Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area; American Fisheries Act; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program, 39743-39748 [2017-17607]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
For this rule, NMFS also reviewed the
criteria at § 635.27(b)(3) to determine
when opening each fishery would
provide equitable opportunities for
fishermen, to the extent practicable,
while also considering the ecological
needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s)
could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and
number of fishing participants during
the year. For the 2018 fishing season,
NMFS is proposing to open all of the
shark management groups on the
effective date of the final rule for this
action (expected to be on or about
January 1). The direct and indirect
economic impacts would be neutral on
a short- and long-term basis because
NMFS is not proposing to change the
opening dates of these fisheries from the
status quo.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
Dated: August 15, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–17575 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 679 and 680
[Docket No. 170412391–7391–01]
RIN 0648–BG84
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area;
American Fisheries Act; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Crab
Rationalization Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues a proposed rule
to implement Amendment 48 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Bering
Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner
Crabs (Crab FMP) and a regulatory
amendment to revise regulations
implementing the American Fisheries
Act (AFA) Program and the Crab
Rationalization (CR) Program. This
proposed rule would revise how NMFS
determines the amount of limited access
privileges held and used by groups in
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
the Western Alaska Community
Development Quota Program (CDQ
Program) for the purposes of managing
the excessive share limits under the
AFA Program and the CR Program. This
proposed rule is necessary to align
regulations and the Crab FMP to be
consistent with an amendment to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and NMFS’
current method of managing excessive
share limits for CDQ groups in the AFA
Program and the CR Program. This
proposed rule is intended to promote
the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Crab FMP,
and other applicable law.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number NOAA–
NMFS–2017–0038, by either of the
following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2017-0038, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address), confidential
business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 48 to
the Crab FMP, the Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), and the Categorical
Exclusion prepared for this proposed
action are available from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://alaska
fisheries.noaa.gov.
The CR Program Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), RIR, and Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, as well
as the AFA Program EIS and RIR, are
available from the NMFS Alaska Region
Web site at https://alaska
fisheries.noaa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39743
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keeley Kent, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the pollock fisheries
in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
off Alaska under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (BSAI FMP). NMFS
manages the king and Tanner crab
fisheries in the U.S. EEZ of the Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) under
the Crab FMP. The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
prepared, and NMFS approved, the
BSAI FMP and the Crab FMP under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations
governing and implementing the BSAI
FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and
679. Regulations governing and
implementing the Crab FMP appear at
50 CFR parts 600 and 680.
A notice of availability for
Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP was
published in the Federal Register on
August 3, 2017. Comment on
Amendment 48 is invited through
October 2, 2017. All relevant written
comments received by the end of the
comment period, whether specifically
directed to the FMP amendment, this
proposed rule, or both, will be
considered in the approval/disapproval
decision for Amendment 48 and
addressed in the response to comments
in the final rule.
Background
This proposed rule would modify
regulations that specify how NMFS
determines holding and use of limited
access privileges (LAPs) for the
purposes of managing excessive share
limits for CDQ groups under the AFA
Program and the CR Program. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS
to establish excessive share limits to
prevent excessive consolidation of
harvesting and processing LAPs in order
to maintain an appropriate distribution
of economic and social benefits for
fishery participants and communities.
NMFS has adopted regulations under its
LAP programs to ensure that no person
holds or uses more LAPs than
authorized under excessive share limits
established for each LAP program.
Section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act describes the Western Alaska
Community Development Quota
Program (CDQ Program) (16 U.S.C.
1855(i)). Regulations at 50 CFR 679.2
define the term ‘‘CDQ group’’ as an
entity identified as eligible for the CDQ
Program under 16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(D).
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
39744
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule would revise the
regulations that prescribe the
calculation of excessive share limits for
CDQ groups for two LAP programs: The
AFA Program and the CR Program. CDQ
groups participate in LAP programs,
including the AFA and the CR Program,
by purchasing harvesting and
processing privileges and through
ownership of vessels and processors
that participate in these fisheries. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act was amended by
the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2006 (Pub. L.
109–241; the Coast Guard Act) to
specify the method that NMFS must use
for monitoring excessive share limits as
they apply to CDQ groups—the
proportional or ‘‘individual and
collective’’ rule. Section 305(i)(1)(F)(i)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as
amended by the Coast Guard Act,
provides that CDQ groups shall be
subject to any excessive share
ownership, harvesting, or processing
limitations in the fisheries of the Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Management
Area only to the extent of the CDQ
group’s proportional ownership (16
U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(F)(i)).
NMFS has implemented in practice
the method specified in the 2006
amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens
Act for CDQ groups to monitor
excessive share limits in the AFA
Program and the CR Program; however,
the regulations for the AFA Program and
the CR Program and the Crab FMP have
not been revised to be consistent with
the 2006 amendment to the MagnusonStevens Act.
The following sections describe (1)
excessive share limits, which are also
called holding and use caps, (2) AFA
Program use caps, (3) CR Program
holding and use caps, (4) CDQ Program
holding and use caps, and (5) this
proposed rule and the anticipated
effects of the action.
Excessive Share Limits
Section 301(a)(4) of the MagnusonStevens Act specifies that if
conservation and management measures
allocate or assign fishing privileges, the
measures must be carried out so that no
particular individual, corporation, or
other entity acquires an excessive share
of such privileges (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4)).
Section 303A(c)(5)(D) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires regional fishery
management councils to establish
excessive share limits for LAP programs
to prevent excessive accumulation of
privileges by participants in the LAP
programs (16 U.S.C. 1853a(c)(5)(D)). The
intent of these limits or caps is to
prevent excessive consolidation in the
harvesting and processing sectors in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
order to maintain an appropriate
distribution of economic and social
benefits for fishery participants and
communities. Because determination of
excessive shares must consider the
specific circumstances of each fishery,
the Council has implemented different
excessive share limits in the LAP
programs in Alaska’s fisheries,
including the AFA and CR Programs.
NMFS implemented use caps for the
AFA Program in 2002 (67 FR 79692;
December 30, 2002) and holding and
use caps for the CR Program in 2005 (70
FR 10174; March 2, 2005). The
regulations prohibit a person from using
more than the harvesting and processing
limits established in the AFA Program
and from holding and using more than
a specific portion of the LAPs allocated
under the CR Program. Under 50 CFR
679.2, ‘‘person’’ includes individuals,
corporations, partnerships, associations,
and other non-individual entities. To
monitor holdings and use of LAPs,
NMFS determines what portion of a
program’s harvesting and processing
privileges a person holds and uses to
ensure that no person holds or uses
more privileges than authorized by the
applicable excessive share cap.
