Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S. Decision and Order, 37611-37612 [2017-17011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices
Rules Governing Section 2255
Proceedings.
Rules of Evidence: 807.
The text of the proposed rules and
form and the accompanying Committee
Notes are posted on the Judiciary’s Web
site at: https://www.uscourts.gov/rulespolicies/proposed-amendmentspublished-public-comment.
All written comments and suggestions
with respect to the proposed
amendments may be submitted on or
after the opening of the period for
public comment on August 15, 2017,
but no later than February 15, 2018.
Written comments must be submitted
electronically, following the
instructions provided on the Web site.
All comments submitted will be posted
on the Web site and available to the
public.
Public hearings are scheduled on the
proposed amendments as follows:
• Appellate Rules in Washington, DC,
on November 9, 2017, and in Phoenix,
Arizona, on January 5, 2018;
• Bankruptcy Rules in Washington,
DC, on January 17, 2018, and in
Pasadena, California, on January 30,
2018;
• Criminal Rules in Chicago, Illinois,
on October 24, 2017, and in Phoenix,
Arizona, on January 5, 2018; and
• Evidence Rules in Boston,
Massachusetts, on October 27, 2017, and
in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 5, 2018.
Those wishing to testify must contact
the Secretary by email at: Rules_
Support@ao.uscourts.gov, with a copy
mailed to the address below, at least 30
days before the hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary,
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure of the Judicial Conference of
the United States, Thurgood Marshall
Federal Judiciary Building, One
Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7–240,
Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202)
502–1820.
Dated: August 7, 2017.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice
and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the
United States.
[FR Doc. 2017–16916 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S. Decision and
Order
On May 5, 2017, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Aug 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
Administration (hereinafter, DEA or
Government), issued an Order to Show
Cause to Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S.
(hereinafter, Registrant), the holder of
Certificate of Registration No.
AG1976971 in Chula Vista, California,
pursuant to which he is authorized to
prescribe controlled substances in
Schedules II through IV.1 GX 1
(Certification of Registration Status
dated May 17, 2017). The Show Cause
Order proposed the revocation of
Registrant’s Certificate of Registration
and the denial of any pending
application for renewal or modification
of Registrant’s registration on the
ground that Registrant does not have
authority to dispense controlled
substances in California, the State in
which he is registered. GX 3, at 1 (citing
21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
As the jurisdictional basis for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant’s registration
expires on September 30, 2017. Id.
As the substantive grounds for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant currently lacks
authority to ‘‘handle controlled
substances in California,’’ voluntarily
surrendered his California dental
license ‘‘on approximately September 8,
2016,’’ and subsequently ‘‘signed a
Stipulated Surrender of License and
Order before the Dental Board of
California’’ on November 7, 2016.2 Id. at
2. The Government asserted that
Registrant’s ‘‘lack of authority to handle
controlled substances in the State of
California constitutes grounds to revoke
. . . [his] registration.’’ Id.
Citing 21 CFR 1301.43, the Show
Cause Order notified Registrant of his
right to request a hearing on the
allegation or to submit a written
statement while waiving his right to a
hearing, the procedure for electing each
option, and the consequence for failing
to elect either option. Id. at 2. Citing 21
U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C), it notified Registrant
of the opportunity to submit a corrective
action plan. Id. at 3.
The lead DEA Diversion Investigator
(hereinafter, DI) assigned to Registrant’s
matter executed a Declaration in which
she stated that, on May 5, 2017, she
personally served Registrant with a copy
of the Order to Show Cause at his
1 The Order to Show Cause stated that Registrant
was authorized to prescribe controlled substances
in Schedule V.
2 The Government submitted the Stipulated
Surrender of License and Order before the Dental
Board of California (hereinafter, DBC), the
Accusation dated May 2, 2012, the Decision and
Order of the DBC dated October 4, 2013, and the
DBC Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order
dated July 31, 2013 with its Request for Final
Agency Action (hereinafter, RFAA). GX 4
(Appendices).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37611
residence. GX 4, at 1. I find that the
Government’s service of the Show Cause
Order on Registrant was legally
sufficient.
The Government submitted a Request
for Final Agency Action dated June 6,
2017 and an evidentiary record to
support the Show Cause Order’s
allegations. In the RFAA, the
Government represented that, ‘‘Thirty
days passed from the date of service and
Respondent requested no hearing on the
OTSC, nor has he filed a written
statement in lieu of requesting a
hearing.’’ RFAA, at 1.
Based on the Government’s
representations and my review of the
record, I find that more than 30 days
have now passed since the date on
which Registrant was served with the
Show Cause Order and neither
Registrant, nor anyone purporting to
represent him, has requested a hearing
or submitted a written statement while
waiving his right to a hearing.
