National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method, 39671-39673 [2017-17624]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
operations and protect infrastructure
and property without COTP permission.
(e) Enforcement. The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHZ). The
cognizant COTP and his or her
designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number listed in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Meredith L. Austin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017–17748 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113; FRL–9966–66–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit
Exemptions and Definitions;
Withdrawal
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule: withdrawal.
AGENCY:
Due to adverse comments
received, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the June
29, 2017, direct final rule that would
have approved a revision to the Georgia
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
concerning changes to existing minor
source permitting exemptions and a
definition related to minor source
permitting exemptions. EPA stated in
the direct final rule that if EPA received
adverse comments by July 31, 2017, the
rule would be withdrawn and not take
effect.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
82 FR 29418 on June 29, 2017, is
withdrawn, effective August 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Phone
number: (404) 562–9089; Email:
akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
29, 2017 (82 FR 29418), EPA published
a direct final rulemaking to approve
portions of a SIP revision submitted by
the State of Georgia, through the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources’
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD), on September 19, 2006, with a
clarification submitted on November 6,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
2006. The SIP submission included
changes to existing minor source
permitting exemptions and a definition
related to minor source permitting
exemptions. On June 29, 2017 (82 FR
29469), EPA also published an
accompanying rulemaking proposing to
approve the portions of the
aforementioned SIP revision in the
event that EPA received adverse
comments on the direct final
rulemaking.
In the direct final rulemaking, EPA
explained that the Agency was
publishing the rule without prior
proposal because the Agency viewed the
submittal as a non-controversial SIP
amendment and anticipated no adverse
comments. Further, EPA explained that
the Agency was publishing a separate
document in the proposed rules section
of the Federal Register to serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should an adverse comment be filed.
EPA also noted that the rule would be
effective on August 28, 2017, without
further notice unless the Agency
received adverse comment by July 31,
2017. EPA explained that if the Agency
received such comments, then EPA
would publish a document withdrawing
the final rule and informing the public
that the rule would not take effect. It
was also explained that all public
comments received would then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule, and that
EPA would not institute a second
comment period on this action. The
public was advised that if no comments
were received that the rule would be
effective on August 28, 2017, with no
further actions on the proposed rule.
On July 31, 2017, EPA received one
set of adverse comments from a single
Commenter representing four individual
groups. As a result of the comments
received, EPA is withdrawing the direct
final rule approving changes to existing
minor source permitting exemptions
and a definition related to minor source
permitting exemptions into the Georgia
SIP. If EPA determines that it is
appropriate to finalize the proposed
approval of these changes to the Georgia
SIP, EPA will publish a final rule which
will include a response to the comments
received. In the event that EPA
determines that it is not appropriate to
finalize the proposed approval related to
these changes, EPA may issue a
subsequent proposal with a different
course of action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39671
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 10, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Accordingly, the amendments to 40
CFR 52.570(c) published on June 29,
2017 (82 FR 29418), which were to
become effective August 28, 2017, are
withdrawn.
■
[FR Doc. 2017–17617 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9966–64–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AT57
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry: Alternative Monitoring
Method
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published a
direct final rule in the Federal Register
on June 23, 2017 titled National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) From the Portland
Cement Manufacturing Industry:
Alternative Monitoring Method. This
final rule removes the provisions that
were added in the June 23, 2017, direct
final rule and restores the provisions
that were deleted in that rule.
DATES: Effective August 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243–04), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
1103; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Why is EPA taking this action?
On June 23, 2017, the EPA published
a direct final rule to amend the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry (Portland
Cement NESHAP) to allow an
alternative monitoring method to be
used to comply with hydrogen chloride
(HCl) emissions standards (82 FR
28562). We stated in that direct final
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
39672
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
rule that if we received adverse
comment by July 3, 2017, the direct
final rule would not take effect and we
would publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register. At the same time,
we published a parallel proposal, which
proposed to make the same changes that
were made in the direct final
rulemaking (82 FR 28616). We
subsequently received adverse comment
on the direct final rule and the parallel
proposal, but were unable to withdraw
the direct final rule in a timely manner.
In this document, we are taking final
action to remove the provisions that
were added to the Portland Cement
NESHAP in the direct final rule and
restoring the provisions that were
deleted in that rule. This action will,
thus, undo the changes made by the
direct final rule. We are concurrently
publishing a rule re-proposing and
providing additional opportunity for
public comment on the same
amendment for the Portland Cement
NESHAP that was proposed on June 23,
2017.
