Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Coos Bay Channel Modification Project, 39417-39418 [2017-17483]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 159 / Friday, August 18, 2017 / Notices
subcontract for ammunition or
explosives.
3. DFARS 252.223–7003, Changes in
Place of Performance—Ammunition
and Explosives. Paragraph (a) requires
the offeror to identify, in the Place of
Performance provision of the
solicitation, the place of performance of
all ammunition and explosives work
covered by the Safety Precautions for
Ammunition and Explosives clause of
the solicitation. Paragraphs (b) and (c)
require the offeror or contractor to
obtain written permission from the
contracting officer before changing the
place of performance after the date set
for receipt of offers or after contract
award.
4. DFARS 252.223–7007,
Safeguarding Sensitive Conventional
Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives.
Paragraph (e) requires the contractor to
notify the cognizant Defense Security
Service field office within 10 days after
award of any subcontract involving
sensitive conventional arms,
ammunition, and explosives within the
scope of DoD 5100.76–M.
5. DFARS 252.223–7004, Drug-Free
Work Force. The clause requires that
certain contractors maintain records
necessary to demonstrate reasonable
efforts to eliminate the unlawful use by
contractor employees of controlled
substances. DoD does not regularly
collect any information with regard to
this clause.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
[FR Doc. 2017–17515 Filed 8–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Coos Bay Channel Modification
Project
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Portland District intends to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to analyze the potential
environmental effects of approving the
Oregon International Port of Coos Bay’s
(OIPCB) proposed Coos Bay Channel
Modification Project. The OIPCB
proposes to widen and deepen the Coos
Bay Federal Navigation Project from the
ocean to river mile (RM) 8.2 to improve
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Aug 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
navigation efficiency, reduce shipping
transportation costs and facilitate the
shipping industry’s transition to larger,
more efficient vessels.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit written comments on or before
October 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Portland District (PM–E), P.O. Box 2946,
Portland, OR 97208–2946, or at the
project Web site: https://www.nwp.usace.
army.mil/coast/coos-bay/channelmodification. All comments should
include ‘‘Coos Bay Channel
Modification Project EIS’’ in the subject
line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and draft EIS can be addressed to: Dr.
Ann Hodgson, by mail, telephone (503)
808–4663, or by email at coosbay
channelmodEIS@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1.
Previous Withdrawn Action. The Corps
published a Notice of Intent to prepare
an EIS and Feasibility Study for a
previous proposal to modify the Coos
Bay Federal Navigation Project on
January 11, 2008 (73 FR 2013). The
channel modification described in 2008
was proposed under the authority of
Section 203 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986; however, the
proposal was withdrawn and a draft EIS
was not prepared.
2. Proposed Action. The OIPCB is
requesting approval to construct the
Coos Bay Channel Modification Project.
If approved, the OIPCB would construct
the project without any federal cost
sharing (i.e., the OIPCB would pay 100
percent of the cost of construction). The
proposed project requires Department of
the Army authorization under: Section
204 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986, as amended
(33 U.S.C. 2232); Section 14 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33
U.S.C. 408, commonly referred to as
Section 408), Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403);
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344); and Section 103 of the
Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (33
U.S.C. 1413).
Section 204 authorizes the Secretary
of the Army, acting through the
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil
Works, to grant approval to non-federal
entities to design and construct
improvements to Corps navigation
projects. This section also provides that
the Secretary shall be responsible for the
operation and maintenance of those
improvements if the Secretary
determines the improvements are
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39417
economically justified, environmentally
acceptable and certifies the project was
constructed in accordance with
applicable permits and engineering and
design standards.
Section 408 authorizes the Secretary
of the Army, acting through the Chief of
Engineers, to grant permission for the
alteration or occupation or use of Corps
Civil Works projects (e.g., a federal
navigation project) if the Secretary
determines that the activity will not be
injurious to the public interest and will
not impair the usefulness of the project.
Section 10, Section 404, and Section
103 authorizes the Secretary of the
Army, acting through the Chief of
Engineers, to issue permits to authorize
work in navigable waters of the U.S., to
authorize the discharge of dredged of fill
material into waters of the U.S., and to
authorize the transport of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it
into ocean waters, respectively.