Accordingly, I find that Registrant has
waived his right to a hearing and his
right to submit a written statement. 21
CFR 1301.43(d). I therefore issue this
Decision and Order based on the record
submitted by the Government. 21 CFR
1301.43(e).
Findings of Fact
Registrant’s DEA Registration
Registrant currently holds DEA
practitioner registration AG1976971
authorizing him to dispense controlled
substances in Schedules II through IV.
GX 1, GX 2. This registration expires on
September 30, 2017. Id.
DEA practitioner registration
AG1976971 is assigned to Registrant at
‘‘232 Third Avenue, Ste A, 232 3rd
Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910.’’ Id.
The Status of Registrant’s State License
On November 15, 2016, the Dental
Board of California ordered that Dental
License No. 24551 was surrendered and
accepted by the DBC. GX 4, Appendix
A (Stipulated Surrender of License and
Order). Pursuant to that Order,
Registrant has lost ‘‘all rights and
privileges as a dentist in California.’’ Id.
at 2.
Discussion
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), the
Attorney General is authorized to
suspend or revoke a registration issued
under section 823 of the Controlled
Substances Act (hereinafter, CSA),
‘‘upon a finding that the registrant . . .
has had his State license . . .
suspended, revoked, or denied by
competent State authority and is no
longer authorized by State law to engage
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
37612
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 154 / Friday, August 11, 2017 / Notices
in the . . . dispensing of controlled
substances.’’ With respect to a
practitioner, the DEA has also long held
that the possession of authority to
dispense controlled substances under
the laws of the State in which a
practitioner engages in professional
practice is a fundamental condition for
obtaining and maintaining a
practitioner’s registration. See, e.g.,
James L. Hooper, 76 FR 71,371 (2011),
pet. for rev. denied, 481 Fed. Appx. 826
(4th Cir. 2012); Frederick Marsh
Blanton, 43 FR 27,616 (1978).
This rule derives from the text of two
provisions of the CSA. First, Congress
defined the term ‘‘ ‘practitioner’ [to]
mean[ ] a . . . physician, dentist, . . .
or other person licensed, registered, or
otherwise permitted, by . . . the
jurisdiction in which he practices . . .,
to distribute, dispense, [or] administer
. . . a controlled substance in the
course of professional practice . . . .’’
21 U.S.C. 802(21). Second, in setting the
requirements for obtaining a
practitioner’s registration, Congress
directed that ‘‘[t]he Attorney General
shall register practitioners . . . if the
applicant is authorized to dispense . . .
controlled substances under the laws of
the State in which he practices.’’ 21
U.S.C. 823(f). Because Congress has
clearly mandated that a practitioner
possess state authority in order to be
deemed a practitioner under the CSA,
the DEA has held repeatedly that
revocation of a practitioner’s registration
is the appropriate sanction whenever he
is no longer authorized to dispense
controlled substances under the laws of
the State in which he practices. See,
e.g., Hooper, 76 FR at 71,371–72; Sheran
Arden Yeates, 71 FR 39,130, 39,131
(2006); Dominick A. Ricci, 58 FR 51,104,
51,105 (1993); Bobby Watts, 53 FR
11,919, 11,920 (1988); Blanton, 43 FR at
27,616.
Under California law, section 1626 of
the Business and Professions Code
provides that ‘‘[i]t is unlawful for any
person to engage in the practice of
dentistry in the state . . . unless the
person has a valid, unexpired license or
special permit from the Board.’’ Cal.
Bus. & Prof. Code § 1626 (2017).3
Further, section 11210 of the California
Health and Safety Code sets out who
may lawfully prescribe controlled
substances in California other than for
the treatment of addicts. California
licensed dentists are among those lawful
3 Dentistry and the practice of dentistry are
addressed in Cal. Bus & Prof. Code § 1625 which
states, among other things, that dentistry is the
diagnosis or treatment of diseases and may include
the use of ‘‘drugs.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Aug 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
prescribers.4 See Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code
§ 11024 (2017).
In this case, pursuant to the DBC
Stipulated Surrender of License and
Order, Registrant has lost all rights and
privileges as a dentist in California.
Supra. Consequently, under California
law, Registrant is not currently
authorized to handle controlled
substances in that State. Supra. I,
therefore, conclude that the record
supports the revocation of Registrant’s
registration because he does not possess
authority to dispense controlled
substances under the laws of California,
the State in which he is registered. 21
U.S.C. 824(a)(3). Thus, I find that
Registrant is not entitled to maintain his
DEA registration. Blanton, supra.
Accordingly, I will order that his
registration be revoked and that any
pending application for the renewal or
modification of his registration be
denied. Id.