NMFS determines a person’s holding
and use of a LAP in the AFA Program
and CR Program by summing (1) the
amount directly held and used by that
person, and (2) the amount held and
used by that person indirectly through
an ownership interest in or control of
another entity that also holds and uses
the LAP. Businesses that hold and use
LAPs in the AFA Program and the CR
Program are often composed of multiple
owners that have ownership interests in
multiple fishing businesses. In cases
where a LAP is held by a business entity
with more than one owner, NMFS
applies the holding and use caps to each
entity that holds or controls the LAP to
monitor whether those entities each
exceed the established caps. Ownership
attribution refers to the method NMFS
uses to assess the relationships between
different entities that participate in LAP
programs.
NMFS uses two ownership attribution
methods to determine holdings and use
of LAPs. These two methods for
attributing ownership and use of a LAP
are commonly known as the ‘‘individual
and collective rule’’ and the ‘‘10-percent
rule.’’ Under the individual and
collective rule, NMFS attributes holding
and use of LAPs by one person
proportionally to their ownership in or
control of another entity that holds and
uses LAPs. For example, if Company A
has a 15 percent ownership of Company
B that holds LAPs, Company A would
be attributed 15 percent of Company B’s
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
holding and use of the LAPs. In
contrast, under the 10-percent rule, a
person is attributed 100 percent of an
entity’s LAPs if that person owns or
otherwise controls ten percent or more
of that entity. Thus, if Company A holds
or controls 10 percent or more of
Company B, then 100 percent of
Company B’s holdings and use of LAPs
are attributed to Company A. When a
person owns or controls 10 percent or
more of another entity, the individual
and collective rule is less restrictive
than the 10-percent rule because a
person is only attributed holding and
use in proportion to how much that
person owns or controls of other
entities, rather than attributing 100
percent of the other entity’s LAP
holdings once the 10-percent ownership
or control threshold is met. Thus, under
a holding and use cap, the individual
and collective rule would allow a
person to hold and use more LAPs than
if the person was evaluated using the
10-percent rule.
AFA Program Use Caps
Congress passed the AFA in October
1998 to implement additional U.S.
ownership requirements for vessels
harvesting fish from the EEZ. The
purpose of the AFA was to tighten U.S.
ownership standards that had been
exploited under the Commercial Fishing
Industry Vessel Anti-Reflagging Act of
1987 (Pub. L. 100–239) and to provide
the BSAI pollock fleet the opportunity
to conduct their fishery in a more
rational manner (i.e., stopping the race
for fish) while protecting non-AFA
participants in the other fisheries. The
AFA established sector allocations in
the BSAI pollock fishery, determined
eligible vessels and processors, allowed
for the formation of cooperatives, set
limits on the participation of AFA
vessels in other fisheries, and imposed
special catch weighing and monitoring
requirements on AFA vessels. The AFA
also divided the available BSAI pollock
directed fishing allowance among three
harvesting sectors, after CDQ allocations
and an amount for incidental catch of
pollock by non-AFA vessels were
deducted.
Section 210(e) of the AFA set out
excessive harvesting and processing
limits for participants. Section 210(e)(1)
of the AFA restricts an individual,
corporation, or other entity to harvesting
no more than 17.5 percent of the pollock
available to be harvested in the directed
pollock fishery. This limit is codified at
50 CFR 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). Every year,
this limit is published in the annual
harvest specifications (82 FR 11826;
February 27, 2017).
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 210(e)(2) of the AFA directed
the Council to create management
measures to prevent any particular
individual or entity from processing an
excessive share of pollock available in
the directed pollock fishery. The
Council and NMFS set this limit at 30
percent of the sum of the directed
fishing allowances for pollock. This
limit is codified at 50 CFR
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). Every year, this
limit is published in the annual harvest
specifications (82 FR 11826; February
27, 2017).
Section 210(e)(3) of the AFA also
specified that any entity in which 10
percent or more of the interest is held
or controlled by another individual or
entity shall be considered to be the same
entity as the other individual or entity
for purposes of monitoring the
harvesting and processing use caps.
This section of the AFA directed NMFS
to use the 10-percent rule to determine
the use of AFA Program harvesting and
processing privileges. NMFS
implemented this AFA requirement in
part by defining an ‘‘AFA entity’’ at 50
CFR 679.2 as a group of affiliated
individuals, corporations, or other
business concerns that harvest or
process pollock in the Bering Sea
directed pollock fishery. The proposed
rule to implement the AFA Program
stated that the concept of ‘‘affiliation’’ is
central to the definition of ‘‘AFA entity’’
(66 FR 65028, 65049; December 17,
2001). As the December 2001 proposed
rule explained, ‘‘affiliation’’ means a
relationship between two or more
individuals, corporations, or other
business concerns in which one concern
directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent
or greater interest in the other, exerts 10
percent or greater control over the other,
or has the power to exert 10 percent or
greater control over the other; or a third
individual, corporation, or other
business concern directly or indirectly
owns a 10 percent or greater interest in
both, exerts 10 percent or greater control
over both, or has the power to exert 10
percent or greater control over both (see
regulations at § 679.2 for the definition
of ‘‘affiliation’’ and Section 2.6.3 of the
RIR for more information).
CR Program Use Caps
The CR Program was implemented on
April 1, 2005 (70 FR 10174; March 2,
2005). The CR Program established a
LAP program for nine crab fisheries in
the BSAI and assigned quota share (QS)
to persons based on their historic
participation in one or more of those
nine BSAI crab fisheries during a
specific period. Each year, a person who
holds QS may receive an exclusive
harvest privilege for a portion of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
annual total allowable catch (TAC). This
annual exclusive harvest privilege is
called individual fishing quota (IFQ).
NMFS also issued processor quota
share (PQS) under the CR Program. Each
year, PQS yields an exclusive privilege
to process a portion of the IFQ in each
of the nine BSAI crab fisheries. This
annual exclusive processing privilege is
called individual processor quota (IPQ).
