–
4940.
(ii) COTP Maryland-National Capital
Region: 410–576–2693.
(iii) COTP Hampton Roads: 757–483–
8567.
(3) Vessels granted permission to
enter, operate in, or transit though a
safety zone must do so in accordance
with the directions provided by the
cognizant COTP or designated
representative.
(4) Vessels may transit within
protected waters to facilitate icebreaking
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
operations and protect infrastructure
and property without COTP permission.
(e) Enforcement. The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHZ). The
cognizant COTP and his or her
designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number listed in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Meredith L. Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017–17748 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113; FRL–9966–66–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit
Exemptions and Definitions;
Withdrawal
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule: withdrawal.
AGENCY:
Due to adverse comments
received, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the June
29, 2017, direct final rule that would
have approved a revision to the Georgia
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
concerning changes to existing minor
source permitting exemptions and a
definition related to minor source
permitting exemptions. EPA stated in
the direct final rule that if EPA received
adverse comments by July 31, 2017, the
rule would be withdrawn and not take
effect.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
82 FR 29418 on June 29, 2017, is
withdrawn, effective August 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Phone
number: (404) 562–9089; Email:
akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
29, 2017 (82 FR 29418), EPA published
a direct final rulemaking to approve
portions of a SIP revision submitted by
the State of Georgia, through the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources’
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD), on September 19, 2006, with a
clarification submitted on November 6,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
2006. The SIP submission included
changes to existing minor source
permitting exemptions and a definition
related to minor source permitting
exemptions. On June 29, 2017 (82 FR
29469), EPA also published an
accompanying rulemaking proposing to
approve the portions of the
aforementioned SIP revision in the
event that EPA received adverse
comments on the direct final
rulemaking.
In the direct final rulemaking, EPA
explained that the Agency was
publishing the rule without prior
proposal because the Agency viewed the
submittal as a non-controversial SIP
amendment and anticipated no adverse
comments. Further, EPA explained that
the Agency was publishing a separate
document in the proposed rules section
of the Federal Register to serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should an adverse comment be filed.
EPA also noted that the rule would be
effective on August 28, 2017, without
further notice unless the Agency
received adverse comment by July 31,
2017. EPA explained that if the Agency
received such comments, then EPA
would publish a document withdrawing
the final rule and informing the public
that the rule would not take effect. It
was also explained that all public
comments received would then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule, and that
EPA would not institute a second
comment period on this action. The
public was advised that if no comments
were received that the rule would be
effective on August 28, 2017, with no
further actions on the proposed rule.
On July 31, 2017, EPA received one
set of adverse comments from a single
Commenter representing four individual
groups. As a result of the comments
received, EPA is withdrawing the direct
final rule approving changes to existing
minor source permitting exemptions
and a definition related to minor source
permitting exemptions into the Georgia
SIP. If EPA determines that it is
appropriate to finalize the proposed
approval of these changes to the Georgia
SIP, EPA will publish a final rule which
will include a response to the comments
received. In the event that EPA
determines that it is not appropriate to
finalize the proposed approval related to
these changes, EPA may issue a
subsequent proposal with a different
course of action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39671
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 10, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Accordingly, the amendments to 40
CFR 52.570(c) published on June 29,
2017 (82 FR 29418), which were to
become effective August 28, 2017, are
withdrawn.
■
[FR Doc. 2017–17617 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9966–64–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AT57
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry: Alternative Monitoring
Method
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published a
direct final rule in the Federal Register
on June 23, 2017 titled National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) From the Portland
Cement Manufacturing Industry:
Alternative Monitoring Method. This
final rule removes the provisions that
were added in the June 23, 2017, direct
final rule and restores the provisions
that were deleted in that rule.
DATES: Effective August 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243–04), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
1103; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Why is EPA taking this action?