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well as 28 CFR
0.100(b), I order that DEA Certificate of
Registration AG1976971 issued to Luis
C B Gomez, D.D.S., be, and it hereby is,
revoked. I further order that any
pending application of Luis C B Gomez,
D.D.S., to renew or modify this
registration, as well as any other
pending application by him for
registration in the State of California, be,
and it hereby is, denied. This order is
effective September 11, 2017.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017–17011 Filed 8–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Existing
Collection in Use Without OMB Control
Number Address Verification/Change
Request Form (1–797)
Criminal Justice Information
Services Division, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
Department of Justice (DOJ),
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register on
March 16, 2017 allowing for a 60 day
comment period.
DATES: Comments are encourages and
will be accepted for an additional 30
day until September 11, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Gerry Lynn
Brovey, Supervisory Information
Liaison Specialist, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division, 1000
Custer Hollow Road; Clarksburg, WV
26306; phone: 304–625–4320 or email
glbrovey@ic.fbi.gov. Written comments
and/or suggestions can also be sent to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to OIRA_submissions@
omb.eop.gov.
SUMMARY:
Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4 A physician, surgeon, dentist, veterinarian,
naturopathic doctor . . ., podiatrist, or pharmacist
. . ., or registered nurse . . ., or physician assistant
. . ., or an optometrist . . . may prescribe for,
furnish to, or administer controlled substances to
his or her patient when the patient is suffering from
a disease, ailment, injury, or infirmities attendant
upon old age, other than addiction to a controlled
substance. Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11210
(2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 154 (Friday, August 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37611-37612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17011]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S. Decision and Order
On May 5, 2017, the Assistant Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter, DEA or
Government), issued an Order to Show Cause to Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S.
(hereinafter, Registrant), the holder of Certificate of Registration
No. AG1976971 in Chula Vista, California, pursuant to which he is
authorized to prescribe controlled substances in Schedules II through
IV.\1\ GX 1 (Certification of Registration Status dated May 17, 2017).
The Show Cause Order proposed the revocation of Registrant's
Certificate of Registration and the denial of any pending application
for renewal or modification of Registrant's registration on the ground
that Registrant does not have authority to dispense controlled
substances in California, the State in which he is registered. GX 3, at
1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Order to Show Cause stated that Registrant was
authorized to prescribe controlled substances in Schedule V.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the jurisdictional basis for the proceeding, the Show Cause
Order alleged that Registrant's registration expires on September 30,
2017. Id.
As the substantive grounds for the proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant currently lacks authority to ``handle
controlled substances in California,'' voluntarily surrendered his
California dental license ``on approximately September 8, 2016,'' and
subsequently ``signed a Stipulated Surrender of License and Order
before the Dental Board of California'' on November 7, 2016.\2\ Id. at
2. The Government asserted that Registrant's ``lack of authority to
handle controlled substances in the State of California constitutes
grounds to revoke . . . [his] registration.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Government submitted the Stipulated Surrender of License
and Order before the Dental Board of California (hereinafter, DBC),
the Accusation dated May 2, 2012, the Decision and Order of the DBC
dated October 4, 2013, and the DBC Stipulated Settlement and
Disciplinary Order dated July 31, 2013 with its Request for Final
Agency Action (hereinafter, RFAA). GX 4 (Appendices).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citing 21 CFR 1301.43, the Show Cause Order notified Registrant of
his right to request a hearing on the allegation or to submit a written
statement while waiving his right to a hearing, the procedure for
electing each option, and the consequence for failing to elect either
option. Id. at 2. Citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C), it notified Registrant
of the opportunity to submit a corrective action plan. Id. at 3.
The lead DEA Diversion Investigator (hereinafter, DI) assigned to
Registrant's matter executed a Declaration in which she stated that, on
May 5, 2017, she personally served Registrant with a copy of the Order
to Show Cause at his residence. GX 4, at 1. I find that the
Government's service of the Show Cause Order on Registrant was legally
sufficient.
The Government submitted a Request for Final Agency Action dated
June 6, 2017 and an evidentiary record to support the Show Cause
Order's allegations. In the RFAA, the Government represented that,
``Thirty days passed from the date of service and Respondent requested
no hearing on the OTSC, nor has he filed a written statement in lieu of
requesting a hearing.'' RFAA, at 1.
Based on the Government's representations and my review of the
record, I find that more than 30 days have now passed since the date on
which Registrant was served with the Show Cause Order and neither
Registrant, nor anyone purporting to represent him, has requested a
hearing or submitted a written statement while waiving his right to a
hearing. Accordingly, I find that Registrant has waived his right to a
hearing and his right to submit a written statement. 21 CFR 1301.43(d).
I therefore issue this Decision and Order based on the record submitted
by the Government. 21 CFR 1301.43(e).