Only a portion of the QS issued yields
IFQ that is required to be delivered to
a processor with IPQ. Each year there is
a one-to-one match of the total pounds
of IFQ that must be delivered to a
processor with IPQ with the total
pounds of IPQ issued in each crab
fishery.
When the Council recommended the
CR Program, it expressed concern about
the potential for excessive consolidation
of QS and PQS, in which too few
persons control all of the QS or PQS and
the resulting annual IFQ and IPQ. The
Council determined that excessive
consolidation could have adverse effects
on crab markets, price setting
negotiations between harvesters and
processors, employment opportunities
for harvesting and processing crew, tax
revenue to communities in which crab
are landed, and other factors considered
and described in the CR Program EIS.
To address this concern, the CR Program
includes limits on the amount of QS and
PQS that a person can hold and the
amount of IFQ and IPQ that a person
can use.
The CR Program has QS and IFQ
holding and use caps that vary by
fishery because of different fleet
characteristics and differences in
historical dependency of participants on
different crab fisheries. 50 CFR
680.42(a)(2) specifies that NMFS uses
the individual and collective rule to
apply holding and use caps for QS and
IFQ for all CR Program participants,
including CDQ groups, as recommended
by the Council for monitoring
harvesting privileges (see Section 2.7 of
the RIR for more information).
For processing privileges, the CR
Program limits a person to holding no
more than 30 percent of the PQS
initially issued in the fishery, and to
using no more than the amount of IPQ
resulting from 30 percent of the PQS
initially issued in a given fishery, with
a limited exemption for persons
receiving more than 30 percent of the
initially-issued PQS (50 CFR 680.42(b)).
50 CFR 680.42(b)(3) specifies that NMFS
uses the 10-percent rule to monitor
holding and use caps for PQS and IPQ
for all CR Program participants as
recommended by the Council and
addressed in the preamble to the
proposed rule for the CR Program (69 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39745
63200, 63219 & 63226; October 29,
2004).
Use Caps for CDQ Groups
The CDQ Program was established by
the Council and NMFS in 1992, and in
1996, authorization for the Program was
incorporated into the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. The purpose of the CDQ Program
is (1) to provide eligible western Alaska
villages with the opportunity to
participate and invest in fisheries in the
BSAI, (2) to support economic
development in western Alaska, (3) to
alleviate poverty and provide economic
and social benefits for residents of
western Alaska, and (4) to achieve
sustainable and diversified local
economies in western Alaska (16 U.S.C.
1855(i)(1)(A)).
Section 305(i) of the MagnusonStevens Act describes the CDQ Program
and identifies the villages eligible to
participate in the CDQ Program through
the six entities specified in Section
305(i)(1)(D) as the CDQ groups (16
U.S.C. 1855(i)). Regulations at 50 CFR
679.2 define the term ‘‘CDQ group’’ as
an entity identified as eligible for the
CDQ Program under 16 U.S.C.
1855(i)(1)(D). The CDQ Program consists
of six different non-profit managing
organizations (CDQ groups) representing
different geographical regions in Alaska.
The CDQ Program receives annual
allocations of TACs for a variety of
commercially valuable species in the
BSAI groundfish, crab, and halibut
fisheries, which are in turn allocated
among the CDQ groups (see Section 2.8
of the RIR).
The Secretary of Commerce approved
regulations establishing the CDQ
Program pollock allocation (57 FR
54936; November 23, 1992). When the
AFA Program was implemented, the
CDQ Program received an allocation of
10 percent of the Bering Sea pollock
TAC (67 FR 79692, 79696; December 30,
2002). CDQ groups participate in the
AFA Program primarily through
ownership (wholly or partially) in
vessels authorized to fish for Bering Sea
pollock under the AFA. Vessel
ownership varies by CDQ group (see
Section 2.8.1 of the RIR). When the CR
Program was implemented in 2005, the
CDQ Program received an allocation of
10 percent of the TACs for some CR
Program fisheries (70 FR 10174, 10176–
77; March 2, 2005). In addition to the
CDQ allocations, the CDQ groups hold
QS and PQS directly as well as
indirectly through ownership in other
entities that hold QS and PQS (see
Section 2.8.3 of the RIR).
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
39746
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Need for This Proposed Rule
In 2006, Congress passed the Coast
Guard Act (Pub. L. 109–241), which
amended the CDQ Program to give CDQ
groups and their communities greater
autonomy based on recommendations
from the State of Alaska’s Blue Ribbon
Panel. Section 416(a) of the Coast Guard
Act revised section 305(i) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and made
significant changes to the management
and oversight of the CDQ Program. The
amendments to section 305(i) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act were intended to
promote the ability of CDQ groups to
responsibly manage their allocations
similar to the LAPs provided by NMFS
to most other participants in the BSAI
fisheries, while promoting the goals of
the CDQ Program (see Section 2.8 of the
RIR).
The Coast Guard Act also revised
section 305(i)(1)(F)(i) of the MagnusonStevens Act to specify that CDQ groups
would be subject to excessive share
ownership, harvesting, and processing
limitations proportional to their
ownership of entities holding such
privileges (i.e., holdings and use of
LAPs by CDQ groups are to be
determined by the ‘‘individual and
collective rule’’) (16 U.S.C.
1855(i)(1)(F)(i)). This requires NMFS to
use the individual and collective rule to
determine holding and use of harvesting
and processing privileges for CDQ
groups under all LAP programs in the
BSAI. After the 2006 amendment to the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS reviewed
its methods for determining holding and
use of harvesting and processing
privileges in all LAP programs in the
BSAI and determined that modifications
were required for the methods used to
determine CDQ group holdings and use
for (1) harvesting and processing
privileges under the AFA and (2) PQS
and IPQ under the CR Program. These
modifications were required because the
regulations implementing these
programs specified that NMFS would
use the 10-percent rule to determine
holding and use of these harvesting and
processing privileges for CDQ groups.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
This Proposed Rule and Its Anticipated
Effects
This proposed rule would revise 50
CFR 679.2, 679.7(k)(6) and (7), 680.2,
and 680.42(b).
This proposed rule would revise the
AFA Program to specify that NMFS uses
the individual and collective rule for
CDQ groups to attribute harvesting and
processing privileges of AFA pollock
proportionally to the CDQ groups’
ownership of vessels and processors
active in those fisheries. For example, if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
a CDQ group holds 15 percent
ownership of an entity that holds and
uses AFA harvesting and processing
privileges, this proposed rule would
specify that the CDQ group is attributed
15 percent of the harvest or processing
privileges of that company for purposes
of monitoring excessive harvesting and
processing use caps under the AFA.
