Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution Control District, 38604-38605 [2017-16823]
Download as PDF
38604
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone
around vessels involved in Coast Guard
training exercises in Hood Canal, WA
set forth in 33 CFR 165.1339, from 12
a.m. on November 6, 2017 through 11:30
p.m. on November 10, 2017, unless
cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port. Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1339, no person or vessel may enter
or remain within 500 yards of any vessel
involved in Coast Guard training
exercises while such vessel is transiting
Hood Canal, WA between Foul Weather
Bluff and the entrance to Dabob Bay,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative. In
addition, the regulation establishes
requirements for all vessels to obtain
permission for entry during the
enforcement period by contacting the
on-scene patrol commander on VHF
channel 13 or 16, or the Sector Puget
Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at
206–217–6001. Members of the
maritime public will be able to identify
participating vessels as those flying the
Coast Guard Ensign. The COTP may also
be assisted in the enforcement of the
zone by other federal, state, or local
agencies.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 165.1339 and
5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
notice of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard plans to
provide notification of this enforcement
period via the Local Notice to Mariners,
marine information broadcasts, and onscene assets. If the COTP determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
this notice, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners may be used to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: August 8, 2017.
Linda A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017–17141 Filed 8–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0218; FRL–9965–90–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Placer County
Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern the District’s
demonstration regarding Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS), and
negative declarations for the polyester
resin source category for the 2008 8hour ozone standard. We are approving
SUMMARY:
the submitted SIP revisions under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0218. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, Law.Nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 15, 2017 (82 FR 27456), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
documents into the California SIP.
Local agency
Document
PCAPCD ...................
2006 Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Update
Analysis (‘‘2006 RACT SIP’’).
2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Analysis
(‘‘2014 RACT SIP’’).
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
PCAPCD ...................
PCAPCD’s July 18, 2014 submittal
also included negative declarations for
the Polyester Resin source category
covered by the following control
techniques guidelines (CTGs): EPA–450/
3–83–008, Control of Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions from Manufacture
of High-Density Polyethylene,
Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins
and EPA–450/3–83–006, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from
Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer
and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
The District certified that it had no
sources subject to the CTG documents.
We proposed to approve these
documents because we determined that
they complied with the relevant CAA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:06 Aug 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
Adopted
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the
documents and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving these documents, including
the negative declarations into the
California SIP.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
08/10/06
07/11/07
04/10/14
07/18/14
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:06 Aug 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 16, 2017.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(382)(ii)(D) and
(c)(449)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(382) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Placer County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) 2006 Reasonably Available Control
Technology State Implementation Plan
Update Analysis, as adopted on August
10, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
(449) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Placer County Air Pollution
Control District.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38605
(1) 2014 Reasonably Available Control
Technology State Implementation Plan
Analysis, as adopted on April 10, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(4)(iv) to read as
follows:
§ 52.222
Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) Polyester Resin was submitted on
July 18, 2014 and adopted on April 10,
2014.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–16823 Filed 8–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0078; FRL–9965–60–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia: New
Source Review and Permitting Updates
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve changes to the Georgia
State Implementation Plan (SIP) to
revise new source review (NSR) and
miscellaneous permitting regulations.
EPA is approving portions of SIP
revisions submitted by the State of
Georgia, through the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources’
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD), on December 15, 2011, July 25,
2014, and November 12, 2014. This
action is being taken pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
October 16, 2017 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by September 14, 2017. If EPA receives
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2017–0078 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38604-38605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16823]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0218; FRL-9965-90-Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air
Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (PCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern the District's demonstration regarding
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS), and negative declarations for the polyester resin source
category for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. We are approving the
submitted SIP revisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on September 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0218. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4126, Law.Nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 15, 2017 (82 FR 27456), the EPA proposed to approve the
following documents into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Document Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCAPCD..................................... 2006 Reasonably Available Control 08/10/06 07/11/07
Technology State Implementation
Plan Update Analysis (``2006 RACT
SIP'').
PCAPCD..................................... 2014 Reasonably Available Control 04/10/14 07/18/14
Technology State Implementation
Plan Analysis (``2014 RACT SIP'').
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCAPCD's July 18, 2014 submittal also included negative
declarations for the Polyester Resin source category covered by the
following control techniques guidelines (CTGs): EPA-450/3-83-008,
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of
High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins and
EPA-450/3-83-006, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from
Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
The District certified that it had no sources subject to the CTG
documents.
We proposed to approve these documents because we determined that
they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the documents and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these documents,
including the negative declarations into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
[[Page 38605]]
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 16, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(382)(ii)(D) and
(c)(449)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(382) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Placer County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) 2006 Reasonably Available Control Technology State
Implementation Plan Update Analysis, as adopted on August 10, 2006.
* * * * *
(449) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Placer County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) 2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology State
Implementation Plan Analysis, as adopted on April 10, 2014.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.222 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(4)(iv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.222 Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) Polyester Resin was submitted on July 18, 2014 and adopted on
April 10, 2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-16823 Filed 8-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P