Although the EPA did provide an
opportunity for public comment on the
parallel proposal, the EPA also finds
that there is ‘‘good cause’’ under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) to make the
amendments discussed in this final rule
without prior notice and comment. For
this rule, notice and comment is
unnecessary because it simply
implements an action that the EPA
indicated it would take if it received
adverse comment on the direct final
rule. The record for the provisions being
restored is the same record that
supported those provisions in the first
instance and that was previously subject
to notice and comment. These actions
are effective as of August 22, 2017.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulation (40
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
CFR part 63, subpart LLL) and has
assigned OMB control number 2060–
0416. This action does not change the
information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA.
The RFA applies only to rules subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C.
553, or any other statute. The rule is not
subject to notice and comment
requirements because the agency has
invoked the APA ‘‘good cause’’
exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. It will neither impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
federally recognized tribal governments,
nor preempt tribal law. The EPA is
aware of one tribally owned Portland
cement facility currently subject to 40
CFR part 63, subpart LLL that will be
subject to this final rule. However, the
provisions of this final rule are not
expected to impose new or substantial
direct compliance costs on tribal
governments since the provisions in this
direct final rule are extending the use of
an alternative to the HCl monitoring
provisions, including an option which
provides operational flexibility. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that the EPA has
reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations, and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency is amending title 40, chapter I,
part 63 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) as follows:
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart LLL—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
From the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H) to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.1349 Performance testing
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) * * *
(H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section
expires on July 25, 2017 at which time
the owner or operator must demonstrate
compliance with paragraphs (b)(6)(i),
(ii), or (iii).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 63.1350 is amended by
revising paragraph (l)(4) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.1350
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(4) If you monitor continuous
performance through the use of an HCl
CPMS according to paragraphs
(b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of § 63.1349, for
any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating
day HCl CPMS average value from the
established operating limit, you must:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–17624 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
Congressional Review Act
The Commission sent a copy of
document FCC 17–86 to Congress and
the Government Accountability Office
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03–123; FCC
17–86]
Structure and Practices of the Video
Relay Services Program
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission adopts a four-year rate plan
to compensate video relay service (VRS)
providers, amends its rules to permitserver based routing for VRS and pointto-point calls, authorizes the continued
use of money from the
Telecommunications Relay Service
(TRS) Fund for Commission-supervised
research and development, eliminates
rules providing for a neutral video
communications service platform, and
reinstates the effectiveness of the rule
incorporating the VRS Interoperability
Profile technical standard.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
Effective September 21, 2017.
The compliance date for 47 CFR
64.621(b)(1) is December 20, 2017. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publication listed in the rules was
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of May 30, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
Aldrich, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at: (202) 418–0996, email
Robert.Aldrich@fcc.gov, or Eliot
Greenwald, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at: (202)
418–2235, email Eliot.Greenwald@
fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order and Order, FCC 17–86,
adopted and released on July 6, 2017, in
CG Docket Nos. 10–51 and 03–123. The
full text of this document will be
available for public inspection and
copying via the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), and during regular business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or call the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (844) 432–2272
(videophone), or (202) 418–0432 (TTY).
DATES:
Final Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
Document FCC 17–86 does not
contain any new or modified
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any new
or modified information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to
the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
VRS Compensation—Allowable Cost
Categories
1. In the Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FNPRM), FCC 17–26,
published at 82 FR 17613, April 12,
2017, the Commission stated its
intention not to reopen questions
concerning the categories of expenses
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39673
that should be considered allowable
costs for VRS compensation. Various
parties commenting in this proceeding
nonetheless urge that the Commission
re-open the matter of allowing costs
associated with customer premise
equipment (CPE), numbering, outreach,
and research and development (R&D). In
addition, Sorenson Communications,
LLC (Sorenson) raises new concerns
about allowing compensation for
imputed intellectual property. These
issues are beyond the scope of the
rulemaking. The Commission has
previously considered and disallowed
compensation for each of these
categories, except intellectual property,
which is addressed below.