The proposed rule would also
implement Amendment 48 to the Crab
FMP and revise the CR Program to
specify that NMFS uses the individual
and collective rule for CDQ groups to
attribute holding and use of PQS and
IPQ based on the CDQ groups’
proportional ownership of entities that
hold and use PQS and IPQ. For
example, if a CDQ group holds 15
percent ownership of a company that
holds or uses PQS or IPQ, this proposed
rule would specify that the CDQ group
is attributed 15 percent of the holding
or use of that PQS or IPQ. The proposed
rule would not alter the regulations for
the QS and IFQ holding and use caps
under the CR Program because current
CR Program regulations specify that
NMFS uses the individual and
collective rule for all program
participants, including CDQ groups, to
attribute any participants’ holding and
use of QS and IFQ based on their
proportional ownership of entities that
hold and use QS and IFQ.
NMFS has used the individual and
collective rule for CDQ group ownership
attribution for both the AFA Program
and the CR Program since enactment of
the Coast Guard Act; however, the
regulations and the Crab FMP have not
been updated to reflect this change. This
proposed rule would update the
regulations and the Crab FMP to be
consistent with NMFS’ current method
of ownership attribution for CDQ groups
and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This
proposed rule would benefit CDQ
groups and the public by clarifying the
method NMFS uses to attribute holding
and use of harvesting and processing
privileges by CDQ groups for purposes
of monitoring holding and use caps for
the AFA and CR Programs.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with Amendment 48, the
Crab FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration of comments received
during the public comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866. The
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. NMFS requests comments on
the decision to certify this proposed
rule. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
This proposed action would revise
regulations and the Crab FMP so that
they are consistent with the ownership
attribution method mandated by the
Magnuson-Stevens Act for CDQ groups
for monitoring limitations on the
holding and use of harvesting and
processing privileges in the AFA and CR
Programs.
The CDQ groups would be the
directly regulated entities under the
proposed regulatory revisions. All six of
the CDQ groups are non-profit
corporations and are considered small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. As NMFS, one of the agencies that
manages these holding and use
limitations, has already implemented
these provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act in practice, this proposed
action is not expected to materially
change how any small entities are
regulated, nor is the proposed action
expected to impose significant
compliance costs or materially change
how any small entities comply with the
applicable regulations. Rather, this
proposed rule would benefit CDQ
groups and the public by clarifying the
method NMFS uses to attribute holding
and use of harvesting and processing
privileges by CDQ groups for purposes
of monitoring holding and use caps for
the AFA and CR Programs. This
proposed action therefore is not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of the
small entities regulated by this proposed
action—the CDQ groups. As a result, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required, and none has been
prepared.
The economic analysis contained in
the RIR for this action (see ADDRESSES)
further describes the regulatory and
operational characteristics of the CDQ
Program, including the participation of
CDQ groups in the AFA Program and
the CR Program, the history of this
action, and the details of the alternatives
considered for this action, including the
preferred alternative.
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements
This rule references collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
have been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB Control Number 0648–0514. The
annual application for a crab IFQ permit
and the application for a crab IPQ
permit are mentioned in this rule;
however, there are no changes to these
forms or to who is required to submit
the forms for this proposed rule, and
therefore there would be no change in
burden or cost.
Send comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection of information,
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES), and by email
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or
fax to 202–395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirement of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
No relevant Federal rules have been
identified that would duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this proposed rule.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 15, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 and part 680 as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 679 continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
2. In § 679.2, revise the definitions for
‘‘AFA entity’’ and ‘‘Affiliation for the
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
purpose of defining AFA and the
Rockfish Program’’ to read as follows:
§ 679.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
AFA entity means a group of affiliated
individuals, corporations, or other
business concerns, except for a CDQ
group, that harvests or processes pollock
in the BS directed pollock fishery.
*
*
*
*
*
Affiliation for the purpose of defining
AFA and the Rockfish Program means a
relationship between two or more
individuals, corporations, or other
business concerns, except CDQ groups,
in which one concern directly or
indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater
interest in another, exerts control over
another, or has the power to exert
control over another; or a third
individual, corporation, or other
business concern directly or indirectly
owns a 10 percent or greater interest in
both, exerts control over both, or has the
power to exert control over both.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 679.7 revise paragraphs (k)(6)
and (k)(7) to read as follows:
§ 679.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(6) Excessive harvesting shares. It is
unlawful for an AFA entity or a CDQ
group to harvest, through a fishery
cooperative or otherwise, an amount of
BS pollock that exceeds the 17.5 percent
excessive share limit specified under
§ 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). A CDQ group’s
harvest of BS pollock will be calculated
through its proportional ownership of
individuals, corporations, or other
business concerns that harvest BS
pollock. The owners and operators of
the individual vessels comprising the
AFA entity or CDQ group that harvest
BS pollock will be held jointly and
severally liable for exceeding the
excessive harvesting share limit.
(7) Excessive processing shares. It is
unlawful for an AFA entity or a CDQ
group to process an amount of BS
pollock that exceeds the 30-percent
excessive share limit specified under
§ 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). The amount of BS
pollock processed by a CDQ group will
be calculated through its proportional
ownership of individuals, corporations,
or other business concerns that process
BS pollock. The owners and operators of
the individual processors comprising
the AFA entity or CDQ group that
process BS pollock will be held jointly
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39747
and severally liable for exceeding the
excessive processing share limit.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 680—SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF
THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE
OFF ALASKA
4. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 680 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109–
241; Pub. L. 109–479.
5. In § 680.2, revise the introductory
text to the definition for ‘‘Affiliation’’
and the introductory text of paragraph
(1) of the definition for ‘‘Affiliation’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 680.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Affiliation means a relationship
between two or more entities, except for
CDQ groups, in which one directly or
indirectly owns or controls a 10 percent
or greater interest in, or otherwise
controls, another, or a third entity
directly or indirectly owns or controls a
10 percent or greater interest in, or
otherwise controls, both. For the
purpose of this definition, the following
terms are further defined:
(1) Entity. An entity may be an
individual, corporation, association,
partnership, joint-stock company, trust,
or any other type of legal entity, except
for a CDQ group, any receiver, trustee in
bankruptcy or similar official or
liquidating agent, or any organized
group of persons whether incorporated
or not, that holds direct or indirect
interest in:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 680.42, revise paragraphs
(b)(3)(ii), (b)(3)(iii), and (b)(3)(iv) to read
as follows:
§ 680.42 Limitations on use of QS, PQS,
IFQ, and IPQ.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Is not a CDQ group and directly
or indirectly owns a 10 percent or
greater interest in an entity that holds
PQS.