On June 23, 2017, the EPA published
a direct final rule to amend the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry (Portland
Cement NESHAP) to allow an
alternative monitoring method to be
used to comply with hydrogen chloride
(HCl) emissions standards (82 FR
28562). We stated in that direct final
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39665-39671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17748]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0051]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Ice Covered Waterways in the Fifth Coast Guard
District
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing 11 safety zones on certain
navigable waters of the Fifth Coast Guard District. This action is
necessary to promote navigational safety, provide for the safety of
life and property, and facilitate the reasonable demands of commerce
where a threat to navigation exists due to ice covered waterways. This
rule is intended to mitigate the potential threat ice poses to the
maritime public in the Fifth Coast Guard District by implementing
control measures on vessels operating in certain ice covered waterways.
DATES: This rule is effective September 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0051 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Doug Simpson, Fifth Coast Guard District, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 757-398-6346, email douglas.c.simpson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
SNPRM Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On July 9, 2015, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Regulated Navigation Area; Ice Covered
Waterways in the Fifth Coast Guard District (80 FR 39403). The purpose
of that proposed regulated navigation area (RNA) was to mitigate the
aforementioned potential threat ice poses to the maritime public in the
Fifth Coast Guard District by implementing control measures on vessels
of certain characteristics. We invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to that RNA. During the comment period that
ended October 7, 2015, we received a total of six comments coming from
six submitters. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Based on consideration of the comments received in response to the
NPRM and further analysis, the Coast Guard proposed to establish 11
safety
[[Page 39666]]
zones on certain navigable waters of the Fifth Coast Guard District
instead of 1 RNA. On February 9, 2017, the Coast Guard published an
SNPRM titled Safety Zones; Ice Covered Waterways in the Fifth Coast
Guard District (82 FR 9978). There we stated why we issued the SNPRM,
replied to the comments received in response to the NPRM, and invited
comments on the proposed regulatory action. During the comment period
on the SNPRM that ended April 10, 2017, we received a total of 11
comments coming from four submitters. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Coast Guard has determined that during an average or severe
winter, the presence of ice in waterways presents numerous hazards to
vessels. Such hazards include vessels becoming beset or dragged off
course, sinking or grounding and creating hazards to navigation. The
presence of ice in a waterway may hamper a vessel's ability to maneuver
and impose additional loads on a vessel's hull, propulsion system and
appendages. Blockage of sea suctions can cause the main engine cooling
system to overheat, requiring reduced power to be used or the engine to
be shut down completely. Visual aids to navigation may become
submerged, destroyed, or moved off station, potentially misleading the
vessel operator to unsafe waters. Vessels operating in these hazardous
conditions could introduce a clear and present danger to the maritime
public and environment. The purpose of this rule is to mitigate the
potential threat ice poses to the maritime public in the Fifth Coast
Guard District by implementing control measures on vessels operating in
certain ice covered waterways.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received 11 comments from four submitters on our
SNPRM published February 9, 2017. One comment was generally supportive
of the rule.
In response to one comment, we changed the regulatory text that
defined the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway to clarify the safety
zone's northern boundaries. The safety zone's northern boundary uses
the Fifth Coast Guard District's boundary as defined in 33 CFR
80.501(b)-(c) and 80.502. We changed the rule to define a position for
the entrance to Manasquan Inlet. We also changed the rule to define the
southern boundary of the zone at Cape May Inlet, Cape May, NJ as it is
defined in 33 CFR 80.502 (g). We did not define the width of safety
zone in areas where the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway passes through
open water areas, as the commenter requested. However, we changed the
regulatory text to explicitly include the navigable waters Manasquan
River at its tributaries, Metedeconk River and its tributaries, Toms
River and Barnegat Bay and its tributaries, Mahahawkin Bay, Little Egg
Harbor, Great Bay to Absecon Bay, Lakes Bay, Great Egg Harbor Bay, Peck
Bay, Ludlam Bay, Townsend Sound, Stites Sound, Great Sound, Grassy
Sound, Taylor Sound, Sunset Lake, Jarvis Sound and Cape May Harbor. The
comment also requested we provide the horizontal Datum. We used NAD 83
and changed the regulatory text of each safety zone to incorporate that
reference.
