Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Nonattainment New Source Review Permit Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard, 37829-37830 [2017-17022]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules • NASS Dairy Products Prices: How Does That Work?; and • NASS Survey Cheddar Cheese Price Data (May 23, 1997; June 27, 1997; August 1, 1997; September 5, 1997; October 10, 1997; December 19, 1997; December 29, 1997; January 23, 1998; February 20, 1998; March 20, 1998; April 24, 1998; May 29, 1998; June 26, 1998; July 31, 1998; August 28, 1998; and October 2, 1998). USDA Office of the Chief Economist Publication • Drought Monitor: Percentage of crops and livestock located in drought, March 2016. Federal Government Resources • Census Bureau data on Upper Midwest FMMO, Market Area Population; • Energy Information Administration Weekly Retail Gasoline and Diesel Prices, January 2011–July 2015; • Federal Highway Administration Highway Statistics Summary to 1995; and • Federal Highway Administration Highway Statistics, Annual Issues, 1995–2012. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register Publications • 3 FR 1945–1949 regarding the handling of milk in the New York Metropolitan Marketing Area, August 1938; • 26 FR 7134–7141 regarding amendments to the Chicago marketing order, August 1961; • 27 FR 799–816 regarding amendments to pricing of milk reserves and excess reserves, January 1962; • 31 FR 7062 regarding a Puget Sound, Washington, market area expansion and amendments to producer-handler definition, May 1966; • 39 FR 11567–11571 regarding a partial decision on emergency measures to suspend butter powder prices, March 1974; • 44 FR 48128–48130 regarding a decision to not promulgate an order in the Southwestern Idaho-Eastern Oregon marketing area, August 1979; • 50 FR 32716, 32718–32719 regarding a decision to expand two marketing areas and revise location differentials in the Middle Atlantic and New York-New Jersey areas, August 1985; • 52 FR 15951–15960 regarding termination of proceedings on proposed amendments to the Georgia and certain other marketing areas, May 1987; • 53 FR 686–731 regarding the merger of two marketing areas in the Great Basin and Lake Mead marketing areas, January 1988; VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:54 Aug 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 • 53 FR 36321–36334 regarding a final decision to provide partial credits to handlers hauling surplus milk in the Texas marketing area, September 1988; • 55 FR 25618–25669 regarding promulgation of a Carolina FMMO, June 1990; • 56 FR 57850–57864 regarding a decision to adopt multiple component pricing for the Mid-Atlantic FMMO, November 1991; • 58 FR 58112–58137 regarding amendments to the New England and Certain Other Marketing Areas, October 1993; • 59 FR 8546–8565 regarding amendments to the Pacific Northwest and Southwestern Idaho-Eastern Oregon Marketing Areas, February 1994; • 60 FR 7290–7333 regarding amendments to the New England and Other Marketing Areas, February 1995; • 60 FR 25014–25071 regarding amendments to the Georgia and Certain Other Marketing Areas, May 1995; • 60 FR 41833–41868 regarding amendments to the Chicago Regional and Other Marketing Areas, August 1995; • 60 FR 43066–43089 regarding amendments to the Southern Michigan Marketing Area, August 1995; • 64 Fed Reg. 70868–70912 regarding amendments to the New England and Other Marketing Areas, December 1999; • 65 FR 76832–76861 regarding amendments to the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas, December 2000; • 70 FR 74166, 7418 regarding a final decision on amendments to the Pacific Northwest and Arizona-Las Vegas Marketing Areas, December 2005; • 71 FR 67467–67495 regarding amendments to the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas, November 2006; • 73 FR 11194–11229 regarding amendments to the Appalachian, Florida, and Southeast Marketing Areas, February 2008; • 73 FR 35306–35331 regarding amendments to the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas, June 2008; • 75 FR 33534–33533 regarding amendments to the Northeast and Other Marketing Areas, June 2010; and • 78 FR 9248 regarding a final decision to adopt changes to the make allowances and butterfat yield factor in Class III and IV price formulas, February 2013. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–608. Dated: August 8, 2017. Bruce Summers, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2017–17100 Filed 8–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 37829 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0150; FRL–9965–91– Region 1] Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Nonattainment New Source Review Permit Requirements for the 2008 8Hour Ozone Standard Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted on March 9, 2017, by the State of Connecticut, through the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP), addressing the nonattainment new source review (NNSR) requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The SIP revision addresses both of Connecticut’s ozone nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS; the Greater Connecticut area and the Connecticut portion of the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJCT area. The Connecticut portion of the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT ozone nonattainment area consists of Fairfield, New Haven, and Middlesex counties. The Greater Connecticut nonattainment area includes the rest of the State. This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 13, 2017. SUMMARY: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– OAR–2017–0150 at https:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to dahl.donald@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM 14AUP1 37830 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 155 / Monday, August 14, 2017 / Proposed Rules make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Dahl, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, 5 Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05– 2), Boston, MA 02109–3912. Mr. Dahl’s telephone number is (617) 918–1657; email address: dahl.donald@epa.gov. In the Final Rules Section of this issue of the Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this issue of the Federal Register. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: July 24, 2017. Deborah A. Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 2017–17022 Filed 8–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:54 Aug 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CG Docket No. 17–169; FCC 17–91] Protecting Consumers From Unauthorized Carrier Changes and Related Unauthorized Charges Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: In this document, the Commission proposes to amend its rules to prohibit carriers from misrepresenting themselves when placing telemarketing sales calls to consumers and placing unauthorized charges on their phone bills. The Commission seeks comment on ways to strengthen its rules to protect consumers from slamming and cramming and proposes to codify a rule prohibiting misrepresentations on carrier telemarketing calls to consumers that often precede a carrier switch, and proposes to codify a rule against cramming. The intended effect of this action is to prevent unscrupulous carriers from targeting vulnerable populations from committing fraud either on sales calls or when ‘‘verifying’’ a consumer switch. DATES: Comments are due on or before September 13, 2017, and reply comments are due on or before October 13, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by CG Docket No. 17–169 and/or FCC Number 17–91, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), through the Commission’s Web site: https:// apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, in completing the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S. Postal service mailing address, and CG Docket No. 17–169. • Mail: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the Commission continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly A. Wild, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB), at (202) 418–1324, email: Kimberly.Wild@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Rules and Policies Protecting Consumers from Unauthorized Carrier Changes and Related Unauthorized Charges, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, document FCC 17–91, adopted on July 13, 2017, released on July 14, 2017. The full text of document FCC 17–91 will be available for public inspection and copying via ECFS, and during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. A copy of document FCC 17–91 and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may also be found by searching ECFS at: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/ (insert CG Docket No. 17–169 into the Proceeding block). Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using ECFS. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). • All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th Street SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. • Commercial Mail sent by overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to § 1.1200 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1200, this matter shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance with the Commission’s ex parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM 14AUP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 155 (Monday, August 14, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37829-37830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17022]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0150; FRL-9965-91-Region 1]


Air Plan Approval; Connecticut; Nonattainment New Source Review 
Permit Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve the state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted on March 
9, 2017, by the State of Connecticut, through the Connecticut 
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP), addressing 
the nonattainment new source review (NNSR) requirements for the 2008 8-
hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The SIP 
revision addresses both of Connecticut's ozone nonattainment areas for 
the 2008 ozone NAAQS; the Greater Connecticut area and the Connecticut 
portion of the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT area. The 
Connecticut portion of the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT 
ozone nonattainment area consists of Fairfield, New Haven, and 
Middlesex counties. The Greater Connecticut nonattainment area includes 
the rest of the State. This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean 
Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 13, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2017-0150 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
dahl.donald@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to

[[Page 37830]]

make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents 
located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI 
or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective 
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Dahl, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem 
Protection, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, 5 Post 
Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912. 
Mr. Dahl's telephone number is (617) 918-1657; email address: 
dahl.donald@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this issue of 
the Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a 
direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this 
as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action 
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this 
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, 
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions 
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the Rules Section of this issue of the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 24, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2017-17022 Filed 8-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.