(iii) A person that is not a CDQ group
and holds PQS is limited to a PQS use
cap that is calculated based on the sum
of all PQS held by that PQS holder and
all PQS held by any affiliate of the PQS
holder. A CDQ group that holds PQS is
limited to a PQS use cap that is
calculated based on the sum of all PQS
held, individually or collectively, by
that CDQ group.
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
39748
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(iv) A person that is not a CDQ group
and holds IPQ is limited to an IPQ use
cap that is calculated based on the sum
of all IPQ held by that IPQ holder and
all IPQ held by any affiliate of the IPQ
holder. A CDQ group that holds IPQ is
limited to an IPQ use cap that is
calculated based on the sum of all IPQ
held, individually or collectively, by
that CDQ group.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–17607 Filed 8–21–17; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39743-39748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17607]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 679 and 680
[Docket No. 170412391-7391-01]
RIN 0648-BG84
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area; American Fisheries Act; Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues a proposed rule to implement Amendment 48 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner
Crabs (Crab FMP) and a regulatory amendment to revise regulations
implementing the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Program and the Crab
Rationalization (CR) Program. This proposed rule would revise how NMFS
determines the amount of limited access privileges held and used by
groups in the Western Alaska Community Development Quota Program (CDQ
Program) for the purposes of managing the excessive share limits under
the AFA Program and the CR Program. This proposed rule is necessary to
align regulations and the Crab FMP to be consistent with an amendment
to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and NMFS' current method of managing excessive
share limits for CDQ groups in the AFA Program and the CR Program. This
proposed rule is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Crab FMP, and other applicable law.
DATES: Submit comments on or before September 21, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number NOAA-NMFS-2017-
0038, by either of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0038, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP, the Regulatory
Impact Review (RIR), and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this
proposed action are available from https://www.regulations.gov or from
the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
The CR Program Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), RIR, and Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, as well as the AFA Program EIS and
RIR, are available from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keeley Kent, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the pollock fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) off Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI FMP). NMFS
manages the king and Tanner crab fisheries in the U.S. EEZ of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) under the Crab FMP. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS
approved, the BSAI FMP and the Crab FMP under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing and
implementing the BSAI FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
Regulations governing and implementing the Crab FMP appear at 50 CFR
parts 600 and 680.
A notice of availability for Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP was
published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2017. Comment on
Amendment 48 is invited through October 2, 2017. All relevant written
comments received by the end of the comment period, whether
specifically directed to the FMP amendment, this proposed rule, or
both, will be considered in the approval/disapproval decision for
Amendment 48 and addressed in the response to comments in the final
rule.
Background
This proposed rule would modify regulations that specify how NMFS
determines holding and use of limited access privileges (LAPs) for the
purposes of managing excessive share limits for CDQ groups under the
AFA Program and the CR Program. The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS
to establish excessive share limits to prevent excessive consolidation
of harvesting and processing LAPs in order to maintain an appropriate
distribution of economic and social benefits for fishery participants
and communities. NMFS has adopted regulations under its LAP programs to
ensure that no person holds or uses more LAPs than authorized under
excessive share limits established for each LAP program. Section 305(i)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act describes the Western Alaska Community
Development Quota Program (CDQ Program) (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)).
Regulations at 50 CFR 679.2 define the term ``CDQ group'' as an entity
identified as eligible for the CDQ Program under 16 U.S.C.
1855(i)(1)(D).
[[Page 39744]]
This proposed rule would revise the regulations that prescribe the
calculation of excessive share limits for CDQ groups for two LAP
programs: The AFA Program and the CR Program. CDQ groups participate in
LAP programs, including the AFA and the CR Program, by purchasing
harvesting and processing privileges and through ownership of vessels
and processors that participate in these fisheries. The Magnuson-
Stevens Act was amended by the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation
Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-241; the Coast Guard Act) to specify the
method that NMFS must use for monitoring excessive share limits as they
apply to CDQ groups--the proportional or ``individual and collective''
rule. Section 305(i)(1)(F)(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended
by the Coast Guard Act, provides that CDQ groups shall be subject to
any excessive share ownership, harvesting, or processing limitations in
the fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area
only to the extent of the CDQ group's proportional ownership (16 U.S.C.
1855(i)(1)(F)(i)).
NMFS has implemented in practice the method specified in the 2006
amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Act for CDQ groups to monitor
excessive share limits in the AFA Program and the CR Program; however,
the regulations for the AFA Program and the CR Program and the Crab FMP
have not been revised to be consistent with the 2006 amendment to the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The following sections describe (1) excessive share limits, which
are also called holding and use caps, (2) AFA Program use caps, (3) CR
Program holding and use caps, (4) CDQ Program holding and use caps, and
(5) this proposed rule and the anticipated effects of the action.
Excessive Share Limits
Section 301(a)(4) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act specifies that if
conservation and management measures allocate or assign fishing
privileges, the measures must be carried out so that no particular
individual, corporation, or other entity acquires an excessive share of
such privileges (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4)). Section 303A(c)(5)(D) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires regional fishery management councils to
establish excessive share limits for LAP programs to prevent excessive
accumulation of privileges by participants in the LAP programs (16
U.S.C. 1853a(c)(5)(D)). The intent of these limits or caps is to
prevent excessive consolidation in the harvesting and processing
sectors in order to maintain an appropriate distribution of economic
and social benefits for fishery participants and communities. Because
determination of excessive shares must consider the specific
circumstances of each fishery, the Council has implemented different
excessive share limits in the LAP programs in Alaska's fisheries,
including the AFA and CR Programs.