Two comments requested that the Coast Guard provide positions for
the bridges that serve as boundaries for the Delaware River, Upper
Delaware River, Baltimore Harbor and approaches, Chesapeake Channel to
Cove Point, Chesapeake Channel between Cove Point and Smith Point, and
Lower Potomac River, Potomac River, and the Upper Potomac River and
Anacostia River zones. As a result, these positions were provided in
the regulatory text where practical. The Coast Guard determined the
positions by plotting the locations on National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) nautical charts for the following bridges: Betsy
Ross (state route 90) fixed highway bridge, Trenton--Morrisville (state
route 1) highway bridge, Governor Harry W. Nice (US-301) Memorial
Bridge, Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495) Bridge, the Francis Scott
Key (US-29) Bridge, and the John Philip Sousa (Pennsylvania Avenue SE)
Bridge. The William P. Lane, Jr (US-50/301) Memorial Bridge is curved,
and we find it impractical to sufficiently define this boundary using
latitude and longitude in this rule. Instead, the southern boundary of
the Baltimore Harbor and approaches safety zone and the northern
boundary of the Chesapeake Channel to Cove Point safety zone were
changed to the southernmost edge of the east-bound span of the of the
William P. Lane, Jr (US-50/301) Memorial Bridge.
One comment requested that we describe the end and turning points
of all the lines that run along the latitude parallel to another
location. We changed the regulatory text of the following safety zones:
Chesapeake Channel to Cove Point: Provided positions for the eastern
and western extent of the southern boundary; Chesapeake Channel between
Cove Point and Smith Point, and Lower Potomac: Provided positions for
the eastern and western extent of the northern boundary, and the
positions defining southern boundary across the Chesapeake Bay and
Tangier Sound; Upper Potomac River and Anacostia River: Provided
position for Hains Point; Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound: the
positions defining the eastern and western extent of the northern
boundary across the Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound and the eastern
and western extent of the southern boundary along latitude
37[deg]45'00.0'' N.
One comment proposed additional smaller zones, with the desire to
minimize restriction in portions of the zones that are not impacted by
ice. The Coast Guard does not agree with the addition of the proposed
zones because the operational complexity and feasibility of enacting
those zones is counter to public interest due to the significant amount
of time it would take to effectively manage compliance. However, to
address the comments, we changed the regulatory text in Sec.
165.550(d)(1) to allow each COTP to set ice conditions for any zone in
this rule, or a portion thereof. The COTP may choose not to activate an
entire zone if the ice prevalence and thickness is limited in such a
way it would be too burdensome to activate the entire zone.
The same commenter stated that there are no provisions for Maryland
Department of Natural Resources to request or obtain a waiver from the
COTP for icebreaking operations. We changed the rule's definition of
public vessels in response to this comment to mean vessels owned or
bareboat chartered and operated by the United States, or by a State or
political subdivision thereof, or by a foreign nation, except when such
vessel is engaged in commercial service. Because this definition
includes vessels engaged in law enforcement, we removed ``engaged in
law enforcement'' from paragraph (d)(1).
An anonymous comment asserted that the Coast Guard did not evaluate
the impact of a ``business as usual approach'' as an alternative to
this rule. We do not agree with this assertion because the existing
means by which the Coast Guard restricted vessel operations in ice
covered waterways was specifically addressed in the NPRM and SNPRM (82
FR 9978). As stated in the SNPRM, permanent safety zones are the most
appropriate from a regulatory perspective and will ensure consistency
throughout the Fifth Coast Guard District. Furthermore, as stated in
the SNPRM, the Coast Guard finds relying
[[Page 39667]]
solely on the authority provided by 33 CFR part 6 is not feasible when
ice presents hazardous conditions. Sole reliance on this authority
involving the protection and security of vessels, harbors, and
waterfront facilities would require the COTP to take individual action
against every vessel desiring to operate in the area, which is counter
to public interest due to the significant amount of time it would take
to issue and administer an effective amount of orders.