The Corps, as the lead agency for
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), has
determined the above-listed actions
require the preparation of an EIS. The
following state and federal agencies may
participate as cooperating agencies for
the preparation of the EIS: The Bureau
of Land Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, National Marine
Fisheries Service, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Federal Aviation
Administration, the U.S. Coast Guard,
Oregon Department of Fish and
Wildlife, Oregon Department of Land
Conservation and Development, Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality.
In addition, the Confederated Tribes of
the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw,
Confederated Tribes of the Siletz
Indians, and the Coquille Indian Tribe
may participate as cooperating entities
on the preparation of the EIS.
3. Project Site and Background. The
project site is in Coos Bay, located on
the southern coast of Oregon. The Coos
Bay Federal Navigation Project was
originally authorized by the Rivers and
Harbors Act of March 1879. The Coos
Bay Federal Navigation Project includes
two entrance jetties, the two navigation
channels, two turning basins, and pile
dikes. The current channel
configuration from the ocean entrance to
the navigation channel is ¥47 feet deep,
the channel transitions to ¥37 feet deep
between RM 0 to RM 1, then maintains
¥37 feet deep from RM 1 to RM 15.0.
The main channel has a nominal width
of 300 feet wide from the ocean inlet to
RM 9.2. At RM 9.2, the channel widens
to 400 feet and continues at that width
to RM 15.0; from RM 15.0 through RM
17.0, the channel decreases to ¥22 feet
deep and 150 feet wide. Advanced
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
39418
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 159 / Friday, August 18, 2017 / Notices
maintenance dredging and allowable
overdepth dredging (standard practice
on deep draft navigation channels)
results in a depth approximately five
feet deeper than the authorized depth.
The secondary channel, known as the
Charleston Channel, is not included in
the proposed project.
4. Project Description. The OIPCB
proposes to deepen and widen the
navigation channel from the ocean to
approximately RM 8.2. The project
would require the dredging and disposal
of approximately 18 million cubic yards
of material (sand and rock) to deepen
and widen the navigation channel. The
proposed navigation channel
configuration would be ¥45 feet deep
with a nominal width of 450 feet wide.
The entrance to the navigation channel
at the ocean would have a nominal
width of 1,280 feet and an authorized
depth of 57 feet MLLW at its offshore
entrance. The channel width would
transition to a width of 450 feet at RM
1; this narrowing is continuous from the
offshore entrance until RM 1. Upstream
of RM 1, the proposed channel would
have a nominal width of 450 feet and an
authorized depth of 45 feet MLLW. The
proposed project design would also
accommodate advance maintenance
dredging and allowable overdepth
dredging of approximately five feet
deeper than the proposed depths. The
modified channel would have a vesselturning basin extending from RM 7.3 to
RM 7.8. At its full width, the proposed
vessel-turning basin is 1,400-feet-long
and 1,100-feet-wide, with an authorized
depth of 37 feet MLLW. The portion of
the channel that intersects this turning
basin will have an authorized depth of
45 feet MLLW. The Port proposes to
dispose of this dredged material at a
newly proposed Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Site located
approximately two miles offshore of the
navigation channel entrance. The
proposed disposal site would have an
area of approximately 1,850 acres in
water depths ranging from ¥140 to
¥320 feet deep. The channel
modification project would include
improvements to the North Jetty to
alleviate impacts from the entrance
channel widening, deepening, and
lengthening, and to retard erosion at
Log-Spiral Bay, by placing rock at the
jetty toe and by increasing the size of
the rock along the jetty head. The
channel modification would also
include the relocation and expansion of
aids to navigation by relocating and
installing new fixed and floating
channel and range markers. The Corps
will be responsible for the operation and
maintenance of these improvements if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Aug 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
the Secretary determines the
improvements are economically
justified, environmentally acceptable
and certifies the project was constructed
in accordance with applicable permits
and engineering and design standards.
5. Alternatives. The draft EIS will
evaluate a range of reasonable
alternatives. Alternatives may include,
but are not limited to, no action,
alternative channel widths and depths,
and alternative dredged material
disposal locations.