NMFS implemented use caps for the AFA Program in 2002 (67 FR 79692;
December 30, 2002) and holding and use caps for the CR Program in 2005
(70 FR 10174; March 2, 2005). The regulations prohibit a person from
using more than the harvesting and processing limits established in the
AFA Program and from holding and using more than a specific portion of
the LAPs allocated under the CR Program. Under 50 CFR 679.2, ``person''
includes individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations, and
other non-individual entities. To monitor holdings and use of LAPs,
NMFS determines what portion of a program's harvesting and processing
privileges a person holds and uses to ensure that no person holds or
uses more privileges than authorized by the applicable excessive share
cap.
NMFS determines a person's holding and use of a LAP in the AFA
Program and CR Program by summing (1) the amount directly held and used
by that person, and (2) the amount held and used by that person
indirectly through an ownership interest in or control of another
entity that also holds and uses the LAP. Businesses that hold and use
LAPs in the AFA Program and the CR Program are often composed of
multiple owners that have ownership interests in multiple fishing
businesses. In cases where a LAP is held by a business entity with more
than one owner, NMFS applies the holding and use caps to each entity
that holds or controls the LAP to monitor whether those entities each
exceed the established caps. Ownership attribution refers to the method
NMFS uses to assess the relationships between different entities that
participate in LAP programs.
NMFS uses two ownership attribution methods to determine holdings
and use of LAPs. These two methods for attributing ownership and use of
a LAP are commonly known as the ``individual and collective rule'' and
the ``10-percent rule.'' Under the individual and collective rule, NMFS
attributes holding and use of LAPs by one person proportionally to
their ownership in or control of another entity that holds and uses
LAPs. For example, if Company A has a 15 percent ownership of Company B
that holds LAPs, Company A would be attributed 15 percent of Company
B's holding and use of the LAPs. In contrast, under the 10-percent
rule, a person is attributed 100 percent of an entity's LAPs if that
person owns or otherwise controls ten percent or more of that entity.
Thus, if Company A holds or controls 10 percent or more of Company B,
then 100 percent of Company B's holdings and use of LAPs are attributed
to Company A. When a person owns or controls 10 percent or more of
another entity, the individual and collective rule is less restrictive
than the 10-percent rule because a person is only attributed holding
and use in proportion to how much that person owns or controls of other
entities, rather than attributing 100 percent of the other entity's LAP
holdings once the 10-percent ownership or control threshold is met.
Thus, under a holding and use cap, the individual and collective rule
would allow a person to hold and use more LAPs than if the person was
evaluated using the 10-percent rule.
AFA Program Use Caps
Congress passed the AFA in October 1998 to implement additional
U.S. ownership requirements for vessels harvesting fish from the EEZ.
The purpose of the AFA was to tighten U.S. ownership standards that had
been exploited under the Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Anti-
Reflagging Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-239) and to provide the BSAI
pollock fleet the opportunity to conduct their fishery in a more
rational manner (i.e., stopping the race for fish) while protecting
non-AFA participants in the other fisheries. The AFA established sector
allocations in the BSAI pollock fishery, determined eligible vessels
and processors, allowed for the formation of cooperatives, set limits
on the participation of AFA vessels in other fisheries, and imposed
special catch weighing and monitoring requirements on AFA vessels. The
AFA also divided the available BSAI pollock directed fishing allowance
among three harvesting sectors, after CDQ allocations and an amount for
incidental catch of pollock by non-AFA vessels were deducted.
Section 210(e) of the AFA set out excessive harvesting and
processing limits for participants. Section 210(e)(1) of the AFA
restricts an individual, corporation, or other entity to harvesting no
more than 17.5 percent of the pollock available to be harvested in the
directed pollock fishery. This limit is codified at 50 CFR
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). Every year, this limit is published in the
annual harvest specifications (82 FR 11826; February 27, 2017).
[[Page 39745]]
Section 210(e)(2) of the AFA directed the Council to create
management measures to prevent any particular individual or entity from
processing an excessive share of pollock available in the directed
pollock fishery. The Council and NMFS set this limit at 30 percent of
the sum of the directed fishing allowances for pollock. This limit is
codified at 50 CFR 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). Every year, this limit is
published in the annual harvest specifications (82 FR 11826; February
27, 2017).
Section 210(e)(3) of the AFA also specified that any entity in
which 10 percent or more of the interest is held or controlled by
another individual or entity shall be considered to be the same entity
as the other individual or entity for purposes of monitoring the
harvesting and processing use caps. This section of the AFA directed
NMFS to use the 10-percent rule to determine the use of AFA Program
harvesting and processing privileges. NMFS implemented this AFA
requirement in part by defining an ``AFA entity'' at 50 CFR 679.2 as a
group of affiliated individuals, corporations, or other business
concerns that harvest or process pollock in the Bering Sea directed
pollock fishery. The proposed rule to implement the AFA Program stated
that the concept of ``affiliation'' is central to the definition of
``AFA entity'' (66 FR 65028, 65049; December 17, 2001). As the December
2001 proposed rule explained, ``affiliation'' means a relationship
between two or more individuals, corporations, or other business
concerns in which one concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent
or greater interest in the other, exerts 10 percent or greater control
over the other, or has the power to exert 10 percent or greater control
over the other; or a third individual, corporation, or other business
concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater interest in
both, exerts 10 percent or greater control over both, or has the power
to exert 10 percent or greater control over both (see regulations at
Sec. 679.2 for the definition of ``affiliation'' and Section 2.6.3 of
the RIR for more information).
CR Program Use Caps
The CR Program was implemented on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 10174; March
2, 2005). The CR Program established a LAP program for nine crab
fisheries in the BSAI and assigned quota share (QS) to persons based on
their historic participation in one or more of those nine BSAI crab
fisheries during a specific period. Each year, a person who holds QS
may receive an exclusive harvest privilege for a portion of the annual
total allowable catch (TAC). This annual exclusive harvest privilege is
called individual fishing quota (IFQ).
NMFS also issued processor quota share (PQS) under the CR Program.
Each year, PQS yields an exclusive privilege to process a portion of
the IFQ in each of the nine BSAI crab fisheries. This annual exclusive
processing privilege is called individual processor quota (IPQ). Only a
portion of the QS issued yields IFQ that is required to be delivered to
a processor with IPQ. Each year there is a one-to-one match of the
total pounds of IFQ that must be delivered to a processor with IPQ with
the total pounds of IPQ issued in each crab fishery.