The same anonymous commenter stated that the Coast Guard did not
adequately address ``biophysical impacts,'' details of the ``obvious
cultural and social impacts'' to recreational activities on the water,
environmental justice, and economic impacts of alternatives to the
proposed rule. The comment was vague and lacked sufficient supporting
information needed to determine its validity. We were unable to obtain
clarification from this anonymous commenter regarding the various
issues mentioned, but the Coast Guard believes this rule remains as one
that is a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment, and the analysis
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. Similarly, one commenter stated that these
regulations would have an impact on persons who make a living by
fishing, crabbing, and oystering on the Chesapeake Bay that act as
small businesses. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small
Business Administration on this rulemaking, and the Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
One comment stated, ``Depending on which shoreline is being used
for measurement, a percentage value of coverage may vary considerably,
which will affect which areas are selected for closure. It is not known
which shoreline standard is being used . . .'' In the context of this
rule, the shoreline is the extent of navigable waters as they are
defined in 33 CFR part 2. We replaced the term shoreline with the term
``the extent of navigable waters'' to clarify the physical reference
point from which ice accumulation will be measured for the purposes of
enforcing the rule. The zones cover large geographic areas so that a
disproportionate amount of ice accumulation along a shoreline will not
have an impact on when the Ice Conditions are set. To clarify the
jurisdictional extents of the safety zones, the term ``and its
tributaries'' was added to Delaware Bay, Delaware River, and Upper
Delaware River zones.
The same commenter expressed concern that the measurement errors or
tolerance that would affect timings of ``closure events'' is unknown.
No changes were made to this rule based on this comment. The Coast
Guard finds it reasonable to expect that vessel operators can discern
between the ice prevalence and thicknesses that are listed in the
regulatory text in order to determine when restrictions are in place.
The Coast Guard has consistently received reliable and accurate reports
of ice conditions from these same vessel operators in the past.
Furthermore, as stated in the regulatory text, the COTP can notify
mariners of Ice Conditions and associated restrictions via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and other methods described in 33 CFR 165.7. Vessel
operators that encounter ice covered waterways and are uncertain if the
zone is in effect may contact the cognizant COTP to determine the
waterway status.
The same commenter asked for a list of ``protected waters'' and
their boundary coordinates. This rule defines ``protected waters'' as,
``sheltered waters such as harbors or basins that present no special
hazards.'' This term is used in this regulation so ``vessels may
transit within protected waters to facilitate icebreaking operations
and protect infrastructure and property without COTP permission.'' The
commenter specifically asked if contractors moving work barges around
bridges would be considered as operating in protected waters and if
fishermen attempting to recover nets or other fisheries gear would be
considered as protecting infrastructure or property. No changes were
made based on this comment. It is not feasible for the Coast Guard to
provide a list of activity in every area that could be considered
``protected waters'' in this rule because the conclusion would vary
depending on the vessel, environment, nature of the activity, and
infrastructure present at the time the Ice Condition is in effect. The
Coast Guard concludes that the present definition provides sufficient
parameters that will promote navigational safety, provide for the
safety of life and property, and facilitate the reasonable demands of
commerce.
Finally, one commenter requested the Coast Guard institute a
process whereby the final rule is subject to future review and comment
by industry stakeholders at regular intervals to ensure that it remains
appropriate to current conditions. The Coast Guard will monitor the
effectiveness when executing and enforcing the rule, and ensures that
our agency will engage in proper notice-and-comment procedures if we
see a need to change the rule.
This rule establishes 11 safety zones on the navigable waters of
the Fifth Coast Guard District. This imposes restrictions on vessels
operating within the safety zones or a portion of the zones where a
threat to navigation exists due to ice covered waterways. Vessels
transiting in protected waters, such as within a marina, harbor or
basin, for the purposes of facilitating icebreaking operations and
protecting infrastructure and property would be exempt from the
controls. Vessels capable of operating in the prevailing ice condition
outside of protected waters may be allowed to operate within the safety
zones if granted permission by the cognizant COTP.
Under this rule, a vessel needs permission from the cognizant COTP
or the District Commander to enter or continue transiting a zone if,
when approaching or after entering a safety zone, the vessel encounters
ice of a given thickness, unless the COTP or the District Commander has
set an ice condition for the zone or a portion of the zone and the
vessel meets the associated requirements to transit the zone.