6. Other Environmental Reviews and
Consultations. Other environmental
reviews and consultations for the
proposed project may include, but is not
limited to, Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act, Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act, Section 305 of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
Section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act, and Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
7. Scoping Process and Public
Comments. The Corps will conduct
public scoping (40 CFR 1501.7) to
determine the scope of issues (40 CFR
1508.25) to be addressed in the draft EIS
and to identify the significant issues
related to the proposed project. All
interested parties including individuals;
organizations; local, state, and federal
agencies; and tribes and tribal
governments are invited to participate
in the scoping process for the draft EIS,
which will analyze numerous issues in
depth. These issues include, but are not
limited to: Navigation, socioeconomics,
fish and wildlife, water quality, safety,
shoreline erosion and accretion,
recreation, and cultural and historic
resources. Scoping comments also will
be used to develop possible project
alternatives. Additional project
information is available online at:
www.nwp.usace.army.mil/coast/coosbay/channel-modification. All parties
are invited to participate in the scoping
process to determine the range of issues
and alternatives to be addressed. A
public scoping meeting will be held on
Wednesday, September 13, 2017, from
3–7:30 p.m. at the Coos Bay Public
Library, 525 Anderson Ave., Coos Bay,
OR 97420. The Corps expects the Draft
EIS to be made available to the public
in March 2018.
John D. Cunningham,
Major, Corps of Engineers Deputy District
Commander.
[FR Doc. 2017–17483 Filed 8–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2017–ICCD–0084]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Request for Title IV Reimbursement or
Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 (HCM2)
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
September 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2017–ICCD–0084. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
224–84, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Jo-Anne
Cheatom, 202–377–3730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39417-39418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17483]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
Coos Bay Channel Modification Project
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District intends to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the
potential environmental effects of approving the Oregon International
Port of Coos Bay's (OIPCB) proposed Coos Bay Channel Modification
Project. The OIPCB proposes to widen and deepen the Coos Bay Federal
Navigation Project from the ocean to river mile (RM) 8.2 to improve
navigation efficiency, reduce shipping transportation costs and
facilitate the shipping industry's transition to larger, more efficient
vessels.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on or
before October 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Portland District (PM-E), P.O. Box 2946, Portland, OR 97208-2946, or at
the project Web site: https://www.nwp.usace.army.mil/coast/coos-bay/channel-modification. All comments should include ``Coos Bay Channel
Modification Project EIS'' in the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and draft EIS can be addressed to: Dr. Ann Hodgson, by mail, telephone
(503) 808-4663, or by email at coosbaychannelmodEIS@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Previous Withdrawn Action. The Corps
published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS and Feasibility Study
for a previous proposal to modify the Coos Bay Federal Navigation
Project on January 11, 2008 (73 FR 2013). The channel modification
described in 2008 was proposed under the authority of Section 203 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; however, the proposal was
withdrawn and a draft EIS was not prepared.
2. Proposed Action. The OIPCB is requesting approval to construct
the Coos Bay Channel Modification Project. If approved, the OIPCB would
construct the project without any federal cost sharing (i.e., the OIPCB
would pay 100 percent of the cost of construction). The proposed
project requires Department of the Army authorization under: Section
204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended (33
U.S.C. 2232); Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33
U.S.C. 408, commonly referred to as Section 408), Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403); Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); and Section 103 of the Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (33
U.S.C. 1413).
Section 204 authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through
the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, to grant approval
to non-federal entities to design and construct improvements to Corps
navigation projects. This section also provides that the Secretary
shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of those
improvements if the Secretary determines the improvements are
economically justified, environmentally acceptable and certifies the
project was constructed in accordance with applicable permits and
engineering and design standards.
Section 408 authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through
the Chief of Engineers, to grant permission for the alteration or
occupation or use of Corps Civil Works projects (e.g., a federal
navigation project) if the Secretary determines that the activity will
not be injurious to the public interest and will not impair the
usefulness of the project.
Section 10, Section 404, and Section 103 authorizes the Secretary
of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to issue permits to
authorize work in navigable waters of the U.S., to authorize the
discharge of dredged of fill material into waters of the U.S., and to
authorize the transport of dredged material for the purpose of dumping
it into ocean waters, respectively.
The Corps, as the lead agency for compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), has determined the above-listed
actions require the preparation of an EIS. The following state and
federal agencies may participate as cooperating agencies for the
preparation of the EIS: The Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Coast
Guard, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of
Land Conservation and Development, Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality. In addition, the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower
Umpqua, and Siuslaw, Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians, and the
Coquille Indian Tribe may participate as cooperating entities on the
preparation of the EIS.