When the Council recommended the CR Program, it expressed concern
about the potential for excessive consolidation of QS and PQS, in which
too few persons control all of the QS or PQS and the resulting annual
IFQ and IPQ. The Council determined that excessive consolidation could
have adverse effects on crab markets, price setting negotiations
between harvesters and processors, employment opportunities for
harvesting and processing crew, tax revenue to communities in which
crab are landed, and other factors considered and described in the CR
Program EIS. To address this concern, the CR Program includes limits on
the amount of QS and PQS that a person can hold and the amount of IFQ
and IPQ that a person can use.
The CR Program has QS and IFQ holding and use caps that vary by
fishery because of different fleet characteristics and differences in
historical dependency of participants on different crab fisheries. 50
CFR 680.42(a)(2) specifies that NMFS uses the individual and collective
rule to apply holding and use caps for QS and IFQ for all CR Program
participants, including CDQ groups, as recommended by the Council for
monitoring harvesting privileges (see Section 2.7 of the RIR for more
information).
For processing privileges, the CR Program limits a person to
holding no more than 30 percent of the PQS initially issued in the
fishery, and to using no more than the amount of IPQ resulting from 30
percent of the PQS initially issued in a given fishery, with a limited
exemption for persons receiving more than 30 percent of the initially-
issued PQS (50 CFR 680.42(b)). 50 CFR 680.42(b)(3) specifies that NMFS
uses the 10-percent rule to monitor holding and use caps for PQS and
IPQ for all CR Program participants as recommended by the Council and
addressed in the preamble to the proposed rule for the CR Program (69
FR 63200, 63219 & 63226; October 29, 2004).
Use Caps for CDQ Groups
The CDQ Program was established by the Council and NMFS in 1992,
and in 1996, authorization for the Program was incorporated into the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The purpose of the CDQ Program is (1) to provide
eligible western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate
and invest in fisheries in the BSAI, (2) to support economic
development in western Alaska, (3) to alleviate poverty and provide
economic and social benefits for residents of western Alaska, and (4)
to achieve sustainable and diversified local economies in western
Alaska (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(A)).
Section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act describes the CDQ
Program and identifies the villages eligible to participate in the CDQ
Program through the six entities specified in Section 305(i)(1)(D) as
the CDQ groups (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)). Regulations at 50 CFR 679.2 define
the term ``CDQ group'' as an entity identified as eligible for the CDQ
Program under 16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(D). The CDQ Program consists of six
different non-profit managing organizations (CDQ groups) representing
different geographical regions in Alaska. The CDQ Program receives
annual allocations of TACs for a variety of commercially valuable
species in the BSAI groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries, which are
in turn allocated among the CDQ groups (see Section 2.8 of the RIR).
The Secretary of Commerce approved regulations establishing the CDQ
Program pollock allocation (57 FR 54936; November 23, 1992). When the
AFA Program was implemented, the CDQ Program received an allocation of
10 percent of the Bering Sea pollock TAC (67 FR 79692, 79696; December
30, 2002). CDQ groups participate in the AFA Program primarily through
ownership (wholly or partially) in vessels authorized to fish for
Bering Sea pollock under the AFA. Vessel ownership varies by CDQ group
(see Section 2.8.1 of the RIR). When the CR Program was implemented in
2005, the CDQ Program received an allocation of 10 percent of the TACs
for some CR Program fisheries (70 FR 10174, 10176-77; March 2, 2005).
In addition to the CDQ allocations, the CDQ groups hold QS and PQS
directly as well as indirectly through ownership in other entities that
hold QS and PQS (see Section 2.8.3 of the RIR).
[[Page 39746]]
Need for This Proposed Rule
In 2006, Congress passed the Coast Guard Act (Pub. L. 109-241),
which amended the CDQ Program to give CDQ groups and their communities
greater autonomy based on recommendations from the State of Alaska's
Blue Ribbon Panel. Section 416(a) of the Coast Guard Act revised
section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and made significant changes
to the management and oversight of the CDQ Program. The amendments to
section 305(i) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act were intended to promote the
ability of CDQ groups to responsibly manage their allocations similar
to the LAPs provided by NMFS to most other participants in the BSAI
fisheries, while promoting the goals of the CDQ Program (see Section
2.8 of the RIR).
The Coast Guard Act also revised section 305(i)(1)(F)(i) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act to specify that CDQ groups would be subject to
excessive share ownership, harvesting, and processing limitations
proportional to their ownership of entities holding such privileges
(i.e., holdings and use of LAPs by CDQ groups are to be determined by
the ``individual and collective rule'') (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)(1)(F)(i)).
This requires NMFS to use the individual and collective rule to
determine holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges for
CDQ groups under all LAP programs in the BSAI. After the 2006 amendment
to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS reviewed its methods for determining
holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges in all LAP
programs in the BSAI and determined that modifications were required
for the methods used to determine CDQ group holdings and use for (1)
harvesting and processing privileges under the AFA and (2) PQS and IPQ
under the CR Program. These modifications were required because the
regulations implementing these programs specified that NMFS would use
the 10-percent rule to determine holding and use of these harvesting
and processing privileges for CDQ groups.
This Proposed Rule and Its Anticipated Effects
This proposed rule would revise 50 CFR 679.2, 679.7(k)(6) and (7),
680.2, and 680.42(b).
This proposed rule would revise the AFA Program to specify that
NMFS uses the individual and collective rule for CDQ groups to
attribute harvesting and processing privileges of AFA pollock
proportionally to the CDQ groups' ownership of vessels and processors
active in those fisheries. For example, if a CDQ group holds 15 percent
ownership of an entity that holds and uses AFA harvesting and
processing privileges, this proposed rule would specify that the CDQ
group is attributed 15 percent of the harvest or processing privileges
of that company for purposes of monitoring excessive harvesting and
processing use caps under the AFA.
The proposed rule would also implement Amendment 48 to the Crab FMP
and revise the CR Program to specify that NMFS uses the individual and
collective rule for CDQ groups to attribute holding and use of PQS and
IPQ based on the CDQ groups' proportional ownership of entities that
hold and use PQS and IPQ. For example, if a CDQ group holds 15 percent
ownership of a company that holds or uses PQS or IPQ, this proposed
rule would specify that the CDQ group is attributed 15 percent of the
holding or use of that PQS or IPQ. The proposed rule would not alter
the regulations for the QS and IFQ holding and use caps under the CR
Program because current CR Program regulations specify that NMFS uses
the individual and collective rule for all program participants,
including CDQ groups, to attribute any participants' holding and use of
QS and IFQ based on their proportional ownership of entities that hold
and use QS and IFQ.