2. No reason to reopen previously
settled disallowance issues. No party
provides a compelling reason to reopen
the above issues in this proceeding,
especially in the absence of
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
notice. The Commission does not agree
that circumstances have changed
dramatically and sees no material
difference from prior proceedings where
these issues were addressed.
3. Even if the issues were not already
settled and there was APA notice
regarding them, the Commission would
not be persuaded by arguments to
expand allowable costs. Equalizing all
VRS-related costs to a voice telephone
user’s costs is not part of the
Commission’s mandate under section
225 of the Act. Congressional intent to
equalize either network access rates or
equipment costs for TRS and voice
service users is not evident in the text
of this narrowly drawn provision, its
surrounding context, or its legislative
history. In 1990, the year of section
225’s enactment, all TRS calls took
place between individuals who used
TTYs and voice users. But the high costs
of TTY service rates and equipment
were matters of public awareness and
were being addressed through state and
federal action outside the relay
requirements of section 225 of the Act.
Regarding service costs, the plain text of
this section demonstrates that it solely
was intended to prevent relay users
from incurring the added costs of
routing TRS calls through remote relay
centers that lie outside the geographical
locations of the parties to a relay call,
and nothing more. Congress had
knowledge about, and ample
opportunity to direct the Commission to
equalize telephone service costs for TTY
users at the time of section 225’s
enactment, yet it specifically chose not
to do so. Accordingly, the discrepancy
between the higher service costs for a
broadband connection needed to
achieve access to VRS and the costs of
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39671-39673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0442; FRL-9966-64-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT57
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a
direct final rule in the Federal Register on June 23, 2017 titled
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) From
the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring
Method. This final rule removes the provisions that were added in the
June 23, 2017, direct final rule and restores the provisions that were
deleted in that rule.
DATES: Effective August 22, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax
number: (919) 541-5450; and email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA taking this action?
On June 23, 2017, the EPA published a direct final rule to amend
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry (Portland Cement NESHAP) to
allow an alternative monitoring method to be used to comply with
hydrogen chloride (HCl) emissions standards (82 FR 28562). We stated in
that direct final
[[Page 39672]]
rule that if we received adverse comment by July 3, 2017, the direct
final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register. At the same time, we published a
parallel proposal, which proposed to make the same changes that were
made in the direct final rulemaking (82 FR 28616). We subsequently
received adverse comment on the direct final rule and the parallel
proposal, but were unable to withdraw the direct final rule in a timely
manner. In this document, we are taking final action to remove the
provisions that were added to the Portland Cement NESHAP in the direct
final rule and restoring the provisions that were deleted in that rule.
This action will, thus, undo the changes made by the direct final rule.
We are concurrently publishing a rule re-proposing and providing
additional opportunity for public comment on the same amendment for the
Portland Cement NESHAP that was proposed on June 23, 2017.
Although the EPA did provide an opportunity for public comment on
the parallel proposal, the EPA also finds that there is ``good cause''
under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) to
make the amendments discussed in this final rule without prior notice
and comment. For this rule, notice and comment is unnecessary because
it simply implements an action that the EPA indicated it would take if
it received adverse comment on the direct final rule. The record for
the provisions being restored is the same record that supported those
provisions in the first instance and that was previously subject to
notice and comment. These actions are effective as of August 22, 2017.
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR part 63,
subpart LLL) and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0416. This action
does not change the information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to
rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. The rule is not subject to
notice and comment requirements because the agency has invoked the APA
``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will neither impose substantial direct
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor
preempt tribal law. The EPA is aware of one tribally owned Portland
cement facility currently subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL that
will be subject to this final rule. However, the provisions of this
final rule are not expected to impose new or substantial direct
compliance costs on tribal governments since the provisions in this
direct final rule are extending the use of an alternative to the HCl
monitoring provisions, including an option which provides operational
flexibility. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of protection provided to human
health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency is amending title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) as follows:
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 39673]]
Subpart LLL--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
0
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H) to read
as follows:
Sec. 63.1349 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) * * *
(H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section expires on July 25, 2017 at
which time the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with
paragraphs (b)(6)(i), (ii), or (iii).
* * * * *
0
3. Section 63.1350 is amended by revising paragraph (l)(4) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1350 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(4) If you monitor continuous performance through the use of an HCl
CPMS according to paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of Sec. 63.1349,
for any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating day HCl CPMS average value
from the established operating limit, you must:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-17624 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P