3. Project Site and Background. The project site is in Coos Bay,
located on the southern coast of Oregon. The Coos Bay Federal
Navigation Project was originally authorized by the Rivers and Harbors
Act of March 1879. The Coos Bay Federal Navigation Project includes two
entrance jetties, the two navigation channels, two turning basins, and
pile dikes. The current channel configuration from the ocean entrance
to the navigation channel is -47 feet deep, the channel transitions to
-37 feet deep between RM 0 to RM 1, then maintains -37 feet deep from
RM 1 to RM 15.0. The main channel has a nominal width of 300 feet wide
from the ocean inlet to RM 9.2. At RM 9.2, the channel widens to 400
feet and continues at that width to RM 15.0; from RM 15.0 through RM
17.0, the channel decreases to -22 feet deep and 150 feet wide.
Advanced
[[Page 39418]]
maintenance dredging and allowable overdepth dredging (standard
practice on deep draft navigation channels) results in a depth
approximately five feet deeper than the authorized depth. The secondary
channel, known as the Charleston Channel, is not included in the
proposed project.
4. Project Description. The OIPCB proposes to deepen and widen the
navigation channel from the ocean to approximately RM 8.2. The project
would require the dredging and disposal of approximately 18 million
cubic yards of material (sand and rock) to deepen and widen the
navigation channel. The proposed navigation channel configuration would
be -45 feet deep with a nominal width of 450 feet wide. The entrance to
the navigation channel at the ocean would have a nominal width of 1,280
feet and an authorized depth of 57 feet MLLW at its offshore entrance.
The channel width would transition to a width of 450 feet at RM 1; this
narrowing is continuous from the offshore entrance until RM 1. Upstream
of RM 1, the proposed channel would have a nominal width of 450 feet
and an authorized depth of 45 feet MLLW. The proposed project design
would also accommodate advance maintenance dredging and allowable
overdepth dredging of approximately five feet deeper than the proposed
depths. The modified channel would have a vessel-turning basin
extending from RM 7.3 to RM 7.8. At its full width, the proposed
vessel-turning basin is 1,400-feet-long and 1,100-feet-wide, with an
authorized depth of 37 feet MLLW. The portion of the channel that
intersects this turning basin will have an authorized depth of 45 feet
MLLW. The Port proposes to dispose of this dredged material at a newly
proposed Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site located approximately two
miles offshore of the navigation channel entrance. The proposed
disposal site would have an area of approximately 1,850 acres in water
depths ranging from -140 to -320 feet deep. The channel modification
project would include improvements to the North Jetty to alleviate
impacts from the entrance channel widening, deepening, and lengthening,
and to retard erosion at Log-Spiral Bay, by placing rock at the jetty
toe and by increasing the size of the rock along the jetty head. The
channel modification would also include the relocation and expansion of
aids to navigation by relocating and installing new fixed and floating
channel and range markers. The Corps will be responsible for the
operation and maintenance of these improvements if the Secretary
determines the improvements are economically justified, environmentally
acceptable and certifies the project was constructed in accordance with
applicable permits and engineering and design standards.
5. Alternatives. The draft EIS will evaluate a range of reasonable
alternatives. Alternatives may include, but are not limited to, no
action, alternative channel widths and depths, and alternative dredged
material disposal locations.
6. Other Environmental Reviews and Consultations. Other
environmental reviews and consultations for the proposed project may
include, but is not limited to, Section 401 of the Clean Water Act,
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, Section 305 of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, Section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act, and Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
7. Scoping Process and Public Comments. The Corps will conduct
public scoping (40 CFR 1501.7) to determine the scope of issues (40 CFR
1508.25) to be addressed in the draft EIS and to identify the
significant issues related to the proposed project. All interested
parties including individuals; organizations; local, state, and federal
agencies; and tribes and tribal governments are invited to participate
in the scoping process for the draft EIS, which will analyze numerous
issues in depth. These issues include, but are not limited to:
Navigation, socioeconomics, fish and wildlife, water quality, safety,
shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, and cultural and historic
resources. Scoping comments also will be used to develop possible
project alternatives. Additional project information is available
online at: www.nwp.usace.army.mil/coast/coos-bay/channel-modification.
All parties are invited to participate in the scoping process to
determine the range of issues and alternatives to be addressed. A
public scoping meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 13, 2017,
from 3-7:30 p.m. at the Coos Bay Public Library, 525 Anderson Ave.,
Coos Bay, OR 97420. The Corps expects the Draft EIS to be made
available to the public in March 2018.
John D. Cunningham,
Major, Corps of Engineers Deputy District Commander.
[FR Doc. 2017-17483 Filed 8-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P