NMFS has used the individual and collective rule for CDQ group
ownership attribution for both the AFA Program and the CR Program since
enactment of the Coast Guard Act; however, the regulations and the Crab
FMP have not been updated to reflect this change. This proposed rule
would update the regulations and the Crab FMP to be consistent with
NMFS' current method of ownership attribution for CDQ groups and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. This proposed rule would benefit CDQ groups and
the public by clarifying the method NMFS uses to attribute holding and
use of harvesting and processing privileges by CDQ groups for purposes
of monitoring holding and use caps for the AFA and CR Programs.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with Amendment 48, the Crab FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration of comments received during the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866. The Chief Counsel for Regulation
of the Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. NMFS requests comments on the
decision to certify this proposed rule. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
This proposed action would revise regulations and the Crab FMP so
that they are consistent with the ownership attribution method mandated
by the Magnuson-Stevens Act for CDQ groups for monitoring limitations
on the holding and use of harvesting and processing privileges in the
AFA and CR Programs.
The CDQ groups would be the directly regulated entities under the
proposed regulatory revisions. All six of the CDQ groups are non-profit
corporations and are considered small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. As NMFS, one of the agencies that manages these
holding and use limitations, has already implemented these provisions
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act in practice, this proposed action is not
expected to materially change how any small entities are regulated, nor
is the proposed action expected to impose significant compliance costs
or materially change how any small entities comply with the applicable
regulations. Rather, this proposed rule would benefit CDQ groups and
the public by clarifying the method NMFS uses to attribute holding and
use of harvesting and processing privileges by CDQ groups for purposes
of monitoring holding and use caps for the AFA and CR Programs. This
proposed action therefore is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of the small entities regulated
by this proposed action--the CDQ groups. As a result, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required, and none has been
prepared.
The economic analysis contained in the RIR for this action (see
ADDRESSES) further describes the regulatory and operational
characteristics of the CDQ Program, including the participation of CDQ
groups in the AFA Program and the CR Program, the history of this
action, and the details of the alternatives considered for this action,
including the preferred alternative.
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
This rule references collection-of-information requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which
[[Page 39747]]
have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB Control Number 0648-0514. The annual application for a crab IFQ
permit and the application for a crab IPQ permit are mentioned in this
rule; however, there are no changes to these forms or to who is
required to submit the forms for this proposed rule, and therefore
there would be no change in burden or cost.
Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of
information, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES), and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirement of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
No relevant Federal rules have been identified that would
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 15, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 and part 680 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.2, revise the definitions for ``AFA entity'' and
``Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA and the Rockfish
Program'' to read as follows:
Sec. 679.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
AFA entity means a group of affiliated individuals, corporations,
or other business concerns, except for a CDQ group, that harvests or
processes pollock in the BS directed pollock fishery.
* * * * *
Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA and the Rockfish
Program means a relationship between two or more individuals,
corporations, or other business concerns, except CDQ groups, in which
one concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater
interest in another, exerts control over another, or has the power to
exert control over another; or a third individual, corporation, or
other business concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or
greater interest in both, exerts control over both, or has the power to
exert control over both.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 679.7 revise paragraphs (k)(6) and (k)(7) to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(6) Excessive harvesting shares. It is unlawful for an AFA entity
or a CDQ group to harvest, through a fishery cooperative or otherwise,
an amount of BS pollock that exceeds the 17.5 percent excessive share
limit specified under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6). A CDQ group's
harvest of BS pollock will be calculated through its proportional
ownership of individuals, corporations, or other business concerns that
harvest BS pollock. The owners and operators of the individual vessels
comprising the AFA entity or CDQ group that harvest BS pollock will be
held jointly and severally liable for exceeding the excessive
harvesting share limit.
(7) Excessive processing shares. It is unlawful for an AFA entity
or a CDQ group to process an amount of BS pollock that exceeds the 30-
percent excessive share limit specified under Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7). The amount of BS pollock processed by a CDQ
group will be calculated through its proportional ownership of
individuals, corporations, or other business concerns that process BS
pollock. The owners and operators of the individual processors
comprising the AFA entity or CDQ group that process BS pollock will be
held jointly and severally liable for exceeding the excessive
processing share limit.
* * * * *
PART 680--SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
0
4. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub. L. 109-479.
0
5. In Sec. 680.2, revise the introductory text to the definition for
``Affiliation'' and the introductory text of paragraph (1) of the
definition for ``Affiliation'' to read as follows:
Sec. 680.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Affiliation means a relationship between two or more entities,
except for CDQ groups, in which one directly or indirectly owns or
controls a 10 percent or greater interest in, or otherwise controls,
another, or a third entity directly or indirectly owns or controls a 10
percent or greater interest in, or otherwise controls, both. For the
purpose of this definition, the following terms are further defined:
(1) Entity. An entity may be an individual, corporation,
association, partnership, joint-stock company, trust, or any other type
of legal entity, except for a CDQ group, any receiver, trustee in
bankruptcy or similar official or liquidating agent, or any organized
group of persons whether incorporated or not, that holds direct or
indirect interest in:
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 680.42, revise paragraphs (b)(3)(ii), (b)(3)(iii), and
(b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 680.42 Limitations on use of QS, PQS, IFQ, and IPQ.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Is not a CDQ group and directly or indirectly owns a 10
percent or greater interest in an entity that holds PQS.
(iii) A person that is not a CDQ group and holds PQS is limited to
a PQS use cap that is calculated based on the sum of all PQS held by
that PQS holder and all PQS held by any affiliate of the PQS holder. A
CDQ group that holds PQS is limited to a PQS use cap that is calculated
based on the sum of all PQS held, individually or collectively, by that
CDQ group.
[[Page 39748]]
(iv) A person that is not a CDQ group and holds IPQ is limited to
an IPQ use cap that is calculated based on the sum of all IPQ held by
that IPQ holder and all IPQ held by any affiliate of the IPQ holder. A
CDQ group that holds IPQ is limited to an IPQ use cap that is
calculated based on the sum of all IPQ held, individually or
collectively, by that CDQ group.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-17607 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P