Descriptions of the three ice conditions and vessel requirements to
transit are listed below. Under:
Condition One, when 30 percent of a zone is reported
covered with ice 1 to 3 inches thick, only steel hull vessels would be
allowed to transit the zone;
Condition Two, when 30 to 90 percent of a zone is reported
covered with ice 3 to 9 inches thick, only steel hull vessels with a
1,500 minimum shaft horsepower and a main engine cooling system design
that prevents blockage from ice would be allowed to transit the zone;
and
Condition Three, when 90 percent or more of a zone is
reported covered with ice 9 inches thick, only steel hull vessels with
a 1,500 minimum shaft horsepower and a main engine cooling system
design that prevents blockage from ice in a vessel convoy would be
allowed to transit the zone.
For non-steel-hull vessels, entry into or continuing to transit the
zone is prohibited without permission from the cognizant COTP or
District Commander if, when approaching the zone or after entering the
safety zone, the vessel encounters ice of \1/2\-inch or more in
thickness. When this thickness of ice is reached in a zone, non-steel
hull vessels moored or docked in the zone need not exit the zone, but
these vessels may not transit the zone without permission of the
cognizant COTP or District Commander. There is an exemption for vessels
that need to transit in protected
[[Page 39668]]
waters, such as within a marina, harbor, or basin, to facilitate
icebreaking operations and protect infrastructure and property. The
regulatory text appears at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This
rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance
it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on our assessment
that although this regulation could limit or prevent marine traffic
from transiting certain waterways in the Fifth Coast Guard District,
the effect of this regulation would not be significant because there is
little vessel traffic associated with recreational boating and
commercial fishing during enforcement periods. The Coast Guard
anticipates implementing control measures for limited durations of
time. The cognizant COTP will make notifications of the regulated areas
to the maritime public via Broadcast Notice to Mariners so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly. Moreover, vessel traffic capable of
operating in such conditions will be allowed to enter into or transit
within the safety zones as specified by the cognizant COTP.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated areas may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive
Order13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Act) (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves establishing safety zones. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting
this determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without
[[Page 39669]]
jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.550 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.550 Safety Zones; Ice covered waterways within the Fifth
Coast Guard District.
(a) Regulated areas. The following areas are established as safety
zones:
(1) Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay--COTP Zone. (i) Delaware Bay:
All navigable waters of Delaware Bay and Delaware River in an area
bound to the south by a line drawn across the entrance to Delaware Bay,
commencing at Cape May Light (LLNR 155) latitude 38[deg]55'59'' N.,
longitude 074[deg]57'37'' W.; thence southwest to Cape Henlopen,
latitude 38[deg]48'20.3'' N., longitude 075[deg]05'44.5'' W. The
regulated area is bound to the north by a line drawn across the
Delaware River, commencing at Liston Point, DE, latitude
39[deg]25'03.07'' N., longitude 075[deg]32'25.5'' W.; thence northeast
to the extent of navigable waters at Hope Creek Jetty, latitude
39[deg]27'05.04'' N., longitude 075[deg]30'12.55'' W. (Datum NAD 83)
(ii) Delaware River: All navigable waters of Delaware River and its
tributaries, in an area bound to the south by a line drawn across the
Delaware River, commencing at Liston Point, DE, latitude
39[deg]25'03.07'' N., longitude 075[deg]32'25.5'' W.; thence northeast
to the extent of navigable waters at Hope Creek Jetty, latitude
39[deg]27'05.04'' N., longitude 075[deg]30'12.55'' W., including the
navigable waters of the Salem River, Christina River, and Schuylkill
River. The regulated area is bound to the north by a line drawn across
the Delaware River at the Betsy Ross (state route 90) fixed highway
bridge from latitude 39[deg]59'10.43'' N, longitude 075[deg]04'11.03''
W to latitude 39[deg]58'58.65'' N., longitude 075[deg]03'43.23'' W.