Findings of Fact
Registrant's DEA Registration
Registrant currently holds DEA practitioner registration AG1976971
authorizing him to dispense controlled substances in Schedules II
through IV. GX 1, GX 2. This registration expires on September 30,
2017. Id.
DEA practitioner registration AG1976971 is assigned to Registrant
at ``232 Third Avenue, Ste A, 232 3rd Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910.''
Id.
The Status of Registrant's State License
On November 15, 2016, the Dental Board of California ordered that
Dental License No. 24551 was surrendered and accepted by the DBC. GX 4,
Appendix A (Stipulated Surrender of License and Order). Pursuant to
that Order, Registrant has lost ``all rights and privileges as a
dentist in California.'' Id. at 2.
Discussion
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), the Attorney General is authorized
to suspend or revoke a registration issued under section 823 of the
Controlled Substances Act (hereinafter, CSA), ``upon a finding that the
registrant . . . has had his State license . . . suspended, revoked, or
denied by competent State authority and is no longer authorized by
State law to engage
[[Page 37612]]
in the . . . dispensing of controlled substances.'' With respect to a
practitioner, the DEA has also long held that the possession of
authority to dispense controlled substances under the laws of the State
in which a practitioner engages in professional practice is a
fundamental condition for obtaining and maintaining a practitioner's
registration. See, e.g., James L. Hooper, 76 FR 71,371 (2011), pet. for
rev. denied, 481 Fed. Appx. 826 (4th Cir. 2012); Frederick Marsh
Blanton, 43 FR 27,616 (1978).
This rule derives from the text of two provisions of the CSA.
First, Congress defined the term `` `practitioner' [to] mean[ ] a . . .
physician, dentist, . . . or other person licensed, registered, or
otherwise permitted, by . . . the jurisdiction in which he practices .
. ., to distribute, dispense, [or] administer . . . a controlled
substance in the course of professional practice . . . .'' 21 U.S.C.
802(21). Second, in setting the requirements for obtaining a
practitioner's registration, Congress directed that ``[t]he Attorney
General shall register practitioners . . . if the applicant is
authorized to dispense . . . controlled substances under the laws of
the State in which he practices.'' 21 U.S.C. 823(f). Because Congress
has clearly mandated that a practitioner possess state authority in
order to be deemed a practitioner under the CSA, the DEA has held
repeatedly that revocation of a practitioner's registration is the
appropriate sanction whenever he is no longer authorized to dispense
controlled substances under the laws of the State in which he
practices. See, e.g., Hooper, 76 FR at 71,371-72; Sheran Arden Yeates,
71 FR 39,130, 39,131 (2006); Dominick A. Ricci, 58 FR 51,104, 51,105
(1993); Bobby Watts, 53 FR 11,919, 11,920 (1988); Blanton, 43 FR at
27,616.
Under California law, section 1626 of the Business and Professions
Code provides that ``[i]t is unlawful for any person to engage in the
practice of dentistry in the state . . . unless the person has a valid,
unexpired license or special permit from the Board.'' Cal. Bus. & Prof.
Code Sec. 1626 (2017).\3\ Further, section 11210 of the California
Health and Safety Code sets out who may lawfully prescribe controlled
substances in California other than for the treatment of addicts.
California licensed dentists are among those lawful prescribers.\4\ See
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 11024 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Dentistry and the practice of dentistry are addressed in
Cal. Bus & Prof. Code Sec. 1625 which states, among other things,
that dentistry is the diagnosis or treatment of diseases and may
include the use of ``drugs.''
\4\ A physician, surgeon, dentist, veterinarian, naturopathic
doctor . . ., podiatrist, or pharmacist . . ., or registered nurse .
. ., or physician assistant . . ., or an optometrist . . . may
prescribe for, furnish to, or administer controlled substances to
his or her patient when the patient is suffering from a disease,
ailment, injury, or infirmities attendant upon old age, other than
addiction to a controlled substance. Cal. Health & Safety Code Sec.
11210 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this case, pursuant to the DBC Stipulated Surrender of License
and Order, Registrant has lost all rights and privileges as a dentist
in California. Supra. Consequently, under California law, Registrant is
not currently authorized to handle controlled substances in that State.
Supra. I, therefore, conclude that the record supports the revocation
of Registrant's registration because he does not possess authority to
dispense controlled substances under the laws of California, the State
in which he is registered. 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3). Thus, I find that
Registrant is not entitled to maintain his DEA registration. Blanton,
supra. Accordingly, I will order that his registration be revoked and
that any pending application for the renewal or modification of his
registration be denied. Id.
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), as well
as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that DEA Certificate of Registration
AG1976971 issued to Luis C B Gomez, D.D.S., be, and it hereby is,
revoked. I further order that any pending application of Luis C B
Gomez, D.D.S., to renew or modify this registration, as well as any
other pending application by him for registration in the State of
California, be, and it hereby is, denied. This order is effective
September 11, 2017.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-17011 Filed 8-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P