(Datum NAD 83)
(iii) Upper Delaware River: All navigable waters of Delaware River
and its tributaries in an area bound to the south by a line drawn
across the Delaware River at the Betsy Ross (state route 90) fixed
highway bridge from latitude 39[deg]59'10.43'' N., longitude
075[deg]04'11.03'' W. to latitude 39[deg]58'58.65'' N., longitude
075[deg]03'43.23'' W. The regulated area is bound to the north by a
line drawn across the Delaware River at the Trenton--Morrisville (state
route 1) highway bridge from latitude 40[deg]12'29.86'' N., longitude
074[deg]46'11.00'' W. to latitude 40[deg]12'34.93'' N., longitude
74[deg]46'00.63'' W. (Datum NAD 83)
(iv) New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway: All navigable waters of New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NJICW), bounded by the area defined by 33
CFR 80.501(b)-(c) and Sec. 80.502, commencing at the entrance to
Manasquan Inlet at latitude 40[deg]06'03'' N., longitude 74[deg]01'55''
W., continuing the entire length of NJICW to include the navigable
waters Manasquan River at its tributaries, Metedeconk River and its
tributaries, Toms River and Barnegat Bay and its tributaries,
Mahahawkin Bay, Little Egg Harbor, Great Bay to Absecon Bay, Lakes Bay,
Great Egg Harbor Bay, Peck Bay, Ludlam Bay, Townsend Sound, Stites
Sound, Great Sound, Grassy Sound, Taylor Sound, Sunset Lake, Jarvis
Sound and Cape May Harbor. This regulated area terminates in the east
at line drawn across the seaward extremity of Cape May Inlet, Cape May,
NJ and in the west at line drawn across the entrance to the Cape May
Canal from latitude 38[deg]58'03.72'' N., longitude 074[deg]58'00.00''
W. to latitude 38[deg]57'57.00'' N., longitude 074[deg]58'00.80'' W.
(Datum NAD 83)
(2) Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region- COTP Zone.
(i) Head of Chesapeake Bay to C&D Canal: All navigable waters of the
Upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, bound to the north by a line
drawn from Hylands Point, MD, latitude 39[deg]30'18'' N., longitude
075[deg]55'37'' W.; thence east across Elk River to the shoreline at
Old Town Point Wharf, MD, latitude 39[deg]30'11.3'' N., longitude
075[deg]54'57.1'' W. The regulated area is bound to the south by a line
drawn across the Chesapeake Bay, commencing at North Point, MD,
latitude 39[deg]11'43.7'' N., longitude 076[deg]26'32.8'' W.; thence
east to the extent of navigable waters at Swan Point, latitude
39[deg]08'41.7'' N., longitude 076[deg]16'42.4'' W. (Datum NAD 83)
(ii) Baltimore Harbor and approaches: All navigable waters of the
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, bound to the north by a line drawn
across the Chesapeake Bay, commencing at North Point, MD, latitude
39[deg]11'43.7'' N., longitude 076[deg]26'32.8'' W.; thence east to the
shoreline at Swan Point, latitude 39[deg]08'41.7'' N., longitude
076[deg]16'42.4'' W. The regulated area is bound to the south by the
southernmost edge of the east-bound span of the William P. Lane, Jr
(US-50/301) Memorial Bridge. (Datum NAD 83)
(iii) Chesapeake Channel to Cove Point: All navigable waters of the
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, bound to the north by the
southernmost edge of the east-bound span of the William P. Lane, Jr
(US-50/301) Memorial Bridge. The regulated area is bound to the south
by a line drawn across the Chesapeake Bay commencing in Cove Point in
Calvert County, MD at latitude 38[deg]23'10.5'' N., longitude
076[deg]22'52.9''W. and ending at a point in Meekins Neck at latitude
38[deg]23'14.9'' N., longitude 076[deg]16'48.3'' W. (Datum NAD 83)
(iv) Chesapeake Channel between Cove Point and Smith Point, and
Lower Potomac River: All navigable waters of Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries, bound to the north by a line drawn across the Chesapeake
Bay commencing in Cove Point in Calvert County, MD at latitude
38[deg]23'10.5'' N., longitude 076[deg]22'52.9'' W. and ending at a
point in Meekins Neck at latitude 38[deg]23'10.5'' N., longitude
076[deg]16'48.3'' W.; and all navigable waters of the Potomac River
bound to the north by a line drawn across the Potomac River at the
Governor Harry W. Nice (US-301) Memorial Bridge from latitude
38[deg]21'33.30'' N., longitude 077[deg]00'51.41''W. to latitude
38[deg]21'48.22'' N., longitude 76[deg]58'59.83'' W., connecting King
George County, VA and Charles County, MD. (Datum NAD 83)
(v) Potomac River: All navigable waters of the Potomac River, bound
to the north by a line drawn across the Potomac River at the Woodrow
Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495) Bridge from latitude 38[deg]47'32.38'' N.,
longitude 077[deg]02'22.15'' W. to latitude 38[deg]47'33.83'' N.,
longitude 077[deg]01'30.58'' W., connecting Alexandria, VA and Prince
George's County, MD. The regulated area is bound to the south by a line
drawn across the Potomac River at the Governor Harry W. Nice (US-301)
Memorial Bridge from latitude 38[deg]21'33.30'' N., longitude
077[deg]00'51.41''W. to latitude 38[deg]21'48.22'' N., longitude
76[deg]58'59.83'' W., connecting King George County, VA and Charles
County, MD. (Datum NAD 83)
(vi) Upper Potomac River and Anacostia River: All navigable waters
of the Potomac River, bound to the north by a line drawn across the
Potomac River at the Francis Scott Key (US-29) Bridge from latitude
38[deg]54'03.51'' N.,
[[Page 39670]]
longitude 077[deg]04'13.18'' W. to latitude 38[deg]54'13.68'' N.,
longitude 077[deg]04'08.46'' W., connecting Rosslyn, VA and Georgetown,
Washington, DC, and bound to the south by a line drawn across the
Potomac River at the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95/I-495) Bridge from
latitude 38[deg]47'32.38'' N., longitude 077[deg]02'22.15'' W. to
latitude 38[deg]47'33.83'' N., longitude 077[deg]01'30.58'' W.,
connecting Alexandria, VA and Prince George's County, MD. All navigable
waters of Anacostia River and Washington Channel bound to the north by
a line drawn across the Anacostia River at the John Philip Sousa
(Pennsylvania Avenue SE) Bridge, latitude 38[deg]52'38.97'' N.,
longitude 076[deg]58'46.48'' W. to latitude 38[deg]52'34.08'' N.,
longitude 076[deg]58'36.61'' W. and bound to the south by a line drawn
across the mouth of the Anacostia River, from Hains Point at latitude
38[deg] 51' 24.34'' N., longitude 077[deg] 1' 20.14'' W., south across
Anacostia River Channel to Giesboro Point at latitude 38[deg]50'51''
N., longitude 077[deg]01'14'' W. at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling
military installation. (Datum NAD 83)
(3) Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads--COTP Zone--(i) Chesapeake Bay
and Tangier Sound: All navigable waters of Chesapeake Bay, and its
tributaries, bound to the north by a line drawn along the Maryland-
Virginia boundary, commencing in Virginia at latitude 37[deg]53'11''
N., longitude 76[deg]14'15'' W., thence east along the Maryland-
Virginia boundary as it proceeds across the Chesapeake Bay and Pocomoke
River, ending at the point latitude 37[deg]59'39.8'' N., longitude
75[deg]37'27.4'' W. The regulated area is bound to the south by a line
drawn across the Chesapeake Bay along latitude 37[deg]45'00.0'' N.,
commencing in Northumberland County, VA at latitude 37[deg]45'00.00''
N., longitude 76[deg]18'44.32'' W. and ending in Chesconessex, in
Accomack County, VA at latitude 37[deg]45'00.00'' N., longitude
75[deg]48'39.53''W. (Datum NAD 83)
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
Convoy means a group of vessels led by U.S. Coast Guard assets or
COTP-designated vessels to assist vessels moving through the ice.
COTP means the Coast Guard Captain of the Port with jurisdiction
over the geographic area as defined in 33 CFR subpart 3.25.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the cognizant COTP
to assist in enforcing the safety zones described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
Horsepower means the total maximum continuous shaft horsepower of a
vessel's main propulsion machinery.
Ice Condition One means when the COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 30 percent of a safety zone defined
in paragraph (a) has been covered with ice whose thickness is
approximately 1 to 3 inches.
Ice Condition Two means when the COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 30 percent to 90 percent of a
safety zone defined in paragraph (a) has been covered with ice whose
thickness is approximately 3 to 9 inches.
Ice Condition Three means when the COTP or District Commander has
received reports that approximately 90 percent or more of a safety zone
defined in paragraph (a) has been covered with ice whose thickness is 9
inches or thicker.
Protected waters means sheltered waters such as harbors or basins
that present no special hazards.
Public vessel means vessels owned or bareboat chartered and
operated by the United States, or by a State or political subdivision
thereof, or by a foreign nation, except when such vessel is engaged in
commercial service.
(c) Regulations--(1) Non-steel hull vessels. Non-steel hull vessels
may not enter or transit within a safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section without permission from the cognizant COTP or
District Commander if, when approaching the zone or after entering the
zone, the vessel encounters ice of \1/2\-inch or more in thickness.
When ice in a zone is \1/2\-inch thick or more, non-steel hull vessels
moored or docked in the zone need not exit the zone. Except for as
described in paragraph (d)(4), non-steel hull vessels may not enter or
transit the zone without permission of the cognizant COTP or District
Commander.
(2) Steel hull vessels. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, steel hull vessels may not enter or transit within a
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section without
permission from the cognizant COTP or District Commander in the
following circumstances:
(i) The vessel has less than 1,500 minimum shaft horsepower and
encounters ice 1 inch or more thick.
(ii) The vessel has a 1,500 minimum shaft horsepower and a main
engine cooling system design that prevents blockage from ice and
encounters ice 3 inches or more thick.
(iii) The vessel is part of a vessel convoy and has a 1,500 minimum
shaft horsepower and a main engine cooling system design that prevents
blockage from ice and encounters ice 9 inches or more thick.
(d) Permission to enter or transit. (1) The COTP may set ice
conditions, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, for any zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section, or a portion thereof, and
announce those conditions via Broadcast Notice to Mariners and other
methods described in 33 CFR 165.7. Steel hull vessels prohibited from
entering or transiting a safety zone under paragraph (c) of this
section may nonetheless enter or continue transiting the safety zone
without contacting the COTP if the vessel is a public vessel or the
COTP has set an ice condition for the safety zone and the vessel meets
these restrictions:
(i) Ice Condition One. Only steel hull vessels may enter, operate
in, or transit though a safety zone when Ice Condition One has been set
for that zone.
(ii) Ice Condition Two. Only steel hull vessels with a 1,500
minimum shaft horsepower and a main engine cooling system design that
prevents blockage from ice, may enter, operate in, or transit though a
safety zone when Ice Condition Two has been set for that zone.
(iii) Ice Condition Three. Only steel hull vessels with a 1,500
minimum shaft horsepower and a main engine cooling system design that
prevents blockage from ice, and that are part of a vessel convoy, may
enter, operate in, or transit though a safety zone when Ice Condition
Three has been set for that zone. These vessels may only transit an Ice
Condition Three zone during daylight hours.
(2) Vessels prohibited from entering or transiting a safety zone
under paragraph (c) of this section may request permission to enter or
continue transiting by contacting the cognizant COTP on VHF-FM channel
16 (156.8 MHZ) or via telephone, as follows:
(i) COTP Delaware Bay: 215-271-4940.
(ii) COTP Maryland-National Capital Region: 410-576-2693.
(iii) COTP Hampton Roads: 757-483-8567.
(3) Vessels granted permission to enter, operate in, or transit
though a safety zone must do so in accordance with the directions
provided by the cognizant COTP or designated representative.
(4) Vessels may transit within protected waters to facilitate
icebreaking
[[Page 39671]]
operations and protect infrastructure and property without COTP
permission.
(e) Enforcement. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can
be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHZ). The
cognizant COTP and his or her designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number listed in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Meredith L. Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